苏北盆地上白垩统泰州组油气成藏期综合分析

doi:10.7623/syxb201002002

石油学报 ›› 2010, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (2): 180-186.DOI: 10.7623/syxb201002002

苏北盆地上白垩统泰州组油气成藏期综合分析

宋宁 1,3 王铁冠 2 陈莉琼 3 辛仁臣 1

1中国地质大学海洋学院北京 100083； 2中国石油大学油气资源与探测国家重点实验室北京 102249； 3中国石化江苏油田地质科学研究院江苏扬州 225000

收稿日期:2009-05-30 修回日期:2009-09-20 出版日期:2010-03-25 发布日期:2013-10-31
通讯作者: 宋宁

Comprehensive analysis on hydrocarbon accumulation period of Upper Cretaceous Taizhou Formation in Subei Basin

SONG Ning 1,3 WANG Tieguan 2 CHEN Liqiong 3 XIN Renchen 1

Received:2009-05-30 Revised:2009-09-20 Online:2010-03-25 Published:2013-10-31
Contact: SONG Ning

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

苏北盆地是中国东部唯一在上白垩统泰州组发现烃源岩的盆地，对其成藏期的研究是油气成藏模式和富集规律研究的重要内容。对其中东部上白垩统泰州组的埋藏史、热演化史和生烃史进行了数值模拟，对48件储层样品的流体包裹体岩相特征进行了观察及均一温度测定分析。研究认为，泰州组经历持续沉降—短暂抬升—再沉降的过程，发育3期烃类包裹体，而抬升和沉降幅度的差异导致不同凹陷和同一凹陷不同部位生烃和成藏期的差异。海安凹陷泰州组从始新世三垛末期至现今大量生烃，油气在上新世盐城期开始连续充注成藏。高邮凹陷泰州组从古新世阜宁末期到始新世三垛末期大量生烃，油气在始新世三垛期开始连续充注成藏，较海安凹陷早。油气主要成藏期与烃源岩大量生排烃期和圈闭形成时间匹配，有利于该区油气充注成藏。

关键词: 苏北盆地, 泰州组, 白垩系, 成藏期, 流体包裹体, 热演化

Abstract:

Hydrocarbon accumulation period is the important content for researching the reservoir-forming pattern and hydrocarbon enrichment laws. The hydrocarbon source rock of the Upper Cretaceous Taizhou Formation in Subei Basin was only discovered in the eastern China at present. The history of burial, thermal evolution and hydrocarbon generation in the Upper Cretaceous Taizhou Formation were simulated. The fluid inclusions of 48 samples from the reservoirs in Taizhou Formation were investigated on the observation of lithofacie features and homogeneous temperature. The results showed that hydrocarbon source rock in Taizhou Formation experienced the continual subside-briefly lifting-secondary subside period. The divergences of hydrocarbon generation history and hydrocarbon accumulation period between Hai’an Sag and Gaoyou Sag were caused by the difference of subsides and lifting amplitudes. In Hai’an Sag, hydrocarbon of Taizhou Formation was generated from the Late Eocene Sanduo Period to the Quaternary and continuously charged and massively accumulated in the Pliocene Yancheng and Quaternary periods. Hydrocarbon of Taizhou Formation in Gaoyou Sag was generated from the Late Palaeocene Funing Period to the Eocene Sanduo Period and continuously charged and massively accumulated from the Eocene Sanduo Period to the Quaternary. The main charging timing of reservoirs matches with hydrocarbon generation and exclusion periods, which is favorable for petroleum accumulation in these areas.

Key words: Subei Basin, Taizhou Formation, Cretaceous, hydrocarbon accumulation period, fluid inclusion, thermal evolution

宋宁;王铁冠陈莉琼辛仁臣. 苏北盆地上白垩统泰州组油气成藏期综合分析[J]. 石油学报, 2010, 31(2): 180-186.

SONG Ning;WANG Tieguan CHEN Liqiong XIN Renchen. Comprehensive analysis on hydrocarbon accumulation period of Upper Cretaceous Taizhou Formation in Subei Basin[J]. Editorial office of ACTA PETROLEI SINICA, 2010, 31(2): 180-186.

参考文献

[1]陈红汉.油气成藏年代学研究进展[J].石油与天然气地质,2007,28(2):143-150.

Chen Honghan.Advances in geochronology of hydrocarbon accumulation[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2007,28(2):143-150.

[2]王飞宇,金之钧,吕修祥,等.含油气盆地成藏期分析理论和新方法[J].地球科学进展,2002,17(5):754-762.

Wang Feiyu,Jin Zhijun,Lü Xiuxiang,et al.Timing of petroleum accumulation: Theory and new methods[J].Aadvance in Earth Sciences,2002,17(5):754-762.

[3]张鼐，邢永亮，曾云，等.塔东地区寒武系白云岩的流体包裹体特征及生烃期次研究[J].石油学报，2009，30(5):692-697.

Zhang Nai，Xing Yongliang，Zeng Yun，et al.Characteristics of fluid inclusions of Cambrian dolomite and hydrocarbon-generation history in the Eastern Tarim Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica，2009，30(5):692-697.

[4]陶士振.包裹体应用于油气地质研究的前提条件和关键问题[J].地质科学,2004,39(1):77-91.

Tao Shizhen.Premise conditions and key problems of applied study of inclusion in oil-gas geology[J].Chinese Journal of Geology,2004,39(1):77-91.

[5]陈艳鹏,刘震,马达德,等.柴西南区岩性油藏的形成过程[J].石油学报,2009,30(2):189-193.

Chen Yanpeng,Liu Zhen,Ma Dade,et al.Accumulation process of lithologic pools in Southwestern Qaidam Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2009,30(2):189-193.

[6]王永建,王延斌,郑亚斌，等.苏北盆地高邮凹陷泰州组烃源岩演化[J].石油实验地质,2007，29(4):7-9.

Wang Yongjian,Wang Yanbin,Zheng Yabin,et al.Hydrocarbon source rock evolution in Taizhou Formation,the Gaoyou Sag,the North Jiangsu Basin[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2007，29(4)：7-9.

[7]朱建辉,江兴歌,徐旭辉，等.苏北盆地海安凹陷曲塘—李堡地区新生代演化和油气响应评价[J].石油实验地质,2005,27(2):138-143.

Zhu Jianhui,Jiang Xingge,Xu Xuhui,et al.The Cenozoic evolution and petroleum response estimation in the Qutang-Libao region of the Hai’an Depression,the North Jiangsu Basin[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2005,27(2):138-143.

[8]朱筱敏,刘长利,张亚雄,等.苏北盆地上白垩统泰州组砂岩成岩序列和储集层质量主控因素分析[J].古地理学报,2008,10(5):439-446.

Zhu Xiaomin,Liu Changli,Zhang Yaxiong,et al.Sandstone diagenetic succession and major factors controlling reservoir quality of the Taizhou Formation of Upper Cretaceous in Subei Basin[J].Journal of Palaeogeography,2008,10(5):439-446.

[9]张金亮,刘宝珺，毛凤鸣，等.苏北盆地高邮凹陷北斜坡阜宁组成岩作用及储层特征[J].石油学报，2003，24(2):43-49.

Zhang Jinliang,Liu Baojun，Mao Fengming，et al.Clastic diagenesis and reservoir characteristics of Funing Formation in north slope of Gaoyou Depression in Subei Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica，2003，24(2):43-49.

[10]毛凤鸣,陈安定,严元锋,等.苏北盆地复杂小断块油气成藏特征及地震识别技术[J].石油与天然气地质,2006,27(6):827-839.

Mao Fengming,Chen Anding,Yan Yuanfeng,et al.Hydrocarbon pooling features and seismic recognizing technologies of small complex fault blocks in Subei Basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2006,27(6):827-839.

[11]刘宏宇.苏北盆地上白垩统典型油气藏与成藏模式预测[J].海洋石油,2006,26(1):11-16.

Liu Hongyu.Prognosis of the reservoir formation model and typical hydrocarbon reservoir of Upper Cretaceous in Subei Basin [J].Offshore Oil,2006,26(1):11-16.

[12]陈安定.苏北第三系成熟演化指标与深度关系的3种模式[J].石油实验地质,2003,25(1):58-63.

Chen Anding.Three models of relationship between the maturity indexes and the depth in the Northern Jiangsu Tertiary Basin [J].Experimental Petroleum Geology,2003,25(1):58-63.

[13]肖卫勇,王良书,李华,等.渤海盆地地温场研究[J].中国海上油气,2001,15(2):107-110.

Xiao Weiyong，Wang Liangshu，Li Hua,et al.Geotemperature field in Bohai Sea[J].China Offshore Oil and Gas,2001,15(2):107-110.

[14]丁增勇，王良书，胡文瑄，等.利用岩石圈瞬态热流模型重建渤海湾盆地新生代热历史[J].石油学报，2008，29(5):650-656.

Ding Zengyong，Wang Liangshu，Hu Wenxuan，et al.Reconstruction of Cenozoic thermal history of Bohai Bay Basin with a transient heat flow model[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica，2008，29(5):650-656.

[15]武守诚.中国油气盆地的系统研究[J].石油学报,1993,14(4):20-31.

Wu Shoucheng.A systematic study of the Chinese petroliferous basins[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,1993,14(4):20-31.

[16]米立军，袁玉松，张功成，等.南海北部深水区地热特征及其成因[J].石油学报，2009，30(1):27-32.

Mi Lijun，Yuan Yusong，Zhang Gongcheng，et al.Characteristics and genesis of geothermal field in deep-water area of the northern South China Sea[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica，2009，30(1):27-32.

[17]胡圣标,何丽娟,汪集旸.中国大陆地区大地热流数据汇编(第三版)[J].地球物理学报, 2001, 44(5):611-626.

Hu Shengbiao,He Lijuan,Wang Jiyang.Compilation of heat flow data in the China continental area(3rd edition)[J].Chinese Journal of Geophysics,2001,44(5):611-626.

[18]李明诚,单秀琴,马成华,等.油气成藏期探讨[J].新疆石油地质,2005,26(5):587-591.

Li Mingcheng,Shan Xiuqin,Ma Chenghua,et al.An approach to hydrocarbon accumulation period[J].Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2005,26(5):587-591.

[19]姜振学,庞雄奇,金之钧,等.地层抬升过程中的砂体回弹作用及其油气成藏效应[J].地球科学——中国地质大学学报,2004,29 (4): 420-426.

Jiang Zhenxue,Pang Xiongqi,Jin Zhijun,et al.Relationship between pore variation of reservoir and rebounding of sandstone during uplift and its application to the Daqing Oilfield[J].Earth Science：Journal of China University of Geosciences,2004,29(4): 420-426.

苏北盆地上白垩统泰州组油气成藏期综合分析

Comprehensive analysis on hydrocarbon accumulation period of Upper Cretaceous Taizhou Formation in Subei Basin

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	罗涛, 郭小文, 舒志国, 包汉勇, 何生, 覃泽健, 肖智慧. 四川盆地焦石坝南部地区五峰组—龙马溪组裂缝脉体流体来源及形成时间[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(5): 611-622.
[2]	郭小文, 陈家旭, 袁圣强, 何生, 赵建新. 含油气盆地激光原位方解石U-Pb年龄对油气成藏年代的约束——以渤海湾盆地东营凹陷为例[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(3): 284-291.
[3]	邱楠生, 冯乾乾, 腾格尔, 申宝剑, 马中良, 俞凌杰, 曹爱强. 川东南丁山地区燕山期—喜马拉雅期差异构造-热演化与页岩气保存[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(12): 1610-1622.
[4]	朱明, 张向涛, 黄玉平, 朱俊章, 龙祖烈, 史玉玲, 石创, 张小龙. 珠江口盆地烃源岩特征及资源潜力[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(s1): 53-68.
[5]	罗静兰, 何敏, 庞雄, 李弛, 柳保军, 雷川, 马永坤, 庞江. 珠江口盆地南部热演化事件与高地温梯度的成岩响应及其对油气勘探的启示[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(s1): 90-104.
[6]	胡圣标, 龙祖烈, 朱俊章, 胡迪, 黄玉平, 史玉玲, 胡杰. 珠江口盆地地温场特征及构造-热演化[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(s1): 178-187.
[7]	鲁雪松, 赵孟军, 陈竹新, 李学义, 胡瀚文, 卓勤功. 准噶尔盆地南缘齐古油田油气成藏再认识及勘探启示[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(9): 1045-1058,1115.
[8]	刘刚, 卫延召, 陈棡, 贾开富, 龚德瑜, 王峰, 孙靖, 朱峰, 麻伟娇. 准噶尔盆地腹部侏罗系-白垩系次生油气藏形成机制及分布特征[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(8): 914-927.
[9]	田孝茹, 张元元, 卓勤功, 于志超, 郭召杰. 准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷下二叠统风城组致密油充注特征——碱性矿物中的流体包裹体证据[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(6): 646-659.
[10]	刘建良, 刘可禹, 姜振学, 邢金艳. 库车前陆盆地玉东地区白垩系油气成藏过程[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(6): 620-630.
[11]	高志勇, 王晓琦, 李建明, 崔京钢, 金旭, 周川闽, 冯佳睿, 石雨昕. 库车坳陷克拉苏构造带白垩系储层孔喉组合类型定量表征与展布[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(6): 645-659.
[12]	李文, 何生, 张柏桥, 何治亮, 陈曼霏, 张殿伟, 李天义, 高键. 焦石坝背斜西缘龙马溪组页岩复合脉体中流体包裹体的古温度及古压力特征[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(4): 402-415.
[13]	张江涛, 吴奎, 王冰洁, 何京, 康琳. 渤海海域辽西凸起北段新生代构造演化的磷灰石裂变径迹证据[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(11): 1262-1271.
[14]	郝彬, 赵文智, 胡素云, 石书缘, 高平, 王铜山, 黄士鹏, 姜华. 川中地区寒武系龙王庙组沥青成因与油气成藏史[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38(8): 863-875.
[15]	庄新兵, 顾忆, 邵志兵, 尤东华, 丁勇, 万旸璐. 塔里木盆地地温场对油气成藏过程的控制作用——以古城墟隆起为例[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38(5): 502-511.