坎波斯盆地南部下白垩统硅化碳酸盐岩储层成因及演化

doi:10.7623/syxb202310003

石油学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (10): 1612-1623,1649.DOI: 10.7623/syxb202310003

坎波斯盆地南部下白垩统硅化碳酸盐岩储层成因及演化

熊连桥¹, 谢晓军¹, 邓有根², 唐武¹, 张春宇¹, 白海强¹, 刘子玉¹, 廖计华¹

1. 中海油研究总院有限责任公司北京 100028;
2. 中国石油西部钻探工程有限公司吐哈井下作业公司新疆鄯善 838200

收稿日期:2022-10-20 修回日期:2023-05-15 出版日期:2023-10-25 发布日期:2023-11-03
通讯作者: 熊连桥,男,1986年10月生,2018年获中国石油勘探开发研究院博士学位,现为中海油研究总院有限责任公司高级工程师,主要从事沉积与储层地质研究。
作者简介:熊连桥,男,1986年10月生,2018年获中国石油勘探开发研究院博士学位,现为中海油研究总院有限责任公司高级工程师,主要从事沉积与储层地质研究。Email:xionglq2@cnooc.com.cn
基金资助:
中国海洋石油集团有限公司"十四五"科技重大项目（KJGG2021-0100）资助。

Genesis and evolution of Lower Cretaceous silicified carbonate reservoirs in southern Campos Basin

Xiong Lianqiao¹, Xie Xiaojun¹, Deng Yougen², Tang Wu¹, Zhang Chunyu¹, Bai Haiqiang¹, Liu Ziyu¹, Liao Jihua¹

1. CNOOC Research Institute Co., Ltd., Beijing 100028, China;
2. Tuha Downhole Service Company, CNPC Xibu Drilling Engineering Company Limited, Xinjiang Shanshan 838200, China

Received:2022-10-20 Revised:2023-05-15 Online:2023-10-25 Published:2023-11-03

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 通常认为，碳酸盐岩储层中一旦出现硅化现象，储层物性就会遭到破坏，难以存储油气。但有学者发现，由碳酸盐岩完全蚀变而成的硅质岩同样发育溶蚀孔洞，并且有油气发现。坎波斯盆地下白垩统湖相碳酸盐岩中硅质来源、硅质与储集空间的关系及储集空间演化规律等问题尚无系统研究，碳酸盐岩发生硅化后，储层孔隙度如何变化很难回答。基于前人研究成果，结合岩石镜下微观特征、地球化学特征分析，对坎波斯盆地下白垩统硅化碳酸盐岩储集层的岩石学特征、储集空间类型、硅质来源及储集空间演化规律等开展研究，研究结果表明发生溶蚀的硅质岩可以作为储集层。碳酸盐岩中的硅质主要为交代成因，富硅质的热液从基底通过大断裂进入碳酸盐岩地层，对原始碳酸盐岩进行溶蚀，产生硅质胶结、交代作用以及对碳酸盐岩蚀变而来的硅质岩进一步溶蚀；总体上，硅化碳酸盐岩的储集空间演化可划分为①碳酸盐岩高孔阶段、②硅质碳酸盐岩中孔阶段、③碳酸盐质硅质岩低孔阶段、④硅质岩中孔阶段、⑤硅质岩高孔阶段5个阶段；热液活动存在多期性，在沿大断裂分布的硅质岩中可以找到物性较好的裂缝-孔洞型储集层。

关键词: 湖相碳酸盐岩, 硅质岩, 硅化作用, 储层, 下白垩统, 坎波斯盆地

Abstract: It is generally considered that the reservoir properties will be destroied once silicification occurs in carbonate reservoirs, leading to difficulty in the storage of oil and gas. However, some scholars have found that siliceous rocks originated from completely corroded carbonates can also develop dissolved pores, where oil and gas have also been discovered. There still lack systematic studies on the genesis of silica in the Lower Cretaceous lacustrine carbonate rocks of Campos Basin, relationship between silica and reservoir space, and evolution law of the reservoir space. After the silicification of carbonate rocks, it is difficult to grasp the changes in the evolution of reservoir porosity. Based on previous studies and the analyses of microscopic rock characteristics under microscope and geochemical characteristics, the paper investigates the petrologic features, reservoir space types, silica source and storage space evolution law of Lower Cretaceous silicified carbonate reservoirs in Campos Basin. The results suggest that dissolved siliceous rocks can act as reservoirs; silica in carbonates was formed due to metasomatism, and silica-rich hydrothermal fluid flowed into the carbonate formations through major faults, producing a cementation and metasomatism on the carbonate rocks; there were multi-stage hydrothermal fluid activities, including the dissolution of original carbonate rocks, cementation and metasomatism of silica, and dissolution of the siliceous rocks from completely corroded carbonate rocks. In general, the reservoir space evolution of the silicified carbonate rocks can be divided into five stages, including carbonate rocks with high porosity, siliceous carbonate rocks with medium porosity, carbonate siliceous rocks with low porosity, siliceous rocks with medium porosity, and siliceous rocks with high porosity. In addition, fractured-cavity type reservoirs with better physical properties can be found in siliceous rocks distributed along major faults.

Key words: lacustrine carbonate rock, siliceous rock, silicification, reservoir, Lower Cretaceous, Campos Basin

中图分类号:

TE122.2

熊连桥, 谢晓军, 邓有根, 唐武, 张春宇, 白海强, 刘子玉, 廖计华. 坎波斯盆地南部下白垩统硅化碳酸盐岩储层成因及演化[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(10): 1612-1623,1649.

Xiong Lianqiao, Xie Xiaojun, Deng Yougen, Tang Wu, Zhang Chunyu, Bai Haiqiang, Liu Ziyu, Liao Jihua. Genesis and evolution of Lower Cretaceous silicified carbonate reservoirs in southern Campos Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2023, 44(10): 1612-1623,1649.

参考文献

[1] 陈凯,康洪泉,吴景富,等.巴西桑托斯盆地大型油气田富集主控因素[J].地质科技情报,2016,35(3):151-158.
CHEN Kai,KANG Hongquan,WU Jingfu,et al.Enrichment main controlling factors of large oil-gas field in Santos Basin,Brail[J].Geological Science and Tcehnology Information,2016,3535(3):151-158.
[2] VIEIRA DE LUCA P H,MATIAS H,CARBALLO J,et al.Breaking barriers and paradigms in presalt exploration:The Pão de Açúcar discovery (offshore Brazil)[M]//MERRILL R K,STERNBACH C A.Giant fields of the decade 2000-2010.Tulsa,Oklahoma:AAPG,2017:177-194.
[3] ROGERS J P,LONGMAN M W,LLOYD R M.Spiculitic chert reservoir in Glick field,south-central Kansas[J].Mountain Geologist,1995,32(1):140-162.
[4] PACKARD J J,AL-AASM I,SAMSON I M,et al.A Devonian hydrothermal chert reservoir:the 225 bcf Parkland field,British Columbia,Canada[J].AAPG Bulletin,2001,85(1):51-84.
[5] 陆朋朋.柯坪断隆寒武-奥陶系硅质岩的岩石学特征及沉积储层分析[D].成都:成都理工大学,2012.
LU Pengpeng.The petrology characteristics,sedimentology and reservoir analysis of Cambrian-Ordovician siliceous rocks in Kalpin fault-uplift[D].Chengdu:Chengdu University of Technology,2012.
[6] YOU Donghua,HAN Jun,HU Wenxuan,et al.Characteristics and formation mechanisms of silicified carbonate reservoirs in Well SN4 of the Tarim Basin[J].Energy Exploration & Exploitation,2018,36(4):820-849.
[7] RENAUT R W,JONES B,TIERCELIN J J.Rapid in situ silicification of microbes at Loburu hot springs,Lake Bogoria,Kenya rift valley[J].Sedimentology,1998,45(6):1083-1103.
[8] SALLER A,RUSHTON S,BUAMBUA L,et al.Presalt stratigraphy and depositional systems in the Kwanza Basin,offshore Angola[J].AAPG Bulletin,2016,100(7):1135-1164.
[9] POROS Z,JAGNIECKI E,LUCZAJ J,et al.Origin of silica in pre-salt carbonates,Kwanza Basin,Angola[C]//AAPG Annual Convention and Exhibition.Houston:AAPG,2017.
[10] HERLINGER R JR,ZAMBONATO E E,DE ROS L F.Influence of diagenesis on the quality of Lower Cretaceous pre-salt lacustrine carbonate reservoirs from northern Campos Basin,offshore Brazil[J].Journal of Sedimentary Research,2017,87(12):1285-1313.
[11] LIMA B M,DE ROS L F.Deposition,diagenetic and hydrothermal processes in the Aptian pre-salt lacustrine carbonate reservoirs of the northern Campos Basin,offshore Brazil[J].Sedimentary Geology,2019,383:55-81.
[12] LIMA B E M,TEDESCHI L R,PESTILHO A L S,et al.Deep-burial hydrothermal alteration of the pre-salt carbonate reservoirs from northern Campos Basin,offshore Brazil:evidence from petrography,fluid inclusions,Sr,C and O isotopes[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,2020,113:104143,doi:10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2019.104143.
[13] 王颖,王晓州,廖计华,等.巴西桑托斯盆地白垩系湖相藻叠层石礁特征及主控因素分析[J].沉积学报,2016,34(5):819-829.
WANG Ying,WANG Xiaozhou,LIAO Jihua,et al.Cretaceous lacustrine algal stromatolite reef characteristics and controlling factors,Santos Basin,Brazil[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2016,34(5):819-829.
[14] 朱石磊,吴克强,吕明,等.巴西坎波斯盆地湖相介壳灰岩特征及沉积模式[J].中国海上油气,2017,29(2):36-45.
ZHU Shilei,WU Keqiang,Lü Ming,et al.Characteristics and sedimentary model of lacustrine coquina in Campos Basin,Brazil[J].China Offshore Oil and Gas,2017,29(2):36-45.
[15] GOMES J P,BUNEVICH R B,TEDESCHI L R,et al.Facies classification and patterns of lacustrine carbonate deposition of the Barra Velha Formation,Santos Basin,Brazilian pre-salt[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,2020,113:104176.
[16] 熊连桥,李建平,谢晓军,等.湖相碳酸盐岩沉积微相类型及沉积模式——以坎波斯盆地东部下白垩统湖相碳酸盐岩为例[J].沉积学报,2021,39(3):767-780.
XIONG Lianqiao,LI Jianping,XIE Xiaojun,et al.Sedimentary microfacies and depositional model of lake carbonates:a case study of Lower Cretaceous carbonates in the eastern Campos Basin[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2021,39(3):767-780.
[17] THOMPSON D L,STILWELL J D,HALL M.Lacustrine carbonate reservoirs from Early Cretaceous rift lakes of western Gondwana:pre-salt coquinas of Brazil and West Africa[J].Gondwana Research,2015,28(1):26-51.
[18] GOMES P O,KILSDONK B,GROW T,et al.Tectonic evolution of the outer high of Santos Basin,southern São Paulo Plateau,Brazil,and implications for hydrocarbon exploration[M]//GAO Dengliang.Tectonics and sedimentation:implications for petroleum systems.Tulsa, Oklahoma:AAPG,2012:125-142.
[19] 康洪全,吕杰,程涛,等.巴西桑托斯盆地盐下湖相碳酸盐岩储层特征[J].海洋地质与第四纪地质,2018,38(4):170-178.
KANG Hongquan,Lü Jie,CHENG Tao,et al.Characters of pre-salt lacustrine carbonate reservoir,Santos Basin,Brazil[J].Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology,2018,38(4):170-178.
[20] 尤东华,韩俊,胡文瑄,等.超深层灰岩孔隙-微孔隙特征与成因——以塔里木盆地顺南7井和顺托1井一间房组灰岩为例[J].石油与天然气地质,2017,38(4):693-702.
YOU Donghua,HAN Jun,HU Wenxuan,et al.Characteristics and genesis of pores and micro-pores in ultra-deep limestones:a case study of Yijianfang Formation limestones from Shunnan-7 and Shuntuo-1 wells in Tarim Basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2017,38(4):693-702.
[21] 尤东华.塔里木盆地顺托果勒地区中下奥陶统碳酸盐岩储层特征与成因机理[D].南京:南京大学,2018.
YOU Donghua.Characteristics and genetic mechanisms of the carbonate reservoirs of Middle-Lower Ordovician,Shuntuoguole area,Tarim Basin[D].Nanjing:Nanjing University,2018.
[22] AMTHOR J E,RAMSEYER K,FAULKNER T,et al.Stratigraphy and sedimentology of a chert reservoir at the Precambrian-Cambrian boundary:the Al Shomou Silicilyte,South Oman Salt Basin[J].GeoArabia,2005,10(2):89-122.
[23] 杨威,王清华,赵仁德,等.碳酸盐岩成岩作用及其对储层控制的定量评价——以和田河气田石炭系生物屑灰岩段为例[J].地球学报,2001,22(5):441-446.
YANG Wei,WANG Qinghua,ZHAO Rende,et al.Carbonate diagenesis and quantitative evaluation of its control over the reservoir:exemplified by Carboniferous bioclastic limestone member in Hetian River gas field,Tarim Basin[J].Acta Geoscientia Sinica,2001,22(5):441-446.
[24] 杨恩林,陈恨水,陈焕,等.黔东留茶坡组硅质岩元素地球化学特征与形成环境[J].矿物学报,2011,31(3):406-411.
YANG Enlin,CHEN Henshui,CHEN Huan,et al.Elemental geochemistry and sedimentary environment of the Liuchapo siliceous rocks in Songtao-Cengong-Sandu,eastern Guizhou Province[J].Acta Mineralogica Sinica,2011,31(3):406-411.
[25] 雷卞军,阙洪培,胡宁,等.鄂西古生代硅质岩的地球化学特征及沉积环境[J].沉积与特提斯地质,2002,22(2):70-79.
LEI Bianjun,QUE Hongpei,HU Ning,et al.Geochemistry and sedimentary environments of the Palaeozoic siliceous rocks in western Hubei[J].Sedimentary Geology and Tethyan Geology,2002,22(2):70-79.
[26] 许汉华.山东东部近海晚中生代莱阳群硅质岩成因及沉积环境研究[D].青岛:中国石油大学(华东),2016.
XU Hanhua.Origins and sedimentary environment of Late Mesozoic siliceous rocks of Laiyang group in eastern Shandong Province[D].Qingdao:China University of Petroleum (East China),2016.
[27] 焦鑫,柳益群,周鼎武,等."白烟型"热液喷流岩研究进展[J].地球科学进展,2013,28(2):221-232.
JIAO Xin,LIU Yiqun,ZHOU Dingwu,et al.Progress of research on "white smoke type" exhalative hydrothermal rocks[J].Advances in Earth Science,2013,28(2):221-232.
[28] 孙治雷,何拥军,李军,等.洋底热液喷口系统的微生物成矿研究进展[J].海洋地质与第四纪地质,2011,31(3):123-132.
SUN Zhilei,HE Yongjun,LI Jun,et al.The recent progress of submarine hydrothermal biomineralization[J].Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology,2011,31(3):123-132.
[29] ALONSO-ZARZA A M,MARTÍN-PÉREZ A.Dolomite in caves:recent dolomite formation in oxic,non-sulfate environments,Castañar Cave,Spain[J].Sedimentary Geology,2008,205(3/4):160-164.
[30] BONTOGNALI T R R,VASCONCELOS C,WARTHMANN R J,et al.Dolomite-mediating bacterium isolated from the Sabkha of Abu Dhabi (UAE)[J].Terra Nova,2012,24(3):248-254.
[31] DAVIES G R,SMITH L B.Structurally controlled hydrothermal dolomite reservoir facies:an overview[J].AAPG Bulletin,2006,90(11):1641-1690.
[32] 黄思静.碳酸盐岩的成岩作用[M].北京:地质出版社,2010.
HUANG Sijing.Carbonate diagenesis[M].Beijing:Geological Publishing House,2010.
[33] 黄一入,唐菊兴,郭娜.低硫化型浅成低温热液矿床精细蚀变研究——以斯弄多银金多金属矿为例[J].地质论评,2017,63(S1):191-192.
HUANG Yiru,TANG Juxing,GUO Na.Primary research on alteration of the low-sulfidation epithermal deposit:a case study of the Sinongduo Ag polymetallic deposit,Xietongmen County,Xizang(Tibet)[J].Geological Review,2017,63(S1):191-192.
[34] 招湛杰,陆建军,姚远,等.与湘南白腊水锡矿床有关的骑田岭花岗岩的绿泥石化研究[J].高校地质学报,2011,17(4):531-545.
ZHAO Zhanjie,LU Jianjun,YAO Yuan,et al.Chloritization of Qitianling granite related to Bailashui tin deposit,southern Hunan Province[J].Geological Journal of China Universities,2011,17(4):531-545.
[35] 狄明信,马玉新,田海芹.山东新泰盘车沟剖面寒武系硅质层成因[J].石油大学学报:自然科学版,1996,20(S1):1-5.
DI Mingxin,MA Yuxin,TIAN Haiqin.Origin of the siliceous rocks of the Cambrian on Panchegou section at Xintai area of Shandong Province[J].Journal of the University of Petroleum,China,1996,20(S1):1-5.

坎波斯盆地南部下白垩统硅化碳酸盐岩储层成因及演化

Genesis and evolution of Lower Cretaceous silicified carbonate reservoirs in southern Campos Basin

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	鲁雪松, 桂丽黎, 汪泽成, 柳少波, 刘强, 范俊佳, 陈玮岩, 马行陟, 姜华, 付小东, 李文正, 钟源, 李堃宇, 谢武仁. 四川盆地中部走滑断裂活动时间与控藏作用——来自断裂带胶结物U-Pb定年和流体包裹体的证据[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(4): 642-658.
[2]	何文渊, 黄先雄, 王红平, 汪望泉, 范国章, 丁梁波, 赵俊峰, 朱晓辉, 张勇刚, 庞旭, 李伟强, 左国平, 杨柳, 王朝锋. 南美桑托斯盆地深水区古拉绍-1井油气勘探发现及意义[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(2): 339-347.
[3]	杨德彬, 何新明, 张恒, 汪彦, 刘遥, 王明. 塔河油田主体区奥陶系表层岩溶带智能识别及缝洞发育规律[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(2): 374-389,411.
[4]	谭茂金, 武宏亮, 王思宇, 杜广慧, 白洋, 王谦. 中国海相页岩气测井评价技术进展与发展方向[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(1): 241-260.
[5]	郭秋麟, 黄少英, 卢玉红, 王建, 吴晓智, 陈宁生. 塔里木盆地台盆区下古生界油气系统模拟及资源分布预测[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(9): 1459-1471.
[6]	贾承造, 张荣虎, 魏国齐, 王珂, 余朝丰, 曾庆鲁, 司学强. 天山陆内冲断带构造动力控储效应与超深层规模储层[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(8): 1191-1205.
[7]	夏钦禹, 马新华, 郭振华, 李文, 江林, 张林, 李新豫, 刘曦翔, 罗瑞兰, 闫海军, 刘钰洋, 阳成. 川中高石梯区块灯影组四段古岩溶带及内部储层分布特征[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(8): 1299-1312,1332.
[8]	殷树军, 文政, 金雪英, 闫伟林, 王春燕, 师江波, 夏文豪, 李金奉, 聂妮, 郑盛敦. 泥灰岩非常规储层特征及测井表征方法——以四川盆地合川—潼南地区茅口组一段为例[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(7): 1105-1117.
[9]	高永海, 尹法领, 张党生, 孙小辉, 赵欣欣, 陈野, 孙宝江. 水合物储层水平井钻井井筒-储层耦合模型与井壁稳定性分析[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(7): 1151-1166.
[10]	陈利新, 贾承造, 姜振学, 苏洲, 杨美纯, 杨博, 邱晨. 塔里木盆地哈拉哈塘地区碳酸盐岩富油模式与主控因素[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(6): 948-961.
[11]	孔悦, 高晓鹏, 石开波, 刘波, 姜伟民, 于进鑫, 何卿, 吴淳. 塔北地区奥陶系鹰山组斑状白云岩成因及储层意义[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(4): 598-611.
[12]	户昶昊, 郭强, 韩宏伟, 张斌, 王建飞, 庚琪, 尹宜鹏. 辽河坳陷东部凹陷桃园地区沙河街组岩性油气藏勘探突破及意义[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(3): 447-457.
[13]	申威, 唐军, 信毅, 曹磊, 陈文迪, 唐保勇, 何泽, 齐戈为. 塔里木盆地北部潜山岩溶相带定量表征与储层评价[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(3): 471-484.
[14]	郭豪, 王艳忠, 操应长, 孟涛, 王淑萍, 李宇志, 石泉清, 郭迎春, 王加明. 多期石油充注对中—深层碎屑岩储层压溶作用的影响——以车镇凹陷北带沙河街组三段下亚段砂砾岩储层为例[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(3): 485-499,517.
[15]	丁骞, 甘利灯, 魏乐乐, 张宇生, 杨昊, 姜晓宇, 王峣钧. 双孔隙结构因子及其在储层渗透性地震预测中的应用[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(2): 339-347.