海相与陆相页岩储层孔隙结构差异的影响因素

doi:10.7623/syxb202012005

石油学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (12): 1501-1512.DOI: 10.7623/syxb202012005

海相与陆相页岩储层孔隙结构差异的影响因素

宋岩¹, 高凤琳^1,2, 唐相路¹, 陈磊¹, 王幸蒙¹

1. 中国石油大学(北京)非常规油气科学技术研究院北京 102249;
2. 中国地质调查局发展研究中心北京 100037

收稿日期:2020-01-07 修回日期:2020-09-28 出版日期:2020-12-25 发布日期:2021-01-06
通讯作者: 高凤琳,女,1988年3月生,2010年获西安石油大学地质学专业学士学位,2019年获中国石油大学(北京)博士学位,现为中国地质调查局发展研究中心博士后,从事非常规天然气成藏和油气地质资料综合服务利用研究工作。Email:471568216@qq.com
作者简介:宋岩,女,1957年10月生,1982年获华东石油学院石油地质专业学士学位,2003年获中国科学院博士学位,现为中国石油大学(北京)非常规油气科学技术研究院教授,长期从事天然气地质综合研究工作。Email:sya@petrochina.com.cn
基金资助:
国家科技重大专项（2016ZX05034-001-005）资助。

Influencing factors of pore structure differences between marine and terrestrial shale reservoirs

Song Yan¹, Gao Fenglin^1,2, Tang Xianglu¹, Chen Lei¹, Wang Xingmeng¹

1. Institute of Unconventional Oil&Gas Science and Technology, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China;
2. Development and Research Center, China Geological Survey, Beijing 100037, China

Received:2020-01-07 Revised:2020-09-28 Online:2020-12-25 Published:2021-01-06

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

海相页岩和陆相页岩的孔隙结构差异明显。基于海相和陆相页岩在岩石组分、成熟度以及有机显微组分的差异开展的成因机理分析表明，页岩中不同岩石组分孔隙的孔径分布差异大，有机质孔隙在小孔径范围内占比多，黏土矿物孔隙与有机质孔隙的孔径分布特征相似，但亦发育中孔和宏孔。海相页岩的小孔径孔隙多由有机质提供，而陆相页岩的小孔径孔隙多来自黏土矿物。无论是海相页岩还是陆相页岩，其孔隙均以无机矿物孔隙为主，其次为有机质孔隙，所不同的是海相页岩中有机质孔隙的贡献率高于陆相页岩，而陆相页岩中黏土矿物孔隙的贡献率高于海相页岩。有机质孔隙在不同演化阶段的孔隙构成不同，未成熟阶段以发育镜质体和惰质体的原始胞腔孔隙为主，成熟阶段有机质孔隙的发育程度最差，高成熟—过成熟阶段以发育次生固体沥青孔隙为主。高成熟—过成熟海相页岩的有机质以腐泥组和固体沥青为主，其有机质孔隙发育程度高。在以松辽盆地沙河子组为代表的高成熟陆相页岩中，其有机质以镜质体和惰质体为主，原始胞腔孔隙损失大，含有少量固体沥青孔隙；在以鄂尔多斯盆地延长组为代表的低成熟陆相页岩中，由于腐泥组和固体沥青充填孔隙，使得页岩整体的孔隙发育程度变差。

关键词: 海相页岩, 陆相页岩, 孔隙结构差异, 岩石组分, 成熟度, 有机显微组分

Abstract:

Marine shale and terrestrial shale are obviously different in pore structure. The analysis of genetic mechanism based on differences in the rock composition, maturity and organic maceral of marine and terrestrial shale shows that different components in shale have great difference in pore size distribution, and the organic pores account for a high proportion in the range of small pore size. The pore size distribution characteristics of clay mineral are similar with organic pores, while mesopores and macropores are also developed in clay mineral. The small pores of marine and terrestrial shale are mostly provided by organic matter and clay minerals, respectively. Either marine or terrestrial shale mainly has inorganic mineral pores, followed by organic pores. The difference is that the contribution of organic pores in marine shale is higher than that in terrestrial shale, while the contribution of pores in clay minerals of the terrestrial shale is higher as compared with marine shale. The organic pore composition varies at different stages of evolution. In the immature stage, the original cellular pores of vitrinite and inertinite were dominantly developed. In the mature stage, the development of organic pores is the lowest. In the high-mature and over-mature stage, the pores of secondary solid bitumen were predominantly developed. The organic matter of high-mature and over-mature marine shale is dominated by sapropel and solid bitumen, showing the high development of organic pores. The high-mature terrestrial shale represented by Shahezi Formation in Songliao Basin mainly has the organic matter dominated by vitrinite and inertinite, suffering a large loss of original cellular pores, containing a few pores in solid bitumen. In the low-mature terrestrial shale represented by Yanchang Formation in Ordos Basin, the whole development of pores is low due to the filling of pores with sapropel and solid bitumen.

Key words: marine shale, terrestrial shale, pore structure difference, rock composition, maturity, organic maceral

中图分类号:

TE122.2

宋岩, 高凤琳, 唐相路, 陈磊, 王幸蒙. 海相与陆相页岩储层孔隙结构差异的影响因素[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(12): 1501-1512.

Song Yan, Gao Fenglin, Tang Xianglu, Chen Lei, Wang Xingmeng. Influencing factors of pore structure differences between marine and terrestrial shale reservoirs[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(12): 1501-1512.

参考文献

[1] 董大忠,王玉满,李新景,等.中国页岩气勘探开发新突破及发展前景思考[J].天然气工业,2016,36(1):19-32.
DONG Dazhong,WANG Yuman,LI Xinjing,et al.Breakthrough and prospect of shale gas exploration and development in China[J].Natural Gas Industry,2016,36(1):19-32.
[2] 邹才能,董大忠,王玉满,等.中国页岩气特征、挑战及前景(一)[J].石油勘探与开发,2015,42(6):689-701.
ZOU Caineng,DONG Dazhong,WANG Yuman,et al.Shale gas in China:characteristics,challenges and prospects (Ⅰ)[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2015,42(6):689-701.
[3] 邹才能,董大忠,王玉满,等.中国页岩气特征、挑战及前景(二)[J].石油勘探与开发,2016,43(2):166-178.
ZOU Caineng,DONG Dazhong,WANG Yuman,et al.Shale gas in China:characteristics,challenges and prospects (Ⅱ)[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2016,43(2):166-178.
[4] LOUCKS R G,REED R M,RUPPEL S C,et al.Morphology,genesis,and distribution of nanometer-scale pores in siliceous mudstones of the Mississippian Barnett shale[J].Journal of Sedimentary Research,2009,79(12):848-861.
[5] LOUCKS R G,REED R M,RUPPEL S C,et al.Spectrum of pore types and networks in mudrocks and a descriptive classification for matrix-related mudrock pores[J].AAPG Bulletin,2012,96(6):1071-1098.
[6] 邹才能,朱如凯,白斌,等.中国油气储层中纳米孔首次发现及其科学价值[J].岩石学报,2011,27(6):1857-1864.
ZOU Caineng,ZHU Rukai,BAI Bin,et al.First discovery of nano-pore throat in oil and gas reservoir in China and its scientific value[J].Acta Petrologica Sinica,2011,27(6):1857-1864.
[7] JAVADPOUR F,FISHER D,UNSWORTH M.Nanoscale gas flow in shale gas sediments[J].Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 2007,46(10):55-61.
[8] CHALMERS G R,BUSTIN R M,POWER I M.Characterization of gas shale pore systems by porosimetry,pycnometry,surface area,and field emission scanning electron microscopy/transmission electron microscopy image analyses:examples from the Barnett,Woodford,Haynesville,Marcellus,and Doig units[J].AAPG Bulletin,2012,96(6):1099-1119.
[9] 贾承造,郑民,张永峰.非常规油气地质学重要理论问题[J].石油学报,2014,35(1):1-10.
JIA Chengzao,ZHENG Ming,ZHANG Yongfeng.Four important theoretical issues of unconventional petroleum geology[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2014,35(1):1-10.
[10] 姜振学,唐相路,李卓,等.川东南地区龙马溪组页岩孔隙结构全孔径表征及其对含气性的控制[J].地学前缘,2016,23(2):126-134.
JIANG Zhenxue,TANG Xianglu,LI Zhuo,et al.The whole-aperture pore structure characteristics and its effect on gas content of the Longmaxi Formation shale in the southeastern Sichuan Basin[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2016,23(2):126-134.
[11] 姜振学,李卓,唐相路,等.页岩全孔径孔隙体积的表征方法:201510785013.9[P].2016-03-30.
JIANG Zhenxue,LI Zhuo,TANG Xianglu,et al.Characterizing method for pore volumes of full apertures of shale:201510785013.9[P].2016-03-30.
[12] 石油勘探开发科学研究院.烃源岩的地球化学及演化特征[R].北京:石油勘探开发科学研究院,1989.
Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development.Geochemistry and evolution characteristics of source rocks[R].Beijing:Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development,1989.
[13] 高凤琳,宋岩,梁志凯,等.陆相页岩有机质孔隙发育特征及成因——以松辽盆地长岭断陷沙河子组页岩为例[J].石油学报,2019,40(9):1030-1044.
GAO Fenglin,SONG Yan,LIANG Zhikai,et al.Development characteristics of organic pore in the continental shale and its genetic mechanism:a case study of Shahezi Formation shale in the Changling fault depression of Songliao Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2019,40(9):1030-1044.
[14] SUN Mengdi,YU Bingsong,HU Qinhong,et al.Nanoscale pore characteristics of the Lower Cambrian Niutitang Formation shale:a case study from Well Yuke #1 in the southeast of Chongqing,China[J].International Journal of Coal Geology,2016,154-155:16-29.
[15] SUN Yinsen,GUO Shaobin.Characterization of whole-aperture pore structure and its effect on methane adsorption capacity for transitional shales[J].Energy & Fuels,2018,32(3):3176-3188.
[16] SLATT R M,O'BRIEN N R.Pore types in the Barnett and Woodford gas shales:contribution to understanding gas storage and migration pathways in fine-grained rocks[J].AAPG Bulletin,2011,95(12):2017-2030.
[17] MILLIKEN K L,RUDNICKI M,AWWILLER D N,et al.Organic matter-hosted pore system,Marcellus Formation (Devonian),Pennsylvania[J].AAPG Bulletin,2013,97(2):177-200.
[18] TIAN Hui,PAN Lei,ZHAGN Tongwei,et al.Pore characterization of organic-rich Lower Cambrian shales in Qiannan depression of Guizhou Province,Southwestern China[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,2015,62:28-43.
[19] 姜在兴,梁超,吴靖,等.含油气细粒沉积岩研究的几个问题[J].石油学报,2013,34(6):1031-1039.
JIANG Zaixing,LIANG Chao,WU Jing,et al.Several issues in sedimentological studies on hydrocarbon-bearing fine-grained sedimentary rocks[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2013,34(6):1031-1039.
[20] LI Tingwei,JIANG Zhenxue,LI Zhuo,et al.Continental shale pore structure characteristics and their controlling factors:a case study from the lower third member of the Shahejie Formation,Zhanhua sag,Eastern China[J].Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering,2017,45:670-692.
[21] 冯小龙,敖卫华,唐玄.陆相页岩气储层孔隙发育特征及其主控因素分析:以鄂尔多斯盆地长7段为例[J].吉林大学学报:地球科学版,2018,48(3):678-692.
FENG Xiaolong,AO Weihua,TANG Xuan.Characteristics of pore development and its main controlling factors of continental shale gas reservoirs:a case study of Chang 7 Member in Ordos Basin[J].Journal of Jilin Universty:Earth Science Edition,2018,48(3):678-692.
[22] YANG Chao,ZHAGN Jinchuan,TANG Xuan,et al.Comparative study on micro-pore structure of marine,terrestrial,and transitional shales in key areas,China[J].International Journal of Coal Geology,2017,171:76-92.
[23] JIANG Shu,TANG Xianglu,CAI Dongsheng,et al.Comparison of marine,transitional,and lacustrine shales:a case study from the Sichuan Basin in China[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,2017,150:334-347.
[24] 原园,姜振学,喻宸,等.高丰度低演化程度湖相页岩储层特征——以柴达木盆地北缘中侏罗统为例[J].地质学报,2016,90(3):541-552.
YUAN Yuan,JIANG Zhenxue,YU Chen,et al.Reservoir characteristics of high abundance and low thermal stage lacustrine shale:an example from the Middle Jurassic shale in the northern Qaidam Basin[J].Acta Geologica Sinica,2016,90(3):541-552.
[25] 柳波,王蕃,冉清昌,等.松辽盆地北部青一段含油泥页岩储集特征浅析[J].岩性油气藏,2014,26(5):64-68.
LIU Bo,WANG Fan,RAN Qingchang,et al.Characteristics of shale reservoir of the first member of Qingshankou Formation in northern Songliao Basin[J].Lithologic Reservoirs,2014,26(5):64-68.
[26] 管全中,董大忠,王淑芳,等.海相和陆相页岩储层微观结构差异性分析[J].天然气地球科学,2016,27(3):524-531.
GUAN Quanzhong,DONG Dazhong,WANG Shufang,et al.Analyses on differences of microstructure between marine and lacustrine facies shale reservoirs[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2016,27(3):524-531.
[27] WANG Pengfei,JIANG Zhenxue,CHEN Lei,et al.Pore structure characterization for the Longmaxi and Niutitang shales in the Upper Yangtze Platform,South China:evidence from focused ion beam-He ion microscopy,nano-computerized tomography and gas adsorption analysis[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,2016,77:1323-1337.
[28] 李廷微.沾化凹陷页岩储层孔隙结构特征及其对含油性的控制[D].北京:中国石油大学(北京),2018:36-41.
LI Tingwei.Pore structure characteristics of shale reservoirs and their effects on oil-bearing properties in the Zhanhua sag[D].Beijing:China University of Petroleum (Beijing),2018:36-41.
[29] 王玉满,董大忠,杨桦,等.川南下志留统龙马溪组页岩储集空间定量表征[J].中国科学:地球科学,2014,44(6):1348-1356.
WANG Yuman,DONG Dazhong,YANG Ye,et al.Quantitative characterization of reservoir space in the Lower Silurian Longmaxi shale,southern Sichuan,China[J].Science China:Earth Sciences,2014,57:313-322.
[30] ZHANG Jizhen,LI Xianqing,WEI Qiang,et al.Quantitative characterization of pore-fracture system of organic-rich marine-continental shale reservoirs:a case study of the Upper Permian Longtan Formation,Southern Sichuan Basin,China[J].Fuel,2017,200:272-281.
[31] CHEN Lei,JIANG Zhenxue,LIU Qingxin,et al.Mechanism of shale gas occurrence:insights from comparative study on pore structures of marine and lacustrine shales[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,2019,104:200-216.
[32] 郭旭升.涪陵页岩气田焦石坝区块富集机理与勘探技术[M].北京:科学出版社,2014:80-82.
GUO Xusheng.Enrichment mechanism and exploration technology for Jiaoshiba block of Fuling shale gas field[M].Beijing:Science Press,2014:80-82.
[33] MASTALERZ M,SCHIMMELMANN A,DROBNIAK A,et al.Porosity of Devonian and Mississippian New Albany shale across a maturation gradient:insights from organic petrology,gas adsorption,and mercury intrusion[J].AAPG Bulletin,2013,97(10):1621-1643.
[34] CAMP W.Diagenesis of organic-rich shale:views from Foraminifera Penetralia,Eagle Ford Formation,Maverick Basin,texas[C]//AAPG Rocky Mountain Section Meeting.Denver,Colorado:AAPG,2014.
[35] 纪文明.页岩气微-纳米储集孔家特征及赋存机理研究[D].北京:中国石油大学(北京),2017:74-78.
JI Wengming.Micro-nano reservoir characterization and storage mechanism of shale gas[D].Beijing:China University of Petroleum (Beijing),2017:74-78.
[36] 王香增,张丽霞,雷裕红,等.低熟湖相页岩内运移固体有机质和有机质孔特征——以鄂尔多斯盆地东南部延长组长7油层组页岩为例[J].石油学报,2018,39(2):141-151.
WANG Xiangzeng,ZHANG Lixia,LEI Yuhong,et al.Characteristics of migrated solid organic matters and organic pores in low maturity lacustrine shale:a case study of the shale in Chang 7 oil-bearing formation of Yanchang Formation,southeastern Ordos Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2018,39(2):141-151.
[37] 刘国恒,黄志龙,姜振学,等.鄂尔多斯盆地延长组湖相页岩纹层发育特征及储集意义[J].天然气地球科学,2015,26(3):408-417.
LIU Guoheng,HUANG Zhilong,JIANG Zhenxue,et al.The characteristic and reservoir significance of lamina in shale from Yanchang Formation of Ordos Basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2015,26(3):408-417.
[38] 孙建博,张丽霞,姜呈馥,等.鄂尔多斯盆地东南部延长组长7页岩气储层特征研究[J].油气藏评价与开发,2014,4(5):70-75.
SUN Jianbo,ZHANG Lixia,JIANG Chengfu,et al.Property research of Chang-7 shale gas reservoir in Yanchang Formation,southeast Ordos Basin[J].Reservoir Evaluation and Development,2014,4(5):70-75.
[39] 宁传祥,姜振学,高之业,等.用核磁共振和高压压汞定量评价储层孔隙连通性——以沾化凹陷沙三下亚段为例[J].中国矿业大学学报,2017,46(3):578-585.
NING Chuanxiang,JIANG Zhenxue,GAO Zhiye,et al.Quantitative evaluation of pore connectivity with nuclear magnetic resonance and high pressure mercury injection:a case study of the lower section of Es₃ in Zhanhua sag[J].Journal of China University of Mining & Technology,2017,46(3):578-585.
[40] 徐士林,包书景.鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组页岩气形成条件及有利发育区预测[J].天然气地球科学,2009,20(3):460-466.
XU Shilin,BAO Shujing.Preliminary analysis of shale gas resource potential and favorable areas in Ordos Basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience.2009,20(3):460-466.
[41] 姜呈馥,程玉群,范柏江,等.陆相页岩气的地质研究进展及亟待解决的问题——以延长探区上三叠统延长组长7段页岩为例[J].天然气工业,2014,34(2):27-33.
JIANG Chengfu,CHENG Yuqun,FAN Bojiang,et al.Progress in and challenges to geologic research of terrestrial shale in China:a case study from the 7th member of the Upper Triassic Yanchang Fm in the Yanchang exploration block,Ordos Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,2014,34(2):27-33.
[42] 师良,王香增,范柏江,等.鄂尔多斯盆地延长组砂质纹层发育特征与油气成藏[J].石油与天然气地质,2018,39(3):522-530.
SHI Liang,WANG Xiangzeng,FAN Bojiang,et al.Characteristics of sandy lamination and its hydrocarbon accumulation,Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2018,39(3):522-530.
[43] 金之钧,白振瑞,高波,等.中国迎来页岩油气革命了吗?[J].石油与天然气地质,2019,40(3):451-458.
JIN Zhijun,BAI Zhenrui,GAO Bo,et al.Has China ushered in the shale oil and gas revolution?[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2019,40(3):451-458.
[44] 蒲秀刚,金凤鸣,韩文中,等.陆相页岩油甜点地质特征与勘探关键技术——以沧东凹陷孔店组二段为例[J].石油学报,2019,40(8):997-1012.
PU Xiugang,JIN Fengming,HAN Wenzhong,et al.Sweet spots geological characteristics and key exploration technologies of continental shale oil:a case study of Member 2 of Kongdian Formation in Cangdong sag[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2019,40(8):997-1012.
[45] 赵贤正,周立宏,蒲秀刚,等.断陷湖盆湖相页岩油形成有利条件及富集特征——以渤海湾盆地沧东凹陷孔店组二段为例[J].石油学报,2019,40(9):1013-1029.
ZHAO Xianzheng,ZHOU Lihong,PU Xiugang,et al.Favorable Formation conditions and enrichment characteristics of lacustrine facies shale oil in faulted lake basin:a case study of Member 2 of Kongdian Formation in Cangdong sag,Bohai Bay Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2019,40(9):1013-1029.

海相与陆相页岩储层孔隙结构差异的影响因素

Influencing factors of pore structure differences between marine and terrestrial shale reservoirs

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	李国欣, 吴志宇, 李桢, 陈强, 鲜成刚, 刘合. 陆相源内非常规石油甜点优选与水平井立体开发技术实践 ——以鄂尔多斯盆地延长组7段为例[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(6): 736-750.
[2]	匡立春, 侯连华, 杨智, 吴松涛. 陆相页岩油储层评价关键参数及方法[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(1): 1-14.
[3]	陈治军, 张佳琪, 牛凌燕, 高怡文, 赵春晨, 王小多. 芳烃参数在湖相烃源岩成熟度评价中的适用性——以银根—额济纳旗盆地中生界烃源岩为例[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(8): 928-939.
[4]	马安来, 金之钧, 晏继发, 米敬奎, 李杰豪. 煤中金刚烷的分布与演化[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(7): 796-808.
[5]	斯尚华, 赵靖舟, 邹国亮, 李军, 孟祥宁, 刘超. 原油包裹体中芳香烃组分类型与成熟度关系——以三肇凹陷扶余油层为例[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(7): 835-840,864.
[6]	赵贤正, 周立宏, 蒲秀刚, 时战楠, 韩国猛, 吴佳朋, 韩文中, 张伟, 高欢欢, 马建英, 汪虎. 歧口凹陷歧北次凹沙河街组三段页岩油地质特征与勘探突破[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(6): 643-657.
[7]	杜学斌, 刘晓峰, 陆永潮, 刘惠民, 张守鹏, 马义权, 赵珂, 魏巍. 陆相细粒混合沉积分类、特征及发育模式——以东营凹陷为例[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(11): 1324-1333.
[8]	邹才能, 潘松圻, 荆振华, 高金亮, 杨智, 吴松涛, 赵群. 页岩油气革命及影响[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(1): 1-12.
[9]	何晶, 何生, 刘早学, 翟刚毅, 王亿, 韩元佳, 万阔, 魏思乐. 鄂西黄陵背斜南翼下寒武统水井沱组页岩孔隙结构与吸附能力[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(1): 27-42.
[10]	王强, 彭平安, 张文正, 刘金钟, 于赤灵. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组7段页岩全组分定量生烃模拟及原油可动性评价[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(5): 541-553.
[11]	陈建平, 魏军, 倪云燕, 陈建军, 邓春萍, 田多文, 胡健, 黄振凯, 张蒂嘉, 韩永科. 酒泉盆地酒西坳陷主力烃源岩分布及对油气勘探的启示[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(11): 1223-1240.
[12]	王冠民, 熊周海, 张婕, 付尧. 济阳坳陷古近系页岩文石含量与烃源岩热演化的对应关系[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38(8): 855-862.
[13]	刘文平, 张成林, 高贵冬, 罗超, 吴伟, 石学文, 张鉴, 李武广, 邓晓航, 胡晓华. 四川盆地龙马溪组页岩孔隙度控制因素及演化规律[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38(2): 175-184.
[14]	舒逸, 陆永潮, 刘占红, 王超, 毛华武. 海相页岩中斑脱岩发育特征及对页岩储层品质的影响——以涪陵地区五峰组—龙马溪组一段为例[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38(12): 1371-1380.
[15]	傅宁, 杨树春, 贺清, 徐微, 林青. 鄂尔多斯盆地东缘临兴-神府区块致密砂岩气高效成藏条件[J]. 石油学报, 2016, 37(S1): 111-120.