测量页岩径向渗透率和孔隙度的新方法

doi:10.7623/syxb201504009

石油学报 ›› 2015, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (4): 482-489.DOI: 10.7623/syxb201504009

测量页岩径向渗透率和孔隙度的新方法

杨泽皓¹, 董明哲^1,2, 宫厚健¹, 李亚军¹, 徐龙¹

1. 中国石油大学石油工程学院山东青岛 266580;
2. Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB Canada T2N 1N4

收稿日期:2014-11-05 修回日期:2015-02-16 出版日期:2015-04-25 发布日期:2015-04-04
通讯作者: 董明哲,男,1956年2月生,1982年毕业于西北大学化工系,1995年获加拿大滑铁卢大学博士学位,现为中国石油大学(华东)特聘教授、博士生导师、国家"千人计划"专家,主要从事多孔介质多相流动和表面化学及其在油气田开发中的应用研究。Email:dongmz@upc.edu.cn
作者简介:杨泽皓,男,1988年12月生,2012年获得中国石油大学(华东)学士学位,现为中国石油大学(华东)石油工程学院博士研究生,主要从事非常规油气藏开采及渗流模型研究。Email:haoxiaotian1212@foxmail.com
基金资助:
国家重点基础研究发展计划(973)项目(2014CB239103)、国家自然科学基金项目(No.51204198,No.51274225)和中国石油大学(华东)研究生创新工程资助项目(YCX2015017)资助。

A new method to measure radial permeability and porosity of shale

Yang Zehao¹, Dong Mingzhe^1,2, Gong Houjian¹, Li Yajun¹, Xu Long¹

1. School of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum, Shandong Qingdao 266580, China;
2. Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary AB Canada T2N 1N4, Canada

Received:2014-11-05 Revised:2015-02-16 Online:2015-04-25 Published:2015-04-04

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为了更加方便准确地获得页岩径向的渗透率,提出了一种测量页岩径向渗透率和孔隙度的压力衰减新方法。该方法通过实验得到氦气沿页岩径向流动时,岩心与PVT容器内壁之间环形空间的压力衰减曲线;据此建立了相应数学模型,求得了径向模型中压力和时间的半解析解关系式;并通过对实验结果进行拟合,得到了页岩的浓度传导系数和孔隙度;利用浓度传导系数和渗透率的关系,得到了页岩径向方向的渗透率值。利用该方法对2块岩心分别在3组不同的环形空间初始压力下进行了渗透率和孔隙度的测量,并与传统的Dicker和Smits压力衰减方法对比了渗透率测试结果,采用常规的孔隙度测量仪对比了孔隙度测试结果,从而验证该方法的可行性和优越性。该方法相对于传统压力衰减方法除了具有仪器设备更简单、操作更简洁的优势外,还能够同时得到页岩径向渗透率和孔隙度。

关键词: 页岩, 径向, 压力衰减, 浓度传导系数, 渗透率, 孔隙度

Abstract:

In order to more conveniently and accurately obtain the radial permeability of shale, a new method was proposed to measure the pressure attenuation of radial permeability and porosity of shale. Based on experiments, this method can be used to obtain the pressure attenuation curve in annular space between the core and inner wall of PVT vessel in case of the radial flow of helium along shale. Accordingly, a mathematical model was established to achieve the semi-analytical relation between pressure and time in radial model. Meanwhile, experimental results were fitted to obtain the concentration conductivity and porosity of shale, so as to further derive the radial permeability of shale. This method was adopted to measure the permeability and porosity of two cores under three sets of different initial pressures in annular space. The permeability test results were also compared with those obtained by conventional Dicker and Smits pressure-attenuation methods. The conventional porosimeter was used for comparison in porosity test, thus validating the feasibility and superiority of this method. Compared with conventional pressure-attenuation methods, this model presents the advantages of simple equipment and operation to obtain the radial permeability and porosity of shale simultaneously.

Key words: shale, radial direction, pressure attenuation, concentration conductivity coefficient, permeability, porosity

中图分类号:

TE311

杨泽皓, 董明哲, 宫厚健, 李亚军, 徐龙. 测量页岩径向渗透率和孔隙度的新方法[J]. 石油学报, 2015, 36(4): 482-489.

Yang Zehao, Dong Mingzhe, Gong Houjian, Li Yajun, Xu Long. A new method to measure radial permeability and porosity of shale[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2015, 36(4): 482-489.

参考文献

[1] 张东晓,杨婷云.页岩气开发综述[J].石油学报,2013,34(4):792-801.
Zhang Dongxiao,Yang Tingyun.An overview of shale-gas production[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2013,34(4):792-801.
[2] 郭少斌,王义刚.鄂尔多斯盆地石炭系本溪组页岩气成藏条件及勘探潜力[J].石油学报,2013,34(3):445-452.
Guo Shaobin,Wang Yigang.Shale gas accumulation conditions and exploration potential of Carboniferous Benxi Formation in Ordos Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2013,34(3):445-452.
[3] Brace W F,Walsh J B,Frangos W T.Permeability of granite under high pressure[J].Journal of Geophysical Research,1968,73(6):2225-2236.
[4] Lin W.Compressible fluid flow through rocks of variable permeability[R].Livermore:University of California,1977.
[5] Hsieh P A,Tracy J V,Neuzil C E,et al.A transient laboratory method for determining the hydraulic properties of 'tight' rocks:I.Theory[J].International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts,1981,18(3):245-252.
[6] Bourbie T,Walls J.Pulse decay permeability:analytical solution and experimental test[J].Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal,1982,22(5):719-721.
[7] Dicker A I,Smits R M.A practical approach for determining permeability from laboratory pressure-pulse decay measurements[R].SPE 17578,1988.
[8] Haskett S E,Narahara G M,Holditch S A.A method for simultaneous determination of permeability and porosity in low-permeability cores[J].SPE Formation Evaluation,1988,3(3):651-658.
[9] Jones S C.A technique for faster pulse-decay permeability measurements in tight rocks[J].SPE Formation Evaluation,1997,12(1):19-25.
[10] Zhang M,Takahashi M,Morin R H,et al.Evaluation and application of the transient-pulse technique for determining the hydraulic properties of low-permeability rocks-Part 1:theoretical evaluation[J].Geotechnical Testing Journal,2000,23(1):83-90.
[11] Zhang Ming,Takahashi M,Morin R H,et al.Evaluation and application of the transient-pulse technique for determining the hydraulic properties of low-permeability rocks:Part 2:Experimental application[J].Geotechnical Testing Journal,2000,23(1):91-99.
[12] Liang Yan,Price J D,Wark D A,et al.Nonlinear pressure diffusion in a porous medium:approximate solutions with applications to permeability measurements using transient pulse decay method[J].Journal of Geophysical Research:Solid Earth,2001,106(B1):529-535.
[13] Li Shuliang,Dong Mingzhe,Dai Liming,et al.Determination of gas permeability of tight reservoir cores without using Klinkenberg correlation[R].SPE 88472,2004.
[14] Comisky J T,Newsham K E,Rushing J A,et al.A comparative study of capillary-pressure-based empirical models for estimating absolute permeability in tight gas sands[R].SPE 110050,2007.
[15] Fedor F,Hámos G,Jobbik A,et al.Laboratory pressure pulse decay permeability measurement of Boda Claystone,Mecsek Mts.,SW Hungary[J].Physics and Chemistry of the Earth,Parts A/B/C,2008,33:S45-S53.
[16] Cui X,Bustin A M M,Bustin R M.Measurements of gas permeability and diffusivity of tight reservoir rocks:different approaches and their applications[J].Geofluids,2009,9(3):208-223.
[17] Sarker R,Batzle M,Lu N.Determination of fluid permeability and specific storage in tight rocks from 1-D diffusion induced by constant rate fluid injection[R].SEG 2009,2009.
[18] Civan F,Rai C S,Sondergeld C H.Shale permeability determined by simultaneous analysis of multiple pressure-pulse measurements obtained under different conditions:north American unconventional gas conference and exhibition[R].SPE 144253,2011.
[19] Guo C H,He X,Bai B J,et al.Study on Gas Permeability in Nano Pores of Shale Gas Reservoirs[R].SPE 167179,2013.
[20] Xue H,Ehlig-Economides C.Permeability estimation from fracture calibration test analysis in shale and tight gas[R].SPE 168689,2013.
[21] Dong M Z,Li Z W,Li S L,et al.Permeabilities of tight reservoir cores determined for gaseous and liquid CO₂ and C₂H₆ using minimum backpressure method[J].Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering,2012,5:1-5.
[22] 郝石生,黄志龙,杨家琦.天然气运聚动平衡及其应用[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1994:3-55.
Hao Shisheng,Huang Zhilong,Yang Jiaqi.Dynamic balance of natural gas migration and accumulation and its application[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,1994:3-55.
[23] Zhang Y P,Hyndman C L,Maini B B.Measurement of gas diffusivity in heavy oils[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,2000,25(1/2):37-47.
[24] Etminan S R,Pooladi-Darvish M,Maini B B,et al.Modeling the interface resistance in low soluble gaseous solvents-heavy oil systems[J].Fuel,2013,105:672-687.
[25] Behzadfar E,Hatzikiriakos S G.Diffusivity of CO₂ in bitumen:pressure-decay measurements coupled with rheometry[J].Energy Fuels,2014,28(2):1304-1311.
[26] Etminan S R,Maini B B,Chen Z X.Determination of mass transfer parameters in solvent-based oil recovery techniques using a non-equilibrium boundary condition at the interface[J].Fuel,2014,120:218-232.
[27] Kavousi A,Torabi F,Chan C W,et al.Experimental measurement and parametric study of CO₂ solubility and molecular diffusivity in heavy crude oil systems[J].Fluid Phase Equilibria,2014,371:57-66.
[28] Crank J.The mathematics of diffusion[M].Oxford:Clarendon Press,1975.
[29] Stroud L,Miller J E,Brandt L W.Compressibility of helium at -10° to 130° F.and pressures to 4000 P.S.I.A[J].Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data,1960,5(1):51-52.
[30] Lee A L,Gonzalez M H,Eakin B E.Viscosity Of methane-n-decane mixtures[J].Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data,1966,11(3):281-287.
[31] Gracki J A,Flynn G P,Ross J.Viscosity of nitrogen,helium,hydrogen,and argon from -100 to 25℃ up to 150-250 atmosphere[J].The Journal of Chemical Physics,1969,51(9):3856-3863.
[32] McCarty R D.Thermodynamic properties of helium 4 from 2 to 1500 K at pressures to 108 Pa[J].Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data,1973,2(4):923-1042.
[33] Ghabezloo S,Sulem J,Guédon S,et al.Effective stress law for the permeability of a limestone[J].International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences,2009,46(2):297-306.

测量页岩径向渗透率和孔隙度的新方法

A new method to measure radial permeability and porosity of shale

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	付锁堂, 金之钧, 付金华, 李士祥, 杨伟伟. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组7段从致密油到页岩油认识的转变及勘探开发意义[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(5): 561-569.
[2]	王千, 杨胜来, 拜杰, 赵卫, 李佳峻, 陈浩. CO₂驱油过程中孔喉结构对储层岩石物性变化的影响[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(5): 654-668,685.
[3]	糜利栋. 基于产气剖面的页岩气离散裂缝网络反演方法[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(4): 481-491.
[4]	张建国, 姜在兴, 刘立安, 袁方, 冯路尧, 李长昇. 渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷沙河街组三段下亚段细粒沉积岩岩相特征与沉积演化[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(3): 293-306.
[5]	赵贤正, 蒲秀刚, 周立宏, 金凤鸣, 韩国猛, 时战楠, 韩文中, 丁娱娇, 张伟, 王国娜, 刘学伟, 汪虎. 深盆湖相区页岩油富集理论、勘探技术及前景——以渤海湾盆地黄骅坳陷古近系为例[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(2): 143-162.
[6]	游利军, 康毅力, 周洋, 陈强, 程秋洋, 徐洁明, 陈杨. 油气储层氧敏性概念、机理与意义[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(2): 186-197.
[7]	何骁, 吴建发, 雍锐, 赵圣贤, 周小金, 张洞君, 张德良, 钟成旭. 四川盆地长宁—威远区块海相页岩气田成藏条件及勘探开发关键技术[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(2): 259-272.
[8]	匡立春, 侯连华, 杨智, 吴松涛. 陆相页岩油储层评价关键参数及方法[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(1): 1-14.
[9]	梁兴, 徐政语, 张介辉, 张朝, 李兆丰, 蒋佩, 蒋立伟, 朱斗星, 刘臣. 浅层页岩气高效勘探开发关键技术——以昭通国家级页岩气示范区太阳背斜区为例[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(9): 1033-1048.
[10]	陈浩, 周涛, 樊怀才, 张鉴, 杨胜来. 页岩储层人工裂缝岩样制备方法及应力敏感性[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(9): 1117-1126.
[11]	周立宏, 韩国猛, 马建英, 陈长伟, 杨飞, 张莉华, 周可佳, 陈双清, 杨帆, 董越崎, 周静. 歧口凹陷西南缘沙河街组一段下亚段古环境特征与沉积模式[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(8): 903-917.
[12]	李俊乾, 卢双舫, 张鹏飞, 李文镖, 荆铁亚, 冯文俊. 页岩基质孔隙水定量表征及微观赋存机制[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(8): 979-990.
[13]	付锁堂, 付金华, 牛小兵, 李士祥, 吴志宇, 周新平, 刘江艳. 庆城油田成藏条件及勘探开发关键技术[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(7): 777-795.
[14]	王千, 杨胜来, 拜杰, 钱坤, 李佳峻. 非均质多层储层中CO₂驱替方式对驱油效果及储层伤害的影响[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(7): 875-884,902.
[15]	赵贤正, 周立宏, 蒲秀刚, 时战楠, 韩国猛, 吴佳朋, 韩文中, 张伟, 高欢欢, 马建英, 汪虎. 歧口凹陷歧北次凹沙河街组三段页岩油地质特征与勘探突破[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(6): 643-657.