克拉通盆地微古地貌恢复的构造趋势面转换法

doi:10.7623/syxb201701008

石油学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (1): 77-83,104.DOI: 10.7623/syxb201701008

克拉通盆地微古地貌恢复的构造趋势面转换法

王建国¹, 蒋传杰², 常森², 杜孝华², 何顺利¹, 顾岱鸿¹

1. 中国石油大学石油工程教育部重点实验室北京 102249;
2. 中国石油长庆油田公司第五采气厂陕西西安 710018

收稿日期:2016-03-23 修回日期:2016-10-19 出版日期:2017-01-25 发布日期:2017-01-23
通讯作者: 王建国,男,1978年7月生,2001年获石油大学(北京)学士学位,2007年获中国石油大学(北京)博士学位,现为中国石油大学(北京)石油工程学院讲师,主要从事油气开发地质科研与教学工作。Email:wjglww@cup.edu.cn
作者简介:王建国,男,1978年7月生,2001年获石油大学(北京)学士学位,2007年获中国石油大学(北京)博士学位,现为中国石油大学(北京)石油工程学院讲师,主要从事油气开发地质科研与教学工作。Email:wjglww@cup.edu.cn
基金资助:
中国石油大学（北京）科研基金项目（2462015YQ0222）资助。

Structural trend surface conversion method for micro-amplitude paleotopographic restoration of cratonic basins

Wang Jianguo¹, Jiang Chuanjie², Chang Sen², Du Xiaohua², He Shunli¹, Gu Daihong¹

1. MOE Key Laboratory of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China;
2. No. 5 Gas Production Plant, PetroChina Changqing Oilfield Company, Shaanxi Xi'an 710018, China

Received:2016-03-23 Revised:2016-10-19 Online:2017-01-25 Published:2017-01-23

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为推算克拉通盆地弱构造变形区海相沉积期微幅度古地貌，提出了一种基于构造趋势面转换的沉积期微幅度古地貌推算方法。方法假设克拉通盆地的多阶段升降或扭转构造运动表现为构造趋势面的变动，但该变动并没有改变局部古高地与其周围地形的拟构造幅度。该方法的技术流程为，首先利用现今构造图及其趋势面求得拟构造幅度；然后将地层剥蚀线的平均走向近似于沉积期构造趋势面的走向，求得沉积期构造趋势面倾向；利用将今论古的思想借用现今潮坪相平均坡度作为沉积期构造趋势面的倾角；最后将沉积期构造趋势面与拟构造幅度相加即得沉积期古地形图。在此基础上，结合取心井的岩石学、白云石化类型，可以更好地确定海相沉积体系中各亚相或微相的分布范围。将此方法应用于苏里格气田东区下奥陶统马家沟组五段5亚段潮坪相碳酸盐岩地层的应用效果表明，研究区构造趋势面由NW-SE倾向变动到NE-SW倾向，其并没有改变沉积期局部古地貌与其周围地形的相对高低关系，该方法能够有效地刻画出潮坪相沉积期微幅度古地貌。沉积期水下微幅度古地貌隆起部位是控制该区潮坪相碳酸盐岩颗粒滩分布的关键因素，颗粒滩又是后期白云石化并发育为优质储层最有利的微相。因此，在准确刻画沉积期微幅度古地貌的基础上可以发现高产气井。该方法可以为其他克拉通盆地弱构造变形区沉积期古地貌研究提供有益的思路。

关键词: 沉积期, 古地貌恢复, 构造趋势面, 克拉通盆地, 奥陶系, 马家沟组, 鄂尔多斯盆地

Abstract:

A method for estimation of sedimentary micro-amplitude paleotopography based on structural trend surface conversion has been proposed. This method is suitable for estimating marine sedimentary micro-amplitude paleotopography of weak tectonic deformation zone in a cratonic basin. An assumption is given that multiphase uplifting-subsiding or torsional structural movement in the cratonic basin is manifested as structural trend surface variation, which does not change the pseudostructural amplitudes of local paleotopographic highs and peripheral terrain. Technical procedure of this method is as follows:firstly, calculate pseudostructural amplitude using present-day structural map and its trend surface; secondly, calculate dip direction of sedimentary structural trend surface by approximating the average strike of formation denudation line to the strike of sedimentary structural trend surface; thirdly, according to the idea of uniformitaranism, the average gradient of present-day tidal-flat facies serves as the dip angle of sedimentary structural trend surface; lastly, structural trend surface plus pseudostructural amplitude can obtain the sedimentary paleotopographic map. On this basis in conjunction with petrographic characteristics and dolomitization type of cored wells, distribution scope of each subfacies or microfacies in the marine sedimentary system can be better determined. Application of this method in Lower Ordovician carbonate strata of tidal-flat facies in Submember 5 of Member 5 of Majiagou Formation in the eastern Sulige gas field shows that structural trend surface of the study area is changed from NW-SE to NE-SW, which does not change relative height between sedimentary local paleotopography and peripheral terrain, and that this method is able to effectively depict sedimentary micro-amplitude paleotopography of tidal-flat facies. Subaqueous micro-amplitude paleotopographic uplift during sedimentation period are a key factor controlling the distribution of tidal-flat-facies carbonate grain shoals in this area, while the grain shoals are the most favorable microfacies for late dolomitization and development of high-quality reservoirs. Therefore, high-production gas wells can be discovered on the basis of accurate depiction of sedimentary micro-amplitude paleotopography. This method can provide beneficial ideas for the research on sedimentary paleotopography of weak tectonic deformation zones in other cratonic basins.

Key words: sedimentation period, paleotopographic restoration, structural trend surface, cratonic basin, Ordovician, Majiagou Formation, Ordos Basin

中图分类号:

TE122.14

王建国, 蒋传杰, 常森, 杜孝华, 何顺利, 顾岱鸿. 克拉通盆地微古地貌恢复的构造趋势面转换法[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38(1): 77-83,104.

Wang Jianguo, Jiang Chuanjie, Chang Sen, Du Xiaohua, He Shunli, Gu Daihong. Structural trend surface conversion method for micro-amplitude paleotopographic restoration of cratonic basins[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2017, 38(1): 77-83,104.

参考文献

[1] 王建民,王佳媛,郭德郧,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地东部奥陶系风化壳岩溶古地貌与储层特征[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2013:10-50.
WANG Jianming,WANG Jiayuan,GUO Dexun,et al.Karst landform and reservoir characteristics of Ordovician weathering crust in the eastern part of Ordos Basin[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2013:10-50.
[2] 高白水,金振奎,朱小二,等.哈萨克斯坦扎纳诺尔油田石炭系碳酸盐岩浅滩沉积模式及储层质量差异机理[J].石油学报,2016,37(7):867-877.
GAO Baishui,JIN Zhenkui,ZHU Xiaoer,et al.Sedimentary model and reservoir heterogeneity of Carboniferous carbonate beach in Zanazor,Kazakhstan[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2016,37(7):867-877.
[3] 刘强虎,朱红涛,舒誉,等.珠江口盆地恩平凹陷古近系恩平组物源体系及其对滩坝的控制[J].石油学报,2015,36(3):286-299.
LIU Qianghu,ZHU Hongtao,SHU Yu,et al.Provenance systems and their control on the beach-bar of Paleogene Enping Formation,Enping sag,Pearl River Mouth Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2015,36(3):286-299.
[4] 胡晨林,张元福,姜在兴,等.风浪作用下鄱阳湖现代滨岸滩坝的形态变化[J].石油学报,2015,36(12):1543-1552.
HU Chenlin,ZHANG Yuanfu,JIANG Zaixing,et al.Morphologic changes in modern onshore beach bar of Poyang Lake under wind and wave actions[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2015,36(12):1543-1552.
[5] 张文彪,陈志海,刘志强,等.深水水道形态定量分析及沉积模拟——以西非Gengibre油田为例[J].石油学报,2015,36(1):41-49.
[6] 张繁昌,李灿灿,徐旺林.改进Stockwell变换法识别碳酸盐岩溶洞——以鄂尔多斯盆地奥陶系溶洞发育段为例[J].石油学报,2015,36(2):182-187.
ZHANG Fanchang,LI Cancan,XU Wanglin.Identification of carbonate karst caves using modified Stockwell transform method:a case study of Ordovician karst caves in Ordos Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2015,36(2):182-187.
[7] 董月霞,赵宗举,曹中宏,等.南堡凹陷奥陶系碳酸盐岩岩溶残丘圈闭勘探潜力及意义[J].石油学报,2015,36(6):653-663.
DONG Yuexia,ZHAO Zongju,CAO Zhonghong,et al.Exploration potential and significance of Ordovician carbonate karst monadnock traps in Nanpu sag[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2015,36(6):653-663.
[8] 窦立荣,魏小东,王景春,等.乍得Bongor盆地花岗质基岩潜山储层特征[J].石油学报,2015,36(8):897-904,925.
DOU Lirong,WEI Xiaodong,WANG Jingchun,et al.Characteristics of granitic basement rock buried-hill reservoir in Bongor Basin,Chad[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2015,36(8):897-904,925.
[9] 贾小乐,何登发,童晓光,等.全球大油气田分布特征[J].中国石油勘探,2011,16(3):1-7.
JIA Xiaole,HE Dengfa,TONG Xiaoguang,et al.Distribution of global giant oil and gas fields[J].China Petroleum Exploration,2011,16(3):1-7.
[10] 胡修权,施泽进,田亚铭,等.川东南地区茅口组岩溶古地貌恢复及特征[J].地质通报,2014,33(6):874-881.
HU Xiuquan,SHI Zejin,TIAN Yaming,et al.The restoration of karst ancient landform of the Maokou Formation in southeastern Sichuan Basin[J].Geological Bulletin of China,2014,33(6):874-882.
[11] 刘瑞东,王宝清,王博,等.鄂尔多斯盆地环江地区前侏罗纪古地貌恢复研究[J].石油地质与工程,2014,28(5):9-11.
LIU Ruidong,WANG Baoqing,WANG Bo,et al.Study on pre-Jurassic palaeogeomorphology reconstruction of Huanjiang region,Ordos Basin[J].Petroleum Geology and Engineering,2014,28(5):9-11.
[12] HELLAND-Hansen W,HAMPSON G J.Trajectory analysis:concepts and applications[J].Basin Research,2009,21(5):454-483.
[13] 康波,解习农,杜学斌,等.基于滨线轨迹的古水深定量计算新方法——以古近系沙三中段东营三角洲为例[J].沉积学报,2012,30(3):443-450.
KANG Bo,XIE Xinong,DU Xuebin,et al.A new paleobathymetric approach based on shoreline trajectory:an example from Dongying delta in the third Member of Paleogene Shahejie Formation[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2012,30(3):443-450.
[14] 刘军锷,简晓玲,康波,等.东营凹陷东营三角洲沙三段中亚段古地貌特征及其对沉积的控制[J].油气地质与采收率,2014,21(1):20-23.
LIU Jun'e,JIAN Xiaoling,KANG Bo,et al.Paleogeomorphology of the middle part of 3rd Member of Shahejie Formation and their effects on depositional systems,Dongying delta,Dongying depression[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2014,21(1):20-23.
[15] 康志宏,吴铭东.利用层序地层学恢复岩溶古地貌技术——以塔河油田6区为例[J].新疆地质,2003,21(3):10-15.
KANG Zihong,WU Mingdong.Technology of recovering ancient geomorphy though sequence stratigraphy-a case study in Tahe 6th reservoir,Tarim Basin[J].Xinjiang Geology,2003,21(3):10-15.
[16] 高艺,姜在兴,李俊杰,等.古地貌恢复及其对滩坝沉积的控制作用——以辽河西部凹陷曙北地区沙四段为例[J].油气地质与采收率,2015,22(5):40-46.
GAO Yi,JIANG Zaixing,LI Junjie,et al.Restoration of paleogeomorphology and its controlling effect on deposition of beach-bar sand bodies:a case study of the fourth Member of Shahejie Formation,Shubei area,Liaohe Western sag[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2015,22(5):40-46.
[17] 李家强.层拉平方法在沉积前古地貌恢复中的应用——以济阳坳陷东营三角洲发育区为例[J].油气地球物理,2008,6(2):46-49.
LI Jiaqiang.Application of bedding flattening in the process of rebuilding paleogeomorpholog before basin deposition:a case study in Dongying sag,Jiyang depression[J].Petroleum Geophysics,2008,6(2):46-49.
[18] 林畅松,杨海军,刘景彦,等.塔里木盆地古生代中央隆起带古构造地貌及其对沉积相发育分布的制约[J].中国科学D辑:地球科学,2009,39(3):306-316.
LIN Changsong,YANG Haijun,LIU Jingyan,et al.Paleostructural geomorphology of the paleozoic central uplift belt and its constraint on the development of depositional facies in the Tarim Basin[J].Science in China Series D:Earth Sciences,2009,52(6):823-834.
[19] 李源,鲁新便,蔡忠贤,等.塔河油田海西早期古水文地貌特征及其对洞穴发育的控制[J].石油学报,2016,37(8):1011-1020.
LI Yuan,LU Xinbian,CAI Zhongxian,et al.Hydrogeomorphologic characteristics and its controlling caves in Hercynian,Tahe oilfield[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2016,37(8):1011-1020.
[20] 陈树光,任建业,吴峰,等.渤中坳陷沙北地区古地貌恢复及其应用[J].特种油气藏,2015,22(2):52-55.
CHEN Shuguang,REN Jianye,WU Feng,et al.Palaeogeomorphic recovery and its application in Shabei area,central Bohai depression[J].Special Oil and Gas Reservoir,2015,22(2):52-55.
[21] 赵重远,靳久强.含油气盆地地质学[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2011:25-45.
ZHAO Chongyuan,JIN Jiuqiang.Geology of petroliferous basins[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2011:25-45.
[22] 莱顿.内克拉通盆地[M].刘里斌,译.北京:石油工业出版社,2000:80-100.
LEIGHTON M W.Interior cratonic basins[M].Translated by LIU Libin.Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2000:80-100.
[23] 夏东兴.海岸带地貌环境及其演化[M].北京:海洋出版社,2009:70-90.
XIA Dongxing.Coastal zone landform environment and its evolution[M].Beijing:China Ocean Press,2009:70-90.
[24] 徐茂泉,陈友飞.海洋地质学[M].2版.厦门:厦门大学出版社,2010:50-80.
XU Maoquan,CHEN Youfei.Marine geology[M].2nd ed.Xiamen:Xiamen University Press,2010:50-80.
[25] 严钦尚,曾昭璇.地貌学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,1985:20-40.
YAN Qinshang,ZENG Zhaoxuan.Geomorphology[M].Beijing:Higher Education Press,1985:20-40.
[26] 白玉宝,孙东胜.离石断裂带构造特征及演化[J].石油与天然气地质,1996,17(1):77-80.
BAI Yubao,SUN Dongsheng.Structural feature and evolution of Lishi fractural zone[J].Oil & Gas Geology,1996,17(1):77-80.
[27] 王锋,刘池洋,赵红格.鄂尔多斯地块西部南北向拆离滑覆构造[J].地球科学与环境学报,2004,26(1):17-20.
WANG Feng,LIU Chiyang,ZHAO Hongge.South-north trending detachment structures in the western Ordos block[J].Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment,2004,26(1):17-20.
[28] 刘正宏,徐仲元,杨振升,等.鄂尔多斯北缘石合拉沟逆冲推覆构造的发现及意义[J].地质调查与研究,2004,27(1):24-27.
LIU Zhenghong,XU Zhongyuan,YANG Zhensheng,et al.Discovery of Shihelagou thrust nappe and its geological significance[J].Geological Survey and Research,2004,27(1):24-27.
[29] 王贵玲,刘志明,蔺文静.鄂尔多斯周缘地质构造对地热资源形成的控制作用[J].地质学报,2004,78(1):44-51.
WANG Guilin,LIU Zhiming,LIN Wenjing.Tectonic control of geothermal resources in the peripheral of Ordos Basin[J].Acta Geologica Sinica,2004,78(1):44-51.
[30] 徐黎明,周立发,张义楷,等.鄂尔多斯盆地构造应力场特征及其构造背景[J].大地构造与成矿学,2006,30(4):455-462.
XU Liming,ZHOU Lifa,ZHANG Yikai,et al.Characteristics and tectonic setting of tectono-stress field of Ordos Basin[J].Geotectonica et Metallogenia,2006,30(4):455-462.
[31] 冯增昭,鲍志东.鄂尔多斯奥陶纪马家沟期岩相古地理[J].沉积学报,1999,17(1):1-8.
FENG Zengzhao,BAO Zhidong.Lithofacies paleogeography of Majiagou age of Ordovician in Ordos Basin[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,1999,17(1):1-8.
[32] 谢锦龙,吴兴宁,孙六一,等.鄂尔多斯盆地奥陶系马家沟组五段岩相古地理及有利区带预测[J].海相油气地质,2013,18(4):23-32.
XIE Jinlong,WU Xingning,SUN Liuyi,et al.Lithofacies palaeogeography and potential zone prediction of Ordovician Majiagou member-5 in Ordos Basin[J].Marine Origin Petroleum Geology,2013,18(4):23-32.
[33] 张宪旭,杨光明,蔡文芮,等.煤层下部地层地震成像研究[J].煤田地质与勘探,2015,43(2):83-85.
ZHANG Xianxu,YANG Guangming,CAI Wenrui,et al.Research on seismic imaging of the lower part of coal seam[J].Coal Geology & Exploration,2015,43(2):83-85.

克拉通盆地微古地貌恢复的构造趋势面转换法

Structural trend surface conversion method for micro-amplitude paleotopographic restoration of cratonic basins

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	侯连华, 米敬奎, 罗霞, 于志超, 林森虎, 廖凤荣, 庞正炼, 赵忠英. 压力对页岩原位加热产出油气特征的影响——以鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组7段3亚段页岩为例[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(4): 629-641.
[2]	何永宏, 李桢, 樊建明, 张超, 张旭泽, 马兵. 鄂尔多斯盆地页岩油开发井网优化技术及实践——以庆城油田为例[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(4): 683-697.
[3]	席胜利, 闫伟, 刘新社, 张才利, 殷亮亮, 董国栋, 井向辉, 魏柳斌. 鄂尔多斯盆地天然气勘探新领域、新类型及资源潜力[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(1): 33-51,132.
[4]	郭秋麟, 黄少英, 卢玉红, 王建, 吴晓智, 陈宁生. 塔里木盆地台盆区下古生界油气系统模拟及资源分布预测[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(9): 1459-1471.
[5]	牛小兵, 赵伟波, 史云鹤, 胡新友, 杜小伟. 鄂尔多斯盆地本溪组天然气成藏条件及勘探潜力[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(8): 1240-1257.
[6]	魏迎春, 孟涛, 张劲, 王安民, 王亚东. 不同煤体结构煤储层与煤层气井产出煤粉特征的关系——以鄂尔多斯盆地东缘柳林区块为例[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(6): 1000-1014.
[7]	席胜利, 李明瑞, 赵伟波, 付勋勋, 祖凯, 赵小会, 刘晓鹏, 裴文超, 高星, 周国晓, 陈娟萍. 鄂尔多斯盆地横山大型气田成藏条件及勘探开发关键技术[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(6): 1015-1028.
[8]	李斌, 姜潇俊, 赵星星, 邬光辉, 韩剑发, 刘强, 汪如军. 塔里木盆地台盆过渡带多相态油气藏成因及差异富集模式——以玉科地区奥陶系为例[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(5): 794-808.
[9]	余浩杰, 王振嘉, 李进步, 朱亚军. 鄂尔多斯盆地长庆气区复杂致密砂岩气藏开发关键技术进展及攻关方向[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(4): 698-712.
[10]	李明瑞, 侯云超, 谢先奎, 张忠义, 张晓磊, 罗丽荣, 邵晓州, 薛楠. 鄂尔多斯盆地平凉—演武地区三叠系延长组油气成藏模式及勘探前景[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(3): 433-446.
[11]	席胜利, 魏嘉怡, 张才利, 王红伟, 井向辉, 杨亚娟, 刘刚, 李涵, 张艳. 鄂尔多斯盆地海相页岩油勘探发现及意义[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(2): 253-269.
[12]	刘显阳, 李士祥, 周新平, 陈修, 刘江艳, 郭芪恒, 魏嘉怡, 廖永乐. 鄂尔多斯盆地石油勘探新领域、新类型及资源潜力[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(12): 2070-2090.
[13]	徐凤银, 王成旺, 熊先钺, 徐博瑞, 王红娜, 赵欣, 江山, 宋伟, 王玉斌, 陈高杰, 吴鹏, 赵靖舟. 鄂尔多斯盆地东缘深部煤层气成藏演化规律与勘探开发实践[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(11): 1764-1780.
[14]	熊先钺, 闫霞, 徐凤银, 李曙光, 聂志宏, 冯延青, 刘莹, 陈明, 孙俊义, 周科, 李春虎. 深部煤层气多要素耦合控制机理、解吸规律与开发效果剖析[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(11): 1812-1826,1853.
[15]	刘建忠, 朱光辉, 刘彦成, 晁巍巍, 杜佳, 杨琦, 米洪刚, 张守仁. 鄂尔多斯盆地东缘深部煤层气勘探突破及未来面临的挑战与对策——以临兴—神府区块为例[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(11): 1827-1839.