燃气管道失效概率评估方法研究

doi:10.7623/syxb201004028

石油学报 ›› 2010, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (4): 664-667.DOI: 10.7623/syxb201004028

燃气管道失效概率评估方法研究

黄小美李百战彭世尼张家兰

重庆大学三峡库区生态环境教育部重点实验室重庆 400030

收稿日期:2010-01-15 修回日期:2010-03-22 出版日期:2010-07-25 发布日期:2010-09-25
通讯作者: 黄小美
作者简介:黄小美，男，1980年3月生，2008年获重庆大学工学博士学位，现为重庆大学讲师，主要从事天然气输配和利用的教学和科研工作。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（No.50908244）和重庆市自然科学基金项目（No.2009BB0357）联合资助。

Assessment methods of failure probability on gas pipelines

HUANG Xiaomei LI Baizhan PENG Shini ZHANG Jialan

Received:2010-01-15 Revised:2010-03-22 Online:2010-07-25 Published:2010-09-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

失效概率评估是燃气管道定量风险评估的关键内容之一。对基于专家估计的主观失效可能性评估方法和基于历史失效数据统计或强度理论的客观失效概率评估方法的优缺点进行了分析，提出了一种主观方法和客观方法相结合的失效概率评估方法。采用历史失效数据统计方法，计算燃气管道的平均失效概率；采用层次分析法，利用专家估计数据，求得管道失效可能性，并认为主观估计的中等可能性等于历史失效数据统计的平均失效概率，从而确定主观失效可能性和客观失效概率之间的关系式。以埋地钢质管道腐蚀失效为例，阐述了这种失效概率评估方法。采用主观估计法，求得任意情况下的管道失效可能性，利用主观可能性和客观概率之间的关系式，求出燃气管道的客观失效概率。

关键词: 燃气管道; , 失效概率; , 客观方法; , 主观方法, 腐蚀失效

Abstract:

The failure probability assessment (FPA) is one of the key quantitative risk assessments on gas pipes. The present paper analyzed both advantages and disadvantages of the subjective FPA method based on experts experience and the objective FPA method based on historical failure data or intensity theory, respectively. A new assessment method combined by the both subjective and objective methods was developed in this paper, and it adopted a statistic analysis on historical failure data to calculate an average failure probability of gas pipes and applied a hierarchy analysis on experts evaluation data to figure out a failure possibility of gas pipes. A relationship between the subjective failure possibility and objective failure probability was built up through this integrated analysis method that assumes the medium possibility of the subjective assessment equal to the average failure probability of the historical failure data. Taking the failure probability by corrosion on buried steel pipelines as an example, the paper expatiated upon this approach of the failure probability assessment, which firstly estimated the failure possibility of pipelines under any conditions via the subjective assessment, and then determined the objective failure probability of pipelines by means of the relationship between the subjective possibility and objective probability.

Key words: gas pipeline, failure probability, objective method, subjective method, corrosion failure

黄小美李百战彭世尼张家兰. 燃气管道失效概率评估方法研究[J]. 石油学报, 2010, 31(4): 664-667.

HUANG Xiaomei LI Baizhan PENG Shini ZHANG Jialan. Assessment methods of failure probability on gas pipelines[J]. Editorial office of ACTA PETROLEI SINICA, 2010, 31(4): 664-667.

参考文献

[1]Jo Y D,Crowl D A.Individual risk analysis of high-pressure natural gas pipelines[J].Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries,2008,21(6):589-595.

[2]翁永基.油气管道泄漏事故的定量风险评价[J].石油学报，2004，25(5):108-112. 

Weng Yongji.Quantitative risk assessment for failure of oil and gas pipelines[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2004,25(5):108-112.

[3]Montiel H,Vilchez J A,Arnaldos J,et al.Historical analysis of accidents in the transportation of natural gas[J].Journal of Hazardous Materials,1996,51(1/2/3):77-92.

[4]黄小美，彭世尼，王书淼，等.城镇燃气管道失效与事故数据库设计[J].煤气与热力，2009，29(1):B40-B43.

Huang Xiaomei,Peng Shini,Wang Shumiao,et al.Design of failure and accident database for city gas pipelines[J].Gas & Heat,2009,29(1):B40-B43.

[5]廖华林，管志川，闫振来，等.基于可靠性理论的套管失效风险评价方法[J].石油学报，2010，31(1):161-164,172.

Liao Hualin,Guan Zhichuan,Yan Zhenlai,et al.Assessment method of casing failure risk based on structure reliability theory

[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2010,31(1):161-164,172.

[6]余建星，祁世芳.一种新的输油管道可靠性分析方法[J].石油学报，2003，24(1):85-88.

Yu Jianxing,Qi Shifang.A new analysis method for evaluating reliability of oil pipelines[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2003,24(1):85-88.

[7]帅健，许葵.输油管道参数的统计分析与安全评定[J].石油学报，2002，23(3):86-90.

Shuai Jian,Xu Kui.Statistical analysis of parameters and safety assessment of oil pipeline[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2002,23(3):86-90.

[8]Muhlbauer W K.Pipeline risk management manual:Ideas,techniques,and resources[M].3th ed.Oxford:Gulf Professional Publishing,2004:37-39.

[9]Cagno E,Caron F,Mancini M,et al.Using AHP in determining the prior distributions on gas pipeline failures in a robust Bayesian approach[J].Reliability Engineering & System Safety,2000,67(3):275-284.

[10]黄小美，李百战，彭世尼，等.基于层次分析和模糊综合评判的管道风险评价[J].煤气与热力，2008,28(2):B13-B18.

Huang Xiaomei,Li Baizhan,Peng Shini,et al.Risk assessment of pipeline based on analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation[J].Gas & Heat,2008,28(2):B13-B18.

[11]Markowsik A S,Mannan M S.Fuzzy logic for piping risk assessment(pfLOPA) [J].Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries,2009,22(1):1-7.

[12]Dong Y H，Yu D T.Estimation of failure probability of oil and gas transmission pipelines by fuzzy fault tree analysis[J].Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries,2005,18(2):83-88.

[13]郭齐胜，杨秀月，王杏林，等.系统建模[M].北京：国防工业出版社，2006:292-299.

Guo Qisheng,Yang Xiuyue,Wang Xinglin,et al.System modeling[M].Beijing:National Defense Industry Press,2006:292-299.

[14]Onisawa T.Subjective analysis of system reliability and its analyzer[J].Fuzzy Sets and Systems,1996,83(2):249-269.

[15]黄小美.城市燃气管道系统定量风险评价及其应用研究[D].重庆：重庆大学，2008.

Huang Xiaomei.Study on quantitative risk assessment and its application for city gas pipelines[D].Chongqing:Chongqing University,2008.

燃气管道失效概率评估方法研究

Assessment methods of failure probability on gas pipelines

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 1

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价