陆相页岩油储层评价关键参数及方法

doi:10.7623/syxb202101001

石油学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (1): 1-14.DOI: 10.7623/syxb202101001

• 地质勘探 • 下一篇

陆相页岩油储层评价关键参数及方法

匡立春¹, 侯连华², 杨智², 吴松涛²

1. 中国石油天然气股份有限公司科技管理部北京 100007;
2. 中国石油勘探开发研究院北京 100083

收稿日期:2020-04-23 修回日期:2020-08-26 出版日期:2021-01-25 发布日期:2021-02-05
通讯作者: 匡立春,男,1962年6月生,1982年获华东石油学院学士学位,2002年获石油大学(北京)博士学位,现为中国石油天然气股份有限公司科技管理部总经理、教授级高级工程师,主要从事油气勘探综合研究及科技管理工作。
作者简介:匡立春,男,1962年6月生,1982年获华东石油学院学士学位,2002年获石油大学(北京)博士学位,现为中国石油天然气股份有限公司科技管理部总经理、教授级高级工程师,主要从事油气勘探综合研究及科技管理工作。Email:klc@petrochina.com.cn
基金资助:
中国石油天然气股份有限公司国际合作项目（2015D-4810-02）和中国石油天然气股份有限公司重大科技专项（2019E-26）资助。

Key parameters and methods of lacustrine shale oil reservoir characterization

Kuang Lichun¹, Hou Lianhua², Yang Zhi², Wu Songtao²

1. Technology Administration Department, PetroChina Company Limited, Beijing 100007, China;
2. PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Beijing 100083, China

Received:2020-04-23 Revised:2020-08-26 Online:2021-01-25 Published:2021-02-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 勘探开发证实，陆相湖盆发育类型多样、分布广泛的页岩油，展现出巨量的资源前景。通过梳理中国陆相页岩油的主要勘探进展和地质认识，结合不同类型页岩油地质特征，重点研究了页岩油表征的关键参数及方法。研究结果表明：①页岩油实验项目主要包括有机地球化学、岩矿组分、储集性能、流体性质和岩石力学5个方面，可以优选出页岩TOC、总孔隙度、含油量、游离油量和有效厚度5个关键表征参数；②TOC是页岩中的总有机碳含量，燃烧氧化-非分散红外吸收法是其主要实验方法；③总孔隙度是页岩储集空间占岩石总体积的比例，可采用以物性与饱和度测试方法为核心的综合表征实验方法获得；④含油量是赋存于页岩储集空间内的烃类总量，包括自然条件的赋存烃量和人工干预的潜在烃量，中—高成熟度页岩采用密闭取心方法，中—低成熟度页岩采用含油率方法；⑤游离油量是页岩层系中可动的油气量，包括地层和开发条件下理论与实际的可动油量，采用密闭取心、核磁共振等实验和实际生产资料确定等方法获得；⑥有效厚度是指采用水平井开发时，单井控制的具有商业油气价值产出的页岩层段厚度，其存在上限和下限厚度值，采用测井"七性"评价方法获得。通过针对性优选出适用页岩油表征的关键参数及方法，对支撑中国陆相页岩油储量评价和产能建设具有重要意义。

关键词: 陆相页岩油, 页岩层系, 页岩总孔隙度, 页岩含油量, 页岩游离油量, 页岩有效厚度, 储量评价

Abstract: Exploration practices have proven that various types of shale oil are widely developed in the central lacustrine basin, demonstrating huge amount of resources with a great exploration prospect. By summarizing the important exploration advances and geological understandings of lacustrine shale oil in China, in combination with the geological characteristics of various types of shale oil, this study focuses on the key characterization parameters and methods of shale oil. The results show that:(I) The shale oil experiment project mainly involves five aspects including organic geochemistry, rock and mineral composition, reservoir properties, fluid properties and rock mechanics. Five key parameters including TOC, total porosity, oil content, free oil content and effective thickness are selected for shale oil characterization. (II) TOC indicates the total organic carbon content, for which combustion oxidation-non-dispersive infrared absorption method is the main experiment method. (III) Total porosity is the proportion of reservoir space to the total volume of rock, and can be obtained using the comprehensive characterization experiment method focusing on the physical properties and saturability tests of shale. (IV) Oil content refers to the total amount of hydrocarbons occurring in the reservoir space, including the amount of self-accumulated hydrocarbons under natural conditions and the potential amount of hydrocarbons generated by manual intervention. Closed coring method and oil content method is adopted for the shale oil with medium-high maturity and medium-low maturity respectively. (V) Free oil content is the amount of movable oil and gas in the shale systems, consisting of the theoretical and actual amount of movable hydrocarbon under the formation conditions and development conditions. It is obtained by closed coring and nuclear magnetic resonance experiments, as well as the determination on the basis of actual production data. (VI) Effective thickness refers to the thickness of the shale section with commercial oil and gas controlled by a single well during horizontal well development. The upper and lower limit values are obtained by the evaluation of seven properties in well logging. It is of great significance to optimize the key parameters and methods suitable for shale oil characterization, to provide theoretical and technical support for the reserve evaluation and production capacity construction of lacustrine shale oil in China.

Key words: lacustrine shale oil, shale system, total porosity of shales, oil content of shales, free oil content, effective thickness of shales, reserve evaluation

中图分类号:

TE122.2

匡立春, 侯连华, 杨智, 吴松涛. 陆相页岩油储层评价关键参数及方法[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(1): 1-14.

Kuang Lichun, Hou Lianhua, Yang Zhi, Wu Songtao. Key parameters and methods of lacustrine shale oil reservoir characterization[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2021, 42(1): 1-14.

参考文献

[1] 匡立春,唐勇,雷德文,等.准噶尔盆地二叠系咸化湖相云质岩致密油形成条件与勘探潜力[J].石油勘探与开发,2012,39(6):657-667.
KUANG Lichun,TANG Yong,LEI Dewen,et al.Formation conditions and exploration potential of tight oil in the Permian saline lacustrine dolomitic rock,Junggar Basin,NW China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2012,39(6):657-667.
[2] 邹才能,杨智,崔景伟,等.页岩油形成机制、地质特征及发展对策[J].石油勘探与开发,2013,40(1):14-26.
ZOU Caineng,YANG Zhi,CUI Jingwei,et al.Formation mechanism,geological characteristics and development strategy of nonmarine shale oil in China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2013,40(1):14-26.
[3] 金之钧,白振瑞,高波,等.中国迎来页岩油气革命了吗?[J].石油与天然气地质,2019,40(3):451-458.
JIN Zhijun,BAI Zhenrui,GAO Bo,et al.Has China ushered in the shale oil and gas revolution?[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2019,40(3):451-458.
[4] 国家市场监督管理总局,国家标准化管理委员会.页岩油地质评价方法:GB/T 38718-2020[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2020.
State Administration for Market Regulation,Standardization Administration.Geological evaluating methods for shale oil:GB/T 38718-2020[S].Beijing:Standards Press of China,2020.
[5] 邹才能,董大忠,王玉满,等.中国页岩气特征、挑战及前景(一)[J].石油勘探与开发,2015,42(6):689-701.
ZOU Caineng,DONG Dazhong,WANG Yuman,et al.Shale gas in China:characteristics,challenges and prospects (I)[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2015,42(6):689-701.
[6] 赵文智,胡素云,侯连华.页岩油地下原位转化的内涵与战略地位[J].石油勘探与开发,2018,45(4):537-545.
ZHAO Wenzhi,HU Suyun,HOU Lianhua.Connotation and strategic role of in-situ conversion processing of shale oil underground in the onshore China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2018,45(4):537-545.
[7] 杨智,邹才能."进源找油":源岩油气内涵与前景[J].石油勘探与开发,2019,46(1):173-184.
YANG Zhi,ZOU Caineng."Exploring petroleum inside source kitchen":connotation and prospects of source rock oil and gas[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2019,46(1):173-184.
[8] WU Songtao,YANG Zhi,ZHAI Xiufen,et al.An experimental study of organic matter,minerals and porosity evolution in shales within high-temperature and high-pressure constraints[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,2019,102:377-390.
[9] 张厚福.中国油气运移研究现状与今后的发展方向[C]//油气成藏机理及油气资源评价国际研讨会论文集.北京:石油大学(北京)盆地与油藏研究中心,1996.
ZHANG Houfu.Research status of hydrocarbon migration and its future developing trend in China[C]//International proceedings of hydrocarbon accumulation mechanism and hydrocarbon resources evaluation.Beijing:Basin and Reservoir Research Center of China University of Petroleum(Beijing),1996.
[10] 郭元岭,赵乐强,蒋有录.济阳坳陷探井商业油流标准研究[J].石油勘探与开发,2004,31(3):101-103.
GUO Yuanling,ZHAO Leqiang,JIANG Youlu.Commercial criterion for daily output of exploratory well in the Jiyang depression,Shengli oilfield[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2004,31(3):101-103.
[11] 付金华,牛小兵,淡卫东,等.鄂尔多斯盆地中生界延长组长7段页岩油地质特征及勘探开发进展[J].中国石油勘探,2019,24(5):601-614.
FU Jinhua,NIU Xiaobing,DAN Weidong,et al.The geological characteristics and the progress on exploration and development of shale oil in Chang7 Member of Mesozoic Yanchang Formation,Ordos Basin[J].China Petroleum Exploration,2019,24(5):601-614.
[12] 吴河勇,林铁锋,白云风,等.松辽盆地北部泥(页)岩油勘探潜力分析[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2019,38(5):78-86.
WU Heyong,LIN Tiefeng,BAI Yunfeng,et al.Analyses of the mudstone (shale)oil exploration potential in North Songliao Basin[J].Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing,2019,38(5):78-86.
[13] 赵贤正,周立宏,蒲秀刚,等.陆相湖盆页岩层系基本地质特征与页岩油勘探突破——以渤海湾盆地沧东凹陷古近系孔店组二段一亚段为例[J].石油勘探与开发,2018,45(3):361-372.
ZHAO Xianzheng,ZHOU Lihong,PU Xiugang,et al.Geological characteristics of shale rock system and shale oil exploration in a lacustrine basin:a case study from the Paleogene 1st sub-member of Kong 2 Member in Cangdong sag,Bohai Bay Basin,China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2018,45(3):361-372.
[14] 杨华,牛小兵,徐黎明,等.鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系长7段页岩油勘探潜力[J].石油勘探与开发,2016,43(4):511-520.
YANG Hua,NIU Xiaobing,XU Liming,et al.Exploration potential of shale oil in Chang7 Member,Upper Triassic Yanchang Formation,Ordos Basin,NW China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2016,43(4):511-520.
[15] 张欣,刘吉余,侯鹏飞.中国页岩油的形成和分布理论综述[J].地质与资源,2019,28(2):165-170.
ZHANG Xin,LIU Jiyu,HOU Pengfei.A review on the formation and distribution theories of the shale oil in China[J].Geology and Resources,2019,28(2):165-170.
[16] 郑民,李建忠,吴晓智,等.我国常规与非常规石油资源潜力及未来重点勘探领域[J].海相油气地质,2019,24(2):1-13.
ZHENG Min,LI Jianzhong,WU Xiaozhi,et al.The conventional and unconventional oil resource potential and key exploration fields in China[J]. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology,2019,24(2):1-13.
[17] 朱日房,张林晔,李政,等.陆相断陷盆地页岩油资源潜力评价——以东营凹陷沙三段下亚段为例[J].油气地质与采收率,2019,26(1):129-136.
ZHU Rifang,ZHANG Linye,LI Zheng,et al.Evaluation of shale oil resource potential in continental rift basin:a case study of Lower Es₃ Member in Dongying sag[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2019,26(1):129-136.
[18] WU Songtao,ZOU Caineng,ZHU Rukai,et al.Characteristics and origin of tight oil accumulations in the Upper Triassic Yanchang Formation of the Ordos Basin,North-Central China[J].Acta Geologica Sinica,2016,90(5):1821-1837.
[19] WU Songtao,ZHU Rukai,YANG Zhi,et al.Distribution and characteristics of lacustrine tight oil reservoirs in China[J].Journal of Asian Earth Sciences,2019,178:20-36.
[20] MA Weijiao,HOU Lianhua,LUO Xia,et al.Role of bitumen and NSOs during the decomposition process of a lacustrine Type-II kerogen in semi-open pyrolysis system[J].Fuel,2020,259:116211.
[21] MA Weijiao,HOU Lianhua,LUO Xia,et al.Generation and expulsion process of the Chang 7 oil shale in the Ordos Basin based on temperature-based semi-open pyrolysis:implications for in-situ conversion process[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,2020,190:107035.
[22] 胡素云,陶士振,闫伟鹏,等.中国陆相致密油富集规律及勘探开发关键技术研究进展[J].天然气地球科学,2019,30(8):1083-1093.
HU Suyun,TAO Shizhen,YAN Weipeng,et al.Advances on continental tight oil accumulation and key technologies for exploration and development in China[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2019,30(8):1083-1093.
[23] 付金华,李士祥,侯雨庭,等.鄂尔多斯盆地延长组7段Ⅱ类页岩油风险勘探突破及其意义[J].中国石油勘探,2020,25(1):78-92.
FU Jinhua,LI Shixiang,HOU Yuting,et al.Breakthrough of risk exploration of Class II shale oil in Chang 7 Member of Yanchang Formation in the Ordos Basin and its significance[J].China Petroleum Exploration,2020,25(1):78-92.
[24] 杨智,侯连华,林森虎,等.吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组致密油、页岩油地质特征与勘探潜力[J].中国石油勘探,2018,23(4):76-85.
YANG Zhi,HOU Lianhua,LIN Senhu,et al.Geologic characteristics and exploration potential of tight oil and shale oil in Lucaogou Formation in Jimsar sag[J].China Petroleum Exploration,2018,23(4):76-85.
[25] 杨跃明,黄东,杨光,等.四川盆地侏罗系大安寨段湖相页岩油气形成地质条件及勘探方向[J].天然气勘探与开发,2019,42(2):1-12.
YANG Yueming,HUANG Dong,YANG Guang,et al.Geological conditions to form lacustrine facies shale oil and gas of Jurassic Daanzhai Member in Sichuan Basin and exploration directions[J].Natural Gas Exploration and Development,2019,42(2):1-12.
[26] 胡英杰,王延山,黄双泉,等.辽河坳陷石油地质条件、资源潜力及勘探方向[J].海相油气地质,2019,24(2):43-54.
HU Yingjie,WANG Yanshan,HUANG Shuangquan,et al.The geological conditions,resource potential,and exploration direction of oil in Liaohe depression[J].Marine Origin Petroleum Geology,2019,24(2):43-54.
[27] 高凤琳,宋岩,梁志凯,等.陆相页岩有机质孔隙发育特征及成因——以松辽盆地长岭断陷沙河子组页岩为例[J].石油学报,2019,40(9):1030-1044.
GAO Fenglin,SONG Yan,LIANG Zhikai,et al.Development characteristics of organic pore in the continental shale and its genetic mechanism:a case study of Shahezi Formation shale in the Changling fault depression of Songliao Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2019,40(9):1030-1044.
[28] 刘惠民,于炳松,谢忠怀,等.陆相湖盆富有机质页岩微相特征及对页岩油富集的指示意义——以渤海湾盆地济阳坳陷为例[J].石油学报,2018,39(12):1328-1343.
LIU Huimin,YU Bingsong,XIE Zhonghuai,et al.Characteristics and implications of micro-lithofacies in lacustrine-basin organic-rich shale:a case study of Jiyang depression,Bohai Bay Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2018,39(12):1328-1343.
[29] 赵贤正,周立宏,蒲秀刚,等.断陷湖盆湖相页岩油形成有利条件及富集特征——以渤海湾盆地沧东凹陷孔店组二段为例[J].石油学报,2019,40(9):1013-1029.
ZHAO Xianzheng,ZHOU Lihong,PU Xiugang,et al.Favorable formation conditions and enrichment characteristics of lacustrine facies shale oil in faulted lake basin:a case study of Member 2 of Kongdian Formation in Cangdong sag,Bohai Bay Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2019,40(9):1013-1029.
[30] 王香增,张丽霞,雷裕红,等.低熟湖相页岩内运移固体有机质和有机质孔特征——以鄂尔多斯盆地东南部延长组长7油层组页岩为例[J].石油学报,2018,39(2):141-151.
WANG Xiangzeng,ZHANG Lixia,LEI Yuhong,et al.Characteristics of migrated solid organic matters and organic pores in low maturity lacustrine shale:a case study of the shale in Chang 7 oil-bearing formation of Yanchang Formation,southeastern Ordos Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2018,39(2):141-151.
[31] JARVIE D M,HILL R J,RUBLE T E,et al.Unconventional shale-gas systems:the Mississippian Barnett Shale of north-central Texas as one model for thermogenic shale-gas assessment[J].AAPG Bulletin,2007,91(4):475-499.
[32] 童晓光,张光亚,王兆明,等.全球油气资源潜力与分布[J].石油勘探与开发,2018,45(4):727-736.
TONG Xiaoguang,ZHANG Guangya,WANG Zhaoming,et al.Distribution and potential of global oil and gas resources[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2018,45(4):727-736.
[33] 张君峰,毕海滨,许浩,等.国外致密油勘探开发新进展及借鉴意义[J].石油学报,2015,36(2):127-137.
ZHANG Junfeng,BI Haibin,XU Hao,et al.New progress and reference significance of overseas tight oil exploration and development[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2015,36(2):127-137.
[34] 周庆凡,金之钧,杨国丰,等.美国页岩油勘探开发现状与前景展望[J].石油与天然气地质,2019,40(3):469-477.
ZHOU Qingfan,JIN Zhijun,YANG Guofeng,et al.Shale oil exploration and production in the U.S.:status and outlook[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2019,40(3):469-477.
[35] 张新顺,王红军,马锋,等.致密油资源富集区与"甜点区"分布关系研究——以美国威利斯顿盆地为例[J].石油实验地质,2015,37(5):619-626.
ZHANG Xinshun,WANG Hongjun,MA Feng,et al.Relationship between resource-rich regions and sweet spots for tight oils:a case study of the Williston Basin in the USA[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2015,37(5):619-626.
[36] 匡立春,胡文瑄,王绪龙,等.吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组致密油储层初步研究:岩性与孔隙特征分析[J].高校地质学报,2013,19(3):529-535.
KUANG Lichun,HU Wenxuan,WANG Xulong,et al.Research of the tight oil reservoir in the Lucaogou Formation in Jimusar sag:analysis of lithology and porosity characteristics[J].Geological Journal of China Universities,2013,19(3):529-535.
[37] 陈桂华,肖钢,徐强,等.页岩油气地质评价方法和流程[J].天然气工业,2012,32(12):1-5.
CHEN Guihua,XIAO Gang,XU Qiang,et al.A method and workflow for shale oil and gas geological evaluation[J].Natural Gas Industry,2012,32(12):1-5.
[38] 柳波,何佳,吕延防,等.页岩油资源评价指标与方法——以松辽盆地北部青山口组页岩油为例[J].中南大学学报:自然科学版,2014,45(11):3846-3852.
LIU Bo,HE Jia,LÜ Yanfang,et al.Parameters and method for shale oil assessment:taking Qinshankou Formation shale oil of northern Songliao Basin[J].Journal of Central South University:Science and Technology,2014,45(11):3846-3852.
[39] 卢双舫,黄文彪,陈方文,等.页岩油气资源分级评价标准探讨[J].石油勘探与开发,2012,39(2):249-256.
LU Shuangfang,HUANG Wenbiao,CHEN Fangwen,et al.Classification and evaluation criteria of shale oil and gas resources:discussion and application[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2012,39(2):249-256.
[40] 宋国奇,张林晔,卢双舫,等.页岩油资源评价技术方法及其应用[J].地学前缘,2013,20(4):221-228.
SONG Guoqi,ZHANG Linye,LU Shuangfang,et al.Resource evaluation method for shale oil and its application[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2013,20(4):221-228.
[41] 吴松涛,邹才能,朱如凯,等.鄂尔多斯盆地上三叠统长7段泥页岩储集性能[J].地球科学:中国地质大学学报,2015,40(11):1810-1823.
WU Songtao,ZOU Caineng,ZHU Rukai,et al.Reservoir quality characterization of Upper Triassic Chang 7 shale in Ordos Basin[J].Earth Science:Journal of China University of Geosciences,2015,40(11):1810-1823.
[42] 杨智,侯连华,陶士振,等.致密油与页岩油形成条件与"甜点区"评价[J].石油勘探与开发,2015,42(5):555-565.
YANG Zhi,HOU Lianhua,TAO Shizhen,et al.Formation conditions and "sweet spot" evaluation of tight oil and shale oil[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2015,42(5):555-565.
[43] 张金川,林腊梅,李玉喜,等.页岩油分类与评价[J].地学前缘,2012,19(5):322-331.
ZHANG Jinchuan,LIN Lamei,LI Yuxi,et al.Classification and evaluation of shale oil[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2012,19(5):322-331.
[44] 谌卓恒,黎茂稳,姜春庆,等.页岩油的资源潜力及流动性评价方法——以西加拿大盆地上泥盆统Duvernay页岩为例[J].石油与天然气地质,2019,40(3):459-468.
CHEN Zhuoheng,LI Maowen,JIANG Chunqing,et al.Shale oil resource potential and its mobility assessment:a case study of Upper Devonian Duvernay shale in Western Canada sedimentary basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2019,40(3):459-468.
[45] 国家能源局.致密油气及页岩油气地质实验规程:SY/T 7311-2016[S].北京:国家能源局,2017.
National Energy Administration.Code for oil and gas geology of dense oil and gas and shale:SY/T 7311-2016[S].Beijing:National Energy Administration,2017.
[46] 中华人民共和国自然资源部.石油天然气储量估算规范:DZ/T 0217-2020[S].北京:自然资源部,2020.
Ministry of Natural Resources of the People's Republic of China.Regulation of petroleum reserves estimation:DZ/T 0217-2020[S].Beijing:Ministry of Natural Resources of the People's Republic of China,2020.
[47] 中国石油天然气集团公司.致密油储量计算规范:Q/SY 1834-2015[S].北京:中国石油天然气集团公司,2015.
China National Petroleum Corporation.Regulation of tight oil reserves estimation:Q/SY 1834-2015[S].Beijing:China National Petroleum Corporation,2015.
[48] 中华人民共和国国土资源部.页岩气资源/储量计算与评价技术规范:DZ/T 0254-2014[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2014.
Ministry of Land and Resources of the People's Republic of China.Regulation of shale gas resources/reserves estimation:DZ/T 0254-2014[S].Beijing:Standards Press of China,2014.
[49] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局.沉积岩中总有机碳的测定:GB/T 19145-2003[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2003.
General Administration of Quality Supervision,Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China.Determination of total organic carbon in sedimentary rock:GB/T 19145-2003[S].Beijing:Standards Press of China,2003.
[50] 国家石油和化学工业局.覆压下岩石孔隙度和渗透率测定方法:SY/T 6385-1999[S].北京:石油工业出版社,1999.
State Bureau of Petroleum and Chemical Industry.The porosity and permeability measurement of core in net confining stress:SY/T 6385-1999[S].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,1999.
[51] 赵文智,胡素云,侯连华,等.中国陆相页岩油类型、资源潜力及与致密油的边界[J].石油勘探与开发,2020,47(1):1-10.
ZHAO Wenzhi,HU Suyun,HOU Lianhua,et al.Types and resource potential of continental shale oil in China and its boundary with tight oil[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2020,47(1):1-10.
[52] 胡素云,赵文智,侯连华,等.中国陆相页岩油发展潜力与技术对策[J].石油勘探与开发,2020,47(4):819-828.
HU Suyun,ZHAO Wenzhi,HOU Lianhua,et al.Development potential and technical strategy of continental shale oil in China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2020,47(4):819-828.
[53] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会.岩心分析方法:GB/T 29172-2012[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2013.
General Administration of Quality Supervision,Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China,Standardization Administration of China.Practices for core analysis:GB/T 29172-2012[S].Beijing:Standards Press of China,2013.
[54] 国家能源局.油页岩含油率的测定格金法:NB/T 51011-2014[S].北京:新华出版社,2014.
National Energy Administration.Determination of oil content in oil shale Gray-king assay:NB/T 51011-2014[S].Beijing:Xinhua Publishing House,2014.
[55] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会.煤样的制备方法:GB 474-2008[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2009.
General Administration of Quality Supervision,Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China,Standardization Administration of China.Method for preparation of coal sample:GB 474-2008[S].Beijing:Standards Press of China,2009.
[56] 王强,彭平安,张文正,等.鄂尔多斯盆地延长组7段页岩全组分定量生烃模拟及原油可动性评价[J].石油学报,2018,39(5):541-553.
WANG Qiang,PENG Ping'an,ZHANG Wenzheng,et al.Quantitative full-component hydrocarbon-generating simulation and crude oil mobility evaluation of shale in 7th Member of Yanchang Formation,Ordos Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2018,39(5):541-553.
[57] 郭秋麟,米敬奎,王建,等.改进的烃源岩生烃潜力模型及关键参数模板[J].中国石油勘探,2019,24(5):661-669.
GUO Qiulin,MI Jingkui,WANG Jian,et al.An improved hydrocarbon generation model of source rocks and key parameter templates[J].China Petroleum Exploration,2019,24(5):661-669.
[58] 崔景伟,朱如凯,崔京钢.页岩孔隙演化及其与残留烃量的关系:来自地质过程约束下模拟实验的证据[J].地质学报,2013,87(5):730-736.
CUI Jingwei,ZHU Rukai,CUI Jinggang.Relationship of porous evolution and residual hydrocarbon:evidence from modeling experiment with geological constrains[J].Acta Geologica Sinica,2013,87(5):730-736.
[59] BROWN A A.Are gas shales suitable analogs for oil shale exploration?[C]//Proceedings of Southwest Section AAPG Annual Convention.Wichita Falls,Texas:AAPG,2015.
[60] JARVIE D M.Extended abstract:shale resource systems for oil and gas[M]//BREYER J.Shale Reservoirs:Giant Resources for the 21st Century.Tulsa:AAPG,2012:1-3.
[61] HAMEL K.A structural and geochemical traverse across the NW outcrop of the Colenso Fault Zone,Saldanha,South Africa[D].Cape Town:University of Cape Town,2015.
[62] ZOU Caineng,ZHAO Qun,DONG Dazhong,et al.Geological characteristics,main challenges and future prospect of shale gas[J].Journal of Natural Gas Geoscience,2017,2(5/6):273-288.
[63] 张林晔,包友书,李钜源,等.湖相页岩油可动性——以渤海湾盆地济阳坳陷东营凹陷为例[J].石油勘探与开发,2014,41(6):641-649.
ZHANG Linye,BAO Youshu,LI Juyuan,et al.Movability of lacustrine shale oil:a case study of Dongying sag,Jiyang depression,Bohai Bay Basin[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2014,41(6):641-649.
[64] 付金华.陇东地区低渗透油藏国家级示范区勘探开发关键技术研发与应用[R].西安:中国石油天然气股份有限公司长庆油田分公司,2017.
FU Jinhua.Research and development and application of key technologies of exploration and development in national demonstration area of low permeability reservoir in Longdong area[R].Xi'an:PetroChina Changqing Oilfield Company,2017.

陆相页岩油储层评价关键参数及方法

Key parameters and methods of lacustrine shale oil reservoir characterization

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 4

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	金之钧, 王冠平, 刘光祥, 高波, 刘全有, 王红亮, 梁新平, 王濡岳. 中国陆相页岩油研究进展与关键科学问题[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(7): 821-835.
[2]	李国欣, 吴志宇, 李桢, 陈强, 鲜成刚, 刘合. 陆相源内非常规石油甜点优选与水平井立体开发技术实践 ——以鄂尔多斯盆地延长组7段为例[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(6): 736-750.
[3]	赵贤正, 周立宏, 蒲秀刚, 时战楠, 韩国猛, 吴佳朋, 韩文中, 张伟, 高欢欢, 马建英, 汪虎. 歧口凹陷歧北次凹沙河街组三段页岩油地质特征与勘探突破[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(6): 643-657.
[4]	邹才能, 潘松圻, 荆振华, 高金亮, 杨智, 吴松涛, 赵群. 页岩油气革命及影响[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(1): 1-12.