水力脉冲波协同多氢酸酸化解堵反应动力学模型

doi:10.7623/syxb201604009

石油学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (4): 499-507.DOI: 10.7623/syxb201604009

水力脉冲波协同多氢酸酸化解堵反应动力学模型

何延龙¹, 蒲春生¹, 董巧玲², 景成¹, 谷潇雨¹, 韩春春³, 纪超⁴, 刘洪志¹, 李晓¹

1. 中国石油大学石油工程学院山东青岛 266580;
2. 大庆油田有限责任公司第三采油厂黑龙江大庆 163712;
3. 中国石油青海油田公司采油三厂青海海西 816400;
4. 中国石油化工股份有限公司胜利油田分公司孤东采油厂山东东营 257051

收稿日期:2015-10-13 修回日期:2016-02-07 出版日期:2016-04-25 发布日期:2016-05-06
通讯作者: 蒲春生,男,1959年3月生,1982年毕业于西安交通大学计算数学专业,1992年获西南石油学院博士学位,现为中国石油大学(华东)教授、博士生导师,主要从事复杂油气藏物理-化学强化开采技术方面的研究。Email:chshpu@163.com
作者简介:何延龙,男,1987年3月生,2009年获兰州理工大学学士学位,现为中国石油大学(华东)油气田开发工程专业博士研究生,主要从事复杂油气藏物理-化学强化开采技术方面的研究。Email:stpnet@126.com
基金资助:
国家重大科技专项(2009ZX05009)和国家自然科学基金项目(No.51104173)资助。

Kinetic model of plug removal reaction based on a synergy between hydraulic pulse wave and multi-hydracid acidification

He Yanlong¹, Pu Chunsheng¹, Dong Qiaoling², Jing Cheng¹, Gu Xiaoyu¹, Han Chunchun³, Ji Chao⁴, Liu Hongzhi¹, Li Xiao¹

1. School of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum, Shandong Qingdao 266580, China;
2. No. 3 Oil Production Plant, Daqing Oilfield Limited Company, Heilongjiang Daqing 163712, China;
3. The 3rd Oil Production Plant, PetroChina Qinghai Oilfield Company, Qinghai Haixi 816400, China;
4. Gudong Oil Production Plant, Sinopec Shengli Oilfield Company, Shandong Dongying 257051, China

Received:2015-10-13 Revised:2016-02-07 Online:2016-04-25 Published:2016-05-06

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

水力脉冲波协同多氢酸酸化技术对于高压注水、注汽井近井区域的储层堵塞具有高效的解堵效果。但目前针对该项技术的模拟理论及动力学研究较少,现场工艺参数设计存在一定的盲目性。基于多氢酸活性酸组分的酸岩反应模型,以水力脉冲波传播动力学为基础,构建了水力脉冲波协同多氢酸酸化反应动力学模型;研究了孔隙度、渗透率、酸液及矿物浓度随时间和距离的变化规律,分析了水力脉冲波协同多氢酸酸化解堵的参数敏感性,并进行了矿场应用分析。研究表明:协同作用进一步提高了储层的酸化解堵效果,明显改善了酸液流速、酸液及矿物浓度的分布;振幅、频率较高时,酸液流速的径向差异直接影响相邻位置的解堵效果。针对不同类型的砂岩油藏设计了水力脉冲波协同多氢酸酸化解堵参数,并成功开展11井次矿场试验,注水压力平均下降6.3 MPa,注汽压力平均下降3.5 MPa,起到了显著的解堵降压增注效果。

关键词: 水力脉冲波, 多氢酸, 解堵, 动力学模型, 酸岩反应

Abstract:

The synergetic technology between hydraulic pulse wave and multi-hydracid acidification shows a highly-efficient plug removal effect against reservoir plugging in the vicinity of high-pressure water and steam injection wells. However, currently there is seldom research on the simulation theory and kinetics of such technology, and a certain blindness exists in the field process parameter design. The kinetic model of a synergy between hydraulic pulse wave and multi-hydracid acidification reaction was established based on the acidic rock reaction model of multi-hydracid active acid components as well as the transmission dynamics of hydraulic pulse wave; a study was conducted on the variation laws of porosity, permeability, acid and mineral concentration over time and distance. Meanwhile, the parameter sensitivity of a synergy between hydraulic pulse wave and multi-hydracid acidification for plug removal was analyzed. Finally, field application analysis was also carried out. The results show that the synergy effect further enhances the acidizing plug-removal effect of reservoirs and obviously improves the distribution of acid flow rate, acid and mineral concentration. In case of high amplitude and frequency, the plug removal effect at adjacent positions is directly influenced by radial difference in acid flow rate. Aiming at different types of sandstone reservoirs, the plug removal parameters based on a synergy between hydraulic pulse wave and multi-hydracid acidification are designed to successfully carry out field tests in 11 wells. The average reduction of water and steam injection pressure is 6.3 MPa and 3.5 MPa respectively, leading to significant effects on plug removal, pressure reduction and injection stimulation.

Key words: hydraulic pulse wave, multi-hydracid, plug removal, kinetic model, acidic rock reaction

中图分类号:

TE357.2

何延龙, 蒲春生, 董巧玲, 景成, 谷潇雨, 韩春春, 纪超, 刘洪志, 李晓. 水力脉冲波协同多氢酸酸化解堵反应动力学模型[J]. 石油学报, 2016, 37(4): 499-507.

He Yanlong, Pu Chunsheng, Dong Qiaoling, Jing Cheng, Gu Xiaoyu, Han Chunchun, Ji Chao, Liu Hongzhi, Li Xiao. Kinetic model of plug removal reaction based on a synergy between hydraulic pulse wave and multi-hydracid acidification[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2016, 37(4): 499-507.

参考文献

[1] 吴奇,胥云,张守良,等.非常规油气藏体积改造技术核心理论与优化设计关键[J].石油学报,2014,35(4):706-714.
Wu Qi,Xu Yun,Zhang Shouliang,et al.The core theories and key optimization designs of volume stimulation technology for unconventional reservoirs[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2014,35(4):706-714.
[2] 侯健,邱茂鑫,陆努,等.采用CT技术研究岩心剩余油微观赋存状态[J].石油学报,2014,35(2):319-325.
Hou Jian,Qiu Maoxin,Lu Nu,et al.Characterization of residual oil microdistribution at pore scale using computerized tomography[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2014,35(2):319-325.
[3] Babadagli T.Temperature effect on heavy-oil recovery by imbibition in fractured reservoirs[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,1996,14(3/4):197-208.
[4] Jiang Chunqing,Larter S R,Noke K J,et al.TLC-FID (Iatroscan) analysis of heavy oil and tar sand samples[J].Organic Geochemistry,2008,39(8):1210-1214.
[5] 董长银,隆佳佳,王登庆,等.防砂水平井旋转水射流解堵工艺参数优化实验[J].石油学报,2013,34(4):759-764.
Dong Changyin,Long Jiajia,Wang Dengqing,et al.Experiment of parameters optimization for plug removal by rotating jet flow in sand-control horizontal wells[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2013,34(4):759-764.
[6] 王天源,修建龙,黄立信,等.多孔介质微生物提高原油采收率模型[J].石油学报,2016,37(1):97-105.
Wang Tianyuan,Xiu Jianlong,Huang Lixin,et al.Microbial enhanced oil recovery model in porous media[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2016,37(1):97-105.
[7] 谷穗,蔡记华,常德武,等.使用纳米碳酸钙降低低孔低渗煤层气储层伤害[J].地球科学——中国地质大学学报,2015,40(6):1093-1100.
Gu Sui,Cai Jihua,Chang Dewu,et al.Reducing formation damage to low-porosity and low-permeability CBM reservoirs using calcium carbonate nanoparticles[J].Earth Science:Journal of China University of Geosciences,2015,40(6):1093-1100.
[8] 祖凯.多氢酸体系性能及适应性研究[D].成都:西南石油大学,2012.
Zu Kai.The properties and adaptation of muti-hydrogen acid system[D].Chengdu:Southwest Petroleum University,2012.
[9] 彭瑀,李勇明,赵金洲,等.缝洞型碳酸盐岩油藏酸蚀裂缝导流能力模拟与分析[J].石油学报,2015,36(5):606-611.
Peng Yu,Li Yongming,Zhao Jinzhou,et al.Simulation and analysis of acid-etched fracture conductivity of fracture-cavity carbonate reservoirs[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2015,36(5):606-611.
[10] 王元庆,林长志,王连生,等.低渗碳酸盐岩储层深度酸化酸液体系优选与评价[J].地质科技情报,2014,33(1):100-105.
Wang Yuanqing,Lin Changzhi,Wang Liansheng,et al.Development and evaluation of deep penetrating acid fluid system for low permeability carbonate reservoir[J].Geological Science and Technology Information,2014,33(1):100-105.
[11] MaGee J,Buijse M A,Pongratz R.Method for effective fluid diversion when performing a matrix acid stimulation in carbonate formations[R].SPE 37736,1997.
[12] Williams B B,Whiteley M E.Hydrofluoric acid reaction with a porous sandstone[J].Society of Petroleum Engineers,1971,11(3):306-314.
[13] Bryant S L.An improved model of mud acid/sandstone chemistry[R].SPE 22855,1991.
[14] Guo Xiao,Du Zhimin,Li Guanquan,et al.High frequency vibration recovery enhancement technology in the heavy oil fields of China[R].SPE 86956,2004.
[15] Li Wenqing,Vigil R D,Beresnev I A,et al.Vibration-induced mobilization of trapped oil ganglia in porous media:experimental validation of a capillary-physics mechanism[J].Journal of Colloid and Interface Science,2005,289(1):193-199.
[16] 张建国,刘全国,甄思广.低频水力振动器解堵原理及现场应用[J].石油大学学报:自然科学版,2003,27(5):47-49.
Zhang Jianguo,Liu Quanguo,Zhen Siguang.Plug removal mechanism and field application of low-frequency hydraulic vibrator[J].Journal of the University of Petroleum,China:Edition of Natural Sciences,2003,27(5):47-49.
[17] 饶鹏.低渗油藏水力脉冲波辅助深度酸化降压增注技术研究[D].青岛:中国石油大学(华东),2013.
Rao Peng.Research on hydraulic pulse wave assisted deep acidification technique of decreasing pressure and increasing injection in low permeability reservoir[D].Qingdao:China University of Petroleum,2013.
[18] 祖凯,郭建春.蒙脱石与土酸、多氢酸反应对比实验研究[J].油田化学,2012,29(1):83-85.
Zu Kai,Guo Jianchun.Comparative experimental study on reaction of montmorillonite with mud acid and multi-hydrogen acid[J].Oilfield Chemistry,2012,29(1):83-85.
[19] 李松岩,李兆敏,李宾飞.砂岩基质酸化中酸岩反应数学模型[J].中国矿业大学学报,2012,41(2):236-241.
Li Songyan,Li Zhaomin,Li Binfei.Acid/sandstone reaction modeling for sandstone-matrix acidizing[J].Journal of China University of Mining & Technology,2012,41(2):236-241.
[20] 蒲春生,王香增.复杂油藏波场强化开采理论与技术[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2014.
Pu Chunsheng,Wang Xiangzeng.The theory and techniques of enhanced oil recovery for the complex reservoir with the wave field[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2014.
[21] 赵立强,邹洪岚,黄开林.暂堵酸化工艺技术及其应用[J].天然气工业,1998,18(2):49-52.
Zhao Liqiang,Zou Honglan,Huang Kailin.Temporary plugging acidizing technique and its application[J].Natural Gas Industry,1998,18(2):49-52.
[22] 刘平礼,薛衡,李年银,等.基于指数伤害模型的砂岩酸化模拟[J].石油钻采工艺,2014,36(1):79-84.
Liu Pingli,Xue Heng,Li Nianyin,et al.Sandstone acidizing simulation based on exponential damage model[J].Oil Drilling & Production Technology,2014,36(1):79-84.
[23] 刘静,蒲春生,郑黎明,等.低频谐振波降低表面活性剂吸附特性的研究[J].应用基础与工程科学学报,2013,21(5):946-952.
Liu Jing,Pu Chunsheng,Zheng Liming,et al.Research on decreasing adsorption characteristics of surfactant under low frequency resonance wave[J].Journal of Basic Science and Engineering,2013,21(5):946-952.

水力脉冲波协同多氢酸酸化解堵反应动力学模型

Kinetic model of plug removal reaction based on a synergy between hydraulic pulse wave and multi-hydracid acidification

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	高嘉珮, 彭冲, 牛梦龙, 郑建刚, 李亚洲, 欧阳诗昆, 李稳宏. 多氢酸酸化反应特征及动力学[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(2): 207-214.
[2]	董长银, 隆佳佳, 王登庆, 吴建平, 张忠禄, 张晓斌. 防砂水平井旋转水射流解堵工艺参数优化实验[J]. 石油学报, 2013, 34(4): 759-764.
[3]	程载斌, 姜伟, 任革学, 周建良, 蒋世全, 杨蔡进, 何保生. 全井钻柱系统多体动力学模型[J]. 石油学报, 2013, 34(4): 753-758.
[4]	李吉君, 卢双舫, 薛海涛, 胡国艺, 徐庆霞. 和田河气田天然气运聚效率及源区探讨[J]. 石油学报, 2009, 30(3): 347-353.
[5]	狄勤丰, 朱卫平, 姚建林, 赵业荣, 雷桐, 张汉林. 空气钻井钻具组合动力学特征及井斜机理研究[J]. 石油学报, 2008, 29(6): 917-921.
[6]	祝效华, 刘清友, 童华. 三维井眼全井钻柱系统动力学模型研究[J]. 石油学报, 2008, 29(2): 288-291,295.
[7]	王民, 卢双舫, 胡慧婷, 申家年, 薛海涛. 有机质生成生物气的生化动力学模型及其应用[J]. 石油学报, 2008, 29(1): 75-78.
[8]	刘合, 王素玲. 用有限元法预测抽油杆柱与油管柱偏磨点位置[J]. 石油学报, 2008, 29(1): 149-152.
[9]	狄勤丰, 朱卫平, 姚建林, 邹海洋. 预弯曲动力学防斜打快钻具组合动力学模型[J]. 石油学报, 2007, 28(6): 118-121.
[10]	易灿, 李根生, 郭春阳, 张定国. 自振空化射流改善油层特性实验研究及现场应用[J]. 石油学报, 2006, 27(1): 81-84,88.
[11]	杨海滨, 狄勤丰, 王文昌. 抽油杆柱与油管偏磨机理及偏磨点位置预测[J]. 石油学报, 2005, 26(2): 100-103.
[12]	李根生, 黄中伟, 张德斌, 田仲强, 张满库. 高压水射流与化学剂复合解堵工艺的机理及应用[J]. 石油学报, 2005, 26(1): 96-99.
[13]	常子恒, 何开平, 童伏松, 叶德平, 曹苏文. 复合暂堵—解堵技术在裂缝型气藏水平井中的应用[J]. 石油学报, 2002, 23(6): 41-44,49.
[14]	刘开第, 庞彦军, 孙光勇. 解堵技术选优决策的未确知测度模型[J]. 石油学报, 2001, 22(1): 89-94.
[15]	李根生, 马加计, 沈晓明, 张彦福, 毕文亮. 高压水射流处理地层的机理及试验[J]. 石油学报, 1998, 19(1): 96-99.