深水钻井隔水管-导管系统波激疲劳分析

doi:10.7623/syxb201305020

石油学报 ›› 2013, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (5): 977-982.DOI: 10.7623/syxb201305020

深水钻井隔水管-导管系统波激疲劳分析

刘秀全¹, 陈国明¹, 畅元江¹, 许亮斌²

1. 中国石油大学海洋油气装备与安全技术研究中心山东青岛 266580;
2. 中海油研究总院北京 100027

收稿日期:2013-02-11 修回日期:2013-04-07 出版日期:2013-09-25 发布日期:2013-08-01
通讯作者: 陈国明,男,1962年10月生,1982年毕业于华东石油学院,现为中国石油大学(华东)教授、博士生导师,主要从事海洋油气工程及装备、油气安全工程方面的研究。Email:offshore@126.com
作者简介:刘秀全,男,1987年2月生,2009年毕业于中国石油大学(华东),现为中国石油大学(华东)博士研究生,主要从事深水钻井隔水管完整性技术研究。Email:lxqmcae@163.com
基金资助:
国家重大科技专项(2011ZX05026-001-05);长江学者和创新团队发展计划(IRT1086)和中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(12CX06065A,11CX05009A)资助。

Wave induced fatigue analysis on deepwater drilling riser-conductor system

LIU Xiuquan¹, CHEN Guoming¹, CHANG Yuanjiang¹, XU Liangbin²

1. Centre for Offshore Engineering and Safety Technology, China University of Petroleum, Qingdao 266580, China;
2. CNOOC Research Institute, Beijing 100027, China

Received:2013-02-11 Revised:2013-04-07 Online:2013-09-25 Published:2013-08-01

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

波激疲劳是深水钻井隔水管-导管系统最主要的失效模式之一。综合考虑波浪载荷、钻井平台运动和土壤抗力建立了深水钻井隔水管-导管耦合系统波激疲劳分析方法,实例分析了中国南海某井深水钻井隔水管-导管系统波激疲劳寿命,识别出了系统波激疲劳关键部位,并与隔水管常规分析模型的计算结果进行了对比。在此基础上,研究了钻井平台运动幅值、顶张力、下挠性接头转动刚度和井口出泥高度对系统波激疲劳特性的影响。结果表明,常规分析模型将隔水管底部看作固定端导致隔水管波激疲劳损伤过大,而本文提出的隔水管-导管系统分析模型能较好地模拟隔水管实际受力情况;隔水管最大波激疲劳损伤出现在下挠性接头处,导管的最大波激疲劳损伤出现在泥线附近;导管是整个系统中波激疲劳性能最薄弱的环节,适当地减小钻井平台运动幅值、隔水管顶张力、下挠性接头转动刚度和井口出泥高度均能改善导管波激疲劳性能。

关键词: 深水, 钻井隔水管, 导管, 动态分析, 波激疲劳

Abstract:

Wave induced fatigue is one of the main failure modes of a deepwater drilling riser-conductor system. In the present paper, a method for calculating wave induced fatigue of the deepwater drilling riser-conductor system was established by comprehensively taking wave load, drilling platform motion and soil resistance into consideration. Wave induced fatigue of the riser-conductor system from a well in the South China Sea was analyzed and key fatigue points of the riser-conductor system were identified, finally the computation result was compared with that calculated by the conventional riser analysis model. On the basis of these results, influences of drilling platform motion amplitude, top tension, rotational stiffness of the lower flex joint and the wellhead mud-line height on the system fatigue were examined. The results showed that the conventional analysis model takes the bottom of a riser as a fixed end, resulting in a too big wave induced fatigue damage of the riser. The riser-conductor analysis model proposed in this paper can simulate the actual load condition of a riser better. The maximum wave induced fatigue damage of a riser lies at the lower flex joint, while that of a conductor occurs around mud-line. The conductor is the weakest point of the wave induced fatigue performance in the whole system. An appropriate decrease in drilling platform motion amplitude, top tension of a riser, rotational stiffness of the lower flex joint and the wellhead mud-line height can all improve the wave induced fatigue performance of a conductor.

Key words: deepwater, drilling riser, conductor, dynamic analysis, wave induced fatigue

中图分类号:

TE52

刘秀全, 陈国明, 畅元江, 许亮斌. 深水钻井隔水管-导管系统波激疲劳分析[J]. 石油学报, 2013, 34(5): 977-982.

LIU Xiuquan, CHEN Guoming, CHANG Yuanjiang, XU Liangbin. Wave induced fatigue analysis on deepwater drilling riser-conductor system[J]. Editorial office of ACTA PETROLEI SINICA, 2013, 34(5): 977-982.

参考文献

[1] American Petroleum Institute.API RP 16Q-1993 Recommended practice for design,selection,operation and maintenance of marine drilling riser systems[S].Washington:American Petroleum Institute,1993.
[2] International Organization for Standardization.ISO 13624-1-2009 Petroleum and natural gas industries—Drilling and production equipment—Part 1:design and operation of marine drilling riser equipment[S].Geneva:International Organization for Standardization,2009.
[3] Hull M E,Rees J C,Deegan F J,et al.Risk-based case study of floating facility drilling riser design concepts in deepwater Gulf of Mexico:proceedings of the 2011 Offshore Technology Conference,Houston,May 2-5,2011[C].Houston:OTC,2011.
[4] Shen C L,Natarajan S.Conductor system fatigue excitation and mitigation:proceedings of the 20th International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference,Beijing,June 20-25,2010[C].Cupertino:ISOPE,2010.
[5] 孙友义,鞠少栋,蒋世全,等.超深水钻井隔水管-井口系统涡激振动疲劳分析[J].石油学报,2011,32(6):1050-1054.
Sun Youyi,Ju Shaodong,Jiang Shiquan,et al.Fatigue analysis of the vortex-induced vibration in a drilling riser-wellhead system in ultra deepwater[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2011,32(6):1050-1054.
[6] 畅元江,陈国明,刘健.深水钻井隔水管的波致长期疲劳[J].机械强度,2009,31(5):797-802.
Chang Yuanjiang,Chen Guoming,Liu Jian.Long-term wave fatigue analysis of deepwater drilling riser[J].Journal of Mechanical Strength,2009,31(5):797-802.
[7] 孙友义,陈国明.超深水钻井系统隔水管波致疲劳研究[J].石油学报,2009,30(3):460-464.
Sun Youyi,Chen Guoming.Research on wave-loading fatigue of drilling riser in ultra-deep water drilling[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2009,30(3):460-464.
[8] 刘秀全,陈国明,畅元江,等.深水钻井隔水管时域随机波激疲劳分析[J].中国石油大学学报:自然科学版,2012,36(2):146-151.
Liu Xiuquan,Chen Guoming,Chang Yuanjiang,et al.Time domain random wave-loading fatigue analysis on deepwater drilling risers[J].Journal of China University of Petroleum:Edition of Natural Science,2012,36(2):146-151.
[9] Khan R A,Ahmad S.Dynamic response and fatigue reliability analysis of marine riser under random loads:proceedings of 26th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering,San Diego,June 10-15,2007[C].Houston:OMAE,2007.
[10] Steinkjer O,Sodahl N,Grytoyr G.Method for time domain fatigue life assessment of risers and umbilicals:proceedings of 29th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering,Shanghai,June 6-11,2010[C].Houston:OMAE,2010.
[11] 李华桂.海洋钻井隔水管的动力分析[J].石油学报,1996,17(1):122-127.
Li Huagui.Dynamic analysis of offshore drilling riser[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,1996,17(1):122-127.
[12] American Petroleum Institute.API RP 2A-WSD-2000 Recommended practice for planning,design and constructing fixed offshore platforms:working stress design[S].Washington:American Petroleum Institute,2000.
[13] American Society for Testing and Materials.ASTM E1049-85-2005 Standard practices for cycle counting in fatigue analysis[S].West Conshohocken:American Society for Testing and Materials,2005.
[14] 刘健,陈国明,黄东升.冰区海洋平台疲劳可靠性评估方法的研究[J].石油学报,2006,27(5):115-123.
Liu Jian,Chen Guoming,Huang Dongsheng.Evaluation method for fatigue reliability of offshore platform in ice region[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2006,27(5):115-123.
[15] 许亮斌,陈国明.考虑疲劳失效的海洋平台动态可靠性分析[J].石油学报,2007,28(3):131-134.
Xu Liangbin,Chen Guoming.Dynamic reliability analysis of offshore platform considering fatigue failure[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2007,28(3):131-134.
[16] 鞠少栋,畅元江,陈国明,等.超深水钻井作业隔水管顶张力确定方法[J].海洋工程,2011,29(1):100-104.
Ju Shaodong,Chang Yuanjiang,Chen Guoming,et al.Determination methods for the top tension of ultradeepwater drilling risers[J].The Ocean Engineering,2011,29(1):100-104.
[17] Chang Yuanjiang,Chen Guoming,Sun Youyi,et al.Nonlinear dynamic analysis of deepwater drilling risers subjected to random loads[J].China Ocean Engineering,2008,22(4):683-691.
[18] Det Norske Veritas.DNV-RP-C203-2001 Fatigue strength analysis of offshore steel structures[S].Oslo:Det Norske Veritas,2001.

深水钻井隔水管-导管系统波激疲劳分析

Wave induced fatigue analysis on deepwater drilling riser-conductor system

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张家强, 李士祥, 李宏伟, 周新平, 刘江艳, 郭睿良, 陈俊霖, 李树同. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组7油层组湖盆远端重力流沉积与深水油气勘探——以城页水平井区长7₃小层为例[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(5): 570-587.
[2]	徐立涛, 何玉林, 石万忠, 梁金强, 王任, 杜浩, 张伟, 李冠华. 琼东南盆地深水区天然气水合物成藏主控因素及模式[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(5): 598-610.
[3]	糜利栋. 基于产气剖面的页岩气离散裂缝网络反演方法[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(4): 481-491.
[4]	杨希冰, 周杰, 杨金海, 何小胡, 吴昊, 甘军, 游君君. 琼东南盆地深水区东区中生界潜山天然气来源及成藏模式[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(3): 283-292.
[5]	邵珠福, 张文鑫, 毛毳, 栾锡武, 钟建华, John Howell, 刘泽璇, 赵冰, 冉伟民, 刘晶晶. 砂岩侵入体及其油气地质意义[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(3): 378-398.
[6]	王黎松, 高宝奎, 胡天祥, 马超, 王捷力. 考虑材料非线性的环空增压预测模型[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(2): 235-243.
[7]	王宴滨, 高德利. 基于多自由度系统的深水钻井隔水管紧急解脱反冲响应[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(10): 1259-1265.
[8]	高德利, 王宴滨. 海洋深水钻井力学与控制技术若干研究进展[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(S2): 102-115.
[9]	杨进, 黄鑫, 杨宇翔, 胡志强, 宋宇, 刘和兴, 徐东升, 蔡饶, 李磊. 深水油气井新型膨胀导管力学特性[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(S2): 116-122.
[10]	刘书杰, 谢仁军, 仝刚, 吴怡, 徐国贤. 中国海洋石油集团有限公司深水钻完井技术进展及展望[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(S2): 168-173.
[11]	张忠涛, 张向涛, 孙辉, 石宁, 张博, 冯轩. 珠江口盆地渐新世陆架边缘三角洲沉积特征及其对成藏的控制作用[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(s1): 81-89.
[12]	罗静兰, 何敏, 庞雄, 李弛, 柳保军, 雷川, 马永坤, 庞江. 珠江口盆地南部热演化事件与高地温梯度的成岩响应及其对油气勘探的启示[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(s1): 90-104.
[13]	王家豪, 彭光荣, 柳保军, 郑金云, 杨飞. 碎屑岩成岩拉平处理及沉积作用控制储层物性的定量表征——以珠江口盆地白云凹陷为例[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(s1): 115-123.
[14]	柳保军, 庞雄, 王家豪, 任建业, 刘军, 郑金云, 向绪洪, 蔡国富, 吴宇翔. 珠江口盆地深水区伸展陆缘地壳减薄背景下的沉积体系响应过程及油气勘探意义[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(s1): 124-138.
[15]	高永海, 孟文波, 崔燕春, 张崇, 陈野, 董钊, 孙金声, 孙宝江. 深水气井水合物沉积预测新模型[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(8): 975-982.