深水导管架平台结构动力推覆分析方法

doi:10.7623/syxb201612011

石油学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (12): 1550-1556.DOI: 10.7623/syxb201612011

深水导管架平台结构动力推覆分析方法

朱本瑞^1,2, 陈国明², 林红², 刘红兵²

1. 天津大学建筑工程学院天津 300072;
2. 中国石油大学海洋油气装备与安全技术研究中心山东青岛 266580

收稿日期:2016-06-12 修回日期:2016-11-01 出版日期:2016-12-25 发布日期:2017-01-06
通讯作者: 陈国明,男,1962年10月生,1982年获华东石油学院学士学位,1999年获石油大学(华东)博士学位,现为中国石油大学(华东)教授、博士生导师,主要从事海洋油气工程及装备、油气安全工程方面的研究。Email:offshore@126.com
作者简介:朱本瑞,男,1986年10月生,2009年获中国石油大学(华东)学士学位,2014年获中国石油大学(华东)博士学位,现为天津大学讲师,主要从事海洋石油平台结构极限状态分析的研究。Email:zhubenrui@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（No.51079159，No.51579246）、国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目（No.51509184）和中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目（15CX05003A）资助。

Dynamic pushover analysis method of deep-water jacket platform

Zhu Benrui^1,2, Chen Guoming², Lin Hong², Liu Hongbing²

1. School of Civil Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China;
2. Centre for Offshore Engineering and Safety Technology, China University of Petroleum, Shandong Qingdao 266580, China

Received:2016-06-12 Revised:2016-11-01 Online:2016-12-25 Published:2017-01-06

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

针对动力放大效应明显的深水导管架平台，将非线性动力分析与传统Pushover相结合，提出动力推覆分析（DPA）方法，用于研究平台结构极限承载能力及倒塌力学行为。提出安定状态的概念，作为平台动力倒塌的临界判据，引入动强度储备比和动载比等指标，建立了完善的DPA评估体系。以某深水导管架平台为例，分别从平台极限承载能力、位移响应以及失效模式3个方面对DPA和传统Pushover方法进行对比分析。结果表明：考虑动力放大效应后，基于DPA评估的平台极限位移增大，强度储备有所降低，相比Pushover方法，评估精度更高；DPA与Pushover方法所得到的塑性分布基本相同，载荷动态效应不会改变平台结构的失效模式；DPA能够更好地反映环境载荷动态历程，有效追踪平台结构的倒塌失效过程。

关键词: 动力推覆分析, 导管架平台, 极限承载能力, 动力放大效应, 失效模式, 倒塌过程

Abstract:

Aiming at the deep-water jacket platforms with significant dynamic amplification, Dynamic Pushover Analysis(DPA) method was proposed based on nonlinear dynamic analysis and traditional Pushover analysis, and used to estimate the ultimate bearing capacity and collapse mechanical behavior of deep-water jacket platforms. The concept of shakedown was put forward as the critical criterion of platform dynamic collapse. Dynamic Reserve Strength Ratio, Dynamic Load Ratio and other indicators were introduced, so as to establish the perfect DPA evaluation system. Taking a certain deep-water jacket platform as an example, a deeply comparative analysis was conducted between DPA and traditional Pushover method from three aspects of platform ultimate bearing capacity, displacement response and failure mode. The results show that with consideration of dynamic amplification and based on DPA evaluation, the platform ultimate displacement is increased, and the reserve strength is reduced; the evaluation precision is higher as compared with Pushover analysis results. The plastic distribution obtained by DPA and Pushover is basically similar, and the loading dynamic effect is unable to change the failure mode of platform structure. DPA can better reflect the dynamic process of environmental loading, so as to effectively track the collapse failure process of platform structures.

Key words: dynamic pushover analysis, jacket platform, ultimate bearing capacity, dynamic amplification, failure mode, collapse process

中图分类号:

TE951

朱本瑞, 陈国明, 林红, 刘红兵. 深水导管架平台结构动力推覆分析方法[J]. 石油学报, 2016, 37(12): 1550-1556.

Zhu Benrui, Chen Guoming, Lin Hong, Liu Hongbing. Dynamic pushover analysis method of deep-water jacket platform[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2016, 37(12): 1550-1556.

参考文献

[1] Spong Jr.R E,Frank Puskar P E.Assessment of fixed offshore platform performance in Hurricane Andrew,Lili and Ivan[R].MMS Project 549,2006.
[2] Puskar F J,Spong R E,Ku A,et al.Assessment of fixed offshore platform performance in Hurricane Ivan[R].SPE OTC-18325,2006.
[3] Forristall G Z.Wave crest heights and deck damage in hurricanes Ivan,Katrina,and Rita[C].SPE OTC-18620,2007.
[4] Puskar F J,Verret S.Assessment of fixed offshore platform performance in Katrina and Rita[R].MMS Project 578,2007.
[5] Chevron Corporation.Ultimate Limit Strength(ULS) of fixed offshore platforms[R].Chevron USA Inc,2007.
[6] 朱本瑞,陈国明,刘康,等.深水导管架平台抗台风极限承载能力[J].石油学报,2014,35(1):152-158.
Zhu Benrui,Chen Guoming,Liu Kang,et al.Typhoon-resistant ultimate bearing capacity of deep-water jacket platforms[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2014,35(1):152-158.
[7] Moan T.Development of accidental collapse limit state criteria for offshore structures[J].Structural Safety,2009,31(2):124-135.
[8] 朱本瑞,陈国明,林红,等.极端环境下导管架平台连续倒塌鲁棒性评估[J].中国石油大学学报:自然科学版,2015,39(6):138-144.
Zhu Benrui,Chen Guoming,Lin Hong,et al.Robustness assessment of jacket platforms for progressive collapse under extreme environmental loading[J].Journal of China University of Petroleum:Edition of Natural Sciences,2015,39(6):138-144.
[9] 林红,陈国明,朱本瑞,等.海洋石油平台结构全寿命周期动态鲁棒性分析[J].石油学报,2015,36(2):246-252.
Lin Hong,Chen Guoming,Zhu Benrui,et al.Dynamic robustness analysis of the offshore platform in the whole life cycle[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2015,36(2):246-252.
[10] 刘康,陈国明,畅元江,等.深水测试管柱作业条件下平台偏移预警界限[J].石油学报,2014,35(6):1204-1210.
Liu Kang,Chen Guoming,Chang Yuanjiang,et al.Warning control boundary of platform offset in deepwater test string[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2014,35(6):1204-1210.
[11] American Petroleum Institute.Recommended practice for planning,designing and constructing fixed offshore platforms-working stress design[S].Washington,DC:API Publishing Sevices,2007.
[12] International Organization for Standardization.ISO 19902 Petroleum and natural gas industries-fixed steel offshore structures[S].International Organization for Standardization,2007.
[13] Det Norske Veritas.DNV-OS-C101 Design of offshore steel structures,general(LRFD Method)[S].Norway:Det Norske Veritas,2008.
[14] Golafshani A A,Bagheri V,Ebrahimian H,et al.Incremental wave analysis and its application to performance-based assessment of jacket platforms[J].Journal of Constructional Steel Research,2011,67(10):1649-1657.
[15] Raaij K V.Dynamic behaviour of jackets exposed to wave-in-deck forces[D].Norway:University of Stavanger,2005.
[16] Kwasniewski L.Nonlinear dynamic simulations of progressive collapse for a multistory building[J]. Engineering Structures,2010,32(5):1223-1235.
[17] 朱本瑞,陈国明,刘红兵,等.超强台风下导管架平台结构弹塑性分析[J].中国海上油气,2014,26(6):86-92.
Zhu Benrui,Chen Guoming,Liu Hongbing,et al.Structure elastic-plastic analysis for jacket platform under super-typhoon[J].China Offshore Oil and Gas,2014,26(6):86-92.
[18] Assareh M A,Asgarian B.Nonlinear behavior of single piles in jacket type offshore platforms using incremental dynamic analysis[J].American Journal of Applied Sciences,2008,5(12):1793-1803.
[19] Xu C,Yang Y.Study on structural overall safety of jacket platforms based on dynamic failure mechanism analysis[C]//The Twenty-fourth International Ocean and Polar Engineering Conference.Busan,Korea:ISOPE,2014.
[20] 朱本瑞,陈国明,林红,等.极端波浪载荷下导管架平台抗倒塌性能评估[J].中国石油大学学报:自然科学版,2014,38(3):135-141.
Zhu Benrui,Chen Guoming,Lin Hong,et al.Anti-collapse performance assessment of jacket offshore platforms in extreme storm waves[J].Journal of China University of Petroleum:Edition of Natural Science,2014,38(3):135-141.
[21] Wang Jielong,Li Zhigang.Implementation of HHT algorithm for numerical integration of multibody dynamics with holonomic constraints[J].Nonlinear Dynamics,2015,80(1/2):817-825.

深水导管架平台结构动力推覆分析方法

Dynamic pushover analysis method of deep-water jacket platform

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 4

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王言聿, 成志强, 郭旭. 复合材料增强管线钢管压力设计新方法[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(8): 1025-1032.
[2]	朱本瑞, 陈国明, 刘康, 林红, 陈维杰. 深水导管架平台抗台风极限承载能力[J]. 石油学报, 2014, 35(1): 152-158.
[3]	林红陈国明. 考虑疲劳裂纹的老龄平台检修规划及经济寿命预测[J]. 石油学报, 2011, 32(5): 905-910.
[4]	李亚明, 胡云昌, 项忠权. 井架在风荷载作用下的可靠性分析[J]. 石油学报, 1997, 18(1): 116-122.