陆相多层砂岩油藏特高含水期三大矛盾特征及对策

doi:10.7623/syxb201502010

石油学报 ›› 2015, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (2): 210-216.DOI: 10.7623/syxb201502010

陆相多层砂岩油藏特高含水期三大矛盾特征及对策

朱丽红^1,2, 杜庆龙¹, 姜雪岩¹, 郭军辉¹, 魏丽影¹, 姜宇飞³, 金英华⁴

1. 大庆油田有限责任公司勘探开发研究院黑龙江大庆 163712;
2. 中国科学院地质与地球物理研究所北京 100029;
3. 长江大学地球科学学院湖北武汉 430100;
4. 大庆油田有限责任公司第六采油厂黑龙江大庆 163114

收稿日期:2014-08-07 修回日期:2014-11-07 出版日期:2015-02-25 发布日期:2015-02-05
通讯作者: 朱丽红,女,1969年5月生,1991年获大庆石油学院学士学位,2006年获吉林大学计算数学专业硕士学位,现为大庆油田有限责任公司勘探开发研究院高级工程师、中国科学院地质与地球物理研究所博士研究生,主要从事油田开发技术和剩余油研究。Email:zhulih@petrochina.com.cn
作者简介:朱丽红,女,1969年5月生,1991年获大庆石油学院学士学位,2006年获吉林大学计算数学专业硕士学位,现为大庆油田有限责任公司勘探开发研究院高级工程师、中国科学院地质与地球物理研究所博士研究生,主要从事油田开发技术和剩余油研究。Email:zhulih@petrochina.com.cn
基金资助:
国家重大科技专项(2011ZX05010-002,2011ZX05052)和中国石油天然气股份有限公司重大科技项目(2011E-1205)资助。

Characteristics and strategies of three major contradictions for continental facies multi-layered sandstone reservoir at ultra-high water cut stage

Zhu Lihong^1,2, Du Qinglong¹, Jiang Xueyan¹, Guo Junhui¹, Wei Liying¹, Jiang Yufei³, Jin Yinghua⁴

1. Exploration & Development Research Institute, Daqing Oilfield Company Limited, Heilongjiang Daqing 163712, China;
2. Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China;
3. College of Geoscience, Yangtze University, Hubei Wuhan 430100, China;
4. The 6th Production Plant, Daqing Oilfield Company Limited, Heilongjiang Daqing 163114, China

Received:2014-08-07 Revised:2014-11-07 Online:2015-02-25 Published:2015-02-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

大庆喇萨杏油田为大型陆相多层砂岩油藏,目前已进入特高含水开发阶段,各类储层渗流特征发生明显变化,剩余油分布高度零散,液/油比急剧上升,控含水、控递减难度日益加大。通过室内水驱油实验、精细油藏数值模拟、小井距密闭取心井及生产动态监测资料分析研究,系统剖析了特高含水期平面、层间及层内三大矛盾的变化特征,分析了影响三大矛盾加剧的主要因素。通过典型区块和近年检查井逐井逐层剩余油精细剖析,总结了平面、层间及层内剩余油分布特征,建立了平面、层间、层内3个层次的精细结构调整模式,并在大庆喇萨杏油田6个水驱精细挖潜示范区得到成功应用,在含水率为93% 的条件下,取得4年产油量不下降、含水率不上升的良好效果,探索出了一种特高含水期老油田水驱精细、深度开发的新模式,为多层砂岩油藏水驱开发提供了可借鉴的经验。

关键词: 陆相, 多层砂岩油藏, 特高含水期, 三大矛盾, 机理, 精细结构调整

Abstract:

Daqing Lasaxing oil field has large continental facies multi-layered sandstone reservoirs, which are at ultra-high water cut stage. There exist significant changes in percdation characteristics of various reservoirs; residual oil is highly scattered, and liquid/oil ratio rise sharply; and the difficulty in controlling water cut and production reduction is gradually increased. Based on the indoor water displacing oil experiment, fine reservoir numerical simulation, and analysis of sealed coring well with small spacing and dynamic production monitoring data, the variable characteristics of the three major contradictions of planar layer, interlayer and inner layer in high water cut stage, as well as the dominant factors influencing above contradictions were systemically analyzed. Through detailed analysis of the layer-by-layer residual oil of each well in typical block and investigated in recent years, the distribution characteristics of residual oil in planar layer, interlayer and inner layer were summarized; the fine structural adjustment model in these three levels was also established, and then successfully applied in 6 fine potential-tapping demonstration areas of water-flooding Daqing Lasaxing oil field. The water cut is 93% and not risen, based on which the oil production has not dropped for 4 years. Moreover, a new model of fine and deep development is explored for water-flooding maturing oil fields at ultra-high water cut stage, providing a reference for the development of multi-layered sandstone reservoirs using water flooding technique.

Key words: continental facies, multi-layer sandstone reservoir, ultra-high water cut stage, three major contradictions, mechanism, fine structural adjustment

中图分类号:

TE341

朱丽红, 杜庆龙, 姜雪岩, 郭军辉, 魏丽影, 姜宇飞, 金英华. 陆相多层砂岩油藏特高含水期三大矛盾特征及对策[J]. 石油学报, 2015, 36(2): 210-216.

Zhu Lihong, Du Qinglong, Jiang Xueyan, Guo Junhui, Wei Liying, Jiang Yufei, Jin Yinghua. Characteristics and strategies of three major contradictions for continental facies multi-layered sandstone reservoir at ultra-high water cut stage[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2015, 36(2): 210-216.

参考文献

[1] 徐守余,李红南.储集层孔喉网络场演化规律和剩余油分布[J].石油学报,2003,24(4):48-53.
Xu Shouyu,Li Hongnan.Evolvement of reservoir pore-throat -net and remaining oil distribution[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2003,24(4):48-53.
[2] 张洪兴,刘青年.大庆砂岩油层水淹后岩石物性参数变化实验研究[M]//大庆油田勘探开发研究论文集.北京:石油工业出版社,1995:325-337.
Zhang Hongxing,Liu Qingnian.Experimenal research on rock physical property changes after waterflooding in Daqing oilfield[M]//Reasearch proceedings of E&D reasearch institued of Daqing oilfield.Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,1995:325-337.
[3] 王乃举.中国油藏开发模式总论[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1999:113-136.
Wang Naiju.General reservoir development models in China[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,1999:113-136.
[4] 张洪兴.油层水淹后岩石物性的变化规律及残余油的变化特点[M]//大庆石油管理局科技处.油藏工程.北京:石油工业出版社,1996:21-31.
Zhang Hongxing.Research on rock physical property changes and residual oil charateristics after waterflooding[M]//Department of Science and Technology of Daqing Petroleum Adminstration Bureau.Reservoir engingeering.Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,1996:21-31.
[5] 王志章.开发中后期油藏参数变化规律及变化机理[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1998:27-35.
Wang Zhizhang.Changing law and mechanism of reservoir parameters in middle later development period[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,1998:27-35.
[6] 朱丽红,杜庆龙,李忠江,等.高含水期储集层物性和润湿性变化规律研究[J].石油勘探与开发,2004,31(增刊):82-84.
Zhu Lihong,Du Qinglong,Li Zhongjiang,et al.Variation of physical characteristics and wettability of the reservoir in high water-cut stage[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2004,31(Supplement):82-84.
[7] 林承焰,孙廷彬,董春梅,等.基于单砂体的特高含水期剩余油精细表征[J].石油学报,2013,34(6):1131-1136.
Lin Chengyan,Sun Tingbin,Dong Chunmei,et al.Fine characterization of remaining oil based on a single sand body in the high water cut period[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2013,34(6):1131-1136.
[8] 封从军,鲍志东,陈炳春,等.扶余油田基于单因素解析多因素耦合的剩余油预测[J].石油学报,2012,33(3):465-471.
Feng Congjun,Bao Zhidong,Chen Bingchun,et al.Application of the single factor analysis and multifactor coupling method to the remaining oil prediction in Fuyu oilfield[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2012,33(3):465-471.
[9] 陈程,宋新民,李军.曲流河点砂坝储层水流优势通道及其对剩余油分布的控制[J].石油学报,2012,33(2):257-263.
Chen Cheng,Song Xinmin,Li Jun.Dominant flow channels of point-bar reservoirs and their control on the distribution of remaining oils[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2012,33(2):257-263.
[10] 李志鹏,林承焰,董波,等.河控三角洲水下分流河道砂体内部建筑结构模式[J].石油学报,2012,33(1):101-105.
Li Zhipeng,Lin Chengyan,Dong Bo,et al.An internal structure model of subaqueous distributary channel sands of the fluvial-dominated delta[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2012,33(1):101-105.
[11] 林承焰,余成林,董春梅,等.老油田剩余油分布——水下分流河道岔道口剩余油富集[J].石油学报,2011,32(5):829-835.
Lin Chengyan,Yu Chenglin,Dong Chunmei,et al.Remaining oils distribution in old oilfields:enrichment of remaining oils in underwater distributary channel crotches[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2011,32(5):829-835.
[12] 刘钰铭,侯加根,宋保全,等.辫状河厚砂层内部夹层表征——以大庆喇嘛甸油田为例[J].石油学报,2011,32(5):836-841.
Liu Yuming,Hou Jiagen,Song Baoquan,et al.Characterization of interlayers within braided-river thick sandstones:a case study on the Lamadian oilfield in Daqin g[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2011,32(5):836-841.
[13] 韩大匡.准确预测剩余油相对富集区提高油田注水采收率研究[J].石油学报,2007,28(2):73-78.
Han Dakuang.Precisely predicting abundant remaining oil and improving the secondary recovery of mature oilfields[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2007,28(2):73-78.
[14] 林博,戴俊生,冀国盛,等.河流相建筑结构随机建模与剩余油分布研究[J].石油学报,2007,28(4):81-85.
Lin Bo,Dai Junsheng,Ji Guosheng,et al.Study on stochastic modeling of architectural element and remaining oil distribution in fluvial facies reservoir [J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2007,28(4):81-85.
[15] 刘建民,徐守余.河流相储层沉积模式及对剩余油分布的控制[J].石油学报,2003,24(1):58-62.
Liu Jianmin,Xu Shouyu.Reservoir sedimentary model of fluvial facies and it’s control to remaining oil distribution[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2003,24(1):58-62.
[16] Du Qinglong,Qing Lu,Cheng Baoqing,et al.Research on the method of determination for remaining oil at late period of high water cut stage[R].SPE 50896,1998.
[17] Du Qinglong,Shi Chengfang,Zhu Lihong,et al.Study on the distribution characteristics of remaining oil in fluvial-deltaic reservoirs at high water cut stage[R].SPE 84875,2003.
[18] Zhu Lihong,Du Qinglong,Guo Junhui,et al.Water-out characteristics and remaining oil distribution pattern of different types of channel sands in Lasaxing oilfield[R].IPTC12482,2008.
[19] Karim M G A,Razib M R B.Optimizing development strategy and maximizing field economic recovery through simulation opportunity index[R].SPE 148103,2011.
[20] PangYanming,Du Qinglong,Jiang Xueyan,et al.Research and practice of Daqing oilfield on fine and efficient water flooding development at the ultra high water cut stage [R].IPTC 17102,2013.
[21] 计秉玉,李彦兴.喇萨杏油田高含水期提高采收率的主要技术对策[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2004,23(5):47-53.
Ji Bingyu,Li Yanxing.Main technical countermeasures of enhanced oil recovery during high water cut stage in La-Sa-Xing reservoirs[J].Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing,2004,23(5):47-53.
[22] 张英志.萨北开发区特高含水期层系井网演化趋势研究[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2006,25(增刊):4-7.
Zhang Yingzhi.Evolutionary trend of well pattern for ultra-high water bearing bed sets in the north of Saertu development area[J].Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing,2006,25(Supplement):4-7.

陆相多层砂岩油藏特高含水期三大矛盾特征及对策

Characteristics and strategies of three major contradictions for continental facies multi-layered sandstone reservoir at ultra-high water cut stage

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	匡立春, 侯连华, 杨智, 吴松涛. 陆相页岩油储层评价关键参数及方法[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(1): 1-14.
[2]	宋明水. 胜坨油田成藏条件及勘探开发关键技术[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(1): 128-142.
[3]	祝效华, 罗云旭, 刘伟吉, 高锐, 贾玉丹, 刘呈君. 等离子体电脉冲钻井破岩机理的电击穿实验与数值模拟方法[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(9): 1146-1162.
[4]	赵贤正, 周立宏, 蒲秀刚, 时战楠, 韩国猛, 吴佳朋, 韩文中, 张伟, 高欢欢, 马建英, 汪虎. 歧口凹陷歧北次凹沙河街组三段页岩油地质特征与勘探突破[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(6): 643-657.
[5]	金衍, 韦世明, 陈康平, 夏阳. 致密气自扩散渗流模型[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(6): 737-744.
[6]	张辉, 蔡志翔, 陈安明, 刘科柔, 杨茂林, 余庆, 王昊, 谭天一, 陈雨飞. 液相放电等离子体破岩室内实验与破岩机理[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(5): 615-628.
[7]	王家豪, 王华, 肖敦清, 蒲秀刚, 韩文忠, 张伟. 陆相断陷湖盆异重流与滑塌型重力流沉积辨别[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(4): 392-402,411.
[8]	刘合, 匡立春, 李国欣, 王峰, 金旭, 陶嘉平, 孟思炜. 中国陆相页岩油完井方式优选的思考与建议[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(4): 489-496.
[9]	张昌民, 宋新民, 支东明, 周心怀, 尹太举, 尹艳树, 朱锐, 冯文杰, 张宝进. 陆相含油气盆地沉积体系再思考:来自分支河流体系的启示[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(2): 127-153.
[10]	宋岩, 高凤琳, 唐相路, 陈磊, 王幸蒙. 海相与陆相页岩储层孔隙结构差异的影响因素[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(12): 1501-1512.
[11]	孙金声, 赵震, 白英睿, 吕开河, 王金堂, 王韧, 王晨烨, 戴立瑶. 智能自愈合凝胶研究进展及在钻井液领域的应用前景[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(12): 1706-1718.
[12]	杜学斌, 刘晓峰, 陆永潮, 刘惠民, 张守鹏, 马义权, 赵珂, 魏巍. 陆相细粒混合沉积分类、特征及发育模式——以东营凹陷为例[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(11): 1324-1333.
[13]	王付勇, 曾繁超, 赵久玉. 低渗透/致密油藏驱替-渗吸数学模型及其应用[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(11): 1396-1405.
[14]	邹才能, 潘松圻, 荆振华, 高金亮, 杨智, 吴松涛, 赵群. 页岩油气革命及影响[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(1): 1-12.
[15]	兰才俊, 徐哲航, 马肖琳, 胡超, 陈浩如, 邹华耀. 四川盆地震旦系灯影组丘滩体发育分布及对储层的控制[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(9): 1069-1084.