地层水在固井水泥中的渗透及对套管的腐蚀

doi:10.7623/syxb201002026

石油学报 ›› 2010, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (2): 322-326.DOI: 10.7623/syxb201002026

地层水在固井水泥中的渗透及对套管的腐蚀

任呈强郭小阳刘丽郭明林王煦

西南石油大学材料科学与工程学院四川成都 610500

收稿日期:1900-01-01 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2010-03-25 发布日期:2013-10-31
通讯作者: 任呈强

Formation water penetration into bond cement and its corrosion to casing

REN Chengqiang GUO Xiaoyang LIU Li GUO Minglin WANG Xu

Received:1900-01-01 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2010-03-25 Published:2013-10-31
Contact: REN Chengqiang

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

介质渗透是固井水泥发生各种腐蚀的必要条件，也是套管外壁发生腐蚀的首要条件。模拟固井水泥的实际应用环境，将套管钢嵌入G级固井水泥中，采用开路电位法和动电位扫描极化法，研究了含饱和CO₂地层水介质在水泥中的渗透和套管的腐蚀。结果表明，动电位扫描极化法和半电位法都便于测定介质在固井水泥中的渗透时间。由极化曲线特征可知氯离子发生了优先渗透，水泥包覆下套管的腐蚀受阳极过程的电化学和扩散步骤共同控制。介质在水泥中渗透初期，钢的腐蚀速率很低，CO₂的渗入起到了阳极去极化的作用，使钢的腐蚀逐渐增大，并最终形成较严重的局部腐蚀。固井水泥的渗透深度与时间呈幂函数关系，指前因子和幂指数分别为0.85和0.62，故随着水泥环厚度增大，渗透时间缓慢增加。

关键词: 固井水泥, 渗透性, 二氧化碳, 地层水, 套管腐蚀

Abstract:

The penetration of corrosive medium would result in various corrosion of bond cement and outer surface of casing in oil well. A simulation experiment was carried out to embed casing steel into grade G cement under the real environment of bond cement. The penetration of formation water with carbon dioxide in the cement and its corrosion to casing were investigated using the open-circuit potential measurement and electrochemical potentiodynamic polarization methods. The results show that both methods are favorable to determine penetration time by detecting the potential and polarization curves of casing steel inlayed in cement ring. The polarization curve characteristics show that the penetration of Cl^- is preferential. The corrosion rate of steel can be controlled synchronously by anodic electrochemical reaction and diffusion processes. The delaying penetration of carbon dioxide after Cl^-can accelerate the anodic depolarization. Therefore, the corrosion rate of formation water to casing can be enhanced, which results in the marked local corrosion on the surface of steel. The penetration depth depended on the time as a power function. The fitted pre-exponential factor and power exponent are 0.85 and 0.62, respectively. Thus, the penetration time can increase slowly with the increasing thickness of cement ring.

Key words: bond cement, penetration, carbon dioxide, formation water, casing corrosion

任呈强郭小阳刘丽郭明林王煦. 地层水在固井水泥中的渗透及对套管的腐蚀[J]. 石油学报, 2010, 31(2): 322-326.

REN Chengqiang GUO Xiaoyang LIU Li GUO Minglin WANG Xu. Formation water penetration into bond cement and its corrosion to casing[J]. Editorial office of ACTA PETROLEI SINICA, 2010, 31(2): 322-326.

参考文献

[1]黄柏宗，林恩平，吕光明，等.固井水泥柱的腐蚀研究[J].油田化学，1999，16（4）：377-383.

Huang Bozong,Lin Enping,Lü Guangming,et al.Researches on corrosion of cement sheath of oil/gas well casing[J].Oilfield Chemistry,1999,16(4):377-383.

[2]Thiery M,Villain G,Dangla P,et al.Investigation of the carbonation front shape on cementitious materials:Effect of the chemical kinetics[J].Cement and Concrete Research,2007,37(7):1047-1058.

[3]William C J,Wigand M,Chipera S J,et al.Analysis and performance of oil well cement with 30 years of CO₂ exposure from the SACROC Unit,West Texas,USA[J].International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control,2007,1(1):75-85.

[4]Castro P,Sanjuan M A,Genesca J.Carbonation of concretes in the Mexican Gulf[J].Building and Environment,2000,35(2):145-149.

[5]徐明根.水泥基渗透结晶型防水材料渗透深度扫描电镜和能谱分析[J].铁道科学与工程学报，2005，2（3）:67-70.

Xu Minggen.Study on penetration depth of cement-based capillary crystalline waterproof materials with SEM and EDAX[J].Journal of Railway Science and Engineering,2005,2(3):67-70.

[6]Vedalakshmi R,Renugha D R,Bosco E,et al.Determination of diffusion coefficient of chloride in concrete: An electrochemical impedance spectroscopic approach[J].Materials and Structures,2008,41(7):1315-1326.

[7]Erdogdua S,Kondratovab I L,Bremner T W.Determination of chloride diffusion coefficient of concrete using open-circuit potential measurements[J].Cement and Concrete Research, 2004,34(4):603-609.

[8]Cheng A,Huang R,Wu J K,et al.Influence of GGBS on durability and corrosion behavior of reinforced concrete[J].Materials Chemistry and Physics,2005,93(2/3):404-411.

[9]Yeau K Y,Kim E K.An experimental study on corrosion resistance of concrete with ground granulate blast-furnace slag[J].Cement and Concrete Research, 2005,35(7):1391-1399.

[10]Gonzalez J A,Molina A,Escudero M L,et al.Errors in the electrochemical evaluation of very small corrosion rates-I:Polarisation resistance method applied to corrosion of steel in concrete[J].Corrosion Science,1985,25(10):917-930.

[11]Locke C E,Siman A.Electrochemistry of reinforcing steel in saltcontaminated concrete[J].ASTM Special Technical Publication,1980,713:3-16.

[12]Song G.Theoretical analysis of the measurement of polarisation resistance in reinforced concrete[J].Cement and Concrete Composites，2000，22(3):407-415.

[13]Chang Z T,Cherry B,Marosszeky M.Polarisation behaviour of steel bar samples in concrete in seawater.Part 1:Experimental measurement of polarisation curves of steel in concrete[J].Corrosion Science,2008,50(2):357-364.

[14]Ahmad S.Effect of cement composition on corrosion of reinforcing steel in concrete[D].Al-zahear:Fahad Easin A,2008.

[15]李子丰，张永贵，阳鑫军.蠕变地层与油井管相互作用力学模型[J].石油学报,2009,30(1):129-131.

Li Zifeng,Zhang Yonggui,Yang Xinjun.Mechanics model for interaction between creep formation and oil well casing[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2009,30(1):129-131.

[16]陈更新，李纹纹，王培铭.氯离子在水泥砂浆中的渗透深度和浓度分布[J].同济大学学报:自然科学版，1996，24（3）：303-308.

Chen Gengxing,Li Wenwen,Wang Peiming.Penetration depth and concentration distribution of chloride ions into cement mortar[J].Journal of Tongji University：Natural Science Edition,1996,24(3):303-308.

地层水在固井水泥中的渗透及对套管的腐蚀

Formation water penetration into bond cement and its corrosion to casing

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	薛毓铖, 王成文, 陈泽华, 孙金声, 唐伟旭, 武治强, 刘伯诺, 黄康. 两亲高温缓凝剂制备及自组装与温度智能响应特性[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(9): 1532-1544.
[2]	丁骞, 甘利灯, 魏乐乐, 张宇生, 杨昊, 姜晓宇, 王峣钧. 双孔隙结构因子及其在储层渗透性地震预测中的应用[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(2): 339-347.
[3]	史晓东, 孙灵辉, 战剑飞, 李斌会, 韩雪, 陆慧敏, 蒋成刚. 松辽盆地北部致密油水平井二氧化碳吞吐技术及其应用[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(7): 998-1006.
[4]	李勇, 纪宏飞, 邢鹏举, 苏义脑, 刘硕琼, 魏风奇. 气井井筒温度场及温度应力场的理论解[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(1): 84-94.
[5]	王千, 杨胜来, 拜杰, 钱坤, 李佳峻. 非均质多层储层中CO₂驱替方式对驱油效果及储层伤害的影响[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(7): 875-884,902.
[6]	刘天乐, 郑少军, 王韧, 孙嘉鑫, 蒋国盛, 张凌, 孙慧翠, 宁伏龙. 固井水泥浆侵入对近井壁水合物稳定的不利影响[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(8): 937-946.
[7]	韩海水, 李实, 姚小琪, 陈兴隆, 张可, 秦积舜. 基于摩尔密度的原油-CO₂体系膨胀能力预测方法[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(4): 456-462.
[8]	赵跃军, 宋考平, 范广娟, 皮彦夫, 刘丽. 酯类化合物降低原油与二氧化碳体系最小混相压力实验[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38(9): 1066-1072.
[9]	贺振国, 李根生, 王海柱, 田守嶒, 沈忠厚, 邵尚奇, 刘新云. 超临界二氧化碳射流中的颗粒跟随及影响因素[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38(4): 475-484.
[10]	侯磊, 孙宝江, 蒋廷学, Geng Xueyu, 王志远, 李庆超. 支撑剂在超临界二氧化碳中的跟随性计算[J]. 石油学报, 2016, 37(8): 1061-1068.
[11]	韩海水, 李实, 陈兴隆, 秦积舜, 曾保全. CO₂对原油烃组分膨胀效应的主控因素[J]. 石油学报, 2016, 37(3): 392-398.
[12]	赵青, 李玉星, 李顺丽. 超临界二氧化碳管道杂质对节流温降的影响[J]. 石油学报, 2016, 37(1): 111-116.
[13]	杨延辉, 孟召平, 陈彦君, 杨艳磊, 干大勇. 沁南-夏店区块煤储层地应力条件及其对渗透性的影响[J]. 石油学报, 2015, 36(s1): 91-96.
[14]	郭建春, 曾冀, 张然, 周长林. 井筒注二氧化碳双重非稳态耦合模型[J]. 石油学报, 2015, 36(8): 976-982.
[15]	邸元, 张园, Wu Yu-Shu. Gibbs自由能最小化法计算二氧化碳-烃-水系统相平衡[J]. 石油学报, 2015, 36(5): 593-599.