西昆仑山前甫沙—克里阳地区新生代变形特征及油气控制作用

doi:10.7623/syxb201101012

石油学报 ›› 2011, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (1): 83-89.DOI: 10.7623/syxb201101012

西昆仑山前甫沙—克里阳地区新生代变形特征及油气控制作用

程晓敢 1,2 雷刚林 3 陈汉林 1,2 杜治利 3 廖林 1,2 罗俊成 3 师骏 3

1浙江大学地球科学系浙江杭州 310027； 2浙江大学教育部含油气盆地构造研究中心浙江杭州 310027； 3中国石油塔里木油田公司勘探开发研究院新疆库尔勒 841000

收稿日期:2010-06-28 修回日期:2010-09-07 出版日期:2011-01-25 发布日期:2011-03-23
通讯作者: 程晓敢
作者简介:程晓敢，男，1974年10月生，2006年获得浙江大学博士学位，现为浙江大学地球科学系副教授，主要从事造山带和盆地构造研究。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(No.40972138)和国家科技重大专项(2009ZX05009-001)联合资助。

Cenozoic structural deformation of the Fusha-Keliyang area in the piedmont of the western Kunlun Mountains and its control on hydrocarbon accumulation

CHENG Xiaogan 1,2 LEI Ganglin 3 CHEN Hanlin 1,2 DU Zhili 3 LIAO Lin 1,2 LUO Juncheng 3 SHI Jun 3

Received:2010-06-28 Revised:2010-09-07 Online:2011-01-25 Published:2011-03-23

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

甫沙—克里阳地区位于西昆仑山弧形构造带的东段,是研究西昆仑山前冲断带变形特征的关键区域。在详细地面地质调查和钻井分析的基础上，利用最近完成的高分辨率地震资料，对甫沙—克里阳地区的新生代构造变形特征进行了研究。认为研究区自南向北由甫沙、柯克亚和固满—合什塔格3排构造带组成，其中甫沙构造带的结构特征在横向上有较大差异；3排构造带变形时间由南向北变新，冲断带表现为“前展式”的变形，同一排构造带的变形存在着由西向东迁移的特征；研究区新生代总缩短量为54.5km，缩短率为35.9%；新生代构造变形对研究区的油气聚集具有重要的控制作用，甫沙构造带的深层构造是下一步最有利的勘探领域。

关键词: 西昆仑山前, 甫沙—克里阳地区, 新生代, 构造变形特征, 油气聚集

Abstract:

The Fushan-Keliyang area is situated in the eastern segment of the western Kunlun arc tectonic belt, providing key constraints for studying deformation characters of the western Kunlun piedmont thrust belt. Combined with geologic survey, drilling data and recent high-resolution seismic profiles, this study analyzed the Cenozoic deformation characters of the Fushan-Keliayang area. The present paper proposed that the studied area consisted of three ranges of structural belts from south to north, i.e. Fusha, Kekeya and Guman-Heshitag, of which the Fusha structural belt showed obviously lateral variations in configuration characters. Among these structural belts, the deformed timing of individual structural belts got younger northward, displaying characters of “break-forward” deformation. Within the each range of structural belts, deformation propagated from west to east. Based on the balanced section calculation, the total shortening of the Cenozoic structural belts in the Fusha-Keliyang area accounted for 54.5 km and the shortening rate was 35.9%. Therefore, the Cenozoic deformation greatly controlled hydrocarbon accumulation, and deep structures of the Fusha structural belts were considered to be the best target for hydrocarbon exploration.

Key words: piedmont of the western Kunlun Mountains, Fusha-Keliyang area, Cenozoic, characters of structural deformation, hydrocarbon accumulation

程晓敢雷刚林陈汉林杜治利廖林罗俊成师骏. 西昆仑山前甫沙—克里阳地区新生代变形特征及油气控制作用[J]. 石油学报, 2011, 32(1): 83-89.

CHENG Xiaogan LEI Ganglin CHEN Hanlin DU Zhili LIAO Lin LUO Juncheng. Cenozoic structural deformation of the Fusha-Keliyang area in the piedmont of the western Kunlun Mountains and its control on hydrocarbon accumulation[J]. Editorial office of ACTA PETROLEI SINICA, 2011, 32(1): 83-89.

参考文献

[1]Matte P,Tapponnier P,Arnaud N,et al.Tectonics of western Tibet,between the Tarim and the Indus[J].Earth and Planetary Science Letters,1996,142(3/4):311-330.

[2]Burtman V S.Cenozoic crustal shortening between the Pamir and TienShan and a reconstruction of the Pamir-TienShan transition zone for the Cretaceous and Palaeogene[J].Tectonophysics,2000,319(2):69-92.

[3]Edward Soel R,Trevor Dumitru A.Thrusting and exhumation around the margins of the western Tarim basin during the India-Asia collision[J].Journal of Geophysical Research,1997,102(B3):5043-5063.

[4]Jin Xiaochi,Wang Jun,Chen Bingwei,et al.Cenozoic depositional sequences in the piedmont of the west Kunlun and their paleogeographic and tectonic implications[J].Journal of Asian Earth Sciences,2003,21:755-765.

[5]郑洪波，Katherine Butcher,Chris Powell.新疆叶城晚新生代山前盆地演化与青藏高原北缘的隆升——I.地层学与岩石学证据[J].沉积学报，2002，20(2):274-281.

Zheng Hongbo,Butcher Katherine,Powell Chris.Evolution of Neogene foreland basin in Yecheng,Xinjiang,and uplift of northern Tibetan Plateau：I.stratigraphy and petrology[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2002,20(2):274-281.

[6]郑洪波,Katherine Butcher,Chris Powell.新疆叶城晚新生代山前盆地演化与青藏高原北缘的隆升——Ⅱ沉积相与沉积盆地演化[J]. 沉积学报,2002,21(1):46-51.

Zheng Hongbo,Butcher Katherine,Powell Chris.Evolution of Neogene foreland basin in Yecheng,Xinjiang,and uplift of northern Tibetan Plateau：II facies analysis[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2002,21(1):46-51.

[7]司家亮，李海兵，Laurie Barrier,等.青藏高原西北缘晚新生代的隆升特征——来自西昆仑山前盆地的沉积学证据[J].地质通报, 2007,26(10):1356-1367.

Si Jialiang,Li Haibing,Laurie Barrier,et al.Late Cenozoic uplift of the northwestern margin of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau:Sedimentary evidence from piedmont basins of the West Kunlun Mountains[J].Geological Bulletin of China,2007,26(10):1356-1367.

[8]康竹林，翟光明.中国的前陆盆地与油气聚集[J].石油学报，1995，16(4):1-8.

Kang Zhulin,Zhai Guangming.Foreland basins and their hydrocarbon potential in China[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,1995,16(4):1-8.

[9]肖安成，杨树峰，陈汉林，等.西昆仑山前冲断系的结构特征[J].地学前缘，2000，7(增刊):38-43.

Xiao Ancheng,Yang Shufeng,Chen Hanlin,et al.Structural characteristics of thrust system in the front of the west Kunlun Mountains[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2000,7(Supplement):38-43.

[10]伍秀芳，刘胜，汪新，等.帕米尔—西昆仑北麓新生代前陆褶皱冲断带构造剖面分析[J].地质科学，2004，39(2):260-271.

Wu Xiufang,Liu Sheng,Wang Xin,et al.Analysis on structural sections in the Cenozoic Pamir-Western Kunlun foreland fold-and-thrust belt[J].Chinese Journal of Geology,2004,39(2):260-271.

[11]胡建中，谭应佳，张平，等.塔里木盆地西南缘山前带逆冲推覆构造特征[J].地学前缘，2008，15(2):222-230.

Hu Jianzhong,Tan Yingjia,Zhang Ping,et al.Structural features of Cenozoic thrust-fault belts in the piedmont of Southwestern Tarim Basin[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2008,15(2):222-230.

[12]曲国胜，李亦纲，李岩峰，等.塔里木盆地西南前陆构造分段及其成因[J].中国科学:D辑，2005，35(3):193-202.

Qu Guosheng,Li Yigang,Li Yanfeng,et al.Tectonic segmentation and its origin of Southwestern Tarim Foreland Basin[J].Science in China:Series D,2005,35(3):193-202.

[13]刘胜，汪新，伍秀芳，等.塔西南山前晚新生代构造生长地层与变形时代[J].石油学报，2004，25(5):24-28.

Liu Sheng,Wang Xin,Wu Xiufang,et al.Growth strata and the deformation time of the late Cenozoic along front belts of Pamir-western Kunlun-southwest Tianshan in China[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2004,25(5):24-28.

[14]潘家伟，李海兵，Jerome Van Der Woerd，等.西昆仑山前冲断带晚新生代构造地貌特征[J].地质通报，2007，26(10):1368-1379.

Pan Jiawei,Li Haibing,Jerome Van Der Woerd,et al.Late Cenozoic morphotectonic features of the thrust belt in the front of the West Kunlun Mountains[J].Geological Bulletin of China,2007,26(10):1368-1379.

[15]贾承造.中国塔里木盆地构造特征与油气[M].北京:石油工业出版社，1997:238-242.

Jia Chengzao.Structural characteristics and petroleum accumulation of the Tarim Basin[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,1997:238-242.

[16]赵冬冬，陈汉林，杨树锋，等.西昆仑甜水海地区前陆褶皱冲断带的构造样式及其演化[J].地质学报，2000，74(2):134-141.

Zhao Dongdong,Chen Hanlin,Yang Shufeng,et al.Structural styles of the foreland fold and thrust belt in the Tianshuihai area,western Kunlun,and its tectonic evolution[J].Chinese Journal of Geology,2000,74(2):134-141.

[17]牟中海,唐勇,崔炳富,等.塔西南地区地层剥蚀厚度恢复研究[J].石油学报，2002,23(1):40-44.

Mou Zhonghai,Tang Yong,Cui Bingfu,et al.Erosion thickness restoration in southwest Tarim Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2002,23(1):40-44.

[18]何登发，李德生.塔里木盆地构造演化与油气聚集[M].北京:地质出版社，1996:55-56.

He Dengfa,Li Desheng.Tectonic proto-type and hydrocarbon accumulation in Tarim Basin[M].Beijing:Geological Publishing House,1996:55-56.

[19]贾承造，何登发，石昕，等.中国油气晚期成藏特征[J].中国科学:D辑,2006，36(5):412-420.

Jia Chengzao,He Dengfa,Shi Xin,et al.Characteristics of China’s oil and gas pool formation in latest geological history[J].Science in China:Series D,2006,36(5):412-420.

[20]宋岩，王喜双.新构造运动对天然气晚期成藏的控制作用[J].天然气地球科学，2003，14(2):103-106.

Song Yan,Wang Xishuang.The controlling action of modern structure movement on the late accumulation of natural Gas[J].Earth Science of Natural Gas,2003,14(2):103-106.

[21]何登发，陈红英，柳少波.柯克亚凝析油气田的成藏机理[J].石油勘探与开发，1997，24(4):28-32.

He Dengfa,Chen Hongying,Liu Shaobo.Pool-forming mechanism of Kekeya condensate oil and gas field[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,1997,24(4):28-32.

[22]张敏，黄光辉，赵红静，等.塔里木盆地柯克亚地区凝析油气藏成因特征研究[J].中国科学:D辑，2008，38(增刊Ⅱ):17-23.

Zhang Min,Huang Guanghui,Zhao Hongjing,et al.Study on origin of of Kekeya condensate oil and gas pool,Tarim Basin[J].Science in China:Series D,2008,38(Supplement II):17-23.

[23]李丹梅，汤达祯，刑卫新，等.塔西南前陆冲断带油气成藏地质条件的分段性[J].地学前缘，2008,15(2):178-185.

Li Danmei,Tang Dazhen,Xing Weixin,et al.Segmentation characteristics of geological conditions for reservoir forming in the foreland fold-thrust zone of the southwest Tarim Basin[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2008,15(2):178-185.

西昆仑山前甫沙—克里阳地区新生代变形特征及油气控制作用

Cenozoic structural deformation of the Fusha-Keliyang area in the piedmont of the western Kunlun Mountains and its control on hydrocarbon accumulation

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	蔡少武, 吕丁友, 贺电波, 张京思, 于娅. 渤海湾盆地秦南凹陷构造迁移特征及其对油气聚集的影响[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(S2): 67-78.
[2]	康琳, 吕丁友, 尚锁贵, 高京华, 张江涛. 辽东湾坳陷新生代构造变形特征及营潍断裂带的表现[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(S2): 79-90.
[3]	黄雷, 刘池洋. 张扭断裂带内复合花状构造的成因与意义[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(12): 1460-1469.
[4]	曹正林, 孙秀建, 吴武军, 田光荣, 张世铭, 李海滨, 孙知明, 徐丽, 王瑞菊. 柴达木盆地盆缘冲断古隆起的形成演化及对油气成藏的影响[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(9): 980-989.
[5]	王祥, 能源, 程晓敢, 王斌, 吕惠贤, 李向云, 屈洋, 付小涛. 塔里木盆地麦盖提斜坡及周缘下古生界断-盖组合及其控油气作用[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38(3): 267-273,323.
[6]	陈红汉, 米立军, 刘妍鷨, 韩晋阳, 孔令涛. 珠江口盆地深水区CO₂成因、分布规律与风险带预测[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38(2): 119-134.
[7]	陈东旭, 章凤奇, 陈汉林, 杨树锋, 曹婷, 蒙启安. 新生代辉绿岩岩体识别及油气地质意义——以中国东北地区方正断陷为例[J]. 石油学报, 2016, 37(6): 757-767.
[8]	王一博, 张功成, 赵志刚, 谢晓军, 刘世翔, 管红, 董伟, 宋双. 南海边缘海构造旋回对沉积充填的控制——以礼乐盆地新生代沉积为例[J]. 石油学报, 2016, 37(4): 474-482.
[9]	白冰, 王清斌, 赵国祥, 刘晓健. 蓬莱9-1构造新生代构造演化:磷灰石裂变径迹证据[J]. 石油学报, 2015, 36(9): 1098-1107.
[10]	张艺琼, 何登发, 童晓光. 中非剪切带含油气盆地成因机制与构造类型[J]. 石油学报, 2015, 36(10): 1234-1247.
[11]	岳军培, 张艳, 沈怀磊, 尤龙, 鲁宝亮, 王璞珺. 华南陆缘地质特征对南海北部盆地基底的约束[J]. 石油学报, 2013, 34(增刊二): 120-128.
[12]	杜治利　梁　瀚　师　骏　陈　才　王　宇 . 西昆仑山前柯东构造新生代构造变形及油气意义[J]. 石油学报, 2013, 34(1): 22-29.
[13]	唐　永　梅廉夫　肖安成　陈友智　罗开平 . 川东北宣汉-达县地区晚中生代-新生代构造应力场转化及其油气意义[J]. 石油学报, 2013, 34(1): 59-70.
[14]	邹才能　朱如凯　吴松涛　杨　智　陶士振　袁选俊　侯连华　杨　华　徐春春　李登华　白　斌　王　岚. 常规与非常规油气聚集类型、特征、机理及展望——以中国致密油和致密气为例[J]. 石油学报, 2012, 33(2): 173-187.
[15]	蒋有录卢浩刘华杨德相范炳达. 渤海湾盆地饶阳凹陷新近系油气富集特点与主控因素[J]. 石油学报, 2011, 32(5): 791-796.