渝东南下寒武统页岩储层特征及测井评价——以渝科1井和酉科1井为例

doi:10.7623/syxb201402003

石油学报 ›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (2): 233-244.DOI: 10.7623/syxb201402003

渝东南下寒武统页岩储层特征及测井评价——以渝科1井和酉科1井为例

曹晓萌¹, 于炳松¹, 李心童², 孙梦迪¹, 张玲³

1. 中国地质大学地球科学与资源学院北京 100083;
2. 英国爱丁堡大学地球科学学院爱丁堡 EH9 3JG;
3. 大庆钻探工程公司测井公司黑龙江大庆 163412

收稿日期:2013-10-16 修回日期:2014-01-22 出版日期:2014-03-25 发布日期:2014-04-11
通讯作者: 于炳松，男，1962年11月生，1982年毕业于浙江煤炭工业学校，1994年获中国地质大学（北京）博士学位，现为中国地质大学（北京）教授、博士生导师，主要从事储层地质学、含油气盆地分析、地球化学方面的研究。Email：yubs@cugb.edu.cn
作者简介:曹晓萌，女，1990年10月生，2012年获中国地质大学（北京）地质学学士学位，现为中国地质大学（北京）矿物学、岩石学、矿床学专业硕士研究生，主要从事沉积学方面的研究。Email：229590347@qq.com
基金资助:
高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金优先发展领域课题“中国南方海相富有机质页岩天然气吸附机理与储气性能研究”（20120022130001）和国土资源部全国页岩气资源战略调查项目（2009GYXQ15-04）资助。

Reservoir characteristics and evaluation on logging of the Lower Cambrian gas shale in southeast Chongqing：a case study of Well Yuke 1 and Well Youke 1

Cao Xiaomeng¹, Yu Bingsong¹, Li Xintong², Sun Mengdi¹, Zhang Ling³

1. School of Geosciences and Resources, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China;
2. School of Geosciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, UK;
3. Wireline Logging Company of Daqing Drilling & Exploration Engineering Corporation, Daqing 163412, China

Received:2013-10-16 Revised:2014-01-22 Online:2014-03-25 Published:2014-04-11

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为了正确认识渝东南地区下寒武统牛蹄塘组黑色页岩储层特征与主控因素，对采自渝科1井和酉科1井的岩心样品，进行了系统的黏土矿物及全岩X-射线衍射分析、岩石常规物性分析、比表面和孔径分析、岩石有机碳分析、镜质体反射率（R_o）及显微组分测试。测试分析结果表明：牛蹄塘组页岩储层碎屑矿物含量平均为51.34%，黏土矿物含量平均为32.74%，有效孔隙度平均为1.2%，渗透率平均为8.0×10^-3mD，属于特低孔、特低渗储层。孔隙以中孔为主，约占总孔体积的73% 。BET（Brunauer、Emmett和Teller）比表面积平均为7.75 m²/g，平均孔直径为5.3 nm。总有机碳含量（TOC）平均为2.29%，R_o平均为3.12%，属于过成熟阶段。进一步统计分析表明：TOC与微孔体积呈正相关，黏土矿物总量与之呈负相关；TOC、黏土矿物总量、碳酸盐矿物含量均与中孔体积呈正相关；TOC、碳酸盐矿物含量均与宏孔体积呈正相关，碎屑矿物含量与之呈弱的正相关，黏土矿物总量与之呈负相关。用常规测井方法对牛蹄塘组页岩的孔隙度和TOC进行了计算，发现利用中子曲线计算的孔隙度与岩心分析结果在两口井中均吻合较好，但浅层不含油气情况下，自然伽马曲线（GR）与岩心分析TOC之间无明显相关关系。

关键词: 页岩, 储层特征, 多元线性回归, 牛蹄塘组, 渝科1井

Abstract:

To correctly recognize reservoir characteristics and their controlling factors of the Lower Cambrian black shales of Niutitang Formation in southeast Chongqing, the following tests are systematically performed on the core samples collected from Well Yuke 1 and Well Youke 1, including clay minerals and whole rock X-rays diffraction analysis, and analyses on common petrophysical properties, pore size and specific surface area, organic carbon in rock, vitrinite reflectance (R_o) and maceral composition. The test results show that the average content of detrital minerals and clay minerals in the shale reservoirs of Niutitang Formation is 51.34% and 32.74%, and the average effective porosity and permeability is 1.2% and 8.0×10^-3 mD respectively, demonstrating these reservoirs are of ultra-low porosity and permeability. Moreover, mesopores as the main type account for 73% of the total pore volume. The average BET (Brunauer, Emmett and Teller) specific surface area is 7.75 m²/g, and the pore diameter is 5.3 nm; the total content of organic carbon (TOC) has an average of 2.29%, and the average R_o is 3.12%, indicating that the shale reservoirs are in the over-mature stage. Further statistical analysis shows that TOC is positively correlated with micropore volume, while the total content of clay minerals is negatively correlated with it; TOC, the total content of clay minerals and the content of carbonate minerals are positively correlated with mesopore volume; TOC and the content of carbonate minerals are positively correlated with macropore volume, and the content of detrital minerals has weakly positiue Correlation with it, whereas the total content of clay minerals is negatively correlated with it. The TOC and porosity of shales in Niutitang Formation are calculated using conventional logging method. It is discovered that the porosity calculated according to the neutron curve fits well with core analysis results in both Well Yuke 1 and Well Youke 1. However, in the shallow layers without gas and oil, gamma-ray curve has no obvious correlation with TOC obtained by core analysis.

Key words: shale, reservoir characteristics, multiple linear regression, Niutitang Formation, Well Yuke 1

中图分类号:

P631.8

曹晓萌, 于炳松, 李心童, 孙梦迪, 张玲. 渝东南下寒武统页岩储层特征及测井评价——以渝科1井和酉科1井为例[J]. 石油学报, 2014, 35(2): 233-244.

Cao Xiaomeng, Yu Bingsong, Li Xintong, Sun Mengdi, Zhang Ling. Reservoir characteristics and evaluation on logging of the Lower Cambrian gas shale in southeast Chongqing：a case study of Well Yuke 1 and Well Youke 1[J]. ACTA PETROLEI SINICA, 2014, 35(2): 233-244.

参考文献

[1] Curtis J B.Fractured shale-gas systems[J].AAPG Bulletin, 2002, 86(11):1921-1938.
[2] Martini A M, Walter L M, Budai J M, et al.Genetic and temporal relations between formation waters and biogenic methane:Upper Devonian Antrim Shale, Michigan Basin, USA[J].Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 1998, 62(10):1699-1720.
[3] 董大忠, 邹才能, 杨桦, 等.中国页岩气勘探开发进展与发展前景[J].石油学报, 2012, 33(增刊1):107-114.
Dong Dazhong, Zou Caineng, Yang Hua, et al.Progress and prospects of shale gas exploration and development in China[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2012, 33(S1):107-114.
[4] 于海峰.全国页岩气资源潜力调查评价和有利区优选成果新闻发布会[EB/OL].[2012-03-01].http://www.mlr.gov.cn/wszb/2012/yyqzy/.
Yu Haifeng.Survey and Evaluation of National Shale Gas Resource Potential and Favorable Area Optimization Achievement Press Conference[EB/OL].[2012-03-01].http://www.mlr.gov.cn/wszb/2012/yyqzy/.
[5] U.S.Energy Information Administration.Technically Recoverable Shale Oil and Shale Gas Resources:An Assessment of 137 Shale Formations in 41 Countries Outside the United States[R/OL].U.S.Department of Energy,[2013-06-13].http://www.eia.gov/analysis/studies/worldshalegas/.
[6] 李建忠, 郑民, 张国生, 等.中国常规与非常规天然气资源潜力及发展前景[J].石油学报, 2012, 33(增刊1):89-98.
Li Jianzhong, Zheng Min, Zhang Guosheng, et al.Potential and prospects of conventional and unconventional natural gas resource in China[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2012, 33(S1):89-98.
[7] 赵勇, 杨海波.页岩气开发现状及成功开发页岩气的关键因素[J].中外能源, 2011, 16(7):47-50.
Zhao Yong, Yang Haibo.Development status and key factors of successful development of shale gas[J].Sino-Global Energy, 2011, 16(7):47-50.
[8] 黄玉珍, 黄金亮, 葛春梅, 等.技术进步是推动美国页岩气快速发展的关键[J].天然气工业, 2009, 29(5):7-10.
Huang Yuzhen, Huang Jinliang, Ge Chunmei, et al.A key factor promoting rapid development of shale gas in America:technical progress[J].Natural Gas Industry, 2009, 29(5):7-10.
[9] 聂海宽, 张金川, 李玉喜.四川盆地及其周缘下寒武统页岩气聚集条件[J].石油学报, 2011, 32(6):959-967.
Nie Haikuan, Zhang Jinchuan, Li Yuxi.Accumulation conditions of the Lower Cambrian shale gas in the Sichuan Basin and its periphery[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2011, 32(6):959-967.
[10] 陈尚斌, 朱炎铭, 王红岩, 等.中国页岩气研究现状与发展趋势[J].石油学报, 2010, 31(4):689-694.
Chen Shangbin, Zhu Yanming, Wang Hongyan, et al.Research status and trends of shale gas in China[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2010, 31(4):689-694.
[11] 邹才能, 朱如凯, 吴松涛, 等.常规与非常规油气聚集类型、特征、机理及展望——以中国致密油和致密气为例[J].石油学报, 2012, 33(2):173-187.
Zou Caineng, Zhu Rukai, Wu Songtao, et al.Types, characteristics, genesis and prospects of conventional and unconventional hydrocarbon accumulations:taking tight oil and tight gas in China as an instance[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2012, 33(2):173-187.
[12] 陈尚斌, 朱炎铭, 王红岩, 等.四川盆地南缘下志留统龙马溪组页岩气储层矿物成分特征及意义[J].石油学报, 2011, 32(5):775-782.
Chen Shangbin, Zhu Yanming, Wang Hongyan, et al.Characteristics and significance of mineral compositions of Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation shale gas reservoir in the southern margin of Sichuan Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2011, 32(5):775-782.
[13] 杨峰, 宁正福, 胡昌蓬, 等.页岩储层微观孔隙结构特征[J].石油学报, 2013, 34(2):301-311.
Yang Feng, Ning Zhengfu, Hu Changpeng, et al.Characterization of microscopic pore structures in shale reservoirs[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2013, 34(2):301-311.
[14] Ross D J K, Bustin R M.Characterizing the shale gas resource potential of Devonian Mississippian strata in the western Canada sedimentary basin:application of an integrated formation evaluation[J].AAPG Bulletin, 2008, 92(1):87-125.
[15] Nelson P H.Pore-throat sizes in sandstones, tight sandstones, and shales[J].AAPG Bulletin, 2009, 93(3):329-340.
[16] 薛华庆, 王红岩, 刘洪林, 等.页岩吸附性能及孔隙结构特征——以四川盆地龙马溪组页岩为例[J].石油学报, 2013, 34(5):`826-832.
Xue Huaqing, Wang Hongyan, Liu Honglin, et al.Adsorption capability and aperture distribution characteristics of shales:taking the Longmaxi Formation shale of Sichuan Basin as an example[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2013, 34(5):826-832.
[17] Clarkson C R, Bustin R M.The effect of pore structure and gas pressure upon the transport properties of coal:a laboratory and modeling study.1.Isotherms and pore volume distributions[J].Fuel, 1999, 78(11):1333-1344.
[18] 田华, 张水昌, 柳少波, 等.压汞法和气体吸附法研究富有机质页岩孔隙特征[J].石油学报, 2012, 33(3):419-427.
Tian Hua, Zhang Shuichang, Liu Shaobo, et al.Determination of organic-rich shale pore features by mercury injection and gas adsorption methods[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2012, 33(3):419-427.
[19] 四川省地质局107地质队.中华人民共和国区域地质调查报告(南川幅)[R].四川省地质局, 1977.
Sichuan Provincial Bureau of Geology One Hundred and Seven Geological Team.The People's Republic of China regional geological survey report (mapsheet of Nanchuan)[R].Sichuan Provincial Bureau of Geology, 1977.
[20] 谢忱, 张金川, 李玉喜, 等.渝东南渝科1井下寒武统富有机质页岩发育特征与含气量[J].石油与天然气地质, 2013, 34(1):11-15.
Xie Chen, Zhang Jinchuan, Li Yuxi, et al.Characteristics and gas content of the Lower Cambrian dark shale in Well Yuke 1, Southeast Chongqing[J].Oil & Gas Geology, 2013, 34(1):11-15.
[21] 董大忠, 程克明, 王玉满, 等.中国上扬子区下古生界页岩气形成条件及特征[J].石油与天然气地质, 2010, 31(3):288-299.
Dong Dazhong, Cheng Keming, Wang Yuman, et al.Forming conditions and characteristics of shale gas in the Lower Paleozoic of the Upper Yangtze region, China[J].Oil & Gas Geology, 2010, 31(3):288-299.
[22] 张金川, 姜生玲, 唐玄, 等.我国页岩气富集类型及资源特点[J].天然气工业, 2009, 29(12):109-114.
Zhang Jinchuan, Jiang Shengling, Tang Xuan, et al.Accumulation types and resources characteristics of shale gas in China[J].Natural Gas Industry, 2009, 29(12):109-114.
[23] 聂海宽, 唐玄, 边瑞康.页岩气成藏控制因素及中国南方页岩气发育有利区预测[J].石油学报, 2009, 30(4):484-491.
Nie Haikuan, Tang Xuan, Bian Ruikang.Controlling factors for shale gas accumulation and prediction of potential development area in shale gas reservoir of South China[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2009, 30(4):484-491.
[24] Mondol N H, Bjrlykke K, Jahren J, et al.Experimental mechanical compaction of clay mineral aggregates-Changes in physical properties of mudstones during burial[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2007, 24(5):289-311.
[25] Cheng A L, Huang W L.Selective adsorption of hydrocarbon gases on clays and organic matter[J].Organic Geochemistry, 2004, 35(4):413-423.
[26] 中国石油天然气总公司.SY/T 6285-1997.中华人民共和国石油天然气行业标准——油气储层评价方法[S].北京:石油工业出版社, 1998.
China National Petroleum Corporation.SY/T 6285-1997.The oil and gas industry standard of the People's Republic of China:Evaluating methods of oil and gas reservoirs[S].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 1998.
[27] Rouquerol J, Avnir D, Fairbridge C W, et al.Recommendations for the characterization of porous solids, International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry[J].Pure Applied Chemistry, 1994, 66(8):1739-1758.
[28] 周中毅, 潘长春.沉积盆地古地温测定方法及其应用[M].广州:广东科技出版社, 1992:1-225.
Zhou Zhongyi, Pan Changchun.Sedimentary basin palaeogeothermal determination method and its application[M].Guangzhou:Guangdong Science and Technology Press, 1992:1-225.
[29] Jarvie D M, Hill R J, Ruble T E, et al.Unconventional shale-gas systems:The Mississippian Barnett Shale of north-central Texas as one model for thermogenic shale-gas assessment[J].AAPG Bulletin, 2007, 91(4):475-499.
[30] Ross D J K, Bustin R M.The importance of shale composition and pore structure upon gas storage potential of shale gas reservoirs[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2009, 26(6):916-927.
[31] 于炳松.页岩气储层的特殊性及其评价思路和内容[J].地学前缘, 2012, 19(3):252-258.
Yu Bingsong.Particularity of shale gas reservoir and its evaluation[J].Earth Science Frontiers, 2012, 19(3):252-258.
[32] 李娟, 于炳松, 张金川, 等.黔北地区下寒武统黑色页岩储层特征及其影响因素[J].石油与天然气地质, 2012, 33(3):364-374.
Li Juan, Yu Bingsong, Zhang Jinchuan, et al.Reservoir characteristics and their influence factors of the Lower Cambrian dark shale in northern Guizhou[J].Oil & Gas Geology, 2012, 33(3):364-374.
[33] 武景淑, 于炳松, 李玉喜.渝东南渝页1井页岩气吸附能力及其主控因素[J].西南石油大学学报:自然科学版, 2012, 34(4):40-48.
Wu Jingshu, Yu Bingsong, Li Yuxi.Adsorption capacity of shale gas and controlling factors from the Well Yuye 1 at the southeast of Chongqing[J].Journal of Southwest Petroleum University:Science & Technology Edition, 2012, 34(4):40-48.
[34] 曾秋楠, 于炳松, 李昱霏.鄂尔多斯盆地东南部延长组页岩储层特征及控制因素[J].特种油气藏, 2013, 20(1):23-26.
Zeng Qiunan, Yu Bingsong, Li Yufei.Reservoir characteristics and their controlling factors of the Yanchang Formation shale in southeast of Ordos Basin[J].Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2013, 20(1):23-26.
[35] 李宁, 王才志, 刘英明, 等.基于Java-NetBeans的第三代测井软件CIFLog[J].石油学报, 2013, 34(1):192-200.
Li Ning, Wang Caizhi, Liu Yingming, et al.CIFLog:the 3rd generation logging software based on Java-NetBeans[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2013, 34(1):192-200.
[36] 李宁.电阻率-孔隙度、电阻率-含油(气)饱和度关系一般形式及其最佳逼近函数类型的确定(Ⅰ)[J].地球物理学报, 1989, 32(5):580-592.
Li Ning.General forms of the resistivity porosity and resistivity-oil (Gas)saturation relations, as well as the determination of their optimum approximation function types(Ⅰ)[J].Acta Geophysica Sinica, 1989, 32(5):580-592.

渝东南下寒武统页岩储层特征及测井评价——以渝科1井和酉科1井为例

Reservoir characteristics and evaluation on logging of the Lower Cambrian gas shale in southeast Chongqing：a case study of Well Yuke 1 and Well Youke 1

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	何文渊, 崔宝文, 张金友, 赵莹, 程心阳, 刘召, 刘鑫, 曾花森. 松辽盆地北部嫩江组中—低成熟页岩油地质特征及勘探突破[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(6): 900-913.
[2]	刘胜男, 朱如凯, 靳军, 张婧雅. 油气运移约束陆相页岩油富集——以准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组为例[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(6): 932-946.
[3]	王鑫, 蒙启安, 白云风, 张金友, 王民, 刘召, 孙先达, 李进步, 许承武, 徐亮, 邓仔晓, 吴艳, 卢双舫. 页岩储集性与含油性的毫米级精细评价及意义——以松辽盆地青山口组一段为例[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(6): 961-975.
[4]	解德录, 赵贤正, 金凤鸣, 蒲秀刚, 韩文中, 时战楠, 张伟, 董雄英. 沧东凹陷深湖亚相纹层状页岩成因及页岩油可动性影响因素[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(5): 804-816.
[5]	熊钰, 郭美娟, 王羚鸿, 吴道铭, 陈美华, 李明秋, 邓波, 张芮, 路俊刚, 曾德铭. 四川盆地侏罗系大安寨段页岩油特征及可动性评价[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(5): 817-843.
[6]	侯连华, 米敬奎, 罗霞, 于志超, 林森虎, 廖凤荣, 庞正炼, 赵忠英. 压力对页岩原位加热产出油气特征的影响——以鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组7段3亚段页岩为例[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(4): 629-641.
[7]	杨勇, 张世明, 吕琦, 杜玉山, 李伟忠, 程紫燕, 吕晶, 刘祖鹏. 中国东部陆相断陷盆地中—低成熟度页岩油立体开发技术——以济阳坳陷古近系沙河街组为例[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(4): 672-682,697.
[8]	何永宏, 李桢, 樊建明, 张超, 张旭泽, 马兵. 鄂尔多斯盆地页岩油开发井网优化技术及实践——以庆城油田为例[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(4): 683-697.
[9]	梁兴, 单长安, 张磊, 罗瑀峰, 蒋立伟, 张介辉, 朱斗星, 舒红林, 李健. 四川盆地渝西地区大安深层页岩气田的勘探发现及成藏条件[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(3): 477-499.
[10]	惠沙沙, 庞雄奇, 谌卓恒, 王琛茜, 施砍园, 胡涛, 胡耀, 李敏, 梅术星, 黎茂稳. 四川盆地海相页岩孔隙类型对孔隙空间贡献定量表征[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(3): 531-547.
[11]	武晓光, 龙腾达, 黄中伟, 高文龙, 李根生, 谢紫霄, 杨芮, 鲁京松, 马金亮. 页岩油多岩性交互储层径向井穿层压裂裂缝扩展特征[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(3): 559-573,585.
[12]	宋兆杰, 邓森, 宋宜磊, 刘勇, 鲜成钢, 张江, 韩啸, 曹胜, 付兰清, 崔焕琦. 大庆油田古龙页岩油-CO₂高压相态及传质规律[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(2): 390-402.
[13]	吴宝成, 吴承美, 谭强, 褚艳杰, 梁成钢, 李文波, 张金风, 陈依伟, 徐田录, 王良哲. 准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷昌吉页岩油成藏条件及勘探开发关键技术[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(2): 437-460.
[14]	李乐, 胡远清, 彭小桂, 王伟, 余浩宇, 崔亚圣. 页岩气藏中硫化氢成因研究进展[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(2): 461-476.
[15]	宋永, 唐勇, 何文军, 龚德瑜, 晏奇, 陈棡, 单祥, 刘超威, 刘刚, 秦志军, 阿布力米提·依明, 尤新才, 任海姣, 白雨, 高岗. 准噶尔盆地油气勘探新领域、新类型及勘探潜力[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(1): 52-68.