致密砂岩多段分簇压裂中孔隙压力场对多裂缝扩展的影响

doi:10.7623/syxb201707010

石油学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (7): 830-839.DOI: 10.7623/syxb201707010

致密砂岩多段分簇压裂中孔隙压力场对多裂缝扩展的影响

周大伟, 张广清, 刘志斌, 董昊然

中国石油大学石油工程学院北京 102249

收稿日期:2016-08-13 修回日期:2017-04-28 出版日期:2017-07-25 发布日期:2017-08-10
通讯作者: 张广清,男,1975年7月生,1996年获石油大学(华东)学士学位,2002年获石油大学(北京)博士学位,现为中国石油大学(北京)教授、博士生导师,主要从事石油工程岩石力学与岩土工程的研究。Email:zhangguangqing@cup.edu.cn
作者简介:周大伟,男,1988年10月生,2013年获中国石油大学(华东)学士学位,现为中国石油大学(北京)博士研究生,主要从事石油工程岩石力学研究。Email:zhoudawei_petro@126.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金优秀青年科学基金项目（No.51322404）资助。

Influences of pore-pressure field on multi-fracture propagation during the multi-stage cluster fracturing of tight sandstone

Zhou Dawei, Zhang Guangqing, Liu Zhibin, Dong Haoran

College of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China

Received:2016-08-13 Revised:2017-04-28 Online:2017-07-25 Published:2017-08-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为了研究致密砂岩多段分簇压裂中孔隙压力场对多裂缝扩展的影响，采用300 mm×300 mm×600 mm天然砂岩进行真三轴水力压裂实验，实验过程中采用2套压裂液注入系统分别独立控制2条水力裂缝，实验后将试件连续切片分析实验结果，同时采用三维流固耦合数值模拟方法研究孔隙压力场对水力裂缝扩展的影响。结果表明：在致密砂岩压裂中，由于孔隙压力场的存在，无论是簇内裂缝还是簇间裂缝扩展，当缝间距与裂缝半长的比值较小时，裂缝之间表现为相互吸引；当缝间距与裂缝半长的比值较大时，裂缝之间的相互影响较弱，多裂缝之间未出现相互排斥现象；除缝内净压力、缝间距、应力差外，裂缝周围孔隙压力场也是影响多裂缝扩展的重要因素；孔隙压力的增大减小了有效应力，岩石更容易发生剪切破坏，从而加速了裂缝的非平面、非对称双翼扩展；现场致密砂岩多段分簇压裂应增大簇间和簇内射孔间距，可避免压裂液滤失导致裂缝长度的减小，增大储层的改造体积。

关键词: 多段分簇射孔压裂, 多裂缝扩展, 相互吸引, 孔隙压力场, 致密砂岩

Abstract:

To study the influences of pore-pressure field on multi-fracture propagation during the multi-stage cluster fracturing of tight sandstone, the natural sandstones of 300 mm×300 mm×600 mm were used for true tri-axial hydraulic fracturing experiment. In the experiment process, two sets of fracturing fluid pumping system were employed to independently control two hydraulic fractures. After the experiment, the specimens were sliced consecutively to analyze the experimental results. Meanwhile, the 3D coupled fluid-solid numerical simulation method was developed to study the influences of pore-pressure field on hydraulic fracture propagation. The results show that because of the existence of pore-pressure field in the fracturing process of tight sandstone, when the ratio of fracture spacing to fracture half-length is small, the fractures show mutual attraction when intra-cluster fracture or inter-cluster fracture are expanded. When the ratio of fracture spacing to fracture half-length is large, the interaction between fractures is weak, and no rejection occurs among multi-fractures. Beside intra-fracture net pressure, fracture spacing and stress difference, the pore-pressure field around fractures also plays a vital role in affecting multi-fracture propagation. The increase of pore pressure can reduce the effective stress, and thus is more likely to cause rock shear failures in sandstone; meanwhile, the non-planar and asymmetric bi-wing fracture expansion is accelarated. For the multi-stage cluster fracturing of tight sandstone, the inter-cluster and intra-cluster perforation spacing should be increased to avoid the reduction of fracture length caused by the filtration of fracturing fluid and increase the reservoir reformation volume.

Key words: multi-stage cluster perforation fracturing, multi-fractures propagation, mutual attraction, pore-pressure field, tight sandstone

中图分类号:

TE357

周大伟, 张广清, 刘志斌, 董昊然. 致密砂岩多段分簇压裂中孔隙压力场对多裂缝扩展的影响[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38(7): 830-839.

Zhou Dawei, Zhang Guangqing, Liu Zhibin, Dong Haoran. Influences of pore-pressure field on multi-fracture propagation during the multi-stage cluster fracturing of tight sandstone[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2017, 38(7): 830-839.

参考文献

[1] 赵金洲,彭瑀,林啸,等.考虑复杂应力分布的数值缝宽计算模型及其应用[J].石油学报,2016,37(7):914-920.
ZHAO Jinzhou,PENG Yu,LIN Xiao,et al.Numerical fracture width model considering complex stress distribution and its application[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2016,37(7):914-920.
[2] SOLIMAN M Y,HUNT J L,RABAA A M E.Fracturing aspects of horizontal wells[J].Journal of Petroleum Technology,1990,42(8):966-973.
[3] EL RABAA W.Experimental study of hydraulic fracture geometry initiated from horizontal wells[R].SPE 19720,1989.
[4] ZHOU Dawei,ZHANG Guangqing,ZHAO Bo,et al.Experimental investigation on non-planar fractures mechanisms in hydraulic fracturing[J].Journal of Unconventional Oil and Gas Resources,2016,15:106-112.
[5] CROSBY D G,YANG Z,RAHMAN S S.Methodology to predict the initiation of multiple transverse fractures from horizontal wellbores[J].Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology,2001,40(10),doi:10.2118/01-10-04.
[6] CROSBY D G,RAHMAN M M,RAHMAN M K,et al.Single and multiple transverse fracture initiation from horizontal wells[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,2002,35(3/4):191-204.
[7] BUNGER A P,JEFFREY R G,KEAR J,et al.Experimental investigation of the interaction among closely spaced hydraulic fractures:45th U.S.Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium,San Francisco,California,26-29 June,2011[C].San Francisco:American Rock Mechanics Association,2011.
[8] FAN Tiegang,ZHANG Guangqing.Laboratory investigation of hydraulic fracture networks in formations with continuous orthogonal fractures[J].Energy,2014,74:164-173.
[9] DANESHY A A,AU-YEUNG J,THOMPSON T,et al.Fracture shadowing:a direct method for determination of the reach and propagation pattern of hydraulic fractures in horizontal wells[R].SPE 151980,2012.
[10] DANESHY A A.Off-balance growth:a new concept in hydraulic fracturing[J].Journal of Petroleum Technology,2003,55(4):78-85.
[11] WENG Xiaowei.Fracture initiation and propagation from deviated wellbores[R].SPE 26597,1993.
[12] BUNGER A P,ZHANG Xi,JEFFREY R G.Parameters affecting the interaction among closely spaced hydraulic fractures[J].SPE Journal,2012,17(1):292-306.
[13] OLSON J,POLLARD D D.Inferring paleostresses from natural fracture patterns:a new method[J].Geology,1989,17(4):345-348.
[14] DANESHY A A.Dynamic interaction within multiple limited entry fractures in horizontal wells:theory,implications,and field verification[R].SPE 173344,2015.
[15] PEIRCE A,BUNGER A.Interference fracturing:nonuniform distributions of perforation clusters that promote simultaneous growth of multiple hydraulic fractures[J].SPE Journal,2014,20(2):384-395.
[16] Germanovich L N,Ring L M,Astakhov D K,et al.Hydraulic fracture with multiple segments Ⅱ.Modeling[J].International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences,1997,34(3):98.
[17] Fisher M K,Heinze J R,Harris C D,et al.Optimizing horizontal completion techniques in the Barnett shale using microseismic fracture mapping[R].SPE 90051,2004.
[18] CLEARY M P,WRIGHT C A,Wright T B.Experimental and modeling evidence for major changes in hydraulic fracturing design and field procedures[R].SPE 21494,1991.
[19] CLEARY M P.Comprehensive design formulae for hydraulic fracturing[R].SPE 9259,1980.
[20] 曾青冬,姚军.水平井多裂缝同步扩展数值模拟[J].石油学报,2015,36(12):1571-1579.
ZENG Qingdong,YAO Jun.Numerical simulation of multiple fractures simultaneous propagation in horizontal wells[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2015,36(12):1571-1579.
[21] 李连崇,梁正召,李根,等.水力压裂裂缝穿层及扭转扩展的三维模拟分析[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2010,29(S1):3208-3215.
LI Lianchong,LIANG Zhengzhao,LI Gen,et al.Three-dimensional numerical analysis of traversing and twisted fractures in hydraulic fracturing[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2010,29(S1):3208-3215.
[22] 朱如凯,吴松涛,苏玲,等.中国致密储层孔隙结构表征需注意的问题及未来发展方向[J].石油学报,2016,37(11):1323-1336.
ZHU Rukai,WU Songtao,SU Ling,et al.Problem sand future works of porous texture characterization of tight reservoirs in China[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2016,37(11):1323-1336.
[23] 刘震,孙迪,李潍莲,等.沉积盆地地层孔隙动力学研究进展[J].石油学报,2016,37(10):1193-1215.
LIU Zhen,SUN Di,LI Weilian,et al.Advances in research on stratigraphic poro dynamics of sedimentary basins[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2016,37(10):1193-1215.
[24] MCTIGUE D F.Flow to a heated borehole in porous,thermoelastic rock:Analysis[J].Water Resources Research, 1990,26(8):1763-1774.
[25] GHASSEMI A,ZHANG Q.A transient fictitious stress boundary element method for porothermoelastic media[J].Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements,2004,28(11):1363-1373.
[26] 张广清,陈勉,赵艳波.新井定向射孔转向压裂裂缝起裂与延伸机理研究[J].石油学报,2008,29(1):116-119.
ZHANG Guangqing,CHEN Mian,ZHAO Yanbo.Study on initiation and propagation mechanism of fractures in oriented perforation of new wells[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2008,29(1):116-119.
[27] XUE W,GHASSEMI A.Poroelastic analysis of hydraulic fracture propagation:43rd U.S.Rock Mechanics Symposium & 4th U.S.-Canada Rock Mechanics Symposium,Asheville,North Carolina,28 June-1 July,2009.Asheville:American Rock Mechanics Association,2009.
[28] 赵益忠,程远方,曲连忠,等.水力压裂动态造缝的有限元模拟[J].石油学报,2007,28(6):103-106.
ZHAO Yizhong,CHENG Yuanfang,QU Lianzhong,et al.Finite element simulation of dynamic fracture in hydraulic fracturing[J]Acta Petrolei Sinica,2007,28(6):103-106.
[29] SARRIS E,PAPANASTASIOU P C.Modelling of hydraulic fracturing in a weak permeable formation[R].SPE 151706,2012.
[30] WANG Hanyi,MARONGIU-PORCU M,ECONOMIDES M J.Poroelastic versus poroplastic modeling of hydraulic fracturing[R].SPE 168600,2014.
[31] LUBINSKI A.Theory of elasticity for porous bodies displaying a strong pore structure[C]//Proceedings of Second U.S.National Congress of Applied Mechanics.Ann Arbor,MI:The American Society of Mechanical Engineers,1954:247-256.
[32] PERKINS T K,GONZALEZ J A.The effect of thermoelastic stresses on injection well fracturing[J].Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal,1985,25(1):78-88.
[33] CLEARY J M.Hydraulic fracture theory:part I.Mechanics of materials[R].Urbana,Ill.:State of Illinois,Dept.of Registration and Education,Division of the State Geological Survey,1958.
[34] SNEDDON I N.The distribution of stress in the neighbourhood of a crack in an elastic solid[J].Proceedings of the Royal Society A,1946,187(1009):229-260.
[35] MAYERHOFER M J,LOLON E P,YOUNGBLOOD J E,et al.Integration of microseismic-fracture-mapping results with numerical fracture network production modeling in the Barnett shale[R].SPE 102103,2006.
[36] MAYERHOFER M J,LOLON E,WARPINSKI N R,et al.What is stimulated reservoir volume?[J].SPE Production & Operations,2010,25(1):89-98.

致密砂岩多段分簇压裂中孔隙压力场对多裂缝扩展的影响

Influences of pore-pressure field on multi-fracture propagation during the multi-stage cluster fracturing of tight sandstone

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	赵玉龙, 刘香禺, 张烈辉, 吴婷婷, 单保超. 粗糙孔壁对微/纳米尺度下致密砂岩气流动的影响[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(5): 641-653.
[2]	胡勇, 李熙喆, 徐轩, 梅青燕, 陈颖莉, 王继平, 焦春艳, 郭长敏, 贾玉泽. 含水致密砂岩气藏可动用储量评价新方法及其应用[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(3): 332-340.
[3]	黄兴, 倪军, 李响, 薛俊杰, 柏明星, 周彤. 致密油藏不同微观孔隙结构储层CO₂驱动用特征及影响因素[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(7): 853-864.
[4]	曾联波, 刘国平, 朱如凯, 高志勇, 巩磊, 吕文雅. 库车前陆盆地深层致密砂岩储层构造成岩强度的定量评价方法[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(12): 1601-1609.
[5]	张莉, 王威, 舒志国, 郝芳, 邹华耀, 杨烁. 川东北元坝地区须家河组钙质交代—胶结致密层分布与成因[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(6): 692-705.
[6]	李潮流, 胡法龙, 袁超, 李霞, 李长喜, 刘学锋. 利用核磁共振与常规测井联合反演确定致密储层多矿物组分[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(9): 1019-1027.
[7]	李易隆, 贾爱林, 冀光, 郭建林, 王国亭, 郭智, 张吉. 鄂尔多斯盆地中-东部下石盒子组八段辫状河储层构型[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(9): 1037-1050.
[8]	彭军, 韩浩东, 夏青松, 李斌. 深埋藏致密砂岩储层微观孔隙结构的分形表征及成因机理——以塔里木盆地顺托果勒地区柯坪塔格组为例[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(7): 775-791.
[9]	鲁雪松, 赵孟军, 刘可禹, 卓勤功, 范俊佳, 于志超, 公言杰. 库车前陆盆地深层高效致密砂岩气藏形成条件与机理[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(4): 365-378.
[10]	操应长, 葸克来, 刘可禹, 朱如凯, 远光辉, 张响响, 宋明水. 陆相湖盆致密砂岩油气储层储集性能表征与成储机制——以松辽盆地南部下白垩统泉头组四段为例[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(3): 247-265.
[11]	郭建林, 郭智, 崔永平, 孟德伟, 王国亭, 冀光, 程立华, 孙盈盈, 贾成业. 大型致密砂岩气田采收率计算方法[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(12): 1389-1396.
[12]	刘景东, 蒋有录, 张园园, 徐田武, 慕小水, 万涛. 东濮凹陷古近系致密砂岩气成因与充注差异[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38(9): 1010-1020.
[13]	吴浩, 张春林, 纪友亮, 刘锐娥, 曹尚, 陈胜, 张云钊, 王晔, 杜威, 刘刚. 致密砂岩孔喉大小表征及对储层物性的控制——以鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区延长组为例[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38(8): 876-887.
[14]	房涛, 张立宽, 刘乃贵, 张立强, 王为民, 于岚, 李超, 雷裕红. 核磁共振技术定量表征致密砂岩气储层孔隙结构——以临清坳陷东部石炭系—二叠系致密砂岩储层为例[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38(8): 902-915.
[15]	张建坤, 吴吉忠, 徐文会, 吴开龙, 臧梅, 邢文军. 基于岩石物理的致密砂岩油藏叠前优势储层预测——以渤海湾盆地南堡凹陷4号构造东营组二段为例[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38(7): 793-803.