AN OPTIMIZED INTERPRETATION PROCEDURE OF THREE PHASE FLOW IN PUMPING WELLS

doi:10.7623/syxb199601009

Editorial office of ACTA PETROLEI SINICA ›› 1996, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (1): 61-70.DOI: 10.7623/syxb199601009

• Petroleum Exploration • Previous Articles Next Articles

AN OPTIMIZED INTERPRETATION PROCEDURE OF THREE PHASE FLOW IN PUMPING WELLS

Guo Haimin¹, Dai Jiacai¹, Cai Jun¹, Zhao Hongmin¹, Zhang Baoqun², Zhong Xingfu²

1. Jianghan Paroleum Institute;
2. Daqing Petroleum Administration

Received:1995-01-24 Revised:1995-07-21 Online:1996-01-25 Published:2010-11-23

抽油井三相流动优化解释处理方法

郭海敏¹, 戴家才¹, 蔡军¹, 赵宏敏¹, 张宝群², 钟兴福²

1. 江汉石油学院;
2. 大庆石油管理局

作者简介:郭海敏,1985年毕业于江汉石油学院;1993年在北航从事博士后研究。现为江汉石油学院测井教研室教授。通讯处:湖北省荆沙市。邮政编码:434102。
基金资助:
中国石油天然气总公司“八五”攻关项目

Abstract

Abstract: This paper presents an optimized interpretation procedure that is different from the conventional one.This method,based on the slippage velocity model,first builds the theoretical response equation of turbine rotational velocity,average fluid density,water cut,tempreture and pressure,then derives the incoherent function of relative error.The above incoherent functions is transmitted to SUMT-Powell method for optimum processing.This application may improve the accuracy of production logging interpretation of three phase flow.

Key words: three phase flow, optimization, slippage velocity, production logging, well-log interpretation, pumping well

摘要： 本文提出一种不同于常规解释的优化解释处理方法.它以滑脱模型为基础建立关于涡轮转速、流体平均密度、含水率、温度和压力的理论响应方程,导出相应的误差非相关函数,传递给SUMT-Powell方法进行优化处理.为提高三相流动生产测井解释精度,提出了方法和模型方面质的跨越.

关键词: 三相流动, 最优化, 滑脱速度, 生产测井, 测井解释, 抽油井

Guo Haimin, Dai Jiacai, Cai Jun, Zhao Hongmin, Zhang Baoqun, Zhong Xingfu. AN OPTIMIZED INTERPRETATION PROCEDURE OF THREE PHASE FLOW IN PUMPING WELLS[J]. Editorial office of ACTA PETROLEI SINICA, 1996, 17(1): 61-70.

郭海敏, 戴家才, 蔡军, 赵宏敏, 张宝群, 钟兴福. 抽油井三相流动优化解释处理方法[J]. 石油学报, 1996, 17(1): 61-70.

[1]	Cui Chuanzhi, Zheng Wenqian, Zhu Yangwen, Yuan Fuqing, Wu Zhongwei, Sui Yingfei. A method for optimizing the location of infill wells exploited by viscosity reduction chemical flooding after steam huff and puff stimulation [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(12): 1643-1648,1656.
[2]	Dong Shimin, Wang Hongbo. Simulation model of lateral vibration of sucker rod string in directional wells and point arrangement optimization of centralizer [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(12): 1686-1696.
[3]	Guo Jianchun, Ren Jichuan, Wang Shibin, Gou Bo, Zhao Junsheng, Wu Lin. Numerical simulation and application of multi-field coupling of acid fracturing in fractured tight carbonate reservoirs [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(10): 1219-1228.
[4]	Chen Haihong, Zuo Lili, Wu Changchun, Li Qingping. Optimization on delivery schedules of a multiproduct pipeline based on the oil-demand mode [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2019, 40(8): 990-996.
[5]	Feng Qihong, Xu Shiqian, Ren Guotong, Wang Sen, Li Yuyao. Hierarchical optimization of well pattern parameters in multi-stage fractured horizontal well for tight oil [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2019, 40(7): 830-838.
[6]	Zhao Chuanwei, Wang Shaoxian, Pei Xueliang, Wu Zhonghua, Nie Yunfei, Zhou Hongguo, Sun Haoyu, Jiang Xue. Optimization design of counter-type full-bore fracturing sliding-sleeve [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2018, 39(4): 482-490.
[7]	Li Dawei, Shi Guangren. Optimization of common data mining algorithms for petroleum exploration and development [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2018, 39(2): 240-246.
[8]	Zhou Bin, Wang Yanjiang, Liu Weifeng, Liu Baodi. A working condition recognition method of sucker-rod pumping wells based on Hessian-regularized SVM and multi-view co-training algorithm [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2018, 39(12): 1429-1436.
[9]	Zhang Tao, Li Xiangfang, Wang Xiangzeng, Yan Yunkui, Qiao Xiangyang, Ma Cheng, Lei Kaiyu, Tang Peizhe, Feng Dong, Zhao Wen. Efficient mobilization method of stereoscopic well pattern in low-permeability complex superimposed tight reservoir: a case study of Yan'an gasfield [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2018, 39(11): 1279-1291.
[10]	Wang Hongbo, Dong Shimin, Gan Qingming, Xin Hong, Zhu Ge. Dynamic parameter simulation model of low-production pumping well and the ways to improve system efficiency [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2018, 39(11): 1299-1307.
[11]	Zhao Hui, Xie Pengfei, Cao Lin, Li Ying, Zhao Yanyan. Reservoir production optimization method based on inter-well connectivity [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2017, 38(5): 555-561.
[12]	Bao Jingwei, Li Li, Ye Jigen, Shi Junhui, Zhang Jin, Zhu Hongyun, Jiang Ning. Well location intelligent optimization method and its application for infill wells in high water cut complex fault-block oilfields [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2017, 38(4): 444-452,484.
[13]	Luo Wei, Lin Yongmao, Li Haitao, Jiang Zujun, Wu Qiang, Tao Zhengwu. ICD completion optimization design of horizontal wells in heterogeneous bottom-water reservoirs [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2017, 38(10): 1200-1209.
[14]	Jiang Min, Tan Chaodong, Li Jun, Cheng Xinping, Li Jingjia. Comparisons between protection fluid and nitrogen column in tube-casing annulus of gas storage wells [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2017, 38(10): 1210-1216.
[15]	Gao Jiajia, Deng Jingen, Yan Wei, Feng Yutian, Wang Houdong, Li Yang. Establishment of a prediction model for the borehole trajactory optimization based on controlling wellbore stability [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2016, 37(9): 1179-1186.

AN OPTIMIZED INTERPRETATION PROCEDURE OF THREE PHASE FLOW IN PUMPING WELLS

抽油井三相流动优化解释处理方法

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments