四川盆地卧龙河构造茅口组岩溶储层地震预测

doi:10.7623/syxb202106003

石油学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (6): 724-735.DOI: 10.7623/syxb202106003

四川盆地卧龙河构造茅口组岩溶储层地震预测

熊晓军¹, 陈容¹, 袁野¹, 张鑫¹, 冯亮², 吴永宏², 徐发波²

1. 油气藏地质及开发工程国家重点实验室(成都理工大学) 四川成都 610059;
2. 中国石油西南油气田公司重庆气矿重庆 400021

收稿日期:2020-02-04 修回日期:2020-07-22 出版日期:2021-06-25 发布日期:2021-07-06
通讯作者: 陈容,女,1995年5月生,2018年获成都理工大学学士学位,现为成都理工大学硕士研究生,主要从事油气地球物理新方法研究。Email:2634825567@qq.com
作者简介:熊晓军,男,1980年12月生,2002年获西南石油大学学士学位,2007年获成都理工大学博士学位,现为成都理工大学教授、博士生导师,主要从事岩石物理分析及油气地震勘探新方法研究工作。Email:xiongxiaojun07@cdut.cn
基金资助:
国家科技重大专项（2016ZX05023004-001-003）资助。

Seismic prediction of karst reservoirs of the Maokou Formation in Wolonghe structure of Sichuan Basin

Xiong Xiaojun¹, Chen Rong¹, Yuan Ye¹, Zhang Xin¹, Feng Liang², Wu Yonghong², Xu Fabo²

1. State Key Lab of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploritation, Chengdu University of Technology, Sichuan Chengdu 610059, China;
2. Chongqing Gas Field, PetroChina Southwest Oil & Gasfield Company, Chongqing 400021, China

Received:2020-02-04 Revised:2020-07-22 Online:2021-06-25 Published:2021-07-06

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在四川盆地川东高陡构造带，20世纪80—90年代沿用蜀南勘探模式发现了卧龙河构造区块茅口组天然气藏，累计产量达44.13×10⁸m³，占已探明储量的72.57 % ，但近年来却未再取得较大的勘探突破。通过分析储层发育的影响因素发现，卧龙河构造区块茅口组储层主要受后期岩溶及白云石化改造，其中，白云石化对储层起建设作用，岩溶缝洞体是该地区寻找茅口组气藏的关键，但常规的岩溶储层预测方法应用效果不佳，岩溶储层厚度平面分布的预测难度大。研究中提出岩溶储层地震预测技术的分析步骤包括：①从岩溶发育的地质基础入手，开展古地貌研究，圈定岩溶发育有利区域；②基于岩溶储层的地球物理响应特征，开发岩溶地震预测新技术，在岩溶发育有利区进一步圈定岩溶发育带；③根据岩溶储层的测井响应特征，采用岩溶储层发育带作为相控条件，并通过相控随机反演获得岩溶的纵波速度数据体；④综合古地貌、岩溶发育带和岩溶纵波速度体，定量表征岩溶储层的平面展布规律。研究结果表明，预测岩溶的时域厚度和岩溶储层厚度与实钻井的符合率达88 % ，有效地实现了卧龙河构造区块茅口组岩溶储层的地震预测，形成的地震岩溶储层预测技术有助于打开四川盆地下二叠统茅口组的勘探局面。

关键词: 岩溶, 茅口组, 地震预测, 古地貌, 卧龙河构造, 四川盆地

Abstract: In the high-steep structural belt of the eastern Sichuan Basin, gas reservoirs of the Maokou Formation in Wolonghe structure block were discovered between the 1980 s and 1990 s by following the exploration model in South Sichuan. The natural gas production reached 44.13×10⁸m³, accounting for 72.57% of the explored reserves. However, no major exploration breakthroughs have been made in recent years. By analyzing the influencing factors of reservoir development, it is determined that the Maokou Formation reservoir in Wolonghe structure block is mainly reformed by later karstification and dolomitization. Among them, dolomitization plays a role in construction of the reservoir, and the karst fracture-cavern body is the key to finding gas reservoirs of the Maokou Formation in the study area. But the application effect of conventional prediction methods for karst reservoir is not good, and it is difficult to predict the regional distribution of karst reservoir thickness. The seismic prediction technology put forward for karst reservoirs in this study include the following analytical steps. (1) According to the development condition of karst geology, paleogeomorphology research is carried out to delineate the favorable areas for karst reservoir development. (2) Based on the geophysical response characteristics of karst reservoirs, a new seismic prediction technique of karst is developed to further delineate the karst development zones in the favorable karst areas. (3) According to the logging response characteristics of karst reservoir, the development zone of karst reservoir is adopted as the facies control condition, and the P-wave velocity data volume of karst is obtained through the facies-controlled stochastic inversion. (4) The regional distribution regularity of karst reservoirs is quantitatively characterized by integrating paleogeomorphology, development zone and P-wave velocity body of karst. The research results show that the time domain thickness and reservoir thickness of the predicted karst coincide with those of the drilled wells up to 88%, which effectively realizes the seismic prediction of the karst reservoirs of the Maokou Formation in Wolonghe structure block. The seismic prediction technology of karst reservoirs helps to open up the prospects for exploration of the Lower Permian Maokou Formation in Sichuan Basin.

Key words: karst, Maokou Formation, seismic prediction, paleogeomorphology, Wolonghe structure, Sichuan Basin

中图分类号:

TE122.2

熊晓军, 陈容, 袁野, 张鑫, 冯亮, 吴永宏, 徐发波. 四川盆地卧龙河构造茅口组岩溶储层地震预测[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(6): 724-735.

Xiong Xiaojun, Chen Rong, Yuan Ye, Zhang Xin, Feng Liang, Wu Yonghong, Xu Fabo. Seismic prediction of karst reservoirs of the Maokou Formation in Wolonghe structure of Sichuan Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2021, 42(6): 724-735.

参考文献

[1] 陈宗清.四川盆地中二叠统茅口组天然气勘探[J].中国石油勘探,2007,12(5):1-11.
CHEN Zongqing.Exploration for natural gas in Middle Permian Maokou Formation of Sichuan Basin[J].China Petroleum Exploration,2007,12(5):1-11.
[2] 汪泽成,江青春,黄士鹏,等.四川盆地中二叠统茅口组天然气大面积成藏的地质条件[J].天然气工业,2018,38(1):30-38.
WANG Zecheng,JIANG Qingchun,HUANG Shipeng,et al.Geological conditions for massive accumulation of natural gas in the Mid-Permian Maokou Fm of the Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,2018,38(1):30-38.
[3] 胡安平,潘立银,郝毅,等.四川盆地二叠系栖霞组、茅口组白云岩储层特征、成因和分布[J].海相油气地质,2018,23(2):39-52.
HU Anping,PAN Liyin,HAO Yi,et al.Origin,characteristics and distribution of dolostone reservoir in Qixia Formation and Maokou Formation,Sichuan Basin,China[J].Marine Origin Petroleum Geology,2018,23(2):39-52.
[4] 张健,周刚,张光荣,等.四川盆地中二叠统天然气地质特征与勘探方向[J].天然气工业,2018,38(1):10-20.
ZHANG Jian,ZHOU Gang,ZHANG Guangrong,et al.Geological characteristics and exploration orientation of Mid-Permian natural gas in the Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,2018,38(1):10-20.
[5] 沈平,张健,宋家荣,等.四川盆地中二叠统天然气勘探新突破的意义及有利勘探方向[J].天然气工业,2015,35(7):1-9.
SHEN Ping,ZHANG Jian,SONG Jiarong,et al.Significance of new breakthrough in and favorable targets of gas exploration in the Middle Permian system,Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,2015,35(7):1-9.
[6] 胡安平,陈汉林,杨树峰,等.卧龙河气田天然气成因及成藏主要控制因素[J].石油学报,2008,29(5):643-649.
HU Anping,CHEN Hanlin,YANG Shufeng,et al.Origin of natural gas and main controlling factors of reservoirs in Wolonghe gas field[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2008,29(5):643-649.
[7] 杨光,汪华,沈浩,等.四川盆地中二叠统储层特征与勘探方向[J].天然气工业,2015,35(7):10-16.
YANG Guang,WANG Hua,SHEN Hao,et al.Characteristics and exploration prospects of Middle Permian reservoirs in the Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,2015,35(7):10-16.
[8] 陈宗清.卧龙河气田天然气富集因素解剖[J].石油学报,1990,11(4):1-7.
CHEN Zongqing.Factors affection the accumulation of natural gas in Wolonghe gas field[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,1990,11(4):1-7.
[9] 杨天泉,唐泽尧.卧龙河复杂气田的地质特征及勘探开发技术[J].天然气工业,1995,15(6):5-9.
YANG Tianquan,TANG Zeyao.Geological characteristics of Wolonghe complex gas filed and its exploration and development techniques[J].Natural Gas Industry,1995,15(6):5-9.
[10] 徐发波,易娟子.川东地区下二叠统白云岩分布特征及勘探目标评价研究[R].成都:中国石油西南油气田分公司,2016.
XU Fabo,YI Juanzi.Study on the distribution characteristics of Lower Permian dolomite and evaluation of exploration targets in eastern Sichuan Basin[R].Chengdu:PetroChina Southwest Oil & Gasfield Company,2016.
[11] 戴晓峰,张明,江青春,等.四川盆地中部下二叠统茅口组岩溶储集层地震预测[J].石油勘探与开发,2017,44(1):79-88.
DAI Xiaofeng,ZHANG Ming,JIANG Qingchun,et al.Karst reservoirs seismic prediction of Lower Permian Maokou Formation in central Sichuan Basin,SW China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2017,44(1):79-88.
[12] 徐姣,孙庆莉,段杰,等.四川盆地东部涪陵-巴南地区茅口组储层特征及预测[J].天然气勘探与开发,2019,42(3):86-94.
XU Jiao,SUN Qingli,DUAN Jie,et al.Predicting reservoir characteristics of Maokou Formation,Fuling-Ba'nan area,eastern Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Exploration and Development,2019,42(3):86-94.
[13] 程雪莹.川东地区中二叠统茅口组岩溶特征及发育模式[D].成都:西南石油大学,2017.
CHENG Xueyin.Karst Characteristics and development model of Maokou Formation of Middle Permian in eastern Sichuan Basin[D].Chengdu:Southwest Petroleum University,2017.
[14] 白光辉.开江地区茅口组岩溶古地貌恢复及储层预测研究[D].西安:西安石油大学,2019.
BAI Guanghui.Karst Palaeogeomorphology restoration and reservoir prediction of Maokou Formation in Kaijiang area[D].Xi'an:Xi'an Shiyou University,2019.
[15] 张超.四川盆地东部开江古隆起形成与演化[D].北京:中国石油大学,2016.
ZHANG Chao.The formation and evolution of Kaijiang paleo-uplift in eastern Sichuan Basin[D].Beijing:China University of Petroleum,2016.
[16] 朱茂,沈安江,曾洪流,等.古地貌恢复在岩溶风化壳储层研究中的应用——以川中磨溪地区灯影组四段为例[J].海相油气地质,2018,23(4):87-95.
ZHU Mao,SHEN Anjiang,ZENG Hongliu,et al.The application of paleogeomorphy restoration to the study of karst weathering crust reservoir:a case from the fourth member of Dengying Formation in Moxi area,Sichuan Basin[J].Marine Origin Petroleum Geology,2018,23(4):87-95.
[17] 厚刚福,徐洋,孙靖,等.三角洲前缘-湖盆深水区沉积模式及意义——以准噶尔盆地盆1井西凹陷三工河组二段一砂组为例[J].石油学报,2019,40(10):1223-1232.
HOU Gangfu,XU Yang,SUN Jing,et al.Sedimentary model from delta front to deep water area and its significance:a case study of the first sand group of Member 2 of Sangonghe Formation in the Well Pen-1 West sag,Junggar Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2019,40(10):1223-1232.
[18] 陈双全,季敏.地震数据结构张量相干计算方法[J].石油物探,2012,51(3):233-238.
CHEN Shuangquan,JI Min.Structure tensor coherence computation method of seismic data[J].Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum,2012,51(3):233-238.
[19] 王震,文欢,邓光校,等.塔河油田碳酸盐岩断溶体刻画技术研究与应用[J].石油物探,2019,58(1):149-154.
WANG Zhen,WEN Huan,DENG Guangxiao,et al.Fault-karst characterization technology in the Tahe oilfield,China[J].Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum,2019,58(1):149-154.
[20] 李映涛,漆立新,张哨楠,等.塔里木盆地顺北地区中-下奥陶统断溶体储层特征及发育模式[J].石油学报,2019,40(12):1470-1484.
LI Yingtao,QI Lixin,ZHANG Shaonan,et al.Characteristics and development mode of the Middle and Lower Ordovician fault-karst reservoir in Shunbei area,Tarim Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2019,40(12):1470-1484.
[21] ZHOU Yubang,LI Yong,WANG Mengxiu,et al.A study of GST method in the seismic attributes[C]//International Geophysical Conference.Beijing,China:SEG,2018:878-881.
[22] WU Xinming.Directional structure-tensor-based coherence to detect seismic faults and channels[J].Geophysics,2017,82(2):A13-A17.
[23] 逯宇佳,曹俊兴,刘哲哿,等.波形分类技术在缝洞型储层流体识别中的应用[J].石油学报,2019,40(2):182-189.
LU Yujia,CAO Junxing,LIU Zhege,et al.Application of waveform classification technology for fluid identification in fractured-vuggy reservoir[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2019,40(2):182-189.
[24] 苑书金.地震相干体技术的研究综述[J].勘探地球物理进展,2007,30(1):7-15.
YUAN Shujin.A review of seismic coherence techniques[J].Progress in Exploration Geophysics,2007,30(1):7-15.
[25] 李凡异,魏建新,狄帮让,等.碳酸盐岩孔洞储层地震物理模型研究[J].石油地球物理勘探,2016,51(2):272-280.
LI Fanyi,WEI Jianxin,DI Bangrang,et al.Seismic physical model of carbonate cavern reservoirs[J].Oil Geophysical Prospecting,2016,51(2):272-280.
[26] 王香文,刘红,滕彬彬,等.地质统计学反演技术在薄储层预测中的应用[J].石油与天然气地质,2012,33(5):730-735.
WANG Xiangwen,LIU Hong,TENG Binbin,et al.Application of geostatistical inversion to thin reservoir prediction[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2012,33(5):730-735.
[27] 徐立恒,宋宝权,韩嵩,等.变尺度构造模型在地质统计学反演储层预测中的应用[J].石油学报,2019,40(2):190-196.
XU Liheng,SONG Baoquan,HAN Song,et al.Application of variable-scale structure model on geo-statistics inversion reservoir prediction[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2019,40(2):190-196.
[28] 林康.地震数据相控随机反演方法研究[D].成都:电子科技大学,2018.
LIN Kang.Geostatistical stochastic inversion with seismic facies constraint[D].Chengdu:University of Electronic Science and Technology of China,2018.
[29] 黄捍东,罗群,付燕,等.地震相控非线性随机反演研究与应用[J].石油地球物理勘探,2007,42(6):694-698.
HUANG Handong,LUO Qun,FU Yan,et al.Study and application of seismic phase-controlled non-linear random inversion[J].Oil Geophysical Prospecting,2007,42(6):694-698.
[30] 周超宇.地质统计学地震反演技术在溱潼南华地区薄砂层的预测应用[J].非常规油气,2018,5(4):23-26.
ZHOU Chaoyu.Application of the geostatistical seismic inversion in thin sand in Nanhua area,Qintong sag[J].Unconventional Oil & Gas,2018,5(4):23-26.
[31] 刘立峰,孙赞东,杨海军,等.塔中地区碳酸盐岩储集相控建模技术及应用[J].石油学报,2010,31(6):952-958.
LIU Lifeng,SUN Zandong,YANG Haijun,et al.Modeling of facies-controlled carbonate reservoirs in the Tazhong area and its application[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2010,31(6):952-958.

四川盆地卧龙河构造茅口组岩溶储层地震预测

Seismic prediction of karst reservoirs of the Maokou Formation in Wolonghe structure of Sichuan Basin

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	鲁雪松, 柳少波, 田华, 马行陟, 于志超, 范俊佳, 桂丽黎, 刘强. 深层背斜圈闭中泥岩盖层完整性评价方法及其应用——以四川盆地川中地区震旦系气藏为例[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(4): 415-427.
[2]	王尉, 赵路子, 罗冰, 刘冉, 李亚, 赵立可, 裴森奇, 胡涛. 川西地区二叠系火山岩异常高压演化与天然气成藏的关系[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(11): 1437-1445.
[3]	夏钦禹, 闫海军, 徐伟, 张林, 罗文军, 邓惠, 俞霁晨. 川中地区磨溪区块震旦系顶面古岩溶微地貌及其发育特征[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(10): 1299-1309,1336.
[4]	宁超众, 孙龙德, 胡素云, 徐怀民, 潘文庆, 李勇, 赵宽志. 塔里木盆地哈拉哈塘油田奥陶系缝洞型碳酸盐岩储层岩溶类型及特征[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(1): 15-32.
[5]	闫海军, 彭先, 夏钦禹, 徐伟, 罗文军, 李新豫, 张林, 朱秋影, 朱迅, 刘曦翔. 高石梯—磨溪地区灯影组四段岩溶古地貌分布特征及其对气藏开发的指导意义[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(6): 658-670,752.
[6]	金强, 张三, 孙建芳, 魏荷花, 程付启, 张旭栋. 塔河油田奥陶系碳酸盐岩岩溶相形成和演化[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(5): 513-525.
[7]	谷一凡, 周路, 蒋裕强, 倪佳, 李俊良, 朱讯, 付永红, 蒋增政. 四川盆地高石梯区块震旦系灯影组四段储层类型及气井产能模式[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(5): 574-583.
[8]	何治亮, 聂海宽, 胡东风, 蒋廷学, 王濡岳, 张钰莹, 张光荣, 卢志远. 深层页岩气有效开发中的地质问题——以四川盆地及其周缘五峰组—龙马溪组为例[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(4): 379-391.
[9]	杨威, 魏国齐, 谢武仁, 马石玉, 金惠, 苏楠, 孙爱, 沈珏红, 郝翠果, 武赛军. 川中地区龙王庙组优质储层发育的主控因素及成因机制[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(4): 421-432.
[10]	高国辉, 曹剑, 罗冰, 肖笛, 张亚, 陈聪. 四川盆地西北部中二叠统海相混合型烃源岩的证据及对双鱼石大气藏的成藏贡献[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(4): 433-445.
[11]	许涛, 韦恒叶, 张璇, 耿梓傲, 汪建国. 中二叠统茅口组热液交代硅质岩成因——来自贵州桑树湾剖面角砾状硅质岩元素及硅同位素的证据[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(4): 446-456.
[12]	聂海宽, 李东晖, 姜涛, 颜彩娜, 杜伟, 张光荣. 基于笔石带特征的页岩等时地层测井划分方法及意义——以四川盆地及其周缘五峰组—龙马溪组为例[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(3): 273-283.
[13]	商晓飞, 段太忠, 张文彪, 程洪, 刘彦锋. 断控岩溶主控的缝洞型碳酸盐岩内部溶蚀相带表征——以塔河油田10区奥陶系油藏为例[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(3): 329-341.
[14]	郭建春, 陶亮, 陈迟, 李鸣, 赵志红. 川南地区龙马溪组页岩混合润湿性评价新方法[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(2): 216-225.
[15]	王玉满, 王红岩, 沈均均, 拜文华, 董大忠, 邱振, 李新景, 王灿辉. 川北—鄂西地区下志留统龙马溪组上段厚层斑脱岩的新发现及地质意义[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(11): 1309-1323.