压裂液破胶过程伤害微观机理

doi:10.7623/syxb201206013

石油学报 ›› 2012, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (6): 1018-1022.DOI: 10.7623/syxb201206013

压裂液破胶过程伤害微观机理

郭建春何春明

西南石油大学油气藏地质及开发工程国家重点实验室四川成都 610500

收稿日期:2012-06-11 修回日期:2012-09-02 出版日期:2012-11-25 发布日期:2012-12-07
通讯作者: 郭建春
作者简介:郭建春，男，1970年9月生，1998年获西南石油大学博士学位，现为西南石油大学教授、博士生导师，主要从事油气藏增产理论与技术方面的科研教学工作。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(No.51074138)以及四川省青平科技创新研究团队资助计划（2011JTD0018）资助。

Microscopic mechanism of the damage caused by gelout process of fracturing fluids

GUO Jianchun HE Chunming

Received:2012-06-11 Revised:2012-09-02 Online:2012-11-25 Published:2012-12-07

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

水力压裂改造后的残渣伤害一直是制约压裂改造效果提高的关键问题。常规破胶实验以及导流能力实验结果表明，瓜胶压裂液破胶过程产生的不溶物会导致储层受到伤害，并通过实验进行了论证。利用激光粒度仪研究了破胶过程中瓜胶尺寸的变化，利用凝胶渗透色谱仪研究了破胶过程中瓜胶分子量及其分布的变化，发现氧化破胶剂对瓜胶分子尺寸以及分子量的有效降解能力较差;通过高效液相色谱仪研究了破胶过程中瓜胶分子结构变化，并对破胶后残渣分子结构进行了定性分析，结果表明，破胶反应初期侧链半乳糖离解速率远大于主链甘露糖离解速率，使得瓜胶分子内M/G值大幅度提高，分子溶解性降低。氧化类破胶剂难以使瓜胶分子完全降解以及破胶过程中瓜胶溶解性降低2方面因素综合作用是破胶过程水不溶物产生的根本原因。

关键词: 水力压裂, 瓜胶, 分子尺寸, 分子结构, 破胶过程伤害

Abstract:

Residue damage after hydraulic fracturing is always a key factor that impairs fracturing results. Through the observation of conventional gelout experiments and the analysis of conductivity test results, we proposed that the gelout process of guar-gum fracturing fluids may generate residues that can damage the conductivity of fractures in reservoirs. At first, we examined molecular size and weight changes during the gelout process using a laser particle size analyzer and a gel permeation chromatograph, and found that the oxidizing breaker was ineffective in degrading the molecular size and weight. Then, we studied variations in guar molecular structures and qualitatively analyzed residue structures during the gelout process using a high performance liquid chromatography. The results show that galactose dissociates more fast than mannose during the early gelout stage, leading to a substantial increase of the M/G ratio within guar gum and a decrease of molecular solubility. Two comprehensive factors that oxidizing breakers can’t degrade guar-gum molecules completely and the molecular solubility of guar gum decreases during a gelout process are the fundamental reasons that cause the generation of water-insoluble residues during the gelout process.

Key words: hydraulic fracturing, guar gum, molecular size, molecular structure, damage caused by gelout process

郭建春何春明. 压裂液破胶过程伤害微观机理[J]. 石油学报, 2012, 33(6): 1018-1022.

GUO Jianchun HE Chunming. Microscopic mechanism of the damage caused by gelout process of fracturing fluids[J]. Editorial office of ACTA PETROLEI SINICA, 2012, 33(6): 1018-1022.

参考文献

[1] 王丽伟,卢拥军,单文文，等.瓜尔胶低分子量化降解条件研究[J].油田化学,2006,23(1):32-35.

Wang Liwei,Lu Yongjun,Shan Wenwen，et al.Enzyme degradation conditions for preparing low molecular guar gum as fracturing fluid thickener [J].Oilfield Chemistry,2006,23(1):32-35.

[2] 刘合,肖丹凤.新型低损害植物胶压裂液及其在低渗透储层中的应用[J].石油学报,2008,29（6）：880-884.

Liu He,Xiao Danfeng.A novel low-damage vegetable gum-based fracturing fluid and its application in low-permeability reservoirs[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2008,29(6):880-884.

[3] 吴金桥,张宁生,吴新民,等.微胶囊包裹化学生热压裂液体系及其工艺技术研究[J].石油学报,2005，26(5)：116-119．

Wu Jinqiao,Zhang Ningsheng,Wu Xinmin,et al.Fracturing fluid with microencapsulated heat- generating system and corresponding technology[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2005,26(5):116-119.

[4] 杨建军,叶仲斌,张绍彬,等.新型低伤害压裂液性能评价及现场试验[J].天然气工业,2004,24(6)：61-63.

Yang Jianjun,Ye Zhongbin,Zhang Shaobin,et al．Evaluation and application of new fracturing fluid with low damage[J].Natural Gas Industry,2004,24(6):61-63．

[5] 丛连铸,丁云宏,王世召,等.低渗储气层低伤害压裂液室内研究及实施[J].天然气工业,2004,24(11):55-57.

Cong Lianzhu,Ding Yunhong,Wang Shizhao，et al.Laboratory research on low damage fracturing fluid for low-permeability gas reservoirs and its application[J].Natural Gas Industry,2004,24(11):55-57．

[6] 王振铎,王晓泉,卢拥军.氧化碳泡沫压裂技术在低渗透低压气藏中的应用[J].石油学报,2004,25(3):66-70.

Wang Zhenduo,Wang Xiaoquan,Lu Yongjun.Application of carbon dioxide foam fracturing technology in low-permeability and low pressure gas reservoir[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2004,25(3):66-70.

[7] Weaver J,Schmelzl E,Jamieson M.New fluid technology allows fracturing without internal breakers[R].SPE 75690,2002.

[8] Weaver J，Parker M,Slabaugh B.Application of new viscoeastic fluid technology result in enhanced fracture productivity[R].SPE 71662,2001.

[9] Voneiff G M,Robinson B M,Holitch S A.The effect of unbroken fracture fluid on gas well performance[R].SPE 26664，1993.

[10] 何曼君,张东红,陈维孝，等.高分子物理[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,2007:128-134.

He Manjun,Zhang Donghong,Chen Weixiao,et al.Macromolecular physics[M].Shanghai:Fudan University Press,2007:128-134.

[11] 杜小弟,张安富,雷家珩,等.聚丙烯酸的凝胶渗透色谱分离及相对分子质量测定[J].分析测试学报,2011,30(2):167-170.

Du Xiaodi,Zhang Anfu,Lei Jiaheng,et al.Separation of polyacrylic acid and determination of its relative molecular mass by gel permeation chromatography[J].Journal of Instrumental Analysis,2011,30(2):167-170.

[12] Cheng Y,Brown K M，Robert K,et al.Characterization and intermolecular interactions of hydroxypropyl guar solutions[J].Biomacromolecules，2002,3(3):456-461.

[13] Nathan S M,Christine M L,Michael R L.Characterization of acid catalytic domains for cellulose hydrolysis and glucose degradation[J].Biotechnology and Bioengineering,2002,79(6):610-618.

[14] McDonald C E.The application of a reduced polymer borate system[R].SPE 94202,2005.

[15] Burke D,Park J O.Diffusion of macromolecules in polymer solutions and gels:a laser scanning confocal microscopy study[J].Macromolecules，2000,33(20):7400-7507.

压裂液破胶过程伤害微观机理

Microscopic mechanism of the damage caused by gelout process of fracturing fluids

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	师庆民, 赵奔, 王双明, 李新, 李春昊, 韩波, 米奕臣, 何羽飞, 蔡玥, 张哲豪, 冀瑞君. 三塘湖盆地侏罗系富油煤特征及沉积环境控制[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(5): 787-803.
[2]	刘永革, 李果, 贾伟, 白雅洁, 侯健, Clarke M A, 徐鸿志, 赵二猛, 纪云开, 陈立涛, 郭天魁, 贺甲元, 张乐. 储层改造对Ⅰ类天然气水合物藏降压开发效果的影响规律[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(2): 412-426,460.
[3]	唐慧莹, 梁海鹏, 张烈辉, 覃建华, 李扬, 张景. 砾岩储层水力裂缝扩展形态及影响因素[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(6): 871-884.
[4]	何骁, 吴建发, 雍锐, 赵圣贤, 周小金, 张洞君, 张德良, 钟成旭. 四川盆地长宁—威远区块海相页岩气田成藏条件及勘探开发关键技术[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(2): 259-272.
[5]	蒲春生, 郑恒, 杨兆平, 高振东. 水平井分段体积压裂复杂裂缝形成机制研究现状与发展趋势[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(12): 1734-1743.
[6]	张宏源, 黄中伟, 李根生, 陆沛青, 田守嶒, 李小江. 煤岩径向井-脉动水力压裂裂缝扩展规律与声发射响应特征[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(4): 472-481.
[7]	刘顺, 何衡, 赵倩云, 周德胜. 水力裂缝与天然裂缝交错延伸规律[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(3): 320-326,334.
[8]	赵金洲, 彭瑀, 林啸, 刘作磊, 许文俊. 考虑复杂应力分布的数值缝宽计算模型及其应用[J]. 石油学报, 2016, 37(7): 914-920.
[9]	蔡路, 姚艳斌, 张永平, 魏宁, 杨艳磊, 刘志华. 沁水盆地郑庄区块煤储层水力压裂曲线类型及其地质影响因素[J]. 石油学报, 2015, 36(s1): 83-90.
[10]	韩贝贝, 秦勇, 张志军, 尹诗, 汪岗, 郑书洁. 太原西山煤田现代构造应力场综合模拟[J]. 石油学报, 2015, 36(11): 1392-1401.
[11]	时贤, 程远方, 蒋恕, 李友志, 孙元伟, 王欣. 页岩储层裂缝网络延伸模型及其应用[J]. 石油学报, 2014, 35(6): 1130-1137.
[12]	张士诚, 郭天魁, 周彤, 邹雨时, 牟松茹. 天然页岩压裂裂缝扩展机理试验[J]. 石油学报, 2014, 35(3): 496-503,518.
[13]	李文阳, 邹洪岚, 吴纯忠, 王永辉. 从工程技术角度浅析页岩气的开采[J]. 石油学报, 2013, 34(6): 1218-1224.
[14]	张东晓, 杨婷云. 页岩气开发综述[J]. 石油学报, 2013, 34(4): 792-801.
[15]	朱海燕, 邓金根, 刘书杰, 闫伟, 陈峥嵘, 文敏, 彭成勇. 定向射孔水力压裂起裂压力的预测模型[J]. 石油学报, 2013, 34(3): 556-562.