石油学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (9): 1562-1573.DOI: 10.7623/syxb202309013

• 石油工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

岩石可钻性测定方法的改进和优化建议

石祥超1, 陈帅1, 孟英峰1, 陈军海2,3, 李皋1, 杨昕昊1, 焦烨1   

  1. 1. 西南石油大学油气藏地质及开发工程国家重点实验室 四川成都 610500;
    2. 页岩油气富集机理与有效开发国家重点实验室 北京 102206;
    3. 中国石油化工股份有限公司石油工程技术研究院 北京 102206
  • 收稿日期:2022-09-08 修回日期:2023-07-11 出版日期:2023-09-25 发布日期:2023-10-09
  • 通讯作者: 石祥超,男,1981年7月生,2011年获西南石油大学博士学位,现为西南石油大学石油与天然气工程学院教授、博士生导师,主要从事石油工程岩石力学方面的教学与科研工作。Email:sxcdream@163.com
  • 作者简介:石祥超,男,1981年7月生,2011年获西南石油大学博士学位,现为西南石油大学石油与天然气工程学院教授、博士生导师,主要从事石油工程岩石力学方面的教学与科研工作。Email:sxcdream@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    中国石油—西南石油大学创新联合体项目(2020CX040103)和页岩油气富集机理与有效开发国家重点实验室开放基金项目(35800000-22-ZC0607-0014)资助。

Suggestions for improvement and optimization of rock drillability determination methods

Shi Xiangchao1, Chen Shuai1, Meng Yingfeng1, Chen Junhai2,3, Li Gao1, Yang Xinhao1, Jiao Ye1   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Southwest Petroleum University, Sichuan Chengdu 610500, China;
    2. State Key Laboratory of Shale Oil and Gas Enrichment Mechanisms and Effective Development, Beijing 102206, China;
    3. Sinopec Research Institute of Petroleum Engineering, Beijing 102206, China
  • Received:2022-09-08 Revised:2023-07-11 Online:2023-09-25 Published:2023-10-09

摘要: 岩石可钻性测定和评价是进行钻井工程设计的重要依据。相继出版的岩石可钻性测定及分级标准对推动钻井工业的发展做出了重要贡献,但随着钻井工程技术进步和测试遇到的问题,有必要对其进行适当的调整和改进。通过回顾石油天然气钻井工程岩石可钻性的发展历史;开展了不同PDC切削齿、定转速变钻压、定钻压变转速的微钻实验。研究结果表明,即使材质和结构相同,来自不同厂家的PDC齿仍然对测试结果有显著影响,建议对倒角误差进行规定,以尽量消除其对测试结果的影响;建议PDC齿侧倾角修改为10°,建议第3级钻压由2 kN更改为1.5 kN,不建议把钻压1 kN所测试的结果用级值"+1"的方式修正0.5 kN测试结果,应根据钻压1 kN和0.5 kN测试结果的对应关系进行修正;通过分析牙轮微钻头结构参数及钻进参数对测试结果的影响,设计了一种6刀片和5挡板结构的新型牙轮微钻头,该微钻头能够解决牙轮微钻头在钻遇硬岩时出现的不能自由旋转问题,消除了牙轮片之间的相互干扰,推荐牙轮微钻头测试钻压仍然为890 N,转速修改为90 r/min,以达到更好的测试效果。

关键词: 岩石, 可钻性, 钻井工程, PDC微钻头, 牙轮微钻头, 钻压, 转速

Abstract: The measurement and evaluation of rock drillability provide an important basis for the design of drilling engineering. The successive release of standards for rock drillability determination and classification has greatly contributed to the development of drilling industry. However, due to the advancement of drilling engineering technology and the challenges encountered in testing, it is imperative to make suitable adjustments and improvements to these standards. Based on this, the paper comprehensively reviews the development history of rock drillability in oil and gas drilling engineering, and performs micro-drilling experiments using different PDC cutters, constant-speed varying WOB (weight on bit), and constant-WOB varying speed. The results show that even though the material and structure are the same, PDC cutters from different manufacturers still have a significant impact on the test results. Therefore, it is recommended that the impact on the test results should be eliminated as much as possible by specifying the chamfering error. It is recommended to modify the side rake angle of PDC tooth to 10° and change WOB in the third stage from 2 kN to 1.5 kN. However, it is not recommended to use the drillability index "+1" to correct the test result of 0.5 kN when the WOB is 1 kN. The correction should be made according to the corresponding relationship between the test results of 1kN and 0.5 kN. By analyzing the impact of structural parameters and drilling parameters of the roller microbit on test results, a new type of roller microbit with 6 blades and 5 baffles is suggested, which can solve the problem that the roller microbit cannot rotate freely when drilling against hard rock, and eliminate the mutual interference between roller blades. In addition, the test WOB of the recommended roller microbit is still 890 N, and the rotational speed should be modified as 90 r/min, so as to achieve better test results.

Key words: rock, drillability, drilling engineering, PDC microbit, roller microbit, weight on bit, rotational speed

中图分类号: