陆相断陷湖盆异重流与滑塌型重力流沉积辨别

doi:10.7623/syxb202004002

石油学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (4): 392-402,411.DOI: 10.7623/syxb202004002

陆相断陷湖盆异重流与滑塌型重力流沉积辨别

王家豪¹, 王华¹, 肖敦清², 蒲秀刚², 韩文忠², 张伟²

1. 中国地质大学(武汉)构造与油气资源教育部重点实验室湖北武汉 430074;
2. 中国石油大港油田公司勘探开发研究院天津 300280

收稿日期:2019-04-01 修回日期:2019-09-05 出版日期:2020-04-25 发布日期:2020-05-09
通讯作者: 王家豪,男,1968年10月生,1990年获中国地质大学(武汉)煤田地质勘探专业学士学位,2005年获中国地质大学(武汉)矿场普查与勘探专业博士学位,现为中国地质大学(武汉)副教授,主要从事沉积学、层序地层学教学和科研工作。Email:cugwangjiahao@163.com
作者简介:王家豪,男,1968年10月生,1990年获中国地质大学(武汉)煤田地质勘探专业学士学位,2005年获中国地质大学(武汉)矿场普查与勘探专业博士学位,现为中国地质大学(武汉)副教授,主要从事沉积学、层序地层学教学和科研工作。Email:cugwangjiahao@163.com
基金资助:
国家科技重大专项（2016ZX05026-003）和国家自然科学基金项目（No.U19B2007）资助。

Differentiation between hyperpycnal flow deposition and slump-induced gravity flow deposition in terrestrial rifted lacustrine basin

Wang Jiahao¹, Wang Hua¹, Xiao Dunqing², Pu Xiugang², Han Wenzhong², Zhang Wei²

1. Key Laboratory of Tectonics and Petroleum Resources of Ministry of Education, China University of Geosciences, Hubei Wuhan 430074, China;
2. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, PetroChina Dagang Oilfield Company, Tianjin 300280, China

Received:2019-04-01 Revised:2019-09-05 Online:2020-04-25 Published:2020-05-09

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

异重流和滑塌型重力流是依据沉积物供给条件划分的2种重力流类型，代表了近年来重力流沉积学研究的新进展，但在实际应用中还存在概念混淆和沉积物识别的不确定性问题。基于渤海湾盆地黄骅坳陷歧口凹陷的钻井岩心、测井和砂岩粒度分析资料，对比分析异重流和滑塌型重力流沉积在岩石学、沉积构造和粒度分布特征上的差异和识别标志，研究结果表明，二者在陆相断陷湖盆中的有利发育场所为断控陡坡带扇三角洲前、断阶带辫状河三角洲前和具挠曲坡折的缓坡带三角洲前。异重流沉积突出表现为发育砂基支撑的砂砾岩，砾石磨圆度好，发育粗尾正递变层理或逆递变层理，粒度分布直方图呈双峰式，累积概率曲线呈二级台阶式。相比之下，滑塌型重力流沉积突出表现为分选较好，发育含较多泥岩碎块（撕裂屑）的块状砂岩，具有滑塌构造、液化变形构造和包卷层理，粒度分布直方图呈正态单峰式，累积概率曲线呈上拱式。异重流和滑塌型重力流沉积的差异在于沉积物供给条件和重力流流态的不同。异重流受洪水流物源供给，具有高含水量、低密度和低黏度的特征，主要表现为浊流流态；滑塌型重力流受控于滑塌作用和二次沉积机制，具有低含水量、高密度的特征，主要表现为砂质碎屑流流态。

关键词: 陆相断陷湖盆, 湖底扇, 浊流, 砂质碎屑流, 异重流, 滑塌型重力流

Abstract:

Two types of gravity flow, i.e., hyperpycnal flow and slump-induced gravity flow, are divided according to the sediment supply conditions, representing the new progress in research on gravity flow sedimentology in recent years. However, there are still conceptual confusions and uncertain identifications of sediments in practical applications. Based on the data of drilling core, logging and sandstone grain size from Qikou sag, Huanghua depression, Bohai Bay Basin, a comparative analysis is performed on the differences and the identification marks of depositions between hyperpycnal flow and slump-induced gravity flow in petrology, sedimentary structure and characteristics of grain size distribution. Studies show that the favorable development sites for these two types of gravity flow in terrestrial rifted lacustrine basin are the fan delta front at fault-controlled steep slope zone, braided river-delta front at fault terrace zone, and delta front at the gentle slope zone with bending slope break. The hyperpycnal flow deposition is characterized by the development of sandy conglomerate with good psephicity of gravels, developing coarse-tail normal graded bedding or reverse graded bedding, and showing bimodal and stepwise cumulative probability distribution in grain size analysis. In contrast, the slump-induced gravity flow deposition is characterized by good sorting massive sandstones, containing plenty of mudstone fragments (ripped-up mud clasts), developing slump structure, liquefaction structure and convolute bedding, and showing normal unimodal and convex cumulative probability distribution in grain size analysis. The difference between hyperpycnal flow and slump-induced gravity flow lies in the variations of sediment supply conditions and gravity flow patterns. Fed by the flood flow, the hyperpycnal flow is mainly turbidity flow in flow pattern, with the characteristics of high water content, low density and low viscosity. Controlled by the mechanism of slumping process and secondary deposition, the slump-induced gravity flow is mainly sandy debris flow in flow pattern, with the characteristics of low water content and high density.

Key words: terrestrial rifted lacustrine basin, sublacustrine fan, turbidity flow, sandy debris flow, hyperpycnal flow, slump-induced gravity flow

中图分类号:

TE121.3

王家豪, 王华, 肖敦清, 蒲秀刚, 韩文忠, 张伟. 陆相断陷湖盆异重流与滑塌型重力流沉积辨别[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(4): 392-402,411.

Wang Jiahao, Wang Hua, Xiao Dunqing, Pu Xiugang, Han Wenzhong, Zhang Wei. Differentiation between hyperpycnal flow deposition and slump-induced gravity flow deposition in terrestrial rifted lacustrine basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(4): 392-402,411.

参考文献

[1] 操应长,杨田,王艳忠,等.超临界沉积物重力流形成演化及特征[J].石油学报,2017,38(6):607-621.
CAO Yingchang,YANG Tian,WANG Yanzhong,et al.Formation,evolution and sedimentary characteristics of supercritical sediment gravity -flow[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2017,38(6):607-621.
[2] WANG Jiahao,XIE Xinong,PANG Xiong,et al.Storm-reworked shallow-marine fans in the Middle Triassic Baise area,South China[J].Sedimentary Geology,2017,349:33-45.
[3] SHANMUGAM G,LEHTONEN L R,STRAUME T,et al.Slump and debris-flow dominated upper slope facies in the Cretaceous of the Norwegian and northern North Seas (61-67°N):implications for sand distribution[J].AAPG Bulletin,1994,78(6):910-937.
[4] SHANMUGAM G.High-density turbidity currents:are they sandy debris flows?[J].Journal of Sedimentary Research,1996,66(1):2-10.
[5] MULDER T,MIGEON S,SAVOYE B,et al.Inversely graded turbidite sequences in the deep Mediterranean:a record of deposits from flood-generated turbidity currents?[J].Geo-Marine Letters,2001,21(2):86-93.
[6] 孙福宁,杨仁超,李冬月.异重流沉积研究进展[J].沉积学报,2016,34(3):452-462.
SUN Funing,YANG Renchao,LI Dongyue.Research progresses on hyperpycnal flow deposits[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2016,34(3):452-462.
[7] 潘树新,刘化清,ZAVALA C,等.大型坳陷湖盆异重流成因的水道-湖底扇系统——以松辽盆地白垩系嫩江组一段为例[J].石油勘探与开发,2017,44(6):860-870.
PAN Shuxin,LIU Huaqing,ZAVALA C,et al.Sublacustrine hyperpycnal channel-fan system in a large depression basin:a case study of Nen 1 Member,Cretaceous Nenjiang Formation in the Songliao Basin,NE China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2017,44(6):860-870.
[8] 李相博,刘化清,完颜容,等.鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组砂质碎屑流储集体的首次发现[J].岩性油气藏,2009,21(4):19-21.
LI Xiangbo,LIU Huaqing,WANYAN Rong,et al.First discovery of the sandy debris flow from the Triassic Yanchang Formation,Ordos Basin[J].Lithologic Reservoirs,2009,21(4):19-21.
[9] 李相博,付金华,陈启林,等.砂质碎屑流概念及其在鄂尔多斯盆地延长组深水沉积研究中的应用[J].地球科学进展.2011,26(3):286-294.
LI Xiangbo,FU Jinhua,CHEN Qilin,et al.The concept of sandy debris flow and its application in the Yanchang Formation deep water sedimentation of the Ordos Basin[J].Advances in Earth Science,2011,26(3):286-294.
[10] ZOU Caineng,WANG Lan,LI Ying,et al.Deep-lacustrine transformation of sandy debrites into turbidites,Upper Triassic,Central China[J].Sedimentary Geology,2012,265-266:143-155.
[11] 张国栋,鲜本忠,晁储志,等.鄂尔多斯盆地三水河剖面上三叠统块状砂岩的异重流成因——来自岩石结构的证据[J].沉积学报,2019,37(5):934-944.
ZHANG Guodong,XIAN Benzhong,CHAO Chuzhi,et al.Flood-generated massive sandstones of the Sanshuihe outcrop in the Triassic Ordos Basin:evidence from sedimentary textural characteristics[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2019,37(5):934-944.
[12] VAIL P R,AUDEMARD F,BOWMAN S A,et al.The stratigraphic signatures of tectonics,eustasy and sedimentology:an overview[M]//EINSELE G,RICKEN W,SEILACHER A.Cycles and events in stratigraphy.Berlin,Heidelberg:Springer-Verlag,1991:617-659.
[13] 王家豪,陈红汉,王华,等.伊通地堑永一段大型湖底扇的沉积特点及其对构造事件的响应[J].地质学报,2009,83(4):550-557.
WANG Jiahao,CHEN Honghan,WANG Hua,et al.Depositional characteristics of the large-scale sublacustrine fan at Member Yong 1 of the Yitong graben and its response to tectonic events[J].Acta Geologica Sinica,2009,83(4):550-557.
[14] 鄢继华,陈世悦,姜在兴.东营凹陷北部陡坡带近岸水下扇沉积特征[J].石油大学学报:自然科学版,2005,29(1):12-16.
YAN Jihua,CHEN Shiyue,JIANG Zaixing.Sedimentary characteristics of nearshore subaqueous fans in steep slope of Dongying depression[J].Journal of the University of Petroleum,China,2005,29(1):12-16.
[15] 蒲秀刚,周立宏,韩文中,等.歧口凹陷沙一下亚段斜坡区重力流沉积与致密油勘探[J].石油勘探与开发,2014,41(2):138-149.
PU Xiugang,ZHOU Lihong,HAN Wenzhong,et al.Gravity flow sedimentation and tight oil exploration in lower first Member of Shahejie Formation in slope area of Qikou sag,Bohai Bay Basin[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2014,41(2):138-149.
[16] 郑荣才,李云,戴朝成,等.白云凹陷珠江组深水扇砂质碎屑流沉积学特征[J].吉林大学学报:地球科学版,2012,42(6):1581-1589.
ZHENG Rongcai,LI Yun,DAI Chaocheng,et al.Depositional features of sandy debris flow of submarine fan in Zhujiang Formation,Baiyun sag[J].Journal of Jilin University:Earth Science Edition,2012,42(6):1581-1589.
[17] 陈彬滔,潘树新,梁苏娟,等.陆相湖盆深水块体搬运体优质储层的主控因素——以松辽盆地英台地区青山口组为例[J].吉林大学学报:地球科学版,2015,45(4):1002-1010.
CHEN Bintao,PAN Shuxin,LIANG Sujuan,et al.Main controlling factors of high quality deep-water mass transport deposits (MTDs)reservoir in lacustrine basin:an insight of Qingshankou Formation,Yingtai area,Songliao Basin,Northeast China[J].Journal of Jilin University:Earth Science Edition,2015,45(4):1002-1010.
[18] 杨仁超,金之钧,孙冬胜,等.鄂尔多斯晚三叠世湖盆异重流沉积新发现[J].沉积学报,2015,33(1):10-20.
YANG Renchao,JIN Zhijun,SUN Dongsheng,et al.Discovery of hyperpycnal flow deposits in the Late Triassic lacustrine Ordos Basin[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2015,33(1):10-20.
[19] 杨仁超,尹伟,樊爱萍,等.鄂尔多斯盆地南部三叠系延长组湖相重力流沉积细粒岩及其油气地质意义[J].古地理学报,2017, 19(5):791-806.
YANG Renchao,YIN Wei,FAN Aiping,et al.Fine-grained,lacustrine gravity-flow deposits and their hydrocarbon significance in the Triassic Yanchang Formation in southern Ordos Basin[J].Journal of Palaeogeography,2017,19(5):791-806.
[20] 周立宏,陈长伟,韩国猛,等.断陷湖盆异重流沉积特征与分布模式——以歧口凹陷板桥斜坡沙一下亚段为例[J].中国石油勘探,2018,23(4):11-20.
ZHOU Lihong,CHEN Changwei,HAN Guomeng,et al.Sedimentary characteristics and distribution patterns of hyperpycnal flow in rifted lacustrine basins:a case study on Lower Es₁ of Banqiao slope in Qikou sag[J].China Petroleum Exploration,2018,23(4):11-20.
[21] 王家豪,王华,任建业,等.黄骅坳陷中区大型斜向变换带及其油气勘探意义[J].石油学报,2010,31(3):355-360.
WANG Jiahao,WANG Hua,REN Jianye,et al.A great oblique transition zone in the central Huanghua depression and its significance for petroleum exploration[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2010,31(3):355-360.
[22] ZAVALA C,潘树新.异重流成因和异重岩沉积特征[J].岩性油气藏,2018,30(1):1-18.
ZAVALA C,PAN Shuxing.Hyperpycnal flows and hyperpycnites:origin and distinctive characteristics[J].Lithologic Reservoirs,2018,30(1):1-18.
[23] 栾国强,董春梅,林承焰,等.异重流发育条件、演化过程及沉积特征[J].石油与天然气地质,2018,39(3):438-453.
LUAN Guoqiang,DONG Chunmei,LIN Chengyan,et al.Development conditions,evolution process and depositional features of hyperpycnal flow[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2018,39(3):438-453.
[24] 陈广坡,李娟,吴海波,等.陆相断陷湖盆滑塌型深水重力流沉积特征、识别标志及形成机制——来自海拉尔盆地东明凹陷明D2井全井段连续取心的证据[J].石油学报,2018,39(10):1119-1129.
CHEN Guangpo,LI Juan,WU Haibo,et al.Sedimentary characteristics,identification mark and Formation mechanism of the slumping deepwater gravity flow in fault lacustrine basin:a case study on the consecutive coring well of Ming D2 in Dongming sag,Hailaer Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2018,39(10):1119-1129.
[25] 张译丹,姜在兴,杜克峰,等.鄂尔多斯盆地志丹-富县地区三叠系延长组长8油层组风暴沉积特征及意义[J].石油学报,2019,40(7):813-822.
ZHANG Yidan,JIANG Zaixing,DU Kefeng,et al.Sedimentary characteristics and significances of storm deposition in Chang-8 oil layer of Triassic Yanchang Formation,Zhidan-Fuxian area,Ordos Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2019,40(7):813-822.
[26] 厚刚福,徐洋,孙靖,等.三角洲前缘-湖盆深水区沉积模式及意义——以准噶尔盆地盆1井西凹陷三工河组二段一砂组为例[J].石油学报,2019,40(10):1223-1232.
HOU Gangfu,XU Yang,SUN Jing,et al.Sedimentary model from delta front to deep water area and its significance:a case study of the first sand group of Member 2 of Sangonghe Formation in the Well Pen-1 west sag,Junggar Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2019,40(10):1223-1232.
[27] 夏景生,刘晓涵,王政军,等.渤海湾盆地南堡凹陷西部东营组三段-沙河街组一段砂质碎屑流沉积特征及油气勘探意义[J].石油学报,2017,38(4):399-413.
XIA Jingsheng,LIU Xiaohan,WANG Zhengjun,et al.Sedimentary characteristics of sandy debris flow in the 3rd Member of Dongying Formation and the 1st Member of Shahejie Formation of the western Nanpu sag,Bohai Bay Basin and its significance in hydrocarbon exploration[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2017,38(4):399-413.
[28] 赵贤正,蒲秀刚,王家豪,等.断陷盆地缓坡区控砂控藏机制与勘探发现——以歧口凹陷歧北缓坡带为例[J].石油学报,2017,38(7):729-739.
ZHAO Xianzheng,PU Xiugang,WANG Jiahao,et al.Sand and reservoir controlling mechanism and exploration discovery in the Gentle slope of fault basin:a case study of Qibei slope in Qikou sag[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2017,38(7):729-739.
[29] MARR J G,HARFF P A,SHANMUGAM G,et al.Experiments on subaqueous sandy gravity flows:the role of clay and water content in flow dynamics and depositional structures[J].Geological Society of America Bulletin,2001,113(11):1377-1386.
[30] 唐武,王英民,仲米虹,等.异重流研究进展综述[J].海相油气地质,2016,21(2):47-56.
TANG Wu,WANG Yingmin,ZHONG Mihong,et al.Review of hyperpycnal flow[J].Marine Origin Petroleum Geology,2016,21(2):47-56.
[31] BOURGET J,ZARAGOSI S,MULDER T,et al.Hyperpycnal-fed turbidite lobe architecture and recent sedimentary processes:a case study from the Al Batha turbidite system,Oman margin[J].Sedimentary Geology,2010,229(3):144-159.
[32] 黄银涛,文力,姚光庆,等.莺歌海盆地东方区黄流组细粒厚层重力流砂体沉积特征[J].石油学报,2018,39(3):290-303.
HUANG Yintao,WEN Li,YAO Guangqing,et al.Sedimentary characteristics of thick fine-grained shallow-marine gravity flow deposits from Huangliu Formation in Dongfang area,Yinggehai Basin,China[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2018,39(3):290-303.

陆相断陷湖盆异重流与滑塌型重力流沉积辨别

Differentiation between hyperpycnal flow deposition and slump-induced gravity flow deposition in terrestrial rifted lacustrine basin

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 12

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	李向东, 陈海燕. 深水环境下古水流方向分析和阻塞浊流沉积的识别——以鄂尔多斯盆地桌子山地区上奥陶统拉什仲组为例[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(11): 1348-1365.
[2]	厚刚福, 徐洋, 孙靖, 王力宝, 宋明星, 郭华军, 李亚哲, 陈扬. 三角洲前缘—湖盆深水区沉积模式及意义——以准噶尔盆地盆1井西凹陷三工河组二段一砂组为例[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(10): 1223-1232.
[3]	陈广坡, 李娟, 吴海波, 彭威, 李敬生, 谢明贤, 张斌, 石小茜. 陆相断陷湖盆滑塌型深水重力流沉积特征、识别标志及形成机制——来自海拉尔盆地东明凹陷明D2井全井段连续取心的证据[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(10): 1119-1129.
[4]	高红灿, 郑荣才, 肖斌, 刘云, 郑玲, 栾艳春, 刘虹利. 二连盆地白音查干凹陷下白垩统腾格尔组滑塌-浊流沉积特征——以达49井为例[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38(7): 777-792.
[5]	夏景生, 刘晓涵, 王政军, 文雯, 唐小云. 渤海湾盆地南堡凹陷西部东营组三段-沙河街组一段砂质碎屑流沉积特征及油气勘探意义[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38(4): 399-413.
[6]	杨田, 操应长, 王艳忠, 张少敏. 深水重力流类型、沉积特征及成因机制——以济阳坳陷沙河街组三段中亚段为例[J]. 石油学报, 2015, 36(9): 1048-1059.
[7]	德勒恰提·加娜塔依, 张明玉, 陈春勇, 谭强, 李玲. 准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷东部二叠系梧桐沟组湖底扇沉积特征及展布[J]. 石油学报, 2015, 36(6): 688-698.
[8]	邹才能, 陶士振, 袁选俊, 朱如凯, 侯连华, 王岚, 高晓辉, 公言杰. 连续型油气藏形成条件与分布特征[J]. 石油学报, 2009, 30(3): 324-331.
[9]	王建功, 王天琦, 张顺, 王占国, 刘彩燕, 韩小强, 吴伟航. 松辽坳陷盆地水侵期湖底扇沉积特征及地球物理响应[J]. 石油学报, 2009, 30(3): 361-366.
[10]	赵俊兴, 李凤杰, 申晓莉, 罗媛, 付伟. 鄂尔多斯盆地南部长6和长7油层浊流事件的沉积特征及发育模式[J]. 石油学报, 2008, 29(3): 389-394.
[11]	李阳. 陆相断陷湖盆油藏微观流场演化规律及演变机理[J]. 石油学报, 2005, 26(6): 60-65.
[12]	李阳. 陆相断陷湖盆油藏流场宏观参数变化规律及动态模型[J]. 石油学报, 2005, 26(2): 65-68.