珠江口盆地陆丰凹陷深层砂岩储层特征及主控因素

doi:10.7623/syxb2019S1006

石油学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (s1): 69-80.DOI: 10.7623/syxb2019S1006

珠江口盆地陆丰凹陷深层砂岩储层特征及主控因素

朱筱敏¹, 葛家旺^1,2, 吴陈冰洁³, 张向涛⁴, 汪旭东⁴, 李晓燕⁴, 黎明⁴

1. 中国石油大学(北京)地球科学学院北京 102249;
2. 西南石油大学地球科学与技术学院四川成都 610500;
3. 中国石化集团新星石油有限责任公司新能源研究院北京 100083;
4. 中海石油(中国)有限公司深圳分公司广东深圳 518067

收稿日期:2018-07-12 修回日期:2018-12-28 出版日期:2019-07-25 发布日期:2019-07-15
通讯作者: 朱筱敏,男,1960年6月生,1982年获华东石油学院石油地质专业学士学位,1990年获石油大学矿产普查与勘探专业博士学位,现为中国石油大学(北京)地球科学学院教授、博士生导师,主要从事层序地层学、沉积储层学和地震沉积学方面的研究。Email:xmzhu@cup.edu.cn
作者简介:朱筱敏,男,1960年6月生,1982年获华东石油学院石油地质专业学士学位,1990年获石油大学矿产普查与勘探专业博士学位,现为中国石油大学(北京)地球科学学院教授、博士生导师,主要从事层序地层学、沉积储层学和地震沉积学方面的研究。Email:xmzhu@cup.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家科技重大专项（2016ZX05001-002）资助。

Reservoir characteristics and main controlling factors of deep sandstone in Lufeng sag, Pearl River Mouth Basin

Zhu Xiaomin¹, Ge Jiawang^1,2, Wu Chenbingjie³, Zhang Xiangtao⁴, Wang Xudong⁴, Li Xiaoyan⁴, Li Ming⁴

1. College of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China;
2. School of Geoscience and Technology, Southwest Petroleum University, Sichuan Chengdu 610500, China;
3. New Energy Research Institute, Sinopec Star Petroleum Co. Ltd., Beijing 100083, China;
4. Shenzhen Branch of CNOOC China Limited, Guangdong Shenzhen 518067, China

Received:2018-07-12 Revised:2018-12-28 Online:2019-07-25 Published:2019-07-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

珠江口盆地陆丰凹陷深层碎屑岩储层埋深普遍大于3 000 m，储层质量较差且非均质性强，制约油气高效勘探。综合运用岩心、薄片鉴定、物性测试、压汞测试以及测录井等分析手段，对陆丰凹陷古近系文昌组和恩平组深埋碎屑岩开展了储层岩石学特征、成岩作用及优质储层主控因素研究。研究表明，古近系文昌组岩石类型为岩屑质石英砂岩，储层孔隙主要由原生孔和次生孔构成，表现为一套特低-低孔隙度（平均孔隙度为9.42%）、超低-低渗透率（平均渗透率为8.38 mD）储层特征；恩平组储层主要由长石岩屑质石英砂岩构成，储层总体属于低-中孔隙度（平均孔隙度14.66%）、低-中渗透率储层（平均渗透率为198.43 mD），以原生孔为主。在3 600~4 400 m深度段，发育一套高孔隙度的优质储层带，主体为原生孔，可见大量次生溶蚀孔隙，孔隙度可达20%，渗透率可达263.74 mD。这套优质储层形成条件包括：①先天条件好，长距离搬运的辫状河三角洲前缘中厚层砂体，具备岩性较粗、石英含量高、杂基含量低和结构成熟度高的特征，保留了较多的原生孔隙；②与生烃液态窗埋深对应良好，有机酸易对储层中长石和岩屑产生强烈溶蚀，明显改善了储层物性；③油气充注发生在长石和岩屑溶蚀之后、晚期碳酸盐胶结物大量形成之前，是优质储层得以保存的又一重要条件。总体而言，沉积条件、溶蚀作用和油气充注时间三者的良好匹配是深层优质储层形成的根本原因。这些认识对于珠江口盆地深层油气勘探以及相似地质背景的优质储层预测具有一定的启示作用。

关键词: 储层特征, 主控因素, 高孔隙度带, 古近系, 陆丰凹陷, 珠江口盆地

Abstract:

The Lufeng sag of Pearl River Mouth Basin is characterized the deep clastic rock reservoir generally with a burial depth greater than 3 000 m, poor quality and high heterogeneity, thus restricting the efficient exploration of oil and gas. Comprehensively using the technical analysis methods such as core and thin section identification, physical property test, mercury intrusion test and logging, this paper studies the reservoir petrological characteristics, diagenesis and main controlling factors of high-quality reservoirs in the deep-buried clastic rocks of Paleogene Wenchang Formation and Enping Formation in Lufeng sag. The study shows that the Paleogene Wenchang Formation is dominated by lithic quartz sandstone, and the reservoir pores are mainly composed of primary and secondary pores, characterized by a set of ultra low-low porosities (average porosity of 9.42%) and ultra low-low permeabilities (average permeability of 8.38 mD). Enping Formation is mainly composed of feldspar lithic quartz sandstone, and the reservoir has generally low-medium porosity (average porosity of 14.66%) and low-medium permeability (average permeability of 198.43 mD), dominated by primary pores. In the depth range of 3 600-4 400 m, a set of high-quality reservoirs with high porosity is developed, dominated by primary pores. This study also detects a large number of secondary dissolution pores with the porosity of 20% and the permeability of 263.74 mD. The formation conditions of this set of high-quality reservoir include:(1) the medium-thick sand body of well-developed braided river delta front formed through long-distance transport with the characteristics of coarse lithology, high quartz content, low heterogeneous content and high structural maturity, retaining more primary pores. (2) it well corresponds to the buried depth of hydrocarbon-generation liquid window, and organic acid is prone to cause strong corrosion of the feldspar and cuttings in reservoir, significantly improving the reservoir physical properties. (3) oil and gas charging occurs posterior to feldspar and clastic dissolution but prior to the formation of many carbonate cements in the later period, which is another important condition for preserving high-quality reservoirs. In general, the good matching of sedimentary conditions, dissolution and hydrocarbon charging time is the root cause for the formation of high-quality deep reservoirs. Obviously, these insights have significant implications for deep oil and gas exploration in Pearl River Mouth Basin and high-quality reservoir predictions under similar geological settings.

Key words: reservoir characteristics, main controlling factors, high-porosity zone, Paleogene, Lufeng sag, Pearl River Mouth Basin

中图分类号:

TE122.2

朱筱敏, 葛家旺, 吴陈冰洁, 张向涛, 汪旭东, 李晓燕, 黎明. 珠江口盆地陆丰凹陷深层砂岩储层特征及主控因素[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(s1): 69-80.

Zhu Xiaomin, Ge Jiawang, Wu Chenbingjie, Zhang Xiangtao, Wang Xudong, Li Xiaoyan, Li Ming. Reservoir characteristics and main controlling factors of deep sandstone in Lufeng sag, Pearl River Mouth Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2019, 40(s1): 69-80.

参考文献

[1] 钟大康,漆立新,云露,等.塔里木盆地塔河油田石炭系卡拉沙依组砂岩储层特征与物性控制因素[J].地球科学与环境学报,2013,35(1):48-55.
ZHONG Dakang,QI Lixin,YUN Lu,et al.Reservoir characteristics and controlling factors on physical properties of sandstones in Kalashayi Formation of carboniferous from Tahe oilfield of Tarim Basin[J].Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment,2013,35(1):48-55.
[2] 钟大康,朱筱敏,张枝焕,等.东营凹陷古近系砂岩储集层物性控制因素评价[J].石油勘探与开发,2003,30(3):95-98.
ZHONG Dakang,ZHU Xiaomin,ZHANG Zhihuan,et al.Controlling factors of sandstone reservoir of the Paleogene in Dongying sag[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2003,30(3):95-98.
[3] 朱筱敏,米立军,钟大康,等.济阳坳陷古近系成岩作用及其对储层质量的影响[J].古地理学报,2006,8(3):295-305.
ZHU Xiaomin,MI Lijun,ZHONG Dakang,et al.Paleogene diagenesis and its control on the reservoir quality in Jiyang Sag[J].Journal of Palaeogeography,2006,8(3):295-305.
[4] 朱筱敏,王英国,钟大康,等.济阳坳陷古近系储层孔隙类型与次生孔隙成因[J].地质学报,2007,81(2):197-204.
ZHU Xiaomin,WANG Yingguo,ZHONG Dakang,et al.Pore types and secondary pore evolution of Paleogene reservoir in the Jiyang sag[J].Acta Geologica Sinica,2007,81(2):197-204.
[5] 李军亮.渤海湾盆地东营凹陷深层砂砾岩储层成岩演化特征[J].石油实验地质,2008,30(3):252-255.
LI Junliang.Diagenesis evolution characteristics of deep buried glutenite reservoir bed in the Dongying sag,the Bohai Bay Basin[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2008,30(3):252-255.
[6] 祝海华,钟大康,张亚雄,等.川南地区三叠系须家河组致密砂岩孔隙类型及物性控制因素[J].石油与天然气地质,2014,35(1):65-76.
ZHU Haihua,ZHONG Dakang,ZHANG Yaxiong,et al.Pore types and controlling factors on porosity and permeability of Upper Triassic Xujiahe tight sandstone reservoir in Southern Sichuan Basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2014,35(1):65-76.
[7] MORAD S,AL-RAMADAN K,KETZER J M,et al.The impact of diagenesis on the heterogeneity of sandstone reservoirs:a review of the role of depositional facies and sequence stratigraphy[J].AAPG Bulletin,2010,94(8):1267-1309.
[8] KIM J C,LEE Y I,HISADA K I.Depositional and compositional controls on sandstone diagenesis,the Tetori Group (Middle Jurassic-Early Cretaceous),central Japan[J].Sedimentary Geology,2007,195(3/4):183-202.
[9] OSBORNE M J,SWARBRICK R E.Diagenesis in North Sea HPHT clastic reservoirs-consequences for porosity and overpressure prediction[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,1999,16(4):337-353.
[10] FAWAD M,MONDOL N H,JAHREN J,et al.Mechanical compaction and ultrasonic velocity of sands with different texture and mineralogical composition[J]. Geophysical Prospecting,2011,59(4):697-720.
[11] SHANLEY K W,CLUFF R M,ROBINSON J W.Factors controlling prolific gas production from low-permeability sandstone reservoirs:implications for resource assessment,prospect development,and risk analysis[J].AAPG Bulletin,2004,88(8):1083-1121.
[12] 陈长民,施和生,许仕策,等.珠江口盆地(东部)第三系油气藏形成条件[M].北京:科学出版社,2003:35-40.
CHEN Changmin,SHI Hesheng,XU Shice,et al.The condition of forming tertiary reservoir in Pearl River Mouth Basin (East)[M].Beijing:Science Press,2003:35-40.
[13] 施和生,雷永昌,吴梦霜,等.珠一坳陷深层砂岩储层孔隙演化研究[J].地学前缘,2008,15(1):169-175.
SHI Hesheng,LEI Yongchang,WU Mengshuang,et al.Research on the evolution of pores in deep sandstone reservoir in ZHU 1 depression[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2008,15(1):169-175.
[14] 龙更生,施和生,郑荣才,等.珠江口盆地惠州凹陷深部储层成岩作用与孔隙演化[J].岩石矿物学杂志,2011,30(4):665-673.
LONG Gengsheng,SHI Hesheng,ZHENG Rongcai,et al.Diagenesis and porosity evolution of deep reservoirs in Huizhou depression Pearl River Mouth Basin[J].Acta Petrologica et Mineralogica,2011,30(4):665-673.
[15] 葛家旺,朱筱敏,潘荣,等.珠江口盆地惠州凹陷文昌组砂岩孔隙定量演化模式——以HZ-A地区辫状河三角洲储层为例[J].沉积学报,2015,33(1):183-193.
GE Jiawang,ZHU Xiaomin,PANG Rong,et al.A quantitative porosity evolution model of sandstone for Wenchang Formation in Huizhou depression,Pearl River Mouth Basin:a case study for braided fluvial delta reservoir of HZ-A area[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2015,33(1):183-193.
[16] 罗东红,梁卫,李熙盛,等.珠江口盆地陆丰13-1油田古近系恩平组突破及其重要意义[J].中国海上油气,2011,23(2):71-75.
LUO Donghong,LIANG Wei,LI Xisheng,et al.A breakthrough at Paleogene enping formation and its important significance in Lufeng 13-1 oilfield,Pearl River Mouth Basin[J].China Offshore Oil and Gas,2011,23(2):71-75.
[17] 张向涛,汪旭东,舒誉,等.珠江口盆地陆丰凹陷大中型油田地质特征及形成条件[J].中南大学学报:自然科学版,2017,48(11):2979-2989.
ZHANG Xiangtao,WANG Xudong,SHU Yu,et al.Geological characteristics and forming conditions of large and medium oilfields in Lufeng sag of Eastern Pearl River Mouth Basin[J].Journal of Central South University:Science and Technology,2017,48(11):2979-2989.
[18] 焦鹏,郭建华,张向涛,等.陆丰地区古近系恩平组沉积演化特征及沉积模式[J].中国石油大学学报:自然科学版,2017,41(5):9-19.
JIAO Peng,GUO Jianhua,ZHANG Xiangtao,et al.Sedimentary evolution characteristics and sedimentary model of Paleogene Enping Formation,Lufeng area,Pearl River Mouth Basin[J].Journal of China University of Petroleum:Edition of Natural Science,2017,41(5):9-19.
[19] 葛家旺,朱筱敏,黎明,等.陆丰凹陷东部缓坡带层序地层样式及控制因素[J].中国矿业大学学报,2017,46(3):563-577.
GE Jiawang,ZHU Xiaomin,LI Ming,et al.Sequence architecture and controlling factors of the Wenchang Formation in the gentle slope of eastern Lufeng depression,Pearl River Mouth Basin[J].Journal of China University of Mining & Technology,2017,46(3):563-577.
[20] 葛家旺,朱筱敏,张向涛,等.珠江口盆地陆丰凹陷文昌组构造-沉积演化模式[J].中国矿业大学学报,2018,47(2):308-322.
GE Jiawang,ZHU Xiaomin,ZHANG Xiangtao,et al.Tectono-sedimentation model of the Eocene Wenchang formation in the Lufeng depression,Pearl River Mouth Basin[J].Journal of China University of Mining & Technology,2018,47(2):308-322.
[21] 施和生.油气勘探"源-汇-聚"评价体系及其应用——以珠江口盆地珠一坳陷为例[J].中国海上油气,2015,27(5):1-12.
SHI Hesheng."Source-migration-accumulation" evaluation system and its application in hydrocarbon exploration:a case study of Zhu I depression in Pearl River Mouth Basin[J].China Offshore Oil and Gas,2015,27(5):1-12.
[22] 崔莎莎,何家雄,陈胜红,等.珠江口盆地发育演化特征及其油气成藏地质条件[J].天然气地球科学,2009,20(3):384-391.
CUI Shasha,HE Jiaxiong,CHEN Shenghong,et al.Development characteristics of Pearl River Mouth Basin and its geological conditions for oil and gas accumulation[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2009,20(3):384-391.
[23] 李明刚,禚喜准,陈刚,等.恩平凹陷珠海组储层的孔隙度演化模型[J].石油学报,2009,30(6):862-868.
LI Minggang,ZHUO Xizhun,CHEN Gang,et al.Application of porosity evolution model to reservoir assessment of Zhuhai Formation in Enping sag[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2009,30(6):862-868.
[24] SURDAM R C,CROSSEY L J,HAGEN E S,et al.Organic-inorganic interactions and sandstone diagenesis[J].AAPG Bulletin,1989,73(1):1-23.
[25] SCHMIDT V,MCDONALD D A.Secondary reservoir porosity in the course of sandstone diagenesis[M].Tulsa,OK:AAPG,1979.
[26] 黄思静,黄可可,冯立文,等.成岩过程中长石、高岭石、伊利石之间的物质交换与次生孔隙的形成:来自鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界和川西凹陷三叠系须家河组的研究[J].地球化学,2009,38(5):498-506.
HUANG Sijing,HUANG Keke,FENG Liwen,et al.Mass exchanges among feldspar,kaolinite and illite and their influences on secondary porosity formation in clastic diagenesis——a case study on the Upper Paleozoic,Ordos Basin and Xujiahe Formation,Western Sichuan depression[J].Geochimica,2009,38(5):498-506.
[27] 史基安,晋慧娟,薛莲花.长石砂岩中长石溶解作用发育机理及其影响因素分析[J].沉积学报,1994,12(3):67-75.
SHI Ji'an,JIN Huijuan,XUE Lianhua.Analysis on mechanism of feldspar dissolution and its influencing factors in feldspar-rich sandstone reservoir[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 1994,12(3):67-75.
[28] 于川淇,宋晓蛟,李景景,等.长石溶蚀作用对储层物性的影响——以渤海湾盆地东营凹陷为例[J].石油与天然气地质,2013,34(6):765-770.
YU Chuanqi,SONG Xiaojiao,LI Jingjing,et al.Impact of feldspar dissolution on reservoir physical properties:a case from Dongying sag,the Bohai Bay Basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2013,34(6):765-770.

珠江口盆地陆丰凹陷深层砂岩储层特征及主控因素

Reservoir characteristics and main controlling factors of deep sandstone in Lufeng sag, Pearl River Mouth Basin

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	周立宏, 陈长伟, 杨飞, 李宏军, 刘国全, 崔宇, 吴雪松, 石倩茹, 徐雯婧, 董文韬. 陆相断陷盆地深凹区致密油气成藏模式与勘探实践——以渤海湾盆地黄骅坳陷为例[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(5): 755-770.
[2]	高阳东, 刘军, 彭光荣, 陈林, 王梓颐, 史玉玲. 珠江口盆地油气勘探新领域及资源潜力[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(1): 183-201.
[3]	朱相羽, 段宏亮, 孙雅雄. 苏北盆地高邮凹陷古近系陆相页岩油勘探突破及意义[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(8): 1206-1221,1257.
[4]	高阳东, 彭光荣, 陈兆明, 姜大朋, 马宁, 李潇, 吕华星, 高中亮. 珠江口盆地开平凹陷深水古近系勘探重大发现及意义[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(7): 1029-1040.
[5]	王永诗, 郝雪峰, 安天下, 张鹏飞, 熊伟, 秦峰. 盆地结构控制下的地层压力-流体-储集性协同演化及控藏作用——以东营凹陷古近系为例[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(7): 1058-1071,1150.
[6]	周立宏, 陈长伟, 崔宇, 杨飞, 刘国全, 李宏军, 邹磊落, 王文庆, 周凤春. 渤海湾盆地黄骅坳陷油气勘探新领域、新类型及资源潜力[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(12): 2160-2178.
[7]	彭光荣, 郭婧, 姜福杰, 姜大朋, 吴宇琦, 陈兆明, 宋泽章, 高中亮, 张宇琦. 珠江口盆地开平凹陷烃源岩地球化学特征与油源对比[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(10): 1624-1636.
[8]	党伟, 张金川, 聂海宽, 王凤琴, 唐玄, 蒋恕, 魏晓亮, 刘秋波, 李沛, 李菲, 孙江涛. 页岩油微观赋存特征及其主控因素——以鄂尔多斯盆地延安地区延长组7段3亚段陆相页岩为例[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(4): 507-523.
[9]	唐勇, 宋永, 郭旭光, 赵靖舟, 吴涛, 黄立良, 何文军, 吴伟涛, 吴和源. 准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷源上致密砾岩油富集的主控因素[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(2): 192-206.
[10]	刘惠民, 李军亮, 刘鹏, 王鑫, 王勇, 邱贻博, 李政, 王伟庆. 济阳坳陷古近系页岩油富集条件与勘探战略方向[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(12): 1717-1729.
[11]	刘翰林, 邹才能, 邱振, 潘松圻, 张文正, 荆振华, 郝记华, 尹帅, 吴松涛, 李士祥, 郭秋雷. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组7段3亚段异常高有机质沉积富集因素[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(11): 1520-1541.
[12]	刘凯旋, 陈践发, 付娆, 汪华, 罗冰, 戴鑫, 师肖飞, 董勍伟. 富氦天然气藏成藏特征及主控因素[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(11): 1652-1663.
[13]	张向涛, 李军, 向绪洪, 赵靖舟. 珠江口盆地深水区白云凹陷超压成因机制及其勘探意义[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(1): 41-57.
[14]	张向涛, 李小平, 玄昌姬, 杜家元, 丁琳, 李智高, 陈维涛. 南海东部浅水区非烃源岩层系岩性油藏勘探实践与方向[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(6): 695-707.
[15]	吴建发, 赵圣贤, 范存辉, 夏自强, 季春海, 张成林, 曹埒焰. 川南长宁地区龙马溪组富有机质页岩裂缝发育特征及其与含气性的关系[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(4): 428-446.