低渗透油藏水锁机理与助排表面活性剂的优选原则

doi:10.7623/syxb202006009

石油学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (6): 745-752.DOI: 10.7623/syxb202006009

低渗透油藏水锁机理与助排表面活性剂的优选原则

梁天博, 马实英, 魏东亚, 周福建, 梁星原

中国石油大学(北京)油气资源与勘探国家重点实验室北京 102249

收稿日期:2019-07-07 修回日期:2020-02-18 出版日期:2020-06-25 发布日期:2020-07-11
通讯作者: 梁天博,男,1986年4月生,2009年获清华大学材料科学与工程专业学士学位,2016年获美国得克萨斯大学奥斯汀分校石油工程专业博士学位,现为中国石油大学(北京)非常规油气科学技术研究院助理研究员,主要从事储层改造与提高致密储层采收率研究工作。
作者简介:梁天博,男,1986年4月生,2009年获清华大学材料科学与工程专业学士学位,2016年获美国得克萨斯大学奥斯汀分校石油工程专业博士学位,现为中国石油大学(北京)非常规油气科学技术研究院助理研究员,主要从事储层改造与提高致密储层采收率研究工作。Email:btliang@cup.edu.cn
基金资助:
中国石油科技创新基金项目（2018D-5007-0205）和中国石油大学（北京）引进人才科研启动基金项目（2462017YJRC031）资助。

Water blocking mechanism of low-permeability reservoirs and screening principle of flowback surfactants

Liang Tianbo, Ma Shiying, Wei Dongya, Zhou Fujian, Liang Xingyuan

State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China

Received:2019-07-07 Revised:2020-02-18 Online:2020-06-25 Published:2020-07-11

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

低渗透油藏水力压裂之后，压裂液进入岩石基质会造成水锁伤害，从而降低基质渗透率。由于低渗透岩石具有孔喉小、毛细管力大、原油动用深度浅等特征，毛细管末端效应会加剧毛细管力滞留侵入压裂液所产生的水锁伤害。明确这种水锁形式的伤害程度与作用时长，有利于正确评估水平井单井产能在返排过程中的恢复程度，并依此合理地优化现场"焖井"处理时机与压裂液中助排剂的使用。利用CT扫描实时监测下的岩心流动实验，明确了低渗透岩石中毛细管末端效应造成的附加水锁伤害，及其伤害程度与作用时长随岩石渗透率与水侵深度的变化规律。该附加伤害从程度和时长上，都大于原油生产对应毛细管数下残余水饱和度对基质渗透率的水锁伤害，其作用时长随岩心物性参数√K/φ的减小而线性增加，随水侵深度的增加而呈幂函数增加趋势。实验结果表明，利用渗吸作用解除水锁伤害对致密储层的效果甚微，需要依靠在压裂液中添加表面活性剂（助排剂）辅助压裂液返排而进行提产。通过对比3种能够实现跨越5个数量级油水界面张力（10^-4~23 mN/m）的表面活性剂体系，揭示了水湿低渗透油藏中助排剂的显著效果，以及油湿低渗透储层中润湿性反转优于降低油水界面张力的提产效果。

关键词: 水锁伤害, 低渗透油藏, 毛细管末端效应, 表面活性剂, 返排

Abstract:

After hydraulic fracturing in low-permeability reservoirs, fracturing fluid entering the rock matrix will cause water blocking damage, thereby reducing the matrix permeability. The low-permeability rock is characteristic of small pore throat, large capillary force, and shallow producing depth of crude oil, which can aggravate the water blocking damage in rock matrix near the fracture face due to the capillary end effect. To determine the damage degree and duration of this type of water blocking, core flow experiments under real-time monitoring by CT scanning is conducted in this study. Results indicate that this form of water blocking delays the recovery of matrix permeability during the flowback, and its duration increases linearly with the decrease of the core physical parameter √K/φ and exponentially increases with the increasing water invasion depth. Results also indicate that shut-in treatments has little effect on mitigating such water blocking in low-permeability reservoirs, and it is necessary to add flowback surfactants to the fracturing fluid to enhance the flowback of fracturing fluid and increase production. By comparing three surfactant systems that can achieve the oil-water interfacial tension increased by five orders of magnitude (10^-4~23 mN/m), the paper clarifies the significant effects of flowback surfactants in water-wet low-permeability reservoirs, and that of wettability-alteration surfactants in oil-wet low-permeability reservoirs.

Key words: water blocking damage, low-permeability reservoir, capillary end effect, surfactant, flowback

中图分类号:

TE348

梁天博, 马实英, 魏东亚, 周福建, 梁星原. 低渗透油藏水锁机理与助排表面活性剂的优选原则[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(6): 745-752.

Liang Tianbo, Ma Shiying, Wei Dongya, Zhou Fujian, Liang Xingyuan. Water blocking mechanism of low-permeability reservoirs and screening principle of flowback surfactants[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(6): 745-752.

参考文献

[1] 邹才能,朱如凯,吴松涛,等. 常规与非常规油气聚集类型、特征、机理及展望——以中国致密油和致密气为例[J].石油学报,2012,33(2):173-187.
ZOU Caineng,ZHU Rukai,WU Songtao,et al.Types,characteristics,genesis and prospects of conventional and unconventional hydrocarbon accumulations:taking tight oil and tight gas in China as an instance[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2012,33(2):173-187.
[2] U.S.Energy Information Administration.Technically recoverable shale oil and shale gas resources:China[R].Washington,DC:U.S.Department of Energy,2015.
[3] 贾承造,邹才能,李建忠,等.中国致密油评价标准、主要类型、基本特征及资源前景[J].石油学报,2012,33(3):343-350.
JIA Chengzao,ZOU Caineng,LI Jianzhong,et al.Assessment criteria,main types,basic features and resource prospects of the tight oil in China[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2012,33(3):343-350.
[4] 毕海滨,段晓文,郑婧,等.致密油生产动态特征及可采储量评估方法[J].石油学报,2018,39(2):172-179.
BI Haibin,DUAN Xiaowen,ZHENG Jing,et al.Production dynamic characteristics and recoverable reserve estimation method of tight oil[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2018,39(2):172-179.
[5] 刘顺,何衡,赵倩云,等.水力裂缝与天然裂缝交错延伸规律[J].石油学报,2018,39(3):320-326,334.
LIU Shun,HE Heng,ZHAO Qianyun,et al.Staggered extension laws of hydraulic fracture and natural fracture[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2018,39(3):320-326,334.
[6] 邱正松,逄培成,黄维安,等.页岩储层防水锁微乳液的制备与性能[J].石油学报,2013,34(2):334-339.
QIU Zhengsong,PANG Peicheng,HUANG Wei'an,et al.Preparation and performance of anti-waterblock micromulsion for shale reservoirs[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2013,34(2):334-339.
[7] 贾爱林,王国亭,孟德伟,等.大型低渗-致密气田井网加密提高采收率对策——以鄂尔多斯盆地苏里格气田为例[J].石油学报,2018,39(7):802-813.
JIA Ailin,WANG Guoting,MENG Dewei,et al.Well pattern infilling strategy to enhance oil recovery of giant low-permeability tight gasfield:a case study of Sulige gasfield,Ordos Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2018,39(7):802-813.
[8] LIANG Tianbo,LUO Xiao,NGUYEN Q,et al.Computed-tomography measurements of water block in low-permeability rocks:scaling and remedying production impairment[J].SPE Journal,2018,23(3):762-771.
[9] HOLDITCH S A.Factors affecting water blocking and gas flow from hydraulically fractured gas wells[J].Journal of Petroleum Technology,1979,31(12):1515-1524.
[10] ABRAMS A,VINEGAR H J.Impairment mechanisms in Vicksburg tight gas sands[R].SPE 13883,1985.
[11] 苟启洋,徐尚,郝芳,等.纳米CT页岩孔隙结构表征方法——以JY-1井为例[J].石油学报,2018,39(11):1253-1261.
GOU Qiyang,XU Shang,HAO Fang,et al.Characterization method of shale pore structure based on nano-CT:a case study of Well JY-1[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2018,39(11):1253-1261.
[12] MAHADEVAN J,SHARMA M M.Factors affecting clean-up of water-blocks:a laboratory investigation[J].SPE Journal,2005,10(3):238-246.
[13] PATZEK T W,MALE F,MARDER M.Gas production in the Barnett shale obeys a simple scaling theory[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2013,110(49):19731-19736.
[14] MALE F,MARDER M P,BROWNING J,et al.Marcellus wells' ultimate production accurately predicted from initial production[R].SPE 180234,2016.
[15] LAKE L W,JOHNS R,ROSSEN B,et al.Fundamentals of enhanced oil recovery[M].Texas:Society of Petroleum Engineers,2014.
[16] LIANG Tianbo,LONGORIA R A,LU Jun,et al.Enhancing hydrocarbon permeability after hydraulic fracturing:laboratory evaluations of shut-ins and surfactant additives[J].SPE Journal,2017,22(4):1011-1023.
[17] LONGORIA R A,LIANG Tianbo,HUYNH U T,et al.Water blocks in tight formations:the role of matrix/fracture interaction in hydrocarbon-permeability reduction and its implications in the use of enhanced oil recovery techniques[J].SPE Journal,2017,22(5):1393-1401.
[18] YAN Q,LEMANSKI C,KARPYN Z T,et al.Experimental investigation of shale gas production impairment due to fracturing fluid migration during shut-in time[J].Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering,2015,24:99-105.
[19] PENNY G S,PURSLEY J T.Field studies of drilling and completion fluids to minimize damage and enhance gas production in unconventional reservoirs[R].SPE 107844,2007.
[20] ZELENEV A S,ELLENA L.Microemulsion technology for improved fluid recovery and enhanced core permeability to gas[R].SPE 122109,2009.
[21] ROSTAMI A,NASR-EL-DIN H A.Microemulsion vs.surfactant assisted gas recovery in low permeability formations with water blockage[R].SPE 169582,2014.
[22] LIANG Tianbo,ACHOUR S H,LONGORIA R A,et al.Flow physics of how surfactants can reduce water blocking caused by hydraulic fracturing in low permeability reservoirs[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,2017,157:631-642.
[23] HUH C.Interfacial tensions and solubilizing ability of a microemulsion phase that coexists with oil and brine[J].Journal of Colloid and Interface Science,1979,71(2):408-426.
[24] RAPOPORT L A,LEAS W J.Properties of linear waterfloods[J].Journal of Petroleum Technology,1953,5(5):139-148.
[25] TRAN T,SINURAT P D,WATTENBARGER B A.Production characteristics of the Bakken shale oil[R].SPE 145684,2011.
[26] YU Wei,SEPEHRNOORI K.Optimization of well spacing for Bakken tight oil reservoirs[R].SPE 1922108,2014.
[27] SIMPSON M D,PATTERSON R,WU Kan.Study of stress shadow effects in eagle ford shale:insight from field data analysis[R].ARMA 2016-190, 2016.
[28] WU Yongfu,SHULER P J,BLANCO M,et al.An experimental study of wetting behavior and surfactant EOR in carbonates with model compounds[J].SPE Journal,2008,13(1):26-34.
[29] GUPTA R,MOHANTY K K.Wettability alteration mechanism for oil recovery from fractured carbonate rocks[J].Transport in Porous Media,2011,87(2):635-652.
[30] KAMATH J,MEYER R F,NAKAGAWA F M.Understanding waterflood residual oil saturation of four carbonate rock types[R].SPE 71505,2001.
[31] 贾宁洪,吕伟峰,常天全,等.高效无损岩心孔隙度精确测量新方法[J].石油学报,2018,39(7):824-828,844.
JIA Ninghong,LÜ Weifeng,CHANG Tianquan,et al.A new method for precisely measuring core porosity with high efficiency and no destruction[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2018,39(7):824-828,844.

低渗透油藏水锁机理与助排表面活性剂的优选原则

Water blocking mechanism of low-permeability reservoirs and screening principle of flowback surfactants

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	瞿超超, 刘正中, 殷鸿尧, 鲁光亮, 李祖友, 冯玉军. 新型排水采气用抗凝析油泡排剂[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(7): 865-874.
[2]	霍锦华, 张瑞, 杨磊. CTAB诱导膨润土乳液转相机理及其在可逆乳化油基钻井液中的应用[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(1): 122-128.
[3]	管保山, 梁利, 程芳, 刘静, 薛小佳, 胥云. 压裂返排液取水应用技术[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38(1): 99-104.
[4]	李彩风, 李阳, 曹嫣镔, 宋永亭, 李希明, 汪卫东, 包木太. 油藏环境产脂肽类表面活性剂微生物的分布[J]. 石油学报, 2015, 36(9): 1122-1126.
[5]	李松岩, 刘己全, 李兆敏, 李宾飞, 王鹏, 刘伟, 李金洋, 张超. 油藏条件下CO₂乳液稳定性实验[J]. 石油学报, 2015, 36(5): 584-592.
[6]	程杰成, 吴军政, 胡俊卿. 三元复合驱提高原油采收率关键理论与技术[J]. 石油学报, 2014, 35(2): 310-318.
[7]	张仲宏　杨正明　刘先贵　熊　伟　王学武. 低渗透油藏储层分级评价方法及应用[J]. 石油学报, 2012, 33(3): 437-441.
[8]	姜瑞忠　李林凯　徐建春　杨仁锋　庄　煜. 低渗透油藏非线性渗流新模型及试井分析[J]. 石油学报, 2012, 33(2): 264-268.
[9]	郝明强;胡永乐;李凡华. 特低渗透油藏压裂水平井产量递减规律[J]. 石油学报, 2012, 33(2): 269-273.
[10]	刘卫东孙春柳孙灵辉朱维耀. 三元复合体系表面活性剂在油水中的分配[J]. 石油学报, 2011, 32(6): 1017-1020.
[11]	王晓冬侯晓春郝明强杨涛. 低渗透介质有启动压力梯度的不稳态压力分析[J]. 石油学报, 2011, 32(5): 847-851.
[12]	姚军樊冬艳王晨晨张凯. 考虑二次梯度项低渗透油藏水平井压力动态分析[J]. 石油学报, 2011, 32(3): 479-483.
[13]	张黎明张凯李晓帆 Mojtaba Ghadiri Ali Hassanpour. 高强电场中液滴静电运动特性[J]. 石油学报, 2011, 32(3): 524-528.
[14]	甘云雁张士诚刘书杰齐桃曹砚锋. 整体压裂井网与裂缝优化设计新方法[J]. 石油学报, 2011, 32(2): 290-294.
[15]	魏浩光岳湘安赵永攀何建华. 特低渗透油藏天然气非混相驱实验[J]. 石油学报, 2011, 32(2): 307-310.