断层对盖层的动态破坏及其对油气输导的影响——以渤海湾盆地歧口凹陷港东断裂为例

doi:10.7623/syxb201908006

石油学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (8): 956-964.DOI: 10.7623/syxb201908006

断层对盖层的动态破坏及其对油气输导的影响——以渤海湾盆地歧口凹陷港东断裂为例

史集建¹, 李丽丽², 杜琳³, 宋宇官¹

1. 东北石油大学地球科学学院黑龙江大庆 163318;
2. 大庆油田有限责任公司勘探开发研究院黑龙江大庆 163712;
3. 中国石油化工股份有限公司上海海洋油气分公司上海 200120

收稿日期:2018-06-12 修回日期:2018-12-11 出版日期:2019-08-25 发布日期:2019-08-28
通讯作者: 史集建,男,1982年10月生,2006年获大庆石油学院资源勘查工程专业学士学位,2012年获东北石油大学矿产普查与勘探专业博士学位,现为东北石油大学地球科学学院副教授,主要从事油气藏形成及保存条件研究。Email:shijijian@163.com
作者简介:史集建,男,1982年10月生,2006年获大庆石油学院资源勘查工程专业学士学位,2012年获东北石油大学矿产普查与勘探专业博士学位,现为东北石油大学地球科学学院副教授,主要从事油气藏形成及保存条件研究。Email:shijijian@163.com
基金资助:
国家科技重大专项（2016ZX05007-003-003）、国家自然科学基金项目（No.41702153）和中国博士后科学基金项目（2016M591508）资助。

Dynamic damage of fault to caprock and its influence on hydrocarbon transport: a case study of Gangdong fault in Qikou sag, Bohai Bay Basin

Shi Jijian¹, Li Lili², Du Lin³, Song Yuguan¹

1. School of Earth Sciences, Northeast Petroleum University, Heilongjiang Daqing 163318, China;
2. Exploration and Development Research Institute, Daqing Oilfield Limited Company, Heilongjiang Daqing 163712, China;
3. Sinopec Shanghai Off shore Petroleum Company, Shanghai 200120, China

Received:2018-06-12 Revised:2018-12-11 Online:2019-08-25 Published:2019-08-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

断层对泥岩盖层破坏程度的静态评价在分析油气垂向输导时具有一定的局限性，采用动态评价方法可预测油气沿断层突破盖层的时间及油气成藏区域。以地层去压实校正法和断层最大断距相减法恢复的地层古厚度和断层古断距为依据，可得到沿断层各测点处不同地质时期的"盖层连接厚度"这一定量评价参数，然后结合研究区内烃源岩的生、排烃历史，可预测油气沿断层突破盖层的时间及油气成藏区域。以渤海湾盆地歧口凹陷港东断层对盖层的动态破坏为例，根据港东断层对沙河街组一段中部泥岩盖层的破坏程度，可将断层的动态破坏分为3个主要阶段：沙河街组一段沉积期，泥岩盖层遭受完全破坏的区域比较局限；东营组-馆陶组沉积期，尽管泥岩盖层被破坏的规模有所增大，但断层的活动性与烃源岩的排烃史的耦合性不佳；明化镇组沉积期至今，泥岩盖层完全破坏的区域向西侧略有延伸，且烃源岩的生、排烃能力和断层活动性均较强，深层油气可以通过港东断层突破沙河街组一段中部盖层进入浅部地层。在港东油田明化镇组中，已发现港东油田内油气的分布范围与港东断层在明化镇组沉积期对沙河街组一段中部盖层造成完全破坏的区域范围相吻合，表明渤海湾盆地港东断层的动态破坏对油气的输导和成藏具有重要的控制作用。

关键词: 泥岩盖层, 输导断层, 泥岩涂抹, 油气输导, 港东断层

Abstract:

The static evaluation of fault damage affected on the mudstone caprock has certain limitations in analyzing vertical hydrocarbon transport; dynamic evaluation method can be used to predict the time for oil and gas to break through caprock along the fault and the hydrocarbon accumulation area. According to the paleostratigraphic thickness and the ancient fault throw recovered by the decompaction correction and maximum throw subtracting method, the quantitative evaluation parameter of "caprock connecting thickness" at different geological periods and measuring points along the fault can be obtained. Then combined with the hydrocarbon generation and expulsion history of source rocks in the study area, it is able to predict the time for oil and gas to break through caprock along the fault and the hydrocarbon accumulation area. Taking the dynamic damage of Gangdong fault to the caprock in Qikou sag, Bohai Bay Basin as an example, according to the damage caused by Gangdong fault to the middle mudstone caprock in Member 1 of Shahejie Formation, the dynamic damage of fault can be divided into three main stages:in the depositional stage of Member 1 of Shahejie Formation, the damage of the mudstone caprock was relatively limited; in the depositional stage from Dongying Formation to Guantao Formation, the damage scale of the mudstone caprock increased, but the coupling between fault activity and hydrocarbon expulsion history of source rock was not ideal; From the depositional stage of Minghuazhen Formation to the present, the area with completely damaged mudstone caprock extended slightly to the west, both the hydrocarbon generation and expulsion of source rock and the fault activity presented quite strong so that the deep oil and gas could break through the middle caprock in Member 1 of Shahejie Formation through Gangdong fault to enter the shallow strata. In the Minghuazhen Formation of Gangdong oilfield, it has been found that the oil and gas distribution area in Gangdong oilfield is consistent with the area where the Gangdong fault completely damaged the middle caprock of Member 1 of Shahejie Formation during the depositional stage of Minghuazhen Formation, which indicates that the dynamic damage of the Gangdong fault plays an important role in controlling the hydrocarbon transport and accumulation in Bohai Bay Basin.

Key words: mudstone caprock, transporting fault, shale smear, hydrocarbon migration, Gandong fault

中图分类号:

TE122.3

史集建, 李丽丽, 杜琳, 宋宇官. 断层对盖层的动态破坏及其对油气输导的影响——以渤海湾盆地歧口凹陷港东断裂为例[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(8): 956-964.

Shi Jijian, Li Lili, Du Lin, Song Yuguan. Dynamic damage of fault to caprock and its influence on hydrocarbon transport: a case study of Gangdong fault in Qikou sag, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2019, 40(8): 956-964.

参考文献

[1] 孙永河,漆家福,吕延防,等. 渤中坳陷断裂构造特征及其对油气的控制[J].石油学报,2008,29(5):669-675.
SUN Yonghe,QI Jiafu,LÜ Yanfang,et al.Characteristics of fault structure and its control to hydrocarbon in Bozhong depression[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2008,29(5):669-675.
[2] 蒋有录,刘培,宋国奇,等.渤海湾盆地新生代晚期断层活动与新近系油气富集关系[J].石油与天然气地质,2015,36(4):525-533.
JIANG Youlu,LIU Pei,SONG Guoqi,et al.Late Cenozoic faulting activities and their influence upon hydrocarbon accumulations in the Neogene in Bohai Bay Basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2015,36(4):525-533.
[3] 刘哲,付广,吕延防,等.南堡凹陷断裂对油气成藏控制作用的定量评价[J].中国石油大学学报:自然科学版,2013,37(1):27-34.
LIU Zhe,FU Guang,LU Yanfang,et al.Quantitative evaluation for control of faults on hydrocarbon accumulation in Nanpu sag[J].Journal of China University of Petroleum:Edition of Natural Science,2013,37(1):27-34.
[4] 邓运华,薛永安,于水,等.浅层油气运聚理论与渤海大油田群的发现[J].石油学报,2017,38(1):1-8.
DENG Yunhua,XUE Yong'an,YU Shui,et al.Shallow hydrocarbon migration and accumulation theory and discovery of giant oilfield group in Bohai Sea[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2017,38(1):1-8.
[5] 薛永安.渤海海域油气运移"汇聚脊"模式及其对新近系油气成藏的控制[J].石油学报,2018,39(9):963-970.
XUE Yong'an.The "catchment ridge" model of hydrocarbon migration in Bohai Sea and its control on Neogene hydrocarbon accumulation[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2018,39(9):963-970.
[6] 赵贤正,蒋有录,金凤鸣,等.富油凹陷洼槽区油气成藏机理与成藏模式——以冀中坳陷饶阳凹陷为例[J].石油学报,2017,38(1):67-76.
ZHAO Xianzheng,JIANU Youlu,JIN Fengming,et al.Hydrocarbon accumulation mechanism and model of sub-sags in hydrocarbonrich sag:a case study of Raoyang sag in Jizhong depression[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2017,38(1):67-76.
[7] 胡慧婷,王龙,刘岩,等.超压泥岩盖层中断层垂向封闭能力研究方法及其应用[J].石油与天然气地质,2014,35(3):359-364.
HU Huiting,WANG Long,LIU Yan,et al.Research method of fault vertical sealing capacity in overpressure mudstone caprock and its application[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2014,35(3):359-364.
[8] 史集建,李丽丽,付广,等.盖层内断层垂向封闭性定量评价方法及应用[J].吉林大学学报:地球科学版,2012,42(S2):162-170.
SHI Jijian,LI Lili,FU Guang,et al.Quantitative evaluation method and application of vertical sealing property of faults in caprock[J].Journal of Jilin University:Earth Science Edition,2012,42(S2):162-170.
[9] 付晓飞,陈哲,闫百泉,等.海拉尔-塔木察格盆地中部断陷带油气富集主控因素分析——断层和盖层双控模式[J].中国科学:地球科学,2013,43(8):1338-1351.
FU Xiaofei,CHEN Zhe,YAN Baiquan,et al.Analysis of main controlling factors for hydrocarbon accumulation in central rift zones of the Hailar-Tamtsag Basin using a fault-caprock dual control mode[J].Science China Earth Sciences,2013,56(8):1357-1370.
[10] 付广,杨敬博.断盖配置对沿断裂运移油气的封闭作用:以南堡凹陷中浅层为例[J].地球科学:中国地质大学学报,2013,38(4):783-791.
FU Guang,YANG Jingbo.Sealing of matching between fault and caprock to oil-gas migration along faults:an example from middle and shallow strata in Nanpu depression[J].Earth Science:Journal of China University of Geoscience,2013,38(4):783-791.
[11] 贾茹,付晓飞,孟令东,等.断裂及其伴生微构造对不同类型储层的改造机理[J].石油学报,2017,38(3):286-296.
JIA Ru,FU Xiaofei,MENG Lingdong,et al.Transformation mechanism of fault and its associated microstructures for different kinds of reservoirs[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2017,38(3):286-296.
[12] 吕延防,许辰璐,付广,等.南堡凹陷中浅层盖-断组合控油模式及有利含油层位预测[J].石油与天然气地质,2014,35(1):86-97.
LÜ Yanfang,XU Chenlu,FU Guang,et al.Oil-controlling models of caprock-fault combination and prediction of favorable horizons for hydrocarbon accumulation in middle-shallow sequences of Nanpu sag[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2014,35(1):86-97.
[13] 吴桐,付晓飞,王海学,等.膏盐岩脆塑性变形特征及封闭能力定量评价[J].地质论评,2016,62(1):127-136.
WU Tong,FU Xiaofei,WANG Haixue,et al.Brittle ductile deformation characteristics of anhydrite-salt rock and quantitative evaluation of its sealing ability[J]. Geological Review,2016,62(1):127-136.
[14] Gor G Y,Elliot T R,Prévost J H.Effects of thermal stresses on caprock integrity during CO₂ storage[J].International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control,2013,12:300-309.
[15] BOUVIER J D,KAARS-SIJPESTEIJN C H,KLUESNER D F,et al.Three-dimensional seismic interpretation and fault sealing investigations,Nun river field,Nigeria[J].AAPG Bulletin,1989,73(11):1397-1414.
[16] KNIPE R J.Faulting processes and fault seal[C]//LARSFN R M.Structural and Tectonic Modelling and its Application to Petroleum Geology.Stavanger:Norwegian Petroleum Society,1992:325-342.
[17] LINDSAY N G,MURPHY F C,WALSH J J,et al.Outcrop studies of shale smears on fault surfaces[M]//FLINT S S,BRYANT I D.The geological modelling of hydrocarbon reservoirs and outcrop analogues.Special Publication of International Association of Sedimentologists,1993,15:113-123.
[18] LEHNER F K,PILAAR W F.The emplacement of clay smears in synsedimentary normal faults:inferences from field observations near Frechen,Germany[J].Norwegian Petroleum Society Special Publication,1997,7:15-38.
[19] JEV B I,KAARS-SIJPESTEIJN C H,PETERS M P A M,et al.Akaso field,Nigeria:use of integrated 3-D seismic,fault slicing,clay smearing,and RFT pressure data on fault trapping and dynamic leakage[J].AAPG Bulletin,1993,77(8):1389-1404.
[20] YIELDING G.Shale gouge ratio:Calibration by geohistory[C]//KOESLTER A G,HUNSDALE R.Hydrocarbon Seal Quantification.Amsterdam:Norwegian Petroleum Society Special Publication,2002:1-15.
[21] 付晓飞,郭雪,朱丽旭,等.泥岩涂抹形成演化与油气运移及封闭[J].中国矿业大学学报,2012,41(1):52-63.
FU Xiaofei,GUO Xue,ZHU Lixu,et al.Formation and evolution of clay smear and hydrocarbon migration and sealing[J].Journal of China University of Mining & Technology,2012,41(1):52-63.
[22] CHILDS C,WALSH J J,WATTERSON J.Complexity in fault zone structure and implications for fault seal prediction[J].Norwegian Petroleum Society Special Publications,1997,7:61-72.
[23] PERRIER R,QUIBLIER J.Thickness changes in sedimentary layers during compaction history; methods for quantitative evaluation[J].AAPG Bulletin,1974,58(3):507-520.
[24] 谭开俊,卫平生,吕锡敏,等.地层古厚度定量恢复方法研究及应用——以准噶尔盆地陆东地区为例[J].天然气工业,2005,25(10):24-26.
TAN Kaijun,WEI Pingsheng,LÜ Ximing,et al.Research on quantitative resumption method of stratum paleothickness and its application——taking Ludong area in Zhunge'er Basin as an example[J].Natural Gas Industry,2005,25(10):24-26.
[25] 李兰斌,孙家振,陈钟惠,等.盐湖盆地的古厚度恢复[J].石油实验地质,2000,22(1):59-63.
LI Lanbin,SUN Jiazhen,CHEN Zhonghui,et al.Back stripping inversion of original stratum thickness in a salt basin[J].Experimental Petroleum Geology,2000,22(1):59-63.
[26] 陈恭洋.地层压实恢复的定量计算[J].江汉石油学院学报,1996,18(1):1-6.
CHEN Gongyang.Quantitative analysis of back-stripping of formation compaction[J].Journal of Jianghan Petroleum Institute,1996,18(1):1-6.
[27] ATHY L F.Density,porosity,and compaction of sedimentary rocks[J].AAPG Bulletin,1930,14(1):1-24.
[28] DUTTON D M,TRUDGILL B D.Four-dimensional analysis of the Sembo relay system,offshore Angola:implications for fault growth in salt-detached settings[J].AAPG Bulletin,2009,93(6):763-794.
[29] XU Shunshan,NIETO-SAMANIEGO A F,LI Dongxu.Relationship between fault length and maximum displacement and influenced factors[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2004,11(4):567-573.
[30] 肖丽华,孟元林,牛嘉玉,等.歧口凹陷沙河街组成岩史分析和成岩阶段预测[J].地质科学,2005,40(3):346-362.
XIAO Lihua,MENG Yuanlin,NIU Jiayu,et al.Diagenetic history and diagenetic stages' prediction of Shahejie Formation in the Qikou sag[J].Chinese Journal of Geology,2005,40(3):346-362.
[31] 张长江,潘文蕾,刘光祥,等.中国南方志留系泥质岩盖层动态评价研究[J].天然气地球科学,2008,19(3):301-310.
ZHANG Changjiang,PAN Wenlei,LIU Guangxiang,et al.Dynamic evaluation to the cap formation of silurian argillaceous rock,southern China[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2008,19(3):301-310.
[32] 王振升,滑双君,于学敏,等.歧口凹陷沙河街组烃源岩分级评价及优质烃源岩分布[J].天然气地球科学,2014,25(12):1896-1902.
WANG Zhensheng,HUA Shuangjun,YU Xuemin,et al.Grading evaluation and high quality source rock distribution in Qikou sag[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2014,25(12):1896-1902.
[33] 史集建,付广,吕延防,等.歧口凹陷沙河街组一段中部区域盖层封气能力综合评价[J].石油与天然气地质,2011,32(5):659-681.
SHI Jijian,FU Guang,LÜ Yanfang,et al.Comprehensive evaluation of regional seal in the middle of the first member of Shahejie Fm in the Qikou sag[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2011,32(5):659-681.
[34] 贾春明.黄骅坳陷新近系断裂活动特征及其与油气成藏的关系[D].北京:中国石油大学(北京),2005.
JIA Chunming.The activity characteristics of Upper Tertiary faults system and its relation with petroleum accumulation in Huanghua depression[D].Beijing:China University of Petroleum (Beijing),2005.
[35] 史集建.歧口凹陷盖层及其后期破坏对油气分布的控制作用研究[D].大庆:东北石油大学,2012.
SHI Jijian.Control function of caprock and its post-destruction on oil and gas distribution in Qinkou sag[D].Daqing:Northeast Petroleum University,2012.

断层对盖层的动态破坏及其对油气输导的影响——以渤海湾盆地歧口凹陷港东断裂为例

Dynamic damage of fault to caprock and its influence on hydrocarbon transport: a case study of Gangdong fault in Qikou sag, Bohai Bay Basin

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 10

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	鲁雪松, 柳少波, 田华, 马行陟, 于志超, 范俊佳, 桂丽黎, 刘强. 深层背斜圈闭中泥岩盖层完整性评价方法及其应用——以四川盆地川中地区震旦系气藏为例[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(4): 415-427.
[2]	周冰, 刘立, 金之钧, 刘全有, 孟庆强, 朱东亚. 泥岩盖层的溶蚀作用机理实验——不同pH值盐水中溶蚀速率变化规律[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38(8): 916-924.
[3]	姜福杰, 杨海军, 沈卫兵, 王涵, 王友伟. 塔中地区奥陶系碳酸盐岩油气输导格架及其控藏模式[J]. 石油学报, 2015, 36(S2): 51-59.
[4]	彭俊文, 庞雄奇, 李洪博, 肖爽, 王卓超, 庞洵. 基于油气输导门限与组合控藏作用定量预测有利勘探区带的新方法——以珠一坳陷珠江组下段为例[J]. 石油学报, 2015, 36(S2): 156-168.
[5]	张斌崔洁顾乔元朱光有苏劲. 塔北隆起西部复式油气区原油成因与成藏意义[J]. 石油学报, 2010, 31(1): 55-60.
[6]	陈瑞银, 罗晓容, 吴亚生. 利用成岩序列建立油气输导格架[J]. 石油学报, 2007, 28(6): 43-46,51.
[7]	赵密福, 李阳, 李东旭. 泥岩涂抹定量研究[J]. 石油学报, 2005, 26(1): 60-64.
[8]	翟光明, 何文渊. 塔里木盆地石油勘探实现突破的重要方向[J]. 石油学报, 2004, 25(1): 1-7.
[9]	付广, 吕延防, 薛永超, 杨勉. 泥岩盖层压力封闭的演化特征及其研究意义[J]. 石油学报, 2000, 21(3): 41-44.
[10]	戴贤忠, 李学田. 济阳坳陷第三系天然气藏盖层评价及其形成机理[J]. 石油学报, 1991, 12(2): 1-9.