基于漏失机理的碳酸盐岩地层漏失压力模型

doi:10.7623/syxb201105026

石油学报 ›› 2011, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (5): 900-904.DOI: 10.7623/syxb201105026

基于漏失机理的碳酸盐岩地层漏失压力模型

李大奇 1 康毅力 1 刘修善 2 曾义金 2 杜春朝 3

1西南石油大学油气藏地质及开发工程国家重点实验室四川成都 610500； 2中国石化石油工程技术研究院北京 100101；3中国石化西北油田分公司新疆乌鲁木齐 830013

收稿日期:2010-11-10 修回日期:2011-04-21 出版日期:2011-09-25 发布日期:2011-11-28
通讯作者: 李大奇
作者简介:李大奇，男，1982年9月生，2009年获西南石油大学油气井工程硕士学位，现为西南石油大学在读博士研究生，主要从事储层保护理论与技术、井壁稳定及防漏堵漏研究。
基金资助:
国家重点基础研究发展规划（973）项目(2010CB226705)和国家科技重大专项（2008ZX05049-003-07HZ和2008ZX05005-006-08HZ）联合资助。

The lost circulation pressure of carbonate formations on the basis of leakage mechanisms

LI Daqi 1 KANG Yili 1 LIU Xiushan 2 ZENG Yijin 2 DU Chunchao 3

Received:2010-11-10 Revised:2011-04-21 Online:2011-09-25 Published:2011-11-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

漏失压力预测是防漏堵漏的关键。在孔隙型或含微裂缝的砂、泥岩地层中，依据破裂压力设计钻井液安全密度上限值是比较合理的，然而在缝洞发育的碳酸盐岩地层中，往往使得钻井液设计密度值偏大。为了保障安全顺利钻井，亟需建立碳酸盐岩地层的漏失压力预测理论。基于对碳酸盐岩地层钻井液漏失机理的新认识，建立了压裂性漏失、裂缝扩展性漏失、大型裂缝溶洞性漏失的漏失压力模型。压裂性漏失主要抵抗地应力，漏失压力近似等于地层破裂压力；裂缝扩展性漏失需要抵抗地应力和地层压力，漏失压力一般小于地层破裂压力；大型裂缝溶洞性漏失只需抵抗地层压力，漏失压力一般略大于地层压力。实例分析表明，漏失压力模型科学依据更加充分，也更具针对性，预测结果与实际情况比较吻合，为合理的钻井液密度设计及防漏堵漏提供了依据。因此，建议将漏失压力纳入到钻井工程设计中。

关键词: 破裂压力, 防漏堵漏, 安全密度窗口, 储层损害, 碳酸盐岩

Abstract:

The prediction of lost circulation pressure is a key to leak resistance and sealing. It is reasonable for sandstone or mudstone formations with small pores or microcracks to design the upper safe density limit of drilling fluids based on fracture pressure，which, however, often results in a higher safe density value of drilling fluids for carbonate formations with developed fractures or caverns. Therefore, it is necessary to establish a theoretic foundation for the prediction of lost circulation pressure in order to guarantee safe drilling in carbonate formations. Based on the newly obtained cognition on lost circulation mechanisms of drilling liquids in carbonate formations, we established a lost circulation pressure model suitable to different leakage in carbonate formations, such as fracturing leakage，fracture expansion leakage and large-scale fracture or cavern leakage. The fracturing leakage deals mainly with in-situ stress for its lost circulation pressure is approximately equal to the fracture pressure of formations, the fracture expansion leakage is related with both in-situ stress and the formation pressure because the lost circulation pressure is commonly smaller than the fracture pressure of formations, while the large-scale fracture or cavern leakage is merely involved in the formation pressure for the lost circulation pressure is often slightly higher than the formation pressure. Case analyses have proved that this lost circulation pressure model is of sufficiency in scientific bases and pertinence. The prediction result derived from the model is relatively consistent with the actual situation and consequently provides a substantial basis for a rational design of the drilling fluid density as well as the leak resistance and sealing. Therefore, it is suggested that the design of drilling engineering should take the lost circulation pressure into consideration.

Key words: fracture pressure, leak resistance and sealing, safe density window, reservoir damage, carbonate

李大奇康毅力刘修善曾义金杜春朝. 基于漏失机理的碳酸盐岩地层漏失压力模型[J]. 石油学报, 2011, 32(5): 900-904.

LI Daqi KANG Yili LIU Xiushan ZENG Yijin DU Chunchao. The lost circulation pressure of carbonate formations on the basis of leakage mechanisms[J]. Editorial office of ACTA PETROLEI SINICA, 2011, 32(5): 900-904.

参考文献

[1]王业众，康毅力，游利军，等．裂缝性储层漏失机理及控制技术研究进展[J]．钻井液与完井液，2007，24（4）：74-77．

Wang Yezhong,Kang Yili,You Lijun,et al.Progresses in mechanism study and control:Mud losses to fractured reservoirs[J].Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid,2007,24(4):74-77.

[2]蔡利山，苏长明，刘金华．易漏失地层承压能力分析[J]．石油学报，2010，31（2）：311-317．

Cai Lishan,Su Changming,Liu Jinhua.Analysis on pressure-bearing capacity of leakage formation[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2010,31(2):311-317.

[3]Catalin I,James B,Ben B.Lost circulation can be managed better than ever[J].World Oil,2003,224(6):35-41.

[4]徐同台，刘玉杰，申威，等．钻井工程防漏堵漏技术[M]．北京：石油工业出版社，19971-4．

Xu Tongtai,Liu Yujie,Shen Wei,et al.Technology of lost circulation prevention and control during drilling engineering[M].Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press,1997:1-4.

[5]鄢捷年．钻井液工艺学[M]．东营：石油大学出版社，2001：350-351．

Yan Jienian.Drilling fluid technology[M].Dongying:The Press of the University of Petroleum,China,2001:350-351.

[6]胥永杰．高陡复杂构造地应力提取方法与井漏机理研究[D]．成都：西南石油学院，2005．

Xu Yongjie.Study on the formation stress calculation method and well leak mechanism of aloft-steep and complex structure[D].Chengdu:Southwest Petroleum Institute,2005.

[7]金衍，陈勉，刘晓明，等．塔中奥陶系碳酸盐岩地层漏失压力统计分析[J]．石油钻采工艺，2007，29（5）：82-84．

Jin Yan,Chen Mian,Liu Xiaoming,et al.Statistic analysis of leakage pressure of ordovician carbonate formation in middle Tarim Basin[J].Oil Drilling & Production Technology,2007,29(5):82-84.

[8]石晓兵，熊继有，陈平，等．高陡复杂构造裂缝漏失堵漏机理研究[J]．钻采工艺，2007，30（5）：24-26．

Shi Xiaobing,Xiong Jiyou,Chen Ping,et al.Study on the lost circulation and sealing mechanism in complex high dip chack formation[J].Drilling & Production Technology,2007,30(5):24-26.

[9]Morita N,Black A D,Fuh G F.Theory of lost circulation pressure[R].SPE 20409,1990.

[10]朱亮，张春阳，楼一珊，等．两种漏失压力计算模型的比较分析[J]．天然气工业，2008，28（12）：60-61，67．

Zhu Liang,Zhang Chunyang,Lou Yishan,et al.Comparative analysis between the mechanics-based and statistics-bused calculation models for leakage pressure[J].Natural Gas Industry,2008,28(12):60-61,67.

[11]李传亮，孔祥言．油井压裂过程中岩石破裂压力计算公式的理论研究[J]．石油钻采工艺，2000，22（2）：54-56．

Li Chuanliang,Kong Xiangyan.A theoretical study on rock breakdown pressure calculation equations of fracturing process[J].Oil Drilling & Production Technology,2000,22(2):54-56.

[12]金衍，张旭东，陈勉．天然裂缝地层中垂直井水力裂缝起裂压力模型研究[J]．石油学报，2005，26（6）:113-114,118．

Jin Yan,Zhang Xudong,Chen Mian.Initiation pressure models for hydraulic fracturing of vertical wells in naturally fractured formation[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2005,26(6):113-114,118.

[13]邓金根，刘杨，蔚宝华，等．高温高压地层破裂压力预测方法[J]．石油钻采工艺，2009,37（5）：43-46.

Deng Jingen,Liu Yang,Wei Baohua,et al.Formation fracture pressure prediction method in high temperature and high pressure formations[J].Petroleum Drilling Techniques,2009,37(5):43-46.

[14]郑有成．川东北部飞仙关组探井地层压力测井预测方法与工程应用研究[D]．成都：西南石油学院，2004．

Zheng Youcheng.Prediction method and engineering application research on logging formation pressure in Feixianguan formation exploration well of northeast Sichuan[D].Chengdu:Southwest Petroleum Institute,2004.

[15]Aadnoy B S,Belayneh M,Arriado M,et al.Design of well barriers to combat circulation losses[R].SPE 105449,2007.

[16]Lorenz J C.Stress-sensitive reservoirs[J].Journal of Petroleum Technology,1999,51(1):61-63.

[17]闫丰明，康毅力，李松，等．裂缝—孔洞型碳酸盐岩储层应力敏感性实验研究[J]．天然气地球科学，2010，21（3）：489-493.

Yan Fengming,Kang Yili,Li Song,et al.Simulated experiment on stress sensitivity in fractured-vuggy reservoir[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2010,21(3):489-493.

基于漏失机理的碳酸盐岩地层漏失压力模型

The lost circulation pressure of carbonate formations on the basis of leakage mechanisms

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	刘鹏, 王永诗, 宋明水, 刘雅利, 王敏, 张顺, 王彤达. 碳酸盐岩断裂带断层岩特征及演化——以渤海湾盆地济阳坳陷车镇凹陷下古生界为例[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(5): 588-597.
[2]	张友, 李强, 郑兴平, 厉玉乐, 沈安江, 朱茂, 熊冉, 朱可丹, 王显东, 齐井顺, 张君龙, 邵冠铭, 佘敏, 宋叙, 孙海航. 塔里木盆地东部古城—肖塘地区寒武纪—奥陶纪台地类型、演化过程及有利储集相带[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(4): 447-465.
[3]	张世铭, 王建功, 张永庶, 张小军, 张婷静, 崔俊. 柴达木盆地西部地区下干柴沟组湖相白云岩晶间孔型储层物性下限的确定[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(1): 45-55,118.
[4]	吴小奇, 陈迎宾, 翟常博, 王彦青, 曾华盛, 刘文汇, 杨俊, 倪春华, 周凌方, 宋晓波. 川西坳陷中三叠统雷口坡组天然气气源对比[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(8): 918-927,1018.
[5]	王建功, 张永庶, 李翔, 徐丽, 石亚军, 黄叶秋, 王玉林, 管斌, 张世铭, 高妍芳. 柴达木盆地西部渐新统纹理石沉积特征与原位成藏[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(8): 940-959.
[6]	刘宝增, 漆立新, 李宗杰, 刘军, 黄超, 杨林, 马灵伟, 龚伟. 顺北地区超深层断溶体储层空间雕刻及量化描述技术[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(4): 412-420.
[7]	程洪, 汪彦, 鲁新便. 塔河地区深层碳酸盐岩断溶体圈闭类型及特征[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(3): 301-309.
[8]	齐宁, 陈国彬, 李振亮, 梁冲, 何龙. 基于分步算法的裂缝性碳酸盐岩油藏大尺度酸化数值模拟[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(3): 348-362,371.
[9]	王宜林, 宋新民, 王贵海, 汪华, 李兆明, 张红, 聂臻. 中东地区油气合作区快速规模上产关键技术与实践[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(12): 1633-1642.
[10]	孙金声, 赵震, 白英睿, 吕开河, 王金堂, 王韧, 王晨烨, 戴立瑶. 智能自愈合凝胶研究进展及在钻井液领域的应用前景[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(12): 1706-1718.
[11]	郭建春, 任冀川, 王世彬, 苟波, 赵俊生, 伍林. 裂缝性致密碳酸盐岩储层酸压多场耦合数值模拟与应用[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(10): 1219-1228.
[12]	暴丹, 邱正松, 叶链, 钟汉毅, 赵欣, 邱维清, 王宝田, 郭保雨. 热致形状记忆“智能”型堵漏剂的制备与特性实验[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(1): 106-115.
[13]	赵少伟, 马英文, 刘飞航, 李海涛, 张建丰. 基于线性强化弹塑性疏松砂岩破裂模式[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(S2): 131-140.
[14]	刘航宇, 田中元, 刘波, 郭睿, 石开波, 叶玉峰. 中东地区巨厚强非均质碳酸盐岩储层分类与预测——以伊拉克W油田中白垩统Mishrif组为例[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(6): 677-691.
[15]	郭荣涛, 马达德, 张永庶, 刘波, 陈晓冬, 崔俊, 王鹏, 张庆辉, 姜营海, 李亚锋. 柴达木盆地英西地区下干柴沟组上段超压孔缝型储层特征及形成机理[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(4): 411-422.