构造活动强度划分断陷盆地构造区划——以饶阳凹陷为例

doi:10.7623/syxb201402009

石油学报 ›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (2): 294-302,384.DOI: 10.7623/syxb201402009

构造活动强度划分断陷盆地构造区划——以饶阳凹陷为例

邹娟, 戴俊生, 张丹丹, 伍亚, 张艺, 田博

中国石油大学地球科学与技术学院山东青岛 266580

收稿日期:2013-07-31 修回日期:2013-10-15 出版日期:2014-03-25 发布日期:2014-04-11
通讯作者: 邹娟，女，1987年2月生，2010年毕业于中国石油大学（华东），现为中国石油大学（华东）地球科学与技术学院博士研究生，主要从事油气区构造解析、构造应力场研究。Email：zoujuan2012@yeah.net
作者简介:邹娟，女，1987年2月生，2010年毕业于中国石油大学（华东），现为中国石油大学（华东）地球科学与技术学院博士研究生，主要从事油气区构造解析、构造应力场研究。Email：zoujuan2012@yeah.net
基金资助:
国家重大科技专项（2011ZX05011-001）和中国石油华北油田公司科技项目（HBYT-WTY-2011-JS-303）资助。

Structural divisions of rift basin based on the intensity of tectonic activity：a case study from the Raoyang sag

Zou Juan, Dai Junsheng, Zhang Dandan, Wu Ya, Zhang Yi, Tian Bo

School of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum, Qingdao 266580, China

Received:2013-07-31 Revised:2013-10-15 Online:2014-03-25 Published:2014-04-11

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为了直观、准确、定量地描述断陷盆地各个时期的构造活动强度，选取了底面曲率、地层厚度变化率导数、断层密度、断层落差面密度和不整合面剥蚀率5个表征参数，并将其对构造活动强度的显示结果叠加，从而提出了以构造活动强度为依据的构造区划。以饶阳凹陷为例，确定了构造活动强度定量划分标准：将饶阳凹陷整体划分为5个强构造活动区、3个中构造活动区和3个弱构造活动区，发现斜坡基本为弱构造活动区，背斜构造带为强构造活动区，断裂构造带为强构造活动区或中构造活动区，洼槽多为弱构造活动区；通过对各个时期进行构造活动强度区划，总结出弱—中—弱、弱—强—弱、中—弱、强—中—弱、强—弱及持续弱6种演化模式，同时结合研究区实例发现，先变强后变弱构造区发育古近系油气藏，变弱构造区发育潜山油气藏、古近系油气藏，持续弱构造区油气藏较为少见。

关键词: 构造活动强度, 表征参数, 量化标准, 强度分区, 演化模式, 饶阳凹陷

Abstract:

This study is focused on the structural division of rift basin based on the intensity of tectonic activity. Intuitive, accurate, and quantitative description of the intensity of tectonic activity at different stages are achieved by superimposing indications of five characterization parameters, including bottom curvature, derivative of stratigraphic thickness changing rate, fault density, throw density, and erosion rate of the unconformity. The criteria for quantitative division of the intensity of tectonic activity are applied in the Raoyang sag, Jizhong depression. The Raoyang sag is divided into eleven tectonically active regions, with five intensive tectonic activity regions, three moderate tectonic activity regions, and three weak tectonic activity regions. Slopes are generally as weak tectonic activity region; anticline zones are intensive tectonic activity region; fault zones are intensive or moderate tectonic activity region; and sub-sags mainly are weak tectonic activity region. Six evolutionary models are summarized based on division of the intensity of tectonic activity in different stages, i.e., weak-moderate-weak, weak-intensive-weak, medium-weak, intensive-moderate-weak, intensive-weak, and continuously weak. Taking into account the field data, it is concluded that Paleogene oil and gas reservoirs are developed in tectonic zones with weak-intensive/moderate-weak tectonic activity, whereas buried-hill and Paleogene reservoirs are developed in tectonic zones with weakening tectonic activity; oil and gas reservoirs are rarely developed in tectonic zones with continuously weak tectonic activity in Raoyang sag.

Key words: intensity of tectonic activity, characterization parameters, quantitative criteria, partition of strength, evolutionary model, Raoyang sag

中图分类号:

TE121

邹娟, 戴俊生, 张丹丹, 伍亚, 张艺, 田博. 构造活动强度划分断陷盆地构造区划——以饶阳凹陷为例[J]. 石油学报, 2014, 35(2): 294-302,384.

Zou Juan, Dai Junsheng, Zhang Dandan, Wu Ya, Zhang Yi, Tian Bo. Structural divisions of rift basin based on the intensity of tectonic activity：a case study from the Raoyang sag[J]. ACTA PETROLEI SINICA, 2014, 35(2): 294-302,384.

参考文献

[1] Cпижарский T H.构造区划原则[J].李树菁, 译.地震地质译丛, 1982, 4(4):12-14.
Cпижарский T H.Principle of structural divisions[J].Translated by Li Shujing.Earthquake Geology Renditions, 1982, 4(4):12-14.
[2] Βархатов Β Π.构造区划的原则和构造图的类型[J].李志义, 译.地震地质译丛, 1982, 4(4):53-56.
Βархатов Β Π.Principle of structural divisions and type of structural map[J].Translated by Li Zhiyi.Earthquake Geology Renditions, 1982, 4(4):53-56.
[3] 蒋有录, 查明.石油天然气地质与勘探[M].北京:石油工业出版社, 2006:43-245.
Jiang Youlu, Zha Ming.Petroleum geology & exploration[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 2006:43-245.
[4] 李建忠, 杨涛, 王立武, 等.松辽南部大情字井地区断裂构造特征及其控油作用[J].石油勘探与开发, 2004, 31(1):18-20.
Li Jianzhong, Yang Tao, Wang Liwu, et al.The fault structure and its controlling role to hydrocarbon accumulation in Daqingzijing area, southern Songliao Basin[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2004, 31(1):18-20.
[5] 罗群."断裂控烃理论"概要[J].勘探家, 1999, 4(3):8-14.
Luo Qun.An outline of theory of fracture-controlling hydrocarbon[J].Petroleum Explorationist, 1999, 4(3):8-14.
[6] 孙景耀, 刘松, 王世民, 等.构造活动对莱州湾凹陷油气成藏的影响[J].中国海上油气, 2006, 18(5):299-303.
Sun Jingyao, Liu Song, Wang Shimin, et al.Tectonic impacts on hydrocarbon accumulation in Laizhouwan sag[J].China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2006, 18(5):299-303.
[7] 康德江, 马行陟.中国西部叠合盆地构造强度定量表征及其应用[J].石油学报, 2009, 30(5):642-647.
Kang Dejiang, Ma Xingzhi.Tectonic intensity quantification method and its application to the superimposed basins in west China[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2009, 30(5):642-647.
[8] 申建, 傅雪海, 秦勇, 等.构造运动强度量化表征及其对潘一矿煤与瓦斯突出控制[J].煤矿安全, 2010(10):93-95.
Shen Jian, Fu Xuehai, Qin Yong, et al.Quantitative characterization of tectonic movement density and its outburst control of Panyi coal and gas[J].Coal Mine Safety, 2010(10):93-95.
[9] 关连绪.浅谈构造强度控矿[J].黄金地质, 2002, 8(4):1-7.
Guan Lianxu.Discussion on ore control of tectonic strength[J].Gold Geology, 2002, 8(4):1-7.
[10] 夏玉成, 樊怀仁.矿井构造定量评价的原则和方法[J].西安矿业学院学报, 1998, 18(4):323-327.
Xia Yucheng, Fan Huairen.The principles and methods of quantitative assessment of mine structure[J].Journal of Xi'an Mining Institute, 1998, 18(4):323-327.
[11] 徐凤银, 龙荣生, 夏玉成, 等.矿井地质构造定量评价及其预测[J].煤炭学报, 1991, 16(4):85-93.
Xu Fengyin, Long Rongsheng, Xia Yucheng, et al.Quantitative assessment and prediction of geological structures in coal mine[J].Journal of China Coal Society, 1991, 16(4):85-93.
[12] 曾勇, 阎小卫.煤层构造变形的综合定量分析[J].煤田地质与勘探, 2000, 28(6):13-16.
Zeng Yong, Yan Xiaowei.Comprehensive and quantitative analysis on tectonic deformation of coal-bed[J].Coal Geology and Exploration, 2000, 28(6):13-16.
[13] 王雷, 陈海清, 陈国文, 等.应用曲率属性预测裂缝发育带及其产状[J].石油地球物理勘探, 2010, 45(6):885-889.
Wang Lei, Chen Haiqing, Chen Guowen, et al.Application of curvature attributes in predicting fracture-developed zone and its orientation[J].Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2010, 45(6):885-889.
[14] Roberts A.Curvature attributes and their application to 3D interpreted horizons[J].First Break, 2001, 19(2):85-100.
[15] Peet F G, Sahota T S.Surface curvature as a measure of image texture[J].IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 1985, 7(6):734-738.
[16] 王世彬, 郭厚亮.煤层厚度变化的地质成因分析[J].煤炭技术, 2005, 24(6):6-7.
Wang Shibin, Guo Houliang.Analysis on the coal seam thickness change and geological formation[J].Coal Technology, 2005, 24(6):6-7.
[17] 王辉, 康高峰, 仙麦龙, 等.陕西澄合矿区中深部4号煤层厚度变化原因[J].煤田地质与勘探, 2012, 40(5):16-20.
Wang Hui, Kang Gaofeng, Xian Mailong, et al.The reasons for thickness changes of seam No.4 at medium depth in Chenghe mining area[J].Coal Geology & Exploration, 2012, 40(5):16-20.
[18] 刘程, 李向东, 杨守国.地质构造对煤层厚度的影响研究[J].煤矿安全, 2008, 39(5):14-16.
Liu Cheng, Li Xiangdong, Yang Shouguo.Study on influence of geologic structure on coal seam thickness[J].Safety in Coal Mines, 2008, 39(5):14-16.
[19] 戴俊生.构造地质学教程(附本)[M].东营:中国石油大学出版社, 1996:40-41.
Dai Junsheng.Structural geology and tectonics (Addendum)[M].Dongying:China University of Petroleum Press, 1996:40-41.
[20] 马贺平, 马君龙.煤层底板构造复杂程度定量评价[J].中国煤田地质, 1998, 10(增刊1):58-59.
Ma Heping, Ma Junlong.Quantitative evaluation of structural complexity of seam floor[J].Coal Geology of China, 1998, 10(Supplement 1):58-59.
[21] 周云霞, 曹代勇.矿井地质构造定量评价模型探讨[J].煤田地质与勘探, 2001, 29(2):16-19.
Zhou Yunxia, Cao Daiyong.Quantitative evaluation model of mine geological structure[J].Coal Geology & Exploration, 2001, 29(2):16-19.
[22] Thorsen C E.Age of growth faulting in Southeast Louisiana[J].Transactions, Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies, 1963, 13:103-110.
[23] 赵勇, 戴俊生.应用落差分析研究生长断层[J].石油勘探与开发, 2003, 30(3):13-15.
Zhao Yong, Dai Junsheng.Identification of growth fault by faultfall analysis[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2003, 30(3):13-15.
[24] 陆克政, 戴俊生, 陈清华, 等.构造地质学教程[M].东营:石油大学出版社, 1996:151-156.
Lu Kezheng, Dai Junsheng, Chen Qinghua, et al.Structural geology and tectonics[M].Dongying:China University of Petroleum Press, 1996:151-156.
[25] Cartwright J A, Trudgill B D, Mansfield C S.Fault growth by segment linkage:an explanation for scatter in maximum displacement and trace length data from the Canyonlands Grabens of SE Utah[J].Journal of Structural Geology, 1995, 17(9):1319-1326.
[26] Willemse E J M, Pollard D D, Aydin A.Three-dimensional analyses of slip distributions on normal fault arrays with consequences for fault scaling[J].Journal of Structural Geology, 1996, 18(2/3):295-309.
[27] Wernicke B, Burchfiel B C.Models of extensional tectonics[J].Journal of Structural Geology, 1982, 4(2):105-115.
[28] 姜振学, 庞雄奇, 田丰华, 等.构造抬升卸压与油气成藏效应[J].石油天然气学报, 2006, 28(3):47-49.
Jiang Zhenxue, Pang Xiongqi, Tian Fenghua, et al.Tectonic uplifting and pressure releasing and the effect of hydrocarbon accumulation[J].Journal of Oil and Gas Technology, 2006, 28(3):47-49.
[29] 杨风丽, 王敏雪, 庄建建, 等.西湖凹陷反转构造定量运动学过程及对油气的控制作用[J].石油学报, 2010, 31(4):596-601.
Yang Fengli, Wang Minxue, Zhuang Jianjian, et al.Kinematical processes of inversion structure and its contribution to hydrocarbon accumulation in xihu depression of East China Sea Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2010, 31(4):596-601.
[30] 李三忠, 索艳慧, 戴黎明, 等.渤海湾盆地形成与华北克拉通破坏[J].地学前缘, 2010, 17(4):64-89.
Li Sanzhong, Suo Yanhui, Dai Liming, et al.Development of the Bohai Bay Basin and destruction of the North China Craton[J].Earth Science Frontiers, 2010, 17(4):64-89.
[31] 朱日祥, 徐义刚, 朱光, 等.华北克拉通破坏[J].中国科学D辑:地球科学, 2012, 42(8):1135-1159.
Zhu Rixiang, Xu Yigang, Zhu Guang, et al.Destruction of the North China Craton[J].Science China:Series D:Earth Sciences, 2012, 55(10):1565-1587.
[32] 李三忠, 周立宏, 刘建忠, 等.华北板块东部新生代断裂构造特征与盆地成因[J].海洋地质与第四纪地质, 2004, 24(3):57-66.
Li Sanzhong, Zhou Lihong, Liu Jianzhong, et al.Cenozoic faulting and basin formation in the Eastern North China plate[J].Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 2004, 24(3):57-66.
[33] 刘华, 蒋有录, 徐昊清, 等.冀中坳陷新近系油气成藏机理与成藏模式[J].石油学报, 2011, 32(6):928-936.
Liu Hua, Jiang Youlu, Xu Haoqing, et al.Accumulation mechanisms and modes of Neogene hydrocarbons in Jizhong depression[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2011, 32(6):928-936.
[34] 蒋有录, 卢浩, 刘华, 等.渤海湾盆地饶阳凹陷新近系油气富集特点与主控因素[J].石油学报, 2011, 32(5):791-796.
Jiang Youlu, Lu Hao, Liu Hua, et al.Enrichment characteristics and major controlling factors of hydrocarbons in the Neogene of Raoyang depression, Bohai Bay Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2011, 32(5):791-796.
[35] 崔树清.冀中坳陷饶阳凹陷构造特征及油气聚集[D].北京:中国地质大学, 2009.
Cui Shuqing.The structural characteristics and pools of petrileum accumulation of Raoyang sag in Jizhong depression[D].Beijing:China University of Geosciences, 2009.
[36] 马红岩, 闫保义, 高双, 等.饶阳凹陷潜山勘探新进展及新认识[J].石油地质, 2010, 2(4):19-23.
Ma Hongyan, Yan Baoyi, Gao Shuang, et al.Progress in exploration of deep buried hill in Raoyang sag[J].Petroleum Geology, 2010, 2(4):19-23.

构造活动强度划分断陷盆地构造区划——以饶阳凹陷为例

Structural divisions of rift basin based on the intensity of tectonic activity：a case study from the Raoyang sag

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 13

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	刘金水, 李树霞, 秦兰芝, 易琦, 陈晓东, 康世龙, 沈文超, 邵龙义. 东海盆地西湖凹陷古近系煤的生烃动力学[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(10): 1174-1187,1218.
[2]	陈晓艳, 郝芳, 邹华耀, 郭柳汐. 饶阳凹陷任丘潜山油藏油源对比及有效烃源岩成藏贡献[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(1): 59-67.
[3]	范存辉, 李虎, 钟城, 秦启荣, 胡东风, 张羽, 何顺, 张玮. 川东南丁山构造龙马溪组页岩构造裂缝期次及演化模式[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(4): 379-390.
[4]	赵贤正, 蒋有录, 金凤鸣, 刘华, 杨德相, 王鑫, 赵凯. 富油凹陷洼槽区油气成藏机理与成藏模式——以冀中坳陷饶阳凹陷为例[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38(1): 67-76.
[5]	金凤鸣, 侯凤香, 焦双志, 李熹微, 涂太明, 赵晨, 王鑫, 孙守刚. 断陷盆地断层-岩性油藏成藏主控因素——以饶阳凹陷留107区块为例[J]. 石油学报, 2016, 37(8): 986-995.
[6]	刘君龙, 纪友亮, 张克银, 李龙迪, 王天云, 杨永, 张洁. 川西前陆盆地侏罗系沉积体系变迁及演化模式[J]. 石油学报, 2016, 37(6): 743-756.
[7]	邵先杰, 王彩凤, 黄伟, 钟思瑛, 刘金华, 廖光明, 陈军. 苏北盆地金湖凹陷碳酸盐岩沉积特征及演化模式[J]. 石油学报, 2013, 34(4): 701-711.
[8]	袁圣强　贾承造　高日胜　潘文庆　侯福斗　齐建华　吴珍珍　法贵方. 塔中北斜坡中-下奥陶统碳酸盐岩沉积储层特征及地质模式[J]. 石油学报, 2012, 33(S1): 80-88.
[9]	王　珂　戴俊生. 地应力与断层封闭性之间的定量关系[J]. 石油学报, 2012, 33(1): 74-81.
[10]	蒋有录卢浩刘华杨德相范炳达. 渤海湾盆地饶阳凹陷新近系油气富集特点与主控因素[J]. 石油学报, 2011, 32(5): 791-796.
[11]	易士威赵淑芳范炳达刘井旺杨年荣谢怀兴. 冀中坳陷中央断裂构造带潜山发育特征及成藏模式[J]. 石油学报, 2010, 31(3): 361-367.
[12]	王建, 马顺平, 罗强, 国建英, 崔周旗. 渤海湾盆地饶阳凹陷烃源岩再认识与资源潜力分析[J]. 石油学报, 2009, 30(1): 51-55.
[13]	谭秀成, 邹娟, 李凌, 周彦, 罗冰, 刘宏, 姚宴波, 林建平. 磨溪气田嘉二段陆表海型台地内沉积微相研究[J]. 石油学报, 2008, 29(2): 219-225.