煤层气直井地层破裂压力计算模型

doi:10.7623/syxb201805009

石油学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (5): 578-586.DOI: 10.7623/syxb201805009

煤层气直井地层破裂压力计算模型

杨兆中¹, 刘云锐¹, 张平², 李小刚¹, 易良平¹

1. 西南石油大学油气藏地质及开发工程国家重点实验室四川成都 610500;
2. 中联煤层气有限责任公司北京 100011

收稿日期:2017-07-03 修回日期:2018-02-19 出版日期:2018-05-25 发布日期:2018-06-06
通讯作者: 刘云锐,男,1995年1月生,2016年获西南石油大学学士学位,现为西南石油大学硕士研究生,主要从事低渗透油气藏增产改造研究。Email:765746862@qq.com
作者简介:杨兆中,男,1969年5月生,1990年获西南石油学院学士学位,1996年获西南石油学院博士学位,现为西南石油大学教授、博士生导师,主要从事低渗透油气藏增产改造理论、技术与油气藏数值模拟研究。Email:yzzycl@vip.sina.com
基金资助:
国家科技重大专项（2016ZX05044-004-002）资助。

A model for calculating formation breakdown pressure in CBM vertical wells

Yang Zhaozhong¹, Liu Yunrui¹, Zhang Ping², Li Xiaogang¹, Yi Liangping¹

1. State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Southwest Petroleum University, Sichuan Chengdu 610500, China;
2. China United Coalbed Methane Co., Ltd., Beijing 100011, China

Received:2017-07-03 Revised:2018-02-19 Online:2018-05-25 Published:2018-06-06

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为了高效开发煤层气、成功实施水力压裂作业，针对射孔完井条件下，对水力压裂时煤层的破裂压力进行预测。提出将套管、水泥环的影响纳入到井筒周围应力场计算中，运用坐标转换和线性叠加原理，建立了考虑套管、水泥环影响的煤层直井井周应力场解析模型。结合最大拉应力、张性破坏、剪切破坏3种破裂准则，建立了考虑套管、水泥环影响的煤层气直井破裂压力预测模型，分析了射孔径向深度、割理走向倾角、地应力差对破裂压力的影响。以云南地区X井为例，模型计算结果误差在7%以内，证明了该模型的正确性。研究结果表明：套管、水泥环会引起应力集中效应，使得破裂压力降低；在最大水平主应力方向射孔时，煤层更容易本体破裂；射孔周向角在一定区间时，本体破裂和割理张性破裂同时发生；中等割理走向倾角有较低的张性破裂压力，地应力差较小时，不易发生剪切破裂。

关键词: 破裂压力, 水泥环, 套管, 井周应力场, 煤层气

Abstract:

To effectively develop coalbed methane and ensure successful hydraulic fracturing operation, the breakdown pressure of coal formation under hydraulic fracturing is predicted under the condition of perforated completion. The influence of casing and cement sheath is considered in the calculation of stress field around the wellbore. Based on the principle of coordinate transformation and linear superposition, an analytical model of stress field around the vertical well of coal seam is established considering the influence of casing and cement sheath. In combination with three kinds of breakdown criteria, i.e., maximum tension stress, tension fracture and shear fracture, a breakdown pressure prediction model of coal-seam vertical well is established considering the influence of casing and cement sheath. In this study, the influences of perforation radial depth, cleat striking angle and geo-stress difference on breakdown pressure are analyzed. Taking a well in Yunnan province an example, the calculation error is less than 7%, which proves the correctness of this model. The results show that the casing and cement sheath can cause the stress concentration effect and reduce breakdown pressure. In the case of perforation in the direction of maximum horizontal principal stress, the coal seam itself is more likely to be cracked. In the case of perforation circumferential angle in a certain interval, the coal seam fracture and cleat tensile fracture are simultaneous. When the medium cleat strike angle has a lower tensile breakdown pressure with less geo-stress, shear fracture is not prone to occur.

Key words: breakdown pressure, cement sheath, casing, well surrounding stress field, coal bed methane

中图分类号:

TE357

杨兆中, 刘云锐, 张平, 李小刚, 易良平. 煤层气直井地层破裂压力计算模型[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(5): 578-586.

Yang Zhaozhong, Liu Yunrui, Zhang Ping, Li Xiaogang, Yi Liangping. A model for calculating formation breakdown pressure in CBM vertical wells[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2018, 39(5): 578-586.

参考文献

[1] 秦勇,申建.论深部煤层气基本地质问题[J].石油学报,2016,37(1):125-136.
QIN Yong,SHEN Jian.On the fundamental issues of deep coalbed methane geology[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2016,37(1):125-136.
[2] HUBBERT M K,WILLIS D G.Mechanics of hydraulic fracturing[J].Petroleum Transactions.AIME,1957,210:153-168.
[3] HAIMSON B,FAIRHURST C.Initiation and extension of hydraulic fractures in rocks[J].Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal,1967,7(3):310-318.
[4] 黄荣樽.地层破裂压力预测模式的探讨[J].华东石油学院学报,1984(4):335-347.
HUANG Rongzun.A model for predicting formation fracture pressure[J].Journal of East China Petroleum Institute,1984(4):335-347.
[5] 陈勉,陈治喜,黄荣樽.大斜度井水压裂缝起裂研究[J].石油大学学报:自然科学版,1995,19(2):30-35.
CHEN Mian,CHEN Zhixi,HUANG Rongzun.Hydraulic fracturing of hiohly deviated wells[J].Journal of the University of Petroleum,China:Edition of Natural Science,1995,19(2):30-35.
[6] 李传亮,孔祥言.油井压裂过程中岩石破裂压力计算公式的理论研究[J].石油钻采工艺,2000,22(2):54-56.
LI Chuanliang,KONG Xiangyan.A theoretical study on rock breakdown pressure calculation equations of fracturing process[J].Oil Drilling & Production Technology,2000,22(2):54-56.
[7] 练章华,张先普,赵国珍,等.岩石、水泥环、套管互作用的粘弹塑性有限元力学模型[J].西南石油学院学报,1994,16(2):97-103.
LIAN Zhanghua,ZHANG Xianpu,ZHAO Guozhen,et al.Viscoelastic-plastic finite element mechanics models of interaction of rock,cement ring and casing[J].Journal of Southwest Petroleum Institute,1994,16(2):97-103.
[8] 邓金根,王康平,黄荣樽,等.油井套管、水泥环组合体抗非均匀围岩外载的强度特性[J].岩石力学与工程学报,1994,13(2):160-167.
DENG Jin'gen,WANG Kangping,HUANG Rongzun,et al.Collapse resistance of oil well casing-cement mantle combinatiton subjectedto non-uniform loading by rock creep[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,1994,13(2):160-167.
[9] 李军,陈勉,柳贡慧,等.套管、水泥环及井壁围岩组合体的弹塑性分析[J].石油学报,2005,26(6):99-103.
LI Jun,CHEN Mian,LIU Gonghui,et al.Elastic-plastic analysis of casing-concrete sheath-rock combination[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2005,26(6):99-103.
[10] 李勇,刘硕琼,王兆会.水泥环厚度及力学参数对其应力的影响[J].石油钻采工艺,2010,32(4):37-40.
LI Yong,LIU Shuoqiong,WANG Zhaohui.Effect of cement thickness and its mechanical parameters on cement stress[J].Oil Drilling & Production Technology,2010,32(4):37-40.
[11] 刘奎,王宴滨,高德利,等.页岩气水平井压裂对井筒完整性的影响[J].石油学报,2016,37(3):406-414.
LIU Kui,WANG Yanbin,GAO Deli,et al.Effects of hydraulic fracturing on horizontal wellbore for shale gas[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2016,37(3):406-414.
[12] 马天寿,陈平,王旭东,等.页岩气储层井周孔隙压力传递数值分析方法[J].石油学报,2016,37(5):660-671.
MA Tianshou,CHEN Ping,WANG Xudong,et al.Numerical analysis method of pore pressure propagation around the borehole for shale gas reservoirs[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2016,37(5):660-671.
[13] 李勇,陈瑶,靳建洲,等.页岩气井体积压裂条件下的水泥环界面裂缝扩展[J].石油学报,2017,38(1):105-111.
LI Yong,CHEN Yao,JIN Jianzhou,et al.Cement ring interface crack propagation under volume fracturing in shale gas well[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2017,38(1):105-111.
[14] 李玉伟,艾池.煤层气直井水力压裂裂缝起裂模型研究[J].石油钻探技术,2015,43(4):83-90.
LI Yuwei,AI Chi.Hydraulic fracturing fracture initiation model for a vertical CBM well[J].Petroleum Drilling Techniques,2015,43(4):83-90.
[15] 张广清,陈勉,殷有泉,等.射孔对地层破裂压力的影响研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2003,22(1):40-44.
ZHANG Guangqing,CHEN Mian,YIN Youquan,et al.Study on influence of perforation on formation fracturing pressure[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2003,22(1):40-44.
[16] 姜浒,陈勉,张广清,等.定向射孔对水力裂缝起裂与延伸的影响[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2009,28(7):1321-1326.
JIANG Hu,CHEN Mian,ZHANG Guangqing,et al.Impact of oriented perforation on hydraulic fracture initiation and propagation[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2009,28(7):1321-1326.
[17] 刘翔.垂直射孔井地应力及破裂压力研究[J].钻采工艺,2008,31(2):36-38.
LIU Xiang.Study on earth stress and fracturing pressure in vertical perforated wells[J].Drilling & Production Technology,2008,31(2):36-38.
[18] 朱海燕,邓金根,刘书杰,等.定向射孔水力压裂起裂压力的预测模型[J].石油学报,2013,34(3):556-562.
ZHU Haiyan,DENG Jin'gen,LIU Shujie,et al.A prediction model for the hydraulic fracture initiation pressure in oriented perforation[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2013,34(3):556-562.
[19] 殷有泉,蔡永恩,陈朝伟,等.非均匀地应力场中套管载荷的理论解[J].石油学报,2006,27(4):133-138.
YIN Youquan,CAI Yong'en,CHEN Zhaowei,et al.Theoretical solution of casing loading in non-uniform ground stress field[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2006,27(4):133-138.
[20] 王光钦.弹性力学[M].北京:中国铁道出版社,2008.
WANG Guangqin.Elastic mechanics[M].Beijing:China Railway Publishing House,2008.
[21] 王敏中,王炜,武际可.弹性力学教程[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2002:261-265.
WANG Minzhong,WANG Wei,WU Jike.Elastic mechanics tutorial[M].Beijing:Peking University Press,2002:261-265.
[22] 路艳军.煤层气储层水力压裂裂缝破裂与延伸机理研究[D].成都:西南石油大学,2012.
LU Yanjun.Coalbed methane reservoir hydraulic fracturing cracks crack and extension mechanism[D].Chengdu:Southwest Petroleum University,2012.
[23] 程亮,卢义玉,葛兆龙,等.倾斜煤层水力压裂起裂压力计算模型及判断准则[J].岩土力学,2015,36(2):444-450.
CHENG Liang,LU Yiyu,GE Zhaolong,et al.Initiation pressure calculation model and judgment criterion for hydraulic fracturing of inclined coal seam[J].Rock and Soil Mechanics,2015,36(2):444-450.
[24] 赵金洲,任岚,胡永全,等.裂缝性地层水力裂缝张性起裂压力分析[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2013,32(增刊1):2855-2862.
ZHAO Jinzhou,REN Lan,HU Yongquan,et al.Hydraulic fracture tensile initiation pressure analysis for fractured formations[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2013,32(S1):2855-2862.

煤层气直井地层破裂压力计算模型

A model for calculating formation breakdown pressure in CBM vertical wells

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张群, 孙四清, 降文萍. 碎软低渗煤层煤矿区煤层气勘探开发关键技术及发展方向[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(5): 855-865.
[2]	郭晨, 李瑞腾, 秦勇, 卢玲玲, 易同生, 陈贞龙, 袁航, 高为, 程曦. 煤层气井产出水演化路径及产量判识意义——以黔西地区织金区块为例[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(3): 517-530.
[3]	宋永, 唐勇, 何文军, 龚德瑜, 晏奇, 陈棡, 单祥, 刘超威, 刘刚, 秦志军, 阿布力米提·依明, 尤新才, 任海姣, 白雨, 高岗. 准噶尔盆地油气勘探新领域、新类型及勘探潜力[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(1): 52-68.
[4]	李志军, 肖阳, 田建章, 李晓燕, 王元杰, 王海燕, 焦亚先, 汤小琪, 贾颖超, 任春玲, 严梦颖, 王成云, 任艺. 渤海湾盆地冀中坳陷新领域、新类型油气勘探潜力及有利方向[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(1): 69-98.
[5]	魏迎春, 孟涛, 张劲, 王安民, 王亚东. 不同煤体结构煤储层与煤层气井产出煤粉特征的关系——以鄂尔多斯盆地东缘柳林区块为例[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(6): 1000-1014.
[6]	沈华, 杨亮, 韩昊天, 王颖, 邢济麟, 薛松, 刘红超. 松辽盆地南部油气勘探新领域、新类型及资源潜力[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(12): 2104-2121.
[7]	刘惠民, 高阳, 秦峰, 杨怀宇. 渤海湾盆地济阳坳陷油气勘探新领域、新类型及资源潜力[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(12): 2141-2159.
[8]	周立宏, 陈长伟, 崔宇, 杨飞, 刘国全, 李宏军, 邹磊落, 王文庆, 周凤春. 渤海湾盆地黄骅坳陷油气勘探新领域、新类型及资源潜力[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(12): 2160-2178.
[9]	罗平亚, 朱苏阳. 中国建立千亿立方米级煤层气大产业的理论与技术基础[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(11): 1755-1763.
[10]	徐凤银, 王成旺, 熊先钺, 徐博瑞, 王红娜, 赵欣, 江山, 宋伟, 王玉斌, 陈高杰, 吴鹏, 赵靖舟. 鄂尔多斯盆地东缘深部煤层气成藏演化规律与勘探开发实践[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(11): 1764-1780.
[11]	康永尚, 闫霞, 皇甫玉慧, 张兵, 邓泽. 深部超饱和煤层气藏概念及主要特点[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(11): 1781-1790.
[12]	秦勇. 中国深部煤层气地质研究进展[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(11): 1791-1811.
[13]	熊先钺, 闫霞, 徐凤银, 李曙光, 聂志宏, 冯延青, 刘莹, 陈明, 孙俊义, 周科, 李春虎. 深部煤层气多要素耦合控制机理、解吸规律与开发效果剖析[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(11): 1812-1826,1853.
[14]	刘建忠, 朱光辉, 刘彦成, 晁巍巍, 杜佳, 杨琦, 米洪刚, 张守仁. 鄂尔多斯盆地东缘深部煤层气勘探突破及未来面临的挑战与对策——以临兴—神府区块为例[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(11): 1827-1839.
[15]	桑树勋, 郑司建, 王建国, 周效志, 刘世奇, 韩思杰, 赵伟光, 黄华州, 王冉, 汪吉林, 张志镇, 赵立明, 潘冬明, 陈同俊. 岩石力学地层新方法在深部煤层气勘探开发“甜点”预测中的应用[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(11): 1840-1853.