预加压测试页岩含气量新方法

doi:10.7623/syxb201710009

石油学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (10): 1189-1193,1199.DOI: 10.7623/syxb201710009

预加压测试页岩含气量新方法

姚光华¹, 熊伟², 胥云², 王晓泉¹, 宜伟¹, 董卫军¹, 杜宏宇¹, 龚齐森¹

1. 重庆矿产资源开发有限公司重庆 401123;
2. 中国石油勘探开发研究院廊坊分院河北廊坊 065007

收稿日期:2016-10-13 修回日期:2017-07-10 出版日期:2017-10-25 发布日期:2017-11-02
通讯作者: 熊伟,男,1971年12月生,1994年获西南石油学院学士学位,2010年获中国科学院渗流力学所博士学位,现为中国石油勘探开发研究院高级工程师,主要从事低渗透致密油气藏开发基础理论研究.Email:xiongwei69@petrochina.com.cn
作者简介:姚光华,男,1963年5月生,1986年获西安矿业学院煤田地质与勘探专业学士学位,现为重庆矿产资源开发有限公司高级工程师,主要从事页岩气、煤层气等非常规能源综合研究及勘探管理工作.Email:yiwei19831113@163.com
基金资助:
国家重大科技专项（2011ZX05018-005）资助。

A new method of pre-pressurized test on shale gas content

Yao Guanghua¹, Xiong Wei², Xu Yun², Wang Xiaoquan¹, Yi Wei¹, Dong Weijun¹, Du Hongyu¹, Gong Qisen¹

1. Chongqing Mineral Resources Development Co. Ltd., Chongqing 401123, China;
2. Langfang Branch, PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Hebei Langfang 065007, China

Received:2016-10-13 Revised:2017-07-10 Online:2017-10-25 Published:2017-11-02

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

页岩含气量是页岩气藏储量计算的重要参数，对气藏评价和开发指标计算有重要意义。现场解吸是测试页岩含气量的主要方法，但由于损失气量占含气量的40 % ~80 % ，使传统方法的测试结果饱受质疑。结合国内外新的测试方法，提出了一种预加压测试页岩含气量的新方法，可以规避损失气量的计算，大幅度提高测试精度。在井场，将岩心置于高压罐内，用增压泵将甲烷注入岩心直至压力达到预定压力，在储层温度下，待压力稳定后解吸测试页岩含气量。该方法对于是否已知储层压力的不同情况，采取不同的测试流程。如果已知储层压力，预加压使岩心压力达到储层压力，解吸结果就是页岩含气量；如果储层压力未知，则可通过建立页岩含气量计算理论公式求解。测试流程为先对1个岩心开展超过吸附饱和压力的2次加压（压力均超过20 MPa）及解吸测试，然后利用理论公式和2次加压解吸结果，得到单位质量页岩内的吸附气量和任意压力下的游离气量计算公式。在后期测试出储层压力后，根据游离气计算公式，计算出该压力下的游离气量，游离气量与吸附气量之和即为页岩的含气量。

关键词: 页岩, 含气量, 损失气, 吸附气, 预加压

Abstract:

Shale gas content is an important parameter for shale gas reservoir reserve estimation, which is of great significance to the evaluation of gas reservoir and the calculation of development index. Field desorption is a major method for measuring shale gas content, and the lost gas volume accounts for 40 % -80 % of shale gas content. However, the test results of such conventional method are quite questionable. In this study, based on the new test methods a new pre-pressurizing method was proposed to measure shale gas content, which could avoid calculating the lost gas volume and greatly increased the test accuracy. At well site, the cores were placed in a high-pressure container, pressurized to a given pressure by injecting methane by booster pump; under the formation temperature, the shale gas content was desorbed and tested till the pressure stabilizes. This method adopt two different processes in two cases, i.e., whether the formation pressure is known or not before experiment. If the formation pressure is known, the cores are pre-pressurized to reach formation pressure, and the desorption result is exactly the shale gas content. If the formation pressure is unknown, a theoretical model is established to calculate shale gas content. The test process is as below:firstly, a core is pressurized twice to exceed the adsorbed saturation pressure (over 20 MPa)for desorption test, then the desorption results of twice pressurizations are used to solve the theoretical equation and obtain the calculation equations of adsorbed gas volume for a unit mass of shale and the free gas volume under any pressure. When the formation pressure is tested later, the calculation equation of free gas is adopted to calculate the free gas volume under this pressure, and the sum of free gas volume and absorbed gas volume is equal to shale gas content.

Key words: shale, gas content, lost gas, adsorbed gas, pre-pressurizing

中图分类号:

TE135

姚光华, 熊伟, 胥云, 王晓泉, 宜伟, 董卫军, 杜宏宇, 龚齐森. 预加压测试页岩含气量新方法[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38(10): 1189-1193,1199.

Yao Guanghua, Xiong Wei, Xu Yun, Wang Xiaoquan, Yi Wei, Dong Weijun, Du Hongyu, Gong Qisen. A new method of pre-pressurized test on shale gas content[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2017, 38(10): 1189-1193,1199.

参考文献

[1] 聂海宽,金之钧,边瑞康,等. 四川盆地及其周缘上奥陶统五峰组—下志留统龙马溪组页岩气"源-盖控藏"富集[J].石油学报,2016,37(5):557-571.
NIE Haikuan,JIN Zhijun,BIAN Ruikang,et al.The "source-cap hydrocarbon-controlling" enrichment of shale gas in upper Ordovician Wufeng Formation-Lower Silurian Longmaxi formation of Sichuan basin and its periphery[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2016,37(5):557-571.
[2] 秦华,范小军,刘明,等.焦石坝地区龙马溪组页岩解吸气地球化学特征及地质意义[J].石油学报,2016,37(7):846-854.
QIN Hua,FAN Xiaojun,LIU Ming,et al.Geochemical characteristics and geological significance of desorbed shale gas in Longmaxi Formation,Jiaoshiba area[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2016,37(7):846-854.
[3] 鲍云杰.从煤层含气量测定技术发展看页岩含气性评价的发展方向[J].石油实验地质,2014,36(6):762-766.
BAO Yunjie.Prospect of shale gas evaluation in view of measurement techniques development of coal seam gas content[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2014,36(6):762-766.
[4] 唐颖,张金川,刘珠江,等.解吸法测量页岩含气量及其方法的改进[J].天然气工业,2011,31(10):108-112.
TANG Ying,ZHANG Jinchuan,LIU Zhujiang,et al.Use and improvement of the desorption method in shale gas content tests[J].Natural Gas Industry,2011,31(10):108-112.
[5] 范明.中国石化无锡石油地质研究所实验地质技术之页岩含气量现场测量[J].石油实验地质,2013,35(2):112.
FAN Ming.Sinopec field measurement of shale gas content in experimental geological technology of Wuxi Institute of petroleum geology[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2013,35(2):112.
[6] 赵希春,朱金堂,刘振东,等.便携式快速解吸仪的研制[J].石油仪器,2012,26(3):30-31.
ZHAO Xichun,ZHU Jintang,LIU Zhendong,et al.Development of portable rapid analytical instrument[J].Petroleum Instruments,2012,26(3):30-31.
[7] 薛晓辉,岳小金,韦巍.页岩含气量测定过程中的几点建议[J].中国煤炭地质,2013,25(4):27-29.
XUE Xiaohui,YUE Xiaojin,WEI Wei.Some suggestions in shale gas content measuring process[J].Coal Geology of China,2013,25(4):27-29.
[8] 胡微雪,薛晓辉,李维,等.页岩含气量测定方法分析与优化[J].中外能源,2014,19(11):61-65.
HU Weixue,XUE Xiaohui,LI Wei,et al.Analysis and optimization on determination method of gas content of the shale[J].Sino-Global Energy,2014,19(11):61-65.
[9] 刘洪林,邓泽,刘德勋,等.页岩含气量测试中有关损失气量估算方法[J].石油钻采工艺,2010,32(增刊1):156-158.
LIU Honglin,DENG Ze,LIU Dexun,et al.Discussion on lost gas calculating methods in shale gas content testing[J].Oil Drilling & Production Technology,2010,32(S1):156-158.
[10] 邢雅文,张金川,冯赫青,等.页岩含气量测试方法改进效果分析[J].断块油气田,2015,22(5):579-583.
XING Yawen,ZHANG Jinchuan,FENG Heqing,et al.Effectiveness analysis of determination method for shale gas content[J].Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field,2015,22(5):579-583.
[11] 姚光华,王晓泉,杜宏宇,等.USBM方法在页岩气含气量测试中的适应性[J].石油学报,2016,37(6):802-806.
YAO Guanghua,WANG Xiaoquan,DU Hongyu,et al.Applicability of USBM method in the test on shale gas content[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2016,37(6):802-806.
[12] BERTARD C,BRUYET B,GUNTHER J.Determination of desorbable gas concentration of coal (direct method)[J].International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts,1970,7 (1):43-65.
[13] WAECHTER N B,HAMPTON Ⅲ G L,SHIPPS J C.Overview of coal and shale gas measurement:field and laboratory procedures[C]//Proceedings of the 2004 International Coalbed Methane Symposium.Tuscaloosa,Alabama:The University of Alabama,2004.
[14] SHTEPANI E,NOLL L A,ELROD L W,et al.A new regression-based method for accurate measurement of coal and shale gas content[J].SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering,2010,13(2):359-364.
[15] ULERY J P,HYMAN D M.The modified direct method of gas content determination—applications and results[C]//Proceedings of the 1991 Coalbed Methane Symposium.Tuscaloosa,Alabama:The University of Alabama,1991:13-17.
[16] 魏强,晏波,肖贤明.页岩气解吸方法研究进展[J].天然气地球科学,2015,26(9):1657-1665.
WEI Qiang,YAN Bo,XIAO Xianming.Research progress on the desorption methods of shale gas[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2015,26(9):1657-1665.
[17] 俞凌杰,范明,陈红宇,等.富有机质页岩高温高压重量法等温吸附实验[J].石油学报,2015,36(5):557-563.
YU Lingjie,FAN Ming,CHEN Hongyu,et al.Isothermal adsorption experiment of organic-rich shale under high temperature and pressure using gravimetric method[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2015,36(5):557-563.
[18] 左罗,王玉普,熊伟,等.页岩含气量计算新方法[J].石油学报,2015,36(4):469-474.
Z UO Luo,WANG Yupu,XIONG Wei,et al.A new method to calculate the shale gas content[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2015,36(4):469-474.
[19] MURATA K,KANEKO K.Nano-range interfacial layer upon high-pressure adsorption of supercritical gases[J]. Chemical Physics Letters,2000,321(5/6):342-348.

预加压测试页岩含气量新方法

A new method of pre-pressurized test on shale gas content

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	付锁堂, 金之钧, 付金华, 李士祥, 杨伟伟. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组7段从致密油到页岩油认识的转变及勘探开发意义[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(5): 561-569.
[2]	糜利栋. 基于产气剖面的页岩气离散裂缝网络反演方法[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(4): 481-491.
[3]	张建国, 姜在兴, 刘立安, 袁方, 冯路尧, 李长昇. 渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷沙河街组三段下亚段细粒沉积岩岩相特征与沉积演化[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(3): 293-306.
[4]	赵贤正, 蒲秀刚, 周立宏, 金凤鸣, 韩国猛, 时战楠, 韩文中, 丁娱娇, 张伟, 王国娜, 刘学伟, 汪虎. 深盆湖相区页岩油富集理论、勘探技术及前景——以渤海湾盆地黄骅坳陷古近系为例[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(2): 143-162.
[5]	游利军, 康毅力, 周洋, 陈强, 程秋洋, 徐洁明, 陈杨. 油气储层氧敏性概念、机理与意义[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(2): 186-197.
[6]	何骁, 吴建发, 雍锐, 赵圣贤, 周小金, 张洞君, 张德良, 钟成旭. 四川盆地长宁—威远区块海相页岩气田成藏条件及勘探开发关键技术[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(2): 259-272.
[7]	匡立春, 侯连华, 杨智, 吴松涛. 陆相页岩油储层评价关键参数及方法[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(1): 1-14.
[8]	梁兴, 徐政语, 张介辉, 张朝, 李兆丰, 蒋佩, 蒋立伟, 朱斗星, 刘臣. 浅层页岩气高效勘探开发关键技术——以昭通国家级页岩气示范区太阳背斜区为例[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(9): 1033-1048.
[9]	陈浩, 周涛, 樊怀才, 张鉴, 杨胜来. 页岩储层人工裂缝岩样制备方法及应力敏感性[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(9): 1117-1126.
[10]	周立宏, 韩国猛, 马建英, 陈长伟, 杨飞, 张莉华, 周可佳, 陈双清, 杨帆, 董越崎, 周静. 歧口凹陷西南缘沙河街组一段下亚段古环境特征与沉积模式[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(8): 903-917.
[11]	李俊乾, 卢双舫, 张鹏飞, 李文镖, 荆铁亚, 冯文俊. 页岩基质孔隙水定量表征及微观赋存机制[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(8): 979-990.
[12]	付锁堂, 付金华, 牛小兵, 李士祥, 吴志宇, 周新平, 刘江艳. 庆城油田成藏条件及勘探开发关键技术[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(7): 777-795.
[13]	赵贤正, 周立宏, 蒲秀刚, 时战楠, 韩国猛, 吴佳朋, 韩文中, 张伟, 高欢欢, 马建英, 汪虎. 歧口凹陷歧北次凹沙河街组三段页岩油地质特征与勘探突破[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(6): 643-657.
[14]	罗文彬, 马中良, 郑伦举, 谭静强, 王张虎, 宁传祥. 海相页岩成岩-成烃过程中孔隙结构的演变——来自热模拟实验的启示[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(5): 540-552.
[15]	毕海滨, 孟昊, 高日丽, 郑婧, 徐小林, 鞠秀娟, 牛伟, 张劲, 周明庆, 赵丽华. 页岩气未开发区单井可采储量评估方法[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(5): 565-573.