准噶尔盆地北三台地区清水河组低渗透储层成因机制

doi:10.7623/syxb201205004

石油学报 ›› 2012, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (5): 758-771.DOI: 10.7623/syxb201205004

准噶尔盆地北三台地区清水河组低渗透储层成因机制

操应长 1　远光辉 1　王艳忠 1　葸克来 1　匡立春 2　王绪龙 2　贾希玉 2　宋　永 2

1　中国石油大学地球科学与技术学院　山东青岛　266580；2　中国石油新疆油田公司　新疆克拉玛依　834000

收稿日期:2012-02-14 修回日期:2012-06-25 出版日期:2012-09-25 发布日期:2012-11-27
通讯作者: 操应长
作者简介:操应长，男，1969年1月生，1992年获石油大学（华东）沉积地质专业学士学位，2003年获中国科学院地质学博士学位，现为中国石油大学（华东）教授、博士生导师，主要从事沉积学、层序地层学及油气储层地质学的教学和科研工作。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（No.40972080）、国家重大科技专项（2011ZX05009）、中国石油大学（华东）研究生自主创新科研计划项目（12CX06003A）资助。

Genetic mechanisms of low permeability reservoirs of Qingshuihe Formation in Beisantai area, Junggar Basin

CAO Yingchang 1　YUAN Guanghui 1　WANG Yanzhong 1　XI Kelai 1　KUANG Lichun 2　WANG Xulong 2　JIA Xiyu 2　SONG Yong 2

Received:2012-02-14 Revised:2012-06-25 Online:2012-09-25 Published:2012-11-27

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

碎屑岩低渗透储层成因机制包括低渗透储层物性主控因素和储层致密史-油藏成藏史匹配关系两个方面。综合利用岩心观察、薄片鉴定、图像分析、扫描电镜观察、压汞与岩石物性测试等多种技术方法，对准噶尔盆地北三台地区下白垩统清水河组低渗透储层进行了研究。储层低渗透特征具有沉积作用主控、压实作用主导、溶蚀作用改善、胶结作用强化的特点。针对砂质砾岩—细砾岩、细砂岩、粉砂岩和泥质粉砂岩，以“储层成岩作用演化序列-储层孔隙结构”为约束进行地质历史时期储层物性的恢复，确定不同区带、不同岩性储层的低渗透形成时间，结合油藏成藏史及原油分布特征，分析清水河组低渗透储层成因机制。清水河组存在3类不同成因类型的储层，Ⅰ类为中渗成藏现今中渗储层、Ⅱ类为中渗成藏-现今（特）低渗储层、Ⅲ类为（特/超）低渗成藏现今（特/超）低渗储层；其中Ⅱ类细分出2个亚类，Ⅲ类细分出4个亚类。针对不同成因类型的（低渗透）储层，结合成藏时期储层渗透率特征、储层含油级别、原油特征及试油试采成果等，进行了钻前勘探潜力分析及有效开发增产措施的优选。

关键词: 准噶尔盆地, 低渗透储层, 成因机制, 主控因素, 致密史-成藏史

Abstract:

Genetic mechanisms of low-permeability clastic reservoirs include many controlling factors, such as low-permeability reservoir properties and a matching relationship between the reservoir compaction history and the hydrocarbon accumulation history. Currently, studies on the controlling factors of low-permeability reservoir properties have been relatively mature, while the matching relationship between the reservoir compaction history and the hydrocarbon accumulation history has been less studied. Therefore, we studied the Lower Cretaceous Qingshuihe Formation low-permeability reservoirs of the Beisantai area, Junggar Basin by means of core observation, thin section identification, image analysis, scanning electron microscopy observation, mercury penetration, petrophysical property testing and other technical methods. The result showed that the low-permeability reservoirs are characterized of being controlled by deposition, predominated by compaction, improved by dissolution and enhanced by cementation. Confined by “reservoir diagenesis evolutionary sequence and reservoir pore structure” conditions, physical properties of sandy-fine conglomerate, fine sandstone, siltstone and argillaceous siltstone reservoirs in geological history were restored, respectively, and the geological time when reservoirs with different lithology in different zones form low-permeability properties was determined based on the reservoir property evolutionary history. Genetic mechanisms of the Qingshuihe Formation low-permeability reservoirs were investigated in combination with the reservoir property evolutionary history, hydrocarbon accumulation history and distribution features of crude oils. The results showed that there exist three different genetic types of reservoirs in the Qingshuihe Formation. Type Ⅰ had medium permeability in the hydrocarbon accumulation period and remains in this permeability now. Type Ⅱ had medium permeability in the hydrocarbon accumulation period and shows low (extra- or super-low) permeability now. Type Ⅲ had low (extra- or super-low) permeability in the hydrocarbon accumulation period and remains in the permeability now. Moreover, type Ⅱ can be subdivided into two sub-types and type Ⅲ into four sub-types. Integrated with reservoir physical properties in the hydrocarbon accumulation period, oil-bearing grades of reservoirs, characteristics of crude oils and oil testing results, we analyzed the exploration potential of different genetic types of reservoirs before drilling, and optimized effective development and stimulation methods.

Key words: Junggar Basin, low-permeability reservoir, genetic mechanism, main controlling factor, compaction history-accumulation history

操应长　远光辉　王艳忠　葸克来　匡立春　王绪龙　贾希玉　宋　永. 准噶尔盆地北三台地区清水河组低渗透储层成因机制[J]. 石油学报, 2012, 33(5): 758-771.

CAO Yingchang　YUAN Guanghui　WANG Yanzhong　XI Kelai　KUANG Lichun. Genetic mechanisms of low permeability reservoirs of Qingshuihe Formation in Beisantai area, Junggar Basin[J]. Editorial office of ACTA PETROLEI SINICA, 2012, 33(5): 758-771.

参考文献

[1]蒋凌志，顾家裕，郭彬程.中国含油气盆地碎屑岩低渗透储层的特征及形成机理[J].沉积学报，2004，22（1）：13-18.

Jiang Lingzhi,Gu Jiayu,Guo Bincheng.Characteristics and mechanism of low permeability clastic reservoir in Chinese petroliferous basin[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2004,22（1）:13-18.

[2]陈国俊，吕成福，王琪，等.珠江口盆地深水区白云凹陷储层孔隙特征及影响因素[J].石油学报，2010,31（4）：566-572.

Chen Guojun,Lü Chengfu,Wang Qi,et al.Characteristics of pore evolution and its controlling factors of Baiyun Sag in deepwater area of Pearl River Mouth Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2010,31（4）：566-572.

[3]周勇，纪友亮，张善文，等.胶莱盆地莱阳凹陷莱阳组低渗透砂岩储层特征及物性控制因素[J].石油学报，2011,32（4）：611-620.

Zhou Yong,Ji Youliang,Zhang Shanwen,et al.Characteristics and controlling factors on physical properties of low-permeability sandstones of the Laiyang Formation in the Laiyang Sag,Jiaolai Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2011,32（4）：611-620.

[4]杨帆，孙玉善，谭秀成，等.迪那2气田古近系低渗透储集层形成机制分析[J].石油勘探与开发，2005，32（2）：39-42.

Yang Fan,Sun Yushan,Tan Xiucheng,et al.Formation mechanism of Paleogene low permeability reservoir in Dina 2 gas field,Tarim Basin[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2005,32（2）:39-42.

[5]刘伟，林承焰，王国民，等.柴西北地区油泉子油田低渗透储层特征与成因分析[J].石油学报，2009,30（3）：417-421.

Liu Wei,Lin Chengyan,Wang Guomin,et al.Characteristics of low permeability reservoir and its origin in Youquanzi Oilfield in the northwest part of Qaidam Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2009,30（3）：417-421.

[6]Higgs K E,Zwingmann H,Reyes A G,et al.Diagenesis,porosity evolution,and petroleum emplacement in tight gas reservoirs,Taranaki Basin,New Zealand [J].Journal of Sedimentary Research,2007,77:1003-1025.

[7]许建华，张世奇，罗晓容，等.羌塘盆地侏罗系低渗透碎屑岩储集层特征[J].地质科学，2008，43（3）：434-444.

Xu Jianhua,Zhang Shiqi,Luo Xiaorong,et al.Characteristics of the Jurassic low-permeable clastic reservoirs in the Qiangtang Basin[J].Chinese Journal of Geology,2008，43（3）:434-444.

[8]高静乐，宋广寿，高辉，等.西峰油田庄40区块长6储层特低渗透成因与主控因素[J].沉积学报，2008，26（4）：640-645.

Gao Jingle,Song Guangshou,Gao Hui,et al.Origin of extra low permeability and controlling factors of the Chang 6 reservoir in Zhuang 40 area of Xifeng oil field[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2008，26（4）:640-645.

[9]张荣虎，张惠良，寿建峰，等.库车坳陷大北地区下白垩统巴什基奇克组储层成因地质分析[J].地质科学，2008，43（3）：507-517.

Zhang Ronghu,Zhang Huiliang,Shou Jianfeng,et al.Geological analysis on reservoir mechanism of the Lower Cretaceous Bashijiaqike Formation in Dabei area of the Kuqa Depression[J].Chinese Journal of Geology,2008,43（3）:507-517.

[10]杨晓萍，赵文智，邹才能，等.低渗透储层成因机理及优质储层形成与分布[J].石油学报，2007，28（4）：57-61.

Yang Xiaoping,Zhao Wenzhi,Zou Caineng,et al.Origin of low-permeability reservoir and distribution of favorable reservoir[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2007,28（4）:57-61.

[11]Zhu Rukai,Zou Caineng,Zhang Nai,et al.Diagenetic fluids evolution and genetic mechanism of tight sandstone gas reservoirs in Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation in Sichuan Basin,China[J].Science in China Series D:Earth Sciences, 2008,51(9):1340-1353.

[12]姜振学，林世国，庞雄奇，等.两种类型致密砂岩气藏对比[J].石油实验地质，2006，28（3）：210-219.

Jiang Zhenxue,Lin Shiguo,Pang Xiongqi,et al.The comparison of two types of tight sand gas reservoir[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2006,28（3）:210-219.

[13]邓秀芹，刘新社，李士祥.鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组超低渗透储层致密史与油藏成藏史[J].石油与天然气地质，2009，30（2）：156-161.

Deng Xiuqin,Liu Xinshe,Li Shixiang.The relationship between compacting history and hydrocarbon accumulating history of the super-low permeability reservoirs in the Triassic Yanchang Formation in the Ordos Basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2009,30（2）:156-161.

[14]邱楠生，万晓龙，金之钧，等.渗透率级差对透镜状砂体成藏的控制模式[J].石油勘探与开发，2003，30（3）：48-52.

Qiu Nansheng,Wan Xiaolong,Jin Zhijun,et al.Controlling model of permeability difference on the hydrocarbon accumulation of sand lens reservoirs[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2003,30（3）:48-52.

[15]贺凯，朱跃胜，王震，等.准噶尔盆地东部白垩系成藏条件及勘探前景分析[J].新疆石油学院学报，2002，14(2)：6-9.

He Kai,Zhu Yuesheng,Wang Zhen,et al.The reservoir forming conditions and analysis of Cretaceous exploration prospect in the east of Junggar Basin[J].Journal of Xinjiang Petroleum Institute,2002,14(2):6-9.

[16]谷云飞，马明福，苏世龙，等.准噶尔盆地白垩系岩相古地理[J].石油实验地质，2003，25(4)：337-342.

Gu Yunfei,Ma Mingfu,Su Shilong,et al.Lithofacies paleogeography of the Cretaceous in the Junggar Basin[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2003,25(4):337-342.

[17]方世虎，宋岩，贾承造，等.准噶尔盆地白垩系底砾岩与油气成藏的关系[J].天然气工业，2006，26(5)：13-16.

Fang Shihu,Song Yan,Jia Chengzao,et al.Relationship between Cretaceous basal conglomerate and oil/gas reservoir in the Junggar Basin.[J].Nature Gas Industry,2006,26(5):13-16.

[18]朱爱国，帕尔哈提，王川燕.准噶尔盆地东部北三台地区白垩系地层沉积特征[J].新疆石油学院学报，2001,13（1）：1-6.

Zhu Aiguo,Parhati，Wang Chuanyan.Sedimentary features of the Cretaceous stratum in Beisantai area,eastern part of Junggar Basin[J].Journal of Xinjiang Petroleum Institute,2001,13（1）:1-6.

[19]高辉，宋广寿，孙卫，等.储层特低渗透成因分析与评价——以安塞油田沿25区块为例[J].地球科学进展，2007，22（11）：1134-1139.

Gao Hui,Song Guangshou ,Sun Wei,et al.Origin analysis of extra low permeability and evaluation for example reservoir in the Yan25 area of Ansai oil field [J].Advances in Earth Science,2007,22（11）:1134-1139.

[20]王艳忠.东营凹陷北带古近系次生孔隙发育带成因机制及演化模式[D].青岛：中国石油大学（华东），2010:91-98.

Wang Yanzhong.Genetic mechanism and evolution model of secondary pore development zone of Paleogene in the north zone in Dongying Depression[D].Qingdao:China University of Petroleum(East China),2010:91-98.

[21]寿建峰，张惠良，斯春松，等.砂岩动力成岩作用[M].北京：石油工业出版社，2005:27-34.

Shou Jianfeng,Zhang Huiliang,Si Chunsong,et al.Sandstone dynamical diagenesis[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 2005:27-34.

[22]王鑫，斯春松，朱国华，等.准噶尔盆地侏罗—白垩系煤系与非煤系储层成因模式与孔隙定量预测[J].中国石油勘探，2004，9（5）：45-52.

Wang Xin,Si Chunsong,Zhu Guohua,et al.Diagenetic patterns of Jurassic-Cretaceous coal measure and non-coal measure reservoirs and porous quantitative prediction in Junggra Basin[J].China Petroleum Exploration,2004,9（5）:45-52.

[23]Beard D C,Weyl P K.Influence of texture on porosity and permeability of unconsolidated sand[J].AAPG Bulletin,1973,57(2):349-369.

[24]宋岩，王喜双，房德权.准噶尔盆地含油气系统的形成与演化[J].石油学报，2000，21（4）：20-25.

Song Yan,Wang Xishuang,Fang Dequan.The formation and development of petroleum systems in Jungaar Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2000,21（4）:20-25.

[25]张义杰，柳广弟.准噶尔盆地复合油气系统特征、演化与油气勘探方向[J].石油勘探与开发，2002,29（1）：36-38.

Zhang Yijie,Liu Guangdi.Characteristics and evolution of composite petroleum systems and the exploration strategy in Junggar Basin,northwest China [J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2002,29（1）:36-38.

[26]曾军，康永尚，韩军，等.准噶尔盆地北三台西南斜坡带油气成藏分析[J].西南石油大学学报:自然科学版，2008，30（5）：53-57.

Zeng Jun,Kang Yongshang,Han Jun,et al.Analysis on formation of oil and gas pools in the area of southwest slope of Beisantai area,Junggar Basin[J].Journal of Southwest Petroleum University:Science and Technology Edition,2008,30（5）:53-57.

[27]贺凯，何贤英，王菁，等.准东探区白垩系成藏条件分析及勘探目标研究[R].克拉玛依：新疆油田勘探开发研究院， 2001.

He Kai,He Xianying,Wang Jing,et al.Analysis of reservoir forming condition and exploration targets in Cretaceous strata,Zhundong exploration area [R].Karamay:Research Institute of Exploration and Development,Xinjiang Oilfield Company,PetroChina,2001.

[28]罗立崇，刘得光，程显胜，等.准噶尔盆地三台-北三台地区第三系勘探潜力分析[J].新疆石油天然气，2006，3（2）：5-7.

Luo Lichong,Liu Deguang,Cheng Xiansheng,et al.Analyses on the third series prospection potential in Santai-North Santai area in Junggar Basin[J].Xinjiang Oil & Gas,2006，3（2）:5-7.

[29]操应长.东营凹陷沙河街组碎屑岩储层纵向演化及其量化表征研究[R].东营：胜利油田分公司地质科学研究院， 2010.

Cao Yingchang.Vertical evolution and quantitative characterization of clastic reservoirs in Shahejie Formation,Dongying Sag[R].Dongying:Geological Science Research Institute of Shengli oilfield,Sinopec,2010.

准噶尔盆地北三台地区清水河组低渗透储层成因机制

Genetic mechanisms of low permeability reservoirs of Qingshuihe Formation in Beisantai area, Junggar Basin

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	吴建发, 赵圣贤, 范存辉, 夏自强, 季春海, 张成林, 曹埒焰. 川南长宁地区龙马溪组富有机质页岩裂缝发育特征及其与含气性的关系[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(4): 428-446.
[2]	刘春, 陈世加, 赵继龙, 陈戈, 苏洲, 高乔. 远源油气成藏条件与富集主控因素——以库车坳陷南部斜坡带中生界-新生界油气藏为例[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(3): 307-318.
[3]	王杰青, 许淑梅, 任新成, 池鑫琪, 舒鹏程, 刘弦, 孔家豪. 准噶尔盆地腹部西侧侏罗系三工河组储层成岩作用及控制因素[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(3): 319-331.
[4]	代一丁, 牛子铖, 汪旭东, 王小龙, 肖张波, 张凯迪, 赵璇. 珠江口盆地陆丰凹陷古近系与新近系油气富集规律的差异及其主控因素[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(s1): 41-52.
[5]	朱筱敏, 葛家旺, 吴陈冰洁, 张向涛, 汪旭东, 李晓燕, 黎明. 珠江口盆地陆丰凹陷深层砂岩储层特征及主控因素[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(s1): 69-80.
[6]	鲁雪松, 赵孟军, 陈竹新, 李学义, 胡瀚文, 卓勤功. 准噶尔盆地南缘齐古油田油气成藏再认识及勘探启示[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(9): 1045-1058,1115.
[7]	刘刚, 卫延召, 陈棡, 贾开富, 龚德瑜, 王峰, 孙靖, 朱峰, 麻伟娇. 准噶尔盆地腹部侏罗系-白垩系次生油气藏形成机制及分布特征[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(8): 914-927.
[8]	田孝茹, 张元元, 卓勤功, 于志超, 郭召杰. 准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷下二叠统风城组致密油充注特征——碱性矿物中的流体包裹体证据[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(6): 646-659.
[9]	康永尚, 皇甫玉慧, 张兵, 邓泽, 毛得雷, 何志平, 王建, 袁春林. 含煤盆地深层“超饱和”煤层气形成条件[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(12): 1426-1438.
[10]	卢欢, 王清斌, 杜晓峰, 郭龙龙, 燕歌, 王夏斌, 刘军钊. 低渗透储层类型划分及储层敏感性主控因素——以渤海海域古近系为例[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(11): 1331-1345,1367.
[11]	厚刚福, 徐洋, 孙靖, 王力宝, 宋明星, 郭华军, 李亚哲, 陈扬. 三角洲前缘—湖盆深水区沉积模式及意义——以准噶尔盆地盆1井西凹陷三工河组二段一砂组为例[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(10): 1223-1232.
[12]	刘刚, 卫延召, 罗鸿成, 陈棡, 龚德瑜, 王峰, 孙靖, 贾开富. 准噶尔盆地陆西地区石南13井区侏罗系三工河组砂体结构及控藏作用[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(9): 1006-1018.
[13]	操应长, 杨田, 宋明水, 王艳忠, 马奔奔, 王健, 远光辉, 葸克来. 陆相断陷湖盆低渗透碎屑岩储层特征及相对优质储层成因——以济阳坳陷东营凹陷古近系为例[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(7): 727-743.
[14]	王鹏万, 邹辰, 李娴静, 蒋立伟, 李君军, 梅珏, 张朝, 李庆飞. 昭通示范区页岩气富集高产的地质主控因素[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(7): 744-753.
[15]	何登发, 邵东波, 崔永平, 包洪平, 开百泽, 傅定伍, 曹毓戈. 鄂尔多斯盆地西缘马家滩古隆起的厘定、成因及地质意义[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(6): 609-619.