东濮凹陷古近系致密砂岩气成因与充注差异

doi:10.7623/syxb201709003

石油学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (9): 1010-1020.DOI: 10.7623/syxb201709003

东濮凹陷古近系致密砂岩气成因与充注差异

刘景东¹, 蒋有录¹, 张园园¹, 徐田武², 慕小水², 万涛²

1. 中国石油大学地球科学与技术学院山东青岛 266580;
2. 中国石油化工股份有限公司中原油田分公司勘探开发研究院河南濮阳 457001

收稿日期:2016-12-20 修回日期:2017-05-27 出版日期:2017-09-25 发布日期:2017-10-09
通讯作者: 刘景东,男,1984年9月生,2006年获中国石油大学(华东)学士学位,2011年获中国石油大学(华东)博士学位,现为中国石油大学(华东)地球科学与技术学院讲师,主要从事油气地质与勘探方面的教学与科研工作。Email:ljd840911@126.com
作者简介:刘景东,男,1984年9月生,2006年获中国石油大学(华东)学士学位,2011年获中国石油大学(华东)博士学位,现为中国石油大学(华东)地球科学与技术学院讲师,主要从事油气地质与勘探方面的教学与科研工作。Email:ljd840911@126.com
基金资助:
国家重大科技专项（2016ZX05006-007）资助。

Genesis and charge difference of Paleogene tight sandstone gas in Dongpu sag

Liu Jingdong¹, Jiang Youlu¹, Zhang Yuanyuan¹, Xu Tianwu², Mu Xiaoshui², Wan Tao²

1. School of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum, Shandong Qingdao 266580, China;
2. Exploration and Development Research Institute, Sinopec Zhongyuan Oilfield Company, Henan Puyang 457001, China

Received:2016-12-20 Revised:2017-05-27 Online:2017-09-25 Published:2017-10-09

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

中国东部深层古近系致密砂岩气是今后油气勘探的重要接替领域。以东濮凹陷深层古近系致密砂岩气为例，根据天然气组分、碳同位素及储层沥青等分析了天然气成因，从储层致密化及油气充注期等方面，研究了深层洼陷带、斜坡带致密砂岩气充注差异，并划分了气藏成因类型。结果表明，东濮凹陷洼陷带以腐泥型干酪根裂解气为主，并混有原油裂解气，储层在东营组沉积期和明化镇组沉积中期均演化为致密储层，普遍存在东营组沉积中后期—东营组抬升初期、明化镇组沉积后期—第四纪2期油气充注；东濮凹陷斜坡带以原油裂解气为主，储层在明化镇组沉积中期演化为致密储层，以东营组沉积中后期—东营组抬升初期油气充注为主。根据天然气成因、储层致密化进程及其与油气充注期的关系，将东濮凹陷深层古近系致密砂岩气藏划分为2种成因类型：洼陷带2期致密混合型气藏，斜坡带晚期致密原油裂解型气藏。

关键词: 致密砂岩, 天然气成因, 天然气充注, 古近系, 东濮凹陷

Abstract:

Deep Paleogene tight sandstone gas in eastern China is the important substitute area for oil and gas exploration. Taking the deep Paleogene tight sandstone gas of Dongpu sag as an example, the natural gas genesis is analyzed according to natural gas composition, carbon isotope and reservoir bitumen. Then the charging differences of tight sandstone gas between deep sag zone and slope zone are studied in terms of reservoir densification, and hydrocarbon charging stage, etc., and the genetic types of gas reservoir are also divided. The results show that the sag zone of Dongpu sag is dominated by sapropel-kerogen pyrolysis gas, mixed with oil cracking gas. The tight reservoir was formed in Dongying period and middle Minghuazhen period, and this zone commonly underwent two hydrocarbon-charging stages, i.e., the mid-late Dongying sag period-the early Dongying uplift period and the late Minghuazhen deposition period-the Quaternary. The slope zone of Dongpu sag is dominated by oil cracking gas, and the tight reservoir was formed in middle Minghuazhen period, and mainly experienced the hydrocarbon charging in the mid-late Dongying sag period-the early Dongying uplift period. According to natural gas genesis, reservoir densification process and its relationship to hydrocarbon charging stage, the deep Paleogene tight sandstone gas reservoir in Dongpu sag is classified into two genetic types, i.e., dual-stage mixed tight reservoir in sag zone and the late oil-cracking gas reservoir in slope zone.

Key words: tight sandstone, natural gas genesis, natural gas charging, Paleogene, Dongpu sag

中图分类号:

TE122

刘景东, 蒋有录, 张园园, 徐田武, 慕小水, 万涛. 东濮凹陷古近系致密砂岩气成因与充注差异[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38(9): 1010-1020.

Liu Jingdong, Jiang Youlu, Zhang Yuanyuan, Xu Tianwu, Mu Xiaoshui, Wan Tao. Genesis and charge difference of Paleogene tight sandstone gas in Dongpu sag[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2017, 38(9): 1010-1020.

参考文献

[1] 戴金星,倪云燕,吴小奇. 中国致密砂岩气及在勘探开发上的重要意义[J].石油勘探与开发,2012,39(3):257-264.
DAI Jinxing,NI Yunyan,WU Xiaoqi.Tight gas in China and its significance in exploration and exploitation[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2012,39(3):257-264.
[2] 李建忠,郑民,陈晓明,等.非常规油气内涵辨析、源-储组合类型及中国非常规油气发展潜力[J].石油学报,2015,36(5):521-532.
LI Jianzhong,ZHENG Min,CHEN Xiaoming,et al.Connotation analyses,source-reservoir assemblage types and development potential of unconventional hydrocarbon in China[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2015,36(5):521-532.
[3] 姜振学,李峰,杨海军,等.库车坳陷迪北地区侏罗系致密储层裂缝发育特征及控藏模式[J].石油学报,2015,36(增刊2):102-111.
JIANG Zhenxue,LI Feng,YANG Haijun,et al.Development characteristics of fractures in Jurassic tight reservoir in Dibei area of Kuqa depression and its reservoir-controlling mode[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2015,36(S2):102-111.
[4] 叶素娟,李嵘,杨克明,等.川西坳陷叠覆型致密砂岩气区储层特征及定量预测评价[J].石油学报,2015,36(12):1484-1494.
YE Sujuan,LI Rong,YANG Keming,et al.Characteristics and quantitative prediction of tight sand gas reservoirs in superimposed tight sandstone gas-bearing area,western Sichuan depression[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2015,36(12):1484-1494.
[5] MASTERS J A.Deep basin gas trap,western Canada[J].AAPG Bulletin,1979,63(2):152-181.
[6] LAW B E.Basin-centered gas systems[J].AAPG Bulletin,2002,86(11):1891-1919.
[7] SCHMOKER J W.Method for assessing continuous-type (unconventional)hydrocarbon accumulations[C]//GAUTIER D L,DOLTON G I,TAKAHASHI K T,et al.National Assessment of United States Oil And Gas Resources-Results,Methodology,and Supporting Data.U.S.Geological Survey Digital Data Series DDS-30,Colorado:U.S.Geological Survey,1995.
[8] 邹才能,陶士振,袁选俊,等.连续型油气藏形成条件与分布特征[J].石油学报,2009,30(3):324-331.
ZOU Caineng,TAO Shizhen,YUAN Xuanjun,et al.The formation conditions and distribution characteristics of continuous petroleum accumulations[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2009,30(3):324-331.
[9] 张金川.从"深盆气"到"根缘气"[J].天然气工业,2006,26(2):46-48.
ZHANG Jinchuan.Source-contacting gas:derived from deep basin gas or basin-centered gas[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2006,26(2):46-48.
[10] 赵靖舟,付金华,姚泾利,等.鄂尔多斯盆地准连续型致密砂岩大气田成藏模式[J].石油学报,2012,33(增刊1):37-52.
ZHAO Jingzhou,FU Jinhua,YAO Jingli,et al.Quasi-continuous accumulation model of large tight sandstone gas field in Ordos Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2012,33(S1):37-52.
[11] 张金川,金之钧,袁明生,等.油气成藏与分布的递变序列[J].现代地质,2003,17(3):323-330.
ZHANG Jinchuan,JIN Zhijun,YUAN Mingsheng,et al.Mechanic spectrum for the migration and accumulation of hydrocarbons[J].Geoscience,2003,17(3):323-330.
[12] 聂海宽,张金川,薛会,等.油气成藏及分布序列的连续聚集和非连续聚集[J].天然气工业,2010,30(9):9-14.
NIE Haikuan,ZHANG Jinchuan,XUE Hui,et al.Continuous and discontinuous accumulations in hydrocarbon pooling and distribution sequence[J].Natural Gas Industry,2010,30(9):9-14.
[13] 邹才能,陶士振,侯连华,等.非常规油气地质学[M].北京:地质出版社,2014.
ZOU Caineng,TAO Shizhen,HOU Lianhua,et al.Unconventional petroleum geology[M].Beijing:Geological Publishing House,2014.
[14] 姜振学,林世国,庞雄奇,等.两种类型致密砂岩气藏对比[J].石油实验地质,2006,28(3):210-214.
JIANG Zhenxue,LIN Shiguo,PANG Xiongqi,et al.The comparison of two types of tight sand gas reservoir[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2006,28(3):210-214.
[15] 董晓霞,梅廉夫,全永旺.致密砂岩气藏的类型和勘探前景[J].天然气地球科学,2007,18(3):351-355.
DONG Xiaoxia,MEI Lianfu,QUAN Yongwang.Types of tight sand gas accumulation and its exploration prospect[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2007,18(3):351-355.
[16] 李剑,魏国齐,谢增业,等.中国致密砂岩大气田成藏机理与主控因素——以鄂尔多斯盆地和四川盆地为例[J].石油学报,2013,34(增刊1):14-28.
LI Jian,WEI Guoqi,XIE Zengye,et al.Accumulation mechanism and main controlling factors of large tight sandstone gas fields in China:cases study on Ordos Basin and Sichuan Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2013,34(S1):14-28.
[17] 苏惠,曲丽萍,李桂霞,等.东濮凹陷平衡剖面与构造演化研究[J].石油地球物理勘探,2000,35(4):469-478.
SU Hui,QU Liping,LI Guixia,et al.Balanced section and tectonic evolution in the Dongpu depression[J].Oil Geophysical Prospecting,2000,35(4):469-478.
[18] 高红灿,郑荣才,肖应凯,等.渤海湾盆地东濮凹陷古近系沙河街组盐岩成因——来自沉积学和地球化学的证据[J].石油学报,2015,36(1):19-32.
GAO Hongcan,ZHENG Rongcai,XIAO Yingkai,et al.Origin of the salt rock of Paleogene Shahejie Formation in Dongpu sag,Bohai Bay Basin:evidences from sedimentology and geochemistry[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2015,36(1):19-32.
[19] 刘景东,蒋有录.东濮凹陷北部地区古近系烃源岩热演化特征及其主控因素[J].中国地质,2013,40(2):498-507.
LIU Jingdong,JIANG Youlu.Thermal evolution characteristics of Paleogene source rocks and their main controlling factors in northern part of Dongpu depression[J].Geology in China,2013,40(2):498-507.
[20] 鲁雪松,蒋有录,常振恒,等.东濮凹陷东营组地层剥蚀厚度估算及其意义[J].地质科技情报,2007,26(2):8-12.
LU Xuesong,JIANG Youlu,CHANG Zhenheng,et al.Calculation of the erosion thickness of Dongying Formation in Dongpu depression and its significance[J].Geological Science and Technology Information,2007,26(2):8-12.
[21] 朱炎铭,王晓辉,张聪,等.东濮凹陷石炭-二叠系煤系烃源岩的生烃演化[J].石油学报,2007,28(6):27-31.
ZHU Yanming,WANG Xiaohui,ZHANG Cong,et al.Hydrocarbon-generation evolution of the Permo-Carboniferous coal measure in Dongpu depression[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2007,28(6):27-31.
[22] 许化政,周新科.东濮凹陷文留气藏天然气成因与成藏史分析[J].石油勘探与开发,2005,32(4):118-124.
XU Huazheng,ZHOU Xinke.Gas genesis and accumulation history of Wenliu gas pool in Dongpu sag,center China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2005,32(4):118-124.
[23] 戴金星,秦胜飞,陶士振,等.中国天然气工业发展趋势和天然气地学理论重要进展[J].天然气地球科学,2005,16(2):127-142.
DAI Jinxing,QIN Shengfei,TAO Shizhen,et al.Developing trends of natural gas industry and the significant progress on natural gas geological theories in China[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2005,16(2):127-142.
[24] PRINZHOFER A A,HUC A Y.Genetic and post-genetic molecular and isotopic fractionations in natural gases[J].Chemical Geology,1995,126(3/4):281-290.
[25] 远光辉,操应长,杨田,等.论碎屑岩储层成岩过程中有机酸的溶蚀增孔能力[J].地学前缘,2013,20(5):207-219.
YUAN Guanghui,CAO Yingchang,YANG Tian,et al.Porosity enhancement potential through mineral dissolution by organic acids in the diagenetic process of clastic reservoir[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2013,20(5):207-219.
[26] BARKER C.Calculated volume and pressure changes during the thermal cracking of oil to gas in reservoir[J].AAPG Bulletin,1990,74(8):1254-1261.
[27] HUNT J M.Petroleum geochemistry and geology[M].2nd ed.New York:W.H.Freeman and Company,1996.
[28] 蒋有录,房磊,谈玉明,等.渤海湾盆地东濮凹陷不同区带油气成藏期差异性及主控因素[J].地质论评,2015,61(6):1321-1331.
JIANG Youlu,FANG Lei,TAN Yuming,et al.Differences and main controlling factors of accumulation periods in Dongpu sag,Bohai Bay Basin[J].Geological Review,2015,61(6):1321-1331.

东濮凹陷古近系致密砂岩气成因与充注差异

Genesis and charge difference of Paleogene tight sandstone gas in Dongpu sag

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	赵玉龙, 刘香禺, 张烈辉, 吴婷婷, 单保超. 粗糙孔壁对微/纳米尺度下致密砂岩气流动的影响[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(5): 641-653.
[2]	胡勇, 李熙喆, 徐轩, 梅青燕, 陈颖莉, 王继平, 焦春艳, 郭长敏, 贾玉泽. 含水致密砂岩气藏可动用储量评价新方法及其应用[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(3): 332-340.
[3]	黄兴, 倪军, 李响, 薛俊杰, 柏明星, 周彤. 致密油藏不同微观孔隙结构储层CO₂驱动用特征及影响因素[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(7): 853-864.
[4]	曾联波, 刘国平, 朱如凯, 高志勇, 巩磊, 吕文雅. 库车前陆盆地深层致密砂岩储层构造成岩强度的定量评价方法[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(12): 1601-1609.
[5]	朱筱敏, 葛家旺, 吴陈冰洁, 张向涛, 汪旭东, 李晓燕, 黎明. 珠江口盆地陆丰凹陷深层砂岩储层特征及主控因素[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(s1): 69-80.
[6]	罗静兰, 何敏, 庞雄, 李弛, 柳保军, 雷川, 马永坤, 庞江. 珠江口盆地南部热演化事件与高地温梯度的成岩响应及其对油气勘探的启示[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(s1): 90-104.
[7]	包友书. 陆相泥页岩在水平地应力作用下裂缝的多样性——以济阳坳陷古近系泥页岩为例[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(7): 777-785.
[8]	张莉, 王威, 舒志国, 郝芳, 邹华耀, 杨烁. 川东北元坝地区须家河组钙质交代—胶结致密层分布与成因[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(6): 692-705.
[9]	杨海风, 王德英, 高雁飞, 王军, 李正宇, 钱赓. 渤海湾盆地盆缘洼陷新近系天然气成因与油气差异富集机理——以黄河口凹陷东洼为例[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(5): 509-518.
[10]	卢欢, 王清斌, 杜晓峰, 郭龙龙, 燕歌, 王夏斌, 刘军钊. 低渗透储层类型划分及储层敏感性主控因素——以渤海海域古近系为例[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(11): 1331-1345,1367.
[11]	刘桃, 刘景东. 欠压实与流体膨胀成因超压的定量评价[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(9): 971-979.
[12]	李潮流, 胡法龙, 袁超, 李霞, 李长喜, 刘学锋. 利用核磁共振与常规测井联合反演确定致密储层多矿物组分[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(9): 1019-1027.
[13]	李易隆, 贾爱林, 冀光, 郭建林, 王国亭, 郭智, 张吉. 鄂尔多斯盆地中-东部下石盒子组八段辫状河储层构型[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(9): 1037-1050.
[14]	操应长, 杨田, 宋明水, 王艳忠, 马奔奔, 王健, 远光辉, 葸克来. 陆相断陷湖盆低渗透碎屑岩储层特征及相对优质储层成因——以济阳坳陷东营凹陷古近系为例[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(7): 727-743.
[15]	张顺, 刘惠民, 王敏, 傅爱兵, 包友书, 王伟庆, 滕建彬, 方正伟. 东营凹陷页岩油储层孔隙演化[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(7): 754-766.