欠压实与流体膨胀成因超压的定量评价

doi:10.7623/syxb201809002

石油学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (9): 971-979.DOI: 10.7623/syxb201809002

欠压实与流体膨胀成因超压的定量评价

刘桃, 刘景东

中国石油大学地球科学与技术学院山东青岛 266580

收稿日期:2018-01-06 修回日期:2018-07-21 出版日期:2018-09-25 发布日期:2018-09-28
通讯作者: 刘景东,男,1984年9月生,2006年获中国石油大学(华东)学士学位,2011年获中国石油大学(华东)博士学位,现为中国石油大学(华东)地球科学与技术学院讲师,主要从事油气地质与勘探方面的教学与科研工作。Email:ljd840911@126.com
作者简介:刘桃,男,1994年3月生,2016年获中国石油大学(华东)学士学位,现为中国石油大学(华东)地球科学与技术学院硕士研究生,主要从事油气地质与勘探方向研究。Email:1115303614@qq.com
基金资助:
中国石油科技创新基金项目（2017D-5007-0101）、国家自然科学基金项目（No.41702142）和中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目（18CX02058A）资助。

Quantitative evaluation on overpressure generated from undercompaction and fluid expansion

Liu Tao, Liu Jingdong

School of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum, Shandong Qingdao 266580, China

Received:2018-01-06 Revised:2018-07-21 Online:2018-09-25 Published:2018-09-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

基于岩石应力-应变机理及岩石孔隙结构，研究了欠压实与流体膨胀成因超压的测井响应特征，建立了两种成因超压测井评价模型，并对东濮凹陷超压成因进行了定量评价。研究结果表明：欠压实成因超压下，地层"存储孔"与"连通孔"大于正常压实地层，体积属性、传导属性发生变化，导致地层呈高孔隙度、高声波时差、低密度、低电阻率特征；流体膨胀成因超压下，仅"连通孔"明显扩大，传导属性发生变化，而体积属性变化不大，导致地层孔隙度、密度不变，而声波时差增加、电阻率减小。基于不同成因超压所表现出的各种地质、测井响应差异，建立了声波时差/密度/电阻率-有效应力模型和声波时差/电阻率-密度模型，用于定量评价欠压实与流体膨胀成因超压的贡献大小。模型在东濮凹陷超压成因评价中得到了应用，应用结果显示东濮凹陷沙河街组二段和沙河街组三段超压以欠压实成因为主，总体贡献率为53%~92%，流体膨胀（生烃作用）成因超压主要分布于沙河街组三段，总体贡献率为8%~47%；平面上，由洼陷带、斜坡带至中央隆起带，流体膨胀（生烃作用）成因超压贡献率逐渐降低，欠压实成因超压贡献率逐渐增加。

关键词: 超压, 欠压实作用, 流体膨胀作用, 定量评价, 东濮凹陷

Abstract:

Based on rock stress-strain mechanisms and pore structure, this paper studies the logging response characteristics of overpressure generated from undercompaction and fluid expansion, has established the logging evaluation models of different overpressure causes, and quantitatively evaluate overpressure causes in Dongpu depression. The study suggests that under the overpressure induced by undercompaction, storage pores and interconnecting pores in strata with are bigger than those in normal compacted strata. Meanwhile, changes occurred to pore volume and conduction attributes, resulting in the stratum characteristics of high porosity, high AC, low density and low resistivity. However, under the overpressure induced by fluid expansion, only storage pores were enlarged evidently with obvious changes in conduction attributes and few changes in volume attributes, resulting in the stratum characteristics of constant porosity and density, the increased AC and decreased resistivity. Based on the various geology and logging responses caused by different types of overpressure, AC/DEN/R-effective stress model and AC/R-DEN model have been established to quantitatively evaluate the contribution of overpressure respectively induced by undercompaction and fluid expansion. The models are well applied to evaluate the causes of overpressure in Dongpu depression. The results show that in Dongpu depression, the overpressure generated from undercompaction predominates in Es₂ and Es₃ with the total contribution rate of 53% -92%, while that from fluid expansion (hydrocarbon generation) mainly distributes in Es₃ with total contribution rate of 8% -47%. Horizontally, from sag zone, slope zone to central uplift zone, the overpressure contribution rate of fluid expansion (hydrocarbon generation) gradually descends while that of undercompaction ascends.

Key words: overpressure, undercompaction, fluid expansion, quantitative evaluation, Dongpu depression

中图分类号:

TE122.2

刘桃, 刘景东. 欠压实与流体膨胀成因超压的定量评价[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(9): 971-979.

Liu Tao, Liu Jingdong. Quantitative evaluation on overpressure generated from undercompaction and fluid expansion[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2018, 39(9): 971-979.

参考文献

[1] HUNT J M.Generation and migration of petroleum from abnormally pressured fluid compartments[J]. AAPG Bulletin,1991,75(2):328-330.
[2] OSBORNE M J,SWARBRICK R E.Mechanisms for generating overpressure in sedimentary basins:a reevaluation[J].AAPG Bulletin,1997,81(6):1023-1041.
[3] 郝芳.超压盆地生烃作用动力学与油气成藏机理[M].北京:科学出版社,2005.
HAO Fang.Kinetics of hydrocarbon generation and mechanisms of petroleum accumulation in overpressured basins[M].Beijing:Science Press,2005.
[4] 蒋有录,王鑫,于倩倩,等.渤海湾盆地含油气凹陷压力场特征及与油气富集关系[J].石油学报,2016,37(11):1361-1369.
JIANG Youlu,WANG Xin,YU Qianqian,et al.Pressure field characteristics of petroliferous depressions and its relationship with hydrocarbon enrichment in Bohai Bay Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2016,37(11):1361-1369.
[5] 赵靖舟,李军,徐泽阳.沉积盆地超压成因研究进展[J].石油学报,2017,38(9):973-998.
ZHAO Jingzhou,LI Jun,XU Zeyang.Advances in the origin of overpressures in sedimentary basins[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2017,38(9):973-998.
[6] DICKINSON G.Geological aspects of abnormal reservoir pressures in Gulf Coast Louisiana[J].AAPG Bulletin,1953,37(8):410-432.
[7] 王冰洁.东营凹陷超压特征及演化与油气驱动机制[D].武汉:中国地质大学,2012.
WANG Bingjie.Overpressure distribution and evolution,dynamical mechanism of oil and gas,Dongying depression[D].Wuhan:China University of Geosciences,2012.
[8] 罗胜元.沾化凹陷渤南洼陷超压系统与油气成藏研究[D].武汉:中国地质大学,2014.
LUO Shengyuan.Study on the overpressure characteristic and hydrocarbon accumulation in Bonan depression,Zhanhua subbasin[D].Wuhan:China University of Geosciences,2014.
[9] 刘华,蒋有录,谷国翠,等.沾化凹陷渤南洼陷古近系压力特征及成因机制[J].中国石油大学学报:自然科学版,2013,37(4):46-51.
LIU Hua,JIANG Youlu,GU Guocui,et al.Pressure characteristics and formation mechanisms of Paleogene in Bonan sag,Zhanhua depression[J].Journal of China University of Petroleum:Edition of Natural Science,2013,37(4):46-51.
[10] TEIGE G M G,HERMANRUD C,WENSAAS L,et al.The lack of relationship between overpressure and porosity in North Sea and Haltenbanken shales[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,1999,16(4):321-335.
[11] TINGAY M R P,HILLIS R R,SWARBRICK R E,et al.Origin of overpressure and pore-pressure prediction in the Baram province,Brunei[J].AAPG Bulletin,2009,93(1):51-74.
[12] TINGAY M R P,MORLEY C K,LAIRD A,et al.Evidence for overpressure generation by kerogen-to-gas maturation in the northern Malay Basin[J].AAPG Bulletin,2013,97(4):639-672.
[13] HOLBROOK P W,MAGGIORI D A,HENSLEY R.Real-time pore pressure and fracture gradient evaluation in all sedimentary lithologies[J].SPE Formation Evaluation,1995,10(4):215-222.
[14] BOWERS G L.Pore pressure estimation from velocity data:accounting from overpressure mechanisms besides undercompaction:proceedings of the IADC/SPE drilling conference,Dallas,1994,(IADC/SPE),1994,pp 515-530[J].International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts,1995,31(6):276.
[15] O'CONNOR S,SWARBRICK R,LAHANN R.Geologically-driven pore fluid pressure models and their implications for petroleum exploration.Introduction to thematic set[J].Geofluids,2011,11(4):343-348.
[16] VAN RUTH P,HILLIS R,TINGATE P.The origin of overpressure in the Carnarvon Basin,Western Australia:implications for pore pressure prediction[J].Petroleum Geoscience,2004,10(3):247-257.
[17] 李小强,赵彦超.东濮凹陷柳屯洼陷盐湖盆地超压成因[J].石油与天然气地质,2012,33(5):686-694.
LI Xiaoqing,ZHAO Yanchao.Overpressure genesis in the Liutun salt-lake sag,Dongpu depression,Bohai Bay Basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2012,33(5):686-694.
[18] 王震亮,张立宽,施立志,等.塔里木盆地克拉2气田异常高压的成因分析及其定量评价[J].地质论评,2005,51(1):55-63.
WANG Zhenliang,ZHANG Likuan,SHI Lizhi,et al.Genesis analysis and quantitative evaluation on abnormal high fluid pressure in the Kela-2 gas field,Kuqa depression,Tarim Basin[J].Geological Review,2005,51(1):55-63.
[19] 石万忠,陈红汉,何生.库车坳陷构造挤压增压的定量评价及超压成因分析[J].石油学报,2007,28(6):59-65.
SHI Wanzhong,CHEN Honghan,HE Sheng.Quantitative evaluation on contribution of structural compression to overpressure and analysis on origin of overpressure in Kuqa depression[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2007,28(6):59-65.
[20] 郭小文,何生,郑伦举,等.生油增压定量模型及影响因素[J].石油学报,2011,32(4):637-644.
GUO Xiaowen,HE Sheng,ZHENG Lunju,et al.A quantitative model for the overpressure caused by oil generation and its influential factors[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2011,32(4):637-644.
[21] BOWERS G L,KATSUBE T J.The role of shale pore structure on the sensitivity of wire-line logs to overpressure[J].AAPG Memoir,2002,76:43-60.
[22] HERMANRUD C,WENSAAS L,TEIGE G M G,et al.Shale porosities from well logs on Haltenbanken (offshore Mid-Norway)show no influence of overpressuring[J].AAPG Memoir,1998,70:65-85.
[23] RAMDHAN A M,GOULTY N R.Overpressure and mudrock compaction in the Lower Kutai Basin,Indonesia:a radical reappraisal[J].AAPG Bulletin,2011,95(10):1725-1744.
[24] ZHANG Jincai.Pore pressure prediction from well logs:methods,modifications,and new approaches[J].Earth-Science Reviews,2011,108(1/2):50-63.
[25] 丁次乾.矿场地球物理[M].东营:石油大学出版社,2002.
DING Ciqian.Field geophysics[M].Dongying:China University of Petroleum Press,2002.
[26] 王盼,刘挺,唐峰.基于Gardner公式的岩石密度优化算法[J].录井工程,2016,27(4):12-15.
WANG Pan,LIU Ting,TANG Feng.Optimization algorithm of rock density based on Gardner formula[J].Mud Logging Engineering,2016,27(4):12-15.
[27] 刘景东,蒋有录,张园园,等.东濮凹陷古近系致密砂岩气成因与充注差异[J].石油学报,2017,38(9):1010-1020.
LIU Jingdong,JIANG Youlu,ZHANG Yuanyuan,et al.Genesis and charge difference of Paleogene tight sandstone gas in Dongpu sag[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2017,38(9):1010-1020.
[28] 梁正中,王镜惠,袁波,等.前梨园地区深层致密气超压特征及成藏效应[J].地球物理学进展,2017,32(2):684-688.
LIANG Zhengzhong,WANG Jinghui,YUAN Bo,et al.Overpressure feature and its implications on hydrocarbon accumulation of tight gas reservoirs in Qianliyuan depression[J].Progress in Geophysics,2017,32(2):684-688.
[29] 唐小云,龚晶晶,杨世刚,等.东濮凹陷文留地区古近系超压成因分析[J].油气地质与采收率,2007,14(5):20-22.
TANG Xiaoyun,GONG Jingjing,YANG Shigang,et al.Eogene overpressure origin analysis in Wenliu area of Dongpu depression[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2007,14(5):20-22.
[30] 吴楠,刘显凤,杨世刚,等.东濮凹陷白庙地区古近系超压成因机理[J].地质科技情报,2007,26(2):65-68.
WU Nan,LIU Xianfeng,YANG Shigang,et al.Eogene overpressure mechanism in Baimiao area of Dongpu depression[J].Geological Science and Technology Information,2007,26(2):65-68.

欠压实与流体膨胀成因超压的定量评价

Quantitative evaluation on overpressure generated from undercompaction and fluid expansion

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	侯志强, 张书平, 李军, 赵靖舟, 刘云, 田连辉, 仲晓, 陈梦娜, 徐泽阳. 西湖凹陷中部西斜坡地区超压成因机制[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(9): 1059-1068,1124.
[2]	郭荣涛, 马达德, 张永庶, 刘波, 陈晓冬, 崔俊, 王鹏, 张庆辉, 姜营海, 李亚锋. 柴达木盆地英西地区下干柴沟组上段超压孔缝型储层特征及形成机理[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(4): 411-422.
[3]	高志勇, 王晓琦, 李建明, 崔京钢, 金旭, 周川闽, 冯佳睿, 石雨昕. 库车坳陷克拉苏构造带白垩系储层孔喉组合类型定量表征与展布[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(6): 645-659.
[4]	鲁雪松, 赵孟军, 刘可禹, 卓勤功, 范俊佳, 于志超, 公言杰. 库车前陆盆地深层高效致密砂岩气藏形成条件与机理[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(4): 365-378.
[5]	李文, 何生, 张柏桥, 何治亮, 陈曼霏, 张殿伟, 李天义, 高键. 焦石坝背斜西缘龙马溪组页岩复合脉体中流体包裹体的古温度及古压力特征[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(4): 402-415.
[6]	陈奎, 李茂, 邹明生, 孙晓晖, 高凌, 朱绍鹏. 涠西南凹陷涠洲组构造圈闭有效性定量评价技术及应用[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(12): 1370-1378.
[7]	赵靖舟, 李军, 徐泽阳. 沉积盆地超压成因研究进展[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38(9): 973-998.
[8]	刘景东, 蒋有录, 张园园, 徐田武, 慕小水, 万涛. 东濮凹陷古近系致密砂岩气成因与充注差异[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38(9): 1010-1020.
[9]	黄成刚, 常海燕, 崔俊, 李亚锋, 路艳平, 李翔, 马新民, 吴梁宇. 柴达木盆地西部地区渐新世沉积特征与油气成藏模式[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38(11): 1230-1243.
[10]	薛欣宇, 刘宗堡, 张云峰, 方庆. 三角洲外前缘亚相储层井间连通性定量评价——以大庆长垣萨尔图油田南二区东部为例[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38(11): 1275-1283,1319.
[11]	蒋有录, 王鑫, 于倩倩, 王永诗, 刘华, 景琛. 渤海湾盆地含油气凹陷压力场特征及与油气富集关系[J]. 石油学报, 2016, 37(11): 1361-1369.
[12]	姜航, 庞雄奇, 陈冬霞, 陈迪. 含油气盆地深层有效砂岩储层判别与定量评价——以塔里木盆地库车坳陷深层为例[J]. 石油学报, 2015, 36(S2): 112-119.
[13]	范昌育, 王震亮, 王爱国, 张骁, 张永庶, 孔红喜. 柴达木盆地北缘鄂博梁构造带超压形成机制与高压气、水层成因[J]. 石油学报, 2015, 36(6): 699-706,714.
[14]	许玉强, 管志川, 许传斌, 张洪宁, 张会增. 深水钻井井筒中天然气水合物生成风险评价方法[J]. 石油学报, 2015, 36(5): 633-640.
[15]	高红灿, 郑荣才, 肖应凯, 孟凡巍, 陈发亮, 白工, 栾艳春, 谭先锋, 施玉娥. 渤海湾盆地东濮凹陷古近系沙河街组盐岩成因——来自沉积学和地球化学的证据[J]. 石油学报, 2015, 36(1): 19-32.