基于正交天线的随钻方位电磁波电阻率成像响应特征模拟

doi:10.7623/syxb201809010

石油学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (9): 1063-1069.DOI: 10.7623/syxb201809010

基于正交天线的随钻方位电磁波电阻率成像响应特征模拟

杨震, 马清明, 杨宁宁, 崔海波, 李运升

中国石化胜利石油工程技术有限公司随钻测控技术中心山东东营 257064

收稿日期:2017-12-06 修回日期:2018-05-28 出版日期:2018-09-25 发布日期:2018-09-28
通讯作者: 杨震,男,1982年3月生,2004年获石油大学(华东)学士学位,2009年获中国石油大学(华东)博士学位,现为中国石化胜利石油工程有限公司随钻测控技术中心高级工程师,主要从事随钻电测井仪器方面的研究。Email:stingsyzh@126.com
作者简介:杨震,男,1982年3月生,2004年获石油大学(华东)学士学位,2009年获中国石油大学(华东)博士学位,现为中国石化胜利石油工程有限公司随钻测控技术中心高级工程师,主要从事随钻电测井仪器方面的研究。Email:stingsyzh@126.com
基金资助:
国家科技重大专项（2016ZX05022-006）和国家重点研发计划项目（2016YFC0302802）资助。

Imaging response characteristic simulation of azimuthal electromagnetic resistivity while drilling based on orthogonal antenna

Yang Zhen, Ma Qingming, Yang Ningning, Cui Haibo, Li Yunsheng

Technology Center of Measuring and Controlling While Drilling, Sinopec Shengli Oilfield Service Corporation, Shandong Dongying 257064, China

Received:2017-12-06 Revised:2018-05-28 Online:2018-09-25 Published:2018-09-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

随钻方位电磁波仪器由于具备地层方位分辨性及较大的边界探测深度在地质导向中应用广泛。在常规电磁波电阻率接收天线附近增加横向天线，组成一个正交接收天线，分别接收不同分量电磁场信号。将不同分量、不同线圈距电磁场信号进行归一化组合，利用数值模拟对不同地层模型以及井眼轨迹的成像特征和规律进行模拟分析。数值模拟结果表明，不同分量、不同线圈距的电磁场分量组合可以合成方位电磁波电阻率，方位电磁波电阻率探测深度主要由横向天线测量的定向电动势信号决定。方位电磁波电阻率成像受地层电阻率对比度、相对井斜角以及地层厚度影响，可以准确直观地反应出井眼与地层的相对位置关系以及地层电阻率各向异性。通过对基于正交天线的方位电磁波电阻率成像方法模拟，可以更好地解释横向电阻率变化并指导地质导向应用。

关键词: 正交天线, 方位电磁波, 成像, 井眼轨迹, 地质导向, 数值模拟

Abstract:

Azimuthal electromagnetic wave tool while drilling has been widely used in geosteering because of its formation azimuthal resolution ability and large boundary detection depth. Transverse antenna is added near the conventional electromagnetic receiving antennas to construct a new orthogonal antenna assembly used for receiving the electromagnetic signals of different components. The electromagnetic signals of different components and coil spacing are normalized; using numerical simulation, a simulated analysis is performed on the imaging characteristics and laws in different formation models and borehole trajectories. The numerical simulation results show that azimuthal electromagnetic resistivity can be synthesized by the electromagnetic component assemblages of different components and coil spacing, and its detection depth is mainly determined by oriented electromotive force signals of transverse antenna. The azimuthal electromagnetic resistivity imaging is influenced by formation resistivity contrast, relative hole deviation angle and horizon thickness, able to accurately and intuitively reflect the relative position relationship between well borehole and formation as well as formation resistivity anisotropy. The study of azimuthal resistivity imaging method based on orthogonal antenna can better interpret the transverse resistivity changes and guide geosteering application.

Key words: orthogonal antenna, azimuthal electromagnetic wave, imaging, well trajectory, geosteering, numerical simulation

中图分类号:

TE271

杨震, 马清明, 杨宁宁, 崔海波, 李运升. 基于正交天线的随钻方位电磁波电阻率成像响应特征模拟[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(9): 1063-1069.

Yang Zhen, Ma Qingming, Yang Ningning, Cui Haibo, Li Yunsheng. Imaging response characteristic simulation of azimuthal electromagnetic resistivity while drilling based on orthogonal antenna[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2018, 39(9): 1063-1069.

参考文献

[1] 谭宝海,唐晓明,魏周拓,等. 随钻偶极横波远探测优势频带及反射声场[J].石油学报,2016,37(9):1152-1158.
TAN Baohai,TANG Xiaoming,WEI Zhoutuo,et al.Dominant frequency band and reflected wave field of LWD dipole shear wave remote detection[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2016,37(9):1152-1158.
[2] 蔡军,张恒荣,曾少军,等.随钻电磁波电阻率测井联合反演方法及其应用[J],石油学报,2016,37(3):371-381.
CAI Jun,ZHANG Hengrong,ZENG Shaojun,et al.Joint inversion method of electromagnetic wave resistivity logging while drilling and its application[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2016,37(3):371-381.
[3] OMERAGIC D,LI Diming,CHOU L,et al.Deep directional electromagnetic measurements for optimal well placement[R].SPE 97045,2005.
[4] CHEMALI R E,CAIRNS P,WANG T,et al.Method for signal enhancement in azimuthal propagation resistivity while drilling:US,7375530B2[P].2008-05-20.
[5] KENNEDY W D,CORLEY B,PAINCHAUD S,et al.Geosteering using deep resistivity images from azimuthal and multiple propagation resistivity:SPWLA 50th Annual Logging Symposium[C].The Woodlands,Texas:Society of Petrophysicists and Well-Log Analysts,2009.
[6] ZHANG Zhiyi,GONGUET C,RAJAN V,et al.Directional LWD resistivity tools and their business impacts:SPWLA 49th Annual Logging Symposium[C].Austin,Texas:Society of Petrophysicists and Well Log Analysts,2008.
[7] LI Qiming,OMERAGIC D,CHOU L,et al.New directional electromagnetic tool for proactive geosteering and accurate formation evaluation while drilling:SPWLA 46th Annual Logging Symposium[C].New Orleans,Louisiana:Society of Petrophysicists and Well-Log Analysts,2005.
[8] BITTAR M S,KLEIN J D,BESTE R,et al.A new azimuthal deep-reading resistivity tool for geosteering and advanced formation evaluation[R].SPE 109971,2007.
[9] 杨震,杨锦舟,韩来聚.随钻方位电磁波电阻率成像模拟及应用[J].吉林大学学报:地球科学版,2013,43(6):2035-2043.
YANG Zhen,YANG Jinzhou,HAN Laiju.Numerical simulation and application of azimuthal propagation resistivity imaging while drilling[J].Journal of Jilin University:Earth Science Edition,2013,43(6):2035-2043.
[10] 杨震,杨锦舟,韩来聚,等.随钻方位电磁波界面探测性能分析[J].石油学报,2016,37(7):930-938.
YANG Zhen,YANG Jinzhou,HAN Laiju,et al.Interface detection performance analysis of azimuthal electromagnetic while drilling[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2016,37(7):930-938.
[11] 王昌学,周灿灿,储昭坦,等.电性各向异性地层频率域电磁响应模拟[J].地球物理学报,2006,49(6):1873-1883.
WANG Changxue,ZHOU Cancan,CHU Zhaotan,et al.Modeling of electromagnetic responses in frequency domain to electrical anisotropic formations[J].Chinese Journal of Geophysics,2006,49(6):1873-1883.
[12] 李潮流,胡法龙,侯雨庭,等.基于有限元的致密砂岩储层电阻率特性模拟[J].石油学报,2016,37(6):787-795.
LI Chaoliu,HU Falong,HOU Yuting,et al.Simulation of electrical resistivity characteristics of tight sands reservoir by FEM[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2016,37(6):787-795.
[13] ZHANG Zhiyi,YU Liming,Kriegsmauser B,et al.Simultaneous determination of relative angles and anisotropic resistivity using multicomponent induction logging data:SPWLA 42nd Annual Logging Symposium[C].Houston,Texas:Society of Petrophysicists and Well-Log Analysts,2001.
[14] 肖加奇,张庚骥.水平井和大斜度井中的感应测井响应计算[J].地球物理学报,1995,38(3):396-404.
XIAO Jiaqi,ZHANG Gengji.Computation of induction logging response in horizontal and highly-deviated wells[J].Acta Geophysica Sinica,1995,38(3):396-404.
[15] 肖加奇,张庚骥.用快速富里叶-汉克耳变换算法计算层状介质中偶极天线电磁场[J].石油大学学报:自然科学版,1995,19(5):25-29.
XIAO Jiaqi,ZHANG Gengji.Computation of electromagnetic field due to diploe antenna in stratified media with fast Fourier-Hankel transform (FFHT)algorithm[J].Journal of the University of Petroleum,China,1995,19(5):25-29.
[16] 高杰,陈木银,陈雅薇,等.定向井各向异性地层交流电测井响应模拟[J].勘探地球物理进展,2003,26(4):301-304.
GAO Jie,CHEN Muyin,CHEN Yawei,et al.Forward modeling of AC logging responses in directional wells of anisotropic formations[J].Progress in Exploration Geophysics,2003,26(4):301-304.
[17] 张辉,李桐林,董瑞霞,等.利用高斯求积和连分式展开计算电磁张量格林函数积分[J].地球物理学进展,2005,20(3):667-670.
ZHANG Hui,LI Tonglin,DONG Ruixia,et al.Computation of green's tensor integrals for electromagnetic problems using Gaussian quadrature and continued fraction[J].Progress in Geophysics,2005,20(3):667-670.
[18] WANG T,CHEMALI R,HART E,et al.Real-time formation imaging,dip,and azimuth while drilling from compensated deep directional resistivity:SPWLA 48th Annual Logging Symposium[C].Palais des Nations,Geneva:Society of Petrophysicists and Well-Log Analysts,2007.
[19] FANG Sheng,MERCHANT A,HART E,et al.Determination of structural dip and azimuth from LWD azimuthal propagation resistivity measurements in anisotropic formations[R].SPE 116123,2008.
[20] 杨震,文艺,肖红兵.随钻方位电磁波仪器探测电阻率各向异性新方法[J].石油钻探技术,2016,44(3):115-120.
YANG Zhen,WEN Yi,XIAO Hongbing.A new method of detecting while drilling resistivity anisotropy with azimuthal electromagnetic wave tools[J].Petroleum Drilling Techniques,2016,44(3):115-120.

基于正交天线的随钻方位电磁波电阻率成像响应特征模拟

Imaging response characteristic simulation of azimuthal electromagnetic resistivity while drilling based on orthogonal antenna

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	许林, 刘书杰, 许明标, 冯桓榰, 邢希金, 邓佳佳. 压差激活密封剂的微缺陷自适应修复行为及机理[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(5): 686-694.
[2]	邹玮, 余一欣, 刘金水, 蒋一鸣, 唐贤君, 陈石, 余浪. 东海盆地西湖凹陷中央反转构造带发育主控因素及宁波背斜形成过程[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(2): 176-185.
[3]	丁露阳, 杨宁宁, 杨全进, 唐海全, 杨震, 肖文生, 葛鹏, 袁晓琪, 于华伟. 地质导向中的旋转失真与随钻自然伽马成像动态测量算法[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(1): 95-104.
[4]	祝效华, 罗云旭, 刘伟吉, 高锐, 贾玉丹, 刘呈君. 等离子体电脉冲钻井破岩机理的电击穿实验与数值模拟方法[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(9): 1146-1162.
[5]	高建申, 宋阳, 刘彦萍, 朱凯然, 刘昕. 低电阻率地层基于凹陷电极对的油基泥浆电成像测井四参数计算方法[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(8): 960-968.
[6]	孟卓然. BHA轴向磁干扰对方位测量误差的影响——基于人工磁场模拟方法[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(8): 1011-1018.
[7]	李文婧, 姜源, 单保东, 禹晓珊, 王超. 盐穴储气库注采运行时温效应对腔体稳定性的影响[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(6): 762-776.
[8]	窦晓峰, 宁伏龙, 李彦龙, 刘昌岭, 孙嘉鑫, 李杨, 李晓东, 赵颖杰, 张凌, 刘乐乐. 基于连续-离散介质耦合的水合物储层出砂数值模拟[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(5): 629-642.
[9]	计秉玉. 对油气藏工程研究方法发展趋势的几点认识[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(12): 1774-1778.
[10]	郭建春, 任冀川, 王世彬, 苟波, 赵俊生, 伍林. 裂缝性致密碳酸盐岩储层酸压多场耦合数值模拟与应用[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(10): 1219-1228.
[11]	刘修善. 邻井距离解算及防碰评价[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(8): 983-989.
[12]	韩强, 屈展, 叶正寅. 基于多尺度均匀化理论的页岩强度表征[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(7): 858-865.
[13]	苏皓, 雷征东, 李俊超, 龚斌, 赵文琪, 鞠斌山, 张荻萩, 秦鹤. 储集层多尺度裂缝高效数值模拟模型[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(5): 587-593,634.
[14]	解宁, 李文婧. 地下盐穴储气库盐岩热损伤机理[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(3): 357-369,382.
[15]	吴俊晨, 范宜仁, 曹军涛, 范卓颖, 王小龙, 吴飞. 基于大尺寸地层模型的砂岩储层油基钻井液侵入模拟[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(11): 1407-1414.