特低渗透砂岩油层钻井液侵入程度及影响

doi:10.7623/syxb201909007

石油学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (9): 1095-1103.DOI: 10.7623/syxb201909007

特低渗透砂岩油层钻井液侵入程度及影响

王建民, 张三

西安石油大学地球科学与工程学院陕西西安 710065

收稿日期:2018-09-10 修回日期:2019-02-20 出版日期:2019-09-25 发布日期:2019-10-15
通讯作者: 王建民,男,1962年6月生,1983年获成都地质学院学士学位,2011年获西北大学博士学位,现为西安石油大学教授、硕士生导师,主要从事沉积、储层、油气成藏及开发地质等方面的教学与科研工作。Email:wangjm@xsyu.edu.cn
作者简介:王建民,男,1962年6月生,1983年获成都地质学院学士学位,2011年获西北大学博士学位,现为西安石油大学教授、硕士生导师,主要从事沉积、储层、油气成藏及开发地质等方面的教学与科研工作。Email:wangjm@xsyu.edu.cn
基金资助:
陕西省自然科学基金项目（2010JM5003）和西安石油大学青年科技创新基金项目（2012BS010）资助。

Drilling fluid invasion degree and its impact evaluation in ultra-low permeability sandstone reservoir

Wang Jianmin, Zhang San

School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Xi'an Shiyou University, Shaanxi Xi'an 710065, China

Received:2018-09-10 Revised:2019-02-20 Online:2019-09-25 Published:2019-10-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

根据地质录井、实验分析、压裂试采等资料，基于动态分析、渗流理论及物质平衡原理，动、静态分析相结合，对特低渗透砂岩油层钻井液（泥浆滤液）侵入程度及其影响的评价方法进行了研究。利用压裂试采曲线特征将特低渗透油层的生产动态划分为初产与稳产2个阶段：1初产阶段主要表现为大量外来流体沿人工及天然裂缝系统的快速返排，产水量及含水率变化迅猛；2稳产阶段主要表现为地层原始流体在饱和度控制下的相对渗流，产水量及含水率变化处于低稳状态。正常油层具孔隙型单孔介质，通常无明显的钻井液侵入，其初产阶段的地层吞吐水量大致相当。低阻油层具微裂缝-孔隙型双孔介质，具有显著的钻井液侵入特征，其初产阶段的地层吞吐水量差异大致等于钻井液的侵入体积。利用地层初始吞吐液量差异确定了特低渗透砂岩油层的钻井液侵入程度，并以地层吞吐液量、钻井液侵入深度、结合压裂曲线特征，量化判断油层属性。建立了油层电阻率与钻井液侵入深度关系图版，定量评价了钻井液侵入的影响，分析了低阻油层成因。结果表明，钻井液侵入深度越大，则油层电阻率越小，低阻油层是钻井液超深侵入的结果；由于双孔介质及其微裂缝的发育，低阻油层的钻井液侵入深度通常超过了感应系列的径向探测半径，因此导致了"低阻"的发生。

关键词: 特低渗透油层, 生产动态, 地层吞吐液量, 钻井液侵入程度, 低阻油层成因

Abstract:

Based on geological logging, experimental analysis, fracturing and test mining, etc., in combination with dynamic analysis, seepage theory and material balance principle, as well as dynamic and static analyses, this study explores the invasion degree of drilling fluid (mud filtrate) in ultra-low permeability sandstone reservoirs and the evaluation method of its impact. The production dynamics of ultra-low permeability reservoirs are divided into two stages, i.e., initial production and stable production, by using the characteristics of fracturing pilot production curves. The initial production stage is mainly characterized with the rapid return flow of massive external fluids along artificial and natural fracture systems, and a rapid change in water production and water content. The stable production stage is mainly characterized by the relative seepage of the original layer fluid under saturation control, and the change of water production and water content in a low-stability state; the normal oil layer has a single-porous medium, there is usually no obvious drilling fluid invasion; the amount of water invaded is roughly equal to the amount produced by the formation in the initial production stage. The low-resistance oil layer has a micro-crack-porosity dual-porous medium, showing significant drilling fluid invasion, and the difference in formation water throughput at the initial production stage is approximately equal to the invasion volume of drilling fluid. The invasion degree of drilling fluid in the ultra-low permeability sandstone reservoir is determined by the difference in the initial formation fluid throughput. Meanwhile, the properties of the reservoir are quantified by formation fluid throughput, the invasion depth of drilling fluid and the characteristics of fracturing curve. A map of oil layer resistivity and drilling fluid invasion depth is established to quantitatively evaluate the influence of drilling fluid invasion and analyze the genesis of low-resistivity oil layer. The results show that the deeper the invasion depth of drilling fluid is, the smaller the resistivity of oil layer will be. The low-resistance oil layer is the result of the ultra-deep invasion of drilling fluid. Due to the development of the dual-porous medium and its micro-cracks, the drilling fluid invasion depth of the low-resistance oil layer often exceeds the radial detection radius of the sensing series, thus leading to the occurrence of low resistance.

Key words: ultra-low permeability oil layer, production dynamics, formation fluid throughput, drilling fluid invasion degree, genesis of low-resistance oil layer

中图分类号:

TE311

王建民, 张三. 特低渗透砂岩油层钻井液侵入程度及影响[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(9): 1095-1103.

Wang Jianmin, Zhang San. Drilling fluid invasion degree and its impact evaluation in ultra-low permeability sandstone reservoir[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2019, 40(9): 1095-1103.

参考文献

[1] 罗晓容,王忠楠,雷裕红,等.特超低渗砂岩油藏储层非均质性特征与成藏模式——以鄂尔多斯盆地西部延长组下组合为例[J].石油学报,2016,37(增刊1):87-98.
LUO Xiaorong,WANG Zhongnan,LEI Yuhong,et al.Heterogeneity characteristics and accumulation model of ultra-low permeability sandstone reservoirs:a case study of the lower part of Yanchang Formation in the western Ordos Basin,China[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2016,37(S1):87-98.
[2] 王瑞飞,陈明强,孙卫.鄂尔多斯盆地延长组超低渗透砂岩储层微观孔隙结构特征研究[J].地质论评,2008,54(2):270-277.
WANG Ruifei,CHEN Mingqiang,SUN Wei.The research of micro-pore structure in super-low permeability sandstone reservoir of the Yanchang Formation in Ordos Basin[J].Geological Review,2008,54(2):270-277.
[3] 吴浩,张春林,纪友亮,等.致密砂岩孔喉大小表征及对储层物性的控制——以鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区延长组为例[J].石油学报,2017,38(8):876-887.
WU Hao,ZHANG Chunlin,JI Youliang,et al.Pore-throat size characterization of tight sandstone and its control on reservoir physical properties:a case study of Yanchang Formation,eastern Gansu,Ordos Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2017,38(8):876-887.
[4] 樊建明,屈雪峰,王冲,等.鄂尔多斯盆地致密储集层天然裂缝分布特征及有效裂缝预测新方法[J].石油勘探与开发,2016,43(5):740-748.
FAN Jianming,QU Xuefeng,WANG Chong,et al.Natural fracture distribution and a new method predicting effective fractures in tight oil reservoirs of Ordos Basin[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2016,43(5):740-748.
[5] 张小莉.陕北三叠系延长组低阻油层特性及其形成机理分析[J].测井技术,1999,23(4):276-278.
ZHANG Xiaoli.Characteristics of low resistivity oil reservoir in Yanchang Formation Shanbei Triassic system and its origin[J].Well Logging Technology,1999,23(4):276-278.
[6] 中国石油勘探与生产公司.低阻油气藏测井识别评价方法与技术[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2006.
China Petroleum Exploration and Production Company.Low resistivity reservoir logging identification evaluation method and technology[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2006.
[7] 杨春梅,周灿灿,程相志.低电阻率油层成因机理分析及有利区预测[J].石油勘探与开发,2008,35(5):600-605.
YANG Chunmei,ZHOU Cancan,CHENG Xiangzhi.Origin of low resistivity pays and forecasting of favorable prospecting areas[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2008,35(5):600-605.
[8] 穆龙新,田中元,赵丽敏.A油田低电阻率油层的机理研究[J].石油学报,2004,25(2):69-73.
MU Longxin,TIAN Zhongyuan,ZHAO Limin.Investigation on mechanism of low-resistivity formation of A oilfield[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2004,25(2):69-73.
[9] KARPOV I,MAKAROV A,ELTSOV I,et al.Oil viscosity impact on invasion zone structure and resistivity measurements[R].SPE 171213,2014.
[10] GAI Shaohua,LIU Huiqing,HE Shunli,et al.Reinterpreting the low-resistivity reservoir by using new logging model:a case study from a block in Sulige tight gas field[R].SPE 172823,2015.
[11] LING Kegang,ZHANG He,SHEN Zheng,et al.A new approach to estimate invasion radius of water-based-drilling-fluid filtrate to evaluate formation damage caused by overbalanced drilling[R].SPE 168184,2014.
[12] EZEAKACHA C P,SALEHI S,GHALAMBOR A,et al.Investigating impact of rock type and lithology on mud invasion and formation damage[R].SPE 189471,2018.
[13] 郝明强,刘先贵,胡永乐,等.微裂缝性特低渗透油藏储层特征研究[J].石油学报,2007,28(5):93-98.
HAO Mingqiang,LIU Xiangui,HU Yongle,et al.Reservoir characteristics of micro-fractured ultra-low permeability reservoirs[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2007,28(5):93-98.
[14] 南珺祥,王素荣,姚卫华,等.鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区延长组长6-8特低渗透储层微裂缝研究[J].岩性油气藏,2007,19(4):40-44.
NAN Junxiang,WANG Surong,YAO Weihua,et al.Micro-fractures in extra-low permeability reservoir of Yanchang Formation in Ordos Basin[J].Lithologic Reservoirs,2007,19(4):40-44.
[15] 王景,凌升阶,南中虎.特低渗透砂岩微裂缝分布研究方法探索[J].石油勘探与开发,2003,30(2):51-53.
WANG Jing,LING Shengjie,NAN Zhonghu.Micro-fractures distribution in extremely lower permeable sandstone reservoirs of Yanchang Formation and its geologic significance,Ordos Basin,Northwest China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2003,30(2):51-53.
[16] RASMUS J C.A Summary of the effects of various pore geometries and their wettabilities on measured and in-situ values of cementation and saturation exponents[R].SPWLA 1986,1986.
[17] 王建民,张三.特低渗砂岩储集层孔隙结构差异与低电阻率油层成因——以鄂尔多斯盆地中部烟雾峁区块为例[J].石油勘探与开发,2018,45(2):257-264.
WANG Jianmin,ZHANG San.Pore structure differences of the extra-low permeability sandstone reservoirs and the causes of low resistivity oil layers:a case study of Block Yanwumao in the middle of Ordos Basin,NW China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2018,45(2):257-264.
[18] 丁娱娇,邵维志,王志勇,等.不同泥浆侵入环境下储层电性变化特征[J].测井技术,2009,33(4):315-320.
DING Yujiao,SHAO Weizhi,WANG Zhiyong,et al.On the characteristics of formation resistivity variation under different mud invasion environments[J].Well Logging Technology,2009,33(4):315-320.
[19] 张开洪,陈一健.泥浆滤液侵入对岩石物性及电性影响的实验研究[J].西南石油学院学报,1994,16(4):51-55.
ZHANG Kaihong,CHEN Yijian.Effect of mud filter invasion on permeability and resistivity of rock[J].Journal of Southwest Petroleum Institute,1994,16(4):51-55.
[20] 欧阳健.油藏中饱和度-电阻率分布规律研究——深入分析低电阻油层基本成因[J].石油勘探与开发,2002,29(3):44-47.
OUYANG Jian.A study on saturation-resistivity distribution pattern of reservoirs——An in-depth analysis for the basic origin of low resistivity reservoirs[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2002,29(3):44-47.
[21] 张松扬,陈玉魁.钻井液侵入机理特征及影响因素研究[J].勘探地球物理进展,2002,25(6):28-31.
ZHANG Songyang,CHEN Yukui.Reponses to drilling-fluid[J].Progress in Exploration Geophysics,2002,25(6):28-31.
[22] 刘尊年,孙建孟,迟秀荣,等.泥浆侵入研究现状分析[J].地球物理学进展,2012,27(6):2594-2601.
LIU Zunnian,SUN Jianmeng,CHI Xiurong,et al.Analysis of research present situation of mud invasion[J].Progress in Geophysics,2012,27(6):2594-2601.
[23] 李长喜,李潮流,周灿灿,等.淡水钻井液侵入对双感应和双侧向测井响应的影响[J].石油勘探与开发,2007,34(5):603-608.
LI Changxi,LI Chaoliu,ZHOU Cancan,et al.Effects of fresh drilling mud invasion on logging responses of dual induction and dual lateral to reservoirs[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2007,34(5):603-608.
[24] 黄龙,鲍志东,张文瑞,等.淡水泥浆侵入引起的低阻油气层实例分析[J].西南石油大学学报:自然科学版,2008,30(2):14-18.
HUANG Long,BAO Zhidong,ZHANG Wenrui,et al.Case study on low resistivity oil & gas zone caused by fresh water mud invasion[J].Journal of Southwest Petroleum University:Science & Technology Edition,2008,30(2):14-18.
[25] 王建华,鄢捷年,郑曼,等.钻井液固相和滤液侵入储层深度的预测模型[J].石油学报,2009,30(6):923-926.
WANG Jianhua,YAN Jienian,ZHENG Man,et al.Prediction model for invasion radius of solids and filtrate in drilling fluids[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2009,30(6):923-926.
[26] 范翔宇,龚明,夏宏泉,等.裂缝性致密砂岩储层钻井液侵入深度的定量计算方法[J].天然气工业,2012,32(6):60-64.
FAN Xiangyu,GONG Ming,XIA Hongquan,et al.A quantitative calculation method of the invasion depth of drilling fluids into the fractured tight sandstone reservoirs[J].Natural Gas Industry,2012,32(6):60-64.
[27] 王明波,郭亚亮,方明君,等.裂缝性地层钻井液漏失动力学模拟及规律[J].石油学报,2017,38(5):597-606.
WANG Mingbo,GUO Yaliang,FANG Mingjun,et al.Dynamics simulation and laws of drilling fluid loss in fractured formations[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2017,38(5):597-606.
[28] 谢景彬,龙国清,田昌炳,等.特低渗透砂岩油藏动态裂缝成因及对注水开发的影响——以安塞油田王窑区长6油组为例[J].油气地质与采收率,2015,22(3):106-110.
XIE Jingbin,LONG Guoqing,TIAN Changbing,et al.Genetic mechanism of dynamic fracture and its influence on water flooding development in extra-low permeability sandstone reservoir:a case of Chang6 member in Wangyao area,Ansai Oilfield[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2015,22(3):106-110.
[29] 曲占庆,周丽萍,曲冠政,等.高速通道压裂支撑裂缝导流能力实验评价[J].油气地质与采收率,2015,22(1):122-126.
QU Zhanqing,ZHOU Liping,QU Guanzheng,et al.Experimental evaluation on influencing factors of flow conductivity for channel fracturing proppant[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2015,22(1):122-126.
[30] 雷强,唐洪明,张烈辉,等.钻井液在致密砂岩中裂缝的侵入深度模型[J].西南石油大学学报:自然科学版,2018,40(4):97-104.
LEI Qiang, TANG Hongming,ZHANG Liehui,et al. Invasion depth model for drilling fluids in fractures in dense sandstones[J].Journal of Southwest Petroleum University:Science & Technology Edition,2018,40(4):97-104.
[31] 刘顺,何衡,赵倩云,等.水力裂缝与天然裂缝交错延伸规律[J].石油学报,2018,39(3):320-326.
LIU Shun,HE Heng,ZHAO Qianyun,et al.Staggered extension laws of hydraulic fracture and natural fracture[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2018,39(3):320-326.
[32] 毕海滨,段晓文,郑婧,等.致密油生产动态特征及可采储量评估方法[J].石油学报,2018,39(2):172-179.
BI Haibin,DUAN Xiaowen,ZHENG Jing,et al.Production dynamic characteristics and recoverable reserve estimation method of tight oil[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2018,39(2):172-179.
[33] 魏漪,徐婷,钟敏,等.不同基质-裂缝耦合模式下致密油生产动态特征[J].油气地质与采收率,2018,25(2):83-89.
WEI Yi,XU Ting,ZHONG Min,et al.Dynamic characteristics under different matrix-fracture coupling modes in tight oil reservoirs[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2018,25(2):83-89.
[34] 毛振强,李明,于红军,等.樊31北块特低渗透油藏初始含水率的影响因素[J].油气地质与采收率,2006,13(5):62-65.
MAO Zhenqiang,LI Ming,YU Hongjun,et al.Factors affecting the initial water cut in ultra-low permeability oil reservoirs of north Fan31 block[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2006,13(5):62-65.
[35] 邵东波,谢先奎,张高源,等.超低渗透砂岩油藏微观渗流特征及驱油效率的影响因素[J].地球物理学进展,2017,32(4):1628-1635.
SHAO Dongbo,XIE Xiankui,ZHANG Gaoyuan,et al.Micro-flow characteristics and influencing factors of oil displacement efficiency in ultra-low permeability sandstone reservoir[J].Progress in Geophysics,2017,32(4):1628-1635.
[36] 张建国,雷光伦,张艳玉.油气层渗流力学[M].东营:中国石油大学出版社,1998:139-160.
ZHANG Jianguo,LEI Guanglun,ZHANG Yanyu.Seepage mechanics of oil and gas reservoirs[M].Dongying:China University of Petroleum Press,1998:139-160.
[37] 何金钢,康毅力,游利军,等.特低渗透砂岩油藏压裂液损害实验评价[J].油田化学,2013,30(2):173-178.
HE Jingang,KANG Yili,YOU Lijun,et al.Damage evaluation of fracturing fluids on sandstone reservoir with extra-Low permeability[J].Oilfield Chemistry,2013,30(2):173-178.
[38] 孙雷,王智琦,潘毅.X-CT扫描技术与贝克莱-列维尔特水驱油理论对比研究流体饱和度分布[J].科学技术与工程,2017,17(32):87-92.
SUN Lei,WANG Zhiqi,PAN Yi.Comparison of X-CT scanning technique and Berkeley-Villewater water-flooding theory fluid saturation distribution[J].Science Technology and Engineering,2017,17(32):87-92.

特低渗透砂岩油层钻井液侵入程度及影响

Drilling fluid invasion degree and its impact evaluation in ultra-low permeability sandstone reservoir

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 5

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王宝华, 吴淑红, 李巧云, 李小波, 李华. 油藏数值模拟中BILU0-GMRES方法的应用[J]. 石油学报, 2013, 34(5): 954-958.
[2]	任岚赵金洲胡永全罗伟. 压裂井生产动态模拟的天然差分法[J]. 石油学报, 2010, 31(3): 501-505.
[3]	侯健, 郭兰磊, 元福卿, 杜庆军, 于波. 胜利油田不同类型油藏聚合物驱生产动态的定量表征[J]. 石油学报, 2008, 29(4): 577-581.
[4]	宋子齐, 程国建, 王静, 路向伟, 潘艇. 特低渗透油层有效厚度确定方法研究[J]. 石油学报, 2006, 27(6): 103-106.
[5]	石在虹, 李波, 崔斌, 吴应湘. 电潜泵井生产动态分析[J]. 石油学报, 2003, 24(1): 100-104.