注空气开发中地层原油氧化反应特征

doi:10.7623/syxb201803006

石油学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (3): 314-319.DOI: 10.7623/syxb201803006

注空气开发中地层原油氧化反应特征

王正茂¹, 廖广志¹, 蒲万芬², 唐君实³, 王红庄³, 江航³

1. 中国石油天然气股份有限公司勘探与生产分公司北京 100007;
2. 西南石油大学油气藏地质及开发国家重点实验室四川成都 610500;
3. 中国石油勘探开发研究院北京 100083

收稿日期:2017-08-29 修回日期:2018-02-26 出版日期:2018-03-25 发布日期:2018-04-10
通讯作者: 王正茂,男,1973年1月生,1996年获西南石油学院学士学位,2004年获西南石油学院博士学位,现为中国石油勘探与生产分公司高级工程师,主要从事三次采油和重大开发试验研究及管理工作。Email:wangzhengmao@petrochina.com.cn
作者简介:王正茂,男,1973年1月生,1996年获西南石油学院学士学位,2004年获西南石油学院博士学位,现为中国石油勘探与生产分公司高级工程师,主要从事三次采油和重大开发试验研究及管理工作。Email:wangzhengmao@petrochina.com.cn

Oxidation reaction features of formation crude oil in air injection development

Wang Zhengmao¹, Liao Guangzhi¹, Pu Wanfen², Tang Junshi³, Wang Hongzhuang³, Jiang Hang³

1. PetroChina Exploration and Production Company, Beijing 100007, China;
2. State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Southwest Petroleum University, Sichuan Chengdu 610500, China;
3. PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Beijing 100083, China

Received:2017-08-29 Revised:2018-02-26 Online:2018-03-25 Published:2018-04-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

通过分析中国不同类型油藏注空气开发的技术优势，依据室内实验和现场试验的研究成果，阐述了轻质油和稠油不同氧化阶段的氧化反应特征。研究认为，不同氧化阶段地层原油的氧化反应特征存在明显差异：在中低温氧化阶段，氧气直接与原油接触，温度越高氧化反应越强；无论轻质油还是稠油，高温氧化阶段氧化反应的主要对象是焦碳而不是原油。进一步提出了划分轻质油和稠油氧化反应4个阶段的温度区间，轻质油比稠油中温氧化反应的起始温度低，放热量大，轻质油比稠油更容易诱发氧化反应；轻质油高温放热峰值（8.06 mW/mg）略高于中温放热峰值（6.42 mW/mg），而稠油高温放热峰值却是中温放热峰值的5倍，稠油注空气火驱开发应该以实现高温氧化为主要目标。因此，根据油藏温度和油品性质等关键指标可选择空气驱或火驱等注空气开发方式：当油藏温度小于120℃时，由于氧化放热不明显，为了避免注空气开发的爆炸风险，应以减氧空气驱有效补充地层能量的开发方式为主；当油藏温度大于120℃时，在油藏条件下原油就可发生明显的氧化反应，此时可实施不减氧空气驱，充分利用原油氧化反应放热提高采收率；对于油藏温度小于120℃的稠油油藏，可通过电加热器等人工手段实现高温点火，进行高温火驱开发。

关键词: 空气驱, 空气火驱, 轻质油, 稠油, 氧化反应, 焦碳沉积, 氧化特征

Abstract:

The technical advantages of air injection development of different oil reservoirs in China were introduced. Based on the latest research results of laboratory and field tests, the oxidation reaction features of both light and heavy crude oil at different oxidation stages were elaborated. The results show that oxidation reaction features differ noticeably at different oxidation stages. In the mid-low-temperature oxidation reaction stage, oxygen is directly contacted with crude oil, and oxidation reaction increases with the temperature rising. Either for light oil or heavy oil, the main object at the high-temperature oxidation stage is coke rather than crude oil. Different temperature ranges of four different oxidation reaction stages were divided for light oil and heavy oil. It is indicated that for the mid-temperature oxidation reaction, light oil has a lower starting temperature and larger heat release, and is more prone to oxidation reaction than heavy oil. Meanwhile, the high-temperature exothermal peak(8.06 mW/mg) of light oil is slightly larger than the mid-temperature exothermal peak(6.42 mW/mg). But for heavy oil, the high-temperature exothermal peak is five times larger than the mid-temperature exothermal peak. The in-situ combustion development for heavy oil mainly aims to achieve high-temperature oxidation. Hence, the selection of air injection development methods such as air flooding and in-situ combustion relies on reservoir temperature, oil property and other key indexes. When the reservoir temperature is lower than 120℃, the oxygen-reduced air flooding method should be mainly adopted to supplement reservoir energy and avoid the explosion risk of air injection development due to insignificant oxidization heat release. When the reservoir temperature is higher than 120℃, obvious oxidation reaction will happen to crude oil under reservoir conditions. In this situation, the air flooding without oxygen-reduced process can be selected to fully exploit the heat release from the oxidization reaction of crude oil for improving enhanced oil recovery. For the heavy oil reservoir with the temperature lower than 120℃, high-temperature ignition can be implemented using artificial methods such as electric heater for high-temperature in-situ combustion development.

Key words: air flooding, in-situ combustion, light oil, heavy oil, oxidation reaction, coke deposition, oxidation features

中图分类号:

TE357

王正茂, 廖广志, 蒲万芬, 唐君实, 王红庄, 江航. 注空气开发中地层原油氧化反应特征[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(3): 314-319.

Wang Zhengmao, Liao Guangzhi, Pu Wanfen, Tang Junshi, Wang Hongzhuang, Jiang Hang. Oxidation reaction features of formation crude oil in air injection development[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2018, 39(3): 314-319.

参考文献

[1] 王元基,何江川,廖广志,等.国内火驱技术发展历程与应用前景[J].石油学报,2012,33(5):909-914.
WANG Yuanji,HE Jiangchuan,LIAO Guangzhi,et al.Overview on the development history of combustion drive and its application prospect in China[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2012,33(5):909-914.
[2] 关文龙,马德胜,梁金中,等.火驱储层区带特征实验研究[J].石油学报,2010,31(1):100-104.
GUAN Wenlong,MA Desheng,LIANG Jinzhong,et al.Experimental research on thermodynamic characteristics of in-situ combustion zones in heavy oil reservoir[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2010,31(1):100-104.
[3] REN S R,GREAVES M,RATHBONE R R.Air injection LTO process:an IOR technique for light-oil reservoirs[J].SPE Journal,2002,7(1):90-99.
[4] 王玉婷,邓君宇,刘延民,等.轻质油藏注空气过程中原油低温氧化反应的O₂-CO₂转换率[J].科学技术与工程,2014,14(26):50-54.
WANG Yuting,DENG Junyu,LIU Yanmin,et al.Oxygen-carbon dioxide conversion ratio in air-light oil low temperature oxidation process[J].Science Technology and Engineering,2014,14(26):50-54.
[5] 张方礼,赵庆辉,闫红星,等.指纹分析技术在火驱燃烧状态识别中的应用[J].特种油气藏,2015,22(6):80-84.
ZHANG Fangli,ZHAO Qinghui,YAN Hongxing,et al.Application of signature analysis technique in identification of fire flood combustion state[J].Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs,2015,22(6):80-84.
[6] 关文龙,张霞林,席长丰,等.稠油老区直井火驱驱替特征与井网模式选择[J].石油学报,2017,38(8):935-946.
GUAN Wenlong,ZHANG Xialin,XI Changfeng,et al.Displacement characteristics and well pattern selection of vertical-well fire flooding in heavy oil reservoir[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2017,38(8):935-946.
[7] 梁金中,王伯军,关文龙,等.稠油油藏火烧油层吞吐技术与矿场试验[J].石油学报,2017,38(3):324-332.
LIANG Jinzhong,WANG Bojun,GUAN Wenlong,et al.Technology and field test of cyclic in situ combustion in heavy oil reservoir[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2017,38(3):324-332.
[8] 侯胜明,刘印华,于洪敏,等.注空气过程轻质原油低温氧化动力学[J].中国石油大学学报:自然科学版,2011,35(1):169-173.
HOU Shengming,LIU Yinhua,YU Hongmin,et al.Kinetics of low temperature oxidation of light oil in air injection process[J].Journal of China University of Petroleum:Edition of Natural Science,2011,35(1):169-173.
[9] 杜建芬,郭平,王仲林,等.轻质油藏高压注空气加速量热分析实验研究[J].西南石油大学学报:自然科学版,2007,29(2):17-21.
DU Jianfen,GUO Ping,WANG Zhonglin,et al.Laboratory research of accelerating rate calorimeter test of high-pressure air injection at light oil reservoirs[J].Journal of Southwest Petroleum University:Science & Technology Edition,2007,29(2):17-21.
[10] 唐君实,关文龙,蒋有伟,等.稀油火烧油层物理模拟[J].石油学报,2015,36(9):1135-1140.
TANG Junshi,GUAN Wenlong,JIANG Youwei,et al.Physical simulation of light oil in-situ combustion[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2015,36(9):1135-1140.
[11] 李士伦,张正卿,冉新权,等.注气提高石油采收率技术[M].成都:四川科学技术出版社,2001:11.
LI Shilun,ZHANG Zhengqing,RAN Xinquan,et al.EOR technology by gas injection[M].Chengdu:Sichuan Science and Technology Press,2001:11.
[12] 郭平,樊建民,徐艳梅,等.低渗油藏注气发展潜力与问题[J].低渗透油气田,2006(3):69-74.
GUO Ping,FAN Jianmin,XU Yanmei,et al.Development potentials and problems in gas injection to low-permeability oil reservoirs[J].Low Permeability Oil & Gas Field,2006(3):69-74.
[13] 林伟民,邓瑞健,刘勇,等.中原油田轻质油藏注空气低温氧化反应机理研究[J].油田化学,2013,30(4):534-538.
LIN Weimin,DENG Ruijian,LIU Yong,et al.The mechanism of low temperature oxidation by air injection process in Zhongyuan light oil reservoir[J].Oilfield Chemistry,2013,30(4):534-538.
[14] 东晓虎,刘慧卿,庞占喜.轻质原油注空气低温氧化反应动力学研究[J].应用化工,2012,41(7):1135-1139.
DONG Xiaohu,LIU Huiqing,PANG Zhanxi.Study on reaction kinetics of low temperature oxidation of air injection in light crude oil[J].Applied Chemical Industry, 2012,41(7):1135-1139.
[15] 刘鹏刚,蒲万芬,贾虎,等.岩屑存在下油藏注空气原油的氧化热解分析[J].燃烧科学与技术,2015,21(5):464-470.
LIU Penggang,PU Wanfen,JIA Hu,et al.Oil oxidation pyrolysis analysis of oil reservoir air injection in the presence of cutting[J].Journal of Combustion Science and Technology,2015,21(5):464-470.
[16] 蒋有伟,张义堂,刘尚奇,等.低渗透油藏注空气开发驱油机理[J].石油勘探与开发,2010,37(4):471-476.
JIANG Youwei,ZHANG Yitang,LIU Shangqi,et al.Displacement mechanisms of air injection in low permeability reservoirs[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2010,37(4):471-476.
[17] BAGCI S.Effect of clay content on combustion reaction parameters[J].Energy Sources,2005,27(6):579-588.
[18] 林伟民.地层原油及其族组分的氧化反应特性研究[J].应用化工,2011,40(9):1581-1584.
LIN Weimin.Oxidation behavior of formation crude oil and its group components[J].Applied Chemical Industry,2011,40(9):1581-1584.
[19] LI J,MEHTA S A,MOORE R G,et al.Oxidation and ignition behaviour of saturated hydrocarbon samples with crude oils using TG/DTG and DTA thermal analysis techniques[J].Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology,2004,43(7):45-51.
[20] 油气田开发专业标准化委员会.稠油油藏流体物性分析方法原油粘度测定:SY/T 6316-1997[S].北京:石油工业出版社,1997.
Standard Technical Committee of Oil and Gas Field Development.Analytical approach of fluid physical property for heavy-oil reservoirs crude oil viscosity measurements:SY/T 6316-1997[S].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,1997.
[21] 陈振亚,牛保伦,汤灵芝,等.原油组分低温氧化机理和反应活性实验研究[J].燃料化学学报,2013,41(11):1336-1342.
CHEN Zhenya,NIU Baolun,TANG Lingzhi,et al.Experimental study of low temperature oxidation mechanism and activity of oil components[J].Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology,2013,41(11):1336-1342.
[22] 桂玢,王艳芳,张鑫,等.原油空气氧化前后多环芳烃组分的气相色谱-质谱分析[J].化学研究,2010,21(3):75-79.
GUI Bin,WANG Yanfang,ZHANG Xin,et al.Analysis of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in crude oil before and after air injection by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry[J].Chemical Research,2010,21(3):75-79.
[23] 江航,许强辉,马德胜,等.注空气开采过程中稠油结焦量影响因素[J].石油学报,2016,37(8):1030-1036.
JIANG Hang,XU Qianghui,MA Desheng,et al.Influence factors of coking amount during recovery of heavy oil by air injection[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2016,37(8):1030-1036.

注空气开发中地层原油氧化反应特征

Oxidation reaction features of formation crude oil in air injection development

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	李晓光. 辽河坳陷欢喜岭油田稠油成藏条件及勘探开发关键技术[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(4): 541-560.
[2]	崔传智, 郑文乾, 祝仰文, 元福卿, 吴忠维, 隋迎飞. 蒸汽吞吐后转降黏化学驱加密井井位优化方法[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(12): 1643-1648,1656.
[3]	燕歌, 王广源, 许杰, 王飞龙, 高科超, 卢欢, 陈容涛. 渤海海域蓬莱19-3油田原油生物降解气地球化学特征与成因[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(S2): 46-56.
[4]	关文龙, 张霞林, 席长丰, 王晓春, 杨凤祥, 施小荣, 李秋. 稠油老区直井火驱驱替特征与井网模式选择[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38(8): 935-946,972.
[5]	徐长贵, 王冰洁, 王飞龙, 宛良伟, 张如才. 辽东湾坳陷新近系特稠油成藏模式与成藏过程——以旅大5-2北油田为例[J]. 石油学报, 2016, 37(5): 599-609.
[6]	林日亿, 罗建军, 王新伟, 谢逢佳, 宋多培, 盖争, 田鑫. 非含硫金属盐对稠油水热裂解生成硫化氢影响实验[J]. 石油学报, 2016, 37(2): 237-241.
[7]	李萍, 刘志龙, 邹剑, 刘海英, 于继飞, 范永涛. 渤海旅大27-2油田蒸汽吞吐先导试验注采工程[J]. 石油学报, 2016, 37(2): 242-247.
[8]	陶小晚, 张义杰, 段书府, 张丽娟, 郑多明, 田瀚, 张欣欣, 朱文平. 塔里木盆地哈拉哈塘油田原油聚集过程与密度多变成因[J]. 石油学报, 2015, 36(4): 405-415.
[9]	吴川, 张汝生, 张祖国, 孙志宇, 吴正彬. 超稠油改质降黏分子模拟及机理[J]. 石油学报, 2015, 36(3): 355-360.
[10]	刘忠能, 钟海全, 李颖川, 刘彦哲, 毛建文, 王鹏. 稠油环空掺稀气举技术——以吐哈油田吐玉克区块为例[J]. 石油学报, 2015, 36(2): 217-223.
[11]	何聪鸽, 穆龙新, 许安著, 方思冬. 稠油油藏蒸汽吞吐加热半径及产能预测新模型[J]. 石油学报, 2015, 36(12): 1564-1570.
[12]	张运军, 沈德煌, 高永荣, 李军辉, 李杰, 刘岩. 二氧化碳气体辅助SAGD物理模拟实验[J]. 石油学报, 2014, 35(6): 1147-1152.
[13]	张兆祥, 刘慧卿, 杨阳, 舒怀, 朱林. 稠油油藏蒸汽驱评价新方法[J]. 石油学报, 2014, 35(4): 733-738.
[14]	曹嫣镔, 刘冬青, 王善堂, 于田田, 张仲平. 中深层稠油油藏化学辅助蒸汽驱三维物理模拟与应用[J]. 石油学报, 2014, 35(4): 739-744.
[15]	鹿腾, 李兆敏, 李松岩, 刘尚奇, 李星民, 王鹏, 王壮壮. 稠油溶解气驱渗流特征物理模拟和数值模拟[J]. 石油学报, 2014, 35(2): 332-339.