基于岩石物理的致密砂岩油藏叠前优势储层预测——以渤海湾盆地南堡凹陷4号构造东营组二段为例

doi:10.7623/syxb201707006

石油学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (7): 793-803.DOI: 10.7623/syxb201707006

基于岩石物理的致密砂岩油藏叠前优势储层预测——以渤海湾盆地南堡凹陷4号构造东营组二段为例

张建坤¹, 吴吉忠¹, 徐文会¹, 吴开龙¹, 臧梅², 邢文军¹

1. 中国石油冀东油田公司勘探开发研究院河北唐山 063004;
2. 中国石油大庆钻探工程公司物探一公司研究院黑龙江大庆 163357

收稿日期:2016-10-23 修回日期:2017-04-27 出版日期:2017-07-25 发布日期:2017-08-10
通讯作者: 张建坤,男,1984年3月生,2007年获长江大学学士学位,2014年获中国地质大学(武汉)博士学位,现为中国石油冀东油田公司勘探开发研究院工程师,主要从事地震岩石物理、地震资料构造解释及地震沉积学方面的研究工作。Email:sparkler1984@126.com
作者简介:张建坤,男,1984年3月生,2007年获长江大学学士学位,2014年获中国地质大学(武汉)博士学位,现为中国石油冀东油田公司勘探开发研究院工程师,主要从事地震岩石物理、地震资料构造解释及地震沉积学方面的研究工作。Email:sparkler1984@126.com
基金资助:
国家重大科技专项（2016ZX05006-006）资助。

Pre-stack favorable reservoir prediction in tight sandstone reservoirs based on rock physics:a case study of the 2nd Member of Dongying Formation,Structure 4,Nanpu sag,Bohai Bay Basin

Zhang Jiankun¹, Wu Jizhong¹, Xu Wenhui¹, Wu Kailong¹, Zang Mei², Xing Wenjun¹

1. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, PetroChina Jidong Oilfield Company, Hebei Tangshan 063004, China;
2. Research Institute of No.1 Geophysical Exploration Company, PetroChina Daqing Drilling Engineering Corporation, Heilongjiang Daqing 163357, China

Received:2016-10-23 Revised:2017-04-27 Online:2017-07-25 Published:2017-08-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

针对致密砂岩油层与围岩波阻抗叠置严重、油层与围岩区分难度大等问题，应用岩石物理建模与分析、地震正演模拟、叠前弹性参数反演、贝叶斯岩相判别等技术对渤海湾盆地南堡凹陷4号构造东营组二段致密砂岩油藏优势储层进行预测。在测井资料预处理基础上，依据Biot-Gassmann理论，对Xu-White模型所需岩石物理参数进行计算，并正演估算弹性参数。采用Biot-Gassmann方程与Brie经验公式进行流体替换，建立岩石物理解释量版，进而优选出致密砂岩储层敏感弹性参数；同时根据不同地质模型与AVO正演模拟，确定储层预测极限厚度、有效目标和反演方法。最后利用贝叶斯判别方法计算叠前弹性参数反演成果的岩相类型概率分布，对有利孔隙砂岩分布进行预测。结果表明：油藏状态下纵横波速度比和纵波阻抗为最敏感的岩石弹性参数，对砂岩、泥岩具有区分能力；储层预测的有效目标是地震可识别层段内具有厚度比例优势的有利孔隙砂岩，叠前弹性参数反演和岩性与流体概率分析是解决研究区优势储层预测的有效方法；应用该方法预测的有利孔隙砂岩分布与实钻井吻合度高，储层分布规律与研究区地质规律一致，提高了油层识别能力及预测精度。

关键词: 岩石物理, 优势储层, 致密砂岩油藏, 叠前弹性参数反演, 岩性与流体概率预测, 南堡凹陷

Abstract:

Aiming at the serious wave impedance superposition between tight sandstone oil reservoirs and surrounding rocks, large difficulty in distinguishing oil-bearing layers and surrounding rocks and other problems, the technologies such as modeling and analysis, seismic forward modeling, pre-stack elastic parameter inversion, and Bayesian discrimination are used to predict the favorable reservoir of tight sandstone oil reservoir in the 2nd Member of Dongying Formation, Structure 4, Nanpu sag, Bohai Bay Basin. Based on logging data preprocessing and Biot-Gassmann theory, a calculation was performed on the petrophysical parameters required by Xu-White model, followed by a forward estimation on elastic parameters. Fluid substitution is conducted by Biot-Gassmann equation and Brie empirical equation, and then rock physics interpretation template is established to select the optimal sensitive elastic parameters of tight sandstone oil reservoir. Meanwhile, the limited thickness, effective target and inversion methods are determined for reservoir prediction according to the forward modeling between different geological models and AVO. Finally, Bayesian discriminating method is used to calculate the lithofacies types probability distribution of pre-stack elastic parameter inversion results, so as to predict the favorable porous sandstone distribution. The results demonstrate that under reservoir oil-bearing conditions, the ratio of P-wave velocity and S-wave velocity and P-wave impedance are the most sensitive rock elastic parameters to distinguish sandstone and mudstone. The effective target of reservoir prediction is the favorable porous sandstone with thickness proportional odds in the objective intervals which could be identified by seismic data. Pre-stack elastic parameter inversion and litho-fluid probability analysis are the effective methods for predicting favorable reservoirs in the study area. The favorable porous sandstone distribution predicted using the method in this study is highly consistent with the actual drilling results, and the reservoir distribution laws are in accordance with regional geological laws, greatly enhancing the oil-layer identification ability and prediction accuracy.

Key words: rock physics, favorable reservoir, tight sandstone oil reservoir, pre-stack elastic parameter inversion, lithology and fluid probability prediction, Nanpu sag

中图分类号:

TE122.2

张建坤, 吴吉忠, 徐文会, 吴开龙, 臧梅, 邢文军. 基于岩石物理的致密砂岩油藏叠前优势储层预测——以渤海湾盆地南堡凹陷4号构造东营组二段为例[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38(7): 793-803.

Zhang Jiankun, Wu Jizhong, Xu Wenhui, Wu Kailong, Zang Mei, Xing Wenjun. Pre-stack favorable reservoir prediction in tight sandstone reservoirs based on rock physics:a case study of the 2nd Member of Dongying Formation,Structure 4,Nanpu sag,Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2017, 38(7): 793-803.

参考文献

[1] 叶素娟,李嵘,杨克明,等.川西坳陷叠覆型致密砂岩气区储层特征及定量预测评价[J].石油学报,2015,36(12):1484-1494.
YE Sujuan,LI Rong,YANG Keming,et al.Characteristics and quantitative prediction of tight sand gas reservoirs in superimposed tight sandstone gas-bearing area,western Sichuan depression[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2015,36(12):1484-1494.
[2] 葸克来,操应长,朱如凯,等.吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组致密油储层岩石类型及特征[J].石油学报,2015,36(12):1495-1507.
XI Kelai,CAO Yingchang,ZHU Rukai,et al.Rock types and characteristics of tight oil reservoir in Permian Lucaogou Formation,Jimsar sag[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2015,36(12):1495-1507.
[3] 代全齐,罗群,张晨,等.基于核磁共振新参数的致密油砂岩储层孔隙结构特征——以鄂尔多斯盆地延长组7段为例[J].石油学报,2016,37(7):887-897.
DAI Quanqi,LUO Qun,ZHANG Chen,et al.Pore structure characteristics of tight-oil sandstone reservoir based on a new parameter measured by NMR experiment:a case study of seventh Member in Yanchang Formation,Ordos Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2016,37(7):887-897.
[4] 刘春,张荣虎,张惠良,等.致密砂岩储层微孔隙成因类型及地质意义——以库车前陆冲断带超深层储层为例[J].石油学报,2017,38(2):150-159.
LIU Chun,ZHANG Ronghu,ZHANG Huiliang,et al.Genetic types and geological significance of micro pores in tight sandstone reservoirs:a case study of the ultra-deep reservoir in the Kuqa foreland thrust belt,NW China[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2017,38(2):150-159.
[5] 石玉江,潘保芝,蒋必辞,等.小波分析在致密砂岩气层识别中的应用[J].地球科学,2016,41(12):2127-2135.
SHI Yujiang,PAN Baozhi,JIANG Bici,et al.Application of wavelet analysis in identification of tight sandstone gas reservoirs[J].Earth Science,2016,41(12):2127-2135.
[6] 任大忠,孙卫,黄海,等.鄂尔多斯盆地姬塬油田长6致密砂岩储层成因机理[J].地球科学,2016,41(10):1735-1744.
REN Dazhong,SUN Wei,HUANG Hai,et al.Formation mechanism of Chang 6 tight sandstone reservoir in Jiyuan oilfield,Ordos Basin[J].Earth Science,2016,41(10):1735-1744.
[7] 刘金库,彭军,石岩,等.致密砂岩储层石英溶蚀成因及对孔隙发育的影响——以川中-川南过渡带须家河组为例[J].石油学报,2015,36(9):1090-1097.
LIU Jinku,PENG Jun,SHI Yan,et al.The genesis of quartz dissolution in tight sand reservoirs and its impact on pore development:a case study of Xujiahe Formation in the transitional zone of Central-Southern Sichuan Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2015,36(9):1090-1097.
[8] 王改云,刘金萍,简晓玲,等.北黄海盆地下白垩统致密砂岩储层特征及成因[J].地球科学,2016,41(3):523-532.
WANG Gaiyun,LIU Jinping,JIAN Xiaoling,et al.Characteristics and genetic mechanism of tight sandstone reservoirs of lower Crataceous in north yellow sea basin[J].Earth Science,2016,41(3):523-532.
[9] 郭迎春,宋岩,庞雄奇,等.连续型致密砂岩气近源累计聚集的特征及成因机制[J].地球科学,2016,41(3):433-440.
GUO Yingchun,SONG Yan,PANG Xiongqi,et al.Characteristics and genetic mechanism of near-source accumulated accumulation for continuous-type tight-sand gas[J].Earth Science,2016,41(3):433-440.
[10] 黄欣芮,黄建平,李振春.基于双重孔隙理论的各向异性致密油砂岩地震岩石物理模型[J].石油学报,2015,36(10):1248-1259.
HUANG Xinrui,HUANG Jianping,LI Zhenchun.Anisotropic seismic rock physics model of tight oil sandstone based on double-porosity theory[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2015,36(10):1248-1259.
[11] 朱华银,徐轩,安来志,等.致密气藏孔隙水赋存状态与流动性实验[J].石油学报,2016,37(2):230-236.
ZHU Huayin,XU Xuan,AN Laizhi,et al.An experimental on occurrence and mobility of pore water in tight gas reservoirs[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2016,37(2):230-236.
[12] 邓少贵,牛云峰,赵岳,等.致密含气砂岩核磁共振-声波速度联合实验[J].石油学报,2016,37(6):768-776.
DENG Shaogui,NIU Yunfeng,ZHAO Yue,et al.Nuclear magnetic resonance-acoustic velocity joint experiment of tight gas sandstone[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2016,37(6):768-776.
[13] 宗兆云,印兴耀,吴国忱.基于叠前地震纵横波模量直接反演的流体检测方法[J].地球物理学报,2012,55(1):284-292.
ZONG Zhaoyun,YIN Xingyao,WU Guochen.Fluid identification method based on compressional and shear modulus direct inversion[J].Chinese Journal of Geophysics,2012,55(1):284-292.
[14] 许翠霞,马朋善,赖令彬,等.致密砂岩含气性敏感参数——以松辽盆地英台气田营城组为例[J].石油勘探与开发,2014,41(6):712-716.
XU Cuixia,MA Pengshan,LAI Lingbin,et al.Sensitivity parameters of tight sand gas:a case study of Lower Cretaceous Yingcheng Formation of Yingtai gas field in Songliao Basin,NE China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2014,41(6):712-716.
[15] 晏信飞,曹宏,姚逢昌,等.致密砂岩储层贝叶斯岩性判别与孔隙流体检测[J].石油地球物理勘探,2012,47(6):945-950.
YAN Xinfei,CAO Hong,YAO Fengchang,et al.Bayesian lithofacies discrimination and pore fluid detection in tight sandstone reservoirs[J].Oil Geophysical Prospecting,2012,47(6):945-950.
[16] 刘兴业,陈小宏,李景叶,等.基于核贝叶斯判别法的储层物性参数预测[J].石油学报,2016,37(7):878-886.
LIU Xingye,CHEN Xiaohong,LI Jingye,et al.Reservoir physical property prediction based on kernel-Bayes discriminant method[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2016,37(7):878-886.
[17] 姜仁,曾庆才,黄家强,等.岩石物理分析在叠前储层预测中的应用[J].石油地球物理勘探,2014,49(2):322-328.
JIANG Ren,ZENG Qingcai,HUANG Jiaqiang,et al.Application of rock physics analysis in pre-stack seismic reservoir prediction[J].Oil Geophysical Prospecting,2014,49(2):322-328.
[18] 印兴耀,刘欣欣.储层地震岩石物理建模研究现状与进展[J].石油物探,2016,55(3):309-325.
YIN Xingyao,LIU Xinxin.Research status and progress of the seismic rock-physics modeling methods[J].Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum,2016,55(3):309-325.
[19] 任科英.实验室岩心声学速度测试中的频散现象[J].石油地球物理勘探,2011,46(5):779-782.
REN Keying.Velocity dispersion of ultrasonic core measurement in laboratory[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting,2011,46(5):779-782.
[20] 印兴耀,宗兆云,吴国忱.岩石物理驱动下地震流体识别研究[J].中国科学:地球科学,2015,45(1):8-21.
YIN Xingyao,ZONG Zhaoyun,WU Guochen.Research on seismic fluid identification driven by rock physics[J].Science China Earth Sciences,2015,58(2):159-171.
[21] BIOT M A.Theory of propagation of elastic waves in a fluid-saturated porous solid.I.Low-frequency range[J].The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,1956,28(2):168-178.
[22] XU Shiyu,WHITE R E.A new velocity model for clay-sand mixtu res[J].Geophysical Prospecting,1995,43(1):91-118.
[23] GASSMANN F.Elastic waves through a packing of spheres[J].Geophysics,1951,16(4):673-685.
[24] KUSTER G T,TOKS? Z M N.Velocity and attenuation of seismic waves in two-phase media:Part I.Theoretical formulations[J].Geophysics,1974,39(5):587-606.
[25] KUSTER G T,TOKS? Z M N.Velocity and attenuation of seismic waves in two-phase media:Part Ⅱ.Experimental results[J].Geophysics,1974,39(5):607-618.
[26] KEYS R G,XU Shiyu.An approximation for the Xu-White velocity model[J].Geophysics,2002,67(5):1406-1414.
[27] B ERRYMAN J G.Single-scattering approximations for coefficients in Biot's equations of poroelasticity[J].The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1992,91(2):551-571.
[28] WYLLIE M R J,GREGORY A R,GARDNER G H F.An experimental investigation of factors affecting elastic wave velocities in porous media[J].Geophysics,1958,23(3):459-493.
[29] HILL R.The elastic behaviour of a crystalline aggregate[J].Proceedings of the Physical Society.Section A,1952,65(5):349-354.
[30] BATZLE M,WANG Zhijing.Seismic properties of pore fluids[J].Geophysics,1992,57(11):1396-1408.
[31] WOOD A W.A textbook of sound[M].New York:The MacMillan Co.,1955.
[32] VOIGT W.Lehrbuch der Kristallphysik[M].Leipzig:Tuebner,1910.
[33] BRIE A,PAMPURI F,MARSALA A F,et al.Shear sonic interpretation in gas-bearing sands[R].SPE 30595,1995.
[34] 刘雅杰,李生杰,王永刚,等.横波预测技术在苏里格气田储层预测中的应用[J].石油地球物理勘探,2016,51(1):165-172.
LIU Yajie,LI Shengjie,WANG Yonggang,et al.Reservoir prediction based on shear wave in Sulige Gas Field[J].Oil Geophysical Prospecting,2016,51(1):165-172.
[35] 王大兴.致密砂岩气储层的岩石物理模型研究[J].地球物理学报,2016,59(12):4603-4622.
WANG Daxing.Study on the rock physics model of gas reservoirs in tight sandstone[J].Chinese Journal of Geophysics,2016,59(12):4603-4622.
[36] 姜仁,曾庆才,黄家强,等.基于岩石物理分析的致密砂岩流体检测方法研究[J].科学技术与工程,2015,15(1):163-167.
JIANG Ren,ZENG Qingcai,HUANG Jiaqiang,et al.Tight gas saturation detection by most sensitive AVO attributes with rock physics analysis[J].Science Technology and Engineering,2015,15(1):163-167.
[37] REUSS A.Calculation of the flow limits of mixed crystals on the basis of the plasticity of monocrystals[J].Zeitschrift für Angewandte Mathematik und Physik,1929,9:49-58.
[38] AVSETH P,MUKERJI T,MAVKO G.Quantitative seismic interpretation:applying rock physics tools to reduce interpretation risk[M].London:Cambridge University Press,2010.
[39] KNOTT C G.Reflection and refraction of elastic waves,with seismological applications[J].Philosophical Magazine,1899,48:64-97.
[40] ZOEPPRITZ K.ERDBEBENWELLEN VⅢ B.Uber Reflexion and Durchgang seismischer Wellen durch Unstetigkeitsflaechen[J].Gottinger Nachr,1919,1:66-84.
[41] AKI K,RICHARDS P G.Quantitative seismology:theory and methods[M].San Francisco:W.H.Freeman and Company,1980.
[42] FATTI J L,SMITH G C,VAIL P J,et al.Detection of gas in sandstone reservoirs using AVO analysis:A 3-D seismic case history using the Geostack technique[J].Geophysics,1994,59(9):1362-1376.
[43] CASTAGNA J P,BATZLE M L,EASTWOOD R L.Relationships between compressional-wave and shear-wave velocities in clastic silicate rocks[J].Geophysics,1985,50(4):571-581.
[44] GARDNER G H F,GARDNER L W,GREGORY A R.Formation velocity and density-the diagnostic basics for stratigraphic traps[J].Geophysics,1974,39(6):770-780.
[45] BULAND A,OMRE H.Bayesian linearized AVO inversion[J].Geophysics,2003,68(1):185-198.
[46] 洪忠,张猛刚,朱筱敏.基于岩石物理的致密碎屑岩气藏岩性及流体概率预测[J].石油物探,2015,54(6):735-744.
HONG Zhong,ZHANG Menggang,ZHU Xiaomin.Prediction on lithology and fluid probabilities of tight clastic gas reservoir based on rock physics[J].Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum,2015,54(6):735-744.
[47] 刘成明,王德利.基于贝叶斯理论的Shearlet域一次波与多次波分离[J].石油学报,2016,37(4):483-489.
LIU Chengming,WANG Deli.Primary and multiple separation in Shearlet domain based on Bayesian theory[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2016,37(4):483-489.
[48] LI Jingye.Gas reservoir identification by seismic AVO attributes on fluid substitution[J].Applied Geophysics, 2012,9(2):139-148.
[49] RUSSELL B H,GRAY D,HAMPSON D P.Linearized AVO and poroelasticity[J].Geophysics,2011,76(3):C19-C29.
[50] 张万龙,孙赞东,贺薪蔚,等.地震岩石物理模板应用中的两个关键问题[J].地球物理学进展,2015,30(5):2324-2329.
ZHANG Wanlong,SUN Zandong,HE Xinwei,et al.Two key points of rock-physics template and its application[J].Progress in Geophysics,2015,30(5):2324-2329.

基于岩石物理的致密砂岩油藏叠前优势储层预测——以渤海湾盆地南堡凹陷4号构造东营组二段为例

Pre-stack favorable reservoir prediction in tight sandstone reservoirs based on rock physics:a case study of the 2nd Member of Dongying Formation,Structure 4,Nanpu sag,Bohai Bay Basin

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	马中高, 朱立华, 张卫华, 刘厚裕, 王猛. 雷州半岛南部玄武岩岩石物理特征[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(6): 702-710.
[2]	何昌龙, 吕龑, 黄天俊, 李益, 郗诚, 钟光海, 吴仕虎, 杨广广, 干大勇. 基于岩石物理分析的页岩气叠前预测方法在川南威远地区的应用[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(10): 1209-1218.
[3]	刘军, 刘杰, 曹均, 文晓涛, 徐乐意, 陈人杰, 陈兆明. 基于岩石物理实验的储层与孔隙流体敏感参数特征——以珠江口盆地东部中-深层碎屑岩储层为例[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(s1): 197-205.
[4]	庞礴, 董月霞, 陈迪, 庞雄奇. 含油气盆地砂岩目的层油气富集主控因素与基本模式——以渤海湾盆地南堡凹陷新近系砂岩油气藏为例[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(5): 519-531.
[5]	李潮流, 胡法龙, 袁超, 李霞, 李长喜, 刘学锋. 利用核磁共振与常规测井联合反演确定致密储层多矿物组分[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(9): 1019-1027.
[6]	吴和源, 汪建国, 王培玺, 赵宗举, 龚发雄. 渤海湾盆地南堡凹陷中—下寒武统白云岩成因及储层形成机理[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(4): 416-426.
[7]	夏景生, 刘晓涵, 王政军, 文雯, 唐小云. 渤海湾盆地南堡凹陷西部东营组三段-沙河街组一段砂质碎屑流沉积特征及油气勘探意义[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38(4): 399-413.
[8]	石玉梅, 谢韬, 宋建勇, 杨志芳. 声学全波形反演预测饱和度[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38(11): 1284-1292.
[9]	李潮流, 胡法龙, 侯雨庭, 李霞, 刘学锋, 李长喜. 基于有限元的致密砂岩储层电阻率特性模拟[J]. 石油学报, 2016, 37(6): 787-795.
[10]	白松涛, 程道解, 万金彬, 杨林, 彭洪立, 郭笑锴, 曾静波. 砂岩岩石核磁共振T₂谱定量表征[J]. 石油学报, 2016, 37(3): 382-391,414.
[11]	石玉梅, 曹宏, 李宏兵, 宋建勇, 郭宏伟, 晏信飞, 李凌高. 多参数声学全波形反演及气藏检测[J]. 石油学报, 2016, 37(2): 214-221.
[12]	董月霞, 庞雄奇, 黄曼宁, 武鲁亚, 白静. 渤海湾盆地南堡凹陷油气成藏区带定量预测与评价[J]. 石油学报, 2015, 36(S2): 19-35.
[13]	赵万金, 唐传章, 王孟华, 王余泉, 杨德相, 赵伟森, 周从安, 常建华, 卢昊. 湖相致密复杂岩性地震识别技术[J]. 石油学报, 2015, 36(s1): 59-67.
[14]	董月霞, 赵宗举, 曹中宏, 汪建国, 龚发雄, 王培玺, 吴和源, 曹芮宁, 邹刚. 南堡凹陷奥陶系碳酸盐岩岩溶残丘圈闭勘探潜力及意义[J]. 石油学报, 2015, 36(6): 653-663.
[15]	黄欣芮, 黄建平, 李振春. 基于双重孔隙理论的各向异性致密油砂岩地震岩石物理模型[J]. 石油学报, 2015, 36(10): 1248-1259.