塔里木盆地油气勘探新领域、新类型及资源潜力

doi:10.7623/syxb202401002

石油学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (1): 15-32.DOI: 10.7623/syxb202401002

塔里木盆地油气勘探新领域、新类型及资源潜力

王清华^1,2, 徐振平^1,2, 张荣虎^2,3, 杨海军^1,2, 杨宪彰^1,2

1. 中国石油塔里木油田公司新疆库尔勒 841000;
2. 中国石油天然气集团有限公司超深层复杂油气藏勘探开发技术研发中心新疆库尔勒 841000;
3. 中国石油杭州地质研究院浙江杭州 310023

收稿日期:2023-07-31 修回日期:2023-10-19 出版日期:2024-01-25 发布日期:2024-02-20
通讯作者: 张荣虎,男,1976年9月生,2013年获中国石油勘探开发研究院博士学位,现为中国石油勘探开发研究院杭州地质研究院教授级高级工程师,主要从事碎屑岩沉积储层、成藏与天然气地质综合研究工作。Email:zrh_hz@petrochina.com.cn
作者简介:王清华,男,1968年10月生,2007年获浙江大学博士学位,现为中国石油塔里木油田公司教授级高级工程师,主要从事油气勘探开发管理及研究工作。Email:wqh-tlm@petrochina.com.cn
基金资助:
中国石油天然气集团有限公司基础性前瞻性重大科技专项"叠合盆地中下组合油气成藏与保持机制研究"（2023ZZ02）和国家重点研发计划"塔里木盆地盐下超深层油气分布规律及有利勘探区带评价"（2019YFC0605505）。

New fields, new types of hydrocarbon explorations and their resource potentials in Tarim Basin

Wang Qinghua^1,2, Xu Zhenping^1,2, Zhang Ronghu^2,3, Yang Haijun^1,2, Yang Xianzhang^1,2

1. PetroChina Tarim Oilfield Company, Xinjiang Korla 841000, China;
2. R&D Center for Ultra-Deep Complex Reservoir Exploration and Development, CNPC, Xinjiang Korla 841000, China;
3. PetroChina Hangzhou Research Institute of Geology, Zhejiang Hangzhou 310023, China

Received:2023-07-31 Revised:2023-10-19 Online:2024-01-25 Published:2024-02-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 塔里木盆地勘探面积广阔、油气资源量大、探明程度较低，是"十四五"（2021—2025年）规划中国油气增储上产的最重要压舱石之一。塔里木盆地的勘探研究面临着诸多世界级难题，如古老海相烃源灶、超深规模储层、超深层油气赋存、超长油气藏演化等，这些因素严重制约了塔里木盆地的整体效益勘探。基于近两年的露头、钻井、地球物理、分析测试等资料，对塔里木盆地油气勘探新领域、新类型中成藏关键要素的耦合模式和资源潜力开展了系统分析。研究结果表明：塔里木盆地主要发育台盆区寒武系盐下、奥陶系、石炭系、前陆区古生界—新生界4套区域性储-盖组合及含油气系统，其中，库车坳陷白垩系亚格列木组、库车坳陷南斜坡迎烃面古生界潜山、库车坳陷北部构造带（迪北地区）侏罗系致密气断缝体、塔西南地区石炭系—二叠系、台盆区寒武系盐下台缘带及阿瓦提凹陷西缘寒武系、台盆区奥陶系断溶体是油气勘探最重要的新领域新类型。库车前陆区古生界潜山及中生界的近源油气资源量巨大，其中，温宿—佳木地区古潜山的石油资源量超过2×10⁸t、天然气资源量约为600×10⁸m³，白垩系亚格列木组的天然气资源量约为10 500×10⁸m³、石油资源量超过4 300×10⁴t，北部构造带侏罗系阿合组的天然气资源量近2.6×10¹²m³、石油资源量约为1.3×10⁸t。台盆区寒武系盐下台缘带的天然气资源量近1.8×10¹²m³；阿瓦提凹陷西缘的天然气资源量约为4 400×10⁸m³、石油资源量约为1.4×10⁸t；富满—顺北地区奥陶系断溶体的油气资源量近32×10⁸t油当量。新领域、新类型油气勘探突破带来的地质和资源潜力新认识可为后续持续高效的勘探奠定稳定基础。

关键词: 塔里木盆地, 油气勘探, 新领域, 新类型, 资源潜力

Abstract: Tarim Basin is characterized by vast exploration areas, large amount of oil-gas reserves, and relatively low degree of exploration. It plays a crucial role as one of the key drivers for China's domestic oil-gas reserves and production during the "14th Five-Year Plan". However, numerous world-class challenges are encountered in the exploration of Tarim Basin, such as ancient marine source rocks, ultra-deep reservoirs, the occurrence of hydrocarbons in ultra-deep reservoirs, as well as the long-term evolution of oil-gas reservoirs, which significantly limit the overall efficiency of exploration in Tarim Basin. Through an integrated approach that combines the data of outcrops, well drilling, geophysics, and testing over the past two years, this paper systematically analyzes the coupling model of key factors for the new types of hydrocarbon accumulation in new prospecting fields of Tarim Basin, as well as resource potential in the study area. The research indicates that Tarim Basin mainly developed four regional reservoir-cap combinations and hydrocarbon systems, including Cambrian pre-salt, Ordovician, and Carboniferous reservoirs in the platform area of basin, as well as the Paleozoic to Cenozoic reservoirs in the foreland area. The most important new areas and types are shown as below:the Lower Cretaceous Yageliemu Formation in Kuqa depression, the Paleozoic buried hills on the south slope of Kuqa depression, the Jurassic tight gas fault-fracture bodies in the northern tectonic belt (Dibei area) of Kuqa depression, the Carboniferous-Permian strata in the southwest Tarim Basin, the Lower Cambrian platform margin belt in platform area and the Cambrian in the west margin of Awati sag, as well as Ordovician fault-karst bodies in the platform area. The near-source oil-gas resources in the Paleozoic buried hills and the Mesozoic of Kuqa foreland basin have enormous potential. The amount of oil and gas resources can reach 2×10⁸t and 600× 10⁸m³ in the paleo buried hills of Wensu-Jiamu area, respectively. The amount of gas and oil resources in the Cretaceous Yageliemu Formation is about 10 500×10⁸m³ and 4 300×10⁴t, respectively. In the northern tectonic belt of Kuqa depression, the natural gas and oil resources of the Jurassic Ahe Formation possess 2.6×10¹²m³ and 1.3×10⁸t, respectively. The Lower Cambrian pre-salt platform margin belt in the platform area contains 1.78×10¹²m³ of natural gas. The gas and oil resources are 4 400×10⁸m³ and 1.4×10⁸t in the west margin of Awati sag, respectively. The Ordovician fault-karst bodies has around 32×10⁸t of oil equivalent in the Fuman-Shunbei area. The insights into geological and resource potential gained from breakthroughs in exploring new fields and types of oil-gas resources can lay a solid foundation for further efficient exploration in the future.

Key words: Tarim Basin, oil and gas exploration, new fields, new types, resource potential

中图分类号:

TE132.1

王清华, 徐振平, 张荣虎, 杨海军, 杨宪彰. 塔里木盆地油气勘探新领域、新类型及资源潜力[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(1): 15-32.

Wang Qinghua, Xu Zhenping, Zhang Ronghu, Yang Haijun, Yang Xianzhang. New fields, new types of hydrocarbon explorations and their resource potentials in Tarim Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2024, 45(1): 15-32.

参考文献

[1] 贾承造, 顾家裕, 张光亚. 库车拗陷大中型气田形成的地质条件[J].科学通报, 2002, 47(增刊1):49-55.
JIA Chengzao, GU Jiayu, ZHANG Guangya.Geological constraints of giant and medium-sized gas fields in Kuqa depression[J].Chinese Science Bulletin, 2002, 47(S1):49-55.
[2] 贾承造, 魏国齐, 李本亮.中国中西部小型克拉通盆地群的叠合复合性质及其含油气系统[J].高校地质学报, 2005, 11(4):479-492.
JIA Chengzao, WEI Guoqi, LI Benliang.Superimposed-composite characteristics of micro-craton basins and its bearing petroleum systems, central-western China[J].Geological Journal of China Universities, 2005, 11(4):479-492.
[3] 何登发, 李德生, 何金有, 等.塔里木盆地库车坳陷和西南坳陷油气地质特征类比及勘探启示[J].石油学报, 2013, 34(2):201-218.
HE Dengfa, LI Desheng, HE Jinyou, et al.Comparison in petroleum geology between Kuqa depression and southwest depression in Tarim Basin and its exploration significance[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2013, 34(2):201-218.
[4] 金之钧.从源-盖控烃看塔里木台盆区油气分布规律[J].石油与天然气地质, 2014, 35(6):763-770.
JIN Zhijun.A study on the distribution of oil and gas reservoirs controlled by source-cap rock assemblage in unmodified foreland region of Tarim Basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology, 2014, 35(6):763-770.
[5] 鲁雪松, 柳少波, 李伟, 等.低勘探程度致密砂岩气区地质和资源潜力评价——以库车东部侏罗系致密砂岩气为例[J].天然气地球科学, 2014, 25(2):178-184.
LU Xuesong, LIU Shaobo, LI Wei, et al.Geological and resource evaluation in tight sandstone gas plays of low exploration degree:a case of Jurassic tight sandstone gas in east Kuqa Basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience, 2014, 25(2):178-184.
[6] 贾承造, 庞雄奇.深层油气地质理论研究进展与主要发展方向[J].石油学报, 2015, 36(12):1457-1469.
JIA Chengzao, PANG Xiongqi.Research processes and main development directions of deep hydrocarbon geological theories[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2015, 36(12):1457-1469.
[7] 李峰, 姜振学, 李卓, 等.库车坳陷迪北地区下侏罗统天然气富集机制[J].地球科学-中国地质大学学报, 2015, 40(9):1538-1548.
LI Feng, JIANG Zhenxue, LI Zhuo, et al.Enriched mechanism of natural gas of Lower Jurassic in Dibei area, Kuqa depression[J].Earth Science:Journal of China University of Geosciences, 2015, 40(9):1538-1548.
[8] 王招明, 李勇, 谢会文, 等.库车前陆盆地超深层大油气田形成的地质认识[J].中国石油勘探, 2016, 21(1):37-43.
WANG Zhaoming, LI Yong, XIE Huiwen, et al.Geological understanding on the formation of large-scale ultra-deep oil-gas field in Kuqa foreland Basin[J].China Petroleum Exploration, 2016, 21(1):37-43.
[9] 贾承造, 邹才能, 杨智, 等.陆相油气地质理论在中国中西部盆地的重大进展[J].石油勘探与开发, 2018, 45(4):546-560.
JIA Chengzao, ZOU Caineng, YANG Zhi, et al.Significant progress of continental petroleum geology theory in basins of central and western China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2018, 45(4):546-560.
[10] 王秋明, 张纪易.塔里木盆地四十年油气勘探的回顾与展望[J].新疆石油地质, 1992, 13(4):285-293.
WANG Qiuming, ZHANG Jiyi.Forty year's review and prospect for petroleum exploration in Tarim Basin[J].Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 1992, 13(4):285-293.
[11] 梁狄刚.塔里木盆地九年油气勘探历程与回顾(续完)[J].勘探家, 2000, 5(1):52-60.
LIANG Digang.Review of nine-year oil and gas exploration in Tarim Basin (continued end)[J].Petroleum Explorationist, 2000, 5(1):52-60.
[12] 漆立新.塔里木盆地下古生界碳酸盐岩大油气田勘探实践与展望[J].石油与天然气地质, 2014, 35(6):771-779.
QI Lixin.Exploration practice and prospects of giant carbonate field in the Lower Paleozoic of Tarim Basin[J].Oil & Geology, 2014, 35(6):771-779.
[13] 冯建辉, 蔡勋育, 牟泽辉, 等.中国石油化工股份有限公司"十二五"油气勘探进展与"十三五"展望[J].中国石油勘探, 2016, 21(3):1-13.
FENG Jianhui, CAI Xunyu, MOU Zehui, et al.Oil and gas exploration of China Petroleum and Chemical Corporation during the 12th Five-Year Plan and the prospect for the 13th Five-Year Plan[J].China Petroleum Exploration, 2016, 21(3):1-13.
[14] 张亘稼, 惠荣.塔里木盆地油气勘探工作"六上五下"的历程[J].西安石油大学学报:社会科学版, 2017, 26(3):19-26.
ZHANG Genjia, HUI Rong.The "6 on and 5 off" process of oil-gas exploration in Tarim Basin[J].Journal of Xi'an Shiyou University:Social Science Edition, 2017, 26(3):19-26.
[15] 金之钧, 蔡勋育, 刘金连, 等.中国石油化工股份有限公司近期勘探进展与资源发展战略[J].中国石油勘探, 2018, 23(1):14-25.
JIN Zhijun, CAI Xunyu, LIU Jinlian, et al.The recent exploration progress and resource development strategy of China Petroleum and Chemical Corporation[J].China Petroleum Exploration, 2018, 23(1):14-25.
[16] 田军.塔里木盆地油气勘探成果与勘探方向[J].新疆石油地质, 2019, 40(1):1-11.
TIAN Jun.Petroleum exploration achievements and future targets of Tarim Basin[J].Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2019, 40(1):1-11.
[17] 田军, 王清华, 杨海军, 等.塔里木盆地油气勘探历程与启示[J].新疆石油地质, 2021, 42(3):272-282.
TIAN Jun, WANG Qinghua, YANG Haijun, et al.Petroleum exploration history and enlightenment in Tarim Basin[J].Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2021, 42(3):272-282.
[18] 蔡勋育, 刘金连, 张宇, 等.中国石化"十三五"油气勘探进展与"十四五"前景展望[J].中国石油勘探, 2021, 26(1):31-42.
CAI Xunyu, LIU Jinlian, ZHANG Yu, et al.Oil and gas exploration progress of Sinopec during the 13th Five-Year Plan period and prospect forecast for the 14th Five-Year Plan[J].China Petroleum Exploration, 2021, 26(1):31-42.
[19] 李宗杰, 刘军, 张永升, 等.塔里木盆地中石化探区油气勘探进展、难点及技术需求[J].石油物探, 2023, 62(4):579-591.
LI Zongjie, LIU Jun, ZHANG Yongsheng, et al.Progress, difficulties, and technical requirements of oil and gas exploration of the Sinopec exploration area in the Tarim Basin[J].Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2023, 62(4):579-591.
[20] 黄少英, 杨文静, 卢玉红, 等.塔里木盆地天然气地质条件、资源潜力及勘探方向[J].天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(10):1497-1505.
HUANG Shaoying, YANG Wenjing, LU Yuhong, et al.Geological conditions, resource potential and exploration direction of natural gas in Tarim Basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience, 2018, 29(10):1497-1505.
[21] 王清华, 杨海军, 徐振平, 等.塔里木盆地库车坳陷克探1井重大突破与勘探意义[J].中国石油勘探, 2023, 28(2):1-10.
WANG Qinghua, YANG Haijun, XU Zhenping, et al.Major breakthrough and exploration significance of Well Ketan 1 in Kuqa depression, Tarim Basin[J].China Petroleum Exploration, 2023, 28(2):1-10.
[22] 周学文, 林会喜, 郭景祥, 等.塔里木盆地库车坳陷南斜坡新和地区白垩系亚格列木组沉积模式及油气意义[J].石油实验地质, 2023, 45(2):266-279.
ZHOU Xuewen, LIN Huixi, GUO Jingxiang, et al.Depositional model and petroleum significance of the Cretaceous Yageliemu Formation in Xinhe area on the southern slope of Kuqa depression, Tarim Basin[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2023, 45(2):266-279.
[23] 王清华, 杨海军, 蔡振忠, 等.塔里木盆地库车南斜坡托探1井油气勘探重大突破及意义[J].中国石油勘探, 2023, 28(5):28-42.
WANG Qinghua, YANG Haijun, CAI Zhenzhong, et al.Major breakthrough and significance of petroleum exploration in Well Tuotan 1 on the south slope of Kuqa depression, Tarim Basin[J].China Petroleum Exploration, 2023, 28(5):28-42.
[24] 陈永权, 严威, 韩长伟, 等.塔里木盆地寒武纪-早奥陶世构造古地理与岩相古地理格局再厘定:基于地震证据的新认识[J].天然气地球科学, 2015, 26(10):1831-1843.
CHEN Yongquan, YAN Wei, HAN Changwei, et al.Redefinition on structural paleogeography and lithofacies paleogeography framework from Cambrian to Early Ordovician in the Tarim Basin:a new approach based on seismic stratigraphy evidence[J].Natural Gas Geoscience, 2015, 26(10):1831-1843.
[25] 杨海军, 张荣虎, 杨宪彰, 等.超深层致密砂岩构造裂缝特征及其对储层的改造作用——以塔里木盆地库车坳陷克深气田白垩系为例[J].天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(7):942-950.
YANG Haijun, ZHANG Ronghu, YANG Xianzhang, et al.Characteristics and reservoir improvement effect of structural fracture in ultra-deep tight sandstone reservoir:a case study of Keshen gasfield, Kuqa depression, Tarim Basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience, 2018, 29(7):942-950.
[26] 杨战伟, 才博, 胥云, 等.库车山前超深巨厚储层缝网改造有效性评估[J].中国石油勘探, 2020, 25(6):105-111.
YANG Zhanwei, CAI Bo, XU Yun, et al.Effectiveness evaluation on network fracturing in ultra-deep and thick reservoirs in Kuqa piedmont[J].China Petroleum Exploration, 2020, 25(6):105-111.
[27] 张荣虎, 曾庆鲁, 王珂, 等.储层构造动力成岩作用理论技术新进展与超深层油气勘探地质意义[J].石油学报, 2020, 41(10):1278-1292.
ZHANG Ronghu, ZENG Qinglu, WANG Ke, et al.New progress in the theory and technology of tectonic diagenesis on reservoir and the geological significance of ultra-deep oil and gas exploration[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(10):1278-1292.
[28] 张荣虎, 魏国齐, 王珂, 等.前陆冲断带构造逆冲推覆作用与岩石响应特征——以库车坳陷东部中-下侏罗统为例[J].岩石学报, 2021, 37(7):2256-2270.
ZHANG Ronghu, WEI Guoqi, WANG Ke, et al.Tectonic thrust nappe activity and sandstone rock response characteristics in foreland thrust belt:a case study of Middle and Lower Jurassic, Kuqa depression, Tarim Basin[J].Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2021, 37(7):2256-2270.
[29] 唐雁刚, 杨宪彰, 谢会文, 等.塔里木盆地库车坳陷侏罗系阿合组致密气藏特征与勘探潜力[J].中国石油勘探, 2021, 26(4):113-124.
TANG Yangang, YANG Xianzhang, XIE Huiwen, et al.Tight gas reservoir characteristics and exploration potential of Jurassic Ahe Formation in Kuqa depression, Tarim Basin[J].China Petroleum Exploration, 2021, 26(4):113-124.
[30] 王珂, 杨海军, 李勇, 等.塔里木盆地库车坳陷北部构造带地质特征与勘探潜力[J].石油学报, 2021, 42(7):885-905.
WANG Ke, YANG Haijun, LI Yong, et al.Geological characteristics and exploration potential of the northern tectonic belt of Kuqa depression in Tarim Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2021, 42(7):885-905.
[31] 王清华, 张荣虎, 杨宪彰, 等.库车坳陷东部迪北地区侏罗系阿合组致密砂岩气勘探重大突破及地质意义[J].石油学报, 2022, 43(8):1049-1064.
WANG Qinghua, ZHANG Ronghu, YANG Xianzhang, et al.Major breakthrough and geological significance of tight sandstone gas exploration in Jurassic Ahe Formation in Dibei area, eastern Kuqa depression[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2022, 43(8):1049-1064.
[32] 王清华, 杨海军, 李勇, 等.塔西南山前地区恰探1井石炭系-二叠系重大突破与勘探前景[J].中国石油勘探, 2023, 28(4):34-45.
WANG Qinghua, YANG Haijun, LI Yong, et al.Major breakthrough in the Carboniferous-Permian in Well Qiatan 1 and exploration prospect in the piedmont southwestern Tarim Basin[J].China Petroleum Exploration, 2023, 28(4):34-45.
[33] 杜治利, 曾昌民, 邱海峻, 等.塔西南叶城凹陷二叠系两套烃源岩特征及柯东1井油源分析[J].吉林大学学报:地球科学版, 2016, 46(3):651-660.
DU Zhili, ZENG Changmin, QIU Haijun, et al.Key formations of the Permian hydrocarbon source rocks and oil-source correlation of well KD1 in Yecheng depression of southwestern Tarim Basin[J].Journal of Jilin University:Earth Science Edition, 2016, 46(3):651-660.
[34] 孟苗苗, 康志宏, 刘俊杰, 等.塔西南坳陷叶城-和田地区二叠系沉积特征研究[J].重庆科技学院学报:自然科学版, 2013, 15(2):39-44.
MENG Miaomiao, KANG Zhihong, LIU Junjie, et al.Research on the sedimentary characteristics of Permian in Yecheng-Hetian area of southwest Tarim Basin[J].Journal of Chongqing University of Science and Technology:Natural Sciences Edition, 2013, 15(2):39-44.
[35] 朱光有, 张水昌, 张斌, 等.中国中西部地区海相碳酸盐岩油气藏类型与成藏模式[J].石油学报, 2010, 31(6):871-878.
ZHU Guangyou, ZHANG Shuichang, ZHANG Bin, et al.Reservoir types of marine carbonates and their accumulation model in western and central China[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2010, 31(6):871-878.
[36] 杨海军, 陈永权, 田军, 等.塔里木盆地轮探1井超深层油气勘探重大发现与意义[J].中国石油勘探, 2020, 25(2):62-72.
YANG Haijun, CHEN Yongquan, TIAN Jun, et al.Great discovery and its significance of ultra-deep oil and gas exploration in Well Luntan-1 of the Tarim Basin[J].China Petroleum Exploration, 2020, 25(2):62-72.
[37] 倪新锋, 陈永权, 王永生, 等.塔里木盆地轮南地区深层寒武系台缘带新认识及盐下勘探区带——基于岩石学、同位素对比及地震相的新证据[J].海相油气地质, 2020, 25(4):289-302.
NI Xinfeng, CHEN Yongquan, WANG Yongsheng, et al.Recognition of platform margin and subsalt exploration prospect of deep-buried Cambrian in Lunnan area of Tarim Basin, northwest China:new understanding based on evidence of petrology, isotope comparison and seismic facies[J].Marine Origin Petroleum Geology, 2020, 25(4):289-302.
[38] 闫磊, 朱光有, 王珊, 等.塔里木盆地震旦系-寒武系万米超深层天然气成藏条件与有利区带优选[J].石油学报, 2021, 42(11):1446-1457.
YAN Lei, ZHU Guangyou, WANG Shan, et al.Accmulation conditions and favorable areas for natural gas accumulation in the 10 000 meters ultra-deep Sinian-Cambrian in Tarim Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2021, 42(11):1446-1457.
[39] 张君龙, 胡明毅, 汪爱云, 等.塔里木盆地古城台缘带寒武系丘滩体沉积构型特征及储层分布规律[J].石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(3):557-569.
ZHANG Junlong, HU Mingyi, WANG Aiyun, et al.Sedimentary configuration and reservoir distribution in the Cambrian mound-shoal complexes at platform margins of Gucheng area, Tarim Basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology, 2021, 42(3):557-569.
[40] 朱光有, 陈斐然, 陈志勇, 等.塔里木盆地寒武系玉尔吐斯组优质烃源岩的发现及其基本特征[J].天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(1):8-21.
ZHU Guangyou, CHEN Feiran, CHEN Zhiyong, et al.Discovery and basic characteristics of the high-quality source rocks of the Cambrian Yuertusi Formation in Tarim Basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience, 2016, 27(1):8-21.
[41] 朱光有, 胡剑风, 陈永权, 等.塔里木盆地轮探1井下寒武统玉尔吐斯组烃源岩地球化学特征与形成环境[J].地质学报, 2022, 96(6):2116-2130.
ZHU Guangyou, HU Jianfeng, CHEN Yongquan, et al.Geochemical characteristics and formation environment of source rock of the Lower Cambrian Yuertusi Formation in Well Luntan 1 in Tarim Basin[J].Acta Geologica Sinica, 2022, 96(6):2116-2130.
[42] 欧阳思琪, 吕修祥, 薛楠, 等.早中寒武世古环境特征与烃源岩发育模式——以塔里木盆地柯坪-巴楚地区为例[J].中国矿业大学学报, 2022, 51(2):293-310.
OUYANG Siqi, LÜ Xiuxiang, XUE Nan, et al.Paleoenvironmental characteristics and source rock development model of the Early-Middle Cambrian:a case of the Keping-Bachu area in the Tarim Basin[J].Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2022, 51(2):293-310.
[43] 朱光有, 闫慧慧, 陈玮岩, 等.塔里木盆地东部南华系-寒武系黑色岩系地球化学特征及形成与分布[J].岩石学报, 2020, 36(11):3442-3462.
ZHU Guangyou, YAN Huihui, CHEN Weiyan, et al.Geochemical characteristics, formation and distribution of the Nanhua-Cambrian black rock series in the eastern Tarim Basin[J].Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2020, 36(11):3442-3462.
[44] 易士威, 李明鹏, 郭绪杰, 等.塔里木盆地南华纪古裂谷对寒武系沉积的控制及勘探意义[J].石油学报, 2020, 41(11):1293-1308.
YI Shiwei, LI Mingpeng, GUO Xujie, et al.Control of the Nanhua paleo-rift on Cambrian sedimentation and its exploration significance in Tarim Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(11):1293-1308.
[45] 漆立新.塔里木盆地顺托果勒隆起奥陶系碳酸盐岩超深层油气突破及其意义[J].中国石油勘探, 2016, 21(3):38-51.
QI Lixin.Oil and gas breakthrough in ultra-deep Ordovician carbonate formations in Shuntuoguole uplift, Tarim Basin[J].China Petroleum Exploration, 2016, 21(3):38-51.
[46] 漆立新.塔里木盆地顺北超深断溶体油藏特征与启示[J].中国石油勘探, 2020, 25(1):102-111.
QI Lixin.Characteristics and inspiration of ultra-deep fault-karst reservoir in the Shunbei area of the Tarim Basin[J].China Petroleum Exploration, 2020, 25(1):102-111.
[47] 杨海军, 邓兴梁, 张银涛, 等.塔里木盆地满深1井奥陶系超深断控碳酸盐岩油气藏勘探重大发现及意义[J].中国石油勘探, 2020, 25(3):13-23.
YANG Haijun, DENG Xingliang, ZHANG Yintao, et al.Great discovery and its significance of exploration for Ordovician ultra-deep fault-controlled carbonate reservoirs of Well Manshen 1 in Tarim Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2020, 25(3):13-23.
[48] 杨海军, 李世银, 邓兴梁, 等.深层缝洞型碳酸盐岩凝析气藏勘探开发关键技术——以塔里木盆地塔中Ⅰ号气田为例[J].天然气工业, 2020, 40(2):83-89.
YANG Haijun, LI Shiyin, DENG Xingliang, et al.Key technologies for the exploration and development of deep fractured-vuggy carbonate condensate gas reservoirs:a case study of the Tazhong I gas field in the Tarim Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry, 2020, 40(2):83-89.
[49] 王清华, 杨海军, 汪如军, 等.塔里木盆地超深层走滑断裂断控大油气田的勘探发现与技术创新[J].中国石油勘探, 2021, 26(4):58-71.
WANG Qinghua, YANG Haijun, WANG Rujun, et al.Discovery and exploration technology of fault-controlled large oil and gas fields of ultra-deep formation in strike slip fault zone in Tarim Basin[J].China Petroleum Exploration, 2021, 26(4):58-71.
[50] 田军, 杨海军, 朱永峰, 等.塔里木盆地富满油田成藏地质条件及勘探开发关键技术[J].石油学报, 2021, 42(8):971-985.
TIAN Jun, YANG Haijun, ZHU Yongfeng, et al.Geological conditions for hydrocarbon accumulation and key technologies for exploration and development in Fuman oilfield, Tarim Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2021, 42(8):971-985.
[51] 马永生, 蔡勋育, 云露, 等.塔里木盆地顺北超深层碳酸盐岩油气田勘探开发实践与理论技术进展[J].石油勘探与开发, 2022, 49(1):1-17.
MA Yongsheng, CAI Xunyu, YUN Lu, et al.Practice and theoretical and technical progress in exploration and development of Shunbei ultra-deep carbonate oil and gas field, Tarim Basin, NW China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2022, 49(1):1-17.
[52] 郑和荣, 田景春, 胡宗全, 等.塔里木盆地奥陶系岩相古地理演化及沉积模式[J].石油与天然气地质, 2022, 43(4):733-745.
ZHENG Herong, TIAN Jingchun, HU Zongquan, et al.Lithofacies palaeogeographic evolution and sedimentary model of the Ordovician in the Tarim Basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(4):733-745.
[53] 王清华, 杨海军, 张银涛, 等.塔里木盆地富满油田富东1井奥陶系重大发现及意义[J].中国石油勘探, 2023, 28(1):47-58.
WANG Qinghua, YANG Haijun, ZHANG Yintao, et al.Great discovery and its significance in the Ordovician in Well Fudong 1 in Fuman oilfield, Tarim Basin[J].China Petroleum Exploration, 2023, 28(1):47-58.
[54] 王珊, 曹颖辉, 杜德道, 等.塔里木盆地柯坪-巴楚地区肖尔布拉克组储层特征与主控因素[J].天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(6):784-795.
WANG Shan, CAO Yinghui, DU Dedao, et al.The characteristics and main controlling factors of dolostone reservoir in Lower Cambrian Xiaoerbulak Formation in Keping-Bachu area, Tarim Basin, NW China[J].Natural Gas Geoscience, 2018, 29(6):784-795.
[55] 郑剑锋, 潘文庆, 沈安江, 等.塔里木盆地柯坪露头区寒武系肖尔布拉克组储集层地质建模及其意义[J].石油勘探与开发, 2020, 47(3):499-511.
ZHENG Jianfeng, PAN Wenqing, SHEN Anjiang, et al.Reservoir geological modeling and significance of Cambrian Xiaoerblak Formation in Keping outcrop area, Tarim Basin, NW China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(3):499-511.
[56] 刘丽红, 韩淼, 高永进, 等.塔西北地区寒武系肖尔布拉克组储层发育主控因素及成岩演化过程——以柯坪南1井为例[J].天然气地球科学, 2023, 34(5):763-779.
LIU Lihong, HAN Miao, GAO Yongjin, et al.Main reservoir controlling factors and diagenetic evolution of the Xiaoerbulak Formation of Tarim Basin, NW China:case study of Well Kepingnan 1 in Keping area[J].Natural Gas Geoscience, 2023, 34(5):763-779.
[57] 王振宇, 宁科科, 屈海洲, 等.阿克苏地区寒武系肖尔布拉克组不同白云岩的孔隙特征、成因及演化[J].沉积学报, 2023, 41(1):256-269.
WANG Zhenyu, NING Keke, QU Haizhou, et al.Pore characteristics, origin, and evolution of different dolomites in the Cambrian Xiaoerbulak Formation in the Aksu area[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2023, 41(1):256-269.
[58] 李建忠, 陶小晚, 白斌, 等.中国海相超深层油气地质条件、成藏演化及有利勘探方向[J].石油勘探与开发, 2021, 48(1):52-67.
LI Jianzhong, TAO Xiaowan, BAI Bin, et al.Geological conditions, reservoir evolution and favorable exploration directions of marine ultra-deep oil and gas in China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2021, 48(1):52-67.

塔里木盆地油气勘探新领域、新类型及资源潜力

New fields, new types of hydrocarbon explorations and their resource potentials in Tarim Basin

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	贾承造. 中国石油工业上游前景与未来理论技术五大挑战[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(1): 1-14.
[2]	席胜利, 闫伟, 刘新社, 张才利, 殷亮亮, 董国栋, 井向辉, 魏柳斌. 鄂尔多斯盆地天然气勘探新领域、新类型及资源潜力[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(1): 33-51,132.
[3]	王小军, 蒙启安, 李跃, 吴海波, 李军辉, 邓海, 申文静, 陈方举, 侯思宇, 张守庆. 海拉尔盆地油气勘探开发新领域、新类型及资源潜力[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(1): 99-114.
[4]	支东明, 李建忠, 周志超, 焦立新, 范谭广, 李斌, 梁辉, 王兴刚. 三塘湖盆地油气勘探开发新领域、新类型及资源潜力[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(1): 115-132.
[5]	王必金, 包汉勇, 吴世强, 郭战峰, 郭丽彬, 赵文, 李睿姗. 江汉盆地油气勘探新领域、新类型及资源潜力[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(1): 133-146,240.
[6]	张洪安, 李令喜, 陈清棠, 万晶, 史大海, 彭国桃, 周勇水. 银额盆地油气勘探新领域、新类型及资源潜力[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(1): 147-162.
[7]	徐长贵, 周家雄, 杨海风, 叶涛. 渤海海域油气勘探新领域、新类型及资源潜力[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(1): 163-182.
[8]	高阳东, 刘军, 彭光荣, 陈林, 王梓颐, 史玉玲. 珠江口盆地油气勘探新领域及资源潜力[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(1): 183-201.
[9]	邓勇, 胡德胜, 朱继田, 刘国昌, 陈奎, 童传新, 张道军, 徐新德, 满勇, 游君君, 满晓, 吴云鹏, 周刚, 张建新. 北部湾盆地油气成藏规律与勘探新领域、新类型、资源潜力[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(1): 202-225.
[10]	郭秋麟, 黄少英, 卢玉红, 王建, 吴晓智, 陈宁生. 塔里木盆地台盆区下古生界油气系统模拟及资源分布预测[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(9): 1459-1471.
[11]	陶士振, 胡素云, 王建, 白斌, 庞正炼, 王民, 陈燕燕, 陈悦, 杨怡青, 金旭, 贾进华, 张天舒, 林森虎, 孟元林, 刘鸿儒, 王岚, 吴因业. 中国陆相致密油形成条件、富集规律与资源潜力[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(8): 1222-1239.
[12]	陈利新, 贾承造, 姜振学, 苏洲, 杨美纯, 杨博, 邱晨. 塔里木盆地哈拉哈塘地区碳酸盐岩富油模式与主控因素[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(6): 948-961.
[13]	孔悦, 高晓鹏, 石开波, 刘波, 姜伟民, 于进鑫, 何卿, 吴淳. 塔北地区奥陶系鹰山组斑状白云岩成因及储层意义[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(4): 598-611.
[14]	申威, 唐军, 信毅, 曹磊, 陈文迪, 唐保勇, 何泽, 齐戈为. 塔里木盆地北部潜山岩溶相带定量表征与储层评价[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(3): 471-484.
[15]	魏国齐, 贾承造, 杨威. 安岳—奉节地区上震旦统—下寒武统陆架镶边台地地质特征及其对大气田(区)形成的控制作用[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(2): 223-240.