富有机质页岩中不同矿物的解吸规律

doi:10.7623/syxb202207009

石油学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (7): 989-997.DOI: 10.7623/syxb202207009

富有机质页岩中不同矿物的解吸规律

熊健¹, 林海宇¹, 李原杰², 闫森¹, 刘向君¹, 何海铭¹, 郑爽¹, 胡谍¹

1. 西南石油大学油气藏地质及开发工程国家重点实验室四川成都 610500;
2. 中国石油塔里木油田公司新疆库尔勒 841000

收稿日期:2021-03-17 修回日期:2021-09-19 出版日期:2022-07-25 发布日期:2022-08-01
通讯作者: 刘向君,女,1969年6月生,1995年获西南石油学院油气田开发工程专业博士学位,现为西南石油大学教授,主要从事岩石物理、工程测井等方面的教学与管理工作。Email:liuxiangjunswpi@163.com
作者简介:熊健,男,1986年12月生,2015年获西南石油大学油气田开发工程专业博士学位,现为西南石油大学副研究员,主要从事非常规岩石物理等方面的研究。Email:361184163@qq.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目"页岩纳米级孔隙中甲烷解吸的微观机理研究"（No.41602155）、西南石油大学青年科技创新团队项目（2018CXTD13）和西南石油大学第二十期大学生开放性实验重点项目"页岩气层岩石中不同矿物的解吸规律研究"（2020KSZ02019）资助。

The desorption laws of different minerals in the organic-rich shale

Xiong Jian¹, Lin Haiyu¹, Li Yuanjie², Yan Sen¹, Liu Xiangjun¹, He Haiming¹, Zheng Shuang¹, Hu Die¹

1. State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Southwest Petroleum University, Sichuan Chengdu 610500, China;
2. PetroChina Tarim Oilfield Company, Xinjiang Korla 841000, China

Received:2021-03-17 Revised:2021-09-19 Online:2022-07-25 Published:2022-08-01

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 四川盆地龙马溪组页岩气开发已由地质勘探转变为开发建产阶段，研究页岩中甲烷的解吸规律对于把握页岩气产出规律、正确评价页岩气可采储量有着重要意义。为了研究页岩中不同矿物的解吸特征及其对页岩气解吸的贡献，对龙马溪组页岩、蒙脱石、高岭石、伊利石、绿泥石、Ⅱ型干酪根及石英样品开展了60℃下高压甲烷等温吸附/解吸实验。在此基础上，定量分析了页岩、黏土矿物、石英及Ⅱ型干酪根的解吸迟滞现象，并计算了黏土矿物、Ⅱ型干酪根及石英中甲烷解吸效率曲线，研究了不同矿物之间解吸规律的差异性。研究结果表明，甲烷在干酪根、黏土矿物样品中的解吸过程表现出明显的解吸滞后现象，且不同黏土矿物样品的解吸滞后程度存在较明显的差异；干酪根的解吸迟滞系数最大，达到43.67%，不同类型黏土矿物的解吸迟滞系数不同，其大小顺序为蒙脱石>高岭石>绿泥石>伊利石；随着压力降低，页岩岩样、黏土矿物、干酪根和石英的解吸效率都呈增大的趋势，且干酪根、黏土矿物、页岩的甲烷解吸效率曲线都呈现出明显的阶段性。

关键词: 页岩气, 黏土矿物, 干酪根, 解吸迟滞, 解吸效率

Abstract: In China, the research stage of the Longmaxi Formation shale gas reservoirs has changed from geological exploration to development and production. These is a great significance to research the law of desorption of methane in shale for grasping the law of shale gas production and correctly evaluating the recoverable reserves of shale gas. In order to research the desorption characteristics of different minerals in shale and their contribution to shale gas desorption. High pressure methane isotherm adsorption/desorption experiments at 60℃ were carried out on samples of shale, montmorillonite, kaolinite, illite, chlorite, type Ⅱkerogen and quartz. On this basis, the desorption hysteresis of shale, clay minerals, quartz and type Ⅱ kerogen was quantitatively analyzed, and the methane desorption efficiency curve in clay minerals, type Ⅱ kerogen and quartz was calculated, and the difference in desorption law between different minerals was studied. The results show that the desorption process of methane in kerogen, shale and clay mineral samples shows obvious desorption hysteresis, and the degree of desorption hysteresis of different types of samples are different. Kerogen has the largest desorption hysteresis coefficient, reaching 43.67%. The desorption hysteresis coefficients of different types of clay minerals are different, and the order of magnitude is montmorillonite>kaolinite> chlorite>illite. As the pressure decreases, the desorption efficiency of shale rock samples, clay minerals, kerogen and quartz all show an increasing trend, and the methane desorption efficiency curves of kerogen, clay minerals, and shale all show obvious stage characteristics.

Key words: shale gas, clay mineral, kerogen, desorption hysteresis, desorption efficiency

中图分类号:

TE135

熊健, 林海宇, 李原杰, 闫森, 刘向君, 何海铭, 郑爽, 胡谍. 富有机质页岩中不同矿物的解吸规律[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(7): 989-997.

Xiong Jian, Lin Haiyu, Li Yuanjie, Yan Sen, Liu Xiangjun, He Haiming, Zheng Shuang, Hu Die. The desorption laws of different minerals in the organic-rich shale[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2022, 43(7): 989-997.

参考文献

[1] 邹才能, 潘松圻, 荆振华, 等.页岩油气革命及影响[J].石油学报, 2020, 41(1):1-12.
ZOU Caineng, PAN Songqi, JING Zhenhua, et al.Shale oil and gas revolution and its impact[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(1):1-12.
[2] 马新华, 谢军, 雍锐, 等.四川盆地南部龙马溪组页岩气储集层地质特征及高产控制因素[J].石油勘探与开发, 2020, 47(5):841-855.
MA Xinhua, XIE Jun, YONG Rui, et al.Geological characteristics and high production control factors of shale gas reservoirs in Silurian Longmaxi Formation, southern Sichuan Basin, SW China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(5):841-855.
[3] CURTIS J B.Fractured shale-gas systems[J].AAPG Bulletin, 2002, 86(11):1921-1938.
[4] 高和群, 曹海虹, 曾隽.页岩气解吸规律新认识[J].油气地质与采收率, 2019, 26(2):81-86.
GAO Hequn, CAO Haihong, ZENG Jun.New understanding of shale gas desorption law[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2019, 26(2):81-86.
[5] ZHOU Qin, XIAO Xianming, TIAN Hui, et al.Modeling free gas content of the Lower Paleozoic shales in the Weiyuan area of the Sichuan Basin, China[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2014, 56:87-96.
[6] GASPARIK M, BERTIER P, GENSTERBLUM Y, et al.Geological controls on the methane storage capacity in organic-rich shales[J].International Journal of Coal Geology, 2014, 123:34-51.
[7] 何晶, 何生, 刘早学, 等.鄂西黄陵背斜南翼下寒武统水井沱组页岩孔隙结构与吸附能力[J].石油学报, 2020, 41(1):27-42.
HE Jing, HE Sheng, LIU Zaoxue, et al.Pore structure and adsorption capacity of shale in the Lower Cambrian Shuijingtuo Formation in the southern flank of Huangling anticline, western Hubei[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(1):27-42.
[8] JI Liming, ZHANG Tongwei, MILLIKEN K L, et al.Experimental investigation of main controls to methane adsorption in clay-rich rocks[J].Applied Geochemistry, 2012, 27(12):2533-2545.
[9] LIU Dong, YUAN Peng, LIU Hongmei, et al.High-pressure adsorption of methane on montmorillonite, kaolinite and illite[J].Applied Clay Science, 2013, 85:25-30.
[10] XIONG Jian, LIU Xiangjun, LIANG Lixi, et al.Adsorption of methane in organic-rich shale nanopores:an experimental and molecular simulation study[J].Fuel, 2017, 200:299-315.
[11] 张遂安, 叶建平, 唐书恒, 等.煤对甲烷气体吸附-解吸机理的可逆性实验研究[J].天然气工业, 2005, 25(1):44-46.
ZHANG Suian, YE Jianping, TANG Shuheng, et al.Theoretical analysis of coal-methane adsorption/desorption mechanism and its reversibility experimental study[J].Natural Gas Industry, 2005, 25(1):44-46.
[12] ZHU Hongxia, SELIM H M.Hysteretic behavior of metolachlor adsorption-desorption in soils[J].Soil Science, 2000, 165(8):632-645.
[13] WANG Kai, WANG Gongda, REN Ting, et al.Methane and CO₂ sorption hysteresis on coal:a critical review[J].International Journal of Coal Geology, 2014, 132:60-80.
[14] WANG Gongda, REN Ting, WANG Kai, et al.Influence of maximum pressure on the path of CO₂ desorption isotherm on coal[J].Energy & Fuels, 2014, 28(11):7093-7096.
[15] 郭为, 熊伟, 高树生, 等.页岩气等温吸附/解吸特征[J].中南大学学报:自然科学版, 2013, 44(7):2836-2840.
GUO Wei, XIONG Wei, GAO Shusheng, et al.Isothermal adsorption/desorption characteristics of shale gas[J].Journal of Central South University:Science and Technology, 2013, 44(7):2836-2840.
[16] 关富佳, 张杰, 王海涛, 等.川东龙马溪组页岩解吸滞后现象实验研究[J].西安石油大学学报:自然科学版, 2017, 32(1):71-74.
GUAN Fujia, ZHANG Jie, WANG Haitao, et al.Experimental study on desorption hysteresis of Longmaxi Formation shale in eastern Sichuan[J].Journal of Xi'an Shiyou University:Natural Science Edition, 2017, 32(1):71-74.
[17] 岳长涛, 李术元, 李林玥, 等.页岩气等温解吸特性研究[J].现代地质, 2017, 31(1):150-157.
YUE Changtao, LI Shuyuan, LI Linyue, et al.Study on desorption properties of shale gas[J].Geoscience, 2017, 31(1):150-157.
[18] 赵玉集, 郭为, 熊伟, 等.页岩等温吸附/解吸影响因素研究[J].天然气地球科学, 2014, 25(6):940-946.
ZHAO Yuji, GUO Wei, XIONG Wei, et al.Study of impact factors on shale gas adsorption and desorption[J].Natural Gas Geoscience, 2014, 25(6):940-946.
[19] KONG Shaoqi, HUANG Xing, LI Kunjie, et al.Adsorption/desorption isotherms of CH₄ and C₂H₆ on typical shale samples[J].Fuel, 2019, 255:115632.
[20] 熊健.页岩对甲烷吸附性能影响因素研究[D].成都:西南石油大学, 2015.
XIONG Jian.Investigation of the influences of the methane adsorption capacity on the shales[D].Chengdu:Southwest Petroleum University, 2015.
[21] 国家能源局.沉积岩中黏土矿物和常见非黏土矿物X射线衍射分析方法:SY/T 5163-2018[S].北京:石油工业出版社, 2018.
National Energy Administration.Analysis method for clay minerals and ordinary non-clay minerals in sedimentary rocks by the X-ray diffraction:SY/T 5163-2018[S].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 2018.
[22] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局.沉积岩中总有机碳的测定:GB/T 19145-2003[S].北京:中国标准出版社, 2003.
General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China.Determination of total organic carbon in sedimentary rock:GB/T 19145-2003[S].Beijing:Standards Press of China, 2003.
[23] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会.沉积岩中干酪根分离方法:GB/T 19144-2010[S].北京:中国标准出版社, 2010.
General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China, Standardization Administration.Isolation method for kerogen from sedimentary rock:GB/T 19144-2010[S].Beijing:Standards Press of China, 2010.
[24] ROUQUEROL J, AVNIR D, FAIRBRIDGE C W, et al.Recommendations for the characterization of porous solids (technical report)[J].Pure and Applied Chemistry, 1994, 66(8):1739-1758.
[25] 周尚文, 薛华庆, 郭伟, 等.基于重量法的页岩气超临界吸附特征实验研究[J].煤炭学报, 2016, 41(11):2806-2812.
ZHOU Shangwen, XUE Huaqing, GUO Wei, et al.Supercritical isothermal adsorption characteristics of shale gas based on gravimetric method[J].Journal of China Coal Society, 2016, 41(11):2806-2812.
[26] SING K S W, EVERETT D H, HAUL R A W, et al.Reporting physisorption data for gas/solid systems with special reference to the determination of surface area and porosity (recommendations 1984)[J].Pure and Applied Chemistry, 1985, 57(4):603-619
[27] 王公达, REN Tingxiang, 齐庆新, 等.吸附解吸迟滞现象机理及其对深部煤层气开发的影响[J].煤炭学报, 2016, 41(1):49-56.
WANG Gongda, REN Tingxiang, QI Qingxin, et al.Mechanism of adsorption-desorption hysteresis and its influence on deep CBM recovery[J].Journal of China Coal Society, 2016, 41(1):49-56.
[28] 马东民, 马薇, 蔺亚兵.煤层气解吸滞后特征分析[J].煤炭学报, 2012, 37(11):1885-1889.
MA Dongmin, MA Wei, LIN Yabing.Desorption hysteresis characteristics of CBM[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2012, 37(11):1885-1889.
[29] LANGMUIR I.The adsorption of gases on plane surfaces of glass, mica and platinum[J].Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1918, 40(9):1361-1403.
[30] 马东民, 张遂安, 蔺亚兵.煤的等温吸附-解吸实验及其精确拟合[J].煤炭学报, 2011, 36(3):477-480.
MA Dongmin, ZHANG Suian, LIN Yabing.Isothermal adsorption and desorption experiment of coal and experimental results accuracy fitting[J].Journal of China Coal Society, 2011, 36(3):477-480.
[31] 任俊豪, 任晓海, 宋海强, 等.基于分子模拟的纳米孔内甲烷吸附与扩散特征[J].石油学报, 2020, 41(11):1366-1375.
REN Junhao, REN Xiaohai, SONG Haiqiang, et al.Adsorption and diffusion characteristics of methane in nanopores based on molecular simulation[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(11):1366-1375.

富有机质页岩中不同矿物的解吸规律

The desorption laws of different minerals in the organic-rich shale

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	梁兴, 单长安, 张磊, 罗瑀峰, 蒋立伟, 张介辉, 朱斗星, 舒红林, 李健. 四川盆地渝西地区大安深层页岩气田的勘探发现及成藏条件[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(3): 477-499.
[2]	李乐, 胡远清, 彭小桂, 王伟, 余浩宇, 崔亚圣. 页岩气藏中硫化氢成因研究进展[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(2): 461-476.
[3]	宋永, 唐勇, 何文军, 龚德瑜, 晏奇, 陈棡, 单祥, 刘超威, 刘刚, 秦志军, 阿布力米提·依明, 尤新才, 任海姣, 白雨, 高岗. 准噶尔盆地油气勘探新领域、新类型及勘探潜力[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(1): 52-68.
[4]	谭茂金, 武宏亮, 王思宇, 杜广慧, 白洋, 王谦. 中国海相页岩气测井评价技术进展与发展方向[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(1): 241-260.
[5]	王立歆, 李弘, 刘小民, 胡华锋. 中国海相页岩气地震勘探技术及其发展方向[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(1): 261-275.
[6]	赵金洲, 雍锐, 胡东风, 佘朝毅, 付永强, 吴建发, 蒋廷学, 任岚, 周博, 林然. 中国深层—超深层页岩气压裂:问题、挑战与发展方向[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(1): 295-311.
[7]	武瑾, 李海, 杨学锋, 赵圣贤, 郭伟, 孙玉平, 刘永, 刘兆龙. 深层海相页岩纹层类型、组合及其对储层品质的影响——以四川盆地南部泸州区块龙马溪组一段一亚段为例[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(9): 1517-1531.
[8]	熊亮, 赵勇, 魏力民, 庞河清, 慈建发. 威荣海相页岩气田页岩气富集机理及勘探开发关键技术[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(8): 1365-1381.
[9]	胡德高, 周林, 包汉勇, 刘皓天, 刘超, 孟志勇, 赵帅, 王建. 川东红星地区HY1井二叠系页岩气勘探突破及意义[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(2): 241-252.
[10]	王建, 郭秋麟, 赵晨蕾, 王玉满, 于京都, 柳庄小雪, 陈宁生. 中国主要盆地页岩油气资源潜力及发展前景[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(12): 2033-2044.
[11]	姜鹏飞, 吴建发, 朱逸青, 张德宽, 吴伟, 张芮, 吴喆, 王青, 杨雨然, 杨雪, 伍秋姿, 陈丽清, 何一凡, 张娟. 四川盆地海相页岩气富集条件及勘探开发有利区[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(1): 91-109.
[12]	张智, 王嘉伟, 吴优, 霍宏博, 谢涛, 李金蔓. 页岩气水平井固井水泥环状态对套管力学完整性的影响[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(8): 1158-1172.
[13]	端祥刚, 吴建发, 张晓伟, 胡志明, 常进, 周尚文, 陈学科, 祁灵. 四川盆地海相页岩气提高采收率研究进展与关键问题[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(8): 1185-1200.
[14]	郭旭升, 腾格尔, 魏祥峰, 俞凌杰, 陆现彩, 孙磊, 魏富彬. 四川盆地深层海相页岩气赋存机理与勘探潜力[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(4): 453-468.
[15]	孙建孟, 宿鹤松, 郭宁, 王德强, 曾鑫, 袁卫国, 冯明刚, 严伟, 周贤斌. 生物成因硅确定方法及其在页岩气储层可压裂性评价中的应用[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(4): 548-557.