石油学报 ›› 2011, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (2): 311-314.DOI: 10.7623/syxb201102019

• 油田开发 • 上一篇    下一篇

CO2在地层水中溶解对驱油过程的影响

汤  勇 1  杜志敏 1  孙  雷 1  刘  伟 2  陈祖华 2   

  1. 1西南石油大学油气藏地质及开发工程国家重点实验室  四川成都  610500; 2中国石油化工股份有限公司华东分公司  江苏南京  210011
  • 收稿日期:2010-06-09 修回日期:2010-09-14 出版日期:2011-03-25 发布日期:2011-05-25
  • 通讯作者: 汤 勇
  • 作者简介:汤 勇,男,1975年10月生,2004年获西南石油大学博士学位,现为西南石油大学石油工程学院副研究员,主要从事油气相态理论及测试、气田及凝析气田开发以及注气提高采收率研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家科技重大专项(2008ZX05016-001)和国家自然科学基金项目(No.50604011)联合资助。

Influence of CO2 dissolving in formation water on CO2 flooding process

TANG  Yong 1  DU Zhimin 1  SUN Lei 1  LIU Wei 2  CHEN Zuhua 2   

  • Received:2010-06-09 Revised:2010-09-14 Online:2011-03-25 Published:2011-05-25

摘要:

利用CO2-烃-地层水相平衡热力学模型模拟计算了CO2在地层水中的溶解规律。建立了考虑CO2在地层水中溶解的一维长岩心数值模拟模型,模拟计算了注CO2驱替过程中原油采出程度、气油比、油气水饱和度剖面、CO2在地层油和地层水中摩尔分数剖面的变化规律。研究表明:CO2在地层水中的溶解量随着压力的升高而增加,随着温度的升高而降低;当温度达到100℃以上或压力达到20 MPa以上时,压力和温度对CO2在水中溶解量影响变小。注气初期,考虑CO2溶解时采出程度比不考虑溶解时低,注气突破时间更迟,油墙向生产井端推进速度更慢。含水饱和度越高,影响程度越大。当含水饱和度为0.67、注入1.0倍烃孔隙体积CO2时,考虑CO2溶解采出程度比不考虑CO2溶解低约6%。CO2在地层水中溶解可导致CO2的损失,使得CO2驱油见效时间滞后。

关键词: 注气, 混相驱, CO2驱替, 地层水, 溶解模型

Abstract:

It was pursued to compare simulation results in which CO2 dissolution in the aqueous phase was either ignored or considered. The solubility law of CO2 in the aqueous phase was investigated by using a CO2-hydrocarbon-water equilibrium thermodynamic model. This compositional model combined with the Henry Law was then applied to a one-dimensional long-core simulator, in which a series of one-dimensional continuous CO2 flooding was simulated with or without CO2 dissolution in the aqueous phase at different initial water saturation. The difference caused by CO2 flooding was discussed in terms of variation laws for oil recovery, gas to oil ratio, oil-gas-water saturated profiles and CO2 mole fraction profiles in oils and formation water. The results showed that the amount of CO2 dissolving in formation water increased with the increase of pressure but decreased with increasing temperature. The effect of pressure or temperature on the CO2 dissolved amount in the aqueous phase became diminishing either as temperature rose to 100℃ or as pressure reached up to 20 MPa. During the early stage of gas injection, the oil recovery with the presence of CO2 dissolution was lower than that without the presence of CO2 dissolution, moreover, with the presence of CO2 dissolution the gas breakthrough time was later and oil banks toward to production wells were lagging behind, therefore, the higher the water saturation, the greater the effect of CO2 dissolution. When water saturation was 0.67 and the CO2 amount double of the hydrocarbon pore volume was injected, the ultimate oil recovery with the presence of CO2 dissolution was 6% less than that without the presence of CO2 dissolution. The effectiveness of CO2 flooding might be delayed due to the CO2 loss caused by CO2 dissolution in formation water.

Key words: gas injection, miscible flooding, CO2 flooding, formation water, dissolution model