断陷湖盆湖相页岩油形成有利条件及富集特征——以渤海湾盆地沧东凹陷孔店组二段为例

doi:10.7623/syxb201909001

石油学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (9): 1013-1029.DOI: 10.7623/syxb201909001

• 地质勘探 • 下一篇

断陷湖盆湖相页岩油形成有利条件及富集特征——以渤海湾盆地沧东凹陷孔店组二段为例

赵贤正, 周立宏, 蒲秀刚, 金凤鸣, 时战楠, 肖敦清, 韩文中, 姜文亚, 张伟, 汪虎

中国石油大港油田公司天津 300280

收稿日期:2019-07-30 修回日期:2019-08-12 出版日期:2019-09-25 发布日期:2019-10-15
通讯作者: 赵贤正,男,1962年10月生,1986年获华东石油学院学士学位,2005年获中国石油大学(北京)博士学位,现为中国石油大港油田公司总经理、教授级高级工程师、李四光地质科学奖及孙越崎能源大奖获得者,主要从事油气勘探与开发研究和管理工作。Email:xzzhao@petrochina.com.cn
作者简介:赵贤正,男,1962年10月生,1986年获华东石油学院学士学位,2005年获中国石油大学(北京)博士学位,现为中国石油大港油田公司总经理、教授级高级工程师、李四光地质科学奖及孙越崎能源大奖获得者,主要从事油气勘探与开发研究和管理工作。Email:xzzhao@petrochina.com.cn
基金资助:
中国石油天然气股份有限公司科技重大专项"大港油区效益增储稳产关键技术研究与应用"（2018E-11）资助。

Favorable formation conditions and enrichment characteristics of lacustrine facies shale oil in faulted lake basin: a case study of Member 2 of Kongdian Formation in Cangdong sag,Bohai Bay Basin

Zhao Xianzheng, Zhou Lihong, Pu Xiugang, Jin Fengming, Shi Zhannan, Xiao Dunqing, Han Wenzhong, Jiang Wenya, Zhang Wei, Wang Hu

PetroChina Dagang Oilfield Company, Tianjin 300280, China

Received:2019-07-30 Revised:2019-08-12 Online:2019-09-25 Published:2019-10-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

有别于北美海相页岩油气，中国湖相页岩油地质特征十分复杂，湖相页岩油是否具备形成的条件、如何寻找富集层段等问题亟待解决。为了探究湖相页岩油形成的有利条件与富集特征，以渤海湾盆地黄骅坳陷沧东凹陷孔店组二段为例，综合利用G108-8井、GD12井和GD14井3口取心井的635.8 m取心资料、12 000余块次分析化验资料及20口井的试油、试采资料，从页岩油形成的烃源岩、沉积组构及热演化等方面，对湖相页岩油成藏机理等进行了系统分析。研究结果发现：广泛分布多类型高丰度有机质、高脆性矿物组成、高密度纹层结构及中等热演化阶段是页岩油形成富集的主要条件；湖相页岩层系可划分为纹层状长英质页岩、纹层状混积质页岩、薄层状含灰白云质页岩及厚层状含灰白云质页岩4类组构相，处于中等热演化成熟阶段的纹层状长英质页岩、纹层状混积质页岩组构相为最优组构相类型；S₁^*/TOC值（以单位有机碳的含油量表示）平均大于135 mg/g、滞留烃含量大于阈值100 mg/g的超越效应明显，揭示了"优势组构相-滞留烃超越效应"的页岩油富集特征。采用这一新认识有效指导了页岩油勘探，研究区GD1702H井最高产油量达61 m³/d，自喷生产已超416 d，产量基本稳定在17 m³/d，GD1701H井、GD1702H井两口水平井累积产油量超1.4×10⁴t，证实了中国东部湖相页岩油具备工业性开发的良好潜力。

关键词: 湖相, 页岩油, 组构相, 超越效应, 富集特征, 孔店组二段, 沧东凹陷

Abstract:

Different from the North American marine facies shale oil, the China lacustrine facies shale oil presents very complex geological characteristics. It is urgently required to find out whether the geological conditions are suitable for the formation of lacustrine facies shale oil, and how to locate the enrichment zones of shale oil. This paper takes the Member 2 of Kongdian Formation of Cangdong sag in the Huanghua depression of Bohai Bay Basin as an example to explore the main controlling factors and enrichment characteristics of lacustrine facies shale oil. Comprehensively using the 635.8 m cores from Well G108-8, GD12 and GD14, analytical test data of more than 12 000 pieces of core samples, as well as well testing and pilot production data of 20 wells, the accumulation mechanism of lacustrine facies shale oil have been analyzed in terms of source rock, sedimentary texture and thermal evolution. The study shows that widely distributed, multi-type and high abundance organic matter, composition of highly brittle minerals, high-density laminaed structure and moderate thermal evolution are the main factors for shale oil formation and enrichment. The lacustrine shale strata are classified into four types of tectonic facies, i.e., laminated felsic shale, lamellar diamictic shale, thinly laminated limy dolomite shale and thick laminated limy dolomite shale. It has been confirmed that laminated felsic shale and lamellar diamictic shale in the moderate thermal evolution stage have the best tectonic facies, and the S₁^*/TOC is greater than 135 mg/g. This has revealed the shale oil enrichment characteristic of "favorable tectonic facies and transcendence effect of retained hydrocarbon". The new understanding can effectively guide shale oil exploration. Thus, Well GD1702H achieved the highest daily oil production of 61 m³; the natural flow well has been producing over 416 days, and the production is basically stabilized at 17 m³/d. Two horizontal wells, GD1701H and GD1702H, have a cumulative output exceeding 14 000 tons, proving that the lacustrine facies shale oil in the eastern China has a good potential for industrial development.

Key words: lacustrine facies, shale oil, fabric facies, transcendence effect, enrichment characteristics, Member 2 of Kongdian Formation, Cangdong sag

中图分类号:

TE122

赵贤正, 周立宏, 蒲秀刚, 金凤鸣, 时战楠, 肖敦清, 韩文中, 姜文亚, 张伟, 汪虎. 断陷湖盆湖相页岩油形成有利条件及富集特征——以渤海湾盆地沧东凹陷孔店组二段为例[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(9): 1013-1029.

Zhao Xianzheng, Zhou Lihong, Pu Xiugang, Jin Fengming, Shi Zhannan, Xiao Dunqing, Han Wenzhong, Jiang Wenya, Zhang Wei, Wang Hu. Favorable formation conditions and enrichment characteristics of lacustrine facies shale oil in faulted lake basin: a case study of Member 2 of Kongdian Formation in Cangdong sag,Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2019, 40(9): 1013-1029.

参考文献

[1] 邹才能,陶士振,侯连华,等.非常规油气地质[M].2版.北京:地质出版社,2013:1-372.
ZOU Caineng,TAO Shizhen,HOU Lianhua,et al.Unconventional petroleum geology[M].2nd ed.Beijing:Geological Publishing House,2013:1-372.
[2] 陈祥,王敏,严永新,等.陆相页岩油勘探[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2015:1-238.
CHEN Xiang,WANG Min,YAN Yongxin,et al.Continental shale oil exploration[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2015:1-238.
[3] 张林晔,李钜源,李政,等.陆相盆地页岩油气地质研究与实践[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2017:1-327.
ZHANG Linye,LI Juyuan,LI Zheng,et al.Geological research and practice of shale oil and gas in continental Basin[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2017:1-327.
[4] 刘成林,李冰,吴林强,等.松辽盆地上白垩统页岩油地质条件评价[M].北京:地质出版社,2016:1-203.
LIU Chenglin,LI Bing,WU Linqiang,et al.Evaluation on Cretaceous geological conditions of oil shale in Songliao Basin[M].Beijing:Geological Publishing House,2016:1-203.
[5] 陈祥,王敏,严永新,等.泌阳凹陷陆相页岩油气成藏条件[J].石油与天然气地质,2011,32(4):568-576.
CHEN Xiang,WANG Min,YAN Yongxin,et al.Accumulation conditions for continental shale oil and gas in the Biyang depression[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2011,32(4):568-576.
[6] 梁世君,黄志龙,柳波,等.马朗凹陷芦草沟组页岩油形成机理与富集条件[J].石油学报,2012,33(4):588-594.
LIANG Shijun,HUANG Zhilong,LIU Bo,et al.Formation mechanism and enrichment conditions of Lucaogou Formation shale oil from Malang sag,Santanghu Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2012,33(4):588-594.
[7] 柳波,吕延防,赵荣,等.三塘湖盆地马朗凹陷芦草沟组泥页岩系统地层超压与页岩油富集机理[J].石油勘探与开发,2012,39(6):699-705.
LIU Bo,LÜ Yanfang,ZHAO Rong,et al.Formation overpressure and shale oil enrichment in the shale system of Lucaogou Formation,Malang sag,Santanghu Basin,NW China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2012,39(6):699-705.
[8] 卢双舫,黄文彪,陈方文,等.页岩油气资源分级评价标准探讨[J].石油勘探与开发,2012,39(2):249-256.
LU Shuangfang,HUANG Wenbiao,CHEN Fangwen,et al.Classification and evaluation criteria of shale oil and gas resources:discussion and application[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2012,39(2):249-256.
[9] 张善文,王永诗,张林晔,等.济阳坳陷渤南洼陷页岩油气形成条件研究[J].中国工程科学,2012,14(6):49-55.
ZHANG Shanwen,WANG Yongshi,ZHANG Linye,et al.Formation conditions of shale oil and gas in Bonan sub-sag,Jiyang depression[J].Engineering Sciences,2012,14(6):49-55.
[10] 邹才能,朱如凯,吴松涛,等.常规与非常规油气聚集类型、特征、机理及展望——以中国致密油和致密气为例[J].石油学报,2012,33(2):173-187.
ZOU Caineng,ZHU Rukai,WU Songtao,et al.Types,characteristics,genesis and prospects of conventional and unconventional hydrocarbon accumulations:taking tight oil and tight gas in China as an instance[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2012,33(2):173-187.
[11] 邹才能,杨智,崔景伟,等.页岩油形成机制、地质特征及发展对策[J].石油勘探与开发,2013,40(1):14-26.
ZOU Caineng,YANG Zhi,CUI Jingwei,et al.Formation mechanism,geological characteristics and development strategy of nonmarine shale oil in China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2013,40(1):14-26.
[12] 李吉君,史颖琳,章新文,等.页岩油富集可采主控因素分析:以泌阳凹陷为例[J].地球科学-中国地质大学学报,2014,39(7):848-857.
LI Jijun,SHI Yinglin,ZHANG Xinwen,et al.Control Factors of enrichment and producibility of shale oil:a case study of Biyang depression[J].Earth Science-Journal of China University of Geosciences,2014,39(7):848-857.
[13] 姜在兴,张文昭,梁超,等.页岩油储层基本特征及评价要素[J].石油学报,2014,35(1):184-196.
JIANG Zaixing,ZHANG Wenzhao,LIANG Chao,et al.Characteristics and evaluation elements of shale oil reservoir[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2014,35(1):184-196.
[14] 黄文彪,邓守伟,卢双舫,等.泥页岩有机非均质性评价及其在页岩油资源评价中的应用——以松辽盆地南部青山口组为例[J].石油与天然气地质,2014,35(5):704-711.
HUANG Wenbiao,DENG Shouwei,LU Shuangfang,et al.Shale organic heterogeneity evaluation method and its application to shale oil resource evaluation:a case study from Qingshankou Formation,southern Songliao Basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2014,35(5):704-711.
[15] 卢双舫,陈国辉,王民,等.辽河坳陷大民屯凹陷沙河街组四段页岩油富集资源潜力评价[J].石油与天然气地质,2016,37(1):8-14.
LU Shuangfang,CHEN Guohui,WANG Min,et al.Potential evaluation of enriched shale oil resource of Member 4 of the Shahejie Formation in the Damintun sag,Liaohe depression[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2016,37(1):8-14.
[16] 李志明,刘鹏,钱门辉,等.湖相泥页岩不同赋存状态油定量对比——以渤海湾盆地东营凹陷页岩油探井取心段为例[J].中国矿业大学学报,2018,47(6):1252-1263.
LI Zhiming,LIU Peng,QIAN Menhui,et al.Quantitative comparison of different occurrence oil for lacustrine shale:a case from cored interval of shale oil special drilling wells in Dongying depression,Bohai Bay Basin[J].Journal of China University of Mining & Technology,2018,47(6):1252-1263.
[17] 宁方兴,王学军,郝雪峰,等.济阳坳陷不同岩相页岩油赋存机理[J].石油学报,2017,38(2):185-195.
NING Fangxing,WANG Xuejun,HAO Xuefeng,et al.Occurrence mechanism of shale oil with different lithofacies in Jiyang depression[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2017,38(2):185-195.
[18] 王勇,刘惠民,宋国奇,等.湖相泥页岩中碳酸盐成因及页岩油气地质意义——以东营凹陷沙河街组四段上亚段-沙河街组三段下亚段烃源岩为例[J].石油学报,2017,38(12):1390-1400.
WANG Yong,LIU Huimin,SONG Guoqi,et al.Carbonate genesis and geological significance of shale hydrocarbon in lacustrine facies mud shale:a case study of source rocks in the upper submember of Member 4 and lower submember of Member 3 of Shahejie Formation,Dongying sag[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2017,38(12):1390-1400.
[19] 张顺,刘惠民,王敏,等.东营凹陷页岩油储层孔隙演化[J].石油学报,2018,39(7):754-766.
ZHANG Shun,LIU Huimin,WANG Min,et al.Pore evolution of shale oil reservoirs in Dongying sag[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2018,39(7):754-766.
[20] 蒲秀刚,韩文中,周立宏,等.黄骅坳陷沧东凹陷孔二段高位体系域细粒相区岩性特征及地质意义[J].中国石油勘探,2015,20(5):30-40.
PU Xiugang,HAN Wenzhong,ZHOU Lihong,et al.Lithologic characteristics and geological implication of fine-grained sedimentation in Ek2 high stand system tract of Cangdong sag,Huanghua depression[J]. China Petroleum Exploration,2015,20(5):30-40.
[21] 鄢继华,蒲秀刚,周立宏,等.基于X射线衍射数据的细粒沉积岩岩石定名方法与应用[J].中国石油勘探,2015,20(1):48-54.
YAN Jihua,PU Xiugang,ZHOU Lihong,et al.Naming method of fine-grained sedimentary rocks on basis of X-ray diffraction data[J].China Petroleum Exploration,2015,20(1):48-54.
[22] 周立宏,蒲秀刚,邓远,等.细粒沉积岩研究中几个值得关注的问题[J].岩性油气藏,2016,28(1):6-15.
ZHOU Lihong,PU Xiugang,DENG Yuan,et al.Several issues in studies on fine-grained sedimentary rocks[J].Lithologic Reservoirs,2016,28(1):6-15.
[23] 蒲秀刚,周立宏,韩文中,等.细粒相沉积地质特征与致密油勘探——以渤海湾盆地沧东凹陷孔店组二段为例[J].石油勘探与开发,2016,43(1):24-33.
PU Xiugang,ZHOU Lihong,HAN Wenzhong,et al.Geologic features of fine-grained facies sedimentation and tight oil exploration:a case from the second Member of Paleogene Kongdian Formation of Cangdong sag,Bohai Bay Basin[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2016,43(1):24-33.
[24] 赵贤正,蒲秀刚,韩文中,等.细粒沉积岩性识别新方法与储集层甜点分析——以渤海湾盆地沧东凹陷孔店组二段为例[J].石油勘探与开发,2017,44(4):492-502.
ZHAO Xianzheng,PU Xiugang,HAN Wenzhong,et al.A new method for lithology identification of fine grained deposits and reservoir sweet spot analysis:a case study of Kong 2 Member in Cangdong sag,Bohai Bay Basin,China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2017,44(4):492-502.
[25] 鄢继华,邓远,蒲秀刚,等.渤海湾盆地沧东凹陷孔二段细粒混合沉积岩特征及控制因素[J].石油与天然气地质,2017,38(1):98-109.
YAN Jihua,DENG Yuan,PU Xiugang,et al.Characteristics and controlling factors of fine-grained mixed sedimentary rocks from the 2nd Member of Kongdian Formation in the Cangdong sag,Bohai Bay Basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2017,38(1):98-109.
[26] 赵贤正,周立宏,蒲秀刚,等.陆相湖盆页岩层系基本地质特征与页岩油勘探突破——以渤海湾盆地沧东凹陷古近系孔店组二段一亚段为例[J].石油勘探与开发,2018,45(3):361-372.
ZHAO Xianzheng,ZHOU Lihong,PU Xiugang,et al.Geological characteristics of shale rock system and shale oil exploration breakthrough in a Lacustrine Basin:a case study from the Paleogene 1st sub-member of Kong 2 Member in Cangdong sag,Bohai Bay Basin,China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2018,45(3):361-372.
[27] 蒲秀刚,时战楠,韩文中,等.陆相湖盆细粒沉积区页岩层系石油地质特征与油气发现——以黄骅坳陷沧东凹陷孔二段为例[J].油气地质与采收率,2019,26(1):46-58.
PU Xiugang,SHI Zhannan,HAN Wenzhong,et al.Petroleum geological characteristics and hydrocarbon discovery of shale system in fine-grained sedimentary area of Lacustrine Basin:a case study of Kong 2 Member in Cangdong sag,Huanghua depression[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2019,26(1):46-58.
[28] ZHAO Xianzheng,ZHOU Lihong,PU Xiugang,et al.The sedimentary structure and petroleum geologic significance of the ring belt of the closed lake basin:an integrated interpretation of well and seismic data of the Kong2 Member in Cangdong sag,Central Bohai Bay Basin,China[J].Interpretation,2018,6(2):T283-T298.
[29] ZHAO Xianzheng,ZHOU Lihong,PU Xiugang,et al.Exploration breakthroughs and geological characteristics of continental shale oil:a case study of the Kongdian Formation in the Cangdong sag,China[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,2019,102:544-556.
[30] 蒲秀刚,金凤鸣,韩文中,等.陆相页岩油甜点地质特征与勘探关键技术——以沧东凹陷孔店组二段为例[J]. 石油学报,2019,40(8):997-1012.
PU Xiugang,JIN Fengming,HAN Wenzhong,et al.Sweets pots geological characteristics and key exploration technologies of continental shale oil:a case study of Member 2 of Kongdian Formation in Cangdong sag[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2019,40(8):997-1012.
[31] 李三忠,索艳慧,周立宏,等.华北克拉通内部的拉分盆地:渤海湾盆地黄骅坳陷结构构造与演化[J].吉林大学学报:地球科学版,2011,41(5):1362-1379.
LI Sanzhong,SUO Yanhui,ZHOU Lihong,et al.Pull-apart basins within the north China craton:structural pattern and evolution of Huanghua depression in Bohai Bay Basin[J].Journal of Jilin University:Earth Science Edition,2011,41(5):1362-1379.
[32] 任建业,廖前进,卢刚臣,等.黄骅坳陷构造变形格局与演化过程分析[J].大地构造与成矿学,2010,34(4):461-472.
REN Jianye,LIAO Qianjin,LU Gangchen,et al.Deformation framework and evolution of the Huanghua depression,Bohai Gulf[J].Geotectonica et Metallogenia,2010,34(4):461-472.
[33] 李明刚,杨桥,张健.黄骅拗陷新生代构造样式及其演化[J].西南石油大学学报:自然科学版,2011,33(1):71-77.
LI Minggang,YANG Qiao,ZHANG Jian.The Cenozoic structural style and its evolution in Huanghua depression[J].Journal of Southwest Petroleum University:Science & Technology Edition,2011,33(1):71-77.
[34] 刘招君,孙平昌,柳蓉,等.页岩能源共生矿产成矿(藏)地质条件研究——以松辽盆地上白垩统青山口组为[J].沉积学报,2014,32(3):593-600.
LIU Zhaojun,SUN Pingchang,LIU Rong,et al.Research on geological conditions of shale coexistent energy mineralization (accumulation):take the Qingshankou Formation in Upper Cretaceous,Songliao Basin for example[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2014,32(3):593-600.
[35] JARVIE D M,HILL R J,RUBLE T E,et al.Unconventional shale-gas systems:the Mississippian Barnett Shale of north-central Texas as one model for thermogenic shale-gas assessment[J].AAPG Bulletin,2007,91(4):475-499.
[36] 谌卓恒,黎茂稳,姜春庆,等,页岩油的资源潜力及流动性评价方法——以西加拿大盆地上泥盆统Duvernay页岩为例[J].石油与天然气地质,2019,40(3):459-468.
CHEN Zhuoheng,LI Maowen,JIANG Chunqing,et al.Shale oil resource potential and its mobility assessment:a case study of Upper Devonian Duvernay shale in Western Canada Sedimentary Basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2019,40(3):459-468.
[37] CHALMERS G R L,BUSTIN R M.Low Cretaceous gas shales in northeastern British Columbia,Part Ⅱ:evaluation of regional potential gas resource[J].Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology,2008,56(1):22-61.
[38] ROSS D J K,BUSTIN R M.The importance of shale composition and pore structure upon gas storage potential of shale gas reservoirs[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,2009,26(6):916-927.
[39] JARVIE D M.Shale resource systems for oil and gas:Part 2-Shale-oil resource systems[M]//BREYER J A.Shale Reservoirs-Giant Resources for the 21st Century. Tulsa:AAPG,2012:89-119.
[40] 薛海涛,田善思,卢双舫,等.页岩油资源定量评价中关键参数的选取与校正——以松辽盆地北部青山口组为例[J].矿物岩石地球化学通报,2015,34(1):70-78.
XUE Haitao,TIAN Shansi,LU Shuangfang,et al.Selection and verification of key parameters in the quantitative evaluation of shale oil:a case study at the Qingshankou Formation,Northern Songliao Basin[J].Bulletin of Mineralogy,Petrology and Geochemistry,2015,34(1):70-78.

断陷湖盆湖相页岩油形成有利条件及富集特征——以渤海湾盆地沧东凹陷孔店组二段为例

Favorable formation conditions and enrichment characteristics of lacustrine facies shale oil in faulted lake basin: a case study of Member 2 of Kongdian Formation in Cangdong sag,Bohai Bay Basin

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	付锁堂, 金之钧, 付金华, 李士祥, 杨伟伟. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组7段从致密油到页岩油认识的转变及勘探开发意义[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(5): 561-569.
[2]	张建国, 姜在兴, 刘立安, 袁方, 冯路尧, 李长昇. 渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷沙河街组三段下亚段细粒沉积岩岩相特征与沉积演化[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(3): 293-306.
[3]	赵贤正, 蒲秀刚, 周立宏, 金凤鸣, 韩国猛, 时战楠, 韩文中, 丁娱娇, 张伟, 王国娜, 刘学伟, 汪虎. 深盆湖相区页岩油富集理论、勘探技术及前景——以渤海湾盆地黄骅坳陷古近系为例[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(2): 143-162.
[4]	匡立春, 侯连华, 杨智, 吴松涛. 陆相页岩油储层评价关键参数及方法[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(1): 1-14.
[5]	张世铭, 王建功, 张永庶, 张小军, 张婷静, 崔俊. 柴达木盆地西部地区下干柴沟组湖相白云岩晶间孔型储层物性下限的确定[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(1): 45-55,118.
[6]	周立宏, 韩国猛, 马建英, 陈长伟, 杨飞, 张莉华, 周可佳, 陈双清, 杨帆, 董越崎, 周静. 歧口凹陷西南缘沙河街组一段下亚段古环境特征与沉积模式[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(8): 903-917.
[7]	陈治军, 张佳琪, 牛凌燕, 高怡文, 赵春晨, 王小多. 芳烃参数在湖相烃源岩成熟度评价中的适用性——以银根—额济纳旗盆地中生界烃源岩为例[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(8): 928-939.
[8]	王建功, 张永庶, 李翔, 徐丽, 石亚军, 黄叶秋, 王玉林, 管斌, 张世铭, 高妍芳. 柴达木盆地西部渐新统纹理石沉积特征与原位成藏[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(8): 940-959.
[9]	付锁堂, 付金华, 牛小兵, 李士祥, 吴志宇, 周新平, 刘江艳. 庆城油田成藏条件及勘探开发关键技术[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(7): 777-795.
[10]	赵贤正, 周立宏, 蒲秀刚, 时战楠, 韩国猛, 吴佳朋, 韩文中, 张伟, 高欢欢, 马建英, 汪虎. 歧口凹陷歧北次凹沙河街组三段页岩油地质特征与勘探突破[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(6): 643-657.
[11]	刘合, 匡立春, 李国欣, 王峰, 金旭, 陶嘉平, 孟思炜. 中国陆相页岩油完井方式优选的思考与建议[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(4): 489-496.
[12]	田继先, 李剑, 曾旭, 孔骅, 沙威, 郭泽清, 张静, 付艳双. 柴达木盆地东坪地区原油裂解气的发现及成藏模式[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(2): 154-162,255.
[13]	姜振学, 李廷微, 宫厚健, 姜涛, 常佳琦, 宁传祥, 苏思远, 陈委涛. 沾化凹陷低熟页岩储层特征及其对页岩油可动性的影响[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(12): 1587-1600.
[14]	李相方, 冯东, 张涛, 孙政, 何敏侠, 刘庆, 刘文远, 赵文, 李靖. 毛细管力在非常规油气藏开发中的作用及应用[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(12): 1719-1733.
[15]	袁晓冬, 姜在兴, 张元福, 姜洪福. 滦平盆地白垩系陆相页岩油储层特征[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(10): 1197-1208.