焦石坝地区五峰组—龙马溪组一段页岩岩相展布特征及发育主控因素

doi:10.7623/syxb201806003

石油学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (6): 631-644.DOI: 10.7623/syxb201806003

焦石坝地区五峰组—龙马溪组一段页岩岩相展布特征及发育主控因素

王超¹, 张柏桥¹, 陆永潮², 舒志国¹, 陆亚秋¹, 包汉勇¹, 孟志勇¹, 陈雷³

1. 中国石油化工股份有限公司江汉油田分公司勘探开发研究院湖北武汉 430223;
2. 中国地质大学海洋学院湖北武汉 430074;
3. 西南石油大学地球科学与技术学院四川成都 610500

收稿日期:2017-07-31 修回日期:2018-03-20 出版日期:2018-06-25 发布日期:2018-07-03
通讯作者: 王超,男,1987年1月生,2015年获中国地质大学(武汉)矿产普查与勘探专业博士学位,现为中国石油化工股份有限公司江汉油田分公司博士后,主要从事非常规油气资源评价及储层地球物理精细表征研究。Email:wangchao0502@163.com
作者简介:王超,男,1987年1月生,2015年获中国地质大学(武汉)矿产普查与勘探专业博士学位,现为中国石油化工股份有限公司江汉油田分公司博士后,主要从事非常规油气资源评价及储层地球物理精细表征研究。Email:wangchao0502@163.com
基金资助:
国家科技重大专项"涪陵页岩气开发示范工程"（2016ZX05060），国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目（No.41602147，No.41702149）和中国博士后科学基金面上项目（2017M622559）资助。

Lithofacies distribution characteristics and main development controlling factors of shale in Wufeng Formation-Member 1 of Longmaxi Formation in Jiaoshiba area

Wang Chao¹, Zhang Baiqiao¹, Lu Yongchao², Shu Zhiguo¹, Lu Yaqiu¹, Bao Hanyong¹, Meng Zhiyong¹, Chen Lei³

1. Exploration and Development Research Institute, Sinopec Jianghan Oilfield Company, Hubei Wuhan 430223, China;
2. College of Marine Science and Technology, China University of Geosciences, Hubei Wuhan 430074, China;
3. School of Geoscience and Technology, Southwest Petroleum University, Sichuan Chengdu 610500, China

Received:2017-07-31 Revised:2018-03-20 Online:2018-06-25 Published:2018-07-03

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

页岩岩相展布及发育主控因素研究是页岩气勘探开发地质评价的基础性工作。基于岩心、岩石薄片、阴极发光、全岩X射线衍射、ECS元素测井、主量/微量元素等资料，运用岩矿三端元法和页岩岩性分级命名方法，识别出了焦石坝地区五峰组—龙马溪组一段海相页岩发育的3大类、8亚类页岩岩相，并揭示了页岩岩相的时空展布规律及发育主控因素。研究区海相页岩垂向演化具有三分性特征，自下至上依次发育有硅质类页岩、混合类页岩和黏土类页岩；页岩横向展布具有南北差异性特征，北部页岩岩相变化较快，其中混合类页岩发育厚度显著大于南部，而南部硅质类页岩岩相厚度相对较大。页岩岩相差异性特征受控于特殊沉积地质事件，其中硅质类页岩发育在一定程度上受控于奥陶纪—志留纪全球性火山事件，混合类页岩受底流作用影响显著，而黏土类页岩主要受陆源碎屑物质供给作用影响。

关键词: 页岩, 岩相, 时空展布, 沉积环境, 主控因素, 龙马溪组, 焦石坝地区

Abstract:

The study of shale lithofacies distribution and the main development controlling factor is essential for the geological evaluation of shale gas exploration and development. Based on the comprehensive analyses of cores, thin sections, cathode luminescence, whole-rock X-ray diffraction, ECS logging, major/trace element and other data, the three-end-member method and shale lithofacies classification nomenclature are applied to identify the three major classifications and eight sub-type shale lithofacies in the shale of Wufeng Formation-Member 1 of Longmaxi Formation, Jiaoshiba area, and reveal the spatiotemporal distribution laws and main development controlling factors of shale lithofacies. In the study area, the vertical evolution of marine shale has a tripartite feature, and the siliceous shale, mixed shale and argillaceous shale are developed from bottom to top. Besides, the shale lateral distribution is characterized by north-south difference; the shale lithofacies of the north area changes rapidly. The thickness of hybrid shale in the north area is significantly larger than that of the south area, while that of siliceous shale in the south area is relatively thicker. The difference in shale lithofacies is controlled by special sedimentary geologic events; the development of siliceous shale is controlled by the Ordovician-Silurian global volcanic event in a certain degree, while hybrid shale is affected by the effect of bottom current, and argillaceous shale is mainly influenced by the supply of terrestrial clastic material.

Key words: shale, lithofacies, spatiotemporal distribution, sedimentary environment, main controlling factors, Longmaxi Formation, Jiaoshiba area

中图分类号:

TE123

王超, 张柏桥, 陆永潮, 舒志国, 陆亚秋, 包汉勇, 孟志勇, 陈雷. 焦石坝地区五峰组—龙马溪组一段页岩岩相展布特征及发育主控因素[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(6): 631-644.

Wang Chao, Zhang Baiqiao, Lu Yongchao, Shu Zhiguo, Lu Yaqiu, Bao Hanyong, Meng Zhiyong, Chen Lei. Lithofacies distribution characteristics and main development controlling factors of shale in Wufeng Formation-Member 1 of Longmaxi Formation in Jiaoshiba area[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2018, 39(6): 631-644.

参考文献

[1] CHEN Lei,LU Yongchao,JIANG Shu,et al.Heterogeneity of the Lower Silurian Longmaxi marine shale in the southeast Sichuan Basin of China[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,2015,65:232-246.
[2] XIONG Fengyang,JIANG Zhenxue,TANG Xianglu,et al.Characteristics and origin of the heterogeneity of the Lower Silurian Longmaxi marine shale in southeastern Chongqing,SW China[J].Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering,2015,27:1389-1399.
[3] HICKEY J J,HENK B.Lithofacies summary of the Mississippian Barnett Shale,Mitchell 2 T.P.Sims well,Wise County,Texas[J].AAPG Bulletin,2007,91(4):437-443.
[4] LOUCKS R G,RUPPEL S C.Mississippian Barnett Shale:lithofacies and depositional setting of a deep-water shale-gas succession in the Fort Worth Basin,Texas[J].AAPG Bulletin,2007,91(4):579-601.
[5] ROSS D J K,BUSTIN M R.The importance of shale composition and pore structure upon gas storage potential of shale gas reservoirs[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,2009,26(6):916-927.
[6] MILLIKEN K L,ESCH W L,REED R M,et al.Grain assemblages and strong diagenetic overprinting in siliceous mudrocks,Barnett Shale (Mississippian),Fort Worth Basin,Texas[J].AAPG Bulletin,2012,96(8):1553-1578.
[7] 冉波,刘树根,孙玮,等.四川盆地及周缘下古生界五峰组-龙马溪组页岩岩相分类[J].地学前缘,2016,23(2):96-107.
RAN Bo,LIU Shugen,SUN Wei,et al.Lithofacies classification of shales of the Lower Paleozoic Wufeng-Longmaxi Formations in the Sichuan Basin and its surrounding areas,China[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2016,23(2):96-107.
[8] ROSS D J K,BUSTIN R M.Characterizing the shale gas resource potential of Devonian-Mississippian strata in the western Canada sedimentary basin:application of an integrated formation evaluation[J].AAPG Bulletin,2008,92(1):87-125.
[9] APLIN A C,MACQUAKER J H S.Mudstone diversity:origin and implications for source,seal,and reservoir properties in petroleum systems[J].AAPG Bulletin,2011,95(12):2031-2059.
[10] 杨万芹,蒋有录,王勇.东营凹陷沙三下-沙四上亚段泥页岩岩相沉积环境分析[J].中国石油大学学报:自然科学版,2015,39(4):19-26.
YANG Wanqin,JIANG Youlu,WANG Yong.Study on shale facies sedimentary environment of lower Es₃-upper Es₄ in Dongying sag[J].Journal of China University of Petroleum:Edition of Natural Science,2015,39(4):19-26.
[11] 耳闯,罗安湘,赵靖舟,等.鄂尔多斯盆地华池地区三叠系延长组长7段富有机质页岩岩相特征[J].地学前缘,2016,23(2):108-117.
ER Chuang,LUO Anxiang,ZHAO Jingzhou,et al.Lithofacies features of organic-rich shale of the Triassic Yanchang Formation in Huachi aera,Ordos Basin[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2016,23(2):108-117.
[12] 聂海宽,金之钧,边瑞康,等.四川盆地及其周缘上奥陶统五峰组-下志留统龙马溪组页岩气"源-盖控藏"富集[J].石油学报,2016,37(5):557-571.
NIE Haikuan,JIN Zhijun,BIAN Ruikang,et al.The "source-cap hydrocarbon-controlling" enrichment of shale gas in Upper Ordovician Wufeng Formation-Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation of Sichuan Basin and its periphery[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2016,37(5):557-571.
[13] 聂海宽,金之钧,马鑫,等.四川盆地及邻区上奥陶统五峰组-下志留统龙马溪组底部笔石带及沉积特征[J].石油学报,2017,38(2):160-174.
NIE Haikuan,JIN Zhijun,MA Xin,et al.Graptolites zone and sedimentary characteristics of Upper Ordovician Wufeng Formation-Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation in Sichuan Basin and its adjacent areas[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2017,38(2):160-174.
[14] 舒逸,陆永潮,刘占红,等.海相页岩中斑脱岩发育特征及对页岩储层品质的影响——以涪陵地区五峰组-龙马溪组一段为例[J].石油学报,2017,38(12):1371-1380.
SHU Yi,LU Yongchao,LIU Zhanhong,et al.Development characteristics of bentonite in marine shale and its effect on shale reservoir quality:a case study of Wufeng Formation to Member 1 of Longmaxi Formation,Fuling area[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2017,38(12):1371-1380.
[15] 王玉满,王淑芳,董大忠,等.川南下志留统龙马溪组页岩岩相表征[J].地学前缘,2016,23(1):119-133.
WANG Yuman,WANG Shufang,DONG Dazhong,et al.Lithofacies characterization of Longmaxi Formation of the Lower Silurian,southern Sichuan[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2016,23(1):119-133.
[16] 郭正吾,邓康龄,韩永辉,等.四川盆地形成与演化[M].北京:地质出版社,1996:89-138.
GUO Zhengwu,DENG Kangling,HAN Yonghui,et al.The formation and development of Sichuan Basin[M].Beijing:Geological Press,1996:89-138.
[17] 牟传龙,周恳恳,梁薇,等.中上扬子地区早古生代烃源岩沉积环境与油气勘探[J].地质学报,2011,85(4):526-532.
MU Chuanlong,ZHOU Kenken,LIANG Wei,et al.Early paleozoic sedimentary environment of hydrocarbon source rocks in the middle-upper Yangtze region and petroleum and gas exploration[J].Acta Geologica Sinica,2011,85(4):526-532.
[18] 王志刚,孙健.涪陵页岩气田实验井组开发实践与认识[M].北京:中国石化出版社,2014:67-102.
WANG Zhigang,SUN Jian.Development and cognition of experimental well group in Fuling shale gas field[M].Beijing:China Petrochemical Press,2014:67-102.
[19] 郭彤楼,张汉荣.四川盆地焦石坝页岩气田形成与富集高产模式[J].石油勘探与开发,2014,41(1):28-36.
GUO Tonglou,ZHANG Hanrong.Formation and enrichment mode of Jiaoshiba shale gas field,Sichuan Basin[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2014,41(1):28-36.
[20] WANG Guochang,CARR T R.Methodology of organic-rich shale lithofacies identification and prediction:a case study from Marcellus Shale in the Appalachian Basin[J].Computers & Geosciences,2012,49:151-163.
[21] CLUFF R M.Paleoenvironment of the New Albany shale group (Devonian-Mississippian)of Illinois[J].Journal of Sedimentary Petrology,1980,50(3):767-780.
[22] 蒋裕强,宋益滔,漆麟,等.中国海相页岩岩相精细划分及测井预测:以四川盆地南部威远地区龙马溪组为例[J].地学前缘,2016,23(1):107-118.
JIANG Yuqiang,SONG Yitao,QI Lin,et al.Fine lithofacies of China's marine shale and its logging prediction:a case study of the Lower Silurian Longmaxi marine shale in Weiyuan area,southern Sichuan Basin,China[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2016,23(1):107-118.
[23] 董春梅,马存飞,林承焰,等.一种泥页岩层系岩相划分方法[J].中国石油大学学报:自然科学版,2015,39(3):1-7.
DONG Chunmei,MA Cunfei,LIN Chengyan,et al.A method of classification of shale set[J].Journal of China University of Petroleum:Edition of Natural Science,2015,39(3):1-7.
[24] 吴蓝宇,胡东风,陆永潮,等.四川盆地涪陵气田五峰组-龙马溪组页岩优势岩相[J].石油勘探与开发,2016,43(2):189-197.
WU Lanyu,HU Dongfeng,LU Yongchao,et al.Advantageous shale lithofacies of Wufeng Formation-Longmaxi Formation in Fuling gas field of Sichuan Basin,SW China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2016,43(2):189-197.
[25] 王志峰,张元福,梁雪莉,等.四川盆地五峰组-龙马溪组不同水动力成因页岩岩相特征[J].石油学报,2014,35(4):623-632.
WANG Zhifeng,ZHANG Yuanfu,LIANG Xueli,et al.Characteristics of shale lithofacies formed under different hydrodynamic conditions in the Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation,Sichuan Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2014,35(4):623-632.
[26] 石油信息与计算机应用专业标准化委员会.石油地质岩石名称及颜色代码:SY/T 5751-2012[S].北京:石油工业出版社,2013.
Standardization Committee of Petroleum Information and Computer Application.Codes for names and colors of rocks in the petroleum geology:SY/T 5751-2012[S].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2013.
[27] 赵建华,金之钧,金振奎,等.四川盆地五峰组-龙马溪组页岩岩相类型与沉积环境[J].石油学报,2016,37(5):572-586.
ZHAO Jianhua,JIN Zhijun,JIN Zhenkui,et al.Lithofacies types and sedimentary environment of shale in Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation,Sichuan Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2016,37(5):572-586.
[28] MCLENNAN S M.Relationships between the trace element composition of sedimentary rocks and upper continental crust[J].Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems,2001,2(4):1021-1024.
[29] CANFIELD D E.Factors influencing organic carbon preservation in marine sediments[J].Chemical Geology, 1994,114(3/4):315-329.
[30] TRIBOVILLARD N,ALGEO T J,LYONS T,et al.Trace metals as paleoredox and paleoproductivity proxies:an update[J].Chemical Geology,2006,232(1/2):12-32.
[31] 沈俊,施张燕,冯庆来.古海洋生产力地球化学指标的研究[J].地质科技情报,2011,30(2):69-77.
SHEN Jun,SHI Zhangyan,FENG Qinglai.Review on geochemical proxies in paleo-productivity studies[J].Geological Science and Technology Information,2011,30(2):69-77.
[32] TYSON R V.The "productivity versus preservation" controversy:cause,flaws,and resolution[M]//HARRIS N B.Deposition of Organic-Carbon-Rich Sediments:Models Mechanisms,and Consequences.Geological Society,London,Special Publications 82,2005:17-33.
[33] RAISWELL R,BERNER R A.Organic carbon losses during burial and thermal maturation of normal marine shales[J].Geology,1987,15(9):853-856.
[34] DYMOND J,SUESS E,LYLE M.Barium in deep-sea sediment:a geochemical proxy for paleoproductivity[J].Paleoceanography,1992,7(2):163-181.
[35] 常华进,储雪蕾,冯连君,等.氧化还原敏感微量元素对古海洋沉积环境的指示意义[J].地质论评,2009,55(1):91-99.
CHANG Huajin,CHU Xuelei,FENG Lianjun,et al.Redox sensitive trace elements as paleoenvironments proxies[J].Geological Review,2009,55(1):91-99.
[36] 林治家,陈多福,刘芊.海相沉积氧化还原环境的地球化学识别指标[J].矿物岩石地球化学通报,2008,27(1):72-80.
LIN Zhijia,CHEN Duofu,LIU Qian.Geochemical indices for redox conditions of marine sediments[J].Bulletin of Mineralogy,Petrology and Geochemistry,2008,27(1):72-80.
[37] ADAMS J A S,WEAVER C E.Thorium-to-uranium ratios as indicators of sedimentary processes:example of concept of geochemical facies[J].AAPG Bulletin,1958,42(2):387-430.
[38] 胡艳华,刘健,周明忠,等.奥陶纪和志留纪钾质斑脱岩研究评述[J].地球化学,2009,38(4):393-404.
HU Yanhua,LIU Jian,ZHOU Mingzhong,et al.An overview of Ordovician and Silurian K-bentonites[J]. Geochimica,2009,38(4):393-404.
[39] 苏文博,何龙清,王永标,等.华南奥陶-志留系五峰组及龙马溪组底部斑脱岩与高分辨综合地层[J].中国科学D辑:地球科学,2002,32(3):207-219.
SU Wenbo,HE Longqing,WANG Yongbiao,et al.K-bentonite beds and high-resolution integrated stratigraphy of the uppermost Ordovician Wufeng and the lowest Silurian Longmaxi formations in South China[J].Science in China Series D:Earth Sciences,2003,46(11):1121-1133.
[40] RAUP M R,SEPKOSKI JR J J.Mass extinctions in the marine fossil record[J].Science,1982,215(4539):1501-1503.
[41] CHEN Xu,YU Rongjia.Concepts and analysis of mass extinction with the late Ordovician event as an example[J].Historical Biology,1991,5(2/4):107-121.
[42] SHEEHAN P M.The late Ordovician mass extinction[J].Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences,2001,29:331-364.
[43] 胡艳华,孙卫东,丁兴,等.奥陶纪-志留纪边界附近火山活动记录:来华南周缘钾质斑脱岩的信息[J].岩石学报,2009,25(12):3298-3308.
HU Yanhua,SUN Weidong,DING Xing,et al.Volcanic event at the Ordovician-Silurian boundary:the message front K-bentonite of Yangtze Block[J].Acta Petrologica Sinica,2009,25(12):3298-3308.
[44] 李传金,任贾文,秦大河,等.火山活动的气候影响及其冰芯记录研究进展[J].冰川冻土,2012,34(4):863-876.
LI Chuanjin,REN Jiawen,QIN Dahe,et al.Summary of research on climatic influences from volcanic activities and depositional records of volcanic matters in ice cores[J].Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology,2012,34(4):863-876.
[45] ROWE H D,LOUCKS R G,RUPPEL S C,et al.Mississippian Barnett formation,Fort Worth Basin,Texas:bulk geochemical inferences and Mo-TOC constraints on the severity of hydrographic restriction[J].Chemical Geology,2008,257(1/2):16-25.
[46] 李登华,李建忠,黄金亮,等.火山灰对页岩油气成藏的重要作用及其启示[J].天然气工业,2014,34(5):56-65.
LI Denghua,LI Jianzhong,HUANG Jinliang,et al.An important role of volcanic ash in the formation of shale plays and its inspiration[J].Natural Gas Industry,2014,34(5):56-65.
[47] 王书荣,宋到福,何登发.三塘湖盆地火山灰对沉积有机质的富集效应及凝灰质烃源岩发育模式[J].石油学报,2013,34(6):1077-1087.
WANG Shurong,SONG Daofu,HE Dengfa.The enrichment effect of organic materials by volcanic ash in sediments of the Santanghu Basin and the evolutionary pattern of tuffaceous source rocks[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2013,34(6):1077-1087.
[48] 吴嘉鹏,王英民,王海荣,等.深水重力流与底流交互作用研究进展[J].地质论评,2012,58(6):1110-1120.
WU Jiapeng,WANG Yingmin,WANG Hairong,et al.The interaction between deep-water turbidity and bottom currents:a review[J].Geological Review,2012,58(6):1110-1120.
[49] FAUGÈRES J C,STOW D A V.Bottom-current-controlled sedimentation:a synthesis of the contourite problem[J].Sedimentary Geology,1993,82(1/4):287-297.
[50] SHANMUGAM G.Deep-water bottom currents and their deposits[M]//REBESCO M,CAMERLENGHI A.Developments in Sedimentology 60:Contourites.Amsterdam:Elsevier,2008.
[51] SHANMUGAM G.深水砂体成因研究新进展[J].石油勘探与开发,2013,40(3):294-301.
SHANMUGAM G.New perspectives on deep-water sandstones:implications[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2013,40(3):294-301.
[52] 陈旭,戎嘉余,周志毅,等.上扬子区奥陶-志留纪之交的黔中隆起和宜昌上升[J].科学通报,2001,46(12):1052-1056.
CHEN Xu,RONG Jiayu,ZHOU Zhiyi,et al.Qianzhong uplift and Yichang rise formed at transition between the Ordovician and Silurian in upper Yangtze region[J].Chinese Science Bulletin,2001,46(12):1052-1056.
[53] 张春明,张维生,郭英海.川东南-黔北地区龙马溪组沉积环境及对烃源岩的影响[J].地学前缘,2012,19(1):136-145.
ZHANG Chunming,ZHANG Weisheng,GUO Yinghai.Sedimentary environment and its effect on hydrocarbon source rocks of Longmaxi Formation in southeast Sichuan and northern Guizhou[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2012,19(1):136-145.

焦石坝地区五峰组—龙马溪组一段页岩岩相展布特征及发育主控因素

Lithofacies distribution characteristics and main development controlling factors of shale in Wufeng Formation-Member 1 of Longmaxi Formation in Jiaoshiba area

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	付锁堂, 金之钧, 付金华, 李士祥, 杨伟伟. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组7段从致密油到页岩油认识的转变及勘探开发意义[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(5): 561-569.
[2]	罗涛, 郭小文, 舒志国, 包汉勇, 何生, 覃泽健, 肖智慧. 四川盆地焦石坝南部地区五峰组—龙马溪组裂缝脉体流体来源及形成时间[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(5): 611-622.
[3]	吴建发, 赵圣贤, 范存辉, 夏自强, 季春海, 张成林, 曹埒焰. 川南长宁地区龙马溪组富有机质页岩裂缝发育特征及其与含气性的关系[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(4): 428-446.
[4]	糜利栋. 基于产气剖面的页岩气离散裂缝网络反演方法[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(4): 481-491.
[5]	李宁, 徐彬森, 武宏亮, 冯周, 李雨生, 王克文, 刘鹏. 人工智能在测井地层评价中的应用现状及前景[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(4): 508-522.
[6]	张建国, 姜在兴, 刘立安, 袁方, 冯路尧, 李长昇. 渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷沙河街组三段下亚段细粒沉积岩岩相特征与沉积演化[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(3): 293-306.
[7]	刘春, 陈世加, 赵继龙, 陈戈, 苏洲, 高乔. 远源油气成藏条件与富集主控因素——以库车坳陷南部斜坡带中生界-新生界油气藏为例[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(3): 307-318.
[8]	赵贤正, 蒲秀刚, 周立宏, 金凤鸣, 韩国猛, 时战楠, 韩文中, 丁娱娇, 张伟, 王国娜, 刘学伟, 汪虎. 深盆湖相区页岩油富集理论、勘探技术及前景——以渤海湾盆地黄骅坳陷古近系为例[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(2): 143-162.
[9]	游利军, 康毅力, 周洋, 陈强, 程秋洋, 徐洁明, 陈杨. 油气储层氧敏性概念、机理与意义[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(2): 186-197.
[10]	何骁, 吴建发, 雍锐, 赵圣贤, 周小金, 张洞君, 张德良, 钟成旭. 四川盆地长宁—威远区块海相页岩气田成藏条件及勘探开发关键技术[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(2): 259-272.
[11]	匡立春, 侯连华, 杨智, 吴松涛. 陆相页岩油储层评价关键参数及方法[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(1): 1-14.
[12]	梁兴, 徐政语, 张介辉, 张朝, 李兆丰, 蒋佩, 蒋立伟, 朱斗星, 刘臣. 浅层页岩气高效勘探开发关键技术——以昭通国家级页岩气示范区太阳背斜区为例[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(9): 1033-1048.
[13]	陈浩, 周涛, 樊怀才, 张鉴, 杨胜来. 页岩储层人工裂缝岩样制备方法及应力敏感性[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(9): 1117-1126.
[14]	周立宏, 韩国猛, 马建英, 陈长伟, 杨飞, 张莉华, 周可佳, 陈双清, 杨帆, 董越崎, 周静. 歧口凹陷西南缘沙河街组一段下亚段古环境特征与沉积模式[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(8): 903-917.
[15]	李俊乾, 卢双舫, 张鹏飞, 李文镖, 荆铁亚, 冯文俊. 页岩基质孔隙水定量表征及微观赋存机制[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(8): 979-990.