渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷沙河街组三段下亚段细粒沉积岩岩相特征与沉积演化

doi:10.7623/syxb202103003

石油学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (3): 293-306.DOI: 10.7623/syxb202103003

渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷沙河街组三段下亚段细粒沉积岩岩相特征与沉积演化

张建国^1,2, 姜在兴¹, 刘立安³, 袁方⁴, 冯路尧¹, 李长昇¹

1. 中国地质大学(北京)能源学院北京 100083;
2. 自然资源部页岩气资源战略评价重点实验室北京 100083;
3. 东北大学秦皇岛分校资源与材料学院河北秦皇岛 066004;
4. 中国石油长庆油田公司第九采油厂地质研究所宁夏银川 750006

收稿日期:2020-03-20 修回日期:2021-01-13 出版日期:2021-03-25 发布日期:2021-04-09
通讯作者: 张建国,男,1989年1月生,2011年获中国石油大学(北京)学士学位,2017年获中国地质大学(北京)博士学位,现为中国地质大学(北京)副教授、博士生导师,主要从事含油气细粒沉积学及页岩储层的研究工作。
作者简介:张建国,男,1989年1月生,2011年获中国石油大学(北京)学士学位,2017年获中国地质大学(北京)博士学位,现为中国地质大学(北京)副教授、博士生导师,主要从事含油气细粒沉积学及页岩储层的研究工作。Email:zhjianguo@cugb.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（No.41802130）和国家科技重大专项（2017ZX05009-02）资助。

Lithofacies and depositional evolution of fine-grained sedimentary rocks in the lower submember of the Member 3 of Shahejie Formation in Zhanhua sag, Bohai Bay Basin

Zhang Jianguo^1,2, Jiang Zaixing¹, Liu Li'an³, Yuan Fang⁴, Feng Luyao¹, Li Changsheng¹

1. College of Energy Resources, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Strategy Evaluation for Shale Gas, Ministry of Natural Resources, Beijing 100083, China;
3. College of Resources and Materials, Northeastern University at Qinhuangdao, Hebei Qinhuangdao 066004, China;
4. Geological Institute of No. 9 Oil Production Plant, PetroChina Changqing Oilfield Company, Ningxia Yinchuan 750006, China

Received:2020-03-20 Revised:2021-01-13 Online:2021-03-25 Published:2021-04-09

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷沙河街组三段（沙三段）下亚段页岩油勘探潜力巨大，目前对其岩相类型及其分布规律、沉积背景认识不清，制约了页岩油的勘探突破。利用岩心和X射线衍射、元素地球化学、有机地球化学等高精度测试资料，通过识别细粒沉积岩的岩相类型，恢复了古沉积环境，并探讨了沉积环境演变约束下的岩相分布规律。沉积古环境的变化控制了不同岩相类型的垂向分布及演化。沾化凹陷沙三段下亚段沉积环境自下而上划分为5个演化阶段，分别发育沉积藻灰岩、纹层状泥灰岩、纹层状重结晶灰岩、纹层状灰质泥岩和块状灰质泥岩。阶段Ⅰ—阶段Ⅲ，古气候相对干旱，陆源输入作用弱，沉积物以湖盆自生的灰岩为主，湖盆水体深度和盐度的变化控制了不同灰岩的变化；阶段Ⅳ，古气候转为湿热，陆源输入作用增强，沉积了陆源成因具年纹层构造的纹层状灰质泥岩；阶段Ⅴ，古气候最为湿热，陆源输入作用最强，发育大量浊流成因的块状灰质泥岩。垂向上，纹层状灰质泥岩的TOC含量最高、含油性最好。研究认识可为进一步厘清沾化凹陷沙三段细粒沉积岩储层非均质性的形成机制和页岩油甜点预测提供理论支撑。

关键词: 沾化凹陷, 细粒沉积岩, 岩相, 沉积环境, 页岩油

Abstract: Shale oil in the lower submember of the Member 3 of Shahejie Formation in Zhanhua sag of Bohai Bay Basin has huge exploration potential. At present, there is less understanding of its lithofacies type, distribution law, and sedimentary background, which restricts the breakthrough in shale oil exploration in this area. Using high-precision test data such as core and X-ray diffraction, elementary geochemistry, organic geochemistry, this paper identifies the lithofacies types of fine-grained sedimentary rocks, restores the sedimentary environment, and explores the distribution law of lithofacies in the evolution process of depositional environment. The vertical distribution and evolution of different lithofacies types is controlled by changes in the sedimentary environment. The evolution of the sedimentary environment of the lower submember of Member 3 of Shahejie Formation in Zhanhua sag is divided into five stages from bottom to top, with the deposition of algal limestone, laminar marlstone, laminar sparite, laminar lime mudstone and massive lime mudstone, respectively. In the stages Ⅰ to stage Ⅲ, the climate was relatively arid, the terrestrial input was weak, authigenic limestone deposits in the lake basin was mainly developed; changes in the water depth and salinity of the lake basin controlled the variations in different limestone lithofacies. In the stage Ⅳ, the climate became hot and humid, the terrestrial input was enhanced, and the laminar lime mudstone originated from terrigenous annual layers was deposited. In the stage Ⅴ, the climate was the hottest and dampest, when the terrestrial input was strongest, and a large number of massive lime mudstones formed by turbidity current were developed. Vertically, the laminar lime mudstone has the highest TOC content and the optimal oiliness. The research results can provide a theoretical support for further clarifying the difference mechanism of the heterogeneity of fine-grained sedimentary rock reservoirs, and predicting the sweet spots of shale oil in the study area.

Key words: Zhanhua sag, fine-grained sedimentary rocks, lithofacies, depositional environment, shale oil

中图分类号:

TE121.3

张建国, 姜在兴, 刘立安, 袁方, 冯路尧, 李长昇. 渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷沙河街组三段下亚段细粒沉积岩岩相特征与沉积演化[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(3): 293-306.

Zhang Jianguo, Jiang Zaixing, Liu Li'an, Yuan Fang, Feng Luyao, Li Changsheng. Lithofacies and depositional evolution of fine-grained sedimentary rocks in the lower submember of the Member 3 of Shahejie Formation in Zhanhua sag, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2021, 42(3): 293-306.

参考文献

[1] APLIN A C,MACQUAKER J S H.Mudstone diversity:origin and implications for source,seal,and reservoir properties in petroleum systems[J].AAPG Bulletin,2011,95(12):2031-2059.
[2] 姜在兴,梁超,吴靖,等.含油气细粒沉积岩研究的几个问题[J].石油学报,2013,34(6):1031-1039.
JIANG Zaixing,LIANG Chao,WU Jing,et al.Several issues in sedimentological studies on hydrocarbon-bearing fine-grained sedimentary rocks[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2013,34(6):1031-1039.
[3] 赵文智,胡素云,侯连华,等.中国陆相页岩油类型、资源潜力及与致密油的边界[J].石油勘探与开发,2020,47(1):1-10.
ZHAO Wenzhi,HU Suyun,HOU Lianhua,et al.Types and resource potential of continental shale oil in China and its boundary with tight oil[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2020,47(1):1-10.
[4] 郭旭升,李宇平,腾格尔,等.四川盆地五峰组-龙马溪组深水陆棚相页岩生储机理探讨[J].石油勘探与开发,2020,47(1):193-201.
GUO Xusheng,LI Yuping,BORJIGEN Tenger,et al.Hydrocarbon generation and storage mechanisms of deep-water shelf shales of Ordovician Wufeng Formation-Silurian Longmaxi Formation in Sichuan Basin,China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2020,47(1):193-201.
[5] 付金华,李士祥,徐黎明,等.鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组长7段古沉积环境恢复及意义[J].石油勘探与开发,2018,45(6):936-946.
FU Jinhua,LI Shixiang,XU Liming,et al.Paleo-sedimentary environmental restoration and its significance of Member 7 of Triassic Yanchang Formation in Ordos Basin,NW China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2018,45(6):936-946.
[6] 支东明,唐勇,杨智峰,等.准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷陆相页岩油地质特征与聚集机理[J].石油与天然气地质,2019,40(3):524-534.
ZHI Dongming,TANG Yong,YANG Zhifeng,et al.Geological characteristics and accumulation mechanism of continental shale oil in Jimusaer sag,Junggar Basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2019,40(3):524-534.
[7] 葸克来,操应长,朱如凯,等.吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组致密油储层岩石类型及特征[J].石油学报,2015,36(12):1495-1507.
XI Kelai,CAO Yingchang,ZHU Rukai,et al.Rock types and characteristics of tight oil reservoir in Permian Lucaogou Formation,Jimsar sag[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2015,36(12):1495-1507.
[8] 赵贤正,周立宏,蒲秀刚,等.断陷湖盆湖相页岩油形成有利条件及富集特征——以渤海湾盆地沧东凹陷孔店组二段为例[J].石油学报,2019,40(9):1013-1029.
ZHAO Xianzheng,ZHOU Lihong,PU Xiugang,et al.Favorable formation conditions and enrichment characteristics of lacustrine facies shale oil in faulted lake basin:a case study of Member 2 of Kongdian Formation in Cangdong sag,Bohai Bay Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2019,40(9):1013-1029.
[9] 蒲秀刚,金凤鸣,韩文中,等.陆相页岩油甜点地质特征与勘探关键技术——以沧东凹陷孔店组二段为例[J].石油学报,2019,40(8):997-1012.
PU Xiugang,JIN Fengming,HAN Wenzhong,et al.Sweet spots geological characteristics and key exploration technologies of continental shale oil:a case study of Member 2 of Kongdian Formation in Cangdong sag[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2019,40(8):997-1012.
[10] 宋明水,刘惠民,王勇,等.济阳坳陷古近系页岩油富集规律认识与勘探实践[J].石油勘探与开发,2020,47(2):225-235.
SONG Mingshui,LIU Huimin,WANG Yong,et al.Enrichment rules and exploration practices of Paleogene shale oil in Jiyang depression,Bohai Bay Basin,China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2020,47(2):225-235.
[11] 姜振学,李廷微,宫厚健,等.沾化凹陷低熟页岩储层特征及其对页岩油可动性的影响[J].石油学报,2020,41(12):1587-1600.
JIANG Zhenxue,LI Tingwei,GONG Houjian,et al.Characteristics of low-mature shale reservoirs in Zhanhua sag and their influence on the mobility of shale oil[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2020,41(12):1587-1600.
[12] 李超,朱筱敏,朱世发,等.沾化凹陷罗家地区沙三下段泥页岩储层特征[J].沉积学报,2015,33(4):795-808.
LI Chao,ZHU Xiaomin,ZHU Shifa,et al.Shale reservoir characteristics of the lower submember of Member 3 of Shahejie Formation,Luojia area,Zhanhua sag[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2015,33(4):795-808.
[13] 姜在兴.风场-物源-盆地系统沉积动力学-沉积体系成因解释与分布预测新概念[M].北京:科学出版社,2016.
JIANG Zaixing.Sedimentary dynamics of windfield-source-basin system:new concept for interpretation and prediction[M].Beijing:Science Press,2016.
[14] 朱筱敏.沉积岩石学[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2008.
ZHU Xiaomin.Sedimentary petrology[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2008.
[15] SCHIEBER J,SOUTHARD J B,SCHIMMELMANN A.Lenticular shale fabrics resulting from intermittent erosion of water-rich muds -interpreting the rock record in the light of recent flume experiments[J].Journal of Sedimentary Research,2010,80(1):119-128.
[16] ZOLITSCHKA B,FRANCUS P,OJALA A E K,et al.Varves in lake sediments-a review[J].Quaternary Science Reviews,2015,117:1-41.
[17] ZHANG Jianguo,JIANG Zaixing,JIANG Xiaolong,et al.Oil generation induces sparry calcite formation in lacustrine mudrock,Eocene of east China[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,2016,71:344-359.
[18] WANG Miao,CHEN Yong,SONG Guoqi,et al.Formation of bedding-parallel,fibrous calcite veins in laminated source rocks of the Eocene Dongying depression:a growth model based on petrographic observations[J].International Journal of Coal Geology,2018,200:18-35.
[19] SCHIMMELMANN A,LANGE C B,SCHIEBER J,et al.Varves in marine sediments:a review[J].Earth-Science Reviews,2016,159:215-246.
[20] ZHAO Ke,DU Xuebin,LU Yongchao,et al.Are light-dark coupled laminae in lacustrine shale seasonally controlled? a case study using astronomical tuning from 42.2 to 45.4 Ma in the Dongying depression,Bohai Bay Basin,eastern China[J].Palaeogeography,Palaeoclimatology,Palaeoecology,2019,528:35-49.
[21] ZHANG Jianguo,JIANG Zaixing,LIANG Chao,et al.Lacustrine massive mudrock in the Eocene Jiyang depression,Bohai Bay Basin,China:Nature,origin and significance[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,2016,77:1042-1055.
[22] TRIPSANAS E K,BRYANT W R,PHANEUF B A.Depositional processes of uniform mud deposits (unifites),Hedberg Basin,northwest Gulf of Mexico:new perspectives[J].AAPG Bulletin,2004,88(6):825-840.
[23] 王冠民.古气候变化对湖相高频旋回泥岩和页岩的沉积控制-以济阳坳陷古近系为例[D].广州:中国科学院广州地球化学研究所,2005.
WANG Guanmin.The sedimentary control to mudstone and shale of high-frequency cycle by paleoclimate change:taking the Eocene in Jiyang depression as an example[D].Guangzhou:Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry,the Chinese Academy of Sciences,2005.
[24] 雷华蕊,姜在兴,周红科.早古近纪极热时期古气候演化分析:以东营凹陷为例[J].地学前缘,2018,25(4):176-184.
LEI Huarui,JIANG Zaixing,ZHOU Hongke.Analysis of paleoclimate evolution of the hyperthermal period in the early Paleogene:taking the Dongying depression as an example[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2018,25(4):176-184.
[25] 李守军,王明镇,郑德顺,等.山东济阳坳陷古近纪的气候恢复[J].山东科技大学学报:自然科学版,2003,22(3):6-9.
LI Shoujun,WANG Mingzhen,ZHENG Deshun,et al.Recovery of climate of Palaeogene in Jiyang depression of Shandong[J].Journal of Shandong University of Science and Technology:Natural Science,2003,22(3):6-9.
[26] PEARSON P N,PALMER M R.Atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations over the past 60 million years[J].Nature,2000,406(6797):695-699.
[27] ZACHOS J,PAGANI M,SLOAN L,et al.Trends,rhythms,and aberrations in global climate 65 Ma to present[J].Science,2001,292(5517):686-693.
[28] BEERLING D J,ROYER D L.Convergent Cenozoic CO₂ history[J].Nature Geoscience,2011,4(7):418-420.
[29] JAGNIECKI E A,LOWENSTEIN T K,JENKINS D M,et al.Eocene atmospheric CO₂ from the nahcolite proxy[J].Geology,2015,43(12):1075-1078.
[30] BLANPIED C,STANLEY D J.Uniform mud (Unifite) deposition in the Hellenic Trench,eastern Mediterranean[J].Smithsonian Contributions to the Marine Sciences,1981,13:1-40.
[31] BEHRENS E W.Unifite muds in intraslope basins,northwest Gulf of Mexico[J].Geo-marine Letters,1984,4(3):227-233.
[32] 田景春,张翔.沉积地球化学[M].北京:地质出版社,2016.
TIAN Jingchun,ZHANG Xiang.Sedimentary geochemistry[M].Beijing:Geology Press,2016.
[33] 吕炳全,孙国志.海洋环境与地质[M].上海:同济大学出版社,1997.
LV Bingquan,SUN Guozhi.Marine environment and geology[M].Shanghai:Tongji University Press,1997.
[34] 韦恒叶.古海洋生产力与氧化还原指标——元素地球化学综述[J].沉积与特提斯地质,2012,32(2):76-88.
WEI Henye.Productivity and redox proxies of palaeo-oceans:an overview of elementary geochemistry[J].Sedimentary Geology and Tethyan Geology,2012,32(2):76-88.
[35] 何承全,宋之琛,祝幼华.中国沟鞭藻类化石[M].北京:科学出版社,2010.
HE Chengquan,SONG Zhichen,ZHU Youhua.Dinoflagellates in China[M].Beijing:Science Press,2010.
[36] 胡素云,赵文智,侯连华,等.中国陆相页岩油发展潜力与技术对策[J].石油勘探与开发,2020,47(4):819-828.
HU Suyun,ZHAO Wenzhi,HOU Lianhua,et al.Development potential and technical strategy of continental shale oil in China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2020,47(4):819-828.
[37] 杜金虎,胡素云,庞正炼,等.中国陆相页岩油类型、潜力及前景[J].中国石油勘探,2019,24(5):560-568.
DU Jinhu,HU Suyun,PANG Zhenglian,et al.The types,potentials and prospects of continental shale oil in China[J].China Petroleum Exploration,2019,24(5):560-568.
[38] 何治亮,聂海宽,胡东风,等.深层页岩气有效开发中的地质问题——以四川盆地及其周缘五峰组-龙马溪组为例[J].石油学报,2020,41(4):379-391.
HE Zhiliang,NIE Haikuan,HU Dongfeng,et al.Geological problems in the effective development of deep shale gas:a case study of Upper Ordovician Wufeng-Lower Silurian Longmaxi formations in Sichuan Basin and its periphery[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2020,41(4):379-391.

渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷沙河街组三段下亚段细粒沉积岩岩相特征与沉积演化

Lithofacies and depositional evolution of fine-grained sedimentary rocks in the lower submember of the Member 3 of Shahejie Formation in Zhanhua sag, Bohai Bay Basin

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	何文渊, 崔宝文, 张金友, 赵莹, 程心阳, 刘召, 刘鑫, 曾花森. 松辽盆地北部嫩江组中—低成熟页岩油地质特征及勘探突破[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(6): 900-913.
[2]	刘胜男, 朱如凯, 靳军, 张婧雅. 油气运移约束陆相页岩油富集——以准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组为例[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(6): 932-946.
[3]	解德录, 赵贤正, 金凤鸣, 蒲秀刚, 韩文中, 时战楠, 张伟, 董雄英. 沧东凹陷深湖亚相纹层状页岩成因及页岩油可动性影响因素[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(5): 804-816.
[4]	熊钰, 郭美娟, 王羚鸿, 吴道铭, 陈美华, 李明秋, 邓波, 张芮, 路俊刚, 曾德铭. 四川盆地侏罗系大安寨段页岩油特征及可动性评价[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(5): 817-843.
[5]	侯连华, 米敬奎, 罗霞, 于志超, 林森虎, 廖凤荣, 庞正炼, 赵忠英. 压力对页岩原位加热产出油气特征的影响——以鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组7段3亚段页岩为例[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(4): 629-641.
[6]	杨勇, 张世明, 吕琦, 杜玉山, 李伟忠, 程紫燕, 吕晶, 刘祖鹏. 中国东部陆相断陷盆地中—低成熟度页岩油立体开发技术——以济阳坳陷古近系沙河街组为例[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(4): 672-682,697.
[7]	何永宏, 李桢, 樊建明, 张超, 张旭泽, 马兵. 鄂尔多斯盆地页岩油开发井网优化技术及实践——以庆城油田为例[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(4): 683-697.
[8]	武晓光, 龙腾达, 黄中伟, 高文龙, 李根生, 谢紫霄, 杨芮, 鲁京松, 马金亮. 页岩油多岩性交互储层径向井穿层压裂裂缝扩展特征[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(3): 559-573,585.
[9]	宋兆杰, 邓森, 宋宜磊, 刘勇, 鲜成钢, 张江, 韩啸, 曹胜, 付兰清, 崔焕琦. 大庆油田古龙页岩油-CO₂高压相态及传质规律[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(2): 390-402.
[10]	吴宝成, 吴承美, 谭强, 褚艳杰, 梁成钢, 李文波, 张金风, 陈依伟, 徐田录, 王良哲. 准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷昌吉页岩油成藏条件及勘探开发关键技术[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(2): 437-460.
[11]	李志军, 肖阳, 田建章, 李晓燕, 王元杰, 王海燕, 焦亚先, 汤小琪, 贾颖超, 任春玲, 严梦颖, 王成云, 任艺. 渤海湾盆地冀中坳陷新领域、新类型油气勘探潜力及有利方向[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(1): 69-98.
[12]	支东明, 李建忠, 周志超, 焦立新, 范谭广, 李斌, 梁辉, 王兴刚. 三塘湖盆地油气勘探开发新领域、新类型及资源潜力[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(1): 115-132.
[13]	朱相羽, 段宏亮, 孙雅雄. 苏北盆地高邮凹陷古近系陆相页岩油勘探突破及意义[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(8): 1206-1221,1257.
[14]	陶士振, 胡素云, 王建, 白斌, 庞正炼, 王民, 陈燕燕, 陈悦, 杨怡青, 金旭, 贾进华, 张天舒, 林森虎, 孟元林, 刘鸿儒, 王岚, 吴因业. 中国陆相致密油形成条件、富集规律与资源潜力[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(8): 1222-1239.
[15]	王然, 吴涛, 尤新才, 朱涛, 钱永新, 刘振宇, 万敏. 玛湖凹陷二叠系风城组页岩油储层岩相特征及定量评价[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(7): 1085-1096.