基于煤系渗透率各向异性测试的水平井穿层压裂效果模拟

doi:10.7623/syxb201508010

石油学报 ›› 2015, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (8): 988-994.DOI: 10.7623/syxb201508010

基于煤系渗透率各向异性测试的水平井穿层压裂效果模拟

李丹琼¹, 张士诚², 张遂安², 杨立源³, 肖凤朝⁴

1. 中联煤层气有限责任公司北京 100011;
2. 中国石油大学教育部石油工程重点实验室北京 102249;
3. 中国石油集团长城钻探工程有限公司北京 100101;
4. 中国矿业大学地球科学与测绘工程学院北京 100083

出版日期:2015-08-25 发布日期:2015-08-06
作者简介:李丹琼,女,1985年2月生,2007年获河北理工大学学士学位,2014年获中国石油大学(北京)油气田开发工程专业博士学位,现为中联煤层气有限责任公司工程师,主要从事煤层气藏增产改造机理及增产工艺方面的研究工作。Email:feixue_forever@163.com
基金资助:
国家重大科技专项 (2011ZX05042)资助。

Effect simulation of horizontal well fracturing through strata based on coal seam permeability anisotropy test

Li Danqiong¹, Zhang Shicheng², Zhang Suian², Yang Liyuan³, Xiao Fengchao⁴

1. China United Coalbed Methane Corporation, Limited, Beijing 100011, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Petroleum Engineering of the Ministry of Education, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China;
3. CNPC Greatwall Drilling Company, Beijing 100101, China;
4. College of Geoscience and Surveying Engineering, China University of Mining & Technology, Beijing 100083, China

Online:2015-08-25 Published:2015-08-06

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

应用自主研发的真三轴渗透仪,开展了煤样及顶、底板岩样的三轴渗透率测定。基于实验结果,通过有限元三维数值模拟方法,研究了渗透率各向异性对深部煤层顶板水平井穿层压裂裂缝扩展的影响。模拟结果表明:①真三轴渗透仪可以实现三轴差异化应力加载,突破了常规拟三轴渗透仪无法分别加载水平最大主应力和水平最小主应力的瓶颈,可以使实验条件与地层条件更为接近。②高阶无烟煤与顶板粉砂岩的真三轴渗透率测试结果都呈现出明显的各向异性特征。无论是高阶无烟煤,还是顶板粉砂岩,垂直层理方向的渗透率都小于平行层理方向者。对于无烟煤,平行层理方向的渗透率也存在明显差别,垂直端割理方向的渗透率大于垂直面割理方向渗透率值。③考虑渗透率各向异性模型与均质模型相比,压裂模拟过程中,破裂压力和施工压力增高,孔隙压力叠加程度增大;模拟最终时刻的整体裂缝形态更加短宽,且缝高增大。

关键词: 煤层气, 穿层压裂, 真三轴, 渗透率, 各向异性, 裂缝扩展

Abstract:

The independently-developed true-triaxial permeameter was applied to test the triaxial permeabilities of coal samples, roof and floor rock samples. Based on experiment results, finite element 3D numerical simulation method was adopted to study the influences of permeability anisotropy on the horizon-crossing fracturing fracture propagation of horizontal wells at deep coal seam roof. The simulation results have indicated that: (1) The true-triaxial permeameter can realize triaxial differential stress loading, thus breaking through the bottleneck of conventional triaxial permeameter unable to load maximum and minimum primary horizontal stress respectively, and making experimental conditions be more consistent with formation conditions. (2) The true-triaxial permeability test results of high-rank anthracite and roof siltstone present significant anisotropy characteristics. Both permeabilities in the direction perpendicular to beddings are smaller than those in the direction parallel to beddings. For anthracite, significant differences also exist in the permeability in the direction parallel to beddings, while the permeability in cleat direction at vertical end is greater than that on vertical plane. (3) Compared with homogeneous model, failure pressure and operation pressure are increased during the fracturing simulation process of permeability anisotropy model, as well as the superposition degree of pore pressure; the overall fracture morphology is shorter and wider with fracture height increasing at the termination of simulation.

Key words: coalbed methane, fracturing through strata, true triaxial, permeability, anisotropy, fracture propagation

中图分类号:

TE355

李丹琼, 张士诚, 张遂安, 杨立源, 肖凤朝. 基于煤系渗透率各向异性测试的水平井穿层压裂效果模拟[J]. 石油学报, 2015, 36(8): 988-994.

Li Danqiong, Zhang Shicheng, Zhang Suian, Yang Liyuan, Xiao Fengchao. Effect simulation of horizontal well fracturing through strata based on coal seam permeability anisotropy test[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2015, 36(8): 988-994.

参考文献

[1] Laubach S E,Marrett R A,Olson J E,et al.Characteristics and origins of coal cleat:a review[J].International Journal of Coal Geology,1998,35(1/4):175-207.
[2] Karacan C Ö,Okandan E.Fracture/cleat analysis of coals from Zonguldak Basin (northwestern Turkey) relative to the potential of coalbed methane production[J].International Journal of Coal Geology,2000,44(2):109-125.
[3] 张胜利.煤层割理及其在煤层气勘探开发中的意义[J].煤田地质与勘探,1995,23(4):27-30.
Zhang Shengli.Significance of coal cleat in the coalbed methane exploration and development[J].Coal Geology & Exploration,1995,23(4):27-30.
[4] 毕建军,苏现波,韩德馨,等.煤层割理与煤级的关系[J].煤炭学报,2001,26(4):346-349.
Bi Jianjun,Su Xianbo,Han Dexin,et al.The relation between cleat frequency and coal rank[J].Journal of China Coal Society,2001,26(4):346-349.
[5] 刘洪林,王红岩,张建博.煤储层割理评价方法[J].天然气工业,2000,20(4):27-29.
Liu Honglin,Wang Hongyan,Zhang Jianbo.Evaluation method of cleats in coal reservoir bed[J].Natural Gas Industry, 2000,20(4):27-29.
[6] Chaianansutcharit T,Chen H Y,Teufel L W.Impacts of permeability anisotropy and pressure interference on coalbed methane (CBM) production[R].SPE 71069,2001.
[7] Xu Bingxiang,Li Xiangfang,Haghighi M,et al.Optimization of hydraulically fractured well configuration in anisotropic coal-bed methane reservoirs[J].Fuel,2013,107:859-865.
[8] Bumb A C,Mckee C R.Use of a computer model to design optimal wellfields for dewatering coal seams for methane production[R].SPE 12859,1984.
[9] Sung W,Ertekin T.An analysis of field development strategies for methane production from coal seams[R].SPE 16858,1987.
[10] Zulkarnain I.Simulation study of the effect of well spacing,effect of permeability anisotropy,and effect of Palmer and Mansoori model on coalbed methane production[D].Texas:Texas A & M University,2005.
[11] Pashim J C.Stratigraphy and structure of coalbed methane reservoirs in the United States:an overview[J].International Journal of Coal Geology,1998,35(1/4):209-240.
[12] 陈金刚,秦勇,宋全友,等.割理方向与煤层气抽放效果的关系及预测模型[J].中国矿业大学学报,2003.32(3):223-226.
Chen Jingang,Qin Yong,Song Quanyou,et al.Coupling relationship between direction of coalbed cleat and methane drainage effect and its prediction model[J].Journal of China University of Mining & Technology,2003,32(3):223-226.
[13] 任飞,李辛子,张遂安.鄂尔多斯盆地不同割理方向煤岩应力敏感性研究[J].煤炭科学技术,2014,42(11):21-25.
Ren Fei,Li Xinzi,Zhang Suian.Study on coal rock stress sensitivity of different cleat directions in Ordos Basin[J].Coal Science and Technology,2014,42(11):21-25.
[14] Wright C A,Tanigawa J J,Shixin M,et al.Enhanced hydraulic fracture technology for a coal seam reservoir in Central China[C].Procceedings of International Meeting on Petroleum Engineering,November 14-17.Beijing,China,1995:371-383.
[15] Meng Zhaoping,Zhang Jincai,Wang Rui.In-situ stress,pore pressure and stress-dependent permeability in the Southern Qinshui Basin[J].International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences,2011,48(1):122-131.
[16] 李相方,蒲云超,孙长宇,等.煤层气与页岩气吸附/解吸的理论再认识[J].石油学报,2014,35(6):1113-1129.
Li Xiangfang,Pu Yunchao,Sun Changyu,et al.Recognition of absorption /desorption theory in coalbed methane reservoir and shale gas reservoir[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica.2014,35(6):1113-1129.
[17] 李安启,姜海,陈彩虹.我国煤层气井水力压裂的实践及煤层裂缝模型选择分析[J].天然气工业,2004,24(5):91-94.
Li Anqi,Jiang Hai,Chen Caihong.Hydraulic fracturing practice and coal-bed fracture model selecting for coal-bed gas wells in China[J].Natural Gas Industry,2004,24(5):91-94.
[18] 单学军,张士诚,李安启,等.煤层气井压裂裂缝扩展规律分析[J].天然气工业,2005,25(1):130-132.
Shan Xuejun,Zhang Shicheng,Li Anqi,et al.Analyzing the fracture extended law of hydraulic fracturing in coalbed gas wells[J].Natural Gas Industry,2005,25(1):130-132.
[19] 李林地,张士诚,庚勐.煤层气藏水力裂缝扩展规律[J].天然气工业,2010,30(2):72-74.
Li Lindi,Zhang Shicheng,Geng Meng.A study of the propagation law of hydraulic fractures in coalbed gas reservoirs[J].Natural Gas Industry,2010,30(2):72-74.
[20] Zhang Jingchen.Numerical simulation of hydraulic fracturing coalbed methane reservoir[J].Fuel, 2014,136:57-61.
[21] 秦勇,袁亮,程远平,等.中国煤层气地面井中长期生产规模的情景预测[J].石油学报,2013,34(3):489-495.
QinYong,Yuan Liang,Cheng Yuanping,et al.Scenario predication for the mid-term and long-term coalbed methane production scale of surface drilling wells in China[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica.2013,34(3):489-495.
[22] 王赶耀,丰庆泰,李平.沿煤层顶板水平井分段压裂煤层气开采技术研究[J].山西大同大学学报:自然科学版,2013,29(4):68-70.
Wang Ganyao,Feng Qingtai,Li Ping.Research on mining technology of coalbed gas through staged fracturing horizontal well along the roof of coal seam[J].Journal of Shanxi Datong University:Natural Science Edition,2013,29(4):68-70.
[23] Simonson E R,Abou-Sayed A S,Clifton R J.Containment of massive hydraulic fractures[J].Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal,1978,18(1):27-32.
[24] Hanson M E,Anderson G D,Schaffer R I,et al.LLL gas stimulation program,quarterly progress report,April through June 1978[R].Report UCRL-50036-78-2,Livemlore,CA:Lawrence Livermore Laboratory,1978.
[25] Hanson M E,Anderson G D,Shaffer R J,et al.Theoretical and experimental research on hydraulic fracturing[J].Journal of Energy Resources Technology,1980,102(2):92-98.
[26] Fung R L,Vilayakumar S,Cormack D E.Calculation of vertical fracture containment in layered formations[R] .SPE 14707,1978.
[27] Smith M B,Bale A B,Britt L K,et al.Layered modulus effects on fracture propagation,proppant placement,and fracture modeling[R].SPE 71654,2001.
[28] Zhang Shike,Yin Shunde.Determination of in situ stresses and elastic parameters from hydraulic fracturing tests by geomechanics modeling and soft computing[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,2014,124:484-492.
[29] Daneshy A A.Hydraulic fracture propagation in layered formations[J].Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal,1978,18(1):33-41.
[30] Anderson G D.Effects of friction on hydraulic fracture growth near unbonded interfaces in rocks[J].Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal,1981,21(1):21-29.
[31] Teufel L W,Clark J A.Hydraulic fracture propagation in layered rock:experimental studies of fracture containment[J].Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal,1984,24(1):19-32.
[32] Abass H H,van Domelen M L,Rabaa W M.Experimental observations of hydraulic fracture propagation through coal blocks[R].SPE 21289,1990.
[33] Thiercelin M,Jeffrey R G,Naceur K B.Influence of fracture toughness on the geometry of hydraulic fractures[J]. Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal,1989,4(4):435-442.
[34] Zuo Jianping,Wang Zhaofeng,Zhou Hongwei,et al.Failure behavior of a rock-coal-rock combined body with a weak coal interlayer[J].International Journal of Mining Science and Technology,2013,23(6):907-912.
[35] Hsiao C,Rabaa E,Wadood A.Fracture toughness testing of rock cores[C].Procceedings of The 28th US Symposium on Rock Mechanics (USRMS),Tucson,Arizona,29 June-1 July[C].Rotterolam:American Rock Mechanics Association,1987.
[36] Rahim Z,Holditch S A.The effects of mechanical properties and selection of completion interval upon the created and propped fracture dimensions in layered reservoirs[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,1995,13(1):29-45.
[37] 贺甲元,李凤霞,黄志文,等.裸眼水平井压裂裂缝高度确定方法[J].科学技术与工程,2013,13(30):9029-9031.
He Jiayuan,Li Fengxia,Huang Zhiwen,et al.The determination for fracturing fracture height of open hole horizontal well[J].Science Technology and Engineering,2013,13(30):9029-9031.
[38] Wang H,Liao X,Ding H.Monitoring and evaluating the volume fracturing effect of horizontal well[J].Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering,2015,22:498-502.
[39] 张遂安,叶建平,李丹琼,等.用于三维渗透率测定的岩样密封结构:中国,ZL 2011 1 0432388.9[P].2012-06-27.
Zhang Suian,Ye Jianping,Li Danqiong,et al.Rock specimen seal structure used for three-dimensional permeability determination:China,ZL 2011 1 0432388.9[P].2012-06-27.
[40] 唐书恒,汤达祯,杨起.二元气体等温吸附-解吸中气分的变化规律[J].中国矿业大学学报,2004,33(4):448-452.
Tang Shuheng,Tang Dazhen,Yang Qi.Variation regularity of gas component concentration in binary-component gas adsorption-desorption isotherm experiments[J].Journal of China University of Mining & Technology,2004,33(4):448-452.
[41] 李丹琼,张士诚,张遂安.煤层气井牛顿流体压裂压力损失预测模型[J].煤田地质与勘探,2013,41(4):22-25.
Li Danqiong,Zhang Shicheng,Zhang Suian.Pressure loss prediction model of Newtonian fluid hydraulic fracturing in coalbed methane well[J].Coal Geology & Exploration,2013,41(4):22-25.
[42] Zhang G M,Liu H,Zhang J,et al.Three-dimensional finite element simulation and parametric study for horizontal well hydraulic fracture[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,2010,72(3/4):310-317.

基于煤系渗透率各向异性测试的水平井穿层压裂效果模拟

Effect simulation of horizontal well fracturing through strata based on coal seam permeability anisotropy test

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张群, 孙四清, 降文萍. 碎软低渗煤层煤矿区煤层气勘探开发关键技术及发展方向[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(5): 855-865.
[2]	郭晨, 李瑞腾, 秦勇, 卢玲玲, 易同生, 陈贞龙, 袁航, 高为, 程曦. 煤层气井产出水演化路径及产量判识意义——以黔西地区织金区块为例[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(3): 517-530.
[3]	武晓光, 龙腾达, 黄中伟, 高文龙, 李根生, 谢紫霄, 杨芮, 鲁京松, 马金亮. 页岩油多岩性交互储层径向井穿层压裂裂缝扩展特征[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(3): 559-573,585.
[4]	宋永, 唐勇, 何文军, 龚德瑜, 晏奇, 陈棡, 单祥, 刘超威, 刘刚, 秦志军, 阿布力米提·依明, 尤新才, 任海姣, 白雨, 高岗. 准噶尔盆地油气勘探新领域、新类型及勘探潜力[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(1): 52-68.
[5]	李志军, 肖阳, 田建章, 李晓燕, 王元杰, 王海燕, 焦亚先, 汤小琪, 贾颖超, 任春玲, 严梦颖, 王成云, 任艺. 渤海湾盆地冀中坳陷新领域、新类型油气勘探潜力及有利方向[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(1): 69-98.
[6]	魏迎春, 孟涛, 张劲, 王安民, 王亚东. 不同煤体结构煤储层与煤层气井产出煤粉特征的关系——以鄂尔多斯盆地东缘柳林区块为例[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(6): 1000-1014.
[7]	王瀚, 苏玉亮, 王文东, 李冠群, 张琪. 基于格子Boltzmann方法的页岩纳米多孔介质流体流动模拟[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(3): 534-544.
[8]	沈华, 杨亮, 韩昊天, 王颖, 邢济麟, 薛松, 刘红超. 松辽盆地南部油气勘探新领域、新类型及资源潜力[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(12): 2104-2121.
[9]	刘惠民, 高阳, 秦峰, 杨怀宇. 渤海湾盆地济阳坳陷油气勘探新领域、新类型及资源潜力[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(12): 2141-2159.
[10]	周立宏, 陈长伟, 崔宇, 杨飞, 刘国全, 李宏军, 邹磊落, 王文庆, 周凤春. 渤海湾盆地黄骅坳陷油气勘探新领域、新类型及资源潜力[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(12): 2160-2178.
[11]	罗平亚, 朱苏阳. 中国建立千亿立方米级煤层气大产业的理论与技术基础[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(11): 1755-1763.
[12]	徐凤银, 王成旺, 熊先钺, 徐博瑞, 王红娜, 赵欣, 江山, 宋伟, 王玉斌, 陈高杰, 吴鹏, 赵靖舟. 鄂尔多斯盆地东缘深部煤层气成藏演化规律与勘探开发实践[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(11): 1764-1780.
[13]	康永尚, 闫霞, 皇甫玉慧, 张兵, 邓泽. 深部超饱和煤层气藏概念及主要特点[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(11): 1781-1790.
[14]	秦勇. 中国深部煤层气地质研究进展[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(11): 1791-1811.
[15]	熊先钺, 闫霞, 徐凤银, 李曙光, 聂志宏, 冯延青, 刘莹, 陈明, 孙俊义, 周科, 李春虎. 深部煤层气多要素耦合控制机理、解吸规律与开发效果剖析[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(11): 1812-1826,1853.