歧口凹陷歧北次凹沙河街组三段页岩油地质特征与勘探突破

doi:10.7623/syxb202006001

石油学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (6): 643-657.DOI: 10.7623/syxb202006001

• 地质勘探 • 下一篇

歧口凹陷歧北次凹沙河街组三段页岩油地质特征与勘探突破

赵贤正, 周立宏, 蒲秀刚, 时战楠, 韩国猛, 吴佳朋, 韩文中, 张伟, 高欢欢, 马建英, 汪虎

中国石油大港油田公司天津 300280

收稿日期:2020-03-10 修回日期:2020-05-20 出版日期:2020-06-25 发布日期:2020-07-11
通讯作者: 赵贤正,男,1962年10月生,1986年获华东石油学院学士学位,2005年获中国石油大学(北京)博士学位,现为中国石油大港油田公司总经理、教授级高级工程师、李四光地质科学奖及孙越崎能源大奖获得者,主要从事油气勘探与开发研究和管理工作。
作者简介:赵贤正,男,1962年10月生,1986年获华东石油学院学士学位,2005年获中国石油大学(北京)博士学位,现为中国石油大港油田公司总经理、教授级高级工程师、李四光地质科学奖及孙越崎能源大奖获得者,主要从事油气勘探与开发研究和管理工作。Email:xzzhao@petrochina.com.cn
基金资助:
中国石油天然气股份有限公司科技重大专项"大港油区效益增储稳产关键技术研究与应用"（2018E-11）资助。

Geological characteristics and exploration breakthrough of shale oil in Member 3 of Shahejie Formation of Q ibei subsag, Q ikou sag

Zhao Xianzheng, Zhou Lihong, Pu Xiugang, Shi Zhannan, Han Guomeng, Wu Jiapeng, Han Wenzhong, Zhang Wei, Gao Huanhuan, Ma Jianying, Wang Hu

PetroChina Dagang Oilfield Company, Tianjin 300280, China

Received:2020-03-10 Revised:2020-05-20 Online:2020-06-25 Published:2020-07-11

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

歧口凹陷歧北次凹沙河街组三段（沙三段）湖泛期细粒沉积发育、烃源岩品质好、页岩油资源丰富，但其研究尚处于起步阶段，在沧东凹陷孔店组二段湖相页岩油工业化开发的带动下，落实其勘探前景势成必然。为探究歧北次凹沙三段页岩油的地质特征及勘探潜力，依据F39X1井、QY10-1-1井等多口井的岩心、分析化验、测井资料和录井资料，对沙三段页岩层系的地质特征、页岩油类型与富集模式、甜点的空间分布规律等开展了综合研究。歧北次凹沙三段的矿物组成和岩石类型多样，主要包括灰质白云质页岩、长英质页岩、混合质页岩及微晶白云岩、亮晶生屑白云岩、粉砂岩等；烃源岩的总有机碳（TOC）含量主要分布在1%~3%，以Ⅱ型干酪根为主且指示热演化成熟度的镜质体反射率（R_o）普遍高于0.7%；储集空间主要包括粒间孔、晶间孔、生物体腔孔、有机孔及层理缝、构造（微）缝等；页岩油的超越效应明显（油饱和度指数平均为116.3 mg/g）、荧光显示良好。在歧北次凹沙三段中识别出单一型和夹层型2类页岩油，构建了高TOC滞留型页岩油和低TOC运移型页岩油2种富集模式，并建立了基于油饱和度指数、TOC和脆性指数等多参数的甜点定量评价方法及标准。针对甜点区部署了QY10-1-1水平井，其初期的折算产油量达103.5 t/d，预计可形成亿吨级增储新领域。勘探发现证实歧口凹陷的沙三段细粒岩段具备良好的页岩油勘探潜力。

关键词: 陆相页岩油, 页岩层系, 沙河街组三段, 歧北次凹, 歧口凹陷

Abstract:

Lacustrine fine-grained sediments are developed in Member 3 of Shahejie Formation of Qibei subsag of Qikou sag, with good source rock quality and rich in shale oil resources. However, the corresponding research is still in the early stage. As stimulated by the industrial development of lacustrine shale oil in Member 2 of Kongdian Formation of Cangdong sag, it is inevitable to implement the exploration prospects of fine-grained sediments. In order to explore the geological characteristics and exploration potential of shale oil in Member 3 of Shahejie Formation of Qibei subsag, based on the cores, analytical tests, logging data and logging data of the wells such as F39X1 and QY10-1-1, a comprehensive study is carried out on the geological characteristics, shale oil types and enrichment patterns of the shale strata in Member 3 of Shahejie Formation, and the spatial distribution of sweet spots. There are various mineral compositions and rock types in Member 3 of Shahejie Formation of Qibei subsag, mainly including calcareous-dolomitic shale, felsic shale, hybrid shale, micritic dolomite, sparry bioclastic dolomite, and siltstone. The total organic carbon (TOC) content of source rocks is mainly distributed between 1% and 3%, dominated by type Ⅱ kerogen, and the vitrinite reflectance (R_o) is generally higher than 0.7%. The reservoir spaces mainly include intergranular pores, intercrystalline pores, biological cavity pores, organic pores, bedding fractures, and structural (or microstructural) fractures. The shale oil presents obvious crossover effect (with an average oil saturation index of 116.3 mg/g), as well as good fluorescence effect. This study identifies two types of shale oil, i.e., monolayer type and interbedded type, in Member 3 of Shahejie Formation in Qibei subsag, constructs two enrichment patterns, i.e., high-TOC retention-type and low-TOC migration-type shale oil, and establishes the quantitative evaluation methods and standards of sweet spot based on multiple parameters such as oil saturation index, TOC and brittleness index. For the horizontal well QY10-1-1 deployed in the sweet spot, the initial oil production is calculated to be 103.5 t/d; it is expected to form a new field with the increasing reserves of 100 million tons. It is confirmed by the exploration discovery that the fine-grained rock section of Member 3 of Shahejie Formation in Qikou sag has good exploration potential for shale oil.

Key words: terrestrial shale oil, shale strata, Member 3 of the Shahejie Formation, Qibei subsag, Qikou sag

中图分类号:

TE122

赵贤正, 周立宏, 蒲秀刚, 时战楠, 韩国猛, 吴佳朋, 韩文中, 张伟, 高欢欢, 马建英, 汪虎. 歧口凹陷歧北次凹沙河街组三段页岩油地质特征与勘探突破[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(6): 643-657.

Zhao Xianzheng, Zhou Lihong, Pu Xiugang, Shi Zhannan, Han Guomeng, Wu Jiapeng, Han Wenzhong, Zhang Wei, Gao Huanhuan, Ma Jianying, Wang Hu. Geological characteristics and exploration breakthrough of shale oil in Member 3 of Shahejie Formation of Q ibei subsag, Q ikou sag[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(6): 643-657.

参考文献

[1] 赵贤正,周立宏,蒲秀刚,等. 陆相湖盆页岩层系基本地质特征与页岩油勘探突破——以渤海湾盆地沧东凹陷古近系孔店组二段一亚段为例[J].石油勘探与开发,2018,45(3):361-372.
ZHAO Xianzheng,ZHOU Lihong,PU Xiugang,et al.Geological characteristics of shale rock system and shale oil exploration in a lacustrine basin:a case study from the Paleogene 1st sub-member of Kong 2 Member in Cangdong sag,Bohai Bay Basin,China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2018,45(3):361-372.
[2] 张善文,王永诗,张林晔,等.济阳坳陷渤南洼陷页岩油气形成条件研究[J].中国工程科学,2012,14(6):49-55.
ZHANG Shanwen,WANG Yongshi,ZHANG Linye,et al.Formation conditions of shale oil and gas in Bonan sub-sag,Jiyang depression[J].Engineering Sciences,2012,14(6):49-55.
[3] 陈祥,王敏,严永新,等.陆相页岩油勘探[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2015.
CHEN Xiang,WANG Min,YAN Yongxin,et al.Continental shale oil exploration[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2015.
[4] 刘成林,李冰,吴林强,等.松辽盆地上白垩统页岩油地质条件评价[M].北京:地质出版社,2016.
LIU Chenglin,LI Bing,WU Linqiang,et al.Geological evaluation of Upper Cretaceous shale oil in Songliao Basin[M].Beijing:Geological Publishing House,2016.
[5] 张林晔,李钜源,李政,等.陆相盆地页岩油气地质研究与实践[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2017.
ZHANG Linye,LI Juyuan,LI Zheng,et al.Geological research and practice of shale oil and gas in continental basin[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2017.
[6] 蒲秀刚,时战楠,韩文中,等.陆相湖盆细粒沉积区页岩层系石油地质特征与油气发现——以黄骅坳陷沧东凹陷孔二段为例[J].油气地质与采收率,2019,26(1):46-58.
PU Xiugang,SHI Zhannan,HAN Wenzhong,et al.Petroleum geological characteristics and hydrocarbon discovery of shale system in fine-grained sedimentary area of lacustrine basin:a case study of Kong2 Member in Cangdong sag,Huanghua depression[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2019,26(1):46-58.
[7] 鄢继华,蒲秀刚,周立宏,等.基于X射线衍射数据的细粒沉积岩岩石定名方法与应用[J].中国石油勘探,2015,20(1):48-54.
YAN Jihua,PU Xiugang,ZHOU Lihong,et al.Naming method of fine-grained sedimentary rocks on basis of X-ray diffraction data[J].China Petroleum Exploration,2015,20(1):48-54.
[8] 周立宏,蒲秀刚,邓远,等.细粒沉积岩研究中几个值得关注的问题[J].岩性油气藏,2016,28(1):6-15.
ZHOU Lihong,PU Xiugang,DENG Yuan,et al.Several issues in studies on fine-grained sedimentary rocks[J].Lithologic Reservoirs,2016,28(1):6-15.
[9] 赵贤正,蒲秀刚,韩文中,等.细粒沉积岩性识别新方法与储集层甜点分析——以渤海湾盆地沧东凹陷孔店组二段为例[J].石油勘探与开发,2017,44(4):492-502.
ZHAO Xianzheng,PU Xiugang,HAN Wenzhong,et al.A new method for lithology identification of fine grained deposits and reservoir sweet spot analysis:a case study of Kong 2 Member in Cangdong sag,Bohai Bay Basin,China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2017,44(4):492-502.
[10] 蒲秀刚,金凤鸣,韩文中,时战楠,蔡爱兵,王爱国,官全胜,姜文亚,张伟.陆相页岩油甜点地质特征与勘探关键技术——以沧东凹陷孔店组二段为例[J].石油学报,2019,40(8):997-1012.
PU Xiugang,JIN Fengming,HAN Wenzhong,et al.Sweet spots geological characteristics and key exploration technologies of continental shale oil:a case study of Member 2 of Kongdian Formation in Cangdong sag[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2019,40(8):997-1012.
[11] 刘惠民,于炳松,谢忠怀,等.陆相湖盆富有机质页岩微相特征及对页岩油富集的指示意义——以渤海湾盆地济阳坳陷为例[J].石油学报,2018,39(12):1328-1343.
LIU Huimin,YU Bingsong,XIE Zhonghuai,et al.Characteristics and implications of micro-lithofacies in lacustrine-basin organic-rich shale:a case study of Jiyang depression,Bohai Bay Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2018,39(12):1328-1343.
[12] 张顺,刘惠民,王敏,等.东营凹陷页岩油储层孔隙演化[J].石油学报,2018,39(7):754-766.
ZHANG Shun,LIU Huimin,WANG Min,et al.Pore evolution of shale oil reservoirs in Dongying sag[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2018,39(7):754-766.
[13] 郭旭光,何文军,杨森,等.准噶尔盆地页岩油"甜点区"评价与关键技术应用——以吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组为例[J].天然气地球科学,2019,30(8):1168-1179.
GUO Xuguang,HE Wenjun,YANG Sen,et al.Evaluation and application of key technologies of "sweet area" of shale oil in Junggar Basin:case study of Permian Lucaogou Formation in Jimusar depression[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2019,30(8):1168-1179.
[14] 杨华,梁晓伟,牛小兵,等.陆相致密油形成地质条件及富集主控因素——以鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组7段为例[J].石油勘探与开发,2017,44(1):12-20.
YANG Hua,LIANG Xiaowei,NIU Xiaobing,et al.Geological conditions for continental tight oil formation and the main controlling factors for enrichment:a case from the Chang-7 Member,Triassic Yanchang Formation,Ordos Basin,NW China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2017,44(1):12-20.
[15] 柳波,石佳欣,付晓飞,等.陆相泥页岩层系岩相特征与页岩油富集条件——以松辽盆地古龙凹陷白垩系青山口组一段富有机质泥页岩为例[J].石油勘探与开发,2018,45(5):828-838.
LIU Bo,SHI Jiaxin,FU Xiaofei,et al.Petrological characteristics and shale oil enrichment of lacustrine fine-grained sedimentary system:a case study of organic-rich shale in first Member of Cretaceous Qingshankou Formation in Gulong sag,Songliao Basin,NE China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2018,45(5):828-838.
[16] 何涛华,李文浩,谭昭昭,等.南襄盆地泌阳凹陷核桃园组页岩油富集机制[J].石油与天然气地质,2019,40(6):1259-1269.
HE Taohua,LI Wenhao,TAN Zhaozhao,et al.Mechanism of shale oil accumulation in the Hetaoyuan Formation from the Biyang depression,Nanxiang Basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2019,40(6):1259-1269.
[17] 赵贤正,周立宏,蒲秀刚,等.断陷湖盆湖相页岩油形成有利条件及富集特征——以渤海湾盆地沧东凹陷孔店组二段为例[J].石油学报,2019,40(9):1013-1029.
ZHAO Xianzheng,ZHOU Lihong,PU Xiugang,et al.Favorable Formation conditions and enrichment characteristics of lacustrine facies shale oil in faulted lake basin:a case study of Member 2 of Kongdian Formation in Cangdong sag,Bohai Bay Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2019,40(9):1013-1029.
[18] ZHAO Xianzheng,ZHOU Lihong,PU Xiugang,et al.Exploration breakthroughs and geological characteristics of continental shale oil:a case study of the Kongdian Formation in the Cangdong sag,China[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,2019,102:544-556.
[19] ZHAO Xianzheng,PU Xiugang,ZHOU Lihong,et al.Typical geological characteristics and exploration practices of lacustrine shale oil:a case study of the Kong-2 Member strata of the Cangdong sag in the Bohai Bay Basin[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,2020,113:103999.
[20] 周立宏,于学敏,姜文亚,等.歧口凹陷异常压力对古近系烃源岩热演化的抑制作用及其意义[J].天然气地球科学,2013,24(6):1118-1124.
ZHOU Lihong,YU Xuemin,JIANG Wenya,et al.Overpressure retardation of the thermal evolution of paleogene source rocks and its significance for petroleum geology in Qikou sag[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2013,24(6):1118-1124.
[21] 姜文亚,柳飒.层序地层格架中优质烃源岩分布与控制因素——以歧口凹陷古近系为例[J].中国石油勘探,2015,20(2):51-58.
JIANG Wenya,LIU Sa.Distribution and controlling factors of high-quality hydrocarbon source rock in sequential stratigraphic Framework——taking paleogene system in Qikou depression for instance[J].China Petroleum Exploration,2015,20(2):51-58.
[22] 赵贤正,蒲秀刚,王家豪,等.断陷盆地缓坡区控砂控藏机制与勘探发现——以歧口凹陷歧北缓坡带为例[J].石油学报,2017,38(7):729-739.
ZHAO Xianzheng,PU Xiugang,WANG Jiahao,et al.Sand and reservoir controlling mechanism and exploration discovery in the gentle slope of fault Basin:a case study of Qibei slope in Qikou sag[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2017,38(7):729-739.
[23] JARVIE D M.Shale resource systems for oil and gas:part 2-shale-oil resource systems[M]//BREYER J A.Shale reservoirs-giant resources for the 21st century.Texas:AAPG,2012:89-119.
[24] 薛海涛,田善思,卢双舫,等.页岩油资源定量评价中关键参数的选取与校正——以松辽盆地北部青山口组为例[J].矿物岩石地球化学通报,2015,34(1):70-78.
XUE Haitao,TIAN Shansi,LU Shuangfang,et al.Selection and verification of key parameters in the quantitative evaluation of shale oil:a case study at the Qingshankou Formation,Northern Songliao Basin[J].Bulletin of Mineralogy,Petrology and Geochemistry,2015,34(1):70-78.

歧口凹陷歧北次凹沙河街组三段页岩油地质特征与勘探突破

Geological characteristics and exploration breakthrough of shale oil in Member 3 of Shahejie Formation of Q ibei subsag, Q ikou sag

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	杨雨, 文龙, 周刚, 战薇芸, 李海涛, 宋泽章, 张晶, 陶佳丽, 田兴旺, 苑九涛, 金世贵, 史国梁. 四川盆地油气勘探新领域、新类型及资源潜力[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(12): 2045-2069.
[2]	刘喜武, 王心宇, 刘宇巍, 张金强, 刘炯, 刘倩. 中国陆相页岩油地震勘探技术现状及发展方向[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(12): 2270-2285.
[3]	朱国文, 王小军, 张金友, 刘召, 白云风, 赵莹, 付秀丽, 曾花森. 松辽盆地陆相页岩油富集条件及勘探开发有利区[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(1): 110-124.
[4]	刘宇, 朱筱敏, 张自力, 王彤, 杨棵, 刘兴周, 郭峰. 基于地震沉积学恢复断陷湖盆古水系及其演化过程——以辽河坳陷西部凹陷盘山洼陷沙河街组三段为例[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(2): 207-222.
[5]	付金华, 李士祥, 郭芪恒, 郭雯, 周新平, 刘江艳. 鄂尔多斯盆地陆相页岩油富集条件及有利区优选[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(12): 1702-1716.
[6]	赵贤正, 金凤鸣, 周立宏, 韩国猛, 蒲秀刚, 柴公权, 陈长伟, 周素彦, 刘学伟, 韩文中, 姜文亚, 周育文, 马建英, 周可佳. 渤海湾盆地风险探井歧页1H井沙河街组一段页岩油勘探突破及其意义[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(10): 1369-1382.
[7]	金之钧, 王冠平, 刘光祥, 高波, 刘全有, 王红亮, 梁新平, 王濡岳. 中国陆相页岩油研究进展与关键科学问题[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(7): 821-835.
[8]	李国欣, 吴志宇, 李桢, 陈强, 鲜成刚, 刘合. 陆相源内非常规石油甜点优选与水平井立体开发技术实践 ——以鄂尔多斯盆地延长组7段为例[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(6): 736-750.
[9]	赵贤正, 蒲秀刚, 周立宏, 金凤鸣, 韩国猛, 时战楠, 韩文中, 丁娱娇, 张伟, 王国娜, 刘学伟, 汪虎. 深盆湖相区页岩油富集理论、勘探技术及前景——以渤海湾盆地黄骅坳陷古近系为例[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(2): 143-162.
[10]	李国欣, 刘国强, 侯雨庭, 赵先然, 吴金龙, 李伸专, 鲜成刚, 刘合. 陆相页岩油有利岩相优选与压裂参数优化方法[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(11): 1405-1416.
[11]	匡立春, 侯连华, 杨智, 吴松涛. 陆相页岩油储层评价关键参数及方法[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(1): 1-14.
[12]	周立宏, 韩国猛, 马建英, 陈长伟, 杨飞, 张莉华, 周可佳, 陈双清, 杨帆, 董越崎, 周静. 歧口凹陷西南缘沙河街组一段下亚段古环境特征与沉积模式[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(8): 903-917.
[13]	王彤, 朱筱敏, 张自力, 刘宇, 郭诚, 李卓. 莱州湾凹陷北洼沙河街组三段砂岩储层孔隙定量演化模式[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(6): 671-690.
[14]	马钰凯, 孙永河, 马妍, 姜文亚, 孙旭. 渤海湾盆地歧口凹陷构造演化及断裂带成因[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(5): 526-539.
[15]	邹才能, 潘松圻, 荆振华, 高金亮, 杨智, 吴松涛, 赵群. 页岩油气革命及影响[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(1): 1-12.