基于卸压煤层气开发的构造煤储层孔渗特征与类型划分——以淮南矿区为例

doi:10.7623/syxb201304011

石油学报 ›› 2013, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (4): 712-719.DOI: 10.7623/syxb201304011

基于卸压煤层气开发的构造煤储层孔渗特征与类型划分——以淮南矿区为例

吴国代^1,2,3, 桑树勋⁴, 程军^1,2,3, 柳天均^1,2,3, 黄华州⁴, 任波⁴

1. 重庆地质矿产研究院国土资源部页岩气资源与勘查技术重点实验室重庆 400042;
2. 重庆地质矿产研究院重庆市页岩气资源与勘查工程技术研究中心重庆 400042;
3. 油气资源与探测国家重点实验室重庆页岩气研究中心重庆 400042;
4. 中国矿业大学资源与地球科学学院江苏徐州 221116

收稿日期:2013-01-16 修回日期:2013-04-08 出版日期:2013-07-25 发布日期:2013-07-04
通讯作者: 吴国代
作者简介:吴国代,男, 1982年10月生, 2007年获中国矿业大学学士学位,2010年获中国矿业大学硕士学位,现为重庆地质矿产研究院工程师,主要从事非常规油气、地球化学方面研究工作。Email:miahwu@qq.com
基金资助:
国家高技术研究发展计划(863)项目(2007AA06Z220)和教育部重大科学技术项目(307014)资助。

Poroperm characteristics and classification of tectonic coal beds for pressure-relieved methane exploitation：a case study on Huainan mining area

WU Guodai^1,2,3, SANG Shuxun⁴, CHENG Jun^1,2,3, LIU Tianjun^1,2,3, HUANG Huazhou⁴, REN Bo⁴

1. Key Laboratory for Shale Gas Resource & Exploration, Ministry of Land & Resources, Chongqing Institute of Geology & Mineral Resources, Chongqing 400042, China;
2. Chongqing Engineering Research Center for Shale Gas Resource & Exploration, Chongqing Institute of Geology & Mineral Resources, Chongqing 400042, China;
3. Chongqing Shale Gas Research Center, State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resource & Prospecting, Chongqing 400042, China;
4. School of Resource & Earth Science, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China

Received:2013-01-16 Revised:2013-04-08 Online:2013-07-25 Published:2013-07-04

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

在淮南矿区卸压煤层气地面开发取得积极进展的背景下,应用扫描电镜和汞注入法对淮南矿区构造煤样进行孔裂隙测试,结合井下煤层透气性和试井渗透率测试数据,探讨了构造煤储层孔渗特征。对比分析了卸压煤层气开采现场测试渗透率变化差异,揭示了构造煤卸压开采条件下影响煤层渗透率变化的影响因素及煤体结构差异对煤储层改造的控制作用,提出了构造煤储层类型划分方案。研究表明:随着构造变形的增强,煤中外生孔裂隙规模增大,孔容、中值孔径、孔隙度等参数增大,煤储层渗流孔含量与构造变形呈正相关,但地层条件下构造煤储层的渗流性受储层压力、煤体结构、地下水等因素控制。构造煤储层特性决定了当前原位煤层气开发技术的不可行性;而卸压煤层气开采有效解决了构造煤储层渗透率低、压力传递困难以及压裂改造效果差等技术难题,卸压开采对煤储层的改造导致的"卸压增透增流"效应主要受煤体结构控制。煤体变形越强,改造效果越好,基于不同煤体结构构造煤储层中渗流孔的含量与改造效果的一致性,认为糜棱煤是卸压煤层气开发的优质储层,碎粒煤是较优质储层,碎裂煤和鳞片状煤是一般储层,原生结构煤是不利储层。

关键词: 构造煤储层, 卸压煤层气开采, 煤体结构, 渗流孔, 渗透率

Abstract:

Against the background of progresses made in the ground exploitation of pressure-relieved methane in the Huainan mining area, we tested poricidal fracture systems of tectonic coals from this mining area by SEM and mercury injection, and discussed poroperm characteristics of tectonic coal beds based on well-testing data of penetrability and permeability of borehole coal seams. A comparative analysis of differences in permeability variations measured in practical exploitation of pressure-relieved methane was performed and it revealed influencing factors of permeability variations of tectonic coals under conditions of pressure-relieved exploitation and control effects of the coal texture difference on coal bed reworking, by doing so, a classification method of tectonic coal beds was introduced. The result indicates that with increasing structural deformation, the scale of exogenously poricidal fractures in coals increases, and correspondingly other parameters including pore volume, median aperture and porosity increase as well. The seepage pore content of coal beds is positively correlated with structural deformation, while seepage properties of real tectonic coal beds are controlled by pressure, coal texture, underground water, etc. Characteristics of tectonic coal beds make development techniques of in-situ CBM infeasible, while some problems encountered in CBM development, such as low permeability, difficulty in pressure transmission and poor effects of fracturing of coal beds, can be solved with techniques of pressure-relieved methane exploitation, The effect of "increasing permeability and fluidity by pressure relief" caused by reworking of coal beds in pressure-relieved methane exploitation is controlled mainly by coal textures,i.e. the stronger the coal deformation, the better the reworking effect. Based on the consistency of the seepage pore content of different coal textures in coal beds with the reworking effect, a mylonitic coal is considered to be a high-quality coal bed for pressure-relieved methane exploitation, a granulated coal comes next, fractured /scaly coals are ecumenic, while a coal with original texture is a poor coal bed for pressure-relieved methane exploitation.

Key words: tectonic coal bed, pressure-relieved CBM exploitation, coal texture, seepage pore, permeability

中图分类号:

TE112.115

吴国代, 桑树勋, 程军, 柳天均, 黄华州, 任波. 基于卸压煤层气开发的构造煤储层孔渗特征与类型划分——以淮南矿区为例[J]. 石油学报, 2013, 34(4): 712-719.

WU Guodai, SANG Shuxun, CHENG Jun, LIU Tianjun, HUANG Huazhou, REN Bo. Poroperm characteristics and classification of tectonic coal beds for pressure-relieved methane exploitation：a case study on Huainan mining area[J]. Editorial office of ACTA PETROLEI SINICA, 2013, 34(4): 712-719.

参考文献

[1] 袁亮.淮南矿区现代采矿关键技术[J].煤炭学报,2007,32(1):8-12.

Yuan Liang.Key technology for modern mining in Huainan coal area[J].Journal of China Coal Society,2007,32(1):8-12.

[2] 袁亮.卸压开采抽采瓦斯理论及煤与瓦斯共采技术体系[J].煤炭学报,2009,34(1):1-8.

Yuan Liang.Theory of pressure-relieved gas extraction and technique system of integrated coal production and gas extraction[J].Journal of China Coal Society,2009,34(1):1-8.

[3] 袁亮.低透气煤层群首采关键层卸压开采采空侧瓦斯分布特征与抽采技术[J].煤炭学报,2008,38(12):1362-1367.

Yuan Liang.Gas distribution of the mined-outside and extraction technology of first mined key seam relief-mining in gassy multi-seams of low permeability[ J].Journal of China Coal Society,2008,38(12):1362-1367.

[4] 石必明,俞启香,王凯.远程保护层开采上覆煤层透气性动态演化规律试验研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2006,25(9):1917-1921.

Shi Biming,Yu Qixiang,Wang Kai.Test research on coal seam permeability dynamic changing law by far-distance protecting stratum mining[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2006,25(9):1917-1921.

[5] 卢平,袁亮,程桦,等.低透气性煤层群高瓦斯采煤工作面强化抽采卸压瓦斯机理及试验[J].煤炭学报,2010,35(4):580-585.

Lu Ping,Yuan Liang,Cheng Hua,et al.Theory and experimental studies of enhanced gas drainage in the high-gas face of low permeability coal multi-seams[J].Journal of China Coal Society,2010,35(4):580-585.

[6] Sang Shuxun,Xu Hongjie,Fang Liangcai,et al.Stress relief coalbed methane drainage by surface vertical well in China[J].International Journal of Coal Geology,2010,82:196-203.

[7] 黄华州,桑树勋,方良才,等.采动区远程卸压煤层气抽采地面井产能影响因素[J].煤田地质与勘探,2010,38(2):18-22.

Huang Huazhou,Sang Shuxun,Fang Liangcai,et al.Analysis of productivity impact factors for coalbed methane drainage by remote pressure relief of surface well in mining area[J].Coal Geology & Eexploration,2010,38(2):18-22.

[8] 徐宏杰,桑树勋,韩家章,等.岩体结构与地面瓦斯抽采井稳定性的关系[J].采矿与安全工程学报,2011,28(1):90-95.

Xu Hongjie,Sang Shuxun,Han Jiazhang,et al.Relationship between rock mass structure and stability of surface well for released coal gas[J].Journal of Mining & Safety Engineering,2011,28(1):90-95.

[9] 杨陆武,孙茂远.中国煤层气藏的特殊性及其开发技术要求[J].天然气工业,2001,21(6):17-19.

Yang Luwu,Sun Maoyuan.Peculiarities of China CBM reservoirs and their dictation on CBM production technology[J].Natural Gas Industry,2001,21(6):17-19.

[10] 饶孟余,钟建华,杨陆武,等.无烟煤煤层气成藏与产气机理研究[J].石油学报,2004,25(4):23-28.

Rao Mengyu Zhong Jianhua,Yang Luwu,et al.Coalbed methane reservoir and gas production mechanism in anthracite coalbeds[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2004,25(4):23-28.

[11] 袁亮.淮南矿区煤矿煤层气抽采技术[J].中国煤层气,2006,3(1):6-10.

Yuan liang.Coal mine methane drainage technology in Huainan coal mining area[J].China Coalbed Methane,2006,3(1):6-10.

[12] 程远平,俞启香.煤层群煤与瓦斯安全高效共采体系及其应用[J].中国矿业大学学报,2003,32(5):471-475.

Cheng Yuanping,Yu Qixiang.Application of safe and high–efficient exploitation system of coal and gas in coal seams[J].Journal of China University of Mining and Technology,2003,32(5):471-475.

[13] 袁亮.松软低透煤层群瓦斯抽采理论与技术[M].北京:煤炭工业出版社,2004.

Yuan Liang.Theory and technology of gas drainage and capture in soft multiple coal seams of low permeability[M].Beijing:China Coal Industry Publishing House,2004.

[14] 袁亮.高瓦斯矿区复杂地质条件安全高效开采关键技术[J].煤炭学报,2006,31(2):174-178.

Yuan Liang.Key technique to high efficiency and safe mining in highly gassy mining area with complex geologic condition[J].Journal of China Coal Society,2006,31(2):174-178.

[15] 许家林,钱鸣高.地面钻井抽放上覆远距离卸压煤层气试验研究[J].中国矿业大学学报,2000,29(1):78-81.

Xu Jialin,Qian Minggao.Study on drainage of relieved methane from overlying coal seam far away from the protective seam by surface well[J].Journal of China University of Mining and Technology,2000,29(1):78-81.

[16] 钱鸣高,许家林,缪协兴.煤矿绿色开采技术[J].中国矿业大学学报,2003,32(4):343-348.

Qian Minggao,Xu Jialin,Miao Xiexing.Green technique in coal mining[J].Journal of China University of Mining and Technology,2003,32(4):343-348.

[17] 钱鸣高,缪协兴,许家林.资源与环境协调(绿色)开采[J].煤炭学报,2007,32(1):1-7.

Qian Minggao,Miao Xiexing,Xu Jialin.Green mining of coal resources harmonizing with environment[J].Journal of China Coal Society,2007,32(1):1-7.

[18] Sang Shuxun,Han Jiazhang,Cheng Zhizhong,et al.Surface vertical well technology for pressure relief coalbed methan exploitation in Huainan Coal Mining Area[C]//Proceedings of the 2008 Asia Pacific CBM Symposium.Austrilia,University of Queensland.2008.

[19] 张建国,苗耀,李梦溪,等. 沁水盆地煤层气水平井产能影响因素分析[J].中国石油勘探,2010,15(2):49-54.

Zhang Jianguo,Miao Yao,Li Mengxi,et al.Influential factors of CBM horizonml well productivity in Qinshui Basin[J].China Petroleum Exploration,2010,15(2):49-54.

[20] 袁崇孚.构造煤和煤与瓦斯突出[J].煤炭科学技术,1986,14(1):32-33.

Yuan Chongfu.Sheared coal and coal with gas outbursts[J].Coal Science and Technology,1986,14(1):32-33.

[21] 姜波,琚宜文.构造煤结构及其储层物性特征[J].天然气工业,2004,24(5):27-29.

Jiang Bo,Ju Yiwen.Tectonic coal structure and its petrophysical features[J].Natural Gas Industry,2004,24(5):27-29.

[22] 姜波,王桂梁,高元,等.淮南煤田逆冲叠瓦扇构造系统[J].煤田地质与勘探,1993,21(6):22-17.

Jiang Bo,Wang Guiliang,Gao Yuan,et al.Thrust imbricate fan tectonic system of Huainan Coal Filed[J].Coal Geology & Exploration,1993,21(6):22-17.

[23] Rodrigues C F, Lenos M J.The measurement of coal porosity with different gases[J].International Journal of Coal Geology,2002,48(3/4):245-281.

[24] 霍多特B B.煤与瓦斯突出[M].宋世钊译.北京:中国工业出版社,1996.

Khodot B B.Coal and gas outburst[M].Translated by Song Shizhao.Beijing :China Industry Publishing House,1996.

[25] 叶建平,史保生,张春才.中国煤储层渗透性及其主要影响因素[J].煤炭学报,1999,24(2):118-122.

Ye Jianping,Shi Baosheng,Zhang Chuncai.Coal reservoir permeambility and its controlled factors in China[J].Journal of China Coal Society,1999,24(2):118-122.

[26] 杨陆武,孙茂远,胡爱梅.适合中国煤层气藏特点的开发技术[J].石油学报,2002,23(4):46-50.

Yang Luwu,Sun Maoyuan,Hu Aimei.New technology series favorable to develop coal bed methane reservoirs in China[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2002,23(4):46-50.

[27] 王永辉,卢拥军,李永平,等.非常规储层压裂改造技术进展及应用[J].石油学报,2012,33(增1):149-158.

Wang Yonghui,Lu Yongjun,Li Yongping,et al.Progress and application of hydraulic fracturing technology in unconventional reservoir[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2012,33(z1):149-158.

[28] 陈振宏,王一兵,杨焦生,等.影响煤层气井产量的关键因素分析——以沁水盆地南部樊庄区块为例[J].石油学报,2009,30(3):409-412.

Chen Zhenhong,Wang Yibing,Yang Jiaosheng,et al.Influencing factors on coal-bed methane production of single well:a case of Fanzhuang Block in the south part of Qinshui Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2009,30(3):409-412.

[29] 钱鸣高,许家林.覆岩采动裂隙分布的"O"型圈特征研究[J].煤炭学报,1998,23(5):466-469.

Qian Minggao,Xu Jialin.Study on the" O-Shape"circle distribution characteristics of mining-induced fractures in the overlaying strata[J].Journal of China Coal Society,1998,23(5):466-469.

[30] 吴建国.芦岭煤矿卸压区瓦斯综合抽采试验及分析[J].煤田地质与勘探,2008,36(1):27-33.

Wu Jianguo.Integrated technology of coalbed methane drainage with ground well in Luling coal mine[J].Coal Geology & Exploration,2008,36(1):27-33.

[31] 王文,李化敏,熊祖强,等.平顶山矿区远程保护层开采保护效果试验分析[J].科学技术与工程,2011,11(4):719-722.

Wang Wen,Li Huamin,Xiong Zuqiang,et al.Test on the protective effect of far-distance protecting stratum mining in Pingdingshan Mining Area[J].Science Technology and Engineering,2011,11(4):719-722.

[32] 郭德勇,韩德馨,张建国.平顶山矿区构造煤分布规律及成因研究[J].煤炭学报,2002,27(3):249-253.

Guo Deyong,Han Dexin,Zhang Jianguo.Research on the occurrence and distribution of structural coal in Pingdingshan coal district[J].Journal of China Coal Society,2002,27(3):249-253.

基于卸压煤层气开发的构造煤储层孔渗特征与类型划分——以淮南矿区为例

Poroperm characteristics and classification of tectonic coal beds for pressure-relieved methane exploitation：a case study on Huainan mining area

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王千, 杨胜来, 拜杰, 赵卫, 李佳峻, 陈浩. CO₂驱油过程中孔喉结构对储层岩石物性变化的影响[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(5): 654-668,685.
[2]	王千, 杨胜来, 拜杰, 钱坤, 李佳峻. 非均质多层储层中CO₂驱替方式对驱油效果及储层伤害的影响[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(7): 875-884,902.
[3]	王清辉, 冯进, 管耀, 石磊, 潘卫国, 周开金, 杨清, 宋伟. 基于动态资料的低孔低渗砂岩储层渗透率测井评价方法——以陆丰凹陷古近系为例[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(s1): 206-216.
[4]	李俊键, 成宝洋, 刘仁静, 孟凡乐, 刘洋, 高亚军, 马康, 姜汉桥. 基于数字岩心的孔隙尺度砂砾岩水敏微观机理[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(5): 594-603.
[5]	高树生, 刘华勋, 叶礼友, 胡志明, 安为国. 页岩气井全生命周期物理模拟实验及数值反演[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(4): 435-444.
[6]	康永尚, 李喆, 王金, 孙良忠, 毛得雷, 孙晗森, 顾骄杨. 不同煤级区煤层气可动性和初始排水速度控制策略[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(10): 1162-1174.
[7]	钟德康. 多次幂指数型广义水驱特征曲线的建模和应用[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38(3): 333-341.
[8]	杜庆龙. 长期注水开发砂岩油田储层渗透率变化规律及微观机理[J]. 石油学报, 2016, 37(9): 1159-1164.
[9]	白松涛, 程道解, 万金彬, 杨林, 彭洪立, 郭笑锴, 曾静波. 砂岩岩石核磁共振T₂谱定量表征[J]. 石油学报, 2016, 37(3): 382-391,414.
[10]	谭学群, 廉培庆, 张俊法, 王鸣川, 李艳华, 杜秀娟, 王桐. 基于“二次震控”的三维油藏建模新方法[J]. 石油学报, 2016, 37(12): 1518-1527.
[11]	李松, 汤达祯, 许浩, 陶树, 邵国良, 任鹏飞. 应力条件制约下不同埋深煤储层物性差异演化[J]. 石油学报, 2015, 36(s1): 68-75.
[12]	李丹琼, 张士诚, 张遂安, 杨立源, 肖凤朝. 基于煤系渗透率各向异性测试的水平井穿层压裂效果模拟[J]. 石油学报, 2015, 36(8): 988-994.
[13]	胡伟, 杨胜来, 翟羽佳, 朱光亚, 万敏, 王伟. 油-水相对渗透率曲线优化校正新方法[J]. 石油学报, 2015, 36(7): 871-875.
[14]	李相臣, 康毅力, 周来诚, 战丽颖. 水饱和煤岩储层甲烷运移动态特征[J]. 石油学报, 2015, 36(7): 876-881.
[15]	童凯军, 张迎春, 戴卫华, 郑浩, 聂玲玲, 王月杰. 天然气驱油藏开发动态评价及可采储量预测新方法[J]. 石油学报, 2015, 36(6): 740-747.