油-水相对渗透率曲线优化校正新方法

doi:10.7623/syxb201507011

石油学报 ›› 2015, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (7): 871-875.DOI: 10.7623/syxb201507011

油-水相对渗透率曲线优化校正新方法

胡伟¹, 杨胜来¹, 翟羽佳², 朱光亚³, 万敏⁴, 王伟¹

1. 中国石油大学石油工程教育部重点实验室北京 102249;
2. 中国石油华北油田公司储气库管理地质研究所河北廊坊 065000;
3. 中国石油勘探开发研究院北京 100083;
4. 中国石油华北油田公司第四采油厂河北廊坊 065000

收稿日期:2014-12-03 修回日期:2015-04-07 出版日期:2015-07-25 发布日期:2015-08-06
作者简介:胡伟,男,1988年1月生,2010年获长江大学学士学位,现为中国石油大学(北京)油气田开发工程专业博士研究生,主要从事注气物理模拟和数值模拟方面研究。Email:99122899@qq.com
基金资助:
中国石油天然气股份有限公司"十二五"重大科技专项(11.2011E-2500.X.01)和中国石油勘探开发研究院院级创新项目基金(2012Y-055)资助。

A new optimization and correction method of oil-water phase relative permeability curve

Hu Wei¹, Yang Shenglai¹, Zhai Yujia², Zhu Guangya³, Wan Min⁴, Wang Wei¹

1. Key Laboratory of Petroleum Engineering of the Ministry of Education, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China;
2. Geological Research Institute of Gas Storage Management, PetroChina Huabei Oilfield Company, Hebei Langfang 065000, China;
3. PetroChina Research Institute of Exploration and Development, Beijing 100083, China;
4. The Fourth Oil Production Plant, PetroChina Huabei Oilfield Company, Hebei Langfang 065000, China

Received:2014-12-03 Revised:2015-04-07 Online:2015-07-25 Published:2015-08-06

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

相对渗透率曲线是油藏工程中一项重要基础资料,其中含水饱和度的确定对相对渗透率曲线至关重要。通过改进非稳态法测量相对渗透率曲线的实验装置,在岩心夹持器出口端面的岩心中插入一对连接电阻测量仪的电极,以测量岩心出口端的电阻值;同时,在稳态油-水两相渗流理论的基础上,结合阿尔奇公式对含水饱和度与电阻率关系进行标定;运用标定的阿尔奇公式计算非稳态水驱油岩心末端的含水饱和度。通过对比3种不同方式下(电阻率法、JBN改进法和稳态法)得到的相对渗透率曲线可知:电阻率法校正后的相对渗透率曲线在岩心见水后的水相相对渗透率迅速增大,油相相对渗透率迅速降低,与稳态法测得的相对渗透率曲线基本一致。该方法消除了死体积和计算中迭代误差的影响,使测量的相对渗透率曲线更加客观真实。

关键词: 非稳态法, 相对渗透率曲线, 含水饱和度, 电阻率, 阿尔奇公式

Abstract:

Relative permeability curve is the important basic data for reservoir engineering, and the determination of water saturation is crucial to relative permeability curve. Through improving the experimental devices for measurement of relative permeability curve using non-steady method, a pair of electrodes connecting with resistance measure instrument was inserted in the outlet face of core holder, in order to measure resistance values at the core outlet end. Meanwhile, on the basis of steady oil-water phase percolation theory, the relationship between water saturation and resistivity was calibrated in combination with the Archie formula, so as to calculate the water saturation of core end under non-steady water flooding condition. By comparing the relative permeability curves obtained by three different methods (resistivity method, JBN improvement method, and steady method), it can be obtained that for the relative permeability curve corrected using the resistivity method, the water-phase relative permeability is sharply increased after cores encounter water, while oil-phase relative permeability is declined quickly, basically consistent with the relative permeability curve obtained using the steady method. This method can eliminate the influences from dead volume and iterative errors in the calculation, so that the measured relative permeability curve should be more objective and realistic.

Key words: non-steady method, relative permeability curve, water saturation, resistivity, Archie formula

中图分类号:

TE312

胡伟, 杨胜来, 翟羽佳, 朱光亚, 万敏, 王伟. 油-水相对渗透率曲线优化校正新方法[J]. 石油学报, 2015, 36(7): 871-875.

Hu Wei, Yang Shenglai, Zhai Yujia, Zhu Guangya, Wan Min, Wang Wei. A new optimization and correction method of oil-water phase relative permeability curve[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2015, 36(7): 871-875.

参考文献

[1] 高文君,姚江荣,公学成,等.水驱油田油水相对渗透率曲线研究[J].新疆石油地质,2014,35(5):552-557.
Gao Wenjun,Yao Jiangrong,Gong Xuecheng,et al.Study on oil-water relative permeability curves in water flooding oilfields[J].Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2014,35(5):552-557.
[2] 田子朋,张斌,崔海清,等.黏弹性流体分形多孔介质渗流数学模型及计算方法[J].石油学报,2014,35(1):118-122.
Tian Zipeng,Zhang Bin,Cui Haiqing,et al.Mathematical model and numerical calculation for viscoelastic fluid flow through fractal porous media[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2014,35(1):118-122.
[3] Sigmund P M,McCaffery F.An improved unsteady-state procedure for determining the relative-permeability characteristics of heterogeneous porous media[J].Journal of SPE,1979,19(1):15-28.
[4] Johnson E F,Bossler D P,Naumann V O.Calculation of relative permeability from displacement experiments[J]. Petroleum Transactions,AIME,1959,216:370-372.
[5] Jones S C,Roszelle W O.Graphical techniques for determining relative permeability from displacement experiments[J].Journal of Petroleum Technology,1978,5:807-812.
[6] 李克文.根据动态驱替实验数据计算油水相对渗透率曲线的最优化方法[J].江汉石油学院学报,1989,11(3):45-53.
Li Kewen.An optimistic method for calculating oil-water relative permeability curves from dynamic displace-ment experimental data[J]. Journal of Jianghan Petroleum Institute,1989,11(3):45-53.
[7] Chang Y C,Mohanty K K,Huang D D,et al.The impact of wettability and core-scale heterogeneities on relative permeability[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,1997,18(1/2):1-19.
[8] Papatzacos P,Skjveland S M.Relative permeability from capillary pressure[R].SPE 77540,2002.
[9] 易敏,郭平,孙良田.非稳态法水驱气相对渗透率曲线实验[J].天然气工业,2007,27(10):92-94.
Yi Min,Guo Ping,Sun Liangtian.An experimental study on relative permeability curve for unsteady-state gas displacement by water[J].Natural Gas Industry,2007,27(10):92-94.
[10] Pickup G E,Ringrose P S,Sharif A.Steady-state upscaling:from lamina-scale to full-field model[J].SPE Journal,2000,5(2):208-217.
[11] Archie G E.The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics[J].Transactions of the AIME,1942,146:54-62.
[12] Li Kewen.A new method for calculating two-phase relative permeability from resistivity data in porous media[J].Transport in Porous Media,2008,74(1):21-33.
[13] 王晓冬,郝明强,韩永新.启动压力梯度的含义与应用[J].石油学报,2013,34(1):188-191.
Wang Xiaodong,Hao Mingqiang,Han Yongxin.Implication of the threshold pressure gradient and its application[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2013,34(1):188-191.
[14] 孙建国.阿尔奇(Archie)公式:提出背景与早期争论[J].地球物理学进展,2007,22(2):472-486.
Sun Jianguo.Archie's formula:historical background and earlier debates[J].Progress in Geophysics,2007,22(2):472-486.
[15] 陈玉凤,李栋梁,梁德青,等.南海沉积物天然气水合物饱和度与电阻率的关系[J].石油学报,2013,34(3):507-512.
Chen Yufeng,Li Dongliang,Liang Deqing,et al.Relationship between gas hydrate saturation and resistivity in sediments of the South China Sea[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2013,34(3):507-512.
[16] 林承焰,孙廷彬,董春梅,等.基于单砂体的特高含水期剩余油精细表征[J].石油学报,2013,34(6):1131-1136.
Lin Chengyan,Sun Tingbin,Dong Chunmei,et al.Fine characterization of remaining oil based on a single sand body in the high water cut period[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2013,34(6):1131-1136.
[17] Liu Renjing,Liu Huiqing,Li Xiusheng,et al.Calculation of oil and water relative permeability for extra low permeability reservoir[R].SPE 131388,2010.
[18] McPhee C A,Arthur K G.Relative permeability measurements:an inter-laboratory comparison[R].SPE 28826,1994.
[19] 李克文,罗蔓莉,王建新.JBN方法的改进及相应的计算与绘图软件[J].石油勘探与开发,1994,21(3):99-104.
Li Kewen,Luo Manli,Wang Jianxin.Improvements of JBN method and its software for calculating and plotting[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,1994,21(3):99-104.
[20] Li Kewen,Horne R N.Comparison of methods to calculate relative permeability from capillary pressure in consolidated waterwet porous media[J].Water Resources Research,2006,42(6):64-68.

油-水相对渗透率曲线优化校正新方法

A new optimization and correction method of oil-water phase relative permeability curve

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	唐淑玲, 汤达祯, 杨焦生, 邓泽, 李松, 陈世达, 冯鹏, 黄晨, 李站伟. 鄂尔多斯盆地大宁—吉县区块深部煤储层孔隙结构特征及储气潜力[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(11): 1854-1866,1902.
[2]	韩玉娇, 周灿灿, 李潮流, 俞军, 徐红军. 受原油黏度影响的鄂尔多斯盆地油湿和水湿砂岩导电响应规律[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(6): 829-839,859.
[3]	朱秀川, 胡钦红, 蒙冕模, 张军建, 张涛, 尹娜, 孙小惠, 晁静, 杜玉山, 刘惠民. 页岩储层渗吸过程中水的微观分布及其气测渗透率动态响应特征[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(4): 533-547.
[4]	李潮流, 武宏亮, 李霞, 胡法龙, 田瀚, 黄玉越, 袁超. 倾斜电各向异性地层阵列感应测井数据处理新方法[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(10): 1439-1449.
[5]	高建申, 宋阳, 刘彦萍, 朱凯然, 刘昕. 低电阻率地层基于凹陷电极对的油基泥浆电成像测井四参数计算方法[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(8): 960-968.
[6]	吴俊晨, 范宜仁, 曹军涛, 范卓颖, 王小龙, 吴飞. 基于大尺寸地层模型的砂岩储层油基钻井液侵入模拟[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(11): 1407-1414.
[7]	刘志杰, 范宜仁, 曹军涛, 肖承文, 邓少贵, 葛新民, 蔡德洋, 别康. 基于地应力校正的变胶结指数饱和度计算方法——以库车前陆盆地A井区为例[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(7): 814-823.
[8]	张金成, 单桂栋, 张鑫, 廖兴松, 王爱国, 付友义, 周宝义, 程运甫. 随钻井间电位动态测量技术及其应用[J]. 石油学报, 2016, 37(S2): 71-79.
[9]	李靖, 李相方, 王香增, 李莹莹, 石军太, 冯东, 白艳改, 徐敏. 页岩无机质孔隙含水饱和度分布量化模型[J]. 石油学报, 2016, 37(7): 903-913.
[10]	李潮流, 胡法龙, 侯雨庭, 李霞, 刘学锋, 李长喜. 基于有限元的致密砂岩储层电阻率特性模拟[J]. 石油学报, 2016, 37(6): 787-795.
[11]	蔡军, 张恒荣, 曾少军, 高永德, 程远方. 随钻电磁波电阻率测井联合反演方法及其应用[J]. 石油学报, 2016, 37(3): 371-381.
[12]	陈强, 刘昌岭, 邢兰昌, 胡高伟, 孟庆国, 孙建业, 金学彬. 孔隙水垂向不均匀分布体系中水合物生成过程的电阻率变化[J]. 石油学报, 2016, 37(2): 222-229.
[13]	杨朝蓬, 李星民, 刘尚奇, 高树生, 叶礼友, 刘剑. 苏里格低渗致密气藏阈压效应[J]. 石油学报, 2015, 36(3): 347-354.
[14]	崔传智, 徐建鹏, 王端平, 杨勇, 刘志宏, 黄迎松. 特高含水阶段新型水驱特征曲线[J]. 石油学报, 2015, 36(10): 1267-1271.
[15]	陈玉凤, 李栋梁, 梁德青, 周雪冰, 吴能友. 南海沉积物天然气水合物饱和度与电阻率的关系[J]. 石油学报, 2013, 34(3): 507-512.