Gas-water two phase porous flow model of fractured horizontal well in shale gas reservoir

doi:10.7623/syxb201609011

Acta Petrolei Sinica ›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (9): 1165-1170.DOI: 10.7623/syxb201609011

• Oil Field Development • Previous Articles Next Articles

Gas-water two phase porous flow model of fractured horizontal well in shale gas reservoir

Guo Xiaozhe¹, Wang Jing¹, Liu Xuefeng²

1. College of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China;
2. Energy Tech-Drilling & Production Co., CNOOC Energy Technology & Services Limited, Tianjin 300452, China

Received:2015-12-15 Revised:2016-06-21 Online:2016-09-25 Published:2016-09-30

页岩气储层压裂水平井气-水两相渗流模型

郭小哲¹, 王晶¹, 刘学锋²

1. 中国石油大学石油工程学院北京 102249;
2. 中海油能源发展股份有限公司工程技术分公司天津 300452

通讯作者: 郭小哲,男,1975年2月生,1999年获大庆石油学院石油工程专业学士学位,2005年获中国石油大学(北京)油气田开发专业博士学位,现为中国石油大学(北京)石油工程学院副教授、硕士生导师,主要从事油气渗流理论与应用研究工作。Email:mbahgg@163.com
作者简介:郭小哲,男,1975年2月生,1999年获大庆石油学院石油工程专业学士学位,2005年获中国石油大学(北京)油气田开发专业博士学位,现为中国石油大学(北京)石油工程学院副教授、硕士生导师,主要从事油气渗流理论与应用研究工作。Email:mbahgg@163.com
基金资助:
中国石油大学（北京）科研基金项目“页岩气藏压裂水平井气水两相渗流机理研究”（2462015YQ0215）资助。

Abstract

Abstract:

It has been an important scientific issue to quantitatively calculate the influence degree of water content on gas output after horizontal well fracturing in shale gas reservoirs. The flow mechanics, reservoir numerical simulation and petro-physics, and other basic theories and methods were applied to establish a dual-media gas-water two phase porous flow model considering absorption-desorption, diffusion, detachment and stress sensitivity. Meanwhile, differential dispersion and equation coefficients linearization were performed to obtain a numerical model. Through case application, this newly created model was applied to predict water and gas output and comparatively analyze the influences of water saturation, fracture network parameters, diffusion, detachment and stress sensitivity on gas well production. The results show that the output recovery magnitude and stable production duration are determined by original water saturation. The smaller the original water saturation is, the larger the influence of fracturing fluid flow back rate on production will be. When fracture conductivity and the half length of fracture network are large, the increase of both values will lead to the reduction of yield rate. The diffusion effect is weaker than detachment effect, while the effect of stress sensitivity is significantly greater than that of diffusion and detachment. Therefore, stress sensitivity should be focused for the target of yield increase and stabilization.

Key words: shale gas, porous flow of gas-water two phase, numerical simulation, fracturing, diffusion, detachment, stress sensitivity

摘要：

针对定量计算页岩气储层水平井压裂后含水对产气量影响程度的问题，应用渗流力学、油藏数值模拟及油层物理学等理论与方法，建立了考虑解吸-吸附、扩散、滑脱及应力敏感的双重介质气-水两相渗流模型，并进行了差分离散及方程组系数线性化处理，建立了数值模型。利用新模型对页岩气储层压裂水平井进行了气、水产量的预测，并对比分析了不同含水饱和度、压裂缝网参数、扩散、滑脱及应力敏感等对气井生产的影响。结果表明，原始含水饱和度决定产量回升幅度和稳产时间，原始含水饱和度越小，压裂液返排率对产量影响越大；当裂缝导流能力和缝网区域半长较大时，再提高其增产幅度会减小；扩散作用弱于滑脱作用，应力敏感作用要明显大于扩散和滑脱，增产稳产目标要重点考虑应力敏感。

关键词: 页岩气, 气-水两相渗流, 数值模拟, 压裂, 扩散, 滑脱, 应力敏感

CLC Number:

TE312

Guo Xiaozhe, Wang Jing, Liu Xuefeng. Gas-water two phase porous flow model of fractured horizontal well in shale gas reservoir[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2016, 37(9): 1165-1170.

郭小哲, 王晶, 刘学锋. 页岩气储层压裂水平井气-水两相渗流模型[J]. 石油学报, 2016, 37(9): 1165-1170.

References

[1] 杜殿发,王妍妍,付金刚,等.页岩气藏渗流机理及压力动态分析[J].计算物理,2015,32(1):51-57.
Du Dianfa,Wang Yanyan,Fu Jingang,et al.Shale gas seepage mechanism and transient pressure analysis[J].Chinese Journal of Computational Physics,2015,32(1):51-57.
[2] 夏阳,金衍,陈勉.页岩气渗流过程中的多场耦合机理[J].中国科学:物理学力学天文学,2015,45(9):094703.
Xia Yang,Jin Yan,Chen Mian.The coupling of multi-physics for gas flow in shale reservoirs[J].Scientia Sinica:Physica,Mechanica & Astronomica,2015,45(9):094703.
[3] 樊冬艳,姚军,孙海,等.页岩气藏分段压裂水平井不稳定渗流模型[J].中国石油大学学报:自然科学版,2014,38(5):116-123.
Fan Dongyan,Yao Jun,Sun Hai,et al.Transient flow model of stage-fractured horizontal wells in shale gas reservoirs[J].Journal of China University of Petroleum:Edition of Natural Science,2014,38(5):116-123.
[4] 段永刚,李建秋.页岩气无限导流压裂井压力动态分析[J].天然气工业,2010,30(10):26-29.
Duan Yonggang,Li Jianqiu.Transient pressure analysis of infinite conductivity fractured wells for shale gas[J].Natural Gas Industry,2010,30(10):26-29.
[5] Wu Yushu,Wang Cong,Ding D.Transient pressure analysis of gas wells in unconventional reservoirs[R].SPE 160889,2012.
[6] Chen C C,Rajagopal R.A multiply-fractured horizontal well in a rectangular drainage region[R].SPE 37072,1997.
[7] 高杰,张烈辉,刘启国,等.页岩气藏压裂水平井三线性流试井模型研究[J].水动力学研究与进展A辑,2014,29(1):108-113.
Gao Jie,Zhang Liehui,Liu Qiguo,et al.Well test model of trilinear flow for fractured horizontal wells in shale gas reservoirs[J].Chinese Journal of Hydrodynamics,2014,29(1):108-113.
[8] 温庆志,翟学宁,罗明良,等.页岩气藏压裂返排参数优化设计[J].特种油气藏,2013,20(5):137-140.
Wen Qingzhi,Zhai Xuening,Luo Mingliang,et al.Optimal design of fracturing fluid recovery parameters for shale gas reservoirs[J].Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs,2013,20(5):137-140.
[9] 程远方,李友志,时贤,等.页岩气体积压裂缝网模型分析及应用[J].天然气工业,2013,33(9):53-59.
Cheng Yuanfang,Li Youzhi,Shi Xian,et al.Analysis and application of fracture network models of volume fracturing in shale gas reservoirs[J].Natural Gas Industry,2013,33(9):53-59.
[10] 时贤,程远方,蒋恕,等.页岩储层裂缝网络延伸模型及其应用[J].石油学报,2014,35(6):1130-1137.
Shi Xian,Cheng Yuanfang,Jiang Shu,et al.Simulation of complex fracture network propagation and its application for shale gas reservoir[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2014,35(6):1130-1137.
[11] 胡嘉,姚猛.页岩气水平井多段压裂产能影响因素数值模拟研究[J].石油化工应用,2013,32(5):34-39.
Hu Jia,Yao Meng.Multiple fracturing of horizontal well in shale gas productivity factors numerical simulation researching[J].Petrochemical Industry Application,2013,32(5):34-39.
[12] 梁利平.页岩气藏体积压裂评价及产能模拟研究[D].西安:西北大学,2014.
Liang Liping.Evaluation and production simulation of hydraulic fracturing by stimulated reservoir volume in shale gas revervoirs[D].Xi'an:Northwest University,2014.
[13] Wu Keliu,Li Xiangfang,Yu Wei,et al.A model for surface diffusion of adsorbed gas in nanopores of shale gas reservoirs[R].SPE 25662,2015.
[14] Sun Hao,Chawathe A,Hoteit H,et al.Understanding shale gas flow behavior using numerical simulation [R].SPE 167753,2015.
[15] 尹虎,王新海,张芳,等.吸附气对气水两相流页岩气井井底压力的影响[J].断块油气田,2013,20(1):74-76.
Yin Hu,Wang Xinhai,Zhang Fang,et al.Influence of adsorbed gas on bottomhole pressure of shale gas wells with gas-water two-phase flow[J].Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field,2013,20(1):74-76.
[16] 王怀龙.页岩气藏渗流理论及单井数值模拟研究[D].成都:西南石油大学,2015.
Wang Huailong.Research on percolation mechanism and numerical simulation of the single well in the shale gas reservoir[D].Chengdu:Southwest Petroleum University,2015.
[17] 郭小哲,周长沙.基于扩散的页岩气藏压裂水平井渗流模型研究[J].西南石油大学学报:自然科学版,2015,37(3):38-44.
Guo Xiaozhe,Zhou Changsha.Diffusion seepage model for fractured horizontal well in shale gas reservoir[J].Journal of Southwest Petroleum University:Science & Technology Edition,2015,37(3):38-44.
[18] 盛茂,李根生,黄中伟,等.考虑表面扩散作用的页岩气瞬态流动模型[J].石油学报,2014,35(2):347-352.
Sheng Mao,Li Gensheng,Huang Zhongwei,et al.Shale gas transient flow model with effects of surface diffusion[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2014,35(2):347-352.
[19] 吴克柳,李相方,陈掌星.页岩气纳米孔气体传输模型[J].石油学报,2015,36(7):837-848.
Wu Keliu,Li Xiangfang,Chen Zhangxing.A model for gas transport through nanopores of shale gas reservoirs[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2015,36(7):837-848.
[20] 郭小哲,周长沙.基于滑脱的页岩气藏压裂水平井渗流模型及产能预测[J].石油钻采工艺,2015,37(3):61-65.
Guo Xiaozhe,Zhou Changsha.Seepage model and productivity forecast based on slippage of fractured horizontal wells in shale gas pool[J].Oil Drilling & Production Technology,2015,37(3):61-65.
[21] 郭小哲,周长沙.考虑应力敏感的页岩气藏压裂水平井渗流模型建立与分析[J].长江大学学报:自科科学版,2015,12(5):44-50.
Guo Xiaozhe,Zhou Changsha.Establishment of a seepage model considering the stress sensitivity in fractured horizontal wells in shale gas reservoirs and its analysis[J].Journal of Yangtze University:Natural Science Edition,2015,12(5):44-50.

Gas-water two phase porous flow model of fractured horizontal well in shale gas reservoir

页岩气储层压裂水平井气-水两相渗流模型

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	Xu Lin, Liu Shujie, Xu Mingbiao, Feng Huanzhi, Xing Xijin, Deng Jiajia. Self-adaptive repair behavior and mechanism of micro-defects of differential pressure activated sealant [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2021, 42(5): 686-694.
[2]	Mi Lidong. Inversion method of discrete fracture network of shale gas based on gas production profile [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2021, 42(4): 481-491.
[3]	Zou Wei, Yu Yixin, Liu Jinshui, Jiang Yiming, Tang Xianjun, Chen Shi, Yu Lang. Main controlling factors of the central inversional structure belt and the development of Ningbo anticline in Xihu sag,East China Sea Basin [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2021, 42(2): 176-185.
[4]	He Xiao, Wu Jianfa, Yong Rui, Zhao Shengxian, Zhou Xiaojin, Zhang Dongjun, Zhang Deliang, Zhong Chengxu. Accumulation conditions and key exploration and development technologies of marine shale gas field in Changning-Weiyuan block,Sichuan Basin [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2021, 42(2): 259-272.
[5]	Wei Bing, Shang Jin, Pu Wanfen, Zhao Jinzhou, Kadet Valeriy. Diffusion of CO₂ molecules in the carbonated water-crude oil system [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2021, 42(1): 64-72.
[6]	Liang Xing, Xu Zhengyu, Zhang Jiehui, Zhang Zhao, Li Zhaofeng, Jiang Pei, Jiang Liwei, Zhu Douxing, Liu Chen. Key efficient exploration and development technoloiges of shallow shale gas:a case study of Taiyang anticline area of Zhaotong National Shale Gas Demonstration Zone [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(9): 1033-1048.
[7]	Chen Hao, Zhou Tao, Fan Huaicai, Zhang Jian, Yang Shenglai. Preparation method and stress sensitivity of core samples with hydraulic fractures in shale reservoirs [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(9): 1117-1126.
[8]	Zhu Xiaohua, Luo Yunxu, Liu Weiji, Gao Rui, Jia Yudan, Liu Chengjun. Electrical breakdown experiment and numerical simulation method of rock-breaking mechanism of plasma electric pulse drilling [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(9): 1146-1162.
[9]	Li Junqian, Lu Shuangfang, Zhang Pengfei, Li Wenbiao, Jing Tieya, Feng Wenjun. Q uantitative characterization and microscopic occurrence mechanism of pore water in shale matrix [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(8): 979-990.
[10]	Jin Yan, Wei Shiming, Chen Kangping, Xia Yang. Self-diffusion flow model of tight gas [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(6): 737-744.
[11]	Li Wenjing, Jiang Yuan, Shan Baodong, Yu Xiaoshan, Wang Chao. Time-temperature effect on cavity stability during gas injection and production in gas storage with salt caves [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(6): 762-776.
[12]	Bi Haibin, Meng Hao, Gao Rili, Zheng Jing, Xu Xiaolin, Ju Xiujuan, Niu Wei, Zhang Jin, Zhou Mingqing, Zhao Lihua. Evaluation method of recoverable reserves of single well in undeveloped area of shale gas [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(5): 565-573.
[13]	Dou Xiaofeng, Ning Fulong, Li Yanlong, Liu Changling, Sun Jiaxin, Li Yang, Li Xiaodong, Zhao Yingjie, Zhang Ling, Liu Lele. Continuum-discrete coupling method for numerical simulation of sand production from hydrate reservoirs: a lab-scale case study [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(5): 629-642.
[14]	He Zhiliang, Nie Haikuan, Hu Dongfeng, Jiang Tingxue, Wang Ruyue, Zhang Yuying, Zhang Guangrong, Lu Zhiyuan. Geological problems in the effective development of deep shale gas: a case study of Upper Ordovician Wufeng-Lower Silurian Longmaxi formations in Sichuan Basin and its periphery [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(4): 379-391.
[15]	Wu Hongliang, Liu Peng, Wang Kewen, Xiao Chengwen, Feng Zhou, Xin Yi, Duan Wenxing, Li Yusheng. A method for recovery of reflection amplitude in dipole acoustic reflection imaging [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(4): 457-466.