松辽盆地白垩系营城组火山机构储层定量分析

doi:10.7623/syxb200806010

石油学报 ›› 2008, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (6): 841-845.DOI: 10.7623/syxb200806010

松辽盆地白垩系营城组火山机构储层定量分析

唐华风¹, 庞彦明², 边伟华¹, 王璞珺¹, 闵飞琼¹, 丁日新²

1. 吉林大学地球科学学院吉林长春 130061;
2. 大庆油田勘探开发研究院黑龙江大庆 163712

收稿日期:2008-01-12 修回日期:2008-03-13 出版日期:2008-11-25 发布日期:2010-05-21
基金资助:
国家重点基础研究发展规划(973)项目(2006CB701403);国家自然科学基金项目(No.40372066)联合资助

Quantitative analysis on reservoirs in volcanic edifice of Early Cretaceous Yingcheng Formation in Songliao Basin

TANG Huafeng¹, PANG Yanming², BIAN Weihua¹, WANG Pujun¹, MIN Feiqiong¹, DING Rixin²

1. College of Earth Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun 130061, China;
2. Exploration and Development Research Institute, PetroChina Daqing Oilfield Company Limited, Daqing 163712, China

Received:2008-01-12 Revised:2008-03-13 Online:2008-11-25 Published:2010-05-21

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 根据火山岩形态和内部结构,将松辽盆地白垩系营城组火山机构划分为火山口—近火山口相带、近源相带和远源相带。基于304个钻井岩样的孔隙度、渗透率和压汞法毛细管压力曲线资料,对火山机构3个相带的储层特征分析结果表明,火山口—近火山口相带的储层具有大孔隙、宽长裂缝、孔喉半径大、孔喉分选好的特征,实测孔隙度为2%～25%,平均为7.74%,实测渗透率为(0.01～100)×10^-3μm²,平均为1.99×10^-3μm²,属于中孔高渗储层,局部为高孔高渗储层。近源相带的储层具有中等孔隙、窄小裂缝、孔喉半径较大、孔喉分选较好的特征,实测孔隙度为1%～15%,平均为7.47%,实测渗透率为(0.01～20)×10^-3μm²,平均为0.95×10^-3μm²,属于中孔中渗储层,局部为中孔高渗储层。远源相带的储层具有中小孔隙、宽长裂缝、孔喉半径小、孔喉分选差的特征,实测孔隙度为1%～10%,平均为6.95%,实测渗透率为(0.02～1)×10^-3μm²,平均为0.13×10^-3μm²,属于中低孔低渗储层。目前火山岩勘探的有利目标为火山口—近火山口相带。

关键词: 松辽盆地, 火山机构相带, 火山岩储层, 宏观特征, 微观结构

Abstract: According to occurrence, lithological association of volcanic rocks and volcanic facies composition in the Early Cretaceous Yingcheng Formation of Songliao Basin, the volcanic edifice was classified into three kinds of cracter-near cracter facies belt, proximal facies belt and distal facies belt. The reservoirs characteristics in each facies belt of volcanic edifice were analyzed using the parameters of porosity, permeability and mercury-injection capillary pressure curve from 304 drilling samples. The reservoir in the crater-near crater facies belt is characterized by big pore, wide and long fracture, big pore-throat radius and pore-throat well-sorted. The measured porosity ranges from 2% to 25%, and the average value is 7.74% . The range of permeability is from 0. 01×10^-3μm² to 100×10^-3μm², and the average value is 1. 99×10^-3μm². In the crater-near crater facies belts, most reservoir is charaterized by middle porosity and high permeability, the local parts are the reservoir with high porosity and high permeability. The reservoir in the proximity facies belt is of the properties of middle pore, narrow and small crack, middle pore-throat radius and pore-throat slightly well-sorted. The range of porosity is from 1% to 15%, and the average value is 7.47%. The range of permeability is from 0. 01×10^-3μm² to 20×10^-3μm², and the average value is 0.95×10^-3μm². The proximal facies belt mostly is the reservoir with middle porosity and permeability. Some part of the belt is the reservoir with middle porosity and high permeability. The distal facies belt is the reservoir with middle-small pore, wide and long crack, small pore-throat radius and pore-throat bad-sorted. The range of porosity is from 1% to 10%, and the average value is 6.95% . The range of permeability is from 0.02×10^-3μm² to 1.0×10^-3μm², and the average value is 0.13×10^-3μm². The distal facies belt is the reservoir with middle-small porosity and low permeability. The crater-near crater facies belt is the preferable target for volcanic reservoir exploration.

Key words: Songliao Basin, Facies belts of volcanic edifice, volcanic reservoirs, macroscopical characteristics, microstructure

中图分类号:

TE112.23

唐华风, 庞彦明, 边伟华, 王璞珺, 闵飞琼, 丁日新. 松辽盆地白垩系营城组火山机构储层定量分析[J]. 石油学报, 2008, 29(6): 841-845.

TANG Huafeng, PANG Yanming, BIAN Weihua, WANG Pujun, MIN Feiqiong, DING Rixin. Quantitative analysis on reservoirs in volcanic edifice of Early Cretaceous Yingcheng Formation in Songliao Basin[J]. Editorial office of ACTA PETROLEI SINICA, 2008, 29(6): 841-845.

[1]	邓铭哲, 方成名, 邓棚, 张永, 朱建峰. 松辽盆地南部梨树地区走滑-逆冲构造的成因——以小宽断裂带为例[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(9): 1089-1099.
[2]	唐华风, 王璞珺, 边伟华, 黄玉龙, 高有峰, 代晓娟. 火山岩储层地质研究回顾[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(12): 1744-1773.
[3]	孙立东, 陆加敏, 杨步增, 刘家军, 李晶, 张莹, 戴世立, 徐妍, 蔡东梅. 松辽盆地北部中央古隆起带天然气成藏条件与勘探方向[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(10): 1163-1173.
[4]	高凤琳, 宋岩, 梁志凯, 李卓, 原园, 张瀛涵, 陈磊, 郭望. 陆相页岩有机质孔隙发育特征及成因——以松辽盆地长岭断陷沙河子组页岩为例[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(9): 1030-1044.
[5]	郝国丽, 单玄龙, 李锋, 仝立华, 刘轶松, 王书琴, 张家强, 赵成弼. 松辽盆地西部斜坡油砂油地球化学及生物降解特征[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(3): 308-321.
[6]	孙立东, 印长海, 刘超, 曾花森, 张莹, 徐妍, 蔡东梅. 松辽盆地营城组优质烃源岩地质特征及勘探意义[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(10): 1172-1179.
[7]	贾虎, 陈昊, 陈波. 弹性液体胶塞修井防漏机理及应用[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(3): 349-356.
[8]	唐华风, 孔坦, 刘祥, 杨迪, 霍宏宇, 黄玉龙. 松辽盆地下白垩统沉火山碎屑岩优质储层特征和形成机理[J]. 石油学报, 2016, 37(5): 631-643.
[9]	熊健, 刘向君, 梁利喜. 甲烷在官能团化石墨中吸附的分子模拟[J]. 石油学报, 2016, 37(12): 1528-1536.
[10]	李磊, 许璐, 刘豪, 谭卓, 唐文. 末端分流河道-河口坝三维地震表征及演化——以松辽盆地古龙凹陷英79井区为例[J]. 石油学报, 2016, 37(11): 1394-1402.
[11]	程小伟, 刘开强, 李早元, 郭小阳. 油井水泥浆液-固态演变的结构与性能[J]. 石油学报, 2016, 37(10): 1287-1292.
[12]	王岩泉, 胡大千, 蔡国刚, 王璞珺, 于小健. 辽河盆地东部凹陷火山岩储层特征与主控因素[J]. 石油学报, 2013, 34(5): 896-904.
[13]	高有峰, 吴艳辉, 刘万洙, 瞿雪姣, 唐华风. 松辽盆地南部英台断陷营城组火山岩晶间微孔特征及储层效应[J]. 石油学报, 2013, 34(4): 667-674.
[14]	黄振凯　陈建平　王义军　薛海涛　邓春萍　王　民 . 松辽盆地白垩系青山口组泥岩微观孔隙特征[J]. 石油学报, 2013, 34(1): 30-36.
[15]	张　瑞　秦　妮　彭　林　胡冰艳　叶仲斌 . 注入速度对疏水缔合聚合物剪切后恢复性能的影响[J]. 石油学报, 2013, 34(1): 122-127.

松辽盆地白垩系营城组火山机构储层定量分析

Quantitative analysis on reservoirs in volcanic edifice of Early Cretaceous Yingcheng Formation in Songliao Basin

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价