页岩吸附性能及孔隙结构特征——以四川盆地龙马溪组页岩为例

doi:10.7623/syxb201305003

石油学报 ›› 2013, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (5): 826-832.DOI: 10.7623/syxb201305003

页岩吸附性能及孔隙结构特征——以四川盆地龙马溪组页岩为例

薛华庆^1,2,3,4, 王红岩^2,3,4, 刘洪林^2,3,4, 闫刚^2,3,4, 郭伟^2,3,4, 李小龙^2,3,4

1. 清华大学热能工程系北京 100084;
2. 中国石油勘探开发研究院廊坊分院河北廊坊 065007;
3. 中国石油天然气集团公司非常规油气重点实验室河北廊坊 065007;
4. 国家能源页岩气研发(实验)中心河北廊坊 065007

收稿日期:2013-03-26 修回日期:2013-06-26 出版日期:2013-09-25 发布日期:2013-08-01
通讯作者: 薛华庆
作者简介:薛华庆,男,1982年10月生,2005年获中国石油大学(华东)学士学位,现为中国石油勘探开发研究院廊坊分院工程师,清华大学博士研究生,主要从事页岩气储层实验测试技术研究。Email:hqxue@petrochina.com.cn
基金资助:
国家重大科技专项"页岩气勘探开发关键技术"(2011ZX05018)资助。

Adsorption capability and aperture distribution characteristics of shales：taking the Longmaxi Formation shale of Sichuan Basin as an example

XUE Huaqing^1,2,3,4, WANG Hongyan^2,3,4, LIU Honglin^2,3,4, YAN Gang^2,3,4, GUO Wei^2,3,4, LI Xiaolong^2,3,4

1. Department of Thermal Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China;
2. Langfang Branch, PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development, Langfang 065007, China;
3. CNPC Key Laboratory of Unconventional Oil & Gas, Langfang 065007, China;
4. National Energy Shale Gas Research & Development (Experimental) Center, Langfang 065007, China

Received:2013-03-26 Revised:2013-06-26 Online:2013-09-25 Published:2013-08-01

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

四川盆地昭通区块龙马溪组页岩的TOC含量和现场含气量测试显示,下段页岩含气性好,储层也具有可改造性。利用全岩及黏土矿物分析、等温吸附实验、比表面及孔径分布等实验研究,发现页岩中干酪根纳米级孔隙发育,孔径主要分布在2~60 nm,是页岩比表面的主要贡献者。页岩与干酪根的吸附-脱附曲线形态也说明了这一现象,两者基本相似,都具有明显的滞后环。而页岩中黏土也具有一定比表面积,其含量与页岩的比表面不存在相关性。因此,TOC含量增加,页岩的比表面积增大,吸附能力增强,饱和吸附量变大,使得含气量增加。

关键词: 页岩, 含气量, 吸附能力, 比表面, 孔径分布

Abstract:

TOCs of Longmaxi Formation source rocks and gas-content measurements of shale gas wells in the Zhaotong block, Sichuan Basin showed that the gas content of lower-interval shales is better and the brittleness index of lower-interval reservoirs also indicated adjacent shale formations suitable for stimulation. Based on bulk rock and clay mineral analyses as well as experiments of isothermal adsorption, specific surface areas and aperture distributions, the organic matter (kerogen) in shales was found abundant in well-developed nano-pores with an aperture of 2-60nm, which are major contributors to the specific surface area of shales. This can be also implied by the adsorption and desorption curves of kerogens to and from shales because the shape of the curves is generally alike, having a hysteresis loop. However, the clay in shales shows a certain specific surface area whose content has no relationship with the specific surface area of shales. Therefore, with the increase of TOC, the specific surface area of shales increases and their adsorption capacity strengthens as well, resulting in an increase in the saturated adsorption capability and gas content.

Key words: shale, gas content, adsorption capability, specific surface area, aperture distribution

中图分类号:

TE112.222

薛华庆, 王红岩, 刘洪林, 闫刚, 郭伟, 李小龙. 页岩吸附性能及孔隙结构特征——以四川盆地龙马溪组页岩为例[J]. 石油学报, 2013, 34(5): 826-832.

XUE Huaqing, WANG Hongyan, LIU Honglin, YAN Gang, GUO Wei, LI Xiaolong. Adsorption capability and aperture distribution characteristics of shales：taking the Longmaxi Formation shale of Sichuan Basin as an example[J]. Editorial office of ACTA PETROLEI SINICA, 2013, 34(5): 826-832.

参考文献

[1] 董大忠,邹才能,杨桦,等.中国页岩气勘探开发进展与发展前景[J].石油学报,2012,33(S1):107-114.
Dong Dazhong,Zou Caineng,Yang Hua,et al.Progress and prospects of shale gas exploration and development in China[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2012,33(S1):107-114.
[2] 陈尚斌,朱炎铭,王红岩,等.中国页岩气研究现状与发展趋势[J].石油学报,2012,31(4):689-694.
Chen Shangbin,Zhu Yanming,Wang Hongyan,et al.Research status and trends of shale gas in China[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2012,31(4):689-694.
[3] Montgomery S L,Jarvie D M,Bowker K A,et al.Mississippian Barnett Shale,Fort Worth basin,north-central Texas:Gas-shale play with multi-trillion cubic foot potential[J].AAPG Bulletin,2005,89(2):155-175.
[4] Bustin R M.Gas shale tapped for big pay[R].AAPG Explorer,2005.
[5] Ross D J K,Bustin R M.Shale gas potential of the Lower Jurassic Gordondale Member,northeastern British Columbia,Canada[J].Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology,2007,55(1):51-75.
[6] Ross D J K,Bustin R M.Characterizing the shale gas resource potential of Devonian-Mississippian strata in the Western Canada sedimentary basin:application of an integrated formation evaluation[J].AAPG Bulletin,2008,92(1):87-125.
[7] Pollastro R M.Total petroleum system assessment of undiscovered resources in the giant Barnett Shale continuous (unconventional) gas accumulation,Fort Worth Basin,Texas[J].AAPG Bulletin,2007,91(4):551-578.
[8] 邹才能,朱如凯,白斌,等.中国油气储层中纳米孔首次发现及其科学价值[J].岩石学报,2011,27(6):1857-1864.
Zou Caineng,Zhu Rukai,Bai Bin,et al.First discovery of nano-pore throat in oil and gas reservoir in China and its scientific value[J].Acta Petrologica Sinica,2011,27(6):1857-1864.
[9] 张雪芬,陆现彩,张林晔,等.页岩气的赋存形式研究及其石油地质意义[J].地球科学进展,2010,25(6):597-604.
Zhang Xuefen,Lu Xiancai,Zhang Linye,et al.Occurrences of shale gas and their petroleum geological significance[J].Advances in Earth Science,2010,25(6):597-604.
[10] 吉利明,邱军利,夏燕青,等.常见黏土矿物电镜扫描微孔隙特征与甲烷吸附性[J].石油学报,2012,33(2):249-256.
Ji Liming,Qiu Junli,Xia Yanqing,et al.Micro-pore characteristics and methane adsorption properties of common clay minerals by electron microscope scanning[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2012,33(2):249-256.
[11] Kate J M,Gokhale C S.A simple method to estimate complete pore size distribution of rocks[J].Engineering Geology,2006,84(1/2):48-69.
[12] Fakhimi A,Alavi Gharahbagh E.Discrete element analysis of the effect of pore size and pore distribution on the mechanical behavior of rock[J].International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences,2011,48(1):77-85.
[13] Ross D K,Bustin R M.The importance of shale composition and pore structure upon gas storage potential of shale gas reservoirs[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,2009,26(6):916-927.
[14] Clarksona C R,Bustinb R M.The effect of pore structure and gas pressure upon the transport properties of coal:a laboratory and modeling study.1.Isotherms and pore volume distributions[J].Fuel,1999,78(11):1333-1344.
[15] 田华,张水昌,刘少波,等.压汞法和气体吸附法研究富有机质页岩孔隙特征[J].石油学报,2012,33(3):419-427.
Tian Hua,Zhang Shuichang,Liu Shaobo,et al.Determination of organic-rich shale pore features by mercury injection and gas adsorption methods[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2012,33(3):419-427.
[16] 谢晓永,唐洪明,王春华,等.氮气吸附法和压汞法在测试泥页岩孔径分布中的对比[J].天然气工业2006,26(12):100-102.
Xie Xiaoyong,Tang Hongming,Wang Chunhua,et al.Contrast of nitrogen adsorption method and mercury porosimetry method in analysis of shale's pore size distribution[J].Natural Gas Industry,2006,26(12):100-102.
[17] Langmuir I.The adsorption of gases on plane surfaces of glass,mica and platinum[J].Journal of the American Chemical Society,1918,40(1):1361-1403.
[18] Brunauer S,Emmett P H,Teller E.Adsorption of gases in multimolecular layers[J].Journal of the American Chemical Society,1938,60(2):309-319.
[19] International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry.Manual of symbols and terminology[J].Pure and Applied Chemistry,1972,31(3):578.
[20] Barrett E P,Joyner L G,Halenda P H.The determination of pore volume and area distributions in porous substances.I.Computations from nitrogen isotherms[J].Journal of the American Chemical Society,1951,73(1):373-380.
[21] 钱家麟,尹亮,王剑秋,等.油页岩——石油的补充能源[M].北京:中国石化出版社,2008.
Qian Jialin,Yin Liang,Wang Jianqiu,et al.Oil shale——Supplementary energy of petroleum[M].Beijing:China Petrochemical Press,2008.
[22] 蒋裕强,董大忠,漆麟,等.页岩气储层的基本特征及其评价[J].天然气工业,2010,30(10):7-12.
Jiang Yuqiang,Dong Dazhong,Qi Lin,et al.Basic features and evaluation of shale gas reservoirs[J].Natural Gas Industry,2010,30(10):7-12.
[23] Barree R.Introduction to Gohfer and Stimulation Design[R].Internal publication.Barree and Associates,2002.
[24] 邹才能,董大忠,王社教,等.中国页岩气形成机理、地质特征及资源潜力[J].石油勘探与开发,2010,37(6):641-653.
Zou Caineng,Dong Dazhong,Wang Shejiao,et al.Geological characteristics,formation mechanism and resource potential of shale gas in China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2010,37(6):641-653.
[25] 李玉喜,乔德武,姜文利,等.页岩气含气量和页岩气地质评价综述[J].地质通报,2011,30(2/3):308-317.
Li Yuxi,Qiao Dewu,Jiang Wenli,et al.Gas content of gas-bearing shale and its geological evaluation summary[J].Geological Bulletin of China,2011,30(2/3):308-317.
[26] 近藤精一,石川达雄,安部郁夫.吸附科学[M].第2版.李国希译.北京:化学工业出版社,2007:31-36.
Jinteng Jingyi,Shichuan Daxiong,Anpei Yufu.Adsorption science[M].2nd edition,Translated by Li Guoxi.Beijing:Chemical Industry Press,2007:31-36.
[27] 赵杏媛,张有瑜.粘土矿物与粘土矿物分析[M].北京:海洋出版社,1990.
Zhao Xinyuan,Zhang Youyu.Clay mineral and clay mineral analysis[M].Beijing:Ocean Press,1990.
[28] 王行信,周书欣.有机黏土化学在油气生成研究中的意义[J].地质地球化学,1991,19(5):3-8.
Wang Hangxin,Zhou Shuxin.The signification of organic clay chemistry in hydrocarbon generation[J].Geology-Geochemistry,1991,19(5):3-8.
[29] Bergamaschi B A,Tsamakis E,Keil R G,et al.The effect of grain size and surface area on organic matter,lignin and carbohydrate concentration,and molecular compositions in Peru Margin sediments[J].Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta,1997,61(6):1247-1260.
[30] 傅积平,张敬森,熊毅.太湖地区水稻土复合胶体的特性[J].土壤学报,1982,19(2):112-127.
Fu Jiping,Zhang Jinshen,Xiong Yi.The properties of colloidal complexes of paddy soils in Taihu lake region[J].Acta Pedologica Sinica,1982,19(2):112-127.

页岩吸附性能及孔隙结构特征——以四川盆地龙马溪组页岩为例

Adsorption capability and aperture distribution characteristics of shales：taking the Longmaxi Formation shale of Sichuan Basin as an example

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	何文渊, 崔宝文, 张金友, 赵莹, 程心阳, 刘召, 刘鑫, 曾花森. 松辽盆地北部嫩江组中—低成熟页岩油地质特征及勘探突破[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(6): 900-913.
[2]	刘胜男, 朱如凯, 靳军, 张婧雅. 油气运移约束陆相页岩油富集——以准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组为例[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(6): 932-946.
[3]	王鑫, 蒙启安, 白云风, 张金友, 王民, 刘召, 孙先达, 李进步, 许承武, 徐亮, 邓仔晓, 吴艳, 卢双舫. 页岩储集性与含油性的毫米级精细评价及意义——以松辽盆地青山口组一段为例[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(6): 961-975.
[4]	解德录, 赵贤正, 金凤鸣, 蒲秀刚, 韩文中, 时战楠, 张伟, 董雄英. 沧东凹陷深湖亚相纹层状页岩成因及页岩油可动性影响因素[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(5): 804-816.
[5]	熊钰, 郭美娟, 王羚鸿, 吴道铭, 陈美华, 李明秋, 邓波, 张芮, 路俊刚, 曾德铭. 四川盆地侏罗系大安寨段页岩油特征及可动性评价[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(5): 817-843.
[6]	侯连华, 米敬奎, 罗霞, 于志超, 林森虎, 廖凤荣, 庞正炼, 赵忠英. 压力对页岩原位加热产出油气特征的影响——以鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组7段3亚段页岩为例[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(4): 629-641.
[7]	杨勇, 张世明, 吕琦, 杜玉山, 李伟忠, 程紫燕, 吕晶, 刘祖鹏. 中国东部陆相断陷盆地中—低成熟度页岩油立体开发技术——以济阳坳陷古近系沙河街组为例[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(4): 672-682,697.
[8]	何永宏, 李桢, 樊建明, 张超, 张旭泽, 马兵. 鄂尔多斯盆地页岩油开发井网优化技术及实践——以庆城油田为例[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(4): 683-697.
[9]	梁兴, 单长安, 张磊, 罗瑀峰, 蒋立伟, 张介辉, 朱斗星, 舒红林, 李健. 四川盆地渝西地区大安深层页岩气田的勘探发现及成藏条件[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(3): 477-499.
[10]	惠沙沙, 庞雄奇, 谌卓恒, 王琛茜, 施砍园, 胡涛, 胡耀, 李敏, 梅术星, 黎茂稳. 四川盆地海相页岩孔隙类型对孔隙空间贡献定量表征[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(3): 531-547.
[11]	武晓光, 龙腾达, 黄中伟, 高文龙, 李根生, 谢紫霄, 杨芮, 鲁京松, 马金亮. 页岩油多岩性交互储层径向井穿层压裂裂缝扩展特征[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(3): 559-573,585.
[12]	宋兆杰, 邓森, 宋宜磊, 刘勇, 鲜成钢, 张江, 韩啸, 曹胜, 付兰清, 崔焕琦. 大庆油田古龙页岩油-CO₂高压相态及传质规律[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(2): 390-402.
[13]	吴宝成, 吴承美, 谭强, 褚艳杰, 梁成钢, 李文波, 张金风, 陈依伟, 徐田录, 王良哲. 准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷昌吉页岩油成藏条件及勘探开发关键技术[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(2): 437-460.
[14]	李乐, 胡远清, 彭小桂, 王伟, 余浩宇, 崔亚圣. 页岩气藏中硫化氢成因研究进展[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(2): 461-476.
[15]	宋永, 唐勇, 何文军, 龚德瑜, 晏奇, 陈棡, 单祥, 刘超威, 刘刚, 秦志军, 阿布力米提·依明, 尤新才, 任海姣, 白雨, 高岗. 准噶尔盆地油气勘探新领域、新类型及勘探潜力[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(1): 52-68.