预加压测试页岩含气量新方法

doi:10.7623/syxb201710009

石油学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (10): 1189-1193,1199.DOI: 10.7623/syxb201710009

预加压测试页岩含气量新方法

姚光华¹, 熊伟², 胥云², 王晓泉¹, 宜伟¹, 董卫军¹, 杜宏宇¹, 龚齐森¹

1. 重庆矿产资源开发有限公司重庆 401123;
2. 中国石油勘探开发研究院廊坊分院河北廊坊 065007

收稿日期:2016-10-13 修回日期:2017-07-10 出版日期:2017-10-25 发布日期:2017-11-02
通讯作者: 熊伟,男,1971年12月生,1994年获西南石油学院学士学位,2010年获中国科学院渗流力学所博士学位,现为中国石油勘探开发研究院高级工程师,主要从事低渗透致密油气藏开发基础理论研究.Email:xiongwei69@petrochina.com.cn
作者简介:姚光华,男,1963年5月生,1986年获西安矿业学院煤田地质与勘探专业学士学位,现为重庆矿产资源开发有限公司高级工程师,主要从事页岩气、煤层气等非常规能源综合研究及勘探管理工作.Email:yiwei19831113@163.com
基金资助:
国家重大科技专项（2011ZX05018-005）资助。

A new method of pre-pressurized test on shale gas content

Yao Guanghua¹, Xiong Wei², Xu Yun², Wang Xiaoquan¹, Yi Wei¹, Dong Weijun¹, Du Hongyu¹, Gong Qisen¹

1. Chongqing Mineral Resources Development Co. Ltd., Chongqing 401123, China;
2. Langfang Branch, PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Hebei Langfang 065007, China

Received:2016-10-13 Revised:2017-07-10 Online:2017-10-25 Published:2017-11-02

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

页岩含气量是页岩气藏储量计算的重要参数，对气藏评价和开发指标计算有重要意义。现场解吸是测试页岩含气量的主要方法，但由于损失气量占含气量的40 % ~80 % ，使传统方法的测试结果饱受质疑。结合国内外新的测试方法，提出了一种预加压测试页岩含气量的新方法，可以规避损失气量的计算，大幅度提高测试精度。在井场，将岩心置于高压罐内，用增压泵将甲烷注入岩心直至压力达到预定压力，在储层温度下，待压力稳定后解吸测试页岩含气量。该方法对于是否已知储层压力的不同情况，采取不同的测试流程。如果已知储层压力，预加压使岩心压力达到储层压力，解吸结果就是页岩含气量；如果储层压力未知，则可通过建立页岩含气量计算理论公式求解。测试流程为先对1个岩心开展超过吸附饱和压力的2次加压（压力均超过20 MPa）及解吸测试，然后利用理论公式和2次加压解吸结果，得到单位质量页岩内的吸附气量和任意压力下的游离气量计算公式。在后期测试出储层压力后，根据游离气计算公式，计算出该压力下的游离气量，游离气量与吸附气量之和即为页岩的含气量。

关键词: 页岩, 含气量, 损失气, 吸附气, 预加压

Abstract:

Shale gas content is an important parameter for shale gas reservoir reserve estimation, which is of great significance to the evaluation of gas reservoir and the calculation of development index. Field desorption is a major method for measuring shale gas content, and the lost gas volume accounts for 40 % -80 % of shale gas content. However, the test results of such conventional method are quite questionable. In this study, based on the new test methods a new pre-pressurizing method was proposed to measure shale gas content, which could avoid calculating the lost gas volume and greatly increased the test accuracy. At well site, the cores were placed in a high-pressure container, pressurized to a given pressure by injecting methane by booster pump; under the formation temperature, the shale gas content was desorbed and tested till the pressure stabilizes. This method adopt two different processes in two cases, i.e., whether the formation pressure is known or not before experiment. If the formation pressure is known, the cores are pre-pressurized to reach formation pressure, and the desorption result is exactly the shale gas content. If the formation pressure is unknown, a theoretical model is established to calculate shale gas content. The test process is as below:firstly, a core is pressurized twice to exceed the adsorbed saturation pressure (over 20 MPa)for desorption test, then the desorption results of twice pressurizations are used to solve the theoretical equation and obtain the calculation equations of adsorbed gas volume for a unit mass of shale and the free gas volume under any pressure. When the formation pressure is tested later, the calculation equation of free gas is adopted to calculate the free gas volume under this pressure, and the sum of free gas volume and absorbed gas volume is equal to shale gas content.

Key words: shale, gas content, lost gas, adsorbed gas, pre-pressurizing

中图分类号:

TE135

姚光华, 熊伟, 胥云, 王晓泉, 宜伟, 董卫军, 杜宏宇, 龚齐森. 预加压测试页岩含气量新方法[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38(10): 1189-1193,1199.

Yao Guanghua, Xiong Wei, Xu Yun, Wang Xiaoquan, Yi Wei, Dong Weijun, Du Hongyu, Gong Qisen. A new method of pre-pressurized test on shale gas content[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2017, 38(10): 1189-1193,1199.

参考文献

[1] 聂海宽,金之钧,边瑞康,等. 四川盆地及其周缘上奥陶统五峰组—下志留统龙马溪组页岩气"源-盖控藏"富集[J].石油学报,2016,37(5):557-571.
NIE Haikuan,JIN Zhijun,BIAN Ruikang,et al.The "source-cap hydrocarbon-controlling" enrichment of shale gas in upper Ordovician Wufeng Formation-Lower Silurian Longmaxi formation of Sichuan basin and its periphery[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2016,37(5):557-571.
[2] 秦华,范小军,刘明,等.焦石坝地区龙马溪组页岩解吸气地球化学特征及地质意义[J].石油学报,2016,37(7):846-854.
QIN Hua,FAN Xiaojun,LIU Ming,et al.Geochemical characteristics and geological significance of desorbed shale gas in Longmaxi Formation,Jiaoshiba area[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2016,37(7):846-854.
[3] 鲍云杰.从煤层含气量测定技术发展看页岩含气性评价的发展方向[J].石油实验地质,2014,36(6):762-766.
BAO Yunjie.Prospect of shale gas evaluation in view of measurement techniques development of coal seam gas content[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2014,36(6):762-766.
[4] 唐颖,张金川,刘珠江,等.解吸法测量页岩含气量及其方法的改进[J].天然气工业,2011,31(10):108-112.
TANG Ying,ZHANG Jinchuan,LIU Zhujiang,et al.Use and improvement of the desorption method in shale gas content tests[J].Natural Gas Industry,2011,31(10):108-112.
[5] 范明.中国石化无锡石油地质研究所实验地质技术之页岩含气量现场测量[J].石油实验地质,2013,35(2):112.
FAN Ming.Sinopec field measurement of shale gas content in experimental geological technology of Wuxi Institute of petroleum geology[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2013,35(2):112.
[6] 赵希春,朱金堂,刘振东,等.便携式快速解吸仪的研制[J].石油仪器,2012,26(3):30-31.
ZHAO Xichun,ZHU Jintang,LIU Zhendong,et al.Development of portable rapid analytical instrument[J].Petroleum Instruments,2012,26(3):30-31.
[7] 薛晓辉,岳小金,韦巍.页岩含气量测定过程中的几点建议[J].中国煤炭地质,2013,25(4):27-29.
XUE Xiaohui,YUE Xiaojin,WEI Wei.Some suggestions in shale gas content measuring process[J].Coal Geology of China,2013,25(4):27-29.
[8] 胡微雪,薛晓辉,李维,等.页岩含气量测定方法分析与优化[J].中外能源,2014,19(11):61-65.
HU Weixue,XUE Xiaohui,LI Wei,et al.Analysis and optimization on determination method of gas content of the shale[J].Sino-Global Energy,2014,19(11):61-65.
[9] 刘洪林,邓泽,刘德勋,等.页岩含气量测试中有关损失气量估算方法[J].石油钻采工艺,2010,32(增刊1):156-158.
LIU Honglin,DENG Ze,LIU Dexun,et al.Discussion on lost gas calculating methods in shale gas content testing[J].Oil Drilling & Production Technology,2010,32(S1):156-158.
[10] 邢雅文,张金川,冯赫青,等.页岩含气量测试方法改进效果分析[J].断块油气田,2015,22(5):579-583.
XING Yawen,ZHANG Jinchuan,FENG Heqing,et al.Effectiveness analysis of determination method for shale gas content[J].Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field,2015,22(5):579-583.
[11] 姚光华,王晓泉,杜宏宇,等.USBM方法在页岩气含气量测试中的适应性[J].石油学报,2016,37(6):802-806.
YAO Guanghua,WANG Xiaoquan,DU Hongyu,et al.Applicability of USBM method in the test on shale gas content[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2016,37(6):802-806.
[12] BERTARD C,BRUYET B,GUNTHER J.Determination of desorbable gas concentration of coal (direct method)[J].International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts,1970,7 (1):43-65.
[13] WAECHTER N B,HAMPTON Ⅲ G L,SHIPPS J C.Overview of coal and shale gas measurement:field and laboratory procedures[C]//Proceedings of the 2004 International Coalbed Methane Symposium.Tuscaloosa,Alabama:The University of Alabama,2004.
[14] SHTEPANI E,NOLL L A,ELROD L W,et al.A new regression-based method for accurate measurement of coal and shale gas content[J].SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering,2010,13(2):359-364.
[15] ULERY J P,HYMAN D M.The modified direct method of gas content determination—applications and results[C]//Proceedings of the 1991 Coalbed Methane Symposium.Tuscaloosa,Alabama:The University of Alabama,1991:13-17.
[16] 魏强,晏波,肖贤明.页岩气解吸方法研究进展[J].天然气地球科学,2015,26(9):1657-1665.
WEI Qiang,YAN Bo,XIAO Xianming.Research progress on the desorption methods of shale gas[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2015,26(9):1657-1665.
[17] 俞凌杰,范明,陈红宇,等.富有机质页岩高温高压重量法等温吸附实验[J].石油学报,2015,36(5):557-563.
YU Lingjie,FAN Ming,CHEN Hongyu,et al.Isothermal adsorption experiment of organic-rich shale under high temperature and pressure using gravimetric method[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2015,36(5):557-563.
[18] 左罗,王玉普,熊伟,等.页岩含气量计算新方法[J].石油学报,2015,36(4):469-474.
Z UO Luo,WANG Yupu,XIONG Wei,et al.A new method to calculate the shale gas content[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2015,36(4):469-474.
[19] MURATA K,KANEKO K.Nano-range interfacial layer upon high-pressure adsorption of supercritical gases[J]. Chemical Physics Letters,2000,321(5/6):342-348.

预加压测试页岩含气量新方法

A new method of pre-pressurized test on shale gas content

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	何文渊, 崔宝文, 张金友, 赵莹, 程心阳, 刘召, 刘鑫, 曾花森. 松辽盆地北部嫩江组中—低成熟页岩油地质特征及勘探突破[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(6): 900-913.
[2]	刘胜男, 朱如凯, 靳军, 张婧雅. 油气运移约束陆相页岩油富集——以准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组为例[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(6): 932-946.
[3]	王鑫, 蒙启安, 白云风, 张金友, 王民, 刘召, 孙先达, 李进步, 许承武, 徐亮, 邓仔晓, 吴艳, 卢双舫. 页岩储集性与含油性的毫米级精细评价及意义——以松辽盆地青山口组一段为例[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(6): 961-975.
[4]	解德录, 赵贤正, 金凤鸣, 蒲秀刚, 韩文中, 时战楠, 张伟, 董雄英. 沧东凹陷深湖亚相纹层状页岩成因及页岩油可动性影响因素[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(5): 804-816.
[5]	熊钰, 郭美娟, 王羚鸿, 吴道铭, 陈美华, 李明秋, 邓波, 张芮, 路俊刚, 曾德铭. 四川盆地侏罗系大安寨段页岩油特征及可动性评价[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(5): 817-843.
[6]	侯连华, 米敬奎, 罗霞, 于志超, 林森虎, 廖凤荣, 庞正炼, 赵忠英. 压力对页岩原位加热产出油气特征的影响——以鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组7段3亚段页岩为例[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(4): 629-641.
[7]	杨勇, 张世明, 吕琦, 杜玉山, 李伟忠, 程紫燕, 吕晶, 刘祖鹏. 中国东部陆相断陷盆地中—低成熟度页岩油立体开发技术——以济阳坳陷古近系沙河街组为例[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(4): 672-682,697.
[8]	何永宏, 李桢, 樊建明, 张超, 张旭泽, 马兵. 鄂尔多斯盆地页岩油开发井网优化技术及实践——以庆城油田为例[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(4): 683-697.
[9]	梁兴, 单长安, 张磊, 罗瑀峰, 蒋立伟, 张介辉, 朱斗星, 舒红林, 李健. 四川盆地渝西地区大安深层页岩气田的勘探发现及成藏条件[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(3): 477-499.
[10]	惠沙沙, 庞雄奇, 谌卓恒, 王琛茜, 施砍园, 胡涛, 胡耀, 李敏, 梅术星, 黎茂稳. 四川盆地海相页岩孔隙类型对孔隙空间贡献定量表征[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(3): 531-547.
[11]	武晓光, 龙腾达, 黄中伟, 高文龙, 李根生, 谢紫霄, 杨芮, 鲁京松, 马金亮. 页岩油多岩性交互储层径向井穿层压裂裂缝扩展特征[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(3): 559-573,585.
[12]	宋兆杰, 邓森, 宋宜磊, 刘勇, 鲜成钢, 张江, 韩啸, 曹胜, 付兰清, 崔焕琦. 大庆油田古龙页岩油-CO₂高压相态及传质规律[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(2): 390-402.
[13]	吴宝成, 吴承美, 谭强, 褚艳杰, 梁成钢, 李文波, 张金风, 陈依伟, 徐田录, 王良哲. 准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷昌吉页岩油成藏条件及勘探开发关键技术[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(2): 437-460.
[14]	李乐, 胡远清, 彭小桂, 王伟, 余浩宇, 崔亚圣. 页岩气藏中硫化氢成因研究进展[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(2): 461-476.
[15]	宋永, 唐勇, 何文军, 龚德瑜, 晏奇, 陈棡, 单祥, 刘超威, 刘刚, 秦志军, 阿布力米提·依明, 尤新才, 任海姣, 白雨, 高岗. 准噶尔盆地油气勘探新领域、新类型及勘探潜力[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(1): 52-68.