东海盆地西湖凹陷古近系煤的生烃动力学

doi:10.7623/syxb202010002

石油学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (10): 1174-1187,1218.DOI: 10.7623/syxb202010002

东海盆地西湖凹陷古近系煤的生烃动力学

刘金水¹, 李树霞², 秦兰芝¹, 易琦², 陈晓东¹, 康世龙², 沈文超², 邵龙义²

1. 中海石油(中国)有限公司上海分公司上海 200030;
2. 中国矿业大学(北京)地球科学与测绘工程学院北京 100083

收稿日期:2019-07-08 修回日期:2020-06-13 出版日期:2020-10-25 发布日期:2020-11-05
通讯作者: 邵龙义,男,1966年2月生,1983年获焦作矿业学院学士学位,1989年获中国矿业大学(北京)博士学位,现为中国矿业大学(北京)教授、博士生导师,主要从事沉积学与煤田地质学方面的科研与教学工作。Email:ShaoL@cumtb.edu.cn
作者简介:刘金水,男,1966年9月生,1988年获中国地质大学(武汉)学士学位,2005年获同济大学硕士学位,现为中海石油(中国)有限公司上海分公司教授级高级工程师,主要从事综合地质研究。Email:liujinshui@126.com
基金资助:
国家科技重大专项（2016ZX05027-001）资助。

Hydrocarbon generation kinetics of Paleogene coal in Xihu sag, East China Sea Basin

Liu Jinshui¹, Li Shuxia², Qin Lanzhi¹, Yi Qi², Chen Xiaodong¹, Kang Shilong², Shen Wenchao², Shao Longyi²

1. Shanghai Branch, CNOOC China Limited, Shanghai 200030, China;
2. School of Geoscience and Surveying Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Beijing 100083, China

Received:2019-07-08 Revised:2020-06-13 Online:2020-10-25 Published:2020-11-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

通过高温高压封闭体系条件下的热模拟实验和生烃动力学模拟分析，获得了西湖凹陷古近系平湖组和花港组煤生成气态烃的产率及其动力学参数。结合古地温演化史和热演化史恢复了西湖凹陷西部斜坡带、西次凹及中央构造带的古近系平湖组和花港组煤的生烃演化历史，并基于预测的镜质体反射率（R_o）建立了研究区煤的生气演化模式。研究结果表明，西湖凹陷煤所生成的天然气以甲烷（C₁）为主，重烃气（C₂—C₅）较少，C₁和总气态烃（C₁—C₅）的产率增长速率在煤的高成熟阶段（1.10%≤R_o<2.20%）最大，在成熟阶段（0.50%≤R_o<1.10%）次之，在过成熟阶段（R_o≥2.20%）最小，且含碳原子个数不同的重烃气（C₂、C₃、C₄和C₅）的主裂解期不同。在西湖凹陷煤的生烃演化过程中，西部斜坡带平湖组和花港组中的煤所生成的气态烃最少，生烃条件最差；而西次凹、中央构造带平湖组和花港组中煤所生成的气态烃较多，是比较有利的生烃区。花港组中煤生成气态烃的产率远小于平湖组，且至今尚未达到生烃高峰。

关键词: 西湖凹陷, 煤, 生烃动力学, 生烃史, 生气演化模式

Abstract:

Through thermal simulation experiments and simulation analysis of hydrocarbon generation kinetics under the closed system with high temperature and high pressure, this paper obtains the yields and kinetic parameters of gaseous hydrocarbons generated by coal from the Paleogene Pinghu Formation and Huagang Formation in Xihu sag. Further in combination with the evolution history of paleo-temperature and thermal evolution, the paper restores the hydrocarbon generation and evolution history of coal from the Paleogene Pinghu Formation and Huagang Formation in the western slope belt, the western sub-sag and the central structural belt of Xihu sag, and establishes the gas generation and evolution model of coal in the study area based on the predicted vitrinite reflectance value (R_o). The research results show that gas produced by coal in Xihu sag is domininated by methane (C₁), with less heavy hydrocarbon gas (C₂-C₅). The rate of rise in the yield of C₁ and the total yield of gaseous hydrocarbons (C₁-C₅) is the largest in the high mature stage of coal (1.10% ≤ R_o<2.20%), followed by the mature stage (0.50% ≤ R_o<1.10%), and the smallest in the over-mature stage (R_o ≥ 2.20%). Moreover, the heavy hydrocarbon gas with different numbers of carbon atom (C₂, C₃, C₄ and C₅) have different main cracking periods. During the hydrocarbon generation and evolution of coal in Xihu sag, coal in Pinghu Formation and Huagang Formation in the western slope belt produced the least gaseous hydrocarbons and had the worst hydrocarbon generation conditions; while Pinghu Formation and Huagang Formation in the western sub-sag and central structural belt produces more gaseous hydrocarbons and are favorable source areas. The yield of gaseous hydrocarbon from coal in Huagang Formation is much lower than that in Pinghu Formation, and it has not yet reached the hydrocarbon generation peak.

Key words: Xihu sag, coal, hydrocarbon generation kinetics, hydrocarbon generation history, gas generation and evolution model

中图分类号:

TE122.1

刘金水, 李树霞, 秦兰芝, 易琦, 陈晓东, 康世龙, 沈文超, 邵龙义. 东海盆地西湖凹陷古近系煤的生烃动力学[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(10): 1174-1187,1218.

Liu Jinshui, Li Shuxia, Qin Lanzhi, Yi Qi, Chen Xiaodong, Kang Shilong, Shen Wenchao, Shao Longyi. Hydrocarbon generation kinetics of Paleogene coal in Xihu sag, East China Sea Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(10): 1174-1187,1218.

参考文献

[1] 邹艳荣,帅燕华,孔枫,等.油气生成过程实验研究的思考与展望[J].石油实验地质,2004,26(4):375-382.
ZOU Yanrong,SHUAI Yanhua,KONG Feng,et al.Experiments on petroleum generation-considerations and outlook[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2004,26(4):375-382.
[2] UNGERER P,PELET R.Extrapolation of the kinetics of oil and gas Formation from laboratory experiments to sedimentary basins[J].Nature,1987,327(6117):52-54.
[3] TANG Y,PERRY J K,JENDEN P D,et al.Mathematical modeling of stable carbon isotope ratios in natural gases[J].Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta,2000,64(15):2673-2687.
[4] 王强,彭平安,张文正,等.鄂尔多斯盆地延长组7段页岩全组分定量生烃模拟及原油可动性评价[J].石油学报,2018,39(5):541-553.
WANG Qiang,PENG Ping'an,ZHANG Wenzheng,et al.Quantitative full-component hydrocarbon-generating simulation and crude oil mobility evaluation of shale in 7th Member of Yanchang Formation,Ordos Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2018,39(5):541-553.
[5] YE Jiaren,LU Delin,GU Huirong.Evaluation of petroleum system in Xihu depression,East China Sea Shelf Basin[J].Journal of China University of Geosciences,2001,12(4):343-350.
[6] SU Ao,CHEN Honghan,CHEN Xu,et al.The characteristics of low permeability reservoirs,gas origin,generation and charge in the central and western Xihu depression,East China Sea Basin[J].Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering,2018,53:94-109.
[7] 田杨,叶加仁,雷闯,等.断陷盆地海陆过渡相烃源岩发育模式:以西湖凹陷平湖组为例[J].地球科学,2019,44(3):898-908.
TIAN Yang,YE Jiaren,LEI Chuang,et al.Development Model for source rock of marine-continental transitional face in faulted basins:a case study of Pinghu Formation in Xihu sag[J].Earth Science,2019,44(3):898-908.
[8] 魏恒飞,陈践发,陈晓东,等.西湖凹陷平湖组滨海型煤系烃源岩发育环境及其控制因素[J].中国地质,2013,40(2):487-497.
WEI Hengfei,CHEN Jianfa,CHEN Xiaodong,et al.The controlling factors and sedimentary environment for developing coastal coal-bearing source rock of Pinghu Formation in Xihu depression[J].Geology in China,2013,40(2):487-497.
[9] ZHU Yangming,LI Ying,ZHOU Jie,et al.Geochemical characteristics of Tertiary coal-bearing source rocks in Xihu depression,East China Sea Basin[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,2012,35(1):154-165.
[10] 戴金星.煤成气涵义及其划分[J].地质论评,1982,28(4):370-372.
DAI Jinxing.Implication of coal-bed gas and its subdivision[J].Geological Review,1982,28(4):370-372.
[11] 胡国艺,魏志平,肖芝华,等.腐殖煤干酪根裂解气主生气成熟度上限探讨[J].沉积学报,2006,24(4):585-589.
HU Guoyi,WEI Zhiping,XIAO Zhihua,et al.Discussion on the maturity threshold of primary kreogen for cracking gas generation from humic coal[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2006,24(4):585-589.

[12] 叶军,郭迪孝.东海西湖凹陷天然气地化特征[J].石油实验地质,1996,18(2):174-181.
YE Jun,GUO Dixiao.Geochemical characters of the natural gas in West Lake depression,the East China Sea[J].Experimental Petroleum Geology,1996,18(2):174-181.
[13] 苏奥,陈红汉,王存武,等.东海盆地西湖凹陷油气成因及成熟度判别[J].石油勘探与开发,2013,40(5):521-527.
SU Ao,CHEN Honghan,WANG Cunwu,et al.Genesis and maturity identification of oil and gas in the Xihu sag,East China Sea Basin[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2013,40(5):521-527.
[14] 陈琳琳,孙伯强,王乐闻,等.西湖凹陷中央背斜带北部花港组天然气特征及气源分析[J].海洋石油,2017,37(1):21-29.
CHEN Linlin,SUN Boqiang,WANG Lewen,et al.Characteristics and source of natural gas from Huagang Formation in north segment of central anticline belt of Xihu sag[J].Offshore Oil,2017,37(1):21-29.
[15] 贾健谊,须雪豪,孙伯强.东海西湖凹陷原油与天然气的地球化学特征[J].海洋石油,2000(2):1-7.
JIA Jianyi,XU Xuehao,SUN Boqiang.Oil/Gas geochemical character in the Xihu trough of the East China Sea[J].Offshore Oil,2000(2):1-7.
[16] 钱门辉,侯读杰,蒋启贵,等.西湖凹陷煤系烃源岩显微组分组成特征及地质意义[J].石油实验地质,2012,34(2):182-185.
QIAN Menhui,HOU Dujie,JIANG Qigui,et al.Features and geologic significance of maceral composition of coal-bearing source rocks in Xihu sag[J].Petroleum Geology and Experiment,2012,34(2):182-185.
[17] 李上卿,李纯洁.东海西湖凹陷油气资源分布及勘探潜力分析[J].石油实验地质,2003,25(6):721-728.
LI Shangqing,LI Chunjie.Analysis on the petroleum resource distribution and exploration potential of the Xihu depression,the East China Sea[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2003,25(6):721-728.
[18] DAI Liming,LI Sanzhong,LOU Da,et al.Numerical modeling of Late Miocene tectonic inversion in the Xihu sag,East China Sea Shelf Basin,China[J].Journal of Asian Earth Sciences,2014,86:25-37.
[19] HAO Lewei,WANG Qi,TAO Huifei,et al.Geochemistry of Oligocene Huagang Formation clastic rocks,Xihu sag,the East China Sea Shelf Basin:provenance,source weathering,and tectonic setting[J].Geological Journal,2018,53(1):397-411.
[20] XIE Guoliang,SHEN Yulin,LIU Shugen,et al.Trace and Rare Earth Element (REE)characteristics of mudstones from Eocene Pinghu Formation and Oligocene Huagang Formation in Xihu sag,East China Sea Basin:implications for provenance,depositional conditions and paleoclimate[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,2018,92:20-36.
[21] 王丽娜.东海玉泉构造带及其邻区的构造特征及演化研究[D].青岛:中国海洋大学,2010.
WANG Li'na.The tectonic evolution of Yuquan structure and its surrounding areas in the East China Sea[D].Qingdao:Ocean University of China,2010.
[22] 赵志刚,王鹏,祁鹏,等.东海盆地形成的区域地质背景与构造演化特征[J].地球科学,2016,41(3):546-554.
ZHAO Zhigang,WANG Peng,QI Peng,et al.Regional background and tectonic evolution of East China Sea Basin[J].Earth Science,2016,41(3):546-554.
[23] 周倩羽,沈文超,张信,等.西湖凹陷古近系平湖组聚煤环境特征及模式[J].河北工程大学学报:自然科学版,2016,33(1):105-107.
ZHOU Qianyu,SHEN Wenchao,ZHANG Xin,et al.The coal-accumulating environments characteristics and coal-forming pattern of Pinghu Formation (Paleogene)in Xihu depression[J].Journal of Hebei University of Engineering:Natural Science Edition,2016,33(1):105-107.
[24] 易琦,邵龙义,秦兰芝,等.西湖凹陷平湖构造带花港组沉积环境与聚煤规律[J].煤炭科学技术,2018,46(2):73-83.
YI Qi,SHAO Longyi,QIN Lanzhi,et al.Sedimentary environment and coal accumulation law of Huagang Formation in Pinghu structural zone of Xihu depression[J].Coal Science and Technology,2018,46(2):73-83.
[25] 易琦.西湖凹陷古近系煤成烃与古地温场研究[D].北京:中国矿业大学,2018.
YI Qi.The study of coal-formed hydrocarbon and paleogeothermal field of the Paleogene in the Xihu depression[D].Beijing:China University of Mining and Technology,2018.
[26] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会.煤的显微组分组和矿物测定方法:GB/T 8899-2013[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2014.
General Administration of Quality Supervision,Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China,Standardization Administration of China.Determination of maceral group composition and minerals in coal:GB/T 8899-2013[S].Beijing:Standards Press of China,2014.
[27] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会.煤的镜质体反射率显微镜测定方法:GB/T 6948-2008[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2009.
General Administration of Quality Supervision,Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China,Standardization Administration of China.GB/T 6948-2008 Method of determining microscopically the reflectance of vitrinite in coal[S].Beijing:Standards Press of China,2009.
[28] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会.岩石热解分析:GB/T 18602-2012[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2013.
General Administration of Quality Supervision,Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China,Standardization Administration of China.Rock pyrolysis analysis:GB/T 18602-2012[S].Beijing:Standards Press of China,2013.
[29] 国家能源局.黄金管生烃热模拟实验方法:SY/T 7035-2016[S].北京:石油工业出版社,2016.
National Energy Administration.Method of thermal simulation in gold tubes for hydrocarbon generation of source rocks:SY/T 7035-2016[S].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2016.
[30] SWEENEY J J,BURNHAM A K.Evaluation of a simple model of vitrinite reflectance based on chemical kinetics[J].AAPG Bulletin,1990,74(10):1559-1570.
[31] PAN Changchun,JIANG Lanlan,LIU Jinzhong,et al.The effects of pyrobitumen on oil cracking in confined pyrolysis experiments[J].Organic Geochemistry,2012,45:29-47.
[32] HILL R J,TANG Yongchun,KAPLAN I R.Insights into oil cracking based on laboratory experiments[J].Organic Geochemistry,2003,34(12):1651-1672.
[33] 陈刚,赵重远,李丕龙等.R_o反演的盆地热史恢复方法与相关问题[J].石油与天然气,2002,23(4):343-347.
CHEN Gang,ZHAO Zhongyuan,LI Pilong,et al.R_o inversion of thermal history reconstruction in sedimentary basin and its related problems[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2002,23(4):343-347.
[34] 李贤庆,仰云峰,田辉,等.塔里木盆地满东1气藏天然气生成动力学研究[J].石油天然气学报,2010,32(5):49-55.
LI Xianqing,YANG Yunfeng,TIAN Hui,et al.Kinetics of natural gas generation of mandong 1 gas pool in Tarim Basin[J].Journal of Oil and Gas Technology,2010,32(5):49-55.
[35] WANG Yang,QIN Yong,YANG Liu,et al.Organic geochemical and petrographic characteristics of the coal measure source rocks of Pinghu Formation in the Xihu sag of the East China Sea Shelf Basin:implications for coal measure gas potential[J].Acta Geologica Sinica:English Edition,2020,94(2):364-375.
[36] HUNT J M.Petroleum geochemistry and geology[D].New York:WH Freeman and Company,1996.
[37] TISSOT B P,PELET R,UNGERER P.Thermal history of sedimentary basins,maturation indices,and kinetics of oil and gas generation[J].AAPG Bulletin,1987,71:1445-1466.
[38] KARIMI A R,RABBANI A R,KAMALI M R.A bulk kinetic,burial history and thermal modeling study of the Albian Kazhdumi and the Eocene-Oligocene Pabdeh formations in the Ahvaz anticline,Dezful Embayment,Iran[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,2016,146:61-70.
[39] 何将启.东海西湖凹陷构造-热历史分析[D].上海:同济大学,2004.
HE Jiangqi.Tectono-thernal history of Xihu depression,East China Sea[D].Shanghai:Tongji University,2004.
[40] DOW W G.Kerogen studies and geological interpretations[J].Journal of Geochemical Exploration,1977,7:79-99.
[41] MAGARA K.Thickness of removed sedimentary rocks,paleopore pressure,and paleotemperature,southwestern part of Western Canada Basin[J].AAPG Bulletin,1976,60(4):554-565.
[42] KOTARBA M.Isotopic geochemistry and habitat of the natural gases from the Upper Carboniferous acle coal-bearing Formation in the Nowa Ruda coal district (Lower Silesia,Poland)[J].Organic Geochemistry,1990,16(1/3):549-560.
[43] BURNHAM A K,HAPPE J A.On the mechanism of kerogen pyrolysis[J].Fuel,1984,63(10):1353-1356.
[44] DIECKMANN V,HORSFIELD B,SCHENK H J.Heating rate dependency of petroleum-forming reactions:implications for compositional kinetic predictions[J].Organic Geochemistry,2000,31(12):1333-1348.
[45] 段毅,吴保祥,郑朝阳,等.山西沁水盆地煤生烃动力学研究[J].科学通报,2005,50(13):1405-1411.
DUAN Yi,WU Baoxiang,ZHENG Chaoyang,et al.Study on kinetics of hydrocarbon generation from coals in the Qinshui Basin[J].Chinese Science Bulletin,2005,50(17):1904-1911.
[46] 钱门辉.西湖凹陷煤系烃源岩生烃特征研究[D].北京:中国地质大学,2010.
QIAN Menhui.Model research of generation of hydrocarbon coal source rock in Xihu depression[D].Beijing:China University of Geosciences,2010.
[47] 李友川,兰蕾,王柯,等.北部湾盆地流沙港组湖相烃源岩的差异[J].石油学报,2019,40(12):1451-1459.
LI Youchuan,LAN Lei,WANG Ke,et al.Differences in lacustrine source rocks of Liushagang Formation in the Beibuwan Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2019,40(12):1451-1459.
[48] 熊永强,耿安松,王云鹏,等.干酪根二次生烃动力学模拟实验研究[J].中国科学:D辑,2001,31(4):315-320.
XIONG Yongqiang,GENG Ansong,WANG Yunpeng,et al.Kinetic simulating experiment on the secondary hydrocarbon generation of kerogen[J].Science in China:Series D,2002,45(1):13-20.
[49] 罗静兰,何敏,庞雄,等.珠江口盆地南部热演化事件与高地温梯度的成岩响应及其对油气勘探的启示[J].石油学报,2019,40(增刊1):90-104.
LUO Jinglan,HE Min,PANG Xiong,et al.Diagenetic response on thermal evolution events and high geothermal gradients in the southern Pear River Mouth Basin and its enlightenment to hydrocarbon exploration[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2019,40(S1):90-104.
[50] 窦立荣.蒂索的生烃模式在深层遇到挑战(I)[J].石油勘探与开发,2000,27(2):44.
DOU Lirong.Tissot’s hydrocarbon generation model meets challenges in the deep layer (I)[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2000,27(2):44.
[51] 王东良,张英,卢双舫,等.烃源岩过成熟阶段生气潜力的实验室模拟[J].沉积学报,2012,30(6):1172-1179.
WANG Dongliang,ZHANG Ying,LU Shuangfang,et al.The simulation experiment on gas-generating potential of over mature source rocks[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2012,30(6):1172-1179.
[52] MAHLSTEDT N,HORSFIELD B,DIECKMANN V.Second order reactions as a prelude to gas generation at high maturity[J].Organic Geochemistry,2008,39(8):1125-1129.
[53] 陈建平,赵文智,王招明,等.海相干酪根天然气生成成熟度上限与生气潜力极限探讨——以塔里木盆地研究为例[J].科学通报,2007,52(增刊1):95-100.
CHEN Jianping,ZHAO Wenzhi,XIAO Zhongyao,et al.A discussion on the upper limit of maturity for gas generation by marine kerogens and the utmost of gas generative potential:taking the study on the Tarim Basin as an example[J].Chinese Science Bulletin,2007,52(S1):125-132.

东海盆地西湖凹陷古近系煤的生烃动力学

Hydrocarbon generation kinetics of Paleogene coal in Xihu sag, East China Sea Basin

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	邹玮, 余一欣, 刘金水, 蒋一鸣, 唐贤君, 陈石, 余浪. 东海盆地西湖凹陷中央反转构造带发育主控因素及宁波背斜形成过程[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(2): 176-185.
[2]	张遂安, 刘欣佳, 温庆志, 张潇, 赵威, 袁玉. 煤层气增产改造技术发展现状与趋势[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(1): 105-118.
[3]	马安来, 金之钧, 晏继发, 米敬奎, 李杰豪. 煤中金刚烷的分布与演化[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(7): 796-808.
[4]	王安民, 曹代勇, 聂敬, 秦荣芳. 巨厚煤储层孔隙结构的垂向非均质性特征——以青海聚乎更矿区为例[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(6): 691-701.
[5]	单长安, 张廷山, 梁兴, 胡冉冉, 赵卫卫. 富镜质组和富惰质组高阶煤纳米孔隙结构特征[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(6): 723-736.
[6]	康永尚, 邓泽, 皇甫玉慧, 毛得雷. 中煤阶煤层气高饱和—超饱和带的成藏模式和勘探方向[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(12): 1555-1566.
[7]	李相方, 冯东, 张涛, 孙政, 何敏侠, 刘庆, 刘文远, 赵文, 李靖. 毛细管力在非常规油气藏开发中的作用及应用[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(12): 1719-1733.
[8]	侯志强, 张书平, 李军, 赵靖舟, 刘云, 田连辉, 仲晓, 陈梦娜, 徐泽阳. 西湖凹陷中部西斜坡地区超压成因机制[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(9): 1059-1068,1124.
[9]	皇甫玉慧, 康永尚, 邓泽, 李贵中, 毛得雷, 刘洪林, 赵群, 孙天竹. 低煤阶煤层气成藏模式和勘探方向[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(7): 786-797.
[10]	宋岩, 马行陟, 柳少波, 姜林, 洪峰, 秦义. 沁水煤层气田成藏条件及勘探开发关键技术[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(5): 621-634.
[11]	康永尚, 皇甫玉慧, 张兵, 邓泽, 毛得雷, 何志平, 王建, 袁春林. 含煤盆地深层“超饱和”煤层气形成条件[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(12): 1426-1438.
[12]	秦勇, 申建, 沈玉林, 李耿, 范炳恒, 姚海鹏. 苏拉特盆地煤系气高产地质原因及启示[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(10): 1147-1157.
[13]	贺垠博, 蒋官澄, 王勇, 杨丽丽, 史亚伟, 张永清, 胡景东. 异电荷聚电解质自组装水凝胶在无固相煤层气钻井液中的特性[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(6): 719-726.
[14]	杨兆中, 刘云锐, 张平, 李小刚, 易良平. 煤层气直井地层破裂压力计算模型[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(5): 578-586.
[15]	张宏源, 黄中伟, 李根生, 陆沛青, 田守嶒, 李小江. 煤岩径向井-脉动水力压裂裂缝扩展规律与声发射响应特征[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(4): 472-481.