鄂尔多斯盆地旬邑探区延长组储层特征和开发效果

doi:10.7623/syxb202001008

石油学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (1): 88-95.DOI: 10.7623/syxb202001008

鄂尔多斯盆地旬邑探区延长组储层特征和开发效果

张磊¹, 乔向阳¹, 张亮¹, 吴克柳², 周伟³, 白慧芳¹, 辛翠平¹, 王涛¹

1. 陕西延长石油(集团)有限责任公司研究院陕西西安 710065;
2. 中国石油大学(北京)油气资源与探测国家重点实验室北京 102249;
3. 长安大学地球科学与资源学院陕西西安 710054

收稿日期:2019-01-21 修回日期:2019-07-11 出版日期:2020-01-25 发布日期:2020-02-06
通讯作者: 张磊,男,1987年2月生,2010年获西安石油大学学士学位,2013年获中国石油大学(北京)硕士学位,现为陕西延长石油(集团)有限责任公司研究院工程师,主要从事油气田开发机理及产能评价相关工作。Email:zleipiece@126.com
作者简介:张磊,男,1987年2月生,2010年获西安石油大学学士学位,2013年获中国石油大学(北京)硕士学位,现为陕西延长石油(集团)有限责任公司研究院工程师,主要从事油气田开发机理及产能评价相关工作。Email:zleipiece@126.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目（No.51804036）、陕西省科技统筹创新工程计划项目（2016KTCL01-12）和北京市自然科学基金项目（2204093）资助。

Reservoir characteristics and development performance of Yanchang Formation in Xunyi exploration area,Ordos Basin

Zhang Lei¹, Qiao Xiangyang¹, Zhang Liang¹, Wu Keliu², Zhou Wei³, Bai Huifang¹, Xin Cuiping¹, Wang Tao¹

1. Research Institute of Shaanxi Yanchang Petroleum(Group) Co., Ltd., Shaanxi Xi'an 710065, China;
2. State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China;
3. School of Earth Science and Resources, Chang'an University, Shaanxi Xi'an 710054, China

Received:2019-01-21 Revised:2019-07-11 Online:2020-01-25 Published:2020-02-06

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

鄂尔多斯盆地旬邑探区延长组开发潜力较大，储层特征的定量评价对准确预测开发效果具有指导意义。选取延长组6段（长6）和延长组8段（长8）储层典型岩心进行实验分析，核磁共振实验结果显示长6和长8储层孔喉分布特征较为单一，不进行离心实验的情况下可利用核磁共振渗透率和T₂几何平均值计算可动流体百分数。恒速压汞实验结果表明，孔隙比喉道发育均匀，未开展其他实验的情况下可利用恒速压汞实验计算孔隙度。通过建立核磁共振和恒速压汞耦合求取完整孔喉半径分布的方法，确定了旬邑探区延长组长6和长8储层的表面弛豫率为0.15 μm/ms。核磁共振孔喉半径分布的计算结果显示，长6储层孔喉半径分布范围为0.01~433.10 μm，长8储层孔喉半径分布范围为0.01~403.91 μm，长6储层孔喉发育比长8储层均匀。通过定义拟粒间孔和拟溶蚀孔，拟溶蚀孔绝对体积占比揭示，长8储层渗流能力强于长6储层。建立了"拟溶蚀孔+含油饱和度"方法预测开发效果，分析认为拟溶蚀孔对试油产量的影响更大，进一步揭示了旬邑探区长8储层整体开发效果好于长6储层。

关键词: 鄂尔多斯盆地, 核磁共振, 恒速压汞, 表面弛豫率, 拟粒间孔, 拟溶蚀孔, 开发效果预测

Abstract:

Yanchang Formation in Xunyi exploration area of Ordos Basin has great development potential, and the quantitative evaluation of reservoir characteristics has a certain guiding significance for accurately predicting development performance. Typical cores of Chang 6 and Chang 8 reservoirs are selected for experiments. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR)results indicate that both Chang 6 and Chang 8 reservoirs show the relatively single distribution characteristics of pore throat; the percentage of movable fluid can be calculated using the NMR permeability or T₂ geometric mean without doing centrifugation experiments; the constant-rate mercury injection experiment results show the more uniform pore development than throat development, and the porosity can be calculated by constant-rate mercury injection experiment in case of no other experiments. This study establishes a method for obtaining complete pore throat radius distribution by the coupling between NMR and constant-rate mercury injection experiment; the surface relaxivity of Chang 6 and Chang 8 reservoirs of Yanchang Formation in Xunyi exploration area is determined as 0.15 μm/ms. The NMR experiment shows that the pore radius distribution in Chang 6 and Chang 8 reservoir is within the range of 0.01-433.10 μm and 0.01-403.91 μm respectively, indicating the more homogeneous pore throat development in the latter. Pseudo intergranular pores and pseudo dissolution pores are defined, and the absolute volume ratio of pseudo dissolution pores indicate Chang 8 reservoir has greater seepage capacity than Chang 6 reservoir. Moreover, this study sets up the method to predict development performance by "pseudo dissolution pores + oil saturation", and the analysis results show pseudo dissolution pores have a greater impact on the oil test production, thus achieving the prediction of oil well production. The further study reveals that on the whole, Chang 8 reservoir presents better development than Chang 6 reservoir in Xunyi exploration area.

Key words: Ordos Basin, nuclear magnetic resonance, constant-rate mercury injection, surface relaxivity, pseudo intergranular pores, pseudo dissolution pores, development performance prediction

中图分类号:

TE348

张磊, 乔向阳, 张亮, 吴克柳, 周伟, 白慧芳, 辛翠平, 王涛. 鄂尔多斯盆地旬邑探区延长组储层特征和开发效果[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(1): 88-95.

Zhang Lei, Qiao Xiangyang, Zhang Liang, Wu Keliu, Zhou Wei, Bai Huifang, Xin Cuiping, Wang Tao. Reservoir characteristics and development performance of Yanchang Formation in Xunyi exploration area,Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(1): 88-95.

参考文献

[1] 胡伟. 旬邑探区延长组长6、长8油层试油研究[D].西安:西安石油大学,2015.
HU Wei.Chang 6,Chang 8 oil test research in Xunyi area[D].Xi'an:Xi'an Shiyou University,2015.
[2] 方艳梅.鄂尔多斯盆地旬邑探区延长组油气储层岩石学特征研究[D].西安:长安大学,2016.
FANG Yanmei.Research on characteristics of the Yanchang Formation reservoir petrology in Xunyi exploration area of Ordos Basin[D].Xi'an:Chang'an University,2016.
[3] 唐建云,王志维,也尔哈那提·黑扎提,等.鄂尔多斯盆地旬邑探区延长组烃源岩及原油地球化学特征[J].岩性油气藏,2017,29(2):107-116.
TANG Jianyun,WANG Zhiwei,YE'ERHANATI Heizhati,et al.Source rocks and geochemical characteristics of crude oil of the Yanchang Formation in Xunyi exploration area,Ordos Basin[J].Lithologic Reservoirs,2017,29(2):107-116.
[4] 王勇.鄂尔多斯盆地东南缘(宜川-旬邑)延长组成岩作用与储层特征研究[D].成都:成都理工大学,2007.
WANG Yong.Research on diagenesis and reservoir characteristics of Yanchang Formation in Yichuan-Xunyi area in the southeast of Ordos Basin[D].Chengdu:Chengdu University of Technology,2007.
[5] 赵云.旬邑探区长6油层地质特征及压裂参数优化[D].西安:西安石油大学,2018.
ZHAO Yun.Geological characteristics and fracturing parameters optimization of Chang 6 reservoir in Xunyi exploration area[D].Xi'an:Xi'an Shiyou University,2018.
[6] 袁凯涛.旬邑及周边地区长8期和长6期沉积体系及储层特征研究[D].西安:西北大学,2014.
YUAN Kaitao.The study about sedimentary system and reservoir characteristics of Chang 8 and Chang 6 in the in Xunyi and its adjacent area[D].Xi'an:Northwest University,2014.
[7] 张亮,杨江,张鹏,等.鄂尔多斯盆地旬邑地区长8储层特征及控制因素分析[J].石油地质与工程,2015,29(2):49-52.
ZHANG Liang,YANG Jiang,ZHANG Peng,et al.Analysis of reservoir characteristics and control factors of Chang 8 reservoir in Xunyi area of Ordos Basin[J].Petroleum Geology and Engineering,2015,29(2):49-52.
[8] 田亚铭,施泽进,吴晓明,等.宜川-旬邑地区长8油层组储层特征与控制因素[J].新疆地质,2011,29(3):314-318.
TIAN Yaming,SHI Zejin,WU Xiaoming,et al.Analysis on controlling factors of reservoir characteristic of the Chang 8 member in the Yichuan-Xunyi areas,Ordos Basin[J].Xinjiang Geology,2011,29(3):314-318.
[9] 吴浩,张春林,纪友亮,等.致密砂岩孔喉大小表征及对储层物性的控制——以鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区延长组为例[J].石油学报,2017,38(8):876-887.
WU Hao,ZHANG Chunlin,JI Youliang,et al.Pore-throat size characterization of tight sandstone and its control on reservoir physical properties:a case study of Yanchang Formation,eastern Gansu,Ordos Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2017,38(8):876-887.
[10] 刘标,姚素平,胡文瑄,等.核磁共振冻融法表征非常规油气储层孔隙的适用性[J].石油学报,2017,38(12):1401-1410.
LIU Biao,YAO Suping,HU Wenxuan,et al.Application of nuclear magnetic resonance cryoporometry in unconventional reservoir rocks[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2017,38(12):1401-1410.
[11] 李潮流,胡法龙,袁超,等.利用核磁共振与常规测井联合反演确定致密储层多矿物组分[J].石油学报,2018,39(9):1019-1027.
LI Chaoliu,HU Falong,YUAN Chao,et al.Multi-mineral components of tight reservoirs determined by joint inversion of nuclear magnetic resonance and conventional logs[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2018,39(9):1019-1027.
[12] 吴长辉,赵习森.致密砂岩油藏核磁共振T₂截止值的确定及可动流体喉道下限——以吴仓堡下组合长9油藏为例[J].非常规油气,2017,4(2):91-94,102.
WU Changhui,ZHAO Xisen.Determination of T₂ cut-off value of nuclear magnetic resonance in tight sandstone reservoir and lower limit of movable fluid:a case study of Chang 9 reservoir of Wucangbao oilfield[J].Unconventional Oil & Gas,2017,4(2):91-94,102.
[13] 吴长辉,党海龙,赵思远.恒速压汞在储层微观孔隙结构研究中的应用——以鄂尔多斯盆地吴起油田下组合长9油藏为例[J].非常规油气,2017,4(3):75-80,69.
WU Changhui,DANG Hailong,ZHAO Siyuan.Application of constant pressure mercury in the study of micro-pore structure of reservoir:a case study of Chang 9 reservoir in Wuqi oilfield,Ordos Basin[J].Unconventional Oil & Gas,2017,4(3):75-80,69.
[14] 王瑞飞,陈明强.特低渗透砂岩储层可动流体赋存特征及影响因素[J].石油学报,2008,29(4):558-561,566.
WANG Ruifei,CHEN Mingqiang.Characteristics and influencing factors of movable fluid in ultra-low permeability sandstone reservoir[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2008,29(4):558-561,566.
[15] 代全齐,罗群,张晨,等.基于核磁共振新参数的致密油砂岩储层孔隙结构特征——以鄂尔多斯盆地延长组7段为例[J].石油学报,2016,37(7):887-897.
DAI Quanqi,LUO Qun,ZHANG Chen,et al.Pore structure characteristics of tight-oil sandstone reservoir based on a new parameter measured by NMR experiment:a case study of seventh Member in Yanchang Formation,Ordos Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2016,37(7):887-897.
[16] 刘江斌,李文厚.鄂尔多斯盆地旬邑地区长81致密油储层特征[C]//2015年全国沉积学大会沉积学与非常规资源论文摘要集.武汉:中国地质学会沉积地质专业委员会,中国矿物岩石地球化学学会沉积学专业委员会,2015.
LIU Jiangbin,LI Wenhou.Tight oil reservoir characteristics of Chang 81 reservoir in Xunyi area of Ordos Basin[C]//China National Conference of Sedimentology,Wuhan,2015.Wuhan:Yangtze University College of Earth Science,2015.
[17] 白金莉,李文厚,姜瑀东,等.鄂尔多斯盆地旬邑地区长6₁储层物性影响因素[J].地质科技情报,2017,36(2):198-205.
BAI Jinli,LI Wenhou,JIANG Yudong,et al.Influential factors in the physical properties of the Chang 6₁ reservoir,Yanchang formation in Xunyi area[J].Geological Science and Technology Information,2017,36(2):198-205.
[18] 房涛,张立宽,刘乃贵,等.核磁共振技术定量表征致密砂岩气储层孔隙结构——以临清坳陷东部石炭系-二叠系致密砂岩储层为例[J].石油学报,2017,38(8):902-915.
FANG Tao,ZHANG Likuan,LIU Naigui,et al.Quantitative characterization of pore structure of tight gas sandstone reservoirs by NMR T₂ spectrum technology:a case study of Carboniferous-Permian tight sandstone reservoir in Linqing depression[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2017,38(8):902-915.
[19] 刘堂宴,马在田,傅容珊.核磁共振谱的岩石孔喉结构分析[J].地球物理学进展,2003,18(4):737-742.
LIU Tangyan,MA Zaitian,FU Rongshan.Analysis of rock pore structure with NMR spectra[J].Progress in Geophysics,2003,18(4):737-742.
[20] 李爱芬,任晓霞,王桂娟,等.核磁共振研究致密砂岩孔隙结构的方法及应用[J].中国石油大学学报:自然科学版,2015,39(6):92-98.
LI Aifen,REN Xiaoxia,WANG Guijuan,et al.Characterization of pore structure of low permeability reservoirs using a nuclear magnetic resonance method[J].Journal of China University of Petroleum:Edition of Natural Science,2015,39(6):92-98.
[21] 公言杰,柳少波,赵孟军,等.核磁共振与高压压汞实验联合表征致密油储层微观孔喉分布特征[J].石油实验地质,2016,38(3):389-394.
GONG Yanjie,LIU Shaobo,ZHAO Mengjun,et al.Characterization of micro pore throat radius distribution in tight oil reservoirs by NMR and high pressure mercury injection[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2016,38(3):389-394.
[22] 肖佃师,卢双舫,陆正元,等.联合核磁共振和恒速压汞方法测定致密砂岩孔喉结构[J].石油勘探与开发,2016,43(6):961-970.
XIAO Dianshi,LU Shuangfang,LU Zhengyuan,et al.Combining nuclear magnetic resonance and rate-controlled porosimetry to probe the pore-throat structure of tight sandstones[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2016,43(6):961-970.
[23] 张磊,石军太,张庆辉,等.鄂尔多斯盆地东南部页岩核磁共振实验研究[J].煤炭学报,2018,43(10):2876-2885.
ZHANG Lei,SHI Juntai,ZHANG Qinghui,et al.Experimental study on the nuclear magnetic resonance of shale in the southeastern Ordos Basin[J].Journal of China Coal Society,2018,43(10):2876-2885.
[24] 孙军昌,陈静平,杨正明,等.页岩储层岩芯核磁共振响应特征实验研究[J].科技导报,2012,30(14):25-30.
SUN Junchang,CHEN Jingping,YANG Zhengming,et al.Experimental study of the NMR characteristics of shale reservoir rock[J].Science & Technology Review,2012,30(14):25-30.
[25] 崔连训.恒速压汞及核磁共振在低渗透储层评价中的应用[J].成都理工大学学报:自然科学版,2012,39(4):430-433.
CUI Lianxun.Application of constant-rate intruding mercury and nuclear magnetic resonance method to low permeability reservoir evaluation[J].Journal of Chengdu University of Technology:Science & Technology Edition,2012,39(4):430-433.
[26] 李天降,李子丰,赵彦超,等.核磁共振与压汞法的孔隙结构一致性研究[J].天然气工业,2006,26(10):57-59.
LI Tianjiang,LI Zifeng,ZHAO Yanchao,et al.Consistency of pore structures between NMR and mercury intrusion method[J].Natural Gas Industry,2006,26(10):57-59.
[27] 解伟,张创,孙卫,等.恒速压汞技术在长2储层孔隙结构研究中的应用[J].断块油气田,2011,18(5):549-551.
XIE Wei,ZHANG Chuang,SUN Wei,et al.Application of ASPE technology in pore structure study of Chang 2 reservoir[J].Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field,2011,18(5):549-551.
[28] 何顺利,焦春艳,王建国,等.恒速压汞与常规压汞的异同[J].断块油气田,2011,18(2):235-237.
HE Shunli,JIAO Chunyan,WANG Jianguo,et al.Discussion on the differences between constant-speed mercury injection and conventional mercury injection techniques[J].Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field,2011,18(2):235-237.
[29] SLIJKERMAN W F J,HOFMAN J P,LOOYESTIJN W J,et al.A practical approach to obtain primary drainage capillary pressure curves from NMR core and log data[J].Petrophysics,2001,42(4):334-343.
[30] CARNEIRO G,SOUZA A,BOYD A,et al.Evaluating pore space connectivity by NMR diffusive coupling[R].SPWLA-2014-AA,2014.
[31] 张超谟,陈振标,张占松,等.基于核磁共振T₂谱分布的储层岩石孔隙分形结构研究[J].石油天然气学报(江汉石油学院学报),2007,29(4):80-86.
ZHANG Chaomo,CHEN Zhenbiao,ZHANG Zhansong,et al.Fractal characteristics of reservoir rock pore structure based on NMR T₂ distribution[J].Journal of Oil and Gas Technology (Journal of Jianghan Petroleum Institute),2007,29(4):80-86.
[32] JIANG Tianmin,RYLANDER E,SINGER P M,et al.Integrated petrophysical interpretation of eagle ford shale with 1-D and 2-D nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)[R].SPWLA-2013-LL,2013.
[33] 杨胜来,魏俊之.油层物理学[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2004:157-158.
YANG Shenglai,WEI Junzhi.Fundamentals of petrophysics[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2004:157-158.
[34] 倪玲英,李成华.工程流体力学实验指导书[M].东营:中国石油大学出版社,2009:1-37.
NI Lingying,LI Chenghua.Experiment of engineering fluid mechanics[M].Dongying:China University of Petroleum Press,2009:1-37.

鄂尔多斯盆地旬邑探区延长组储层特征和开发效果

Reservoir characteristics and development performance of Yanchang Formation in Xunyi exploration area,Ordos Basin

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	侯连华, 米敬奎, 罗霞, 于志超, 林森虎, 廖凤荣, 庞正炼, 赵忠英. 压力对页岩原位加热产出油气特征的影响——以鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组7段3亚段页岩为例[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(4): 629-641.
[2]	何永宏, 李桢, 樊建明, 张超, 张旭泽, 马兵. 鄂尔多斯盆地页岩油开发井网优化技术及实践——以庆城油田为例[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(4): 683-697.
[3]	席胜利, 闫伟, 刘新社, 张才利, 殷亮亮, 董国栋, 井向辉, 魏柳斌. 鄂尔多斯盆地天然气勘探新领域、新类型及资源潜力[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(1): 33-51,132.
[4]	牛小兵, 赵伟波, 史云鹤, 胡新友, 杜小伟. 鄂尔多斯盆地本溪组天然气成藏条件及勘探潜力[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(8): 1240-1257.
[5]	魏迎春, 孟涛, 张劲, 王安民, 王亚东. 不同煤体结构煤储层与煤层气井产出煤粉特征的关系——以鄂尔多斯盆地东缘柳林区块为例[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(6): 1000-1014.
[6]	席胜利, 李明瑞, 赵伟波, 付勋勋, 祖凯, 赵小会, 刘晓鹏, 裴文超, 高星, 周国晓, 陈娟萍. 鄂尔多斯盆地横山大型气田成藏条件及勘探开发关键技术[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(6): 1015-1028.
[7]	余浩杰, 王振嘉, 李进步, 朱亚军. 鄂尔多斯盆地长庆气区复杂致密砂岩气藏开发关键技术进展及攻关方向[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(4): 698-712.
[8]	李明瑞, 侯云超, 谢先奎, 张忠义, 张晓磊, 罗丽荣, 邵晓州, 薛楠. 鄂尔多斯盆地平凉—演武地区三叠系延长组油气成藏模式及勘探前景[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(3): 433-446.
[9]	席胜利, 魏嘉怡, 张才利, 王红伟, 井向辉, 杨亚娟, 刘刚, 李涵, 张艳. 鄂尔多斯盆地海相页岩油勘探发现及意义[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(2): 253-269.
[10]	刘显阳, 李士祥, 周新平, 陈修, 刘江艳, 郭芪恒, 魏嘉怡, 廖永乐. 鄂尔多斯盆地石油勘探新领域、新类型及资源潜力[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(12): 2070-2090.
[11]	徐凤银, 王成旺, 熊先钺, 徐博瑞, 王红娜, 赵欣, 江山, 宋伟, 王玉斌, 陈高杰, 吴鹏, 赵靖舟. 鄂尔多斯盆地东缘深部煤层气成藏演化规律与勘探开发实践[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(11): 1764-1780.
[12]	熊先钺, 闫霞, 徐凤银, 李曙光, 聂志宏, 冯延青, 刘莹, 陈明, 孙俊义, 周科, 李春虎. 深部煤层气多要素耦合控制机理、解吸规律与开发效果剖析[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(11): 1812-1826,1853.
[13]	刘建忠, 朱光辉, 刘彦成, 晁巍巍, 杜佳, 杨琦, 米洪刚, 张守仁. 鄂尔多斯盆地东缘深部煤层气勘探突破及未来面临的挑战与对策——以临兴—神府区块为例[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(11): 1827-1839.
[14]	魏国齐, 朱秋影, 杨威, 张春林, 莫午零, 武雪琼. 鄂尔多斯盆地南缘寒武纪铜川裂陷的发现及油气地质意义[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(9): 1223-1235.
[15]	王福伟, 陈冬霞, 解广杰, 李士祥, 曾溅辉, 姚东升, 成铭. 鄂尔多斯盆地庆城地区延长组7段源-储结构控制下致密砂岩油的差异富集机制[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(7): 941-956,976.